YES! Finally someone who uses parenthesis! So many people leave them out. As a mathematician, I love that you used parenthesis when you wrote trig. Even text books annoyingly will write sina+b. Is this: 1. sin(a)+b or 2. sin(a+b) Which is it? Plus, trig (and logs) are functions. As such, they should have functional parenthesis as found in f(x).
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you appreciate the parenthesis
@cyberbrunk2 жыл бұрын
Engineerings are absolutely awful about that sometimes. I've had professors who write "sin ab" and "sin(a)*b" interchangeably
@pianoman162 жыл бұрын
@@cyberbrunk or maybe (sin a) * b.
@jannegrey5932 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Consistency and clarity are important. Especially since there are so many trig identities to remember that missing parenthesis will shift you from one to the other.
@ami4432 жыл бұрын
@@cyberbrunk engineers use () exactly like mathematicians do because they already *are* mathematicians but for real stuff.
@Madsy94 жыл бұрын
Your in-depth physics history lessons are just incredible. Thank you for your hard work.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@John14-6...3 жыл бұрын
@@PhysicsExplainedVideos c ccx
@S_C_ Жыл бұрын
It’s cool but not 100% accurate. Very much a byproduct of Eurocentric education. Everything ancient didn’t begin in “ancient” Greece. He always implies that.
@perdedor357110 ай бұрын
@@PhysicsExplainedVideosI agree, it's very well done. Would you mind if I used a bit of it for my class?
@sheastewart7608 Жыл бұрын
As a chemist trying to refresh my understanding of quantum physics to a degree, these videos are invaluable. Thank you for these
@sadovniksocratus1375 Жыл бұрын
Quantum Light (h) is a dualistic quantum particle that in the cosmic vacuum can fly at a constant speed (c=1). In this movement, light uses its linear spin and it does not produce electromagnetic waves. Light behaves like a corpuscular. But light can behave like a wave if it uses its angular rotation (the torque required to accelerate angularly around the axis of rotation). In this situation, the speed of the light is faster than the constant. The speed is c>1. This situation is explained by Lorentz transformations. The problem is that we do not know the geometric shape of the light quantum.
@burnsmclean13963 жыл бұрын
I teach a Year 12 Physics class in NSW, Australia and I have just recommended that all of my students watch this video in order to clarify their understanding of one of the modules in this course. Your integration of mathematical content is second-to-none! Well done!
@schmetterling44773 жыл бұрын
Just make sure that you explain to your students that what they are watching here is not proper physics but the science history of a false ontology similar to the phlogiston that is still around, even though we know that it's not correct.
@sheastewart7608 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 I'm really unsure what you mean by this comment. This video pretty much only covers well accepted physical theories.
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
@@sheastewart7608 Wave particle duality is not a physical theory. It's simple bullshit. As MIT's Allan Adams points out: "10^23 electrons don't make waves, they make cheese.". Every bit of matter and radiation in the universe follows the laws of quantum mechanics. There is a near endless amount of variety in those phenomena. What you will never see are particles (I hope you know what a particle is in physics) and waves.
@sheastewart7608 Жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 are you any sort of scientist yourself?
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
@@sheastewart7608 Yes, but why does it matter that I am a physicist? That still doesn't help you with your problem: you aren't smart enough to outgrow a trivial false dichotomy fallacy.
@rdiznfriends3 жыл бұрын
this channel is a hidden gem. please keep making videos, they are tremendous.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@mickeymoose6364 жыл бұрын
You’re the best physics explainer on youtube
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Very kind of you to say, thanks for the feedback
3 жыл бұрын
No, Theoria Apophasis is!
@barrycoad20803 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/q5SZdHqIn9iKjZI
@toddmarshall75733 жыл бұрын
@@frankdimeglio8216 What non-sense. Saying in all the permutations you can think of doesn't change that.
@happyrogue71463 жыл бұрын
the knowledge i have gathered in this 43 minute video on particle duality is more than that i acquired in high school.
@PhilipePXF2 жыл бұрын
I'm late for this party, I know. but as a Chemist that loves Physics, and has been taking way more Physics' classes than needed, it's such a happy and heartwarming thing to see a video that combines both of my favorite areas of science being release on my birthday!!
