Mickey Mania | Mega Drive & SNES | Comparison - Dual Longplay

Steamboat Willie 0:48
The Mad Doctor 5:28
Moose Hunters 14:52
Lonesome Ghosts 18:08
Mickey and the Beanstalk 24:02
The Prince and the Pauper 33:12
Final Boss 45:54
Ending 49:12
MD is 320x224 and SNES is 256x224
LINKS:
GameHut Director's Commentary by Jon Burton
Part 1: • But Can I Play it? MIC...
Part 2: • See How Bad I Am At My...
Part 3: • It's All Over... ...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Other Comparisons:
The Lion King (MD/SN): • The Lion King | Mega D...
Mickey Mania (SCD/PSX): • Mickey Mania | Sega Me...
Mortal Kombat (MD/SN): • Mortal Kombat | Mega D...
Robocop Vs Terminator (MD/SN): • RoboCop Vs Terminator ...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Source longplays:
MD: • Mega Drive Longplay - ...
SNES: • SNES Longplay [025] Mi...

[@saniquinho10]

Graphics: Sega Genesis Sound Effects: Sega Genesis Music: Sega Genesis Gameplay: Sega Genesis Win: Sega Genesis

[@BavarianM]

Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong

[@saniquinho10]

@@BavarianM Right

[@ScarletXDude2K13]

NO! SNEZ WIN

[@OSW]

I didn't expect the Mega Drive to be easily sharper and more defined! Wider Aspect ratio and nicer music IMO. I'm a SNES kid but easy win for SEGA 🐭

[@wordsshackles441]

I mean, that's what the MD did on every game. Higher resolution, wider field of view, better performance, and more responsive controls. Nothing new here. SNES often benefitted from more colors on screen though.

[@henner645]

The disney games were better on the MD most of the time.

[@MegaFCKforever]

GENESIS wins , it has more clear crisp graphic , better overall view on the stage because it is not so cropped than the SNES version is

[@SpaceKlown]

​@@Luc4s__what do you mean?

[@alex-29789]

They mean that the screen is cropped in the snes version

[@lordgeyik]

Music in Genesis souns clearly superior. This is true for most games IMO.

[@DenisSailor130]

But Game Over theme of this makes me cry!

[@christophmatthews4313]

No not for most games. But for this game yes.

[@fullmetalgamer6062]

With better screen resolution, more Pluto, better cutscenes, more stage appropriate music, more levels, and no loading screens; best Mickey Mania goes to Sega Genesis.

[@yop506]

Console wars copypaste

[@fullmetalgamer6062]

@@yop506 you got it.

[@GodKitty677]

@@yop506 Mega CD vs PS1 version has a youtube video.

[@jimmybiggs9230]

There was more finishing touches added to the sega genesis version. Better animation and music! Thumbs up for the sega genesis version!

[@manimani9884]

Jimmy Biggs ewf

[@Dide1001]

Eu fico impressionado com a criatividade dos jogos antigos, eram limitados e faziam verdadeiras.obras de arte, agora e eu fico com o do mega drive pois as animações estão melhores.

[@smbmadman1]

The Genesis version definitely felt more complete in terms of its overall quality.

[@damin9913]

@poof69420 this has nothing to do with the Sega CD version this between genesis and snes

[@crisferas.a5874]

The Genesis or Mega Drive version is the best e most complete Mickey Mania game.

[@fensterh4298]

GENESIS Best, Once again.

[@rubenmatrix8982]

super nintendo have a fatality from sega :D

[@guyincognito7308]

Virtual Bart and Street Racer would like a word...

[@Lightblue2222]

Right snes plays at a slower speed here. And far too many others as well.

[@brugges]

"one again", lol

[@ngiants2230]

She’s is missing that donkey Kong-like level and the music doesn’t really give the same atmosphere of the genesis.. and I’m writing this without seeing the whole video!

[@RustyLeguito]

For me, the Sega Genesis/Sega Mega Drive version wins!

[@lexmalin6166]

Genesis is a better. More detailed and faster then snes

[@XBladenoJutsu]

Yes, plus SNES version has loading times and missing stages.

[@Maru96]

***** And missing parallax, and missing animations...

[@neilsaxton109]

The guy who made the video slowed down the snes version because he is a megadrive fan ha . It's faster then that. And who said megadrive had more details is crazy 🤪

[@KR555FAIZ]

​@@neilsaxton109 a bit hypocrite of your side saying the channel is biased into Mega Drive when yourself is biased to Snes.

[@neilsaxton109]

@@KR555FAIZ No I just know what is better. So wrong . Snes is way better and it with about 80% of games. It was just a lot better machine.

[@jordanscherr6699]

It's pretty obvious to tell which is the port. This was made for Mega Drive first, then ported from there to the SNES.

[@parallaxcraze958]

An easy win for the Mega Drive/Genesis.

[@felipebrasil5]

oh c mon man , dont be a fan boy like that ! both games are amazing with small diferences

[@felipebrasil5]

SEGA CD !

[@patriciopeys8037]

Obio que ganaria el de sega genesis

[@celinesenden4142]

Sega wins

[@videogameobsession]

Both are excellent. I prefer the Genesis version, but I will say that the SNES legitimately looks better in parts. Namely many of the backgrounds (check the BG sky. There are 3 parallax cloud scrolls, where as the GEN has 2. As well as water transparency, and a bit less dithering here and there. I'd say either the Sega CD or PSX versions are the best though.

[@haroldgarrett2932]

both games have gorgeous animations

[@herpderp1750]

Sega wins. Less slowdowns, and I like the color differences more.

[@parallaxcraze958]

Was afraid when reading the video description that you used Mega Drive video from cubex55/World of Longplays KZbin channel but fortunately it's not the case :) because they (deliberately) use bad emulators for everything Mega Drive related (Mega Drive and also Mega-CD and 32X). These guys are sort of haters, lame.

