EXTREME Density! The White Dwarf Star, Eddington, and Thermodynamics!

[@mdeasy]

My favorite scientist!!! Love every episode! Thanks for all the effort Dr. Robitaille!!!

[@sophiagodsfrend]

another fantastic video Dr. Robitaille! new images coming from the James Web Telescope are currently exposing the fatal flaws of contemporary astrophysical “science”… from those ashes your Phoenix will rise! God bless your integrity… and God bless you and your family! 🙏

[@Chris.Davies]

There is no need to put quotes around science. Science is a process, not a destination. Science is self-correcting over time, and Kuhnian paradigm shifts are not without pain or problems. Remember, science is performed by imperfect humans with large egos. And science is practically defined as the process of replacing good theories, with better theories. There are no Bad Theories. Only Good, and Better theories! The old model of the sun was indeed wrong, and mistakes were made - but science is in the process of correcting that mistake - just as it does with all mistakes.

[@alphaomega9033]

Sky Scholar's Deception of Reality WILL Catch him on JUDGEMENT DAY, We ARE ALL Suns from Heaven!

[@robertglynn1167]

Great to see you back Professor. The log jam is breaking. I can feel it. You're a true scientist.

[@gsdalpha1358]

Oh wow, my brain just 🤯. All these years of thinking a white star was the result of a "regular" star imploding. Also, thank you Dr. R. for explaining the math. It was a very rare occasion where my non-astro-anything brain could follow the equations! Excellent!!!!!

[@alphaomega9033]

Sky Scholar's Deception will be Dealt with On JUDGEMENT DAY, You MUST FULLY UNDERSTAND that You, I, and ALL Soul's On Earth ARE Heavenly Sun Body's of Antimaterial Puremotional Oceans of Eternal Angelical Christening Arms of Eternal Self-Aware Eternal White Light (White Robe's White Horse's Eternal Angelical White Light), Who Shines through My Heavenly Only Begotten Sun of Man's Astronomical Roaring Puremotional Nuclear Fusional Golden Spectral Grail's Arms of Eternal Life's Eternal Light onto My Ball of Dirt Heaven's On Mother Earth and In its Seas within a Materialistic Leaf's Flesh Body, from Our Heavenly Eternal Tree of Eternal Life's Eternal Light! The Material Flesh Body's Neuronic Web of Life and Love's Breath's Sensory' Sensors Senses of Touch Taste Smell Sight Hearing Hot Warm Cool Cold ALL Connected Directly to Your Eternal Angel's Self-Aware Soul Body's Ocean of Eternal Puremotion through the Flesh's Pituitary Gland, and Straight through My Heavenly Only Begotten Sun of Man's Astronomic Roaring Puremotional Nuclear Fusional Golden Spectral Grail's Arms of Eternal Life's Eternal Light, Straight to Your Soul's Heavenly Soular System's Sun Body's Arms of Eternal Light: THE BREATH OF LIFE AND IT IS DIRECT!

[@alphaomega9033]

We are ALL Suns from Heaven ALL Souls Shining through My Heavenly Only Begotten Sun of Man's Astronomic Roaring Puremotional Nuclear Fusional Golden Spectral Grail's Arms of Eternal Life's Eternal Light!

[@MrSkypelessons]

Thanks, Pierre. Another great lecture

[@ghislainchabot1601]

Finally, somebody that makes sense with common sense!!!!! I just started a spectroscopy project in my personal observatory and always questioned how accurate the science-based physics are? Now, watching this video gives me hope that I'm on the right track ! Thank you, Dr. ROBITAILLE !!!!! Being French Canadian myself, you have a big fan in me.😊

[@alephmoodie6950]

vivre le Québec libre

[@TruthFrequencyNews]

THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU! Most who talk on such topics while swearing black hole exist, speak in supercilious, formulaic term to confuse the listener. Doc, you speak clearly, you don't try to dazzle folks with brilliance OR baffle them with Bullsh**. You explained your arguments, well. Thank you!

[@kimberleebrackley2793]

Always a pleasure, Dr.Robitaille. Stay strong and keep safe:)

[@mrm5823]

Excellent explanation.

[@tomwojcik9342]

Great Exposé! Looking forward to your tutorial on Red-Shifts 🙂

[@Thermiable]

Makes perfect sense. Thanks!