@davinmercier28954 жыл бұрын
This is the 3Blue1Brown of physics
@vishnupriyanmurugan97183 жыл бұрын
You are correct band he is soooooooper coooool
@tetbundy56833 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Just much more serious in tone i think
@nupeldadbaker95263 жыл бұрын
Indeed. Same as Grant does in 3Blue1Brown, this channel explains the most complex material in the most understandable way. It should be mandatory for every graduate textbook writer to watch this channel as they demonstrate great talent to turn simple subjects to horribly intimidating (Somehow I think they do that intentionally though)
@dmeemd77873 жыл бұрын
@DonaldJ 😁
@dmeemd77873 жыл бұрын
They should do some sort of collab 4 videos, just not in the cliche sense.. Grant could REALLY help break down the math and yeah, that would be amazing!!
@cannettedebiere3 жыл бұрын
This is the exact level of physics and math I can understand (electronic engineer speaking). Thank you for making this mess so much clearer !
@Mayank-mf7xr2 жыл бұрын
43 minutes well spent. This the quality content that is meant to be on KZbin.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Mayank-mf7xr2 жыл бұрын
@@PhysicsExplainedVideos Thank you for making such masterpieces. Hardwork that goes behind these works shows.
@stevecraig20604 жыл бұрын
So glad that you have posted a new video! I have been checking every week for the last month in the hope that you had not disappeared! Please keep the videos coming :-)
@PhysicsExplainedVideos4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, and don't worry, more to come
@alimmaqsa2 жыл бұрын
This channel is one of the KZbin hidden treasure.
@ildossi79344 жыл бұрын
awsome videos and yuo have a special gift in the way you explain the subjects. I regret my English is not good enough to express how much I apprciate your work. thanks for keeping uploading
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Wow, thank you!
@JamesThompson-xn2jv2 жыл бұрын
As someone who studies on their own simply for the love of it; you're amazing. You explain things well, in a language that is simple to understand. Fantastic video!!
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Also completely wrong. There are no particles and many quanta don't make waves. They make cheese. And tungsten metal cubes. And a copy of "Gone with the Wind". And an infinity of other solids, liquids, gases, plasmas etc.. ;-)
@ps2003064 жыл бұрын
Great video. Lovely mix of science and history which I've always thought is necessary to bring the subject alive.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@L2p22 жыл бұрын
I like your way of presenting the historical evolution of an idea. Its brings out the process involved in doing physics.
@lukostello3 жыл бұрын
I frequently put this on as a bedtime story hoping I'll gain understanding of it in my sleep
@schmetterling44773 жыл бұрын
That's like hoping that you will gain an understanding about Little Red Riding Hood.
@richardcoppin53323 жыл бұрын
This is at exactly the level of detail I'm looking for. Most science channels once found are presented either like a PhD in physics where it's too detailed to follow, or like a museum tour on the history of science which is interesting but mostly useless.
@mahadlodhi4 жыл бұрын
Ughhh 43 minutes well spent, really filled with gratitude towards you for making such vids
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure, glad you enjoyed it
@ShadowZZZ4 жыл бұрын
This video reminds me of the videos series by King Crocoduck called "Quantum Theory Made Easy". In it, he presents the history and development of quantum mechanics, explaining the famous physicists' contributions on the way and touching upon the wave-particle duality of light and electrons. The only difference is that he didn't hold his promise to continue with the series, where the next topic would have been on the Schrödinger wave function. I have great hopes that you do
@PhysicsExplainedVideos4 жыл бұрын
Well, the pressure is on...I will hopefully not disappoint
@ShadowZZZ4 жыл бұрын
@@PhysicsExplainedVideos As someone who studies physics myself, I really love and admire your videos. It helps bridge the gap between facts you hear from popular science and hard scientific literature, in an easy to access and moderate to understand way. I just hope your channel grows more, because I watched all your current videos with attention and think they're gems.
@cylar1592 жыл бұрын
@@PhysicsExplainedVideos actually, we all still hope, that you will try somewhen go back to Schrödinger equation. Understanding of it's nature and beauty during my PHD course made me fan of quantum mechanics.
@stevenwonder75854 жыл бұрын
This channel is a physicist treasure trove. The best physics educator on this platform. I fell in love with physics due to my fascination with the nature of light; this video, with its masterful methods of instruction and display of ideas and formulae takes me back to that initial moment of wonder and joy. I can't thank you enough!!
