Get 4 months for free on a 2-year plan here nordvpn.com/nordsky It’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✌
@bossthefluff2 жыл бұрын
I flew A380's until Covid hit. Now I'm flying King Air's. I truly miss the side stick. I spent my first 7,000 hours on conventional controls, and the following 14,000 hours on side sticks. I was a bit skeptical switching from DC10 to A330, to say the least, but it was a very positive experience for the most part. My general impression through life is that people love to have opinions. Often they're not based on actual experience or subject knowledge. One example is the truckloads of pilots who have told me that Airbus is absolute crap and they hate it. Half of them have never flown an Airbus, and the other half spent 15 years on Boeing's and half a year on Airbus before making up their minds. There's no perfect aircraft. I've flown Boeing, Douglas, Airbus, and a collection of turboprops. If you give me a flying job where I can choose an aircraft and with all things being equal I will always choose an Airbus. The side stick is one of the reasons. I haven't flown the 220 or any of the Bombardier regional/business jets, though I would love to have a go, but if I could choose I'd choose a model with a side stick.
@Lipeboussada123452 жыл бұрын
Seeing you describe all these aircraft that you flew, and me being just a private pilot, gives me encouragement to experience something similar. To keep me fighting, because the flight hours only get more expensive. Could you give me some tips to start this path? I imagine it wasn't easy for you sir
@bossthefluff2 жыл бұрын
@@Lipeboussada12345 If you want to be a professional pilot and don't have much money there's only one way: Determination. Get yourself to the 250hrs required for a CPL & CFI by asking friends and acquaintances if they want to take part in small flying adventures. Fly to nearby cities for exploration or just lunch at the airport greasy spoon. I lived in SoCal and would go on day trips to Northern or Central CA or to Las Vegas or Lake-this-n-that and "share" the flying cost. As a CFIIME I spent 7 days at the airport and befriended everybody. Always curious. Always helpful. Always eager to come along if anybody needed a safety pilot or just company. That built up to 85hrs per month, mostly paid hours, and many happy students who recommended me to others. At 1500hrs I got a job flying twins (Navajo Chieftain) between Burbank and Grand Canyon mostly, but also all over the Southwest. At 2500 I joined the airlines. At the Chieftain job I had 1 day off per week, but one time I worked 7 weeks in a row. I was happy as a lark. Of course it's not sustainable through your career, and also illegal once you're on the Airline track, but I'm a firm believer that if you have an actual goal, then you should probably work on it 7 days per week, be it on the clock or not. I have more than one airline friend who spend their days off in single engine propeller planes or on the model airplane field. So 7 days per week on something you love is a properly spent life in my book. Good luck. It's well worth the effort.
@Arun436474 ай бұрын
Finally a video that matches its visual with the narration, with little flaws👍 Mach 0.925 is 1130 km/h (708 mph)
@scotttaylor29042 жыл бұрын
I love how you get into the details. Thanks.
@pilotnico2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for uploading! This aircraft is indeed incredible 😍
@gaittr2 жыл бұрын
Sky, like everyone I very much enjoy your content. I did want to point out one thing that you missed that the Bombardier has an as an advantage. It's Landing here is set up to land on unimproved fields where the Gulf Stream is not. I still hate the side stick but oh well. I'm a stick and Rudder pilot.
@aaron___60142 жыл бұрын
Call it out!
@octagonPerfectionist2 жыл бұрын
some pilots love the side stick because it means they can have their lunch on their lap!
@gaittr2 жыл бұрын
@@octagonPerfectionist that's really funny. Do you fly side stick? I fly a center stick, a kitfox.
@LBCORP19602 жыл бұрын
I’m old school. I, too, prefer the yoke over the “video game controller.” But this jet and others coming out now are designed for the video game generation, so the side stick it is.
@OMG_No_Way2 жыл бұрын
New Gulfstreams have a side stick as well.
@RasheedKhan-he6xx2 жыл бұрын
What's ironic is the C series was offered to some US airlines for as low as $20M - a fraction of the price of the corporate jet. This was when the US accused the