I spend a lot of time looking at, and talking about firing sequence as opposed to firing order. In my opinion, what you are seeing is a combination of cylinder robbing during the induction stroke, and differences in cylinder scavenging during the exhaust stroke. Because of this, when I port intake manifolds, I bias the porting based on firing sequence, and if I'm making an exhaust, I never use equal length primary pipes, because I'm trying to equalise the pulse in the collector, not having 2 pulses arrive on top of each other, then a big gap. Good stuff Richard. Really looking forward to the next instalment
@mattg9958 Жыл бұрын
Love seeing the a/f ratio differences of individual cylinders vs dp/sp intakes. Great stuff, i cant wait to see blow thru setup next. Could you do duel 4 barrel carbs also? Great channel.
@stickman-1 Жыл бұрын
That's why I have EGTs on every cylinder. Also you can tune the carb jetting in the lean holes a little bit. At least to get to the safe zone. Also you can port the intake in ways to better equalize the flow to a particular cylinder. I've been there and done that (just using spark plug readings 30 years ago.)
@AB-80X Жыл бұрын
There will never be a substitute for spark plug reading.
@jmans093 Жыл бұрын
That's downright scary. I wonder if it would be better on the old small block firing order vs the LS one. LS pattern is regarded as a little better for power and smoothness, but maybe there's a reason the engineers chose the old pattern back in the day when fueling was a bit less precise. If the LS pattern is indeed a little worse in this regard, that might explain why GM monitors it so closely. A lot of people don't know this, but most, maybe all, GM LS/new LT engines monitor individual cylinder air fuel ratios, even with just one O2 sensor per bank. The sensor and ECM is sensitive enough to detect A/F variations between cylinder pulses and too much variation will set DTCs P219A (Fuel Trim Cylinder Balance Bank 1) or P219B (Fuel Trim Cylinder Balance Bank 2). With just one sensor per bank, the ECM doesn't know which cylinder is causing the variation, but it still knows if one of them is off beyond a certain threshold and will set a check engine lamp with one of these codes depending on the bank it detects the problem on. And it doesn't take much. Seen a lot of this code on seemingly perfectly running engines. I've personally never seen another engine family where the OE does this.
@TomSmith-cv8hk Жыл бұрын
Same problem different cylinders.
@bryanmaloney6651 Жыл бұрын
At a pro stock team I woked at in the late 90's, we had to stagger the jetting by eight numbers to get the O2's evened out on the dyno. This was with symmetrical port DRCE 2 heads. The GM engineer said this was typical from what he had seen at other teams. He also said he had finished a week of testing at a pro stock truck team running 18 degree chevy heads (siamese runners); and they ended up staggering jetting seventeen (!) numbers to even out O2 readings.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
WE HAVE DONE BIG STAGGER ON BBC TUNNEL RAMS AS WELL-EVEN PUT A TOOTHPICK IN THE AIR BLEED
@josephtravers777 Жыл бұрын
One of your best videos, Richard. I tune for the leanest cylinders to be on the safe side. The A/F comparison between intakes is great info. Thanks man! 👍
@tonybernheim8365 Жыл бұрын
Cool video..I have always used a open single plane type plastic carburator 2 inch spacer on both single/ Dual plane intake manifolds..Helps with vapor lock/ Fuel temp with a 800cfm Q-jet......
@brracing7861 Жыл бұрын
Before I left for NNN 2023 I installed new Accel C-cut spark plugs in the 1997 C2500 454 Gen6 engine. Used Accels had 15k miles on them nice even Burn patterns on porcelain tips. Was impressed no Porting any by me pure bone stock.
@baby-sharkgto4902 Жыл бұрын
I really like these type of tests 👍
@ricksshop Жыл бұрын
Thank you for covering this. I assume the pulls were WOT, imagine the fuel distribution at part throttle with angled throttle blades in the airstream. This is the reason I usually advise people to skip right over throttle body injection and go straight to port injection.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
port injection is still a distribution problem with these intakes, unless you do individual cylinder trim
@Prestiged_peck Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727I wonder how much better it would be with a dedicated port injection intake with flow matched injectors
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
port efi with individual cylinder tuning will make it spot on at every rpm
@ricksshop Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 Seems like every time I pull a carb intake off an engine and install a factory EFI manifold, most fuel distribution problems go away. Haven't added fuel rails and a TB to an aftermarket intake, which I assume is what you are talking about...
