Very clear explanation. I was always attaching the links of examsolution video for my students to look into a topic again. Research says that students are engaging more when the teacher works everything on the board. This is what is missing. Working out in real-time is very powerful. It is what made the older video soooo good. Thank you
@peppersalt42363 жыл бұрын
fantastic video. been struggling with this in maths and this video has helped lots. cheers
@rh6a2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video, now can apply it to some tricky questions in my homework!
@ExamSolutions_Maths2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! :)
@oscartimms98043 жыл бұрын
Cheers mate so clear the textbook had me lost
@ExamSolutions_Maths3 жыл бұрын
No problem buddy.
@munaaliii3 жыл бұрын
clear explanation thank youu. keep doing great job
@stephenfroggatt83523 жыл бұрын
Well done. Good, clear explanation.
@deangarratt49653 жыл бұрын
Very clear. Thanks.
@NeelPro9 Жыл бұрын
How do I identify a focus point inorder for me to equate mu and lambda and solve simultaneously?
@A--Hollow Жыл бұрын
Great video can you show how to prove that two vectors have a certain ratio
@ninjalennon12442 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@whatshelpedme Жыл бұрын
Very useful hack thanks !
@CrunchiestGranola3 жыл бұрын
great, systematic method. thanks my guy
@robinbagheera32443 жыл бұрын
Well done Michael, my brain hurts, but well done.
@ExamSolutions_Maths3 жыл бұрын
😅
@s.o.lcenter46883 жыл бұрын
@@ExamSolutions_Maths Clear explanations. Thanks
@ilovechicken46582 жыл бұрын
How do you know what direction to put the arrow in?
@harleenkaley22832 жыл бұрын
if its like AB is a, then the arrow should point to B as its going to B
@maia55392 жыл бұрын
in the question u can see there r arrows above the letters (like OA has an arrow on top of it). that arrow shows the direction, like from O -> A. then u can put the arrow on the diagram from O to A
@ilovechicken46582 жыл бұрын
Thanks guys
@samirtawil6402 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir
@Ps-pn9qg7 ай бұрын
Thank you
@jemma49383 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much :)
@tracytracy21753 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😁
@shresthashreya54183 жыл бұрын
amazing video young sir! is this the hardest a vector question can get? also how many marks is this?
@salwaimran34553 жыл бұрын
no there r more harder questions in vector
@sushruthravishankar23832 жыл бұрын
@@salwaimran3455 Please could you link some more questions bro! . I wanna try some as I have exams coming up. Cheers
@tasangerbakes Жыл бұрын
amazing
@cheapthrills58799 ай бұрын
Damn bro u OG
@shresthashreya54183 жыл бұрын
hi i thought exam solutions was an old man? miss him.
@Trus-Ty3 жыл бұрын
Don't worry the new guy is just as good
@shresthashreya54183 жыл бұрын
@@Trus-Ty where did he go :(((((
@JustRealAsf3 жыл бұрын
@@shresthashreya5418 he died ☹
@variszarins3 жыл бұрын
@@JustRealAsf no way :o
@afggg81942 жыл бұрын
@@shresthashreya5418 he left, now michael is taking over.
@evad1564 Жыл бұрын
I don’t understand any of this at all can someone recommended me what I should look at to conceptualise this
@ebukaz9 ай бұрын
Please I don't undestand why you are using scalar constants
@oscarico39216 күн бұрын
bcos theres an unknown coefficient, hence we are using scalar constants to prove it
@humanaccount27542 жыл бұрын
thank u
@chragrinette7238 Жыл бұрын
this made no sense
@Nickseeq113 жыл бұрын
Why is there non maths stuff in this vectors playlist? 😭 (after this video)
@Faith-zp5kf3 жыл бұрын
There's maths in the next video in the playlist for me.
@Sahilsharma-ce4ow3 жыл бұрын
❣️
@vascobishop335915 күн бұрын
I thought Lamba was a car?
@GodbornNoven10 ай бұрын
OABC is a parallelogram. By definition a parallelogram's diagonals intersect each other at their common midpoint. Boom done. It doesn't need proving. some properties of geometric shapes are simply axioms and you'd have to rely on other properties to be able to deduce these properties too so you're essentially trying to prove an assumption by making another assumption. Absolute bollocks i tell you
@sahil553 Жыл бұрын
why u longing the explanation
@daalhead10983 жыл бұрын
relax my friend, you talk so stiff. the reason why the original gentleman was so good is that his tone, voice and words were relaxed and informative.
@justaracoonchillinginatoilet692 жыл бұрын
i mean hes still conveying what he has to say well so i dont really see the issue personally. doesnt make much of a difference to me, but yea the previous guy has i guess a soothing quality to his voice but tbh it rlly doesnt do much, this guy is just as good at explaining