[@youpanza25]

Mega Drive version sounds so much better. I'm impressed, I (still) own a MegaDrive, but I never saw a comparison side by side like this!

[@viviandrob]

The version for the Genesis has some more items as in the phase changes when a circle opens and in the opening of the first stage where it appears film roll design. In 6:56 the flaming torches are in more quantities and more alive in Genesis. In Sega Genesis is played several times the exclusive effect of Mode 7 of Super Nintendo. In Super Nintendo this effect is reduced. Mickey on Genesis is a little faster. At 41:56 in Mode 7 effect is noticeable the superiority of the Sega Genesis processor. But at 19:10 Super Nintendo is better with its lighting effect and more simultaneous color capability. In this game SEGA was better than Nintendo.

[@81giorikas]

Genesis looks dark as fuck...

[@81giorikas]

Plus there are several areas where the snes version has more things going on. And as usual better music etc...

[@anty1222]

no mode 7 in this game...mode 7 only on snes.

[@delfinogarcia5047]

​@@anty1222no es modo 7 pero es más increíble el logro para poder recrearlo en una consola que no está diseñado para ello

[@ryzmaker11]

SNES version has more technical limitations than what some people think. For start it runs in lower resolution (Mega Drive = 320x224 pixels while SNES = 256x224) meaning smaller playfield +, when played on TV, wrong aspect ratio/deformed visuals and less sharp picture. Then SNES version not only lacks 1 stage but also lacks tons of visual effects (animations; parallax...) + lacks some sound samples + has some slowdowns + has some (quite long) loadings... On other hand it has more scrolling planes in a few instances and, yeah, real transparency is nice but dithering-based transparency was common thing back then and works fine enough, even the Neo Geo, released 1 year and a half after the Mega Drive, still relies on dithering or flickering for most transparency effects (BTW: 1° the Mega Drive can also do real transparency by using its shadow/highlight mode for example and 2° SNES also relies on dithering/flickering-based transparency for many games...). So overall the Mega Drive version of Mickey Mania has a slight edge in quality and a huge edge in quantity, in short it's an izi win. And as if it wasn't enough, there's also a Mega-CD version which improves/expands over the already impressive Mega Drive one (there's also a PS1 version but it's another story and, IMO, the 16-bit versions have more merits given respective hardwares).

[@valhakun]

In this very example we can see dithering on SNES at 31:31.

[@KuraIthys]

Some of this results from sloppy programming, some of it is the consequences of lazy porting. Particularly aspect ratio problems. Both consoles when shown on real hardware and real TV's output 4:3 images, or close to it. The actual resolutions of both systems (including overscan and sync signals) is somewhere in the region of 360 by 262.5 for NTSC or 360 by 312.5 for PAL. But the active display area is typically 320 x 224 on the mega drive and 256x224 on the snes, and that's where ports become a massive problem. The extra 74 pixels don't really matter as such. The real disaster comes from both having a 4:3 aspect ratio in spite of different screen resolutions. And both use 8x8 or 16x16 background tiles, and 8x8 to 64x64 sprites. But if there are 320 vertical lines on a mega drive, and only 256 on an snes, yet all the actual graphics drawn are the same size (8x8 to 64x64) how can they ever have the same aspect ratio? Unfortunately, the answer lies in that the mega drive draws square pixels, and the snes draws pixels that are wider than they are tall. (about 1.25: to 1) A 32 pixel snes sprite therefore should be drawn as 40 pixels on the mega drive, while a 32 pixel megadrive sprite should be drawn as 25.6 on the snes. Unfortunately, neither system likes doing this even slightly. (especially not with background tiles), so unless you redraw the entire set of graphics completely (and presumably you can't really do this and have the games look all that similar), one or the other of the systems is going to have weird looking graphics. Snes graphics will look fatter than they should, mega drive graphics will look thinner than they should. Which ends up looking wrong depends on which system you started with if you share graphics between both. The Mega Drive has a slight edge here in being able to do 256x224 output as well, meaning if accuracy of a port is your goal, you can use this to help you out a lot. As for extra animations/levels and so on, there are plenty of snes games that demonstrate that they have more content than the mega drive versions do. In reality this should theoretically be the norm because the cartridge address space on the snes is actually substantially larger. (only 4 of the 16 megabyte address space of a genesis is mapped to the cartridge slot, while the entire 16 megabyte address space of the snes is mapped to it, and only where stuff like the system RAM and registers interfere do you have to worry about it.) The Sega CD changes this of course, but since it has a whole heap of extra hardware in it this is like comparing an unaided super nintendo with one that has the Fastest version of the SuperFX chip in it. I would actually argue the snes can do better than it is often given credit for in these comparisons. Unfortunately it seems there weren't many good snes programmers. Those in the homebrew community can pretty much verify that if there is slowdown on an snes due to how many sprites are showing, this isn't a hardware issue, it's poor programming technique. The more I look into these two systems in fact, the more they start to look pretty similar. Yes, their strengths are in somewhat different areas, but on the whole, what one can do, the other can usually do as well. As for the extra chips in the cartridges, that was by design. It was planned that way from the start, so saying it needed them to compete when using the system that way was how it was designed... I mean, in 1996 an N64 could kick a PC's ass because it had hardware 3d acceleration, but it would be highly stupid to suggest that a 3d accelerator card in a PC was somehow a failure of the PC design, and that therefore the N64 was better because it didn't need 'extra hardware' to compete... The capability to routinely use extra hardware is simply how some systems were designed. Is the Mega Drive worse than the Master System because there was a game built into most Master Systems but not into the mega drive? That's a stupid example, right? For that matter, why did the mega drive end up with the SVP chip to run Virtua Racing, the Sega CD, (call it what you will, bit in many ways it's the same concept as the expansion chips in an snes cartridge), and worst of all the 32x, which again is the same idea but taken to ridiculous extremes in the rather foolish hopes that a Mega Drive could somehow remain competitive against the playstation, N64 and even Sega's own Saturn...