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind feedback, much appreciated
@adamboyd3484 жыл бұрын
What a huge amount of effort in a single video, thank you very much for uploading these, it’s truly great to be taken back through the derivations I brushed over during my undergraduate learning, and approach these topics from your unique perspective. Thanks!
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you very much for the kind feedback
@TheZenytram4 жыл бұрын
Best introduction to QM in the whole internet
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Vey kind of you to say
@yknx43 жыл бұрын
I was supposed to go to sleep 3 hours ago. Somehow I'm about to watch just one last before sleep. This is addictive
@AnirudhGiri4 жыл бұрын
45 minutes well spent :) Excellent video. Keep up the amazing work!
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@midnightrider1100 Жыл бұрын
Some of these videos the guys talk so fast your brain can't keep up. This speaker uses great pacing and pauses along with the diagrams conducive to learning. Enjoyed this video.
@supreetsahu19644 жыл бұрын
So glad to see you back brother! I was starting to get worried :P you are the best science channel on this site btw, you always deliver really detailed and very interesting content
@PhysicsExplainedVideos4 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated! Thanks for the kind words
@Il0vebagels692 жыл бұрын
I put your videos on to fall asleep to. Not because they’re boring, I put them on audio only and imagine everything you’re saying and it helps me fall asleep so much faster. Thank you for these videos
@ElVerdaderoAbejorro2 жыл бұрын
My man, you are going to reach a million subscribers easily... Best physics channel on KZbin hands down. You are the only one that actually explain things in detail and with math, without trying to dumb things down or make everything quick for the short attention span kids to be happy. Keep it up!!!
@Hadi-zw9mb4 жыл бұрын
Great and neat explanation, thank you. Today is also Schroedinger's birthday.
@TheFerdi2654 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video! It's always a blast watching you take us on an adventure through the history of physics. The historical context often makes it much easier for me to remember what is what, and why it is that way.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback!
@sheiphanshaijan12494 жыл бұрын
Hey man. Amazing video. Always waiting for your videos. Thanks. You take me to a journey I can't forget.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words, much appreciated
@timvw013 жыл бұрын
Very high quality. Really love the historic story behind our knowledge of physics. Thanks. Light is fascinating.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Paul-fn2wb4 жыл бұрын
Wow, I've been waiting for your new video! Thank you for your work, man.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo56662 жыл бұрын
I have to admit that this channel is so fantastic, you leave me with no words, please continue making videos in this kind of style, they take things to another level of depth.
@sadovniksocratus1375 Жыл бұрын
Quantum Light (h) is a dualistic quantum particle that in the cosmic vacuum can fly at a constant speed (c=1). In this movement, light uses its linear spin and it does not produce electromagnetic waves. Light behaves like a corpuscular. But light can behave like a wave if it uses its angular rotation (the torque required to accelerate angularly around the axis of rotation). In this situation, the speed of the light is faster than the constant. The speed is c>1. This situation is explained by Lorentz transformations. The problem is that we do not know the geometric shape of the light quantum.
@sombal19994 жыл бұрын
Ending quote gave me chills
@Nitram21uk213 жыл бұрын
If Scott Manley posted this it would have 25M views......Great Vid my friend....deserves more respect...imo
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Cheers for the encouragement and feedback!
@jamesam0034 жыл бұрын
This is so detailed and awesome! Amazing video brother. Thank you
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@imaseeker1003 жыл бұрын
I've watched dozens of lectures and videos relating to this principle and this one was just fabulous in every way
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@renzostefanmp79373 жыл бұрын
As a physics student, I can say the best videos on these themes are to be found in this channel. Thank you for such a great work!
@obst30854 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, with your video you have done a great job (just like all the other ones you made!), also looking forward to that Schrödinger video. For most videos, I knew the basic results, but never the intensity of context and collaboration which went into making those discoveries possible, and I think that's one of the most unique things your channel highlights.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@AZ-vy4gl3 жыл бұрын
I feel like I am there as the researcher making each discovery in history when I listen to this channel. Stellar work.
@dosomething34 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@stevenschilizzi4104 Жыл бұрын
This is truly a stupendous explanation, the best I’ve ever come across yet. No other presentation made it so clear that the crux of the probabilistic (Born) interpretation of the electron’s wave function originates in the relationship between the intensity of (any) wave and the square of its amplitude. If one doesn’t know that (from classical physics) the whole thing remains somewhat mysterious. That “analogy” was the theoretical leap in De Broglie’s mind that really needed highlighting, and you do just that. No wonder that Einstein himself was awed by De Broglie’s insight. It was then a matter of dotting the i’s and crossing thet’s for Max Born to add, almost as a post-scriptum: Oh and by the way the square of the amplitude of the quantum wavefunction Psi represents the probability of finding the particle if we look for it. Thanks for this very pedagogical and enlightening exposition. All teachers of physics and the students they teach will be able to benefit from it.
