WR102. A star that is 200,000 degrees hotter than the Sun.

[@Kosmo_off]

Hello everyone! How was the video? Has it given you food for speculation? If you are a fan of our videos, feel free to support our project here: ➥ Support us on KZbin - www.youtube.com/@kosmo_off/join ➥ Support us on Patreon - www.patreon.com/kosmo_off

[@dennisagbayani3327]

Thanks so much for posting this & all your really interesting, well-researched & expertly explained science stuff. This video, like all your others, has given me a smorgasbord of fascinating ideas to masticate, digest, ruminate, assimilate & speculate. Keep safe & healthy & God bless 🧔

[@razzikhan1980]

Thanks for the video and data for the new class of stars as well as astronomy. Your work is highly appreciated man.

[@rexmann1984]

The ultimate Shikadov thruster. 😎

[@LiLi-or2gm]

Excellent video! Having just finished Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir, I couldn't help but think of _astrophage_ and what it could do with a super-hot star (assuming there is a source of CO2 in the star system, which seems kind of unlikely, but still fun to speculate about)!

[@colinvannurden3090]

Hahaha

[@genericdragon7260]

I'm 70 years old and a supernova visible to the naked eye would be a gift from the Universe! Go Betelgeuse!

[@lost2weeks245]

I'm afraid it will take some thousand if not millions of years for it to finally go into a supernova

[@robinswamidasan]

@@lost2weeks245 Actually, it could go supernova anytime within the next 100,000 years.

[@LDRAGO1705]

In heaven?

[@barrymak421]

It would definitely be something! Think if it did it during the summer time if you are in the northern hemisphere. You could look up and see it during the day time.

[@nogod7184]

Betelgeuse is approximately 650 light years away. If it goes supernova today, you won't see it until 650 years later, the year 2670. Hope you live that long.

[@LaibaStarXX]

Da real miss universe, since she’s the hottest star🔥🥵

[@lightscore96]

No, that’s Miss Philippines 🇵🇭 💫

[@henriklarsen8140]

But not that bright?

[@Stoic_quotes1]

no miss south Africa (lol)

[@BigCroca]

@@lightscore96 i prefer miss joe

[@markjacob9497]

@@lightscore96 alas she clapped

[@mitchellgeier4436]

Thank you for making videos better than anything I had growing up.

[@ChuckerA]

Yeah it's a great video and you are a beautiful lady oh well I got something out of it I don't never get nothing no other way so I'll do it this way

[@mitchellgeier4436]

@@ChuckerA thats my wife! Know any women named Mitchell

[@RedOctober_]

@@ChuckerA lmao simp

[@TheNinjakat2010]

@@mitchellgeier4436 lol people say Obamas wife is a Michelle.

[@TheNinjakat2010]

@@RedOctober_ yup never assume the pic is real

[@Cipher71]

I'm an astrophysicist and I just wanted to clear up a few things that I think you misunderstood in the video: •Lighter stars actually burn LONGER than heavier stars. It's true that the amount of fuel they have available increases as they get larger, but they also burn it FASTER. WAY faster as a matter of fact. It's sort of like how a Humvee holds more total gas than a Coup but it burns it so fast that it will run out sooner. Also small stars are fully CONVECTIVE, so ALL of the star's mass gets cycled into the core to get burned as fuel. Larger stars don't do this as the layer above the core is fully RADIATIVE, i.e. gas can't sink below it, only light comes out of it. Imagine turning on the AC at your house without turning on the vent fan to actually push it through the vents. Same idea. •stars that go supernova (those that are >8 times the mass of the sun) don't become white dwarves, they either become Neutron Stars or Black Holes. Stars smaller than that will become white dwarves but they never go supernova. The layers above the core just sort of keep expanding and expanding until all that's left is the core, which is a white dwarf. •Stars don't undergo chemical reactions in their cores, they undergo nuclear reactions. Chemical reactions involve bonds between electrons that are bound to atomic nuclei, but there are no electrons bound to nuclei in the core. It's so hot that all the nuclei and electrons are free from each other. Nuclear reactions are things like protons and neutrons binding to each other in the nucleus. They are MILLIONS of times more energetic than chemical bonds.

