Silent Hill 2 Remake: 35 GPU Performance Review - Frightens GPUs

[@Gabriel_Kito]

Didn't know Techpowerup had a youtube channel, subbed right away!

[@PadPoet]

So glad I found this channel. Sort videos that jump exactly to the point. Bless you people!

[@aurias01]

What a poorly optimized PC game. When a $2000 GPU can barely do 60fps.

[@50H3i1]

Also the quality of visuals don't justify the poor performance

[@picklelmao]

@@50H3i1 2/10 ragebait I guess some people play games using braille

[@NeedlessEscape]

No. It doesn't justify the performance​@@picklelmao

[@JBIGroup3D]

Lol look AMD GPUs,they showing their age or the architecture weaknesses,silent hill 2 it's not bad optimized it's just it has very strong geometry indoors and the software ray tracing Gi+reflections adding more performance hit to AMD cards

[@XiLock_Alotx]

Love all these backseat developers….😂😂

[@AshtonCoolman]

As usual this Nvidia "optimized" game is damn near broken on AMD GPUs by design

[@aurias01]

Just don't buy those games.

[@50H3i1]

Same as always

[@picklelmao]

at least if it was optimized properly on nvidia 💀

[@strife2408]

its gonna be like this on every UE5 games, these game using Lumen by default which is just Raytracing so Nvidia will always come on top because they have faster RT performance.

[@uncrunch398]

You only see the FPS advertised at the highest settings. Most likely it will run fine by adjusting them.

[@paulosena5673]

RIP good games. For a such performance hit, the graphics arent that good. There are a lot of better looking games that run much Faster than this game.

[@desmond3245]

This is what happens when devs rely solely on the technologies of an unoptimized engine instead of artistic direction.

[@B3tterEv3ryDay]

Their loss, i won't be getting this game, until it's fixed.

[@xaliven4365]

Was able to get to an average of 60 fps on my rx 6900 xt by reducing shadows and shader to medium. Using FSR 3 quality + Frame Generation lets me play at a steady 120 fps.

[@105rogue]

Did you try running the game on Intel's upscaler at ultra quality? I actually felt that it looked better.

[@gustavoroque8830]

What is frame generation? How do I use it?

[@xaliven4365]

@@gustavoroque8830 You can either install mods through Nexusmods or add a line to the engine.ini. If you search it up it's one of the first results

[@RazeacBroksnaerOfficial]

Thank you for the written review TPU now i can play Silent hill at 4fps with my 1660 super

[@MemoryLaneGaming5057]

here i thought i would be set with a 3080 for a long time. guess not. these ue5 games gotta chill. 1000+ is just too damn expensive just to have a solid experience on 1080p epic settings!!

[@DavideDavini]

How about lower the setting, mate? This game works okay on PS5, you have a 3080! Which is spades more powerful than a 2070 super. Not to mention that, I'm willing to bet, your CPU crushes the PS5's.

[@nilsholgersson7316]

You are set. Don't play anything on ultra/epic settings ever. If you play at 1440p always use DLSS Quality. 4K always DLSS Performance. Done.

[@DavideDavini]

@@nilsholgersson7316 crazy idea you got there. Not using max settings and DLSS. Mind blowing stuff. 🤣

[@lolcow6668]

@@DavideDaviniyou realize it was built to run better on the ps5 right? But cope harder Sony pony

[@squisherderheld]

As long as the graphics are pretty at 9 fps, this is a sure buy for me. GTFO Epic, please help devs optimize their games on UE5. Or just optimize UE5 so that games run with tolerable performance. Or is it just me who does not see a massive increase of graphic fidelity but just a massive tank in perf?

[@SemperValor]

Graphics look like crap... really sad so many are going UE5 because it's the most overhyped engine... the games all look bad have low res textures and cost too much performance to run ps3 graphics. Its a joke and ran by Nvidia clowns.

[@105rogue]

No I say you are spot on friend

[@silverwerewolf975]

Yup, Ue5 graphics are blurry as fk cus of temporal solutions

[@uncrunch398]

@@SemperValor How long would it take an open source engine to catch up to then become the best if game devs used and co developed it?

