I fly a three engine Falcon. I used to fly Hawkers and Gulfstreams. They all have their pros and cons. The Falcon flies the nicest and has excellent runway performance but that giant empennage makes them a bit of a handful in a gusty crosswind, especially with the long, low wing. Fun fact: The 900 uses the 50's wing.
@jdean21318 ай бұрын
Very Cool!
@toodlepop7 ай бұрын
i have long thought the falcon 50 (including the EX) was one of the prettiest planes, even among other business jets.
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Master. Gef fky airbus a380
@BGTech18 ай бұрын
Falcon trijets are such elegant aircraft
@jonathanrobinson75738 ай бұрын
My dad worked in corporate aviation with Falcons, Lears, Citations, Challengers, and Gulfstreams. A lot of the owners and pilots who have to regularly fly over the big oceans due appreciate the 3rd engine despite some of the downsides such as maintaining an “extra” engine.
@DrVictorVasconcelos8 ай бұрын
I suppose that's one of the better downsides when you're flying over the ocean.
@parimal75288 ай бұрын
Yet it was more fuel efficient than 2 engine jets.
@Chris_at_Home8 ай бұрын
I worked for a large communications company and the 3 top people in that company came to my worksite in the Arctic. I asked the CEO about all 3 of them being on the plane together and he told me they only fly together if they were in a 3 engine jet. The Falcon had about the same footprint of a 737 but with a narrower fuselage. My first thought was most accidents happen during takeoff and landing and the number of engines doesn’t make a difference.
@minhpham-yh9qn8 ай бұрын
@@Chris_at_Homethe validity of that statement just nulls out the other ones. I was told most accident happen at take off and landing so most people with multi engine just slam into the crash site faster
@clownhands8 ай бұрын
A catastrophic failure of engine 3 can disable both hydraulic systems and short both electrical buses. Modern dual engine planes are more resilient.
@adityasanthanam19458 ай бұрын
I am glad to have had the opportunity to tour a Falcon 900. Specifically, one of the Falcon Response jets. What a beautiful and comfortable plane. It makes me glad that trijets are still alive. They are such graceful planes.
@davidcheung85958 ай бұрын
Did you ever have any opportunities to tour other well-known competitors?
@adityasanthanam19458 ай бұрын
@@davidcheung8595 No, sadly. I just happened to meet the pilot, who gave me a tour of the plane.
@johnwambe55778 ай бұрын
@@davidcheung8595 What other private jets would you recommend compared to the Falcon 10X?
@justforever967 ай бұрын
It's not a 727 but it's pretty nice. A mini 727.
@ElectricUAM8 ай бұрын
I just love them all around, from specs to design, flying characteristics to range, efficiency and how pilots love to fly them, and so much more. They are still my favorite airplanes, 900LX and 8X.
@Mercury03695 ай бұрын
I've never heard of one of these Falcon's ever crashing, so it must be a winner !
@Msoja8Ай бұрын
Love the Dassault aircraft and will own an 8X in the next 2 years.
@TheDwightMamba8 ай бұрын
I used to tell my car stereo customers back in the day when car stereos were a thing.... "If you have room for 2 12" subs, you have room for 3 10" subs."
@vaffangool6 ай бұрын
24≠30
@IndaloMan8 ай бұрын
Back in the 80s I used to fly all over Saudi Arabia in a Falcon 50 owned by Philips Telecommunications. They had a fleet of Falcons with tail numbers from PH-ILA to PH-ILZ
@MilitaryScience-y4q4 ай бұрын
Falcon trijets are such elegant aircraft !!!
@robbyowen91078 ай бұрын
Great stuff as always, thanks Sky!!
@tonylam95488 ай бұрын
There is an old joke in the piston era, about how many engines you need to be safe. The engineer tapped the captain on the shoulder and report engine number 24 failed, and the captain asked...........on which side?? Even with 4 engines, one Connie was almost dragged into the sea by a prop that refused to be feathered. The captain saved the plane by his idea of cutting off the oil to the prop and caused the shaft to seize and break. I doubt in today's glass cockpit, the pilots have controls of such fine details.
@Bill_Woo8 ай бұрын
Hello, Sky! It's great to hear your voice!