@anthonyrowland90725 ай бұрын
A properly ported manifold can be key to a build. A lot of guys get an imported intake for cheap and optimize it for the price of a domestic as cast manifold.
@ericschumacher5189 Жыл бұрын
The blow through that could make in better or worse based on design. The shape of blow through hats vary pretty significantly between different manufacturers, and it would be hard to know what a “good” shape would be to improve the issue without testing multiple.
@wydopnthrtl Жыл бұрын
1 & 7 are the front and rear on drivers side. Just goes to show that modern day FI w/an injector at each cylinder is more efficient and IMO wiser to use.
@mattmorrison6958 Жыл бұрын
Really good stuff! Diving back into your channel and really digging the content lately
@brracing7861 Жыл бұрын
Be interesting to test on a 454 Gen 4, Gen 5 454 and Gen6 454. Big Block Chevy has 2 good intake ports and 2 bad intake ports per cylinder head in Racing Porting world. Mine runs hard and butter smooth at idle.
@AndyB718 Жыл бұрын
Ls7 motor i had done saw a 22hp and almost the same tq increase going from a edelbrock super vic to a CID. BR7 liked the CID
@Dannymclovin Жыл бұрын
ebay sellers have started importing these 2 manifolds without branding for 175-200 bucks on both i currently have a the dual plain on a blowthrough 5.3 and has run fine but for hood space alone i wanted to get the single since its almost 2 inches shorter than the dual
@bethanyhaskiell9116 Жыл бұрын
Wow usually the dual plane is shorter I've never seen a dual plane that was taller than the single plane counter part
@Dannymclovin Жыл бұрын
@@bethanyhaskiell9116 I’m only going off part numbers but on eBay they sell both (I run an eBay 300 130 dual plain) but I’ve gone to a summit store and they have both of those next to each other and the single plain does look shorter
@skippy2987 Жыл бұрын
It's also worth noting that it might not be just an intake problem. Or at least I've seen evidence that the cylinder to cylinder torque production varies by a LOT driven by the exhaust design. Mostly because of blowdown interference.
@TK-eg7eg Жыл бұрын
Boost will help distribution.
@michaelmaher4328 Жыл бұрын
I love your information, thank you. How do you keep your engine [your body] running healthy? diet and exercise?
@jmflournoy386 Жыл бұрын
we used to read plugs and individual egt wish we had had 02 we used popsicle sticks xrams were tough
@darylmorse Жыл бұрын
Richard, this is really interesting. I really appreciate your insightful video, yet again. This kind of begs the question, why would anyone use a carburetor when you can fix this problem using FI?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
the intake design is also the problem, a trait shared with efi intakes
@ninjahawg94 Жыл бұрын
I think with certain engine platforms and coresponding cylinder head designs afr balancing within each individual cylinder can be acheivable with a dual quad intake or ITB's. No real difference than port injection other than better control over precise fuel metering at all rpm ranges due to electonic control. Sure there will be some minor differences due to differences in individual cylinders like ring sealing, valve sealing, dynamic compression differences, cam grind tolerances, etc., but once each cylinder has its own dedicated throttle to control and refine or tune the end result should be balanced between them. Just my 2 cents worth.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
a dual quad what? Tunnel Ram? dual plane? all of these still have dramatic changes in distribution. Stack injection (assuming the same runner shape and legth) can be closer than typical carb intakes. The ring sealing etc... mentioned would be a tiny fraction compared to the difference in distribution caused by the intake and attending fuel demand.
@brracing7861 Жыл бұрын
I think the issue can ony be solved by cylinder head and intake Porting Richard Holdener. Not so much after hige CSA for 100+ Hp gains but to even out Cylinder Airflow and wetflow. Complex topic Indeed.
@jdcarguy1242 Жыл бұрын
I'd like to see how much better something like a Parker funnelweb intake would do with distribution.
@Jim_Lawrence Жыл бұрын
So recommendation is read the plugs along with the O2 sensors?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
If you have 8 sensors, no need to read plugs
@Jim_Lawrence Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 This is true. I meant for the "Normal" guy that has just one sensor in each header. If the O2 reads fine, maybe you detect rich and lean cylinders with a plug check. Not everyone is as cool as you with all those toys you use 😂
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
lots of guys do that-especially nitrous guys. The other option is to put sensor bungs in each primary port and make pulls reading just 1 cylinder-then compare.