[@clamojoat8543]

not an epic game this was made by konami

[@105rogue]

This is crazy and a testament to just how bad UE5 is because the game doesn't even look that great. It by no means looks bad, however, there are games much older that look the same if not better and are far easier to run. Go play the Evil Within and it's sequel. They look just as good and are very easy to run.

[@walter1824]

Games should run at 100 fps by Mid Range GPU`s and the minimum acceptable level is 60 fps by Low End cards What the fuck is this dumpsterfire, how did the devs they think this was viable for a release ?!?!?

[@krecikopulos]

Adding upscalers would be appreciated

[@Unknownnn-g6z]

Something is wrong. I'm playing on native ultra 1440p without rt with my 7900 xtx. And I never drop below 70fps. It's running on aqua bios but even a stock bios should be a way more higher than 56 AVERAGE lol

[@Einuhreins]

They messed something up.i have a 7900xtx and a 4070 and the xtx is way faster. even when rt is on.

[@laszlodajka5946]

The yt channel the gaming setup also checked the game on an xtx on 2k resolution. He also got the approximate 4080 perf.

[@pf100andahalf]

The graphics are just okay in Silent Hill 2 and nothing special. There's no excuse for it being so hard to run.

[@laszlodajka5946]

Something must be off cause i checked xtx vids and there. they got much better numbers. It was up where it is supposed to be around the 4080/4080s mark

[@Einuhreins]

Sorry TPU but something went wrong in this benchmark. The AMD / Nvidia performance difference (rt off ) is just not what other benchmarks and my own benchmarks show. Are you sure you didnt mix AMD rt on with Nvidia RT off in that chart?

[@ahyeeyuhyuh]

I also don't understand why RT wasn't benchmarked in any resolution besides 4k.

[@TechPowerUp]

Full RT results available in the link.

[@jablkovyStrudel]

This benchmark is not accurate at all. I don't know where are they getting this data from but it's complete doo doo. I have a 6800XT and without supersampling on 1440p I get 50 - 60 FPS and I do not even have X3D CPU. Using FSR boosts my performance to 75-90 and even over 100 in some areas. Plus I just saw a comparassion of 3080 vs 4070 on 1440p with RT ON and those gpus were getting 65+ FPS.

[@ahyeeyuhyuh]

@@jablkovyStrudel yeah i get a fairly consistent 60fps on a 4080 with everything maxed, ray tracing, DLSS set to quality or balanced (i don't see a difference in quality or performance betwen the two). also running on a 5700G.

[@janosbukta4250]

they using 14900k thats the main problem. 7800x3d is a must. FASTEST GAMING PROCESSOR and if you disable SMT u get way faster cpu

[@onemor3809]

you can force FSR 3 frame gen in this game, although this option is not available in settings. And I would reccomend to set shadow quality to low. It boosts fps significantly and the game looks practically the same

[@SickRabbit327]

Another bad optimized ue5 game

[@DEEEEEZNUD]

how did you test vram usage? 0:20, in my playthrough 15 minutes in the game, it used around 12gb on my rx 7900gre with 3440x1440 and high texture setting, so weird

[@TechPowerUp]

Someone else reported that AMD was showing more usage, though your 1440p is higher res than ours. We tested with the 24GB 4090.

[@ConnorH2111]

​@@TechPowerUp AMD cards are more Vram hungry so you should consider testing Vram Usage on an XTX too and compare with the 4090.

[@KittyKittyPeowPeow]

My poor 2070 Super is showing its age, I'll probably upgrade once the 50XX series comes out.

[@nimaarg3066]

Another God of War Ragnarok situation. Why the fuck is raster so slow on AMD? It's almost like there are some hidden hands behind this. There are tons of UE5 titles where AMD obliterates NVIDIA. Somethjng seems really off here. This is a scummy move from the devs.

[@Bk_owns]

Where's your 4080 super

[@SemperValor]

Yep they do this on purpose... don't buy the game when they entertain this trash. Graphics look like crap too anyways. Low res textures done on purpose for Nvidia cards low vram.