@bhumiriady8 ай бұрын
Fascinating video on the Dassault Falcon 900! Also, I'd love to see more videos on the Dassault Falcon series as well as other business jet series like the Cessna Citation one day.^^
@Coyote279818 ай бұрын
Dassault = Da-SO
@Mihaig5438 ай бұрын
The Cockpit shown at 4:05 is not the Honeywell Primus 2000 Cockpit, it is the Honeywell Primus EPIC CDS/R cockpit, it was a retrofit cockpit for the legacy F900B cockpits (SPZ based systems), the Primus 2000 Cockpits have smaller displays with bezels
@ZekikAbdelhamid-vk4nf8 ай бұрын
The show was so special and perfect,thanks a lot to designer for the great effort ,✨🌟✨ Forever love respect and success...Zekik Abdelhamid(Tetouan_North of Morocco)
@danjams8 ай бұрын
Falcon 20 was the first airplane I remember FED EX first started out with. I worked at Denver Beechcraft FBO in the 1970s and FED EX came in every day to refuel with the Falcon 20s. It was a fledging company at the time.
@machintrucGaming8 ай бұрын
Kinda wild a cargo airline started by using a bunch of private jets
@PRH1238 ай бұрын
I knew one of the guys that did the cargo door modification to the falcons. I think they still have a falcon hanging in the foyer of one of the buildings in Memphis.
@PRH1238 ай бұрын
@@machintrucGaming they had to at the time, moving to cargo aircraft required legislative rule changes that FX lobbied for in its early years The falcons were operated if I remember correctly as air-taxi (part 135), rather than as regularly scheduled (part 121), in the beginning, until FX got the rules changes that it needed.
@dg10197 ай бұрын
I worked on the load crew for the last Falcons that flew out of Memphis. I was a student at Memphis State at the time.
@Saml018 ай бұрын
Another great video. Great Job!
@mscheuring708 ай бұрын
I love all your videos! I found out about you by watching the "Wings of Russia" series.
@28ebdh3udnav8 ай бұрын
If you're new to the game, check out mentour now!
@Charly_Dont_Surf8 ай бұрын
I see one of these airplanes parked at the local airport every week always wondering why the 3 engines. Thank you for the info.
@albertseabra92268 ай бұрын
The Falcon were and still are the best business jet available.
@rtbrtb_dutchy41838 ай бұрын
Nope.
@AganKunic-mi4pi7 ай бұрын
It doesn’t need 3 engines. It has been designed with typical redundancy most aircraft have built in to the design. I5 gives confidence to owners who frequently fly over long stretches of water, ie, the Atlantic and Pacific
@trumpmypresident47219 күн бұрын
As usual...., another " EXCELLENT " review. Enjoy very watching your programs especially when your subject matter is ...., " JETS ". 🎉🎇🎆🎊HAPPY NEW YEAR 🎊🎆🎇🎉
@rudybriskar52678 ай бұрын
Beautiful bird!
@hugolafhugolaf8 ай бұрын
Trijets have this certain something that makes them cooler. BTW the pronunciation is Dass (as in « ass ») - Oh.
@GoSolarPlz8 ай бұрын
Great video. One comment: Dassault is pronounced “da-soh”
@dougball3288 ай бұрын
Thank you. Da-Soo was driving me nuts!
@semaex8 ай бұрын
Are you sure its not pronounced "Dessous" xD
@HQBergeron4 ай бұрын
That’s crazy. It’s assault with a D on the front. As in pass da salt, please!😅
@danburns37597 ай бұрын
Can’t bear to watch this as long as the narrator keeps saying Dassooooo
@justforever967 ай бұрын
Then don't watch it. Bye. I'm sure he will go and rerecord it for a third time to meet your demands, any moment now.
@jameslyddall7 ай бұрын
To b fair I’m just happy it’s not an AI narrator and his accent gives the videos a personality
@vaffangool91966 ай бұрын
@@justforever96 It's not just grating, painful, and categorically wrong-it's 100% inconceivable how anyone could land upon _dassoo_ as an appropriate, approximate, or even remotely reasonable pronunciation of _Dassault._ I'm not French but by god I've seen and heard the name _Renault,_ and I have to believe that anyone who repeatedly called it _Renoo_ would get repeatedly kicked in the nuts.
@vaffangool91966 ай бұрын
@@justforever96 It's not just grating, painful, and categorically wrong-it's 100% inconceivable how anyone could land on _Dassooo_ as an appropriate, approximate, or even remotely reasonable pronunciation of _Dassault._ I'm not French but by god I've seen and heard the name _Renault,_ and I have to believe that anyone who repeatedly called it _Renooo_ would get repeatedly kicked in the nuts.