[@alphaomega9033]

That is a Absolute Lie, Sky Scholar's Deception Will be Dealt with On JUDGEMENT DAY, We ARE ALL Suns from Heaven ALL Shining through My Heavenly Only Begotten Sun of Man's Astronomic Roaring Puremotional Nuclear Fusional Golden Spectral Grail's Arms of Eternal Life's Eternal Light!

[@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT]

Thank you Dr. Robitaille! Another powerful blow to the established mindset, that sure needs a makeover, now that JWST has started punching holes in existing theories.

[@davidbarnkow5595]

I do not possess the math skills necessary to check Dr. Robitaille's assertion that Eddington's logic was failed. But I can understand how intensive properties are not equal to non-intensive values. And to his credit Dr. Robitaille puts his reasoning out in plain view for critical examination by his detractors. Thank you Dr. Robitaille for your intellectual bravery and honesty.

[@GraemeWight-wx3xz]

Hello from Edinburgh Scotland. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🤝🇺🇸

[@michelangelou7]

🤯 Can't wait for more

[@roldanching]

God bless you Dr. Robitaille..!! Wow..!!

[@rebeccajosteelman563]

Good morning, Dr. Robitaille.

[@doltBmB]

Another excellent presentation.

[@comrad011]

Thank you so much dr R for your great effort to explain all these things to us . this is the real science we all miss nowadays

[@critical-thought]

Thank you! Excellent reasoning, as always.

[@davestorm6718]

I'm wondering about the Ideal Gas Law and it's foundational assumptions when considering large structures (that cannot be duplicated in the laboratory), that foundation is that collisions are perfectly elastic. I don't like this assumption as it, to me anyway, appears to be an oversimplification. Certainly some deformation must occur at the atomic/molecular level, but it is so miniscule, we cannot possibly replicate it in the laboratory. Naturally, these laws work just fine, at the scale that we invoke them (calculations), and they approximate what can be duplicated nearly perfectly every time (probably why it was dubbed a Law). How would the stellar calculations work if gases aren't "ideal"? Point #2: Over 3 decades ago, we made a computer program that was designed to show how a system of elements (not necessary "elements" as in periodic table elements, but individual constituents of an FEA model) with each "element" given the property of attraction (say, like gravity, but not specific in the model) and, these elements would lost some kinetic energy over time (simulated: think of the simple "bouncing ball" program in introductory computer graphics programming simulating gravity - though extrapolate to all "balls"), and, at a certain point (defined in the program), each element would stick, thus accumulating into a continually bigger ball (all done in 2D with the initial conditions of all elements being roughly equally spaced inside a circle for time=0, or page=0 of the animation in computer terms). That was a flat 2D array (each element was a pixel). We also wanted to know what happened with pressure between any 2 or more elements, so that was done on a separate array (looking at the first to add up ALL contributions of compression from all points at a given time - or step or page) and expected the highest pressure zone to be in the center. What happened, was after hours of iterations, the highest pressure zone was not in the center, but in a ring between the center and the outside of the 2D circle. Tweaked on this for a couple of weeks, but no matter what, we couldn't get the model to maximize it's pressure in the center. It was simply abandoned (the project was for another student's thesis on black holes, he needed a model to show basically infinite compression at the center, and our model failed to demonstrate this). What I figured out, after many thought experiments, was that current models in physics always seem to be using an externally compressed system, whereby External forces are applied tangentially to a circle (or sphere), like a sphere underwater (all pressure at the exterior is summated at the center - it's a linear function). This is NOT the same thing as a system of self-compression (where each element acts as an attractor to each other element w/the reach of that attraction diminishing, nonlinearly, with distance)! This is what my model was doing (doesn't matter what the force is, just that it be attractive - monopole). I plan on revisiting this model (all the code was lost years ago), but in 3D using GPU and much higher resolution to see if I can demonstrate this interesting find. In 3D, the maxima of density would be in a shell, somewhere between the center and the surface [of a sphere]. Anyway, I thought I'd put this out there for others to consider. If my model is correct, a couple of immediate conclusions can be made: 1) It's impossible for a star to create a black hole, period. 2) No matter how much mass you add to it, the shell of highest pressure will simply expand and there is a limit that scales (no runaway conditions could ever be present). 3) There would be a point in the star's development where this shell could potentially become unstable (via external cosmic events). In that case, the shell would implode and the star would implode, then explode in an incredible display (supernova). It would also, in my opinion, create matter expulsions from the poles (the "thinner" zones). 4) The rotation of a star would make the shell slightly thinner at the poles meaning less fusion reactions and hence, less emissions. 5) Fusion reactions would not originate from the core. 6) If the lattice is LMH, then that zone would not extend to the core. 7) light would not need to travel as far, though the shell might act as a container. 8) For cosmic distances, the star could treated as a single point (the center of gravity would also be the physical center) in calculations of motion. So no problem here. (a hollow sphere, for example has no mass at the center, but it's center of gravity is in the center). 9) A star could technically have a resonance (it could "ring"). Last thing to note is that my model is, by no means, comprehensive, but I would like to extend this concept to others and see if it has some merit or can be corroborated with supporting evidence from astronomical observations. I created the model in the way very similar to how FEA (Finite Element Analysis) to solve very complex problems (e.g. fluid dynamics, energy transfer in amorphous materials, etc) where a simple mathematical model is difficult to create (or would take an unacceptable amount of time to compute). Like a neural network, FEA can reveal emergent properties of highly complex systems that may not be immediately apparent to a researcher.