@WACKOJACKO6648 Жыл бұрын
Obviously, stacks!
@danielsosa35625 ай бұрын
A really great subject. Now question is what are things that can be prevented from leaning our engine and destroying it from this. I had this issue happen on a 496. I had a gap with an 850 double pumper in a few cylinders ended up leaning out. I had to rebuild the motor again, so what are some steps that can be taken before this before the dyno tuning
@richardholdener17275 ай бұрын
you usually need to add fuel to all the cylinders with a carb to care for the 1 lean cylinder (making the others richer). You can sometimes do a corner jet to work on 2 cylinder (this is even more effective on a 2 carb tunnel ram)
@Damothedevo Жыл бұрын
I noticed that it was 7 and 1 both times, was wondering if that was a result of firering order and whether stagered jetting could alleviate some of the leanness without richenung the entire enigine too much. Great vid, very interesting.
@blainesnider9089 Жыл бұрын
Mercruiser staggered jets may be 2 to 4 different jets, and in the carter's they used air directors and staggered jets
@sparwars Жыл бұрын
Two things. First..try a Ford product firing order difference. Second, is there a preventative AFR number to get some added safety? Jump the secondary jets a few? Us street guys need to know if our afr targets are hurting us.
@sparwars Жыл бұрын
Do you suppose a 1971 cleveland 4v iron intake was analyzed back then for even distribution? Do I trust the old engineers vs an aluminum aftermarket installation?
@jesusyeshuaelelyonelshadai6295 Жыл бұрын
Is it possible to run 2 separate ecus on a 8 cylinder fuel injection motor with 4 02 sensors to monitor and regulate the efi system for maximum efficiency??? 🤔🤔 of course some wires will be spliced together inputs .. outputs would vary also.. could it be not a fuel issue but a air tunnel issue... I think by changing port size or inserting a restricted adapter in the lean cylinders might get less air and maybe more gas... to make that cylinder run same as rest..
@TK-eg7eg Жыл бұрын
You would just add fuel to the lean cylinder if you have EFI. Fueltec and Haltec can run 8 o2 sensors.
@joejohnson4868 Жыл бұрын
Do you think the lean cylinders is a product of the intake design and/or firing order. I would to see the same test on a port layout like a SBC and see the individual AFRs cylinder to cylinder.
@dannytravis7118 Жыл бұрын
Makes me curious about a tunnel ram intake.
@petethomas96235 ай бұрын
Like to see this test with nailhead/holden firing order
@ztwntyn8 Жыл бұрын
I tried a single plane holy street dominator on my 400 Pontiac. It lost lots of torque below about 3000-3500rpm it sucked for the street. With gears more cam and higher stall speed I’m sure it would work ok but I had none of those things
@Carl_Jr Жыл бұрын
Yes. That matters. I went from a dual plane Weiand to a Victor Jr on my 350 and love it! But I also have a 3,000 stall converter in my 71 Camaro. Without it I doubt I would be as happy
@richdouche8253 Жыл бұрын
Always wondered why when the auto world made the transition to EFI, there weren't o2 sensors for each individual cylinder, as there were injectors placed for each individual cylinder?? Seems if your goal is optimization, that would have been the logical step, right.
@m.pietro9087 Жыл бұрын
Richard, I’d love if you could test the Edelbrock Pro Flo 4, specially in the Ford 302. Thank you.
@phillipkeep7037 Жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to test the dual plane with an open spacer for comparison
@danmyers9372 Жыл бұрын
It tends to slightly help the distribution but not enough to overcome the inherent design issues.
@dennisrobinson8008 Жыл бұрын
tunnel ram for the win.
@sevencorter Жыл бұрын
I wonder if this has to do with each cylinder having a different flow rate/flow characteristics based on the head design and header flow concentration and o2 sensor location. Just a few thoughts.
@Prestiged_peck Жыл бұрын
Definitely a big part of the problem here
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
Head design and header flow concentration and sensor location? All that and not the thing that was actually tested? How about no.