[@parallaxcraze958]

+KuraIthys 4:3 is the TV ratio, the resolution that both consoles output is 320x224 for the Genesis and 256x224 for the SNES, so only the Genesis has a ratio close to TV while SNES ends with stretched visuals, everytime. The only possibility to avoid stretched visuals on SNES is to take its low resolution into consideration when doing graphics by anticipating stretching to come with thinner graphics than expected but it's rather akward to do and this also means less detailed graphics (due to lower amount of pixels) which is why most of the time developers didn't take this into consideration and most SNES games have stretched (i.e. deformed) graphics once displayed on TV. As for extra stuff in most Genesis multiplat, it's mostly due to graphic format, packed (Genesis) vs planar (SNES), and planar takes more space + fact that SNES use samples for sound which also takes more space. You talked about homebrew, but I know someone who is into homebrew scene and himself know someone who is into SNES emulators development and both say that SNES is quite messy hardware, I don't think for example that it can display 128 sprites as it's supposed to be able to. SNES spec sheet is rather misleading anyway... Oh and, SNES might have been designed with additional chips into some cartridges to expand its possibilities but SNES final spec are weaker than expected, Pilotwings wasn't supposed to use an additional chip but they had to do so due to aforementioned reason. IMO SNES has some interesting features, mainly its sample-based sound chip which is handy (but not without its flaws) and its Mode 7 which provides games such as F-Zero hardly feasible on others systems of the time, but other than that, I much prefer Genesis qualities (better CPU, higher resolution, better sprites handling...). Also I take a CD add-on over chips into cartridge ANY DAY, once again much more interesting.

[@vasileios6301]

There is also a pirate famiclone version which is awesome and puts the other 4 versions on shame!

[@user-iz6ki3hi5k]

About "detail", omg, all the people talking and don's seeing something so obvious: The Genesis version is running with an emulator without any filter applied (you can see the individual pixels as squares), the SNES is applying a bluring filtering (you CAN'T see the pixels as perfect squares, and no, the "lesser resolution" hasn't nothing about this issue, the pixel can be more wider or higher, but perfectly defined as the Genesis version, is it? nope, is a "round thing that sees as a type of square", so it's a blurring filter). So, if you don't take care of things like this (I don't understand WHY the youtuber of this video is using very different postprocessing filters with both "machines", that's not make sense except... some idea about making to see the Genesis version as more crispy). The sound is a very rotund point to the SNES version, no discussion about this except you are completely deaf. In graphics, better and more colours in many times with SNES (some animations in the background, candels, etc), but Genesis is very equivalent with SNES version. Very similar fluidity, maybe a little point for the Genesis but the games are very equals in the main categories except sound. Ok, if SNES lacked some stages (that you can evaluate that with this video, it's a extra point to the Genesis version). So at the end, it's about if you want better sound or more stages with similar experience and playability. Or simpler, what system you have/prefer. About transparency, the dithering with SNES (interpolating data of a sprite with a weight against the background pixel) it's the better option to doing advanced transparency effects in 2d games (translucency that you can configure from opaque to transparency), Mega Drive hasn't true transparency effects, it's for this that it uses massive bad dithering effects (that are a shame, you know, using a weaving effect for doing "transparency" it isn't transparency at all, and you can saw that bad and simple effect in many of the 8bit microcomputers, it's so cheap!, every systema that doesn't have some weird configuration about their graphic modes (like Altwasser's technic that you can find in speccy) can do it).

[@DrJones20]

So much is removed from the SNES version, sound and visual effects, animations, voices, cut scenes, songs, parts of levels and the music is off beat with a echo sound. More love seem to have been put into the MD version, clearly the SNES port was rushed.

[@MissJackietheLakester]

Actually the SNES version came first, so it's more logical to say that the Genesis version added more.

[@zenksren8206]

Both versions came out on the same day.

[@MissJackietheLakester]

Sorry, my mistake. I thought the SNES came first.

[@nineyminey4436]

@@MissJackietheLakester It seems that the JP SNES version came out as the same time as the Genesis localization. Oh for North America and Europe SNES versions both of those came out in October. Genesis versions came out a month later.

[@conejosilencioso5090]

Not to much, lol, the SNES has more better color and sound, the genesis only had a some few more scenes, not more

[@roni-san7728]

I prefer genesis version

[@DenisSailor130]

Even Margarita prefers Sega Genesis Version

[@KimonoFlareonGX]

Genesis is clearly the victor here.

[@VoiceParodies]

HAHAHAHAAA...SISSY NINTENDO! Where's the 3D? Sega wins.

[@daminmancejin]

mickey mania is a beautiful game im glad I still have it on the sega genesis

[@chris70341]

Star fox.

[@daminmancejin]

star fox is a beautiful game on the snes too but the problem with that game it looks unfinished

[@granvillimus]

This game doesn't have any 3d. If you're referring to the tower climb in the Mad Doctor level, they cut it out of the SNES version for some reason. I'm assuming laziness is the reason, the later variant of this level in Prince and the Pauper IS still in the SNES port (so it's not like the snes couldn't handle the visuals).

[@tonmaster189]

star fox count on additional chip on cart doing all hard work not on own stock hardware

[@deadchannel4792]

I have a strong feeling the SNES version was rushed, while the Sega Mega Drive/Genesis version had more time to be worked on.