[@arenzricodexd4409]

Ask AMD. If there is a foul play by game developer AMD most often will not be quiet about it.

[@clockworklegionaire2135]

when AMD blasts Nvidia 😈 vs when Nvidia blasts AMD 😭😭😭 you are a goofy

[@fortunefiderikumo]

Ask Amd to optimize their drivers or work with the devs more instead of making conspiracy theories in your head and getting angry

[@CrazO9111]

Would be great to see Full hD Ray Traycing performance with fsr/Dlss. Maybe you can do this too?

[@jetsp]

I would like to know which part of the game was tested, so I can do my tests here.. I think my 4080S has bad silicon.. It always fails my tests :(

[@roklaca3138]

Its not the question of gpu not ready but how much ue5/will trash the gpu for no appearant reason

[@uncrunch398]

While my GPU wouldn't hit the bottom of that list, more than likely it would run the title fine after adjusting settings. I do that anyway to save power and lower heat output.

[@TechPowerUp]

It's very scene dependent but low settings net 30-100% more performance.

[@CrazO9111]

My 4070Ti with DLSS Quality on full hd reach 100-120 fps average

[@Gakki_Aniki]

I finished the game but it had so many performance issues and poorly optimized, i was gonna drop the game but powered through it

[@ESKATEUK]

DLSS should be enabled which they’ve just not bothered even mentioning. The game looks no worse and in some ways better, and the performance is superior. My 3080 goes from 45fps at 1440p to way over 60fps with dlss quality enabled.

[@greenbow7888]

What's the point of giving RT on fps scores for only 4K Epic settings? ...... Only 4% of gamers use 4K. 25% use 1440p, so why not give us 1440p RT fps scores with epic settings, and 1080p has even higher adoption. Then you need to add DLSS and AMD FSR etc.

[@fatjawns3671]

Why only show ray tracing at 4k???

[@TechPowerUp]

The written review has all the resolutions, image quality tests, and performance comparisons!

[@fatjawns3671]

@@TechPowerUp ok thanks 🙏

[@ariaSincere]

Only these developers hate AMD GPUs

[@ahmedovomike6507]

I have RTX 4080 and i can't play this game because of stuttering

[@fabrb26]

They never tell us 0.1% lows. But for me its the best way to show stability. I rather play 30fps and solid 0.1% lows with that flat frametime graph than a choppy +100fps anyway

[@tsorakin]

I wish you would've showed the 1% lows. That's more telling of how this game runs. It's an absolute stutter fest

[@TechPowerUp]

1% lows are in the written review!

[@kostihouse]

Well it runs on a 3080 in 1440p dlss balanced, medium details, no rt, to never drop under 60 fps.. im playing with the 1st person mod, and with higher settings, the game response became so slow at times that i couldnt hit enemies properly and got killed repeatedly.. When outdoors, i switched dlss to quality

[@clamojoat8543]

you got a problem some ware because I got a 3080ti @ max with 4k with little issues. was told to lock the frame rate to reduce the stuttering but I only really experienced it @ the prison. rest of the game ran fine

[@kostihouse]

@@clamojoat8543 the only problem i have is a crappy monitor with slow response at low framerates, otherwise the fps numbers match the benchmarks

[@clamojoat8543]

@@kostihouse k well I get a solid 60 on mine except when in the prison.

[@kaystephan2610]

No RT, Native 1080 and a 4090 only manages 110Fps??? Wow. Devs really don't give a shit anymore, do they? Or maybe it's the publishers who don't want to grant the time/resources idk. Either, someone is f'ing up game ports. Also the game running SO MUCH WORSE on AMD is sus. Idk if NVIDIA secretly pays studios to f up optimization for AMD but this is a joke.

[@laszlodajka5946]

Other benchmarks show the xtx is upthere with the 4080 in perf. Something is mixed up here by accident

[@blazinhomo]

It's called cpu bottleneck numbnuts.