@vaffangool6 ай бұрын
@@justforever96 It's not just grating, painful, and categorically wrong-it's 100% inconceivable how anyone could land on _Dassooo_ as an appropriate, approximate, or even remotely reasonable pronunciation of _Dassault._ I'm not French but by god I've seen and heard the name _Renault,_ and I have to believe that anyone who repeatedly called it _Renooo_ would get repeatedly kicked in the nuts.
@bendafyddgillard8 ай бұрын
Beautiful and obscene, like Marie Antoinette.
@Msoja8Ай бұрын
😂😂
@Msoja8Ай бұрын
We will eat cake in a Dassault.
@paulmoor5958 ай бұрын
What a great video. Ive always seen lots of these at London City Airport..It makes so much more sense now given their versality
@justforever967 ай бұрын
Trijets are so cool. Trimotors too.
@byrondot8 ай бұрын
Falcon 900 is a sexy jet😍
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Yss simar too tye cutanion x
@COIcultist8 ай бұрын
Sky after all your extra captions showing the Imperial measurement for metric units, you are still missing out thrust. The one thing I can't convert in my head. For everyone like me, 22.25 kilonewtons per engine is almost exactly 5,000lbs of thrust. As always, a great film. Looking forward to the lesser known soviet military aircraft. The Falcon was in the news this week as the RAF has a flight of them, one of which transported His Majesty King Charles III to Scotland.
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Chuef hybred jet 22 too 25 kw hybrude batrry
@Renato.Stiefenhofer.747driver7 ай бұрын
Dassssoooo ... really? I really loved to fly the Falcon 900, back in the 1990's. Great plane.
@keithexum73127 ай бұрын
I’ve worked on falcon 20, 100, 50 and 900 EX. I have also worked on Gulfstream II thru V. I’ll take the Gulfstream. Rolls Royce 👍🏻 more power on the pylon.
@marcg16863 ай бұрын
Pilots will choose the Falcon. Every time.
@keithexum73123 ай бұрын
@@marcg1686 and mechanics will take the Gulfstream.
@faisalhayatkhan54478 ай бұрын
Very informative
@mro94668 ай бұрын
The Lockheed Jetstar has literally 4 engines ☝🤓
@mitseraffej58128 ай бұрын
Along with pneumatic de icing boots, the weirdest stabiliser trim system imaginable where the fin moved with the stabiliser and so many dials and gauges it’s a wonder it didn’t require a flight engineer.
@daveblevins33228 ай бұрын
I remember refueling a Jetstar as a ramp rat back in 74. Those bullet tanks in the wings were pretty thirsty 💥💥
@AITCHESSPEE8 ай бұрын
@@daveblevins3322why did they have to turn you guys into rats for that job? That sounds cruel and unethical.
@douglasdennett45837 ай бұрын
This fine Aircraft has everything possible on Board - Just Stunning.!!! "Need's one more extra" Magical Jazzy Pop Music of Ms. Angelina Jordan...
@TRPGpilot8 ай бұрын
Thank you for utilising the International System of Units commonly known as 'metric' . . .
@A_Nice_Guy.8 ай бұрын
The French Directorate General of Civil Aviation logo looks like the Indonesian Ministry of Transportation logo, neat. @3:11
@raheemabdul10668 ай бұрын
haha thats exactly the same logo
@raheemabdul10668 ай бұрын
he used the wrong logo in the video, the french one says DGAC
@patolt16288 ай бұрын
@@raheemabdul1066 Correct, it's not the right logo
@pachiquesipe20578 ай бұрын
Wrong logo of DGAC 😂😂😂😂
@힐만948 ай бұрын
that's my thought, i think he put the wrong "dgca" when googling the logo... 🤣
@aaronaustrie8 ай бұрын
What a classic 🔥
@ministermacro7 ай бұрын
3:12 couldve sworn thats not the DGAC logo
@faulltw6 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video. Dassault is pronounced Da-So. A lot of people pronounce it incorrectly.
@vaffangool91968 ай бұрын
I had to make a decision whether to continue watching this video despite the voiceover insisting on calling the manufacturer Dassoo. Still salty about it but I made it to the end. Didn't learn much but the beauty shots were worth it.
