Fun fact, in the Eastern front German soldiers often used captured PPSH-41 sub machine guns as they had a higher rate of fire, a larger magazine and were told to be more reliable, whereas the Soviets liked to use the German MP40 because it was more handy and it was believed that it was of better quality
@tavish46993 жыл бұрын
i mean id rather have a ppsh that doesnt freeze and spits out lead then a kar 98 which´s bolt freezes
@firestorm1653 жыл бұрын
Both of these statements are correct
@legoeasycompany3 жыл бұрын
the grass is always greener on the otherside right?
@cisarovnajosefina45253 жыл бұрын
@@legoeasycompany i mean sometimes they had more captured ammo then their own so they would use captured guns as well
@MrPh303 жыл бұрын
Many Germans were issued Ppsh also,and many brought them with them westwards. Some Norwegian SS troops were issued Suomi when they were on Eastern Front,but they used Russian smgs aswell.
@tendymancommeth3 жыл бұрын
i have several friends who deployed to iraq and afganistan. I asked them a few times about using captured weapons. several times i heard a story about using capturd pistols. Junior enlisted are usually not issued a pistol, so they used captured ones. since it was strickly forbidden to bring them home, they turned them over to whichever unit relieved them, and the new guys would carry them.
@ShaneT.03313 жыл бұрын
I picked up a Russian Tokarev made in 1938 on a raid in Afghanistan. I was an 0331 machine gunner. Although I was qualified with the M9 I was never issued one outside of range qualification only Docs, officers sometimes higher ranking SNCOs like E8s or E9 had pistols in an infantry battalion. Anyways, I ended up putting it in one of those yellow amnesty boxes they had on base. Glad I did because before we left they did a 100% shake down where they basically check everything you have to dump all your CIF out then pack everything back up.
@kgapaneseschoolgirlb3 жыл бұрын
In the U.K., only officers or supporting soldiers (like a sniper or something) are issued a pistol. However, quite a few people I’ve met said they requested one from their commanding officer and got given one even though they were just big standard infantry, and they were also allowed to keep machetes, knives and stuff with them that they found, although all guns have to stay locked in the armoury and technically you have to keep knives and machetes in your barracks as well because you’re legally not really supposed to have them because we’re really anti-knives here.
@somethingsomething85113 жыл бұрын
@@kgapaneseschoolgirlb This seems silly. So if your gun gets FUBAR you're just screwed? Seems like everyone should have an issued side arm just in case
@kgapaneseschoolgirlb3 жыл бұрын
@@somethingsomething8511 It really isn’t silly considered I’m pointing out how in the U.K. we get the option to request a sidearm if we so desire (it probably also depends on the commanding officer…Most things here do) whereas in America, you have to scavenge for one, and then not get caught with it. Which one seems more ridiculous? Also, it’s extremely unlikely that your gun gets FUBAR. If it does, you probably have more things to worry about. Like, you’re not gonna drop the thing, anyone who says “oh well it’s possible” hasn’t met a soldier, especially not a British one, British soldiers being infamously known for being some of the most drilled and disciplined soldiers because we have to be because we don’t have the quantity as a luxury on our side. So the only way your gun will break is if you’re attacked, and you’re more likely to break than your gun is in that situation. But like I said, you can request a sidearm, if you’re close to the enemy you’re fighting you can probably nick one of their guns off of their corpse, or if you’re heading back to base, there’s usually spares. Pistols really don’t mean much in the grand scheme of things, it’s a waste of money, resources, and weight to make everyone carry one, that’s why it’s only officers who carry them because of, well tradition, and support roles who’s main weapon might not favour close quarters, like I said, snipers, who may just prefer a shotgun and some will just have an assaults rifle/DMR with them anyway.
@Grizzlytactics913 жыл бұрын
in fact, when i was in the army, we had really strict rules on weapons on base. the gun has to be registered to the post MP station, couldnt be loaded on base, couldnt be carried on base, was absolutely NOT allowed in the barracks and if you were a barracks troop like i was it had to be stored either at a friends house on base or in the armory. and if the company armorer wasnt around, you arent getting your gun.
@VictoryOrValhalla143 жыл бұрын
I had a captured MP5 broken down in my assault pack for months durning the invasion of Iraq until one of our guys shot his thumb off with a golden plated 1911(negligent discharge), we promptly ditched all our “trophies”. If I ever had the chance to go back I could find where I buried mine very easy.
@House_Roc3 жыл бұрын
@KELL II im no expert on this topic, but my guess is that it would be hella hard to regulate something like that
@litorres41253 жыл бұрын
@UCgmj93V_61ZW8Kl2M7BTfcQ basically customs, and it would be an nfa item=serviceman’s dog gets shot by the atf
@robertg.durant84893 жыл бұрын
That all sounds like a load of bs to me
@Necracudda3 жыл бұрын
@UCgmj93V_61ZW8Kl2M7BTfcQ it was basically contraband. I work for the Navy and as a maintainer the only thing I’m allowed to have on shore duty whilst on a base is a pocket knife no bigger than 5 inches or 12.7 centimeters.
@VictoryOrValhalla143 жыл бұрын
@@robertg.durant8489 it would to somebody that was never there
@johndoran32743 жыл бұрын
As a Gulf War veteran, I might disagree a little. I was attached to a mechanized division and was issued an M9. This irritated my father, a Vietnam vet, who said it wasn’t big enough. 3 weeks after arriving in Saudi Arabia, I got a package, in it was the 1911 he carried for 2 tours and my grandfather also carried from 1942 through 1945. I made it fit in the M9 holster with a little cutting and no one ever paid enough attention to it to catch on I guess. Getting it back home was the hard part, but I still have it.
@syrapianrule4073 жыл бұрын
How’d you get it back?
@vodago3 жыл бұрын
im also interested in this tale
@jacobmccandles17673 жыл бұрын
Same here. Oh, NO! Not in your flesh holster!?
@johndoran32743 жыл бұрын
@@jacobmccandles1767 no part of the object in question was hidden in my prison wallet :)
@johndoran32743 жыл бұрын
@@syrapianrule407 I was sent to Germany from Kuwait before coming back to the States. No shakedown before going to Germany, only had to ditch BDU’s. When I got there, we were allowed off base , so I FEDEXed it back home from a shop that I bought some souvenir crap in.
@SolidusSnaje3 жыл бұрын
My grandfather served in a US ARMY Armored division during Vietnam to which he wrote a letter home asking his father to buy him a Colt Python and have it shipped over my great-grandfather searched every gun shop in Oklahoma for one but no dice. His squad mate then wrote his father about this situation bought one for my grandfather drove it over 3 states to hand delivery to my great grandfather on his farm in Oklahoma to then have it shipped to Vietnam where he carried it for the remainder of his tour. Then when he was being shipped home got sick and left his bag and gun in the airport to go to the hospital came back some months later and the security guard at the airport had locked the bag up and happily handed it over to my grandfather. To this day it remains one of the most priceless objects in his position in his own words.
@XFizzlepop-Berrytwist2 жыл бұрын
Its crazy how simple things sound in older stories. A gun in a bag at an airport today would definitely be turned in, or stolen, maybe even charges pressed on someone. Sad times.
@Zure4672 жыл бұрын
@Kay 9/11/2001 knocked us into an alternate, albeit worse reality.
@chewcacachewpipi8879 Жыл бұрын
Back when airport security wasn't so fascistic and didnt make a huge fuss about firearms.
@hooks_and_horns Жыл бұрын
Fellow okie ay?
@Flaskandflora3 жыл бұрын
My grandpa brought heaps of weapons back from Germany in 1945 - he’d accepted the surrender of 8 German Army officers, and so he packed up a crate full of Lugers and a couple Kar98s and sent them home. Idk how he did it, but knowing him I assume he wasn’t expressly given permission to do so lol
@runlarryrun773 жыл бұрын
If he was friends with a creative Quartermaster they would have found a way easily enough.
@jollygreenjeff26403 жыл бұрын
That’s a war crime. Geneva convention says no spoils of war
@archer23133 жыл бұрын
@@jollygreenjeff2640 who tf cares
@princeimrahil65573 жыл бұрын
8 Germans? That's really impressive, I'd love to hear that story
@superkakan99013 жыл бұрын
@@jollygreenjeff2640 Geneva convention was created in 1949, so it wasn't a crime back then.