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
In other words, you don't know shit about quantum mechanics. ;-)
@jocelbartolay48614 жыл бұрын
It made me recall Quantum Theory Made Easy by King Crocoduck. The voice, as well as the sentence construction, are really similar. It's great I have subscribed to you. Your videos are surely great. Keep up the good work!
@drakeh38393 жыл бұрын
Your videos are on a different level dude. So informative yet so clear and digestible
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that! Thanks for the feedback
@jayyadav16102 жыл бұрын
Thank you vey much,this is probably the most beautiful video that ive seen on youtube ever probably,i just realised how connected everything was due to the historical aspect you present in this video.Everything now is more clear than ever and now i hope to study everything more deeply with a better understanding.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@EannaButler3 жыл бұрын
Agree with all the positive comments. Discovered your channel earlier this week. Easiest subscription from me for a long while...
@DiwasTimilsina3 жыл бұрын
dude, your ability to create these visuals to exactly show what you are talking about is remarkable! Love your videos, thanks for making them!
@zlatanibrahimovic83294 жыл бұрын
Underrated af
@DimitrisGerakaris9 ай бұрын
I feel like when QM is taught nowadays there's nowhere near enough emphasis given to how we came up with it in the first place. Not by saying "this guy studied that other guy's notes and they all magically had the answer" but by presenting the whole series of discoveries since we've started looking, step by step, just like this video does
@schmetterling44778 ай бұрын
That's science history and not science. What that does for you is to reinforce mistakes of other people that were caused by a lack of evidence at that time in your mind. Not a good way of learning actual physics. You can only learn physics properly by starting with the latest set of evidence and then you don't have to go down some of the rabbit holes of the past.
@vm-bz1cd3 жыл бұрын
You are awesome! I wish I had had you as my physics teacher 40 years ago... i now realize what little I “learnt” then...
@MarceloRobertoJimenez4 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Congratulations for your videos!
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@ajj42073 жыл бұрын
You did an AWESOME Job, I enjoyed this very MUCH. Very cool. Learned so much finer details in this subject. Thank you, keep up the positive vibrations.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, will do!
@matarnold50044 жыл бұрын
These videos are really excellent, and clearly a lot of effort goes into them. I hope you are able to continue, I'm looking forward to it!
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them! Thanks for the feedback
@badrinair3 жыл бұрын
I am going to share this channel as much as I can .
@ricardasist4 жыл бұрын
Great learning material
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@vyor88373 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@MrZWolfy3 жыл бұрын
Just found your videos and your laid back yet concise storytelling helps a lot. Really looking forward to your take on the Schrödinger equation. Thanks for refreshing and consolidating QM knowledge! And happy new year! :D
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated
@surajgupta-me7zl4 жыл бұрын
Very comprehensive vedio ..I loveed it
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it
@nithinhm133 жыл бұрын
A beautifully presented video. I loved this. ❤️ Your way of blending history and science with neat derivations wherever appropriate makes this truly a gem of a video. In my head, I could see jigsaw pieces neatly falling into place. The idea that the interpretation of the debroglie wavelength lead to the introduction of quantum mechanics blew me away; an absolute "aha" moment!! 🤩 I'm so thrilled that I finally understand what's the motivation behind the introduction of the wavefunction! Thank you so much for this brilliant video. 🥰 Please do keep making more of these. 😊🤝
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your kind words, much appreciated
@snowrider99953 жыл бұрын
I am about to complete my master's, I must say your videos are an easy way for me to revise the essential history of physics. I always love how you mention all the steps and leave nothing to the readers. If you were to become a physicist(if you aren't yet) you will be a really good one. I wish to talk to you, can I personally talk to you?
@SuperFluidFerroFluid2 жыл бұрын
I needed this 12 years ago.. Perhaps then i wouldnt have quit school so incredibly dissapointed.
@jeremykeetch72136 ай бұрын
An incredible summary of the progression of our understanding of light. Your videos are great, and I hope you make more.