[@Kenzofeis]

There are simulations of all sorts of things, yours I have never seen mention of before, only mention of the same phenomenon - like, if we drilled a hole to the center of the planet, one, at the center, would be pulled outwards. You should do that project :)

[@davestorm6718]

@@Kenzofeis Ah, yes. You definitely understand what I'm talking about. Now, take that concept (hovering in the center because all forces are pulling in all directions and balancing out), AND now fill that hole with matter! Will it suddenly feel high compression? No, it will not. This simple thought experiment should be obvious to a 5th grader, right? Now, it's off to looking for papers in astrophysics that are using the wrong model (external compression) either directly or derived from it. I believe there are many and this will certainly invoke a frenzied plethora of discussion. Things will be broken, mud shall be slung. I'll enjoy this!

[@Kenzofeis]

@@davestorm6718 It seems so counterintuitive, but there is only one way to find out ^^ Good luck, I hope to find the video later sometime

[@louisvictor3473]

This reminds me in a way of one computer simulation I once saw about a "hollow Earth". I put it in quotes because I don't mean the usual hypothesis out there where people are 100% sure there is an inner sun, and super humans, yada yada yada. I do mean it literally and merely descrepitively, as in the center is a cavity, and that is all there is to the it. Anyway, it was about simuilating waves from earth quakes. There are a few detections in zones felt on the opposite side of the earth that aren't well explained with the standard model that assumes that density increases towards the center and maxes out there. So what this guy did was make a simulation assuming that density increases then decreases towards the center, down to having a hollow core (in terms of solid and "solid enough" matter, that is, low viscosity and density liquids and gases didn't factor in the model iirc). And voila, it does seem to better explain the emergence of the aforementioned waves. It is been a while so I forgot the exact terminology, but that is the gist of it. This also does match my own investigations (granted, far more lazy). Simply put, the idea that the center would be the maximum of desity makes little sense to me. Take the standard model of the Earth. It says the Earth's inner core is a mere 1.8% of Earth's mass. And it is not exactly one physical object with the rest since it is surrounded by a liquid core (30% of the mass), and that is surrounded by a solid mantle (67%). It is really a ball inside a sphere with hot "water" in between, sorta. How did that form? There is literally 97% of the mass of the Earth pulling the object in the center apart in all directions. Sure, at the perfect center, you could say the force of gravity is net zero, but it is still being pulled apart. And since we are not dealing with a mathmatical point but a physical object with volume, different parts of the object would be pulled more strongly towards different parts. It sounds like it has to have this shell effect you're talking about, I mean, if we magically "delete" the liquid core, the forces would be smaller, but now even the illusion it is all just one object is gone. Would we expect the inner ball to be perfectly intact and unmovable at the center? Not really. Probably would expect the inner ball to be torn apart into pieces, like a moon that got too close to its parent planet, but inside out. Or at the very least, we would expect that whatever deviation from a perfectly centered perfectly smooth ball within a perfectly smooth shell sphere would lead to the inner ball quickly not being centered anymore, and none of these objects are perfect geometric shapes. Now, put the liquid back again. Sure, liquid is not a vacuum or even a gas, but it still closer to that than a solid in relevant ways here. So why should we then assume the inner core would always center it self while slushing around in that hot soup? This model doesn't seem to hold water to me. If one has to threat things as if external pressure was being applied just so the model holds, as if we came up with a conclusion first and then tried to figure out what sort of maths are necessary to generate this conclusion, I say that model is not good enough.