[@AWakeSleepY]

I get 130 FPS on ultra settings with RT on at 1440p with DLSS quality

[@guily6669]

My RX 6700XT is on fire 😵

[@fabrb26]

So i have to pay 800-900€ gpu for 1440p 60fps... I guess i stick to 1080p 30, after all PS3 wasn't that bad right... right ?!

[@100500daniel]

RX 6800 XT slower than the RTX 3070

[@MudSluggerBP]

Supports DLSS and for ….. then does no testing with those settings, also only low and epic with nothing in between 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@HoKcc]

4070 super beating 7900xtx is very sad. In addition, the game on amd cards uses more vram and 8gb is not enough for 1440p low. I wonder how the 8000 series will fare against ue5 games.

[@subhajitrouth5379]

may be it will be fixed after drivers update

[@laszlodajka5946]

The youtube channel the gaming setup tested the xtx on 2k and it was up there with the 4080 around 70 fps

[@marmar7089]

Wtf? Last 5 game benchmarks show that everything below 4070/7800xt isn't enough even for rast 1080p let alone ray tracing. Who is optimising this game and for what? Planed opsolence?

[@euX222X]

What a 5H177Y game, made by primates of gaming development, 1080p Lowest 7GB VRAM > 1080P Highest with RT ON 7.4GB... 😂🤣🤣

[@andersjjensen]

Ah, and Nvidia Spoiled Title I see....

[@maroosagaming]

this benchmark kinda seems BS to me, my friend is running this game on ultra with 60fps on a mf gtx1660 and here we have these numbers?

[@QuisquamHam]

Lol both consoles have amd gpu, devs still develop for nvidia, greasy palms somewhere, i have a rig with 4090 and oa rig with 7900xtx, both run like garbage in this game that looks like it is from 2018. Shader stutter on 4090 is worse oddly for me

[@laszlodajka5946]

How is the xtx perf? Cause in this benchmark sg is off about the results of xtx.

[@Ragssssss]

​@@laszlodajka5946 these are accurate results, I've a 4090 and I get exactly 54fps on average.

[@ecu4321]

2:42 is the reality test for current gen GPUs

[@lenpak]

Unreal engine has been a dumpster fire for years now, but because so many developers uses their engine, there’s no push to optimize it. Shader stutter compilation, and data streaming stutter is the norm now basically. It’s funny because one of the talking points was that ps5 pro will push gamers to PC, but crap like this will probably push PC gamer to consoles. You can’t win on either sides now.

[@Marc-zf3xv]

Woot another 30 fps targeted game.

[@ixb1]

640x480 at 2024 😂

[@Arsh3j]

Disgusting game.

[@tahmid4785]

Is it just me or are unreal engine 5 games just not that good. Like Black Myth Wukong is soo over sharpened, even silent hill 2 remake (at least in the clips I have seen) it also looks over sharpened (especially with the hair). Plus they always run like ass.

[@bigboymarket]

Woo cares about slient hill....I am preying they will release this game called project ill soon.........

[@SouthFacedWindows]

I will probably pick up the PS5 disc during black friday sale. At least no shared compilation stutters on console. This game does look good though on Epic 4K but thats too much tax on the GPU. What a shit show on optimisation!

[@LookkAttMee]

Games are not fun anymore with this f ue5 and the trash optimization

[@hydramarinee]

TechpowerUp needs to bring upscaling back into their reviews. Who plays cutting edge new games on native at high resolution unless they have 4090 or such. Almost everybody will use upscaling just to have smoother gameplay and a cooler case / room. It seems like TPU is doing these reviews for purely demonstrating the performance differences between GPUs. Those type of benchmarks are ok, especially when new GPUs come out. Whereas, some people like me look at benchmarks to see ballpark for their currently owned card. This doesnt help at all. UE5 is very demanding and squezes a lot of performance from upscalers compared to other engines.