[@arsenicuu]

watching this video I have noticed these things too. Riddled with inaccuracies and mistakes

[@davidt8087]

It's just desperate greedy morons who know nothing making videos with fake voices on topics theyre clueless about to get ad money. Block them from your feed

[@rift8966]

Yeah, unfortunately this is not the first of their videos riddled with inaccuracies. By the way, I was under the impression that a black hole can only form if the star remnant is greater than 5 solar masses, and typically a star with a solar mass greater than 20 is capable of leaving behind a remnant of 5 solar masses or greater.

[@ComaDave]

Fun fact: there is at least one Wolf-Rayet star easily visible at night. Gamma Velorum is a quadruple star system in the constellation of Vela, and one of the components is a WC8 star. The system is approximately 1,200 light years from Earth.

[@GoogleAccount-gv7lk]

There is also another Wolf-Rayet star visible to the naked eye named Theta Muscae, also in the southern celestial hemisphere, although it is way fainter than Gamma2 Velorum, just barely visible to the naked eye in a dark sky area. Like WR 102, it is also notably a very hot star, estimated to be over 80,000 Kelvin. It is also a multiple star system, like Gamma2 Velorum.

[@Drivertilldeath]

Frostpunk music, very nice

[@Arwing67]

That Frostpunk Music. Unexpected. Fitting, but unexpected.

[@DrVoodoo]

Oh, I thought it sounded familiar! :v

[@P4ndaBear]

I WAS JUST ABOUT TO SAY!

[@werallgnnadieintheend]

The thumbnail agrees with the Wein's Displacement law according to which, the highest temperature (hottest star) should have the shortest wavelength (violet). Nice.

[@cyrilio]

you definitely uped your graphics game for this video

[@pixelsafoison]

You like it? It's too "americanish" for my taste, too few facts, too much key jingling

[@alternate7773]

@@pixelsafoison You really should not expect a lot of facts on a star that we barely understand yet.

[@pixelsafoison]

@Bujf vjg now that's just mean, you know full well that no one can get his hands on a good graphics card at MSRP and yet here you are.... You sir have reached a whole new level of cruelty.

[@maurizioibba869]

Thank you Sergey, as usually great video, I been learning a lot through your tutorials. The narrative combined with the animation and the captivating graphics make easier to assimilate this type of information which would be boring to digest from books. Keep up with the good work.

[@GFox...]

Considering that 94 % of the universe is moving away from us so quickly that we will never be able to actually visit.....it is quite a thing to say this is the "hottest star on the universe "!!

[@data1.078]

Yes. Such inaccurate descriptions make me not to take channels like Kosmo serious.

[@kingley45]

@@data1.078 or you can use your brain and think that it’s the hottest star in the observable universe that we have found.

[@adamhughes4442]

Hottest in the observable universe. Not the hottest. Nobody knows that!!!!!

[@rift8966]

@@kingley45 Maybe not be a twat next time pointing that out?

[@Strype13]

I've been watching Anton Petrov, John Michael Godier, Astrum, SpaceRip, and SEA for several years and this channel has NEVER been recommended to me. How on Earth did I not know about this flippin' channel?! KZbin, you failed me hard on this one.

[@absolutedoruiyaaa4736]

Watch your profanity

[@b.l.u.e.p.i.e]

Try the channel What if, they produces good vids about cosmos also.

[@Strype13]

@@absolutedoruiyaaa4736 Couldn't help it. Was way too excited.

[@Thesamurai1999]

I really don’t recommend this channel because of all the misinformation in this video.

[@Strype13]

@@ark8tct Thanks for the recommendation, ARK! Appreciate it, bud. Yeah, if any other astronomy geeks like myself are out there and haven't had a chance to check out the channels I've listed in my OP, please do so! They provide some top-notch content! Furthermore, if anybody knows any channels that aren't on my list... and probably should be... please, let me know so I can add them! Thanks all!

[@gishjalmr5628]

You said @2:01 that the lighter the star, the less time it will continue to burn. That is not correct as the heavier stars live shorter lives than lighter ones. Also @2:10 you said that the star sheds its outer layers and goes supernova, leaving a white dwarf. This is incorrect as white dwarves are the remnant of smaller star incapable of a supernova. Supernova remnants are either neutron stars or black holes.

[@harrylarkins1310]

It's someone using a bot as a voice, what did you expect?