@TheWholeTruth_3337 ай бұрын
Owners love the idea of having a third engine - especially when performing a crossing. In the case of the 900, the performance is so-so versus a Global, Gulfstream or the 2000 (with the Pratts). Great looking airplane, but honestly if I were an owner, I'd choose the 7X for the updated engines and performance. Just my .02
@schietdammer4 ай бұрын
But you can buy the 7x only on the 2nd hand market, the 900 the same story. On the dassault website you can order a new 900Lx and 8x. So i guess you meant 8x not 7x.
@mcal278 ай бұрын
Great Video Sky.. But a humble request for more of the lesser known Soviet military aircraft please 🙏
@SkyshipsEng8 ай бұрын
Coming soon)
@mcal278 ай бұрын
@@SkyshipsEng thanks ))
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Master chef navic show bigey iff with the mig
@kolerick8 ай бұрын
and Dassault did create software suits to design their planes... that were adopted by many other industries
@jean-mariejm74048 ай бұрын
Yes. CATIA system. Even used by Boeing!!
@Spectator19597 ай бұрын
This aircraft is why the F-16 is officially named the “Fighting Falcon.” The USAF wanted to call the F-16 “Falcon” in parallel with the F-15 being “Eagle” but Dassault had already grabbed the name for their bizjet.
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Master cgef has f16 f14 orucit yseage mach 2.0 not fuk efebcy mode
@Slyze337 ай бұрын
Interesting video 🙂 For your information, Dassault is prononced [Dass-Oh] ^^
@spladam38458 ай бұрын
I'd love to fly one.
@Fran_SG8 ай бұрын
A very nice plane. A myth. I love it.
@rtbrtb_dutchy41838 ай бұрын
You should look up what “myth” means.
@henriachalme4438 ай бұрын
Bellevideohhenri🎉🎉🎉🎉
@nicolasroirand80116 ай бұрын
Bonjour , merci .
@peteyou23258 ай бұрын
Two if by land, three if by sea.
@rocketPower0478 ай бұрын
I'll forever call them Dasooo, now
@flymacseamus34748 ай бұрын
Now finally please do the Rafale ?!? Pretty pleaaaaaase
@luto20008 ай бұрын
What’s the clip at 3:53 from?
@micstonemic696stone8 ай бұрын
England's Hawker business jet has been with us for a while has updated over the years with new Technologies Front two cockpit windows have a different look more Sporty maybe I like that Falcon if I could only choose
@PlanetFrosty8 ай бұрын
About 3:45
@captnjim44smith748 ай бұрын
A third engine in the tail, not three engines in the tail !
@oxcart41728 ай бұрын
For those saying that the pronunciation of Dassault is wrong, how do u pronounce Paris?
@thhseeking8 ай бұрын
How do you pronounce Berwick? Worcestershire? Barnoldswick?
@machintrucGaming8 ай бұрын
It's not Da-Suu but Das-uu-lt
@stein13858 ай бұрын
Yes 👍
@retepeyahaled29615 ай бұрын
My compliments on yet another very professional video which is also a joy to watch. I hope you don't mind that I suggest you improve the pronounciation of "Dassault"? If is not like you say "Dassue" but like "Dassoo", like in "go".
@piratapan8 ай бұрын
03:54 - Is that from a movie?
@BGTech18 ай бұрын
Wondering that too
@machintrucGaming8 ай бұрын
It's from french movie "Mon Cousin" released in 2020. Can't find much about it. The film might not even be preserved somewhere
@piratapan8 ай бұрын
@@machintrucGaming Thanks m8!
@patolt16288 ай бұрын
This one I don't know but at 18:11 there is a short sequence from the film "Les Chevaliers du Ciel" (The Sky Knights), released in 2005 and based on a famous cartoon in France (Tanguy et Laverdure) 🙂
@alfiospuson71658 ай бұрын
I will buy one
@jamielancaster018 ай бұрын
Taylor Swift has one of these that she uses 10 times or more a month.
@jamielancaster018 ай бұрын
Her other aircraft is also a Dassault Falcon 7X which is bigger and has longer range
@montanaosprey98408 ай бұрын
Sky, I love your channel. How long have you been “gone” from Mother Russia? And, lastly, I’ve always heard it pronounced “Da-sew”! Cheers!
@glennoropeza35452 ай бұрын
The Soviet era Yak 40 to the untrained eye could be mistaken for the the Falcon900. But the Yak didn't have range,speed or fuel efficiency!