[@inceptional]

Yeah, it seems a bit like that. All the things you expect to be there on Genesis are, both the good (all the stuff that's good, and nice use of line scrolling for faux parallax at times) and the bad (less colours, lack of proper transparency and few background layers in some levels). All the things you expect to be there on SNES sometimes aren't (more layers in some areas, proper transparency in some areas, the same amount of animation frames and animation speed, line scrolling alongside the additional background layers at times, some of the random details like torch flames in some areas or the snow outside on the last boss fight, etc). The SNES version really should have had everything in the Genesis version plus the extra colours, extra background layers and proper transparency.

[@damienlobb85]

@@inceptional I have to wonder why the scrolling levels were left out on the SNES?. Also why would they rush the SNES version and not the Gens version? There was also a SegaCD version and eventually PSX.

[@inceptional]

@@damienlobb85 The developer already said they simply took a bit longer on the Genesis version. A bit sad to know they didn't give the SNES version the same amount of time and love to be honest. But this particularly company was very much in the Sega camp and put most of their games on Sega platforms first and foremost, so it's no surprise.

[@inceptional]

It literally was. The developer already admitted they rushed the SNES version out slightly and had more time on the Genesis version to really add that extra layer of polish. Also, you can easily see this is a Genesis game ported to SNES rather than a game made to take full advantage of the SNES: Most of the levels that could use three background layers don't, there's rarely many more colours in the SNES game when it could have technically had up to four times as many colours in every single level, there's moments where transparency wasn't used but could have been such as on the ghosts on one level, etc. This game actually could and really should have been even better on SNES that it was and ultimately better than the Genesis version almost across the board.

[@earlduran6419]

Please note : it just editing it doesn't mean Sega Genesis version has loading times at the first time.

[@sloppynyuszi]

I think graffically these are quite close. I think the Mega Drive just edges it out with the extra few details. I think the Mega Drive is pushing a lot harder than the SNES though, which is why the Mega Drive is getting all the praise. Like the Mosse chase floor textures are ever so slightly more random and detailed on the SNES, the fact that effect is achieved at all on the MD is just fantastic. Overall both versions are fantastic! And till this day it’s the best looking 2D Mickey game, and wouldn’t look out of place as an Indy game on the Switch or something. Would love the Cuphead team remake this game though. Would look awesome!

[@Italia.90]

It's the other way around. Snes is struggling to keep up.

[@retrorun]

MegaDrive looks the best. But recently I completed the SNES version. Couldnt finish it when I was a child, too hard back then! Still an amazing game to play in any console!

[@GodKitty677]

There is a version for the mega cd addon. Also there is a PS1 version.

[@felipealexandrenascimentof1897]

A versão do mega é melhor em tudo mesmo, o mega em jogos da Disney sempre leva a melhor.

[@MrJ0mmy]

Mickey Mania looks really good on the mega drive sound and audio are great almost as good as the ps1 version

[@Kippykip]

One common thing I've noticed with these comparison videos is it seems the SNES always has terrible low Hz muffled sound while the genesis seems to have a lot sharper sound, especially in musical instruments. Anyone know the technical reason for this?

[@g_ato3337]

Probably some sample compression or Interpolation, genesis its a synth which sounds a lot mote clear

[@segaforce8310]

Because the snes is overrated garbage 🗑

[@Kippykip]

@@segaforce8310 LOL based

[@wordsshackles441]

The Mega Drive's YM2612 sound chip has a sound output of 53 kHz, higher than the Super Nintendo's S-DSP which has a 32 kHz output, giving the YM2612 a wider frequency range. The S-DSP also uses Gaussian filtering, which eliminates noise by cutting-off the lowest and highest frequencies, at the expense of further limiting the frequency range, creating a muffled sound. The Mega Drive's greater frequency range, on the other hand, provides sharper audio clarity, but with more noise heard at at the highest frequencies, while a lowpass filter reduces noise at the lowest frequencies on both systems (with the Super Nintendo's Gaussian filter further reducing noise at the expense of muffling).

[@predaking2wings]

everybody agrees genesis wins this round. snes missed a stage were the boxes are floating in the air!!!

[@retropolis1]

+Jungleman savetheforest Nope, I don't agree.

[@thetoontastictoon1720]

no boss music for first boss in SNES, so I automatically disagree that SNES is better. Megadrive all the way 'cause it doesn't kill the boss music at the start ;o;

[@retropolis1]

True, there are (very few) things missing. I however, talk about the quality of what is there. One missing music tune doesn't turn the overall quality. A much softer and more diverse color palette in all of the game is definetely more of an advantage than one more music tune. See Rock n Roll Racing. RRR has one more tune on the genesis, but the SNES Original still has way superior sound and graphics quality.- and is clearly the better version.

[@thetoontastictoon1720]

+karaokefreak1 Alright, you're right about that I'll admit. One tune doesn't kill the whole show. to extend apoun my statement, I do s'pose the SNES has slightly brighter colours :p

[@rootykazooty351]

SNES misses *2 levels* plus the bonus stage and the first part of the last boss. The SNES game is still grest, but the Mega Drive version is definitely better. Mega Drive's controls are tighter too, as usual. (i have both versions).

[@diegomtz4168]

Genesis this is incredible

[@EdgyNumber1]

I notice Disney no longer cares about Mickey Mouse any more. So much so that the original Mortimer Mouse character is going to fall into public domain. Disney is a mess.

[@Longlostpuss]

The Genesis in general seemed to own these Disney licensed games. Almost makes you wonder if Sega almost built the Genesis around these games coming in future. What's interesting here is if you pause at 3:18, the SNES and Mega Drive seemed to swap colour focus between foreground and background. Overall the SNES has more vibrant colour (as usual) and a cleaner more synthesised soundtrack, but I think the Mega Drive bossed on overall detail and shading on the artwork as usual.

[@jerronimo13]

Mega drive wins hands down!