[@gabbyn978]

Also, in order for it to become a *neutron star*, if it actually had 40 times the mass of our sun, it would have to shed roughly 90% of its matter before it ex/implodes, because only then the mass is low enough for that outcome. Everything that leaves a higher mass, would rather turn it into a stellar black hole. The Wikipedia entry however estimates that it is currently as heavy as twenty suns, which means it might already have lost at least half of its initial mass. They also have a pretty infrared picture of the star.

[@stxdude830]

@@harrylarkins1310 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@robbie8142]

It's a good thing that all we see in the universe is in the past. Can you imagine the panic if we got our measurement wrong of what is a safe distance from those super hot stars that have already gone BOOOM!

[@ArchangelExile]

Hottest star that we know of in the universe* Fixed that for you. I hate it when people speak in absolutes as if we know for sure that it's the hottest star in the entire universe, which contains at the very least, trillions of stars, is right here, in our own galaxy. It's like when people say that Stephenson 2-18 is the largest star in the entire universe or that TON 618 is the largest blackhole in the entire universe.

[@LPF7]

r/iamverysmart

[@stopanti-whitepropaganda6650]

@@LPF7 dont be ironic, he is right

[@LPF7]

@@stopanti-whitepropaganda6650 r/iamalsoverysmart

[@stopanti-whitepropaganda6650]

@@LPF7 stfu kid Reddit is worse than Twitter

[@LPF7]

@@stopanti-whitepropaganda6650 why u mad?

[@kimberlyperez8141]

I don't want to be "that person" but the hottest star in the *observable* universe would be more fitting

[@waynetemplar2183]

LOL, I'm glad that you were that person so that I didn't have to be

[@ChipsChallenge95]

They don’t even know for sure that it’s the hottest star in the observable universe

[@markb8468]

Also..... If it goes supernova it won't leave behind a white dwarf.

[@johhny6612]

Marry me

[@BillyTheKD]

"Observable universe" has nothing to do with our capacity of observation. Check for the correct definition.

[@Gigan--a]

0:00-0:15 is just a description of Arizona

[@venkatasagar492]

This is breath taking! 👌🏼

[@louisesmalling]

Best of. Tying WR objects to the simple circle of life in our cosmos. Repost. Update? You have done a fine job.

[@dylanbrassel]

Excellent video! Well done guys! Keep it up!

[@What-ei5nz]

2:12 Not sure if a Main Sequence star like our sun star goes supernova after the Red Giant phase. I think it expands, sheds its outer layers and becomes a white dwarf. A massive star that goes supernova will collapse inward on itself because it does not have any more fuel.

[@adamw8818]

I really like how you say your "Os" it's cool! Best space channel on here!

[@scottreed4448]

@2:05 - Fyi...a white dwarf is not the product of a supernova. White dwarves can be the progenitors of type 1a supernovae if in a close binary system and accretes enough mass to exceed the chandrasekhar limit.

[@SidIndian082]

Beautiful footage 🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@SharonD369]

Super quality upload as always 👌👌👌

[@bhuvaneshs.k638]

A small error 1:23 not chemical, Nuclear Reaction. Great video ❤️

[@zeom76]

I'm not a specialist. But I think white dwarfs don't come from stars going super nova. Very nice post, thanks.

[@MrEnjoivolcom1]

You indeed are correct, my fellow astronomy friend.

[@zeom76]

@@MrEnjoivolcom1 Thank you. 😊

[@SynKronik]

@@zeom76 you're absolutely incorrect

[@Itzchandan024]

This is an outstanding doc on the most blazing-hot star in the universe that's packed with incredible animation & brilliant narration 😍👍👌

[@Duncanate]

These visualizations are outstanding.

[@ps2.prodzz]

Yo shoutout to the cameraman.

[@matthewiles5714]

04:36 - 210,000 Kelvin is roughly the same as 209,727 °C and that is roughly 377,540 °F 06:45 - Wind speed of approximately 5000 kilometers per second wich is roughly 3,107 miles per second 08:10 - 200,000 Kelvin is roughly the same as 199,727°C which is roughly the same as 359,540°F

[@Rafaga777]

Great and interesting video. Thanks a lot for posting...