@kyledunn68533 жыл бұрын
2:13 represents Joe Mazzello as Eugene Sledge in episode 9 of The Pacific, where he fires his sidearm at a wounded Japanese soldier after a suicidal Banzai charge on Okinawa. Sledge actually carried a 1911 sent by his father before he landed at Peleliu and this actually happened at a place called Half Moon Hill. Both instances are noted in Eugene's book With The Old Breed. And Patton also carried a Colt 1903 pistol as well and used his Magnum revolver to shoot to donkeys during the Sicily campaign because the animals blocked one of his columns and got his soldiers killed by enemy planes.
@thepoglin84793 жыл бұрын
slayer of soldiers and farm animals alike.
@wubnub3 жыл бұрын
@@thepoglin8479 I'm telling you, that donkey had a gun.
@thekraken11733 жыл бұрын
@@wubnub That donkey had weapons of mass destruction
@unlondonbobby33363 жыл бұрын
I remember that scene it’s one of my favorite Episodes of the show
@fortnex99723 жыл бұрын
Are you sure about Sledge and the 1911?? In the TV show is a 45 Long Colt revolver. I dont have the book!!!
@braydenchan3023 жыл бұрын
I love how they depicted a single action revolver as a double action revolver
@someonestolemyname3 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to comment about it, it is quite a major mistake. always check the comment section to see if someone has already commented about it.
@JohnSmith-xv2ob3 жыл бұрын
Psst, they made the Colt Double Action, which is a Single Action Army but double action... Not super popular but pretty sure it exists... Though to be fair, Patton's was an SAA... so...
@nicknaylor98953 жыл бұрын
Beat me to it. Oh well, I’m leaving my comment explaining that.
@dravenocklost42533 жыл бұрын
@@JohnSmith-xv2ob What's an SAA?
@JohnSmith-xv2ob3 жыл бұрын
@@dravenocklost4253 Single Action Army
@Chesher7773 жыл бұрын
A friend of mine who was in the US Army Engineers, who was deployed in Iraq during the second invasion, man, they looted and kept all kinds of stuff, mainly for ease of use, They found a sawn off stock12 gauge pump shotgun, which they kept and used in leu of a master key as their battalion wasn't issued shotguns, and even found a old soviet twin barreled AA gun, that they salvaged with ammo out of a school that was being used as an ammo depot by the Iraq military, and then the Taliban, the AA gun was taken back to the post they were stationed at, restored, and they mounted it above the installations main gate, apparently they shredded a few VBIED's before the Taliban figured they couldn't get a car-bomb close enough to the base to do any damage. While its usually frowned upon to use captured equipment, it really depends on the unit and the situation, and if its case of "We don't have any of this type of weapon, it has ammo, is in good condition, and we could use one for specific situations" its easy enough to hide in a truck or Humvee, or to just convince whoever's running the armory to hold onto them for when they are needed.
@Tonyx.yt.3 жыл бұрын
probably the ZPU-2 , dual barrel 14.5mm heavy machine gun, with a bullet almost twice as powerfull as 50 bmg
@vixnix28123 жыл бұрын
So this is gonna sound odd but I have a buddy who tells the exact same story, he was part of the combat engineer division that restored the ackack…. Did you buddy happen to know a batch of engineers with a hummve that was “hillbilly armored” and said armor was applied by the use of “explosive welding”? Aka C4 welding
@EricToTheScionti3 жыл бұрын
I will be reporting these crimes Jk
@EricToTheScionti3 жыл бұрын
@@vixnix2812 small world
@MagnumLoadedTractor2 жыл бұрын
Yugoslav wars:everyone uses the same weapons cuz UN didn't deliver anything in 5.56
@shastaham76303 жыл бұрын
My son served as a combat MP In Iraq. He originally carried a government issued Mossberg Model 500 12 Guage shotgun and a Beretta 9 mm pistol. Early in his deployment, he obtained a modified Mossberg 500 with a shortened IC barrel, extended magazine tube, but pad and saddle ammo carrier. Strangely, he was also able to get his hands on a stainless steel Colt Model 1911A1 .45 caliber pistol with several magazines. Subsequently, his "care packages" began to include a box or two of pistol (SJHP) or shotgun (#2 buckshot or slugs) ammo. When he returned home, the weapons were left with civilian contractors who shipped them to him. He still has them, twenty years later.
@Dave1-083 жыл бұрын
Before I deployed to Afghanistan in 2008, there was talk of guys being allowed to bring over our personal handguns for our tour. This was considered due to fact that there were very few pistols available to the entire Canadian battle group at that time. Most of the issued pistols were the aging Browning 9mm High Power built in the 1950s, and most of those were snatched up by the support troops who never left Kandahar Airfield. In the end, the higher-ups killed the plan for us to bring over our own guns and we went in with only two handguns for a platoon of 40 guys.
@kurousagi81553 жыл бұрын
That sucks. It doesn’t even sound like it would cost extra for Canadian military to implement the policy.
@midorithefestivegardevoir67273 жыл бұрын
Mom said it's my turn on the only two government issued handguns.
@killertruth1863 жыл бұрын
I would see that the higher ups wanted to get their soldiers killed. If that was really important.
@NL-gn2dl3 жыл бұрын
Imaging calling the RCMP for ATT: You: Hi, I am requesting a long-term ATT to transport my Sig Sauer to a different country. RCMP: Ok, you are going to the United States? You: Well, actually that will be the first stop, and then we fly to Afghan ... RCMP: ... A firearms inspector will visit you shortly. Have a nice day!
@marcus40463 жыл бұрын
at least you were better off then sargent johnson...his platoon had 2 sticks...and a rock...they had to share the rock.
@falangistinapanzeriii52863 жыл бұрын
me personally i actually like the idea of using guns from home as it can boost morale by bringing soldiers closer to home while on duty
@reform-revolution3 жыл бұрын
until it jams cause civilian weapons dont have the same standards and gets the guy killed .... of course morale is a secondary concern at that point
@thekraken11733 жыл бұрын
@@reform-revolution Bruh military standards means the standards of the cheapest bidder
@kt006283 жыл бұрын
@@reform-revolution you've obviously never seen how shot out some military weapons get.
@reform-revolution3 жыл бұрын
@@thekraken1173 civilian weapons arent designed to do the same things we demand from military equipment ..... its why the Ross rifle failed it was literally a civilian weapon by design and failed
@reform-revolution3 жыл бұрын
@@kt00628 compare them to civilian weapons with the same wear and tear and you see a massive difference kid
@j.d.unlisted86683 жыл бұрын
A friend of mine, his grandfather was in WWII and "liberated" a Vis 35 Radom pistol from a dead German. He used it as his side arm throughout the war and brought it back home with him after the war was over. My friend received the pistol after his grandfather died and he will pass it on to his son one of these days.
@VAMO_-tn9yv3 жыл бұрын
My dad his friend bought a luger from a vet that was in the resistance in Belgium . He got (stoled) the luger from a german officer.
@Commrade-DOGE3 жыл бұрын
Interesting… I looked up the pistol.. and it’s POLISH! I’m guessing the officer must’ve taken it off of a polish officer in 1939 Had it until he died and your friends grand father must’ve been like: this isn’t a Luger! And then realized it isn’t a 1911
@INeverMetAGunIDidntLike3 жыл бұрын
@@Commrade-DOGE the Germans captured the Radom factory and kept it running so they could issue them to their own troops.
@olgagaming55443 жыл бұрын
Funny, imagine you're making a pistol in Polish factory and it ends up used by a german oficer, next it ends up on another continent as family memorabilia.. the questions is - did you shoot it? :P
@ianfrink4443 жыл бұрын
My grandpa also captured a Vis 35, along with a P38. Have both of them today.
@josephstaggs45453 жыл бұрын
My buddy in the army told me about his grandpa in Vietnam. Apparently he had his wife mail his lever action rifle to him, piece by piece. Not sure how true this is but it's cool to think about.
@randomguy72953 жыл бұрын
Damn bro thats foking awesome
@kingpest133 жыл бұрын
My dad carried a .44 revolver in Vietnam. Said he was an incredible shot with that gun so he carried it. He has a purple heart. He doesn't talk a lot about it, once in a while I'll get a story out of him. Terrific father, I'm a very lucky man to have him as an example. Hope desperately that my boys feel even half as proud of their father as I do of mine. Y'all, do good in this world.