[@davestorm6718]

@@louisvictor3473 The physics student was the one who asked me if I could do a generative simulation, with no initial assumptions made or any kind of forcing. I said yes and suggested finite element analysis (which I heard about from my father - they were using it at his company, and, at the time, was a burgeoning technology in software analysis in the 1980s), which, I actually didn't really know much about. Computers pretty much sucked back then (college years), but I figured it was doable (mind you, I attempted in QBasic, but settled on Fortran as it could be run on their IBM system). The nice thing about FEA is you basically assign properties to elements (not like periodic table elements, but constituents), set up starting conditions, and run it. It's a lot like early artificial creatures in simple AI demonstrations with very simple properties and actions each critter takes then see what happens over thousands of iterations: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZnzbZYxvibuAfck Back in the late 80s, this kind of stuff wasn't really in the mainstream (that I know of), so we had to do it all from scratch (limited memory, usage of arrays, and some matrix math, etc). Unfortunately, we could only do this in 2D - (remember, you have to calculate the strength of all forces for ALL elements, determine motion for ALL elements, etc, for every iteration. I think this was a 16bit system, but I could be wrong (so freaking long ago), but it took a long time to run and there were fights with the staff as they would force the job to end before we could get enough iterations done to see the results, but fortunately, we got permission to do a long run over a Sunday. As i said before, we thought we made a mistake (and the physics student said he couldn't use it), so everything was abandoned (I had others look at the code and no one really saw any problems, back then, but completely forgot about it until a year ago).

[@beowulfshaeffer8444]

I think plasma instability is just about the only other mechanism we could invoke besides your condensation idea (and it would probably just lead to the condensation mechanism anyway). I'm curious to see more experimentation.

[@barleyarrish]

You can't fool all of the people all of the time. PMR & SC the Dynamic Duo of Physic's

[@keithnorris6348]

I did enjoy the video today as I have enjoyed all that you and other electric star / cosmos and liquid with metalic, Hydrogen lattice, and now diamond allotrope form surfaced stars have made and shown. I am looking forward to the next video and I hope you and all the readers will have a good time between now and the next gem, thank you.

[@Mistral434]

I think we’ll never fully understand how stars work until we begin to understand how consciousness permeates/precedes matter. I believe we will eventually be forced to concede that the Earth is “alive” shortly followed by the sun being alive. Somehow self-organizing, entropy-reducing.

[@fredfarquar8301]

If one postulates that the universe came about through a quantum mechanical fluctuation or glitch, then the only thing that could allow that fluctuation to continue to exist would be the presence of an ‘observer’ to collapse the wave function (as with Shroedinger’s cat box being opened). This would seem to indicate that everything that exists, matter, energy, space and time themselves, ALL have some level of awareness or consciousness. Bell’s Theorem buttresses this idea, since it demands that, in some way, at some level, there is no separation of anything from anything else (“nonlocality”), and therefore everything that exists is ONE. That ONE is the observer that kept/keeps it all going. Some might call it God?

[@zachreyhelmberger894]

@@fredfarquar8301Well there is this: Hebrews 1:3 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, SUSTAINING ALL THINGS BY HIS POWERFUL WORD. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven." and this: 1Corinthians 8:6 6yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we exist. And there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we exist."

[@carlubambi5541]

Good subject Pierre !

[@razorcain74]

Awesome Doc!

[@Sir-Cyr_Rill-Nil-Mill]

this is now on the *_Minds_*_ platform_

[@GoodmanBrown1]

Welcome to the astronomy revolution. Black holes and singularities belong in the dust bins. They will eventually be joined by the multiverse.

[@Kenzofeis]

Excellent idea, they can take care of all the garbage ^^

[@lmwlmw4468]

Another great video Dr. Robitaille.

[@KevinRavensberg]

Very educational! I'd be interested in gas giants and supergiants too, maybe those are more gaseous than main-sequence stars? Or in the process of condensing while emitting light?

[@FaTeAnimationVault]

Simply amazing. Very grateful for all your hard work and insights.

[@x5-acousticguitarstuff.2]

Come back and read the Donald Trump Question above your comment.