[@rarebird_82]

Still not as hot as the blast from my oven door when I check the pizza 🥵🔥

[@albertchehade9916]

😵 😲 😁 😂 😃 😄 😅

[@elvinv1110]

Man... I Gotta admit such visually beautiful clips in this video. I wanna make HD wallpaper out of it to set on my phone. 😍😍😍😍

[@Trolligi]

Cool! Wolf-Rayet stars have fascinated me for quite some time fyi, all WRs will become black holes because their initial mass is very high

[@christoforospl9482]

Amazing video. Excellent work!

[@philladdy7339]

I wonder if that's where alien's go for a holiday

[@ardi08]

Imagine if aliens out there feeding on pulsar star radiation 😳

[@philladdy7339]

@@ardi08 dyson sphere check it out

[@ardi08]

@@philladdy7339 What I meant is aliens living on planet which orbiting pulsar star

[@chrisstargazer5866]

Another gem! Thankyou kosmo

[@sim4cs]

Most amazing space animation I’ve ever seen ... deserves an Oscar 🤩

[@kevynhansyn2902]

Oscars don't mean squat. I don't want see the Cameramen knew to the Hollywood mov for a shammy award.

[@EighthRobin]

Great video and amazing graphics!

[@stevefox8605]

Superb video, fascinating. Thank you 👏🏻👍🏻

[@SpaceyFace141]

Nice vid. Thanks!!!

[@ChuckerA]

Kosmo the best I don't miss any of them

[@sanifard3393]

Best scientific chanell in you tube god bless you we've love you from great IRAN

[@aeMKei2850]

Great video! Great channel!🙏

[@blakena4907]

If the temperature of the surface of this star is ~200,000 K, then it's corona would be absolutely insane, and that's probably the understatement of the year.

[@RFS_Moon]

Its still the corrona what if the core

[@Rodayeboss]

And you all know that from looking at a beam of light millions of miles away...?

[@cityofjoy8830]

Superb presentation 👍

[@jupitorious7925]

Subscribed to this channel utterly fascinating... Thanks 👍

[@alexkang7360]

Good stuff man i subscribed few months ago

[@borisbeloudus2691]

Hmm… Wulf Rayet Stars. They have a short term red super giant phase mainly being a variable star. They usually produce magnetars or black holes because of the sheer mass alone. They mainly have a small iron core.

[@HesOneShotOMG]

Lets go I caught it in the first hour I absolutely love these docs

[@cosmic_gate476]

Which docs?

[@davecrupel2817]

So THIS is the supernova we are most likely to see! Nice!

[@hermesbandofficial8551]

Found a channel to binge for the month

[@hermesbandofficial8551]

@Jackie Price oh totally

[@JayCross]

"Hottest star in the universe"? or just hottest star measured so far?

[@Lintpop]

When heat isn't even heat anymore...laws of physics breaks down.

[@taquiupa]

It's kinda weird to observe and collect data from a star that may have already died in a supernova blast. We can always observe the past when it comes to the cosmo.

[@countfrankfritter]

Hello to you. When I saw the the description for this one I thought to myself ( Hello I better get the Sun factor and Shades ready.) However I very quickly realised That Basking in the noon day Sun would be a very bad Idea. 200.000 Degrees Hotter is just Staggering!!! needless to say I won't be going on vacation to WR 102 any time soon. Fantastic Video though. : )

[@squeaksvids5886]

One huge error. A supernova does not create a White Dwarf, a supernova create Neutron Stars.

[@jordansmith6600]

It can create White dwarfs, neutron stars and black holes. You’re welcome friend 😊 depending on its Mass before going supernova

[@stereoheart.sachii]

I'll sub. Out of all the similar channels I fw this already

[@reidsimonson]

In an endless universe they have somehow already found the hottest star. Crazy, what are the odds of 1 in infinity.

[@lunamaria1048]

Main sequence stars do not go supernova after expanding into a red giant.. The simply die off quietly, shedding their shells of gases, leaving behind the white dwarf core.. Cosmologist's say they "die in a wimper.. Not a bang" Excellent video, either wat!!.. You have a new subscriber in me!! :)

[@Faint366]

Nice frostpunk music in the background

[@zpetar]

1:20 Chemical reactions cannot fuse two atoms together to produce heavier elements.

[@Kanitoxx]

Yeah, they have this kind of errors several times through the video. I mean, there is super accurate things too, but they fail in some basic things hahaha

[@nandakumarcheiro]

This may be due to merger of electron and positron forming matter and antimatter merging reactions producing higher energies.