@aniruudhh3 жыл бұрын
The government: “you’re not supposed to carry your own guns” Soldiers: *”im gonna pretend i didnt see that”*
@t-posetimmy68343 жыл бұрын
@Gепshiп lмрасt 🅥 bro wtf are you doing here this isn't even a Genshin related video
@jusjetz3 жыл бұрын
What’s that? “Carry your own guns?” Ok 👍🏻
@jorgenflorgen86763 жыл бұрын
@@t-posetimmy6834 it's a bot so it automatically spams comments everywhere
@t-posetimmy68343 жыл бұрын
@@jorgenflorgen8676 yeah I've never seen it outside of a Genshin video
@danteburns71183 жыл бұрын
"That sounds like a suggestion"
@Dan_Ben_Michael3 жыл бұрын
Not a captured weapon but my father has a home made club my great uncle used at Gallipoli and in the trenches on the Western Front when he was in the AIF during WWI. Hand to hand combat was quite common in the confined spaces of a trench and the SMLE .303 were quite cumbersome in such tight confines so they would resort to using knives, bayonets, entrenching tools and home made weapons. It’s quite an interesting artefact made from hardwood and has a leather grip with a wrist strap as well as hobnails dotted around the business end, perfect for bashing the brains out of Jerry and Johnny Turk alike. War movies seem to gloss over the brutal nature of hand to hand combat.
@Pandishi3 жыл бұрын
What a relic, some of my favourite stories from the great war are the shenanigans the Anzac Diggers got up to.
@duderitoz69533 жыл бұрын
Ive got a captured katana brought home by my grandfathers father as well as a few german pieces of equipment
@Frog_Mob_Boss3 жыл бұрын
Except for Inglorious Bastards. The Bear Jew scene came to mind when I started reading your comment.
@dubfez_92563 жыл бұрын
watch the tv show 'Gallipoli' and the film 'The Water Diviner', best scenes that cover what you mention.
@andrejansen32813 жыл бұрын
@@dubfez_9256 Yes to both
@johnrandolph19893 жыл бұрын
My old wood shop teacher kept his M72 launcher tube from his time in NAM displayed in his office by the window for all to see, you can imagine how much that freaked out the freshmen.
@theirishempire49523 жыл бұрын
Thats the American experience I know, teacher is a war veteran with his war trophiea in the classroom
@pepelepew81473 жыл бұрын
Could you imagine how people would lose their mind if that was to happen now
@johnrandolph19893 жыл бұрын
@@pepelepew8147 that is IF wood shop/carpentry is part of 2020's curriculum.
@snailordskates3843 жыл бұрын
@@johnrandolph1989 it’s not, photoshop is though! -.-
@EzekiesAcheron3 жыл бұрын
@@johnrandolph1989 It is in schools lucky enough to have one. My old middleschool had one.
@Xtorin_Housecat_Ohern3 жыл бұрын
i personally know a Vietnam Vet who smuggled a .264 magnum hunting rifle into Vietnam, he was a Jet mechanic so he never saw much in the way of direct combat, but occasionally when his airbase would receive harassing fire he'd fire back with it. in his own words the .264 was a heavy enough bullet that it didn't matter if there were some leaves in the way, and the high velocity made up for his lack of marksmanship skills.
@kennethkellogg65563 жыл бұрын
In the Civil War, privately purchased or captured guns were frequently superior to the government-issued ones. The prime example is the Henry rifle, "that was loaded on Sunday and fired all week". It was a repeating rifle with a 16-shot magazine, capable of immensely greater rates of fire than muzzle-loading weapons. (And the metal cartridges were highly resistant to rain.) The U.S. issued very few of them, because the supply officers feared they would not be able to provide enough cartridges.
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
In napoleonic Europe, certain units would get specialist weapons. Either because they were expensive, well-suited for a specialist role or required more of the soldier.
@wolfmanhcc2 жыл бұрын
Can't trust anything mass produced at a government spec.
@kyletroknya24192 жыл бұрын
What kind of guns did the soldiers use?
@kennethkellogg65562 жыл бұрын
@@kyletroknya2419 That's a big subject. The usual infantry weapon on both sides was the .58 caliber rifled musket. The South captured the rifle works at Harpers Ferry at the outset of the war, but still found it difficult to produce enough of these weapons. Happily for them , Enfield in England also made a .58 caliber musket, and a number of them were carried in by blockade runners. Still, in the early battles flintlock smoothbores were fairly common, especially in the South. There were also more specialized weapons, such as the Whitworth rifle, quite possibly the most accurate firearm in the world at that time, capable of killing at 1,000 yards range. The North developed breech-loading weapons such as the Henry rifle I mentioned and the Sharps carbine. In the late war, the Sharps became a common weapon for Northern cavalry, who would ride to an advantageous position, and then dismount and fight as infantry. the Confederacy could not match the repeating rifles in quantity, for they needed copper for the brass cartridges, which the South was badly short of. Speaking of cavalry weapons, both sides soon adopted revolvers instead of sabers. Most of the revolvers were cap-and-ball types: Smith and Wesson controlled a key patent for metal-cartridge revolvers, and unaccountable only produced .22 caliber models during the Civil War. This was not a useful size for the battlefield, especially as no propellant more advanced than classic black powder was available at the time.
@not1not2but33 жыл бұрын
Based on all other simple history videos I was expecting something more like this. “ ….guns at home , stayed at home….except for Johnny “Homegun” Smith who in the 2004 battle of Faluja used is own .410 shotgun, acquired from home, piece by piece, smuggled in through cans wintergreen grizzly chewing tobacco. Johnny was a thrice divorced, crusty marine Lcpl with 4 kids at home. At just the age of 20, Johnny went on the kill 45 insurgents using homemade birdshot made from saddams teeth and used toilet paper. Johnny wouldn’t be recognized for his valor until many years later, when he was awarded to Medal of Honor”
@cameronbooker4453 жыл бұрын
Thats excellent!! Hahaha better than any .25 zip gun story I could ever make up
@candle_eatist3 жыл бұрын
God bless johnny homegun, he's gonna need it in his next battle against aliens in the 2243 battle of the colonies, where the prophets predicted that he will use his grandfather's M1911A1 he smuggled out of vietnam to singlehandedly destroy a battle cruiser.
@jacobmccandles17673 жыл бұрын
That was so good I actually read it in the simple history narrator's voice.
@not1not2but33 жыл бұрын
@@jacobmccandles1767 Thats the only way to do it, because I wrote it in his voice.
@97stratocaster213 жыл бұрын
This comment, and all the replies just made my day. This is too funny.
@tibovandeneeckhoudt64173 жыл бұрын
It's always nice to learn news things from this channel
@tibovandeneeckhoudt64173 жыл бұрын
@Gепshiп lмрасt 🅥 😂😂 I thought it was a rick roll
@Musicandstuffff3 жыл бұрын
Toffe comment
@tibovandeneeckhoudt64173 жыл бұрын
@@Musicandstuffff thx
@thetsartank3 жыл бұрын
Short of the long, you have more ammo of enemies' guns while in their territory. For the gifts tho, it is like wearing a birthday gift hat at an extremely sunny day.
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
Imperial Japan tried to make that official doctrine. Units would be undersupplied with the expectation to scavenge british or US depots as they defeated them. That didn't work when imperial units failed to take a supply dump and their own stocks ran out.
@atlanticsquib72323 жыл бұрын
@@SusCalvin kind of like how supposedly (I have no sources to confirm this) Russians sent in a group of armed soldiers followed by unarmed soldiers to pick up and use the weapons of the fallen then a group of armed soldiers behind them to shoot at any unarmed deserters
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
@@atlanticsquib7232 We think that's a myth about small arms. They produce tons of nagants through the war, there's a reason it's so easy to get a nagant. They get a bunch of lend-lease trucks and jeeps. Something they do is form penal units of sorts. People trying to desert can be just sent back instead. The purges before the war mostly affected the officer corps and the party hierarchy itself.
@atlanticsquib72323 жыл бұрын
@@SusCalvin ahh okay, good to know!
@NefariousElasticity3 жыл бұрын
It's kind of a shame trophy weapon recovery isn't a thing anymore. IIRC in WW2, soldiers could actually fill out a form to have a captured weapon shipped home, but by the time of the Korean war, US firearms restrictions against foreign import and automatic weapons were starting to fall into place in a big way, so it was mostly thrown out. An AK might not seem like as much of a valuable relic as a German K98k today, but give it 80 years.