@cirdiam18004 жыл бұрын
Very well done!!
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@ernieengineer34623 жыл бұрын
You’re a born teacher. I also enjoy your Cool Worlds channel. Thanks for sharing your passion with the rest of us.
@graxxor5 ай бұрын
And this my friends show just how Metal Newton was. what an absolute mental UNIT! Unparalleled in modern times.
@Raging.Geekazoid3 жыл бұрын
The wave-particle duality is an attempt to shoehorn the phenomenon of matter waves into the classical mindset of solid objects. Physicists are unable to accept that there's no such thing as particles, so they insist that field disturbances somehow are particles or have particle-like properties when they interact with each other. A more natural interpretation of the data would be that quantization is a property of whatever mechanism underlies interactions among fields, not of the fields themselves. In other words, matter is a collection of spin waves in the vacuum and is quantized only indirectly, through localized interactions.
@addy74643 жыл бұрын
One of the best physics channels on youtube..... Thanks for all your help.
@mpicos1003 жыл бұрын
the Schrödinger quote if great. Fantastic video (I am watching all of them!)
@wayneyadams2 жыл бұрын
1:36 The idea that a person's eye produces light is easily disproven every time one enters ad dark room, and it remains dark. Pythagoras should have stuck with what he did best, mathematics. 2:22 Unfortunately for Lucretius, shadows don't have sharp edges, due to a phenomenon we call diffraction. 6:50 Huygen's Wavefront Theory suffers from a fatal flaw. There are numerous interactions, so why does one set take precedence over the others. In other words, one could draw wavefronts is many different directions, 28:00 The electron orbitals are simply three -dimensional harmonic waves. Excellent historical narrative told in a logical, clear, and concise manner. If I were not retired from teaching, I would show this video in my classes.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
Huygens is an approximation, so is the level of homogeneous, isotropic (or in case of bi-refringence polarization dependent) Maxwell optics that we are teaching at the university level. Are you complaining that we aren't throwing thousand page textbooks on the most general case of classical light-matter interaction at high school students???? Why? Do all students in high school need to learn how to write a CGI rendering engine that can correctly render a pearl? What for? So they will learn to hate science even more than they already do? Electron orbitals are not "simple three-dimensional harmonic waves". You may want to talk to a fellow retired chemistry teacher about that. If his students write that sentence in a test, he would have to fail them. :-)
@ericreiter13 жыл бұрын
You did a decent job as far as what we see in our textbooks. The math and model of Quantum Mechanics (QM) is: a probability wave predicts a particle-like event. There is a problem with that. A variant of the double-slit experiment is the beam-split coincidence experiment. In the language of QM and photons, a photon will go one way or another, but not both ways, at a beam splitter. This has been done with visible light and x-rays, seemingly in support of QM. This is the weirdness of QM. What would eliminate the other path? You can see in my published works that quantum physicists are either looking at noise or are doing tricks with polarized beam-splitters. With much work, I performed that beam-split test many times, but in a way no one previously attempted: with gamma-rays and alpha-rays (helium)... hundreds of times and ways. When I compare coincident detection rates with the chance coincident rate, I substantially exceed chance. QM predicts chance would not be exceeded for this test. This flaw of QM is my discovery. There is a way to re-interpret past experiments to see how an accumulation effect and a wave model is at play. For example, people should know that Compton also had a wave model to explain his effect. The conclusion is that a threshold effect can replace quantization. The weirdness disappears. All the details of my experiments and theory are at www.unquantum.net
@hgtrad7655 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant work, I have followed many of your videos and having a srong knowledge in electromagnetics, Maxwell, Stokes, Poisson divergence, gradient, vector potential et al, I could understand 100% of your expose on Schrodinger and Heisenberg equations. Remarkable way of leading the explanation you never loose sight of the relevant points although there are plenty of details. Thank you for your great work!!
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
So you know how to solve Maxwell's equations? Please show. ;-)
@dwaynegardner23653 жыл бұрын
I’m just catching this video now. I wish I’d discovered it earlier. It’s excellent. Thank you.
@ableone78553 жыл бұрын
A great presentation. One of the finest narration and explanation techniques. Thanks from the USA. Looking forward for more!
@dangerousness213 жыл бұрын
Love it! I teach high-school IB physics - I can’t wait to recommend you to all my students a colleagues. I’d love to see a series on quantum mechanics, my old text books don’t quite cut it anymore after watching your videos.