[@Kanitoxx]

@@nandakumarcheiro that's still a nuclear reaction

[@ahmedsenussi8232]

WOW powerful stuff please keep on making new videos

[@zion7832]

Remarkable video. Respect from Pakistan.

[@jamesbarisitz4794]

My brain loses the concept after a kajillion degrees Kelvin. ✌

[@chickey333]

My brain can handle up to around kajillion and three... then it goes super nova and dies off as a red dwarf.

[@jamesbarisitz4794]

@@chickey333 Hey, you are three up on me Chickey!

[@chickey333]

Actually I don't know just how many a kajillion really is but I figure it's a number that starts with a one and ends with a whole bunch of zeros. I'm guessing the scientists who try calculating the size of the universe would admit the same thing.

[@navret1707]

Astronomical distances fascinate me. Looking out into the universe we do not see what is, we see what was. To me, it gives a new definition to the word “is”. (Maybe Bill Clinton was right after all: It depends on your definition of “is”.)

[@mattmcmillan3573]

Love the frostpunk theme. 11 bit ftw!

[@vanesa9346]

*Gee camera man is immortal*

[@NoEgg4u]

@0:32 "...WR102 is the hottest star in the universe" That line speaks volumes about the lack of credibility of our host. 1) No one knows how many stars are in our galaxy, and there are probably 200,000,000,000 to 400,000,000,000 stars in our galaxy. And our host asserts that he knows which star is the hottest, when there are countless stars that are nearly 100,000 light years distance from us (that's 587,849,956,300,000,000 miles away). 2) Our observable universe has so many galaxies, that scientists are all over the map, guessing at how many galaxies exist -- but it is in the trillions, or perhaps quadrillions. And each galaxy has over 100,000,000 stars for the smallest known galaxies, and over 10,000,000,000,000 stars for the largest known galaxies. And our host asserts that he knows which star is the hottest, when there are countless galaxies that are nearly 14,000,000,000 light years away from us (that's 82,298,993,881,999,995,000,000 miles from us). 3) There are more galaxies in the observable universe than there are grains of sand on our planet. And our host asserts that he knows which star is the hottest, when there are galaxies so far away, that the Hubble telescope needs to collect light, for weeks, from completely black sections of space, in order to create an image of over 10,000 galaxies from a single dark patch of space. And every one of the countless galaxies has millions and more likely billions of stars. So our host's claim of knowing the hottest star in the universe, is akin to laying claim to knowing the answer to the physics within a black hole, and from where human life on Earth derived.

[@J_gumbainia]

So that's why everyday is very hot, a giant star near to our solar system is very hot all day.

[@Itzchandan024]

No star in the universe is as fiery as WR 102!! That's unbelievable 😮🔥

[@InfiniteUniverse88]

Wikipedia says that WR102 is only 16 solar masses. There also appears to be a nebula forming prior to the star going supernova.

[@phoenixskeptic5191]

WR102 is the hottest star we know of... There, fixed it for you.

[@damanybrown5036]

Thank you!

[@detsir4695]

yo what the hell you guys deserve a million subs and not 100 k, keep going ur amazing

[@Thesamurai1999]

There’s a bunch of misinformation in this video tho.

[@kingmasterlord]

Wriok, a Young Adult red dragon who's fire breath is nonetheless considered at least equal to an Ancient's powerful breath weapon.

[@Roachomane]

So we really out there traveling in alien ships learning this ish?

[@hakunamatata4322]

Please say "The hottest star we know" rather than " Hottest star in the universe".

[@barrymak421]

Wait, I thought a super nova does not produce a white dwarf. I though a supernova destroys everything, unless the star is a certain size where it then creates a neutron star. I thought to get a white dwarf a planetary nebula was created, so no explosion.

[@jonathanturek5846]

Stars like our sun not big enough to go super nova will end its post life as white dwarf . yes he got a mistake. After supernova u cAn have a nutron star magnetar or more than likely a blk hole .. But not a white dwarf

[@AndryC4]

nothing hotter than my burger that was inside 1 Hour and 30 mins in a microwave

[@diGritz1]

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding but around the 2:00 mark it says the red giant sheds it's layers and goes supernova and turns into a white dwarf. Only main sequence stars around 8 times the mass of our sun will create a core collapse supernova and they leave behind either a neutron star or black hole not a white dwarf. The only relationship between white dwarfs and supernovas are from white dwarfs feeding off a companion star, a type 1A supernova.