@atlanticsquib72323 жыл бұрын
A true Russian made AK47 with all original parts is pretty damn rare
@giovannicervantes20533 жыл бұрын
@@atlanticsquib7232 what type are we talkin about like right off the production line 47 or probably one of the reproduction ones from the 50s like the akm
@atlanticsquib72323 жыл бұрын
@@giovannicervantes2053 yes the AK47 Type 1’s. They are incredibly rare to find especially with all original parts
@giovannicervantes20533 жыл бұрын
@@atlanticsquib7232 Jesus
@septimus75243 жыл бұрын
@@giovannicervantes2053 And the ones that do still exist also still fire like they're brand new. Kalashnikov was a damn genius I'll give him that. (Helps that the M1 GARAND was the primary inspiration. Both the AK and M1 use nearly identical rotating bolts, right down to the locking lug being exactly the same shape, among other similarities. Like being a long stroke gas system)
@manoflego1233 жыл бұрын
My family actually still has a properly acquired trophy weapon. My great grandfather snagged an German P38 and brought it back with all the required paperwork and everything.
@jwright17763 жыл бұрын
My grandpa was a tank mechanic in Vietnam. He made it to lance corporal, but somehow got demoted to PFC before he came home. He was issued a standard M16 along with an M1911A1 because he’d be working in the confined space under a tank. That 1911 saved his life many a time, and when he sent his sea bag home, he wrapped the 1911 in tin foil and stuck it in there. It made it home, along with him two weeks after the bag got home. Now the 1911 is slotted to go to me when he passes.
@tavish46993 жыл бұрын
isnt that still US property ?
@kachel3133 жыл бұрын
@@tavish4699 Not anymore.
@parkerbeebe43833 жыл бұрын
That is awesome both your grandpa, being a tank mechanic, and the gun as well. Respect for your grandpa’s service
@parkerbeebe43833 жыл бұрын
@@kachel313 lol
@Yustax3 жыл бұрын
@@tavish4699 that's our property. We paid for it with our taxes
@jtukko3 жыл бұрын
Simo Häyhä famously used his own personal rifle he had for years before the war. Seemed to work well.
@Sure_You_Betcha3 жыл бұрын
Simo Hayha owned his service weapon because he purchased it from the military... This was common practice in Finland. And based on his kill count Id say it worked very well lol.
@johnanth3 жыл бұрын
A rifle is a tool, so it's only as good as what you make of it :) Simo made good with it, as he would have with any working rifle!
@extragoogleaccount60613 жыл бұрын
@@Sure_You_Betcha Very true. And I've also learned that a decent amount of his kills came from the Finnish submachine gun. Which is kinda crazy considering I had always pictured him as a "deep cover" sniper, ya know, with the stories of holding snow in his mouth so his breath wouldn't show. I guess some ambushes were close enough to use the subgun and you could probably get single shots with a bit of practice.
@Shadow_Hawk_Streaming3 жыл бұрын
I mean it was his issued rifle, but yeah, it was his throughout his training right till the end of the war
@shaider19823 жыл бұрын
He fought inside Finland. Pretty easy to get parts of it.
@kellywright5403 жыл бұрын
My Dad had fought in Patton's Third Army, Fourth Armored Division and his MOS was a Scout. He had told me that early in the fall of 1944, they had captured a German supply dump. Not only did they capture plenty of booze but he also came across crates of MP40's and pre-filled magazines. He said that he grabbed one of these and a bunch of filled magazines and carried that weapon for several months. He said that it was lighter than the Thompson submachine gun, carried more rounds the the M1 Carbine and was just as reliable as both of them. I think he ditched that by the time of the Ardennes offensive when the magazines ran out and went back to the Thompson and the M1 Garand. He didn't like the M1 Carbine during the winter because he had seen first hand that the M1 round sometimes would not penetrate the frozen clothes of the Germans.
@neft54493 жыл бұрын
They mighty M1 didn't have enough penetration? Shocker
@Mike-mt4ln3 жыл бұрын
@@neft5449 I’m assuming he’s referring to the carbine round not a full power .30-06
@hoppinggnomethe41543 жыл бұрын
this sounds like fabricated BS
@chrisidoo3 жыл бұрын
@@hoppinggnomethe4154 And you're free to believe so, buddy.
@bluecaptainIT3 жыл бұрын
@@chrisidoo well, aschtually, the fact that heavy clothing can stop a .30 carbine round has been debunked several times. Main causes that made soldiers believe it: they missed their shots or the enemy was high on drug
@jacobackley5023 жыл бұрын
This was common practice in Vietnam. My great uncle (grandpa's brother) took a stolen ithaca shotgun to Vietnam and came back with a Hi Power pistol that he traded for. I believe he still has it loaded with the same 13 rounds he brought back with it.
@RsRj-qd2cg3 жыл бұрын
3:53 it became impossible for US personnel to carry privately purchased guns. But many still carried Eastern Bloc weapons captured from insurgents in combat. They were used as "beater" or "throwaway" guns in combat. When the beater broke down or ran out of ammo, they'd switch back to their primary weapon.
@XFizzlepop-Berrytwist2 жыл бұрын
I mean sounds smart if you ask me? Save your own ammo/resources, whilst draining the enemies.
@soulsafe2 жыл бұрын
@@XFizzlepop-Berrytwist It was Sun Tsu that said "A cart of the enemies supplies is worth 3 of your own, for you do not have to worry about movement to and from the area of delivery" to paraphrase.
@khaianslego82843 жыл бұрын
My guy can’t take his golden deagle with him. 😥
@weplo15973 жыл бұрын
Dude only wanted to experience COD MW golden deagle in real life smh.
@khaianslego82843 жыл бұрын
@@weplo1597 what a shame 😩
@analizin3 жыл бұрын
Literally 1984 😭
@swagpyro473 жыл бұрын
Dude grinded
@mrmicro223 жыл бұрын
Excuse me, I thought this was America!
@TheMemeDynamics3 жыл бұрын
0:29 Random drill sergeant: God dammit Forrest! That's a new company record! Why did you do it this fast?!
@a.h.s.30063 жыл бұрын
You told me to, drill sergeant?
@M_Alistair3 жыл бұрын
disassemblethatweaponandcontinue!
@GeorgeSemel3 жыл бұрын
@@a.h.s.3006 You are going to be a 20-star general Private Gump!
@jehuirasales35883 жыл бұрын
Guummmmmpppp!!!
@lasombra14693 жыл бұрын
Run Forrest run!
@fatalsiege.3 жыл бұрын
Love simple history been watching for years
@Mustang_19653 жыл бұрын
It's heartwarming whenever you see someone open a present and it's his special revolver from home. Very wholesome :)
@Dorkyorcy3 жыл бұрын
Just as enjoyable as the video from a great channel are the stories posted in the comments from soldiers and their family. Thanks everyone, keeping history alive 😊
@qui-gonjinn50143 жыл бұрын
I have a mauser model 98 rifle that was captured during ww2. A good friend of my dad gave it to me because he knew that I like history.
@Slenderslayer3513 жыл бұрын
Kar98k? That's a reliable bolt action rifle, ever thought of going hunting with it?
@qui-gonjinn50143 жыл бұрын
@@Slenderslayer351 There's some rust on it, I was just going to clean it and put it on display.
@Wolf-wc1js3 жыл бұрын
Wait is it a K98K or a G98? Because I know that last ditch weapons issued out in WW2 including WW1 era G98s
@tavish46993 жыл бұрын
@@Wolf-wc1js wasnt last ditch, the g98 was in common service with rear line troops
@Slenderslayer3513 жыл бұрын
@@qui-gonjinn5014 You should show it off on your channel
@micahistory3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting topic, I never really thought about this topic although it makes sense that some soldiers would use guns from home
@TeRenner1233 жыл бұрын
simo Häyeyä the White Death used his own rifle turing the winter war
@Adam-oh3vu3 жыл бұрын
Also a soldier would be more comfortable with a gun from home because they have most likely spent more time with it.
@micahistory3 жыл бұрын
@@Adam-oh3vu true
@ace17763 жыл бұрын
Patton: This here’s my killing gun. I also got a cooking gun, cleaning gun, gun for sleeping and of course my Sunday school gun.
@knightmarespawn26903 жыл бұрын
@Mika used for . . . "making" more guns
@kaptinbarfbeerd13173 жыл бұрын
Was there a pizza making gun by any chance?
@putter4713 жыл бұрын
“Single action revolver” shows Patton firing multiple rounds without pulling back the hammer
@Gojiro73 жыл бұрын
as annoying to see as that is, I'm sure the person animating this knows little to nothing about how guns actually work.