[@FaTeAnimationVault]

@@x5-acousticguitarstuff.2 I don't engage in politics. I do know that the Trump regime moved internally confined fusion out of classified weapons research into publicly allowable research and if you don't apply for a patent title 17 (ITAR export compliance) doesn't apply to your work. To be honest I hope Dr. Robitaille just deletes those kinds of comments.

[@multi_misa72]

Thank you doc, for your work and dedication, and I look forward to your next video. I hope we can find out soon.

[@JoshuaTreeObservatory]

I look forward to your presentation and presence at the upcoming Demysticon 2024 conference in Austin, TX April 7-8 during the total solar eclipse!

[@tonyb8660]

ah, the warm canadian greeting, with that enthusiastic pointing

[@MsKatjie]

What is that mate, " Heil Trudoe, dictator of the forma free country, once known as Canada, now Transfaga. " Sorry to inject political nonsense into this amazing forum. Just thinking about gas collapsing in a vacuum and it seems absurd, as does so much, " science", these days. Remember, as so with climate fraud, the science is finished, no more to question there.

[@KenNeumeister]

The example is intriguing in raising a question of whether a star can experience a global change in lattice structure such as from hexagonal to diamond or back, and if this may occur quickly, and what would that look like when it happens. In the carbon analog, diamond can be burned to produce soot, or soot can be compressed into diamond.

[@michelangelou7]

Laws for thee but not for me - Eddy

[@muntee33]

Had me at the mention of Eddington.

[@TheFifthWorld22]

Humans are Stars 🌟

[@bonsang1073]

what about octahedron shaped lattice?

[@whaleoilbeefhooked3892]

Radiation pressure exerted upon a surface due to the exchange of momentum between an object and the electromagnetic field obeys the momentum of light or electromagnetic radiation absorption rate for any wavelength that can be physically absorbed, reflected, or otherwise emitted by matter on any scale, but of an otherwise undefined mass?

[@MrWolynski]

Can you rephrase that?

[@whaleoilbeefhooked3892]

@@MrWolynski kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZu2qnWGnLlkmJI

[@deathsheadknight2137]

are you asking or telling?

[@alex79suited]

Told ya. Peace 😎 ✌️

[@johnfirth6541]

Very very interesting! Looking forward to seeing more about other stellar types and stellar evolution. Just remembered seeing a vid about a white dwarf called ZTF J1901+1458, nicknamed Janus because the spectroscopy indicates one side of it shows mostly hydrogen and the other side shows mostly helium. The discoverers evoked strong magnetic fields as possible way to allow such weird mixing/overturning within the star. Your new LMH model will need to be used to try to explain such phenomena, if their spectroscopic analysis is correct. Not that you personally have to explain every single object out there, but someone would. I'm only a geologist but its hard for me to envision helium forming a lattice.

[@raykeller6693]

Does a proton stars or stars in general, contain a neutron star at its core? What’s the current theory?

[@fredfarquar8301]

In this video, Dr. Robataille showed that black holes cannot form. The same would have to be true of ‘neutronium’ and ‘neutron stars’.

[@peacepoet1947]

The condensing of hydrogen and helium gasses in the early universe formed the SEEDS for stars. Was static electricity created by the movement of particles throughout the universe that ended up making the BIRKIN CURRENTS that light up the stars?

[@raykeller6693]

In star formation, are you saying that G-collapse is not possible for a perfect gas but that the pre-stellar cloud is actually a liquid hydrogen phenomenon?

[@kiloharabaka9589]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXvJYYCObpt4iLssi=bjW2QQUOwwA6MmQQ

[@mohanrajaloganathan5587]

While agree with you on star could be liquid metallic hydrogen, don't you think electricity plays role in creating stars? Look at hour glass shaped stars, dont you think zpinch is creating those stars?

[@ryanhegseth8720]

Is it just me or does this guy make a lot of sense?