[@mastershake8018]

The mashed potatoes I'm eating are probably as rare as that star.

[@mlpreiss]

The circle of (cosmological) life.

[@HappyRescues]

Hottest in the entire universe? That's a bold statement considering we dont even know how big the universe really is in the first place.

[@bexrayspex]

He says ‘the hottest star in the studied universe’ not the entire universe

[@davidcasci]

1:01 FOUR hydrogen Atoms (two Deuterium Atoms) form a Helium atom

[@teamupleft7097]

Two hydrogen atoms are not equal to one deuterium atom. Yes they have the total number of nucleons but that does not make them the same and the fusion of hydrogen into helium is a completely different process from the fusion of deuterium into helium

[@adamhughes4442]

The hottest star in the "studied " universe. Not the entire universe. Nobody knows whats beyond the point of observable!

[@annnottingham2270]

There's always Eta Carinae, ready to go at any moment.

[@davidripley2916]

Wolf-Rayets are seriously bad news ( for unfortunate locals). BLAMMO! ✨

[@HappyRescues]

Can a black hole have a temperature? Since particles are compressed into a singularity and they no longer have room to vibrate... wouldnt that mean the temperature of a blackhole is absolute zero? or is temperature not even a concept at that point?

[@Raptor828]

Black Holes have a temperature. But that temperature is lower than the background Temperature of the Universe, so they cant radiate any heat. Far in the Future, when the Universe has cooled down enough, Black holes will start to evaporate. Look up Hawking Radiation if you want to know more.

[@Thesamurai1999]

@@Raptor828 Why would it be lower, the accretion disks are usually millions of degrees.

[@Raptor828]

@@Thesamurai1999 the accretion disk, yes. The black Holes themselves are absurdly cold.

[@acb9896]

Hottest star yet recorded. We have an observable and an unobserved universe so there's no accuracy in calling anything the hottest, biggest, furthest away etc. in the universe.

[@illusion1277]

This is summer for the universe.

[@razzikhan1980]

On this channel whenever video is uploaded there is no way to left the video without watching. Awesome 👌 video, superb channel.

[@carbon_no6]

Our Sun is a star in the mass range that will likely produce a White Dwarf. I say likely, because I’m not one that studies this for a career and rely on what others tell me. If a star has round 8-20+ solar masses that out it in the range of going supernova and an item left behind of greater than a mass 1.4x that of our Sun will condense down into a Neutron Star. This mass can be around a max of 2.8x solar masses before it is just too much mass concentrated in such a small volume that over this limit will result in a Black Hole. There is thought to be a type of supernova involving a White Dwarf known as a Type 1-A Supernova. This is where a White Dwarf orbits another star and is gravitationally drawing the material from the binary star orbiting it. This builds up until the point where enough material causes an explosion of sorts. This is known as a “standard-candle” that is used to accurately gauge the distance from different points in space. As the luminosity of these types of nova are remarkably similar, if not identical it allows for consistency in measuring. Without any surrounding material to pull from a White Dwarf will just be.

[@Thesamurai1999]

Correct

[@celestialwrath]

Red Giants don't go supernova, and "in the universe" is a bold and ignorant claim to make. You were doing so well too.

[@richardforee1342]

Aloha! Are Arcturus and Betelguese Red Giants?

[@richardforee1342]

Wait! Not Arcturus, Antares ... ooops!

[@richardforee1342]

Antares.

[@Thesamurai1999]

@@richardforee1342Betelgues is a supergiant. Arcturus is a red giant. Antares is two stars, one is a red supergiant (the brightest) while the other is a really hot main sequence star which will eventually become a supergiant.

[@CB-nf8ez]

"chill TF out bruh" "Nah"

[@rajkumar-sj5gf]

வணக்கம் This is how I think our universe was born 👍💗

[@bernardedwards8461]

How do you know it's the hottest in the universe? The universe is an unimaginably vast place, and we have visually explored only a tiny part of it.

[@srinitaaigaura]

As with any scientific discovery, always add the word now.

[@williamniland761]

110000 light years away. Stop it. Nice guess.