@bobaldo23393 жыл бұрын
Wave/particle duality reminds me of a statement found in a Buddhist philosophical context: "The very sameness is the very difference".
@nmarbletoe82102 жыл бұрын
emptiness is form, form is emptiness
@saugatmazumdar19013 жыл бұрын
I am 16 years old and seriously i understood all of this quite well, excellent explanation, do you think you can do a video on string theory if possible? And please keep uploading, best content!
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, glad you managed to follow along! Yes, string theory is on my list!
This is exactly what I was looking for..amazingly well documented and explained chronologically... THANKS 🎉🎉🎉
@schmetterling447710 ай бұрын
It's just too bad that it's wrong. ;-)
@dankuchar68214 ай бұрын
I enjoy your in-depth content. Please make more!
@tarikavdovic92674 жыл бұрын
Finally new one
@gustavbw3 жыл бұрын
Pythagoras got Raytracing enabled
@General12th2 жыл бұрын
1:50 It almost sounded like you said "Other Greek philosophers, most notably Euclid and Ptolemy, used *radar guns* quite successfully to show..." and yeah, having those back then would probably have made understanding light a little easier!
@pixxelwizzard3 жыл бұрын
I was mostly able to keep up until Einstein showed up. After that I found it harder and harder to understand what was going on and after my eyes glassed over I had to give up. Seems like a fantastic explanation, it's just not meant for plebs like me, I think.
@roblouw13443 жыл бұрын
Your lectures never cease to amaze me!
@yashen123453 жыл бұрын
youve earned my sub, i wish bbc/netflix gave u your own documentary series
@joeblowgoes Жыл бұрын
Physics and a history lesson, great way to teach it
@schmetterling4477 Жыл бұрын
The history of wave particle duality ends around the early 1930s. Everything thereafter is merely ignorant people repeating a falsehood because they don't know better.
@SpectatorAlius3 жыл бұрын
It does not take 43 minutes to dispense with the historical error of "wave particle duality". Rather, as the legendary Soviet physics educator Kompaneets said, photons are particles, but it is their *dynamics* that are wave-like. Wonderfully, this one sentence is enough to clear up a lot of confusion when trying to solve physics problems involving light. Feynman, great educator that he was, did not quite put it as memorably and succinctly, but after reading his classic www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/III_01.html several times, I am convinced he was in complete agreement with Kompaneets.
@m.y.hossain2541 Жыл бұрын
How should i put it? This vedio is awesome. All theory explained in one vedio and it maintains the proper flow. 👌
@rtleitao783 жыл бұрын
This is incredibly well explained
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@treborsirrah79163 жыл бұрын
Thomas Young created that slit experiment over 200 years ago to solve the wave particle debate and here we are today still not sure what light is ,wave or particle,he is one of my favorites , i read in a book about light,it said the thought himself to read at age 2
@MrAlasoft3 жыл бұрын
Excellent ! .. funny .. clear and very very educational ! Congrats !
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@eviebrody3 жыл бұрын
I love your videos so much - they’re so calming and are one of my favorite things to fall asleep to, as well as obv being super well put-together and informative :]
@enderflair12223 жыл бұрын
If only I had found this video earlier, physics exam tomorrow =(
@eternalblue46603 жыл бұрын
Very interesting and informative. Thank you for the in-depth video 😊
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@GalileosTelescope4 жыл бұрын
Hi, your videos are great! I'm always looking forward to more. I was wondering if you have any advice on how to get people interested in physics to know about your channel? I noticed your channel is fairly new, but you managed to get good viewership quickly. I just started a physics channel too, but I don't really know how to get people who might be interested to know about it. Thanks, and keep up the good work!
@mdb12393 жыл бұрын
Here is the SIMPLEST of experiments (double slit). In my view, so far quantum mechanics does not fully explain what is happening. I think we as humans are missing what is really going on.
@calamariaxo3 жыл бұрын
So damn good. Can't wait for more.
@PhysicsExplainedVideos3 жыл бұрын
Cheers for the feedback, much appreciated
@anter1763 жыл бұрын
Pythagoras came up with the idea that's ultimately how raytracing in computer graphics works? As some context, usually when raytracing in CG the rays that simulate the light goes backwards, from the view or camera, hitting surfaces, reflecting, and tracing to the light sources before all the contributing factors combine to set the colour of the corresponding pixel for that ray