Sigma RF 18-50mm F2.8 DN RF Review: The Best APS-C Option on Canon?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

This video is sponsored by Fantom Wallet. Visit store.fantomwallet.com and use code DUSTIN20 to get 20% off

[@UrielPix]

What APSC Canon needed, the 10-18 from Sigma should be next.

[@larswara2124]

Canon aps-c-owners REALLY deserve this lens!! Have used my Sony version for about a year now, and it`s an impressive lens, considering 2,8 (constant!!) aperture, size, weight, and price. Love it! Hope that Viltrox, Yongnuo etc can follow suit. 🙂

[@justinburley8659]

Hopefully we’ll get some Viltrox 1.2’s for Canon RF in the future

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That would be fantastic.

[@dougmanck4149]

I'm just getting back in to photography after a 15 year hiatus. Picked up a R7 a month ago. It's my lucky day that this Sigma came out before starting a lense collection other than the kit 18-150. It will be perfect for my needs.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Definitely!

[@TheArtofKAS]

Are..... Are we (the rf family) finally getting good third party rf lenses!?!! 👀👀👀👀👀. Excellent!!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's about time!

[@robertcudlipp3426]

Perhaps I'm churlish and 🎉 partly crashing this apsc thread, however I remain a FF Canon owner waiting for Canon to fully open up Canon the RF system, the cost of RF glass is keeping me with my, quite frankly, excellent Canon 6D Mk2.

[@bl8550]

The Sony version of this lens has lived on my A6600 for the past couple of years. It is an absolutely fantastic lens on my Sony - compact, light, very sharp, very useful min focusing distance. An all-around excellent lens.

[@lacabinastudio6994]

I want to try This lens on my Canon C70 maybe it can be a great lens for Events!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Should be.

[@DFlos]

Thank you for this!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad it was helpful!

[@mariaalbi1886]

I currently use a Canon EFS 17-55 2.8 IS with an adapter on the R7, is the change worth it?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I think it is probably is. This lens is optically better, much smaller, and your R7 has IBIS to cover for the lack of IS>

[@lino4thmr1985]

Do you think it's still usable on an R6/R5 and still get away with slight image cropping while editing? Expecting some barrel visibility and vignette

[@lino4thmr1985]

If you plan to review Sigma rf 10-18 could you include a full frame camera also in your review? May be couple of examples on the two extreme focals

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I am working on the 10-18mm right now. I'll try to include a full frame analysis.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I tried to test that, and, in typical Canon fashion, they have anything but the 1.6x crop greyed out. Wanting to make sure you don't access full frame protocols under any circumstance.

[@lino4thmr1985]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Oh damn, hmm if it's R8, 1.6 crop will still have resolution. I am using R6 mk1, I'll loose a lot if sensor resolution. Thanks a lot for testing it on full-frame. Waiting for your 10-18 mm sigma review.

[@lino4thmr1985]

Also if time allows you, would love to see your next Sigma RF lens review on a full frame also.

[@i_read_bad_reviews]

I tried sigma but returned them. The photos looked so sterile compared to the viltrox

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Which Viltrox model? Thus far there aren't any Viltrox zooms, so I'm curious what you're comparing.

[@i_read_bad_reviews]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I'm comparing the look their lens gives. Each brand has a clear color science/identity they are going with.

[@andreabeccarisi1126]

I am in love with mine for X mount, it is my general purpose lens and stays attached to my fuji x-s10 80% of the time, while for portraits I favour prime lenses (30mm and 56mm, also from sigma. Yeah, call me a sigma fanboy, but the price/performance ratio is just that good)

[@IntothewestOkotoks]

Great review, and I'm glad to hear you like the lens! I'm not surprised though, as I've owned/used the Sigma 17-70 2.8-4 C for 8 years, and it's been a fantastic workhorse of a lens. Although I really enjoy my FF Canon lenses (mostly L), the one big benefit to smaller sensor cameras is still the size when there's a proper lens designed just for it (Fuji and Olympus photographers definitely know this!). I have two Tamrons as well and I don't think I'll ever buy Tamron again - but my two Sigmas (the other being a very old 8-16) have done fantastic for the price. IQ wise, if I said the L lenses I've used (28-70 F2, 70-200 2.8, 135 F2, etc) were a near 10 out of 10, my old 17-70 has been a solid 8-8.5, and I'd have no issue printing at A1 size and seeing the details I expect. Between this and the Sigma 10-18 coming out, these are going to make a fantastic travel combo!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm glad you have enjoyed your lens.

[@brianode11]

I bought this lens for my R50, but returned it. Wasn’t fond of how the images looked. I felt that they lacked anything special. I like my EF-S 17-55 more, but I use that lens on an older 70d, and SL1.

[@lukevincent4397]

Nope, this lens is a game changer.

[@droptopshima]

@@lukevincent4397do u have an r50 and this lens? If so how do u like it

[@droptopshima]

Care to share some examples of it

[@HinnerkMusic]

Does this lens support canons setting of "movie servo AF speed"? On rf lenses you can dial in your desired video focus transition speed to avoid jumpy sudden focus changes. If that works the new Sigma RF lenses will be very interesting for filming :)

[@molybdnum]

Look who finally made it! (or rather, who Canon finally chose to let in.) I know this will be repeated content, but thanks for putting a dedicated video together anyway Dustin. Canon shooters who aren't familiar with the options should find it helpful.

[@brackenskye]

what is the make of the wee table top tripod you are using in your video ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Oben Tabletop Tripod shown in video: bhpho.to/3vL8YWy

[@SJMPhotography]

Can't wait for your Sigma 18-50 F2.8 versus Fuji 16-50 F2.8-4.8 review. Any idea when this might be available? Thanks for your great work.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I need to get a loaner of the Fuji lens, but I've got too much on my plate at the moment. I'll get to it this fall, however.

[@SJMPhotography]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Awesome, thanks for the quick reply!

[@lumixS5M2]

Sorry, when use zoom the AF between 35-50mm there is is a flow, more reviewers mainly in Europe talking about.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I didn't notice an issue with that.

[@lumixS5M2]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Local dealer also notice this. He dis refund. Its only between 35-50mm and only when zoom the AF lost focus completely. When not use zoom, AF work fine.

[@CO8848_2]

Canon sucks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I also really enjoy their cameras, but I've hated their policies in the RF mount era. This is obviously a (small) step in the right direction.

[@natureredux1957]

@@DustinAbbottTWI It's not a small step.