@TKDragon753 жыл бұрын
Since my Grandfather fought a war where there was no standard issue weapons, he used a captured British Sub Machine Gun, the Sten MK2. Military took it though after the Indonesian War of Independence when Suharto took power over the government. Guess a dictator didn't like the idea of having a populace that included armed war veterans. Though I'm pretty sure we may have some of the melee weapons still. Soldiers of the Indonesian army from 1945-1949 still used spears and swords if they couldn't get a gun or ran out of ammo. A lot of battles ended up with thousands of revolutionaries getting mowed down by Dutch or British machine gun fire, but on a few occasions they'd actually win, albiet with like 10 times as many losses, but a win is a win.
@Just_Some_Guy_with_a_Mustache3 жыл бұрын
3:53 "What do you think you're doing using the Golden Pistol, son?!" "I...I just..." "Don't you know it's unfair to use the Golden Gun? It's too OP!" "What if the enemy is all Oddjob?"
@Gremlor3 жыл бұрын
@Jayden Dicritan sussy baka
@Elkabong537083 жыл бұрын
Thats not just ANY golden pistol, but one of the rare five golden Pistols awarded by Willy Wonka himself!
@bigdaddy71193 жыл бұрын
I don’t know about now, but during Desert Storm, and combat deployments up to the late 90’s, we could fill out the appropriate paperwork and carry POW’s (personally owned weapons) provided they didn’t violate the Geneva Convention, we supplied our own ammo (if it wasn’t chambered in a common NATO caliber, and FMJ, no hollow points), and at our own risk because Uncle Sam wouldn’t reimburse you if it got damaged, lost or destroyed. I know of quite a few guys that were packing their own personal .357/.44 Mags, as well as some of us (me included) 1911 style .45 ACP’s. The .45 was ideal because we still had plenty of ammo for it and in theater, due to the fact that they broke out a lot of M-3 grease guns for tank crews and others, which were chambered in God’s caliber. 😁
@aj37513 жыл бұрын
Grease Guns in Desert Storm? Really?
@neft54493 жыл бұрын
@@aj3751 I think that was the last time they saw action but still crazy that they were used so extensively
@brent09353 жыл бұрын
@@aj3751 a lot of tankers were still issued M-3’s as short barrel m-4s weren’t super common yet.
@danball453 жыл бұрын
I carried my POW .45
@TheTitaniumSkull3 жыл бұрын
@@aj3751 Grease Guns had still been in the Army inventory during the 90s and then removed at the end of the 90s. At the end the only soldiers issued Grease Guns was usually Mechanics operating recovery vehicles. I know because my section had 2 of them assigned to the tracked recovery vehicle crew because of the very cramped space. Reason the Great Gun was discontinued was because the 1911 was also discontinued for the M9 and the military had no plans to keep .45 in inventory only for one specific firearm.
@canaluludorel58383 жыл бұрын
In 'The Pacific' Sledgehammer killed an enemy soldier with his dad's WW1 M1917 revolver
@idontcareanymore27543 жыл бұрын
The Military used to allow legally bringing home war trophies of knives,handguns, bolt action and some semi automatic rifles. You just had to fill out the forms. I'm pretty sure that practice stopped after Vietnam.
@jacobmccandles17673 жыл бұрын
My Dad used a smuggled Winchester M-1897 pump shotgun to good effect in WWII in the Pacific. It was a standard bird shooter sawed off even with the end of the magazine tube. I have his foot locker, and there are still some galvanized steel-hulled buckshot shells in there.
@landenherteux23503 жыл бұрын
Until now. Since the Army discontinued standard issue side arms a provision was put into place that if a soldier felt like carrying a sidearm he has to provide his own. Including ammunition.
@zulubob58243 жыл бұрын
WTH???
@landenherteux23503 жыл бұрын
@@zulubob5824 indeed. But the Army's logic is pretty sound. If you are in combat at ranges to make effective use of a sidearm you are already fucked. So it's not really worth carrying an extra pound or two on top of between 75-100 pounds of gear.
@landenherteux23503 жыл бұрын
Can you also imagine getting .45 ACP across seas into a combat zone on your own dime?
@Trek0013 жыл бұрын
@@landenherteux2350 "Hi, this is FedEx... How may I help you?"
@landenherteux23503 жыл бұрын
@@Trek001 I see you have my rocket sheep.
@benbrgr93 жыл бұрын
Best story of Patton. His men were pinned on a beachhead in North Africa. So he marched up, started barking orders and fought alongside his men using his ivory pistols. The man was the ultimate mad lad
@kenyenjones3 жыл бұрын
One of my greatuncles was a merchant marine and one time while he was on leave in France he found a dead German soldier while walking along a beach. That soldier had a machine gun (I don't know what model) that he broke down and sent home piece by piece. After the war he returned home and he and my grandfather reassembled it, then took it to a quarry where they fired an entire belt of ammunition from it. Whatever model it was fired so fast that it scred them and they reconfigured the weapon so that it could only ever fire one shot at a time after that. I wish I knew more about it, but after his death his wife went a bit insane and took it out on the front lawn to take potshots at people with it.
@analizin3 жыл бұрын
No way Was it a MG-42? Or maybe a MG-34?
@kenyenjones3 жыл бұрын
@@analizin I don't know. He died before I was born and after his wife fire on people it was confiscated by the police. Since no one in my family have the proper licenses to legally own the weapon I believe it was either put on auction or destroyed.
@analizin3 жыл бұрын
@@kenyenjones Ngl, it's quite a shame. If only things went another way...
@jacobmccandles17673 жыл бұрын
Sounds like an MG-42, although an MG-15 would also fire quite fast. Very few MG-15s were used on the ground though.
@ZawZaw-yb3nf3 жыл бұрын
could also be an FG42. if the soldier was a paratrooper. but that's unlikely, since there were only 7000~ made
@TheNinjaDC3 жыл бұрын
Part of this is do to, contrary to popular myth, front line soldiers were rarely issued handguns. Handguns were intended for officers, MPs, special forces, and auxiliary support troops. However, regular soldiers obviously still liked having them for protection, especially in the bolt action era.
@Noredlac_3 жыл бұрын
It's mostly because using the enemy's weapons confuses both sides and it's not a good idea having to tell your friendlies that its you every time
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
The only people who use them regularly around here are drivers/tankers/pilots. Anyone who sits in a confined space where they can't haul up an automatic carbine easily. MPs use exactly the same stuff as infantry/light infantry. They walk around with carbines. Same with artillerists, base security, motor pool dudes, they rely on their carbines if their base is assaulted or infiltrated. Officers in the field carry carbines. Auxiliary security troops and police used automatic carbines or SMGs as well. They just had an older generation, like last year's model. There was no reason to give them useless pistols instead of making more modern carbines.
@wolfmanhcc2 жыл бұрын
Switching to a side arm is often faster than reloading.
@T13-o7u3 жыл бұрын
In my unit, everyone had a personal weapon (usually handgun). As for AK's, some guys liked them because when shooting at night, the enemy couldn't tell who was shooting.
@zigzaghyena3 жыл бұрын
That sounds like a really great way to get shot by your friends on accident.
@T13-o7u3 жыл бұрын
@@zigzaghyena it was easier for us to know who was who.
@RetroFlame043 жыл бұрын
To this day, I still have my Great Grandpas Type 99 Arisaka and it's Type 30 Bayonet and Scabbard he took from the Phillipines. I also still have his Service Shotgun, his M10 Remington and it's cleaning kit.
@cameronbooker4453 жыл бұрын
The Japanese rifle is getting harder to find as true with all unmolested well cared for old battle rifles. Any idea how many Remingtons of that model u.s. property marked were manufactured? I only ask because ive seen and heard more stories of thompsons coming back and being passed down. I'd say the Remington is just as valuable and more scarce than any carbine, garand, 1911, 1903 Springfield just because shotguns though desirable then and now probably weren't hauled home with as much enthusiasm as other weapon types. Original "trench guns" hard to find. Thanks y'all
@RetroFlame043 жыл бұрын
@@cameronbooker445 My great-grandpa never did anything to the rifle to alter it and/or sporterize it. It's completely original, but it was partially damaged in his care, just a small piece of the stock damaged. The only damage that was intentional was that it's blossom was scratched by the previous owner. It's production number is 4219. As far as I can tell, it's an early war rifle, but my Great-Grandpa never brought back the dust cover. (I will also say that the Leather Scabbard is too late to repair, but the bayonet is almost perfect) The Shotgun is fine as well, but has small patches of rust. I've never looked into how many were properly marked. It's production number is 239345.
@AuRoaraAnimations3 жыл бұрын
Army- You cant use weapons that we didnt make (Vietnam war exists) soldiers- Rules shmooles, take no hostages!