@blazejibo7588 ай бұрын
"The Dassoooo" 😃
@justforever967 ай бұрын
Ironic that most of the people whining about how he pronounces Dassault probably call it "Mickoyin Gurrivich" and get just about every Russian name wrong. Proper names are pronounced differently in different languages anyway. I would also point out that the town of Saulte St. Marie is pronounced "Soo St. Marie", so clearly that pronunciation exists of that letter grouping.
@chandrachurniyogi83947 ай бұрын
the Dassault Falcon 900EX private trijet could have done with a slightly stretched variant . . .
@denverbraughler39488 ай бұрын
Why do you say “Dissoult” instead of “Dassault” (da`so)?
@marlibread8 ай бұрын
I did a little when chuckle when you used London to give range...and not Paris..
@micstonemic696stone8 ай бұрын
If I could choose my own jet I have been aware of the three engine Dassault Falcon, and that France don't really make bad aircraft and never have Should the opportunity arise I would buy an analogue Falcon trinket Thank you for making me aware of its abilities I would choose this over a gulfstream and also the etops regulations doesn't apply here I am so pleased you are still making videos With you I can properly learn about an aircraft which I love immensely and I am educated in the turbojet, thank you sky I wish you well. Mic 🙂
@giselasilva54158 ай бұрын
Dasseute 😂 just joking, good to know you keep posting videos ❤
@starbase2185 ай бұрын
Max Verstappen has one as well (the EX version).
@ClutchCobraKID18 ай бұрын
More engines is more better lol. Yea what he said: No wack side sticks here lol.
@superskullmaster8 ай бұрын
I’m team North America but the three holers from France are the sexiest business jets there are.
@michaelgill72488 ай бұрын
All of the completions (interior, avionics, etc.) deliveries are done in Little Rock, AR.
@superskullmaster8 ай бұрын
@@michaelgill7248 Merica!!!
@bernhardecklin70058 ай бұрын
Very interesting, thank you. Detail: Please pronounce Dassault correctly. It is pronounced "DASSO" and not " DASSU".
@parimal75288 ай бұрын
Dassault should bring something to compete with PC24 with gravel landing feature. It's 10x will certainly beat G700.
@ABCantonese8 ай бұрын
If this is the case with trijets, will we ever see new Dash-7s or A340s?
@brianb-p65868 ай бұрын
There is approximately zero chance of a Dash-7 revival. Even the restart of Dash-8 (Q400) production is not certain, and it it is far more desirable to customers.
@ABCantonese8 ай бұрын
@@brianb-p6586 Yeah that was mostly a joke. Is anyone surviving in the prop-liner business?
@brianb-p65868 ай бұрын
@@ABCantonese De Havilland is planning to restart the DHC-8-400, and lots are in service. The alternative is of course the ATR 72. I assume the Embrader, Dornier, and Saab models are long gone from production, but they remain in service. They all seem to be settling into cargo and specialty roles (where efficiency is the most important factor) rather than airline service. Two props, of course...
@christianbayerstein52438 ай бұрын
The era of 3 engine private jets is over, even Dassault gives up and replaces the 900lx and 8x trijets by the 6x and 10x twinjets.
@schietdammer4 ай бұрын
8x can land on a small airfield like aspen usa , the 10x can not (it weighs more then the 100.000lbs allowed + wingspan is more then the 95feet that is allowed). I hate to drive from a big airfield (10x) to my destination which has a smaller airfield next to it where an 8x could have landed. So the 10x is OUT that leaves the 6x, it can do aspen BUT only has a range of 10.186km (the 8x 11.945km) + the 6x uses more fuel per km then the 8x. SO more fuel burn and less range. The 6x has only 1 thing better then the 8x and that is cabin width is 2,58m (8x 2,34m).
@stanleylee80844 ай бұрын
It can still work normally with only 2 engines.
@argamulyana8 ай бұрын
bro put the wrong logo for the dgaf 😭😭, that logo was for indonesian ministry of transportation
@turipz8 ай бұрын
It's not pronounced "Dassoo" - it's "Dasso", like you pronounce water in French - "Eau" (like "Eau de toilette", and in this configuration, with the engines being at the very back of the plane - they push it, not pull it.
@Patriot38 ай бұрын
I know the answer to the question. So it can speed to create lift.
@ml.27708 ай бұрын
moar power!
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Tgatscwhat masyer chef say
@christianbayerstein52438 ай бұрын
It is time that the old Falcon 900 is replaced by the new 6x.
