Sig Sauer P365 CAT Street Crack both K & L configurations 9mm subs

[@mercwork8963]

Nice, good stuff! I’ve been looking into the CAT SC myself

[@dyabacon]

needs more cow bell

[@0AFSYT]

Always more cowbell!!

[@williamboggs1682]

That ammo is the best sounding I’ve tried

[@0AFSYT]

I really love this stuff, it doesn't play too nicely in all PCCs but it works in all my pistols!

[@thegolflife7565]

Do you know anyone that has these in stock?

[@0AFSYT]

Modern warriors had one on gun broker but it looks like it just sold. Q1-q2 they said they will have an L and a K version but some are released in limited numbers.

[@MrMcGregorsWhisperPickles]

Wow.. the K performance is not so great compared to other cans like the Omega 9k, Specter 9, or Omega 36 in K config. The Long configuration sounds good. Short, not so good.

[@0AFSYT]

I haven't had the chance to compare them side by side with the mentioned suppressors. I've never heard the K without ears. I would expect a bit of performance drop removing 2+ inches from any suppressor. Seems on par, the cool part is the k configuration on the p365. Very slick!

[@bstoff001]

The pewsciene rating of the k configuration is on par or better than other tested k cans. Based of his findings I'd say its the best 9mm pistol suppressor out there.

[@MrMcGregorsWhisperPickles]

​@@bstoff001don't get me wrong, the SC is a very high ranking, very high performing can..It's a game changer. And, Jay is awesome and the suppressor world is better because of him. Yes, according to Jays list, Both sizes, in comparison to others he has tested, are best of class for "Hearing Risk Damage Criteria" in the 9mm pistol pedigree. i'm merely going off what I am hearing, with my ears, in this video, not off Pew Science list. What suppressors "sound" like doesn't always equate to the Suppression Risk Damage rankings and that is what Jays scoring is about, suppression of hearing damage, aka-risk damage, not tone, not perceived sound. Some suppressors rate very well on Jays list, but sound "not so great" in different environments compared the "free field" that Jays uses for testing. The SC has far better flow characteristics, which gives it a much higher shooters ear score... however, K cans specially here... the shorter SC and omega 9k, are very very close in MUZZLE Suppression level on Jays list. Which means their risk damage is almost equal, but the omega 9k is trapping more gas and sound inside itself... I myself, think high back pressure 9mm cans sound better on the subsonic spectrum. Less blast is getting diverted out the end of the suppressor and into the free field as sound. Higher back pressure cans will always score lower for the shooters hearing damage risk criteria. Keep in mind, if you are a believer in Jay's list, he himself will tell you ...always remember, Jay will tell you, Muzzle and Ear Performance are RISK METRICS and don't correlate to overall loudness in the free field... there are caveats and keep this in mind with all suppressors....

[@0AFSYT]

I would agree with this assessment. Recently tested this against a variety of other 9mm suppressors and the K configuration has zero back pressure and gas to the face it's REALLY nice compared to older tech.

[@0AFSYT]

I agree with most of what you say except your conclusion that high back pressure cans sound better with subsonics. I know I'm the dude recording a video of how it sounds but I will tell you for damn sure. Ammo, temperature, humidity, elevation, reflective surfaces, microphone quality, upload codec, are all SIGNIFICANT factors, in addition to the factors you mentioned. The only way to get an accurate portal of how a suppressor sounds is to shoot it yourself. I've made that comparison vs gem tech 9m cans and the Odessa and the DA wolf man. It's all quiet but CAT SC edges them out and gets the shit out of your face. End of the day we should all be shooting with ears on so the more I'm spending around suppressors the less I'm worried about chasing dbs, rather than making sure the cans work with the appropriate hosts and provide a good experience regarding back pressure and gas blowback to the end user. I will say I think you're on to something regarding 300 blackout subs and high back pressure suppressors vs high flow rate suppressors and 300 blackout subs. Then again apparently the CAT ODB is quiet with both. We'll have to test in person to find out for sure!