@jboutdoors7083 жыл бұрын
Fun fact. The first snipers they outfitted in Vietnam were hastily put together and equipped by the military with different hunting rifles from Japanese sporting goods stores and pretty much whatever scope they could find. Hence who I believe it was the white feather who carried a Winchester model 70.
@liamconway10613 жыл бұрын
*grabs modified shotgun, flachette shells and bayonet*
@jamalwilburn2283 жыл бұрын
The problem with using enemy weapons is that it confuses your fellow allies in a firefight. If they hear AK-47s off in the distance, they are going to shoot in that direction or call in fire on that location. They aren't going to wait for verification if a freidnly unit is using enemy weapons.
@somefurryguy18113 жыл бұрын
ever heard about uniforms and coordination?, there's a difference between confusion and just being straight up dumb.(Also, IIRC most modern armies have rules of engagement, a.k.a don't fire unless directly in danger, or in case a friendly is directly in danger.)
@jamalwilburn2283 жыл бұрын
@@somefurryguy1811 You must be a textbook nerd who can't seperate between what happens in the field vs what the manual says. You shouldn't be using enemy weapons according to doctine and imagine a 18yo in a trench whose scarred out of his mind? He's going to shoot at what doesn't sound like enemy guns. Accidents happen and using enemy weapons only increases it.
@FuckTard-dd1ee3 жыл бұрын
@@jamalwilburn228 you sound like one too. Doubt u served
@TheGirard623 жыл бұрын
Tbh it's more complicated than that, it's true that intel on the battlefield can be limited and having as much as possible standardisation among your brother in arm can, especially their weapon, can help you better understand the battlefield, despite that, let's be honest, if you open fire on your buddies because of the sound of their weapon, then your squad lead or you fucked up since you are supposed to know at any time where is the rest of your unit
@Marinealver3 жыл бұрын
not a problem for a small commando team behind enemy lines. You know who is on your team, and that limits to everyone else being not on your team.
@-MonkeyPox3 жыл бұрын
When I was in a street gang, I was issued a Hi-Point 40 and a Century Arms AK with the serial number scratched off. I carried both through some epic battles such as the Battle of Kroger in Memphis and the 7-11 Insurection. The AK was taken as evidence but I still have the ahi Point. I wanted to have something that wouldn’t jam when held sideways out of a window of a Chevy Caprice.
@reeyuh5263 жыл бұрын
When my buddies dad was in Iraq, he said he liked using an AK from the Iraqi forces over the M16 he was issued for the reason that the 7.62 round was better at punching through the cinder block walls that were a common occurrence in all the urban fighting he did. Ironically my roommate carried a gold plated Desert Eagle during his tour that he bought while he was in Afghanistan
@kekula693 жыл бұрын
I would love to hear that desert eagle story
@EricToTheScionti3 жыл бұрын
@@kekula69 glownagger
@kekula693 жыл бұрын
@@EricToTheScionti nice try fbi
@yikes69692 жыл бұрын
wheres the irony
@chrisjanicki40313 жыл бұрын
I know a lot of polish families who still have Ww2 firearms such as mp-40s, ppshs hidden away away in cellars and attics for decades. When Germany withdrew, civilians/partisan were ordered by the communist regime to surrender our weapons. Alot of people didn't either because of disagreement or out of fear from previous lessons learned. Either way I remember when I was younger my grandfather was showing off an old rifle which was from what he said German. As far as my memory goes it must've been a Mauser 98-k. I've also heard a story from my father that some time in the 80' they were clearing the attic to make more room and they found 2 German grenades which my grandfather later dumped into a lake out of fear that the kids will get to them.
@LoneWolf-kw3ol3 жыл бұрын
could also be a Gewehr 33/40 or Gewehr 98, both were in heavy use by the german army before 1941 and remained in use for reserve and occupation units through the war when there werent enough Karabiners to go around
@PeacefulPeteable3 жыл бұрын
I don't think I could have pulled the caps, but I would have sent the grenades off in all their explosive glory. Wish I had grenades for a rainy day invasion...
@chrisjanicki40313 жыл бұрын
@@LoneWolf-kw3ol sorry I'm not well informed with the Mauser rifles. It must've been something standard issue anyway. I just called it 98k from gaming reference. It must've been a mouser metal button on the stock, thank blocky safety switch by the receiver and that slick looking muzzle. Definitely not a Mosin. I've held a Mosin and it was much longer and had that ball like bolt catch.
@chrisjanicki40313 жыл бұрын
@@PeacefulPeteable man I would've loved to see them go boom. Shame they were dumped into the lake but I would've felt quite uneasy knowing that I have grenades in the household xD
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
@@LoneWolf-kw3ol That's the usual role where wonky old weapons excel. You have a bunch of security units, because you want someone to sit and garrison a port or make sure the railroad isn't blown up or keep the spetsnaz or the partisans from just walking into town. All the new stuff is going to the frontline units, but you still need to arm these guys with something.
@jantodd123 жыл бұрын
When I served I remember my gunny saying that personal weapons where allowed, however they had to meet certain criteria.
@robmurphy8063 жыл бұрын
Do you recall the criteria?
@firestorm1653 жыл бұрын
@@robmurphy806 compatible with ammo and mags they were issuing for one I'd imagine
@kb49033 жыл бұрын
Love the Vietnam green smoke, gas mask, ‘cigarette’ scene. Very cool.
@badmandansanchez18233 жыл бұрын
My buddy scored a pair of gold Makarovs while stationed in Iraq from one of saddams palaces. He got popped trying to bring them back, he offered to let the inspector keep one but got both taken. Inspector probably brought both back. Soldiers should definitely be able to bring back a weapon that was used against them, it's not like one more gun in America is going to make us look gun crazy🤣
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
It's tales like this that makes IS blokes posing with US stuff feel reasonable. There is always a bunch of leftover stuff after a conflict, things that the actors didn't have time to remove or destroy. And stuff that is just a little busted, that can be made to working order with a bit of work.
@himmelpiratreanimeirt18133 жыл бұрын
Having served in the military and being a civilian gunsmith/collector, I can tell you i would much prefer and trust my personal weapons. My Glock 17 blows the M9 Berreta out of the water , my personal AR15 has three times the quality of the M4 .
@theozank8533 жыл бұрын
I had a SGT in the early 90's who still used a Government Issued M3 (Grease Gun) I loved that weapon.
@TheLegoblockstudios3 жыл бұрын
Why is the single action pistol firing in double action?
@cleanixx53433 жыл бұрын
Was about to comment exactly the same.. It’s even called the Single Action Army like come on
@coolmanyea50303 жыл бұрын
Because it’s an animation? Duh
@cleanixx53433 жыл бұрын
@@coolmanyea5030 They even have the animation of him shooting the revolver in single action during the next slide in Mexico…
@sayakest3 жыл бұрын
George S. Patton is just built different
@tonypeppermint53293 жыл бұрын
@@cleanixx5343 I'm guessing someone mucked up.
@hhale3 жыл бұрын
I know a fair number of veterans who used M1911 pistols long after the Army adopted the M9 Beretta as the standard side arm. It is true however that AK-47s and other non-US weapons were cheerfully policed up with no apologies before soldiers returned home from the Gulf War. That did not prevent one however from using them on the battlefield so long as the ammo held up. Really, though it's a logistics issue. Asking the military to keep your dad's custom .50 Desert Eagle pistol provisioned with parts and ammunition is not going to happen, and having loved ones ship it to you given current government and postal regulations isn't going to work. So what you've got is a hunk of metal of extreme sentimental value that can't be used that you're going to have to haul around with you everywhere you go. Not optimal.
@gravygraves51123 жыл бұрын
Guess that's what some guys in the comments meant about a personal arm having to meet certain standards. I can see something like a personal Beretta 92 or P226 being allowed since they already use standard ammo and the former wouldn't need special parts to be ordered but yeah, a deagle in .50AE would be a hard no go.
@DAN007thefoxx13 жыл бұрын
@@gravygraves5112 How about going full James Bond and using a Walther P99 as a personal sidearm? Don't know about parts but at least it accepts the same ammo as a 9mm Beretta.
@gravygraves51123 жыл бұрын
@@DAN007thefoxx1 lol shares no parts with the Beretta, neither dies the 226 tbh, but yeah, it's a full size semi auto pistol in 9x19mm
@killertruth1863 жыл бұрын
I think that they are going to change that after the Taliban gotten hold of the US military weapons and equipment.
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
Part of the process of NATO in Europe was to keep a few standards in armaments. You could be commanded by a different NATO nation or have your logistics run from a different NATO base than your own country.