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Yes need hybred jets 2 60 kw batery hybredd jets
@patolt16288 ай бұрын
Interesting video but, as a Frenchman, I'm a little bit annoyed when I hear continuously that the French are doing everything differently. You can't refrain from making this kind of cheap and tiring joke even if you don't mean anything ... Well if it's true, then the rest of the world is wrong 😉 You should try to take interest in some French culture to understand better the mindset and avoid saying "Dassew" instead of "Dasso". Anyway no need to be fluent in French since the name Dassault is quite well known in aviation, isn't it? I should maybe consider to pronounce English names using French codes🤔. It might be hilarious ... For history: as shown at 1:11, the first jet of this business jet "family" was named "Mystère 20" since it was more or less an homothety (wings and tail-unit) of the "Mystère IV", a French fighter jet of the 60's. It has been renamed "Falcon 20" to make it easier to penetrate the US market and it worked. From then on all Dassault business jets are "Falcons" ... No hard feelings. Regards
@polarking8888 ай бұрын
Yak141 video please
@thomasburke79958 ай бұрын
Much like the L1011.. the falcon tri-jets default to thier military heritage then hipster trendy designs of thier competition. Windscreens replacements are simple and cheap with the 700 a single square pane , unlike a g5 which is curved and specific to left or right.
@peterallen31057 ай бұрын
Why do you need 3 engines? Are they undependable ? Most airliners now have just 2 engines. Falcon 10 was the best for the French, a tank in the sky.
@tonylam95488 ай бұрын
The ETOPS considerations been less important by operating costs considerations. Twin engined planes had to be more powerful to meet FAA single engine climb requirement. When an engine of a twin failed, you lose by your figures about 50% of the power, but in real life, is actually closer to 60% , and the 3 engine about 40%, because not only the failed engine is not working, but is dead weight and drag and you cannot feather the first stage fan. Also, recent decades of engine failures have taught the industry it is not so much how many engines you have , but how it failed. Jets sometimes failed by exploding and one such explosion of an L1011 cut all three hydraulic systems, and the A380 engine failure damaged other vital systems, luckily it happened close to an airport, then there was the Airbus with a fuel leak over the Atlantic.
@sharonbraselton31356 ай бұрын
Song jet. Jets biat lose same powrr at oump
@mytmousemalibu8 ай бұрын
Ive wrenched on an early 90's Falcon 700 a couple times and a Falcon 20. No mistaking them for anything but French! Nice plane though.
@idiokrat5 ай бұрын
Dassoo? Dassoh!
@adrianrubi50128 ай бұрын
Is this one of those business jets that are Single Pilot certified?
@superskullmaster8 ай бұрын
Actually a twin loses more like 60-65% of the relative thrust because of the drag the rudder deflection causes.
@rtbrtb_dutchy41838 ай бұрын
What? No. 😂
@danielrose13928 ай бұрын
Not sure where you got these numbers from, but it's definitely not that bad for rear mounted jet engines. One advantage of this mounting position is a minimal leverage for the engine so asymetric thrust barely moves the plane. Worst are short and slow twin propeller planes. In these planes Those planes sometimes have a Vmc far above the (twin engine) stall speed. If you fly slower and an engine fails, you gut a huge problem. Depending on the type your rudder will cause too much drag and you can't accelerate without loosing altitued, or at full deflection of your rudder you won't be able to fly straight ahead. So yes, if you can't even use full thrust of your remaining engine, you are quickly left with very little thrust.
@superskullmaster8 ай бұрын
@@danielrose1392 for sure a rear mounted twin will be much closer to 50%, I was speaking about something like a 757, 767 or 777 that is is heavily loaded
@dougball3288 ай бұрын
His explanation of loss of engine on takeoff is flawed. The certification requirements are such that with one engine out, a twin has a greater climb gradient capability than a tri, and a tri is greater than a quad. So you have greater excess thrust, one engine out, on a twin. All due to the way cert requirements drove the design.
@clavier25604 ай бұрын
Dassault trijets were also used as bombers......one launched two Exocets on USS Stark ( by mistake...)
@marcg16863 ай бұрын
Nope, the Iraqi AF used the Super Etendard.
@clavier25603 ай бұрын
@@marcg1686 sorry but you are not aware.....Sure they also used Super Etendard but as they need more endurance to reach some iranian tankers round Sirri island , they used a Falcon 50 ( N°51) specially equipped to train Mirage F-1 crews and fitted with two exocet missiles....
@marcg16863 ай бұрын
@@clavier2560 My apologies. I didn't know that. Many thanks.👍