@sevencorter Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727obviously the intake has a lot to do with it, but how much do each of the cylinders pull from the intake. I imagine it to be like a litter of 8 puppies trying to get milk from 4 tits. Some of the puppies are going to have a stronger suction and therefore get more than the weaker ones. Each primary tube has its own flow characteristics and the concentration may miss some sensors while fully blasting others. Picture it like those o2 sensor spacers to make them read less. There are plenty more factors that could affect the results of what a sensor is reading and displaying.
@earth9531 Жыл бұрын
Lean Mixtures do NOT kill cylinders or motors. Cylinder TEMPERATURE does.
@Cammy_The_Camaro Жыл бұрын
LOVE IT! I remember asking this question! Thank you! You are THE man! One more question, what about an throttle body efi unit? Do you think it would aid in distribution?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
doubtful-this is primarily an intake issue
@bigrich7026 Жыл бұрын
Which cylinders were going lean? Wet flow will be worse.
@falfighter Жыл бұрын
nice test. thank you
@KompressorPete Жыл бұрын
Great test- Thanks! Could a simpler/cheaper messurement be made with a (cheap laser) temp measurement on the individual exh manifold pipes? Is cyl 1 & 7 often the most starving cylinders?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
no-EGT is not AF
@joemadoo Жыл бұрын
Can you please do a collaboration with Project Farm. That is all! Love your content!
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
they do good stuff
@torquetwisted4294 Жыл бұрын
Richard... If you happen to see this... Could you please tell me which colors on the single plane intake graft, go to what cylinders ? It would help me in my research greatly... Thanks
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
what are you researching
@johnb7430 Жыл бұрын
How does adding spacers under the carb affect distribution? I've always heard open spacer for dual plane helps distribution... but does it?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
this had a 1/2 spacer under the carb with boost (it had the fittings for the boost and BOV).
@johnhaskell6251 Жыл бұрын
I've wondered about larger cross section for lean ports. I've looked at Buick 455 factory manifolds noticing those manifolds are huge in cross section. Never seen a dual plane manifold that large. Just thinking.
@bill2178 Жыл бұрын
even with efi it can still be 1-2 point variation but i expected carbs to be more consistent than efi
@Clobercow1 Жыл бұрын
Engine Masters did multiple tests of EFI and Carb with individual cylinder AFR readings and carbs don't fuel as evenly I thought either. For that matter, neither does batch mode injection. If your really want to dial it in, sequential injection is require, though probably not necessary for a good running engine depending on how close to the edge you're pushing it.
@brandonrohrer7914 Жыл бұрын
Now do it with a hi ram ! 😊 !
@keithscudder7136 Жыл бұрын
Love these tests ! Question, if you are running headers that don't have any O2 sensors in them, could you use a thermal gun to find the cooler/hotter cylinders ? Thanks in advance.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
temp isn't just AF-it is timing
@keithscudder7136 Жыл бұрын
Let me guess, too little timing=more heat, extra timing = somewhat cooler. Thanks for your answer.
@2QuickNovas Жыл бұрын
Has anyone added injector bungs to a dual plane LS intake in order to make a broader torque curve? No one seems to sell that configuration.
@JohnStright5 ай бұрын
@richardholdener why do companies not make a dual plane efi intake for the ls motors?
@richardholdener17275 ай бұрын
they should if they don't
@JohnStright5 ай бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 right! No Holley. Edelbrock. They have bosses in place... But that's it. Speedmaster makes a square port version but... Given their track record of ripping people off I'd rather not buy from them.... I find it strange for sure.
@RobsNeighbor Жыл бұрын
Hello Everyone!
@Jim_Lawrence Жыл бұрын
Ello Guvna
@adamdubeau8038 Жыл бұрын
How would these results go if you tried the Aces Throttle Body injection to compensate for the AFR adjustments?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
you can help the average af but not cylinder to cylinder
@sktt1209 Жыл бұрын
Would be really interesting to try to jet each 4bbl hole to fix it. Would jetting a corner up help?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
it would change more than 1 hole
@sktt1209 Жыл бұрын
Right just wondering if you could bandaid it at all.