[@drscott1]

👍🏼

[@timothy8426]

Heat is forward maximum momentum velocity in resistance. Perpetual motion of heat propulsion from cold repulsion into cold repulsion as magnetic fields. No negative fields. Electrons are sparks that light up. Sparks are heat striking resistance of mass. Lightning strikes as heat decay of atmospheric mass. Causing a void of cold repulsion of space no longer occupied by mass, a void. Proximity atmosphere slamming shut on the void as thunder, heat resonating waves. Earth's magnetic field is cold repulsion to both heat forward momentum pole through earth's magnetic field into cold repulsion at the other pole as redirected trajectories of thermaldynamics singularities into cycling circulation patterns of magnetic fields. Quatum magnetic fields are redirected trajectories of force of pressure towards the greater magnetic field of synchronization of flow bonding force or grounding of heat. Stars decay as heat loss of waves as dark energy outside of entanglement of mass. When this dark energy encounters mass, dark energy becomes renewable, and energy heat singularities strike resistance as electrons spark light. Daylight is sparks in chain reactions as the atmosphere is a filament, exchanging heat singularities through mass until resistance is overcome by open space itself as dark energy outside of entanglement of mass as distance of forward maximum momentum is maximized again. The cosmic speed limit is constant in and out of entanglement. Distance is reduced by entanglement of mass. Once dark energy outside of entanglement of mass distance is restored to maximum distance. Theoretically factual probability that works with quantum physics without gravity. Magnetism is the force of pressure known as weight. All mass occupies space as cold repulsion within and without.

[@xkguy]

Robitaille 1, Edington 0 Thanks again Dr. Robitaille!

[@FelonyVideos]

With more understanding now, I think that there is a minimum radius/mass for the seed material required to begin condensation. A body the size of earth cannot accumulate hydrogen, or even helium. A body the size of Jupiter seems like it is MUCH closer to "critical mass". Assuming there was a big bang, solids or liquids must have been ejected, in order to start the process of star formation. With even a single large condensed mass, heavier elements could have been fused to allow seeds for newer stars. Interesting.

[@danielarcher369]

Is it possible that the radius for white dwarf stars is correct? I made a paper about this, "What if White Dwarf Stars Are Actually Earth Like Planets"...

[@alphaomega9033]

Affect effect, effect affect, affect effect, effect affect. Now continue with this Fourier of the following words: Antimatter Matter... Action Reaction... Impression Expression... Spirit Charictar...

[@KaliFissure]

Space is dielectric. Charged gasses will have a stronger charge interaction and form plasma more readily. Plasmotic binding is how these things start. Condensing, releasing photos which become charge again if absorbed

[@t00by00zer]

Marklund convection

[@KaliFissure]

@t00by00zer yes. Exactly. Ideal gas has no binding forces. And yet in free space, because all charges are extremely localized there are intense binding forces which fusion energy needs to learn how to FINESSE. Right now I think we are using hammers.

[@KaliFissure]

@dunravin because there is nothing there there is nothing to carry charge AWAY and so it is a perfect dielectric This is experimental FACT

[@t00by00zer]

@@KaliFissure Fusion takes place in electrical discharges, right here on earth in the form of elemental transmutation. During a discharge, free protons stripped away from water molecules are free to interact with nitrogen or oxygen ions. And because we've observed gamma rays, we know nuclear reactions are taking place. The atmosphere of the sun is in a state of constant discharge, and turbulent plasma abounds, and therefore, magnetic fields. All the ingredients needed for fusion.

[@KaliFissure]

@@t00by00zer and yet they don't include it in stellar formation?

[@2sipsMax]

Thanks for sharing.

[@wolkenbummler]

Is it possible that the implications that your work has for "modern" climate science, is a major hurdle for acceptance by the "main stream"? Thank you very much for sharing work.

[@cerebralm]

No, it doesn't matter how the sun creates the energy it does, climate scientists can treat it as a black box that emits whatever it is observed to emit. Climate scientists are ignoring the nearly eight-thousand-mile-across droplet of white-hot molten metal and silicates churning right beneath our feet. It's a non-trivial contributor to the temperature of the biosphere and the moving magnetic pole PROVES that it's convection patterns are changing right now.

[@alphaomega9033]

How can I interact with Sky Scholar, directly?

[@Cat_rustler]

Cool stuff!

[@adampetrowsky1771]

👍

[@mikegodzina3648]

What would cause the lattice to be different in a white dwarf?

[@Kenzofeis]

Pigmentation..?

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

We definitely see young galaxies low on or without heavy elements suggesting process that would need to sit idly by 12 billion years doing nothing before collapse . You can't get curvature without mass displacement of space creating the by product of gravity to create such critical extreme states .after the fact things are more simple to think about. Its a similar issue to orgin of life and countless other feilds failing in similar ways over time line of thought. Static in a gas undergoing ionization from secondary sources is only feasible after the fact of many suns ,galaxies etc etc etc.