@rkirschner71753 жыл бұрын
My late father was in Pacific theater, occupation of Japan. Brought home Nambu,2 7.7 Arisaka. One of which is custom from 50's. Williams peep,gold dot, custom stock,shortened, recrowned barrel. RIP DAD. 😢🙏
@juandemarko83483 жыл бұрын
I have my grandfather's 357 that he had since Korea, he always said he preferred the revolver over the 1911 acp
@xXxKAMIKAZExXx3 жыл бұрын
This is a topic I've always thought about, but never invested into. Great video as always!
@mikewade3863 жыл бұрын
Cool profile picture what is that based off of
@xXxKAMIKAZExXx3 жыл бұрын
@@mikewade386 it’s Feed Me’s logo, an electronic music producer.
@c-money96233 жыл бұрын
My great-grandfather brought back one of those old steamer trunk chest full of Japanese wallets, rifles, pistols and broken swords
@cnlbenmc3 жыл бұрын
I believe I've heard of a procedure in the US Army that allows for a soldier to carry a handgun that they themselves purchased under select circumstances that vaguely coresposnds to a similar one used by law enforcement. But it must be from an approved list of weapons and if it's anywhere near the fighting in basically needs to be near an exact duplicate of the standard issue service pistol so that it can draw on ammo and magazine stockpiles if needed. However the paperwork and approval process is arduous and armorers may be reluctant to work on damaged guns that don't belong to the military.
@cameronbooker4453 жыл бұрын
Sounds right. If deployed and operate in combat zone a rock or captured weapon or bought in country weapon or bare hands all covered in military DOJ or jag or whatever. Police the globe torch the village. Long member of the law!
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
@@cameronbooker445 I'd hate it if some grunt in Vietnam wanted me to work logistics for his favourite german machine pistols, but it's the bulgarian variant which uses a different screw. Only for them to use an automatic carbine anyways.
@Nexy93 жыл бұрын
0:18 “WHY DID YOU PUT THAT WEAPON TOGETHER SO QUICKLY, GUMP?” “You told me to, Drill Sergeant.”
@Banefulailment3 жыл бұрын
Guns from home were also carried because sometimes they were superior to the ones issued, service weapons are not chosen because they are the absolute best, they are chosen because they balance good quality with an affordable price or ease of manufacture
@coldsauce8823 жыл бұрын
" The Colt Single Action Army The Greatest Handgun Ever Made " Revolver Ocelot
@rickdiaz4273 жыл бұрын
Six bullets... More than enough to kill anything that moves. Now I'll show you why they call me... 'Revolver'.
@heckinmemes64303 жыл бұрын
@@rickdiaz427 "Because you use revolvers?"
@deadpooldubs7313 жыл бұрын
Liquidddddddddd!
@christopherdempsey38783 жыл бұрын
Snake: "I see you got yourself a single action army." Ocelot: "That's right. There will be no accidents this time."
@danielnavarro5373 жыл бұрын
Good video. Keep up the good work. 👍
@stlukas33ja163 жыл бұрын
Luv your contents keep going lad
@Shintareth3 жыл бұрын
I knew a Vietnam vet who always talked about keeping a sawed off double barrel 12 Gauge for when, "The enemy was close enough to smell."
@javelina2093 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your service to those who all served and sacrificed. I am truly thankful.
@lasombra14693 жыл бұрын
"This is the greatest handgun ever made: 1:13 "Six bullets, more than enough to kill anything that moves"
@manoftheocean69883 жыл бұрын
"Engravings...Give you no tactical advantage whatsoever."
@ThatRandomGuy303 жыл бұрын
I love collecting guns that veterans brought back from wars.
@cruzaider53393 жыл бұрын
Nice me too fam but sometimes their locks and security cameras are a pain in the back
@kreimer17023 жыл бұрын
@@cruzaider5339 hol up
@meloncollies3 жыл бұрын
@@cruzaider5339 yeah man that guy called “museum” has a lot of em
@cruzaider53393 жыл бұрын
@@meloncollies it's too hard to get one's that shoot so I often find veterans that are labeled as 'war heroes' cus they have an entire armoury
@lasombra14693 жыл бұрын
Do you happen to have a katana taken from an Japanese officer?
@massman36983 жыл бұрын
My Uncle was a Force Recon Marine in Vietnam. He told me once that whenever they killed or captured VC they would take their AKs and whatever ammo they could find and use those instead of the M-16. Because it sucked
@torg21263 жыл бұрын
A1 models? Certainly. If you use the proper ammunition for it and clean it regularly, it's reliable, as the Brownell's reproduction proves. Later models are more reliable that the AKM's of the time
@gaylebordeaux76323 жыл бұрын
@@torg2126 I can see you’ve never seen combat…….the toys are never cleaned
@fallout06243 жыл бұрын
@@gaylebordeaux7632 if you don't maintain your weapon it's your own damn fault when it fails.
@JohanCody3 жыл бұрын
@@fallout0624 lol. The A-1's didn't have lined barrels, they'd rust before a patrol was even over.
@gaylebordeaux76323 жыл бұрын
@@fallout0624 well I made it through one war with dirty weapon, when there is no provision by the US Army, the only way to clean your weapon is rotor wash and dirt. Truly speaking you don’t oil on your weapon, it will pick up more dirt in ten seconds than you can believe.
@dio57313 жыл бұрын
My pops served in the army and was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. They were told specifically not to take “trophies” due to the fact those guns a lot of the time were older and had more of a tendency to jam and misfire. He said if you are going to war for souvenirs, then you didn’t need to be there.
@Christian_H3rnand3z2 жыл бұрын
1:12 A fine piece of craftsmanship
@mondaymotivator_3 жыл бұрын
I wish the military let you use your own gun if it still is compatible with standardization
@thekraken11733 жыл бұрын
Call of Duty without respawn
@Sure_You_Betcha3 жыл бұрын
I can understand the rule as it pertains to standard issue rifles due to logistics and what not. But non-issued sidearms (pistols/revolvers) should be allowed, however the military should not be expected to send ammo for that sidearm.
@kurousagi81553 жыл бұрын
@@Sure_You_Betcha exactly. If personnel aren’t being issued items, they should be allowed to bring or use things from home as long as the item doesn’t compromise the effectiveness of standard issue.
@fifthcolumn3883 жыл бұрын
@@Sure_You_Betcha I think he means that if your rifle takes the same cartridges as can be found in normal supply lines, it should be allowed. Could have saved lives if soldiers were allowed to use AR-10’s and PTR-91’s in Afghanistan where they needed the heavier 7.62x51 cartridges in their personal weapons for the longer ranges. They could have stripped rounds from MG belts.
@lukebaldwin36823 жыл бұрын
SOCOM guys use their own uppers on M4s since they have the freedom. But they also have unit armorers which can custom build rifles for different applications. Since they have more money than standard infantry.
@MizantropMan3 жыл бұрын
When there inevitably occurs a war with moon or martian colonies, I wonder how many captured guns are going to end on both sides, planets aways from where they were made. I always liked the idea of captured weapons. In it's home army, a rifle is but one of many, but once captured and repurposed, it becomes unique.
@DAN007thefoxx13 жыл бұрын
I like using the Covenant's own weapons against them in Halo. Pop an elite's shields with a Plasma Pistol and then finishing them off with a 50cal round from the Magnum. Or maybe blowing up a Wraith with a Fuel Rod Cannon. Or sticking a grunt with a Plasma 'nade.
@kikkerslikker45333 жыл бұрын
"inevitably" lmfao
@Nergal_Slayer3 жыл бұрын
What an intriguing thought
@somefurryguy18113 жыл бұрын
@@kikkerslikker4533 I mean, war is human nature, resources would be planet-specific(like certain planets would have more copper or iron, you get the point.), it would be a shitshow thankfully i won't be alive to see it.
@MrTJPAS3 жыл бұрын
There was a show on Sci Fi called Defiance, which took place decades after a war where alien refugees had tried to invade Earth and the survivors on both sides live among the ruins trying to coexist, and because the world is pretty run down from the war, aliens will carry AKs and other old human weapons and have no problem using them, because a gun is a gun whether its human or alien. I thought it was pretty cool for worldbuilding in that show.
@82dorrin3 жыл бұрын
You use captured weapons in situations where you're cut off from resupply and run out of ammo for your issued weapons. Paratroopers often had to use captured German weapons during WWII.
@dominuslimo41473 жыл бұрын
True, in fact some paratroopers probably lost their equipment during the jump so they would have to use captured weapons
@akreebs933 жыл бұрын
There is an old ww2 training video on KZbin that is about using German weapons so it true that US soldiers would use captured weapons.