@austincjett Жыл бұрын
How about a real world AFR measurement at part throttle between 1,600 to 2,500 rpm. Were an engine spends the majority of it's time.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
how about your factory EFI constantly monitoring and altering the AF under those cruise conditions because of closed loop. You are good at part throttle
@russelljackson7034 Жыл бұрын
Right on
@chevyrc3623 Жыл бұрын
So what's making cylinder number 1 run much leaner than the rest
@petepeto9335 Жыл бұрын
Richard.. can i ask what car/truck u have... And ofcource engine? Supercharger? Cam?.. Nice vids... Just never stop making 💪 Greetings from Finland
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
202 Silverado (all stock 5.3l)
@Go4BrokeOffroad Жыл бұрын
Sefi for the win.
@johnlewis8156 Жыл бұрын
Do sbc intake manifolds have the same issue? I am putting an old LT1 in my wife's 240z with a T56 but planned on shooting a little N2O for when she has a bad day. But I guess I will keep away from the bottle so that it doesn't do that.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
small shots are fine
@johnlewis8156 Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 it's amazing how many motors are out there right now with this happening and they still survive.
@kevinvannoy Жыл бұрын
i need to bring your blow thru carb back.. 😉
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
Yes
@kevinvannoy Жыл бұрын
it’s there.. 👍🏻
@ryandoyle4344 Жыл бұрын
Is it due to a runner with additional airflow, less fuel, or both?
@johnnijssen8590 Жыл бұрын
I just watched your AFR video. Those lean cylinders would keep me awake at night. I wonder if a TBI would fare better than a carb? As I understand it, a TBI tries to throw the same amount of fuel in every cylinder, but vacuum pulling on the venturi of a carb will be a little different for each induction stroke. I put a TBI of a SP manifold on a Pontiac because other test I read about suggest TBI prefer SP manifold over DP. However, I call BS, all I need do is look at your manifold test and focus on Tq under 5000RPM. Still, all said and done, how do we fatten up that one cylinder? I'd try fooling around with a turtle, but with low optimism.
That reminds me. I had a 540BBC making 700Tq on the dyno and looking at the AFR on each side I saw a difference, so I tried corner jetting. It did help even the AFRs, but the power output remained the same. Then some other engine builder told me he noted a loss of power when he tried to even things out, so I just forgot about trying to do that. I once checked each cylinder's AFR on a stack EFI system I built. I use one O2 sensor and measure each cylinder one at a time.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
Watch the EFI video where I did individual cylinder tuning-it changed power very little-but did make it safe
@m8_fanatic Жыл бұрын
Hey mate, looking for advice on a cam for a 350 sbc. It has standard flat tappet heads, new 4 barrel 600 holley on an edelbrock street performer. And new hei dissy. Also block hugger headers and 2.5 exhaust. Im after a cam that doesnt compromise torque and has a nice idle to it, any suggestions? Its a 66 impala. I want to make more power but not lose drivability down low
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
look at XE256 or 262 from Comp cams
@DWBmotorsports Жыл бұрын
Part 2 out yet?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
yes
@jimjohnson3357 Жыл бұрын
Would stager jetting have an effect on the AFR for each cylinder? Also for those of us who don't have the ability to check each cylinder for AFR can we tune using exhaust gas or header temperature in conjunction with AFR?
@bill2178 Жыл бұрын
egt is good for timing but not for afr
@AlanRoehrich9651 Жыл бұрын
Stagger jetting works. While EGT is not ideal, it is useful, if used correctly and understood.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
stagger jetting works best on tunnel rams (8 jets and 8 cylinders, but it can help on single planes
@TomSmith-cv8hk Жыл бұрын
Where's the other two cylinders traces ? and if you number them we may see what causes the dual plane unevenness.
@markh8301 Жыл бұрын
So at what number is AFR considered lean? Guess it's a lot less than stoich
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
above 13.0:1 is lean at WOT (or even a number below that that causes detonation)
@dfields80 Жыл бұрын
Dual carbs
@jeffreylynch3203 Жыл бұрын
4-7 switch?
@alexbrown4820 Жыл бұрын
With a solid cam, is it possible to adjust this with valve lash? Or am I way off?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
it won't change the intake issues, but would be interesting to see how it changed AF
@alexbrown4820 Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 I learned something I thought was odd recently. I did a compression test on my friends mud truck. It's about a 14 to 1, 602ci chevy with a good size cam. No 2 cylinder had a lot more pressure. Reset all the valves and that cylinder had a lot of slop. Reset everything and all was back to the same. That's the reason I was curious
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
If you increase lash, you effectively reduce the cam timing (make it milder), this increases cylinder pressure
@alexbrown4820 Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 that's very interesting. Intake exhaust overlap?