[@donethos]

Perhaps it is the core itself which has the massivity of a diamond lattice, being supercharged through friction of gaseous plasmatic outer ionized particles, creating the external luminosity, ergo the core itself would hold a positive charge, pushing other objects away. Should this structure collapse onward upon itself, that would therefore not rule out the possibility of black holes.

[@brubrusuryoutube]

at 11:40 you say area and luminosity are not an extensive properties... im pretty sure area and luminosity ARE an EXTENSIVE properties, but i get they cancel out to give an intensive property same when you call radius non extensive.... what is an extensive property but pure radius of an object? i am beyond confused with the demonstration

[@svartvist]

After studying Halton Arp's analyses of quasars, I've concluded that stars are formed in that hot plasma as they cool down and mass begins to accumulate, as Arp implied. I've never accepted the idea that nebulae are stellar nurseries, but rather the result of flaring "young" stars. Kozyrev (Prog in Phy 10-05) showed that the internal temperature of a star (6MK) is insufficient for nuclear reaction, therefore incapable of sustaining fusion of hydrogen. One must look elsewhere for the source of energy fueling a star and review the concept of star "life-cycle." Edward Dowdye showed that gravitational lensing does not happen--it is an artifact of a sun's plasma sphere, the same as on Earth when observing sunsets or moonsets. If gravitational redshift is a true principle, then one ought to observe color shifting of light in the presence of a strong magnetic field, for magnetic fields are 10^39 times stronger than gravity, and magnetic fields are always present (produced by) charge-flow, the only reasonable source for gravitational force.

[@VDP207]

Everyone can rest easy knowing I've fact checked everything on this one😂 and everything looks to be above board. God speed sir!!

[@muntee33]

Why does the ecliptic plane, and other similar disks of rotating matter, seem to be occupying the same region / medium as the dielectric plane in a magnetic field? Just as the visually alluring displays in cymatics show the grains of sand being 'magically' arranged in geometric patterns, which is simply the sand being 'compelled' towards the node points of a standing wave, where they experience the least disruption and displacement and have the most optimal rest state... The dielectric plane, aka ecliptic plane, is akin to a equatorial node point of a 1st harmonic, standing wave. Ie; dipole magnetic field. Wouldn't it make sense that either mass or charge experiences the least disruption/displacement in this region and are able to achieve the most optimal rest state? (or stability of some nature/degree) And why celestial objects entering the inner solar system from higher latitudes often display more energetic 'gaseous outflows' (which to me, is intuitively just a more energetic discharge of charge/radiation as the object has a respectively higher rest state from inhabiting a region with higher degrees of distruption/displacement ((pressure, of sorts)) which induces a higher energetic potential in the object. The object seeks to achieve a more optimal rest state as it enters a region/medium where the lower disruption/displacement facilitates such an equaibrium. *This is also why we can't yet safely land a manned lunar mission at/near the moons poles, as the soacecraft approached the polar surface the energetic potential difference would cause a rapid equalisation as the ionization chamnels available to the charge are extremely limited, restricting its ability to safely n slowly equalise charge potentials and with the spacecraft descending rapidly, the threshold for a 'spark gap' to be crossed would occur before the available molecules that could bleed the difference off through ionisation could keep up with the growing 'pressure' of the voltage potential.... Any thougts on the ecliptic plane actually being the dielectric plane? Ie; the node point of a dipole magnetic moment/field/wave?

[@alphalima6810]

Do you suppose the pursuit of nuclear fusion might be impeded by virtue of a misunderstanding of the Sun's makeup?

[@stevecrothers6585]

Yes! Iter will get nothing. Come back to SkyScholar in a day or two for coverage of this.

[@robbolastname6799]

Yeah thanks P.M.,R. you just devalued my wife's weeding ring, ... seems diamonds are common, everywhere, and for the real kicker at least Earth sized. LOL.

[@louisvictor3473]

Oh boy, that wasn't PMR who devalued her ring... it is just how it is, the price of jewlery grade diamonds is 100% artificial and manipulated. Diamond is hardly rare, and the whole "pricey diamond wedding ring" shebang was literally social engineering to move stock by a company that is essentially a global monopoly on diamonds. The entire thing is complete lunacy, really. I mean, if it has sentimental value between the two of you that you built, good on y'all, not bashing that. But that is a very different conversation.