@tomwelshshore3 жыл бұрын
There are archives interviews i watched where a man talked about raiding a castle in Belgium to find a room full of rockets so the fired them all at the next thing that presented its self. One of his buddies got crushed under the doorway of a castle hit by fire as they came out. I wish they would upload them all to youtube but they wont.
@889977993 жыл бұрын
Yea the german didn’t need the gun or ammo anymore if they killed them. Thats my End of world plan. No need to stockpile supplies. The people without weapons (the ones we told to buy a gun) will have all the supplies you’ll need.
@somethingedgy21853 жыл бұрын
@@akreebs93 Link? I would love a link to that old training film
@beedubree25503 жыл бұрын
my great-grandfather managed to bring home a Ghurka kukri knife from WW2. pretty unique weapon to bring home.
@wage45983 жыл бұрын
If a revolver is single action you have to pull back the hammer for every shot as opposed to double action which alows you to just pull the trigger and pull back the hammer in one motion
@erics68223 жыл бұрын
In the early years of Afghanistan troops would ask their family to send them rifle scopes because technically it was not a weapon. After a while they banned that too because troops were getting way more headshots than usual and leadership told them they needed to stop because it was some Geneva convention violation.
@Jynx19273 жыл бұрын
Huh Intresting to know
@seamusnolan9053 жыл бұрын
The same thing happened when the US started issuing the ACOG. They thought that soldiers were executing enemy combatants because so many were being shot in the head, but it was just because the soldiers could actually hit what they were aiming at
@Marc_W_McKinley3 жыл бұрын
well that's just stupid. if they let them keep the scopes they could've won the war in Afghanistan.
@ninjagamingxplayz65853 жыл бұрын
But didn't they want to win the war?
@danielevans89103 жыл бұрын
@@seamusnolan905 that’s actually crazy lmao.
@maxout2142263 жыл бұрын
They should ease these rules up. Soldiers who can capture weapons should to some degree be able to keep said weapons. Soldiers who wish to bring a weapon to the field, provided it meets a service standard should be able to be brought.
@eva26023 жыл бұрын
The standard issue weapon is the standard issue for a reason. As soon as you have something new, unpredictable, perhaps worse, you not only risk your own life but you also compromise your ability to back up your unit.
@DNS-Freakz3 жыл бұрын
The problem is if you have an m4 and grab an AK with enough ammo and mags at some point they will be empty or you will have to go into battle with 60 bullets because you don't have any spare and no one can give you ammo in the thick of a battle because you have different caliber and magazines.
@wolfgang_h3t3 жыл бұрын
@@DNS-Freakz You missed the 'providing it meets service standards' part, which more than likely requires a standardised cartridge
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
@@wolfgang_h3t That or any other kind of maintenance. Just keeping all the variants of NATO firearms maintained was a hassle, without tossing in Pact weapons as well. Veterans talking about these weapons describe them as throwaway. Once your stolen bulgarian SMG breaks it's easier to toss it and use your standard firearm.
@commisaryarreck39742 жыл бұрын
Eh, worst case demilitarize it and allow them to take it home. Allow trophies
@ekparatrooperfilms96683 жыл бұрын
Teacher no toys from home. Will be taken away if caught: Boys:
@LegendaryMercDC3 жыл бұрын
My great grandad served in the navy in the Pacific during WW2. He didn't drink or smoke but he knew the value of alcohol & cigarettes so he saved his rations of it. Later in occupied Japan he traded two bottles of whiskey to a Marine for a Japanese type 38 araisaka with the bayonet. Inherited it from him after he passed away. Several years ago. Even though I had a gunsmith inspect it and he cleared it I'm weary of shooting it as it hasn't been fired in decades. Still looks great though.
@landonsss81143 жыл бұрын
Guns can still be shot after even longer than that I’m sure you are good. Use a string for the first couple rounds
@itisroan3 жыл бұрын
1:15 “single action revolver” it then shoots in double action
@danielavery49783 жыл бұрын
A few observations: You have to be careful when disposing of personal weapons when leaving theater--don't even think about trying to smuggle them back. Often, TCNs (Third Country Nationals) are responsible for trash, and weapons and ordnance disposed of in the trash can wind up among the TCNs. If memory serves, a search found an AK47 and smoke grenades among a TCN in Iraq on a secured base; odds are favorable that it was recovered from trash. If in theater and desirous of extra munitions (such as grenades!), check amnesty boxes (if not secured), PMO (who tends to service the amnesty boxes), Special Forces (a kind word goes a long way), outgoing units, and customs (primarily for medical goods, not munitions). I imagine that it would be easier to smuggle a weapon sear back from a combat zone than a whole weapon or receiver...but subject to UCMJ and federal penalties. You'd be better off buying a binary trigger lawfully. It is far easier to (unlawfully) bring a weapon to a combat zone than to bring one back. For myself, I'm not interested in personal firearms in combat zone--but seeing as I'm issued a rifle and pistol anyway, I don't really need them. Weapons are meant to be felt, not seen; don't carry blades openly on your gear and use retention type holsters for pistols. Truth is, when it comes to blades, you are unlikely to use them as weapons--they fall below long arm, pistol, and muzzle strikes as weapons. Medical shears are generally more useful, tucked behind other gear. YMMV.
@redtra2363 жыл бұрын
Well the sears are typically not even a regulated part is the receiver so that would be stupid to try
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
Most veterans I've heard describe knives as tools first. You can open MRE bags with them, cut lines of cord, make a hole in tarp etc. They're tremendously useful for lots of things other than knifing a guy.
@RBG-tr9ce3 жыл бұрын
I know two police officers who were activated during Desert Storm. They packed their personal sidearms and took them with them. It made them feel a little better.
@cirinosaldana42893 жыл бұрын
Please do some history about MACV-SOG, I always wanted to hear about them.
@DavidGarcia-em6hk3 жыл бұрын
In 2003 many of us had personal sidearms. We brought them on ship with our commands knowledge but once we were in country we were denied access. I'm sure there was a real reason but our command stated ammo availability. Once we return to Pendleton we got our sidearms back. So although I didn't get to carry my personal beretta brigadier I still know that it was in country and is what I will give my son when he gets his commission.
@alecbowman41273 жыл бұрын
I have a Japanese Type 99 rifle; brought back to the states by my great uncle.
@Da_man-lb7wn3 жыл бұрын
If you look closely at the note from 0:48, the writing on it matches up with the lines from that point onward. Pretty fun easter egg if I do say so myself.
@polytoric3 жыл бұрын
I love how they depicted the Vietnam era soldiers/marines. It was accurate to the time frame!
@vegan-cannibal7143 жыл бұрын
Okay when I deployed for ODS/ODS I took my Colt 1911a1 my reasoning was it was a much more reliable and accurate weapon. Yes I did pick up an AKMS, but that was simply just in case access to ammo became an issue. I never had to use the AK and at the end of the war I turned it in as a captured weapon. When I first joined the army the NCOs that I worked for had served in Vietnam. Since my job centered on recon the older leader told us how common it was to be with out resupply. So we learned to pick-up enemy weapons to use if we ran out of our own ammo. When possible we trained with Soviet weapons. Basically solders will use enemy weapons when ammo is unavailable or if their weapons are a better fit for the mission you are doing. If you happen to be clearing buildings a shorter weapon just works better. So if you happen to have an AK with a folding stock that is going to be a better answer for that task than your M16 with a 20inch barrel.
@josefanon85042 жыл бұрын
I wonder how common it was to find one with a folding stock
@vegan-cannibal7142 жыл бұрын
@@josefanon8504 the unit we delt with on day one was a republican guard armor division that I couldn't spell the name of if I had to. Anyways almost everyone one of them carried the folding stock. I don't know if that was because they were an armor unit or if it was because they were republican guard. Tawakalna I had to Google it or I'd have been up all night trying to remember it.
@josefanon85042 жыл бұрын
@@vegan-cannibal714 Damn, encountering such a group on day one. Though I guess it came in handy to have those right away.
@The_Conspiracy_Analyst3 жыл бұрын
My father purchased a Ruger Blackhawk .357 at the PX in Udorn Thailand in 1963 since the Navy refused to issue him a weapon (he was a flight surgeon).
@caeserromero30133 жыл бұрын
In the British army up till the end of WW1 British officers had to provide their own side arm as long as it was chambered for the standard issue cartridge. Hence they had all different kinds, webleys, Adams, Mauser, Colt etc.