[@RodrigoGeraldo]

Genesis The best version

[@RodrigoGeraldo]

Sem dúvidas a versão Genesis é a melhor em tudo 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@bluetheelf4655]

My... talk about "Genesis does what Nintendon't"! I'm glad I grew up with the Sega version instead!

[@thetoontastictoon1720]

eeeyup.

[@DrJones20]

I grew up with the SNES version.. I clearly missed out

[@DrJones20]

***** I did indeed

[@luissanchex5217]

Super Metroid and Donkey Kong Country kills the Genesis

[@paoloretrogamer]

Luis Sanchex Vectorman 1 & 2 Say Hello!

[@daveshen0880]

Genesis: Full version. SNES: 20%, not completed.

[@Alinktome]

17:00 moose rampage in a 3d world on snes and on a toilet paper tube on genesis.

[@heinrich3582]

Mega foi um guerreiro digno, mostrou muita força diante de o console 2 anos mais novo, o incrível snes. Mickey mania Earthworm jim 1 ,2 Lion king The jongle book Mortal Kombat ultimate 3

[@georgeflin8382]

3 anos 1988, 1989, 1990 vantagem do snes

[@heinrich3582]

@@georgeflin8382 não o Snes foi lançado em 90 , Mega acho q foi quase no final de 88

[@georgeflin8382]

@@heinrich3582 quase 3 anos no fundo meio 1988 snes final 1990 para 1991 acho

[@yop506]

@@georgeflin8382 Sega MD: Oct 1988 Snes: nov 1990

[@KingRey.]

I just want to point out that the SNES version also has the dark staircase. I just played it right now.

[@daminmancejin]

I love mickey mania on the sega genesis way better!!!

[@cyberpc1333]

Melhor versão = Sega CD A versão do SNES sofreu inúmeros cortes: resolução, animação, sons, fases, efeitos visuais, parallax, etc.. Fora o loading time e Slowdown 23:05 nessa parte fica injogavel!

[@andressigalat602]

The SNES version lacked the secret Mikeys, or the player simply neglected to find them?

[@danieldavid6632]

I Love Genesis.

[@SmokeyChipOatley]

I read the blackboard in the boss fight room as, "Donald and Goofy divided by a saw..." I'm obviously wrong. But that would be some next-level pre-fight psychological intimidation tactic coming from the mad scientist. Most Disney villains aren't *that* hell-bent on giving Mickey PTSD.

[@kesler741]

A resolução do mega ocupa mais do q a do snes

[@bubbles46853-ep9if]

Do Toy Story!

[@silenig]

now, here's an idea :)

[@raulfergonz3498]

En Megadrive los juegos de Disney eran muy superiores a los de Snes. SEGA superó a Nintendo en muchos aspectos

[@TXFDA]

This is one instance where the Genesis version is better. Especially with it being a bit wider resolution, makes figuring out what you're doing a bit easier.

[@TXFDA]

***** I didn't say it was the ONLY instance. I said it was one. As in one of the instances that exist. As in multiple exist, and this is one of them.

[@LoCoSHINOBI]

SEGA kills NINTENDO on this game. (SG) {SEGA GENESIS}.

[@jacklazzaro9820]

(SG) 1000

[@CerberusLetsPlay]

Mega CD > Mega Drive > SNES Should have had a 3 way for this :)

[@Indigo1Black]

Nice animation of the Genesis side of Mickey jumping over a moose in pause! Where did that one come from did they really make a remake of this game?

[@silenig]

No, it's fanart from www.deviantart.com/art/Mickey-Mania-HD-Moose-Hunters-355014467 . I'd love to see an HD remake like Ducktales

[@Indigo1Black]

That is what I am still waiting for a remake of Mickey Mania

[@realamericannegro977]

@@silenig incredible to be honest, reminds me of the Ducktales remake.

[@twist58]

(4:11) I find it humorous that the Mega Drive version pauses at the Steamboat Willie crane boss fight. As if Sega is just waiting contently until SNES finishes their crane boss fight.

[@solarflare9078]

LOL. There are seriously people that think the Genesis version sounds shitty? Listen to the SNES version with its low-energy, muffled and shitty samples that makes it resemble a generic MIDI. Now compare it to the cleaner, more upbeat sounding music with higher quality samples, especially the drums.... on the Genesis!

[@Mittens0407]

Yeah the SNES version has no dynamics at all. No pitch bends or vibrato. On some tracks they even mess up the echo effect by having both channels at the same volume.

[@KAILOONE]

The snes versions were usually more detailed but strangely in this game, the sega wins by far.

[@chelsymenster183]

There are a lot of multiplatform games that look, sound, and play better on the Genesis vs. the SNES. I love how SNES and Nintendo fans have to sneak in their little jabs and justifications. "Yeah well erm not in this case but USUALLY snark this is strange". Yeah looks like you've never played Pit Fighter, Samurai Shodown, Thunder Spirits, Robocop vs. Terminator, Beavis and Butthead, Hard Drivin, Out of this World, Earth Worm Jim, Mortal Kombat, NBA Jam, Toy Story, to name a few, all games that are superior on the Genesis. Just get off your stupid Fanboy delustion and realize that the Genesis hardware was superior to SNES in some ways, the SNES superior in other ways, and realize that both systems are great and each has it's share of superior games and amazing exclusives. Enough of this stupid fanboy nonsense.

[@KAILOONE]

Chelsy Menster Hahahaha... whaat? To get off my stupid fanboy delusion? What are you talking about like really WTF are you talking about haha. I own a Genesis since I was a kid, I own more than 100 games on it, I finished more than 90% of all my games. I always loved playing Toejam & Earl Panic on Funkotron vs any of the games my friend had on his SNES... I love the Genesis and all it's games, and yes I have played all the games you have mentioned and own them. I am just saying that SNES games usually looked better and sounded a little better when it came to comparisons on the same game for both platforms. But this game is just way better than the SNES version, it's like the first time I see a Genesis game butcher a SNES game. I never said I was a fan of either, thats what you assumed. I am not a fan of either but I did like just a little more the Genesis games overall vs the SNES ones.