[@Bk_owns]

My 4080 super says hi

[@JamesBronx-h3o]

Hey, TPU! Why do you manually changed latest poll's results called 'Next-Gen GPUs: What Matters Most to You?' I have this poll's result screenshot that shows that most important thing for poll respondents was the Raster Performance (34%) and the Pricing (14%). Now I see that poll results drastically changed one day: now allegedly Upscaling & Frame Gen became most popular thing (36%) and the Pricing is least important (3%). Now your poll shows that people allegedly would pay any price just for upscaling mojos instead of basic raster performance and decent pricing? Also you've removed poll's discussion thread. TPU, are you kidding? I'm paying $2200+ for GPUs like RTX 4090 and not to be scammed like a fool. Please stop this Joseph Goebbel's style manipulations, people are not so foolish. Me and my friends now thinking about quitting PC gaming due to such derogatory attitude; I'd just go with XBox instead. But I doubt you care. And please don't react aggressively or like you don't understand what I'm talking about

[@TechPowerUp]

This has been fixed after @Daven reported it in our forums. Not sure if that was you. The underlying reason was a coding mistake during a code migration. When the votes were tallied, they didn't get sorted first, so the wrong counts were linked to the answers. Adding OrderBy() solved the issue and the results output is correct now, no data was lost or corrupted. An extra character at the end of the Discussion link caused a 'page not found' error, this is fixed now, too.

[@JamesBronx-h3o]

@@TechPowerUp OK, thanks. I'm not Daven. At first this felt like a mockery, something scandalous - maybe even made on purpose. So...the data was actually...CORRUPTED)) I see...

[@silverwerewolf975]

Another shitgame gimping amd cards

[@FontoraDamiani]

Asus KO RTX 3070

[@matjakobs8612]

The game is a unpolished piece of💩 no matter what GPU

[@chnniceguy]

SH2 is really bad remake.

[@AvroBellow]

What the actual F$#@! is going on with this game? It sure doesn't look THAT good! A typical nVIDIA title, force existing customers to upgrade and break the game on Radeons and Arcs entirely. There's no reason why my XTX should only be able to play this rather mundane-looking game at only 1080p. CP2077 looks WAY better and I play that at 4K. Something is definitely wrong here.

[@GrainGrown]

*NVIDIA, not "nVidia".

[@AvroBellow]

@@GrainGrown Hahahaha! You're clearly a kid because "nVIDIA" was the proper way to spell it for almost 20 years and I'm hard-wired to spell it like that. If it bothers you, that says a lot more about you than it does about me, kid. 😁

[@GrainGrown]

@@AvroBellow Wrong.

[@AvroBellow]

@@GrainGrown Nope.

[@GrainGrown]

@@AvroBellow That "nVidia" is what fans have incorrectly used forever. It's literally the second sentence in NVIDIA's own guidelines: "NVIDIA is always written in upper case."

[@KnightLightMini]

eh, im using a Nividia 1660 and it runs fine. these numbers seem like guestimates

[@nossy232323]

AMD has left the building.

[@MakeSh00t]

7900XTX low end card at new games 4070ti is better.

[@laszlodajka5946]

Only in this benchmark.

[@victorsegoviapalacios4710]

RIP AMD

[@laszlodajka5946]

Or the benchmark results. In other benchmarks xtx does as it is supposed to

[@Fantomas24ARM]

UE5 is awesome engine. It uses so little VRAM and looks amazng at the same time.

[@awsmx1015]

It uses so little VRAM ?🤣

[@vampiszon6620]

there's always this one guy... :D

[@Miroslawkrynda6477]

Why does it matter if it uses little vram, if it runs like shit anyway even on high end cards? And it shouldn't even matter, since at this point only nvidia is putting less then 16gb on their 450$CAD+ GPUs

[@Fantomas24ARM]

@@Miroslawkrynda6477 it runs fine on my 3080 + ryzen 5700X, I completed the game yesterday.

[@awsmx1015]

@@Fantomas24ARM In simple words, it runs very well on a build which only like 5% of gamers have in the world.🙂

[@janosbukta4250]

using 14900k what a bullshit review. Start using 7800x3d . fastest gaming processor in gaming and if you disable SMT in bios u can get WAY faster than 14900k