I would say that nowadays, you could use a lens that has great sharpness, good enough bokeh, and select the background very easily to reduce the contrast/clarity and get a dreamier look. However, you can't pull up sharpness when it's not there to begin with.
@DustinAbbottTWI10 ай бұрын
I agree that it is easier to reduce sharpness than to create it.
@Vantrakter10 ай бұрын
This has been true since there were digital cameras. How many people view an image at 100% though? If you don't you are just going to notice that very nice bokeh, and you don't have to mask it and postprocess it or ask the prompt to summon it
@sigurdrille969310 ай бұрын
Thank you! If I buy a f1,2 lens, I would need it to be sharper below f4...
@DustinAbbottTWI10 ай бұрын
I'm glad to help out.
@barret87 ай бұрын
maybe you didn't notice but the profile selected automatically by Lightroom is not the right one - there was a Fuji profile selected, not Sirui (I would be surprised if Lightroom even had profile for this lens)
@DustinAbbottTWI7 ай бұрын
I did notice, but the correction was pretty accurate.
@paulhopkins19053 ай бұрын
I think I'll stick with Nikkor for my 35mm purchase, I was looking at this cause I like the 23mm
@DustinAbbottTWI3 ай бұрын
Fair enough.
@robinbollens227610 ай бұрын
was hoping for a bit better image quality for these lenses. but my old minolta lenses are sharper than this and with less CA. too bad.
@DustinAbbottTWI10 ай бұрын
If you're looking for sharpness, then these lenses are a disappointment.
@PierGiorgioZuccaro8 ай бұрын
Buy this 33F1.2 version for Sony a6700. It's a shame because it's a real disappointment. It doesn't have the "sharpness" I was hoping for, really bad at F1.2 center and edges. Continue like this up to F5.6 to get something decent. I'm sorry to say that the Viltrox of equal focal length is of superior quality and not by a little. I expected an initial softness only in the edges at F1.2 with something decent in the center but no, that's not the case, the focus always remains "clouded". I would also add that the weight is notable compared to the competition which also boasts the external diaphragm ring. I think they should change their map, insert quality lenses (or better optical schemes) and charge a fair price for them and not offer lenses that then disappoint.
@DustinAbbottTWI8 ай бұрын
Sharpness is definitely not a strength.
@Eyeofkamau7 ай бұрын
It’s a video lens brother, not the clinical stale type that is priority for photography. Viltrox and Sigma are definitely better if you are seeking sharp lenses. For video, these are some of my favorite, even for photo tbh. The “flaws” are pros for me, as I love vintage character
@hhielscher10 ай бұрын
Why do I have to google that this lens is only for apsc?
@DustinAbbottTWI10 ай бұрын
I actually specifically say that it is APS-C and that the focal length is 50mm equivalent
@hhielscher10 ай бұрын
not in the introduction or in the description @@DustinAbbottTWI
@traffbros10 ай бұрын
Imagine the shock! You had to google yourself! Oh my! I think you need to make a compensation claim
@hhielscher10 ай бұрын
Previous videos mentioned APS-C in the title. That saved me quite some time.
@shakerman5510 ай бұрын
If you consider 20-30 seconds to type something in as “considerable time”, I would hate to see your attitude when waiting on your food at a restaurant. 🙄