Dr. Shashi Tharoor on Politics, Hindutva & Life (Malayalam)

[@BlueMax333]

as an ex-pat living in the UK for decades, it is good to hear Shashi speaking in Malayalam

[@shwetasingh-hj4nv]

Please next time add English subtitles

[@Wicked1234]

👌👌

[@varmact2806]

Tharooooor G 👍

[@PradeepmysurNagaraj]

What is Hindutva? India as a Nation was not born on August 15 1947, India is a continuing civilization with a Milleniea old Continuity more than a few thousand years lived civilizational experience. The primary philosophical thought of India was all inclusive, all accepting, it was never exclusivist and most importantly it never negated the existence of any other philosophical, Spiritual or Religious thought. However when the philosophies of this land came in contact with Semitic Religions, which inherently are exclusivist, Which inherently exclusivist are conflicting, predatory and proselytising there needed to be a response by a non exclusive, inclusive faith which can be called Common wealth of Hindu Spiritual traditions, to therefore respond to the agression, predation and proselytising attempts made by Abrahamic faiths which came to Indian soil, A response was made by Hindus at that time, and that in later context was called Hindutva. *If Hinduism is the potential inclusivity of the common wealth of indigenous thought, Then Hindutva can be a kinetic effect, which primarily is to defend the Hindu philosophy, culture against Abrahmic-Semitic faiths which is not primarily inclusive, predatory and proselytising* Hindutva by nature cannot be aggressive.Because the very response of Hindutva emanated to be defensive. Hindutva is a intellectual, political, socio response of the Hindus to prevent itself and themselves against aggression. Therefore Hindutva cannot be dominating, because Hinduism is a victim of Aggression. Hindutva by its very nature cannot be agressive, because the very response to Hindutva emanated to be defensive. Unless we examine and scrutinize the Abrahmic semitic faiths which by their very nature are proselytising & predatory & which by their very nature go the extent of negating other faiths as false faiths, then we must ask questions, should Hindus, should not come up with Intellectual, Political - Socio response to preserve and perpetuate the long lasting way of life. We can't accept the false equivalences drawn between two entities. 1. "La ilah illa Allah" "There is no God but Allah " 2. "Jai Shree Raam" "Victory to Raam" "La ilah illa Allah" is a negation of the existence of my God, However we won't negate other belief systems. Sir Sayyed Ahmed Khan in 1926, Hindus and Muslims are different Nations. "It is a Shame to both the Hindus & Muslamaans that the Hindus should have to run away from their homes as they have done, it is the shame for the Muslims because it is out of the fear of the Muslims that the Hindus have to run away from their homes, why Should a Human being inspire fear on other Human, My own experience but confirms the opinion that the Musalmaan as a rule is a bully and the Hindu as a rule is a coward" Mahatma Gandhi after Noakhali Massacre. Writing Thoughts on Pakistan - Dr. B.R.Ambedkar. The Hindus and the Hindutva leaders whose primary ideology is defensive reaction towards aggression have been put in witness box as perpetrators of aggression. That has to change for always and for good times to come, we must be asking questions to those followers and leaders of Abrahamic faiths and we must put them to the same kind of scrutiny as put to the Hindu leaders. Does not your Religion at the very fundamental belief believe in dividing the World between believers and non believers? Is that not exclusivist? Unless we have intellectual strength to ask these fundamental questions we will be continuing to draw false equivalences and we will be treating the symptoms and not the disease itself. PS : As long as proselytising Religions continue their existence as as Proselytising Religions Hindutva should be there to protect itself and not just protect itself but also protect the values that the Hindu society has perpetually held as sacred & sacrosanct & those values are in consonance to the modern secular values that Indian constitution so dearly upholds..

[@Qwertyuiop-hv8yo]

♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️💚💚💚💚💚

[@sukdesh]

1893 alla 1792 alle

[@UniversityofUniverseOfficial]

He support Islam He don't explain Bharat history 🥲

[@Mohtashim]

English 😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😦😦😦😖😖😖

[@UniversityofUniverseOfficial]

BJP ❤️❤️❤️🚩 we need peace not terrorism Why shasi don't explain Bharat history. How many people and temple where destroyed and killed. Fake Faith replace and forced convert to this Bharat.

[@Alwinbenny1417]

who destroyed babri masjid ? who killed thousands of muslims in 2004 at gujarat ? every religion has extremist terrorism...respect everyone first..embrace humanity.

[@UniversityofUniverseOfficial]

@@Alwinbenny1417 how these muslims came to here! How they built babri masjid. Don't try to hide history. And saying everything there.