@NBC_NCO Жыл бұрын
Do equal length runners help?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
they can help to equalize flow and charge filling to the cylinder
@jeffreylynch3203 Жыл бұрын
When you say fuel injection make sure you make it clear you mean port fuel, not throttle body. Throttle body is a total waste of time, money, and effort. Still has a wet intake, for one thing.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
TB injection can be tuned to provide a better average AF than the carb, that is one benefit, but can't do individual cylinder, but it often makes more power than port EFI (like a carb) from the charge cooling.
@daledavies2334 Жыл бұрын
What was the AFR on cylinders 4 and 6 with the single plane manifold?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
6 was 10.5-11.4 and 4 was 10.5-11.7 variations at different rpm
@daledavies2334 Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727Thank you Richard for the quick response. So richening up the jets on that side of the carburetor is not exactly feasible. Needs some work probably in the manifold plenum to equalize the fuel distribution. Throttle body injection would not cure the problem. Only port injection could effectively deal with it, but the airflow discrepancies could have it off a bit.
@keithswiercz3890 Жыл бұрын
Would port injection help with this issue?
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
with individual cylinder trimming it would
@1clnsdime1 Жыл бұрын
That's why u have to read the plugs.
@scottm7341 Жыл бұрын
120° LSA? Why? That will prevent the headers from doing anything useful. Heck it shouldn't even exist.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
headers still function with 120 lsa
@davidphillips3953 Жыл бұрын
Look behind you! There a funny looking bald guy sneaking up back there around 9 minutes in
@HioSSilver1999 Жыл бұрын
That thing needed to rev higher
@malamri424 Жыл бұрын
wow this is unexpected! another argument for going with a rich AFR.
@JC-gw3yo Жыл бұрын
good grief... Looks like going to EFI is the smart thing to use
@Fletch6145 ай бұрын
Short single plane runners not working well with a wide lsa
@richardholdener17275 ай бұрын
single plan manifolds work the way they do regardless of the cam timing-if you change timing events to add power to a single plane, it adds power to a dual plane
@TomSmith-cv8hk Жыл бұрын
Single plane it's the adjacent runner openings into the plenum with intake valve opening overlap that miss out. 3 robs 1 and 8 robs 7. kzbin.info/www/bejne/q4faZHqvict7oqc
@gothicpagan.666 Жыл бұрын
On much smaller engines that I get to work on, 13.2-13.4 AFR is normally where the best power is. In all honesty there has to be a better inlet manifold available than what was tested. Realistically either of those is unusable.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
13.4? lean
@gothicpagan.666 Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 Everything has to be pretty much spot on. The right squish, dynamic CR 8-8.5:1, 102+ octain, coolant temp >86Deg C. On and on. The risk of melting a piston is always there, even engine rpm has to kept above peak torque for extra reliability. Needless to say I've had a few failures over the decades 🤤🙂
@JohnDushane-b2h Жыл бұрын
Sure looks like an intake gasket leak on the single plane
@dannypitts2442 Жыл бұрын
I see talking about green screen on live worked you got pic up there @Richard Holdner
@jimbob-s4b Жыл бұрын
Too lean, too long, too bad. Priceless.
@Prestiged_peck Жыл бұрын
And this is why you run multiport injection...
@bobqzzi Жыл бұрын
Take away: don't run carburetors.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
the carb is not the problem-would be the same with port efi
@bobqzzi Жыл бұрын
@@richardholdener1727 Except you can fix it with EFI pretty easily. Of course, you could run a tunnel ram or Webbers and it would fix it as well.
@imtheonevanhalen1557 Жыл бұрын
Can you say PORT VELOCITY??.......all of that yadda was just summed up. Street cars, dual plane...circle track WFO, single. And I'll say ALL of the lore of the Hemi is complete BS....ALL of the pro-stock Mopars ran wedge engines.....period.
@dominicanwar363 Жыл бұрын
EDELBROCK = a few red faces I bet.
@richardholdener1727 Жыл бұрын
this is a function of a single plane and dual plane design-not just Edelbrock
@dominicanwar363 Жыл бұрын
Thanks, I had no idea that air distribution was so bad. I had a V8 (back in the day) but it had individual carbs. Are OEM manifolds just as bad?