[@theroguetomato5362]

I beg to differ. I farted and that ideal gas collapsed into a black hole. In other words, I blamed it on someone else.

[@Chris.Davies]

I am a simple man indeed: Pierre-Marie uploads a video. I watch the video. I enjoy the video. I upvote the video. SIMPLE! I am leaving links to your channel at all other channels that persist in their delusions about a gassy sun. I am sure it is earning me a lot of thumbs down from people who aren't curious, but we have to try - right?

[@phyarth8082]

The Hawking radiation temperature of black hole is T∝1/M and that is some ridiculous equation first mass is extensive property and temperature is intensive and all other terms inside are physics constants but temp. of star is inverse proportional to its mass, more fuel you put into Sun more colder it happens. That is opposite what is happens on earth more fuel you throw on firewood more brighter it happens. White Dwarf - if radius is 100 times smaller but luminosity is equal to star with 100 times bigger radius thus both star have same temperature T. It means and and mass of both stars must be equal. It must magical mechanism to compress smaller radius star to such density, and principle of starts radiation is self gravitation. The only way to explain is epsilon grey body coefficients are different of both stars or mainstream science must search another explanation to such discrepancies in theories.

[@t00by00zer]

Marklund convection is the source of accretion.

[@Alasdair-Morrison]

I bet you'd have a bloody hard time convincing Neil DeGrasse Tyson of any of this. Be like Nope! nope! nope! lol

[@twentyeighthunnid]

Tyson is irrelevant af. What's he done but being a bimbo whore propagandist gate keeper? Let us let him leave our minds, please.

[@alphaomega9033]

The Fourier of our universe's law of existence's law of the land's quantum entanglement's quantum mechanical eternal pair of dice: Both Beis of Eternal Life and Love's Bell.

[@MrWolynski]

Comment for algorithm

[@michaelshireman8565]

Ty for the truth.

[@brendablock8790]

'PromoSM' 😢

[@maxhubert3785]

Second, love u

[@Nuts-Bolts]

Ah. First for once!

[@romado59]

JuMBOs effected by planet and star formation or does opacity limit and Z-pinch affect them? kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHqzqISteqhgfLM

[@jamesconway9277]

Kirchhoff's law can be seen to be wrong by geology. If the impinging on the Earth had always been the same, there would be no boarders in the layers. Every boarder layer proves that the laws and constants of physics have changed thru time.

[@grinch5263]

I always thought Eddington to be a fraud for going to a remote island during a solar eclipse to "prove" gravitational lensing when his media stunt can be disproven by a rising full moon on a clear night. The plasma atmosphere of a body between the viewer and the lensed object is the lens in both cases.

[@alphaomega9033]

How Analytical is your Eternal puremotional Self-Aware Soul body's Intelligent Mathematical Formulaic Analysis of My Word?

[@alphaomega9033]

Creation and your soul's heavenly Soular System's Sun Body's Atomic, Diatomic Triatomic astronomical inorganic and organic interstellar molecular matters eternal Relation to my and our eternal creation of life and love's breath, in the beginning.

[@raykeller6693]

My long used term “Soular System”, seems to be getting around. It makes the right implication: Heaven, is the Soular System, our real Home. I think this may have been changed by the Romans, to keep us blind to the spiritual Reality. It would not be an alien term to the Pythagoreans nor the Egyptians. I use it in conjunction with something I call the “Philosophy of Cosmic Affection”…a reclamation of Zoroastrian and Pythagorean Philosophy.

[@alphaomega9033]

​@@raykeller6693, I have now fully Analyzed Sky Scholar's work here, and I have found his Analyzing is NOT Valid! We are ALL Heavenly Oceans of Puremotional Antimaterial Nuclear Fusional Self-Aware Eternal Sun Body's of Eternal Angelical White Light Interacting with Our Body of Our Universe's Atomic Particuly Eternal Keeping Your Eternal Self-Awareness Attached to Your Eternal Ocean of Puremotion!

[@alphaomega9033]

Earth's expanse's statical electromagnetical forcefield's "Black Hole's" Bottomless Pit's Judgement Day's Worldwide Flood.

[@garnet4846]

Lol, lights in the sky, nothing more.

[@muntee33]

Hands up who wants to see NDGT debate this Sir Sky Scholar bloke here? 🙋🦧🐬🦅🐙🦞🙌🕺💃👻