[@LoCoSHINOBI]

KAILOONE Agreed because as I type im looking at my Killer Instinct for SNES in very good condition but I still play all my fighters on SG and at the end of the day I still want the SG overall.

[@KAILOONE]

***** Did you even read my comment?

[@GraveUypo]

it's not strange when you realize this game was made for the genesis (by a dev that likes to use hardware tricks to extract the maximum potention of the console, on top of it) and then ported to the snes. no way it was going to be better or even as good on the snes.

[@HexPerplex]

You know what’d be awesome? A Mickey Mania remake in the same style as Cuphead.

[@billoverbeck3784]

Sega really knew how to handle with Disney games...

[@user-rs1990]

I remember hiring this game in one case.

[@KuraIthys]

And while I'm going through this anyway, notice how there is a rotating tower section on the mega drive which is not on the snes? You could naively claim this is because the snes can't do it, but chrono trigger would prove you wrong immediately. In short, don't take what you see in a single game as conclusive proof of what hardware is capable of. It's often more a case of 'couldn't be bothered to code it' than 'we can't do it'. Especially in snes and mega drive comparisons.

[@HaidesTunicaRoja]

Same happens with ttransparencies... Supposedly, Mega Drive couldn't do transparencies, but you can see them in Myckey Great ircus Mistery, same as in Sonic games, in water. Sometimes, programmers surpassed videoconsoles' limits with a lot of work and well-elaborated codes. So, both consoles could do a lot of things that usually people said it was exclusive from one console or another; but it was solely with well refined programming. Then... can they do all those things? Yep. Can they EASILY do it, so that any programming team can use it? I think not. But, there they are. :D And it's good they forced the machines ^^

[@inceptional]

@@HaidesTunicaRoja The Genesis can't do proper transparencies; it can do a few tricks in very limited ways to fake transparency. The SNES can do proper transparency on both backgrounds and sprites, to any level of transparency and on any shape, and can even change the opacity in real time. Bosses can fade in and out of existence, semi-transparent clouds can move across the entire screen, transparent water can move and wave around with irregular shapes on the surface, random objects can be made to look like they are made of glass or jelly or smoke with ease, etc. SNES has transparency as a built in feature that comes at almost no cost, and it can even be used to increase the colour count to the full 32,000+ the system has (in a totally useless use-case, but still possible). The Genesis can trick people like you into thinking it can do full proper transparency, and in some limited-use cased it even ends up being pretty much the same thing as real transparency in how the end result looks, but that's about it. One 100% of the time could and a lot of the time does, the other 99% of the time can't and doesn't.

[@thetriggeredone3461]

@@inceptional The genesis has shadow and highlight which can allow for transparency

[@SionynJones]

No surprises. The game was originally developed for the megadrive. The is a snes port/conversion and it shows. Megadrive easily has better hardware than the snes. For example the 16 bit wide data bus in the megadrive runs rings around the snes small 8 bit system bus.

[@thetriggeredone3461]

thats what me and other sega fans keep saying the snes may have a few more instructions but the genesis is 32bit and 16bit allowing for more to be done

[@videogameobsession]

You can't really go wrong with either. The Genesis seems to have a bit more speech here and there, and the SNES version has better parallax scrolls and a bit more color with the clouds and sky BG ( at 25:00)

[@MrZillas]

It's so close I cannot see any differences. I'd just say, that sometimes in the SEGA-version is more colors or action in the background. I'd like to see the tower-scene on SNES, but I didnt find it. Does the SNES have it? (8:14)

[@azzamatic4190]

MEGA DRIVE in a heart beat

[@PATBATEMAN187]

this is better than cuphead

[@SRPC21]

V surprising the Mega Drive's music is better than the Snes'

[@videogameobsession]

both look excellent IMO. The Genesis does an incredible job with the pseudo 3D and Mode 7 like bonus stage effects. There are a couple levels where the SNES has the advantage such as at 19:00 The Genesis has a lot of dithering around the spotlight effect where as the SNES has a smooth gradient effect. Not a big deal though.

[@inceptional]

The SNES version really should have had all the extra stuff it can do that the Genesis can't (more colours, proper transparency, more background layers in general) plus everything in the Genesis version that it can also do. The stuff that wasn't in the SNES version or that just looked worse doesn't make any good sense to me.

[@AbrahamCortina-tz9lx]

Mario Mania * Super Mario Bros. * Super Mario Bros. 2 * Super Mario Bros. 3 * Super Mario World * Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island * Super Mario 64

[@cabrejos96]

I remember playing the snes version as a kid. Man, was i robbed

[@DTVisDISNEY1984]

what the hell snes??... compared to the Genesis version the Nintendo game is half ass done..a perfect example of Sega does what Nintendon't

[@parallaxcraze958]

DKC lol, some digitized sprites, some nice backgrounds and what? There are many better Genesis games such as Streets of Rage 2, Ristar, Thunder Force IV, Alien Soldier...

[@TheEliaz78]

mourad velasquez vectorman say hello dumbass!

[@diceshard5961]

...Oh really? Super Mario World, Super Mario All-Stars + SMW, Yoshi's Island, Kirby Superstar, Kirby's Dreamland 3, The Legend of Zelda: a Link to the Past, Star Fox, Super Metroid, Donkey Kong Country Trilogy, the Mega Man X Trilogy... sure Sega can compete with that... definitely not with that totally dead furry of a mascot they have.

[@diceshard5961]

...oh I forgot the rest: Earthbound, Chrono Trigger, part of the Final Fantasy series, Super Mario RPG, Street Fighter 2 and Super Punch Out... wow Sega is sooooo much better... you can see that on the way their company stands now...

[@MissJackietheLakester]

If you think better exclusives equals a better console, then how come console fans always bash on Nintendo for not having the same games as the playstation and xbox consoles?

[@laitsuZ]

I love sega's boss sound it's like a boss.

[@rolandcaubet3319]

GENESIS MEGA DRIVE

[@emilioferro9586]

Mais uma vitória sublime do fantástico Mega Drive/Genesis!!

[@NurFaktenHier]

These were times i really liked. In my opinion there is no real winner as (this system is better). But i do like the honest comparisons made in the comments, so thumbs up for the community^^ In this game Sega has better music and looks ( my opinion).

[@MrTERRY002]

MEGA é o verdadeiro 16 bit

[@realevostevo]

Should throw Sega CD in there too!

[@GamerWho]

Sega CD is the best version as it has more levels

[@NTxC]

The music is much better on the Mega Drive!

[@Nobunaga1983]

Better on the genesis. Mickey is way too floaty and slow for snes

[@Demetannn]

David Steck Because it's a Pal version (SNES) Vs Japanese version for the Genesis.

[@Nobunaga1983]

Oh

[@Nobunaga1983]

I think the genesis version is for mega drive which was slower than the American genesis

[@Nobunaga1983]

Wouldn't say better but this game is

[@jamiey5779]

+David Steck The Genesis was called the Mega Drive in both Japan and Europe. This is a comparison of the PAL SNES version of the game and the Japanese NTSC version running which is running at 60hz.

[@nintendo4life132]

I blame Disney to make SNES look like a joke. If Nintendo was developing the game along side with Disney, it give a lot more.

[@inceptional]

I best most people don't realise there's actually plenty of things that are better in the SNES version. Compare the lighting vignette effect around the player in the Genesis version to the SNES version: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Compare the water effect on the Genesis version to the SNES version: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Notice the additional full layer of background clouds plus the additional colours on the plants, seeds and apple there on SNES compared to the Genesis version (and it's still nowhere near taking proper full advantage of the 4x as many colours SNES can put on-screen): kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Again, the extra layer of clouds on SNES and nicer colours in the butterflies: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Notice the just nicer colours on SNES in this scene: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Notice the additional layer of stars, moon an added snow in this scene on SNES: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Notice the additional far background layer of parallax here on SNES: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Notice how there's both the far background and rising flames as well as the tower on SNES, whereas on Genesis it's missing the far background: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck The main reason the game isn't noticeably better on SNES in even more areas is because Traveller's Tales was/is a hardcore Genesis fan and always put just that little bit more time and energy into really pushing and polishing the Genesis versions of its games. Also, the SNES version was released early while the Genesis version had more time in the oven to add a few things here and there that also could have been in the SNES version too. That's the reason the extra whirlwind level is in there for example, as it was a last minute addition to the Genesis build afforded by that extra development time. Pretty much everything that's better about the Genesis version is due to more time and polish, and pretty much everything that's better about the SNES version is due to the SNES actually being technically more capable in those particular areas. But, the one thing the Genesis will pretty much always have over SNES with games like this is more horizontal view. If you pay attention, however, you'll notice they made a more dynamic camera on SNES to make up for the lower horizontal view somewhat, where it actually moves further ahead of the player in the direction they're facing to show as much of the level ahead as possible. It's a compromise on SNES for sure, but it works well enough, and funnily enough even actually results in the player seeing a bit more of the level ahead of the player than in the Genesis version sometimes: kzbin.info/www/bejne/p4bWe3Wkd9Sseck Lastly, this game is another example of a SNES title that is stuck in SlowROM [accidentally] at only 70% of the system's full CPU speed. So even there it could be improved further too. ROM hacker Maxwel actually made a FastROM patch, which improves the speed of the game in quite a few areas. Ultimately though, as it is, the Genesis version is just overall the better of the two.

[@aiedne]

1 - STEAMBOAT WILLIE - Level Warp 2 - THE WHARF 3 - MAD DOC 1 4 - MAD DOC 2 5 - RIDE THE GURNEY 6 - MAD DOC 4 7 - ELEVATOR 8 - MAD DOC EOL 9 - MOOSE HUNT 10 - MOOSE CHASE 11 - HAUNTED HOUSE 12 - HAUNTED BASEMENT 13 - HAUNTED HALLS - Level Warp - ESSE EU NÃO CONSEGUIR PEGAR, Mais Tem Vídeo na net uma mulher pegando sem querer 14- GARDEN 15- TUNNEL 16 - STEPS 17 - TABLE 18 -LIBRARY 19 - KITCHEN 20- DUNGEON 21 - TOWER ESCAPE 22 - DUNGEON 2 - Level Warp 23 - PETE EOL

[@ezequielranne3558]

En esa epoca en la que salio este juego de video, cualquier persona que hubiera tenido solamente un Family Game (Nintendo NES 8-Bit) Sin lugar a dudas hubiera sentido envidia por cualquiera de las dos versiones, tanto de SEGA como también la versión de Super Nintendo! (At that time when this video game came out, anyone who had only had a Family Game (Nintendo NES 8-Bit) Without a doubt would have felt envy for either version, both SEGA and also the version of Super nintendo!)

[@coolxjl]

SNES version looks like it's in slow motion.

[@Illutorium]

Absolutely "Genesis". Sound of every round are be better of "Genesis" only.

[@romilson_007]

Mega Driver tá mais fluido!

[@retrovgnamusic]

I wonder why Disney's games are better in Genesis than in SNES. Sega had better relationship with Disney than Nintendo?

[@HaidesTunicaRoja]

Probably it was easier to preogram in a Motorola 68000 than in the strange thing that SNES had in their innards. So, Disney programmers found it more accesible. : )

[@Andrea_Bassi]

What a ridicolus "square" resolution on the snes... It seems a gameboy game compared to the 320x224 of the genesis... And the sad thing is that this resolution is usen on almost all the snes titles...

[@inceptional]

Because this is the SNES resolution.

[@Mittens0407]

@@inceptional Yes? That's what he was saying.

[@MrPipo9010]

smoother animation with sega

[@bananarnold1831]

The only thing SNES has over the Sega Genesis is the music. The soundtrack on Sega sounds horribly robotic and 8 bit while the SNES soundtrack sounds more lively and closer to an actual orchestra.

[@iulianispas8634]

Not only that snes missing multiple themes including one stage and controller all over the place

[@Dachimotsu]

Wait, is it just me or is that small, dark segment after the elevator level not in the North American version? Cuz I've played this game numerous times on the Genesis, and the elevator just segues directly into the laboratory.

[@adidas1984x]

The sega cd version was amazing . Add that one with the two . Music was great

[@mopbrothers]

SNES all the way. The sound chip alone is what gives it the win.

[@StaticTV80]

Clean your ears

[@Mittens0407]

@@caioalves3343 To me the SNES soundtrack sounds disgusting. Super shrill and hard on the ears. There's no pitch bends, vibrato, or any dynamics really, and the samples they chose are really obnoxious. There are many points where the songs that have a 2 channel lead for an echo effect sound terrible on the SNES because they have both channels set at the same volume. (5:57, 13:40, 20:17) And the SNES version has less voice samples.

[@oabadiaz]

Megadrive gana de nuevo, mejor sonido y gráficos más definidos, además de más músicas, la fase de la torre giratoria...

[@felipealexandrenascimentof1897]

A tela de jogo do mega é absurdamente maior, sem chance pro Snes.

[@VictorPLopes]

Fonts: Genesis Animation: Genesis Sound: Genesis Sprites: Genesis

[@solarflare9078]

Literally everything: Genesis

[@Ultrakupra]

This game was made for the genesis,and then ported to the snes,so yeah,its much better on the sega machine.But,if you want a much better mickey game you can play magical quest on the super Nintendo

[@eduardohenriquelima]

Jogos da Disney a Sega sempre foi melhor em produzí-los!

[@ViniciusOliveira-ny4yt]

Não é produzido pela Sega, e sim pela Sony e Traveller's Tales.

[@antivoyage42597]

@@ViniciusOliveira-ny4yt verdade, e a Traveller's Tales colocou coisas impossiveis na versão para o Mega Drive, mais tarde, aconteceria o mesmo com Toy Story, o que fez com que a Sega pedisse ajuda à Traveller's Tales para fazer o Sonic 3D Blast

[@KuraIthys]

In the long run, I'm starting to think that ports are the worst possible things to really use to work out what a system was capable of. Many were designed with one system's abilities in mind then shoehorned into the other, usually with lazy, sloppy programming and minimal adaptations to the graphics, in spite of how differently the systems behaved. Which version ended up being the 'best' was often dictated by which system it started on, and how much time and experience the porting team had to get things done. Over and over we see games on both systems that have no equivalent on the other pull off tricks that these crossplatorm games wouldn't even dream of attempting, let alone actually using. And then there's just timing. A game released in 1995 is going to look better than one released in 1990 regardless of the system, because in 1990 you had to really think carefully about whether you could justify using a 1 megabyte ROM instead of a 512 kilobyte one, yet in 1995 you could easily justify using a 3 or 4 megabyte ROM, and it only started to become a bit dubious if you needed 6 megabytes or more. Regardless of the system, it's easy to underestimate just how much of a difference having 4 megabytes instead of 1 is to the games of this era... But if you actually feel like starting an argument I suspect the biggest advantage of the mega drive is not power, but simple understanding. Lots of programmers new how to write good 68000 code. You could even get reasonable results using a C compiler. (not a given on those relatively weak 80's and early 90's systems). The 65C816 however, was understood by only a few, and while it was related to the fairly common 6502 (used in the Apple II,commodore 64, Atari 2600 and NES amongst others), it had a lot of quirks that had nothing to do with the 6502 that people might understand from past systems. Using a C compiler was out of the question too if you wrote 65C816 code. Compilers barely existed, and the results if you did use one were so terrible you couldn't really risk the penalty to performance. Plus, the use of packed pixel graphics in the mega drive vs bitplane graphics in the snes made doing complex graphics work on the CPU in an snes even more difficult than it already was. Was the Mega Drive really more powerful? I have no idea, but it was definitely easier for most to understand. and if you understand something, you're more likely to write semi-decent code. And on a system where the CPU speed is measured in individual megahertz, writing good code is the single biggest factor in what you can get hardware to do. Did the Snes really NEED the SuperFX to be able to do 3d graphics? Possibly not. But it needed it to do them reliably enough for most commercial game programmers to be able to implement any 3d effects in any kind of reasonable time. Still, there's no way to settle this conclusively from looking at commercially produced games. Only a handful ever try for anything beyond mediocre in a technical sense. The game we are looking at here is a great example. Reasonably competent, but unremarkable, and the snes version was probably a fairly lazy, fast port of the Mega Drive version, because that's typically ''good enough' even if you could technically do better with more effort put in.

[@inceptional]

Yeah, if you look at a game like Rendering Ranger R2 on the SNES then you can get a much better idea of what it was technically capable of when a really skilled and dedicated programmer got to work on it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ip2adWVrfpusesU kzbin.info/www/bejne/ip2adWVrfpusesU And it's doing all that on a stock SNES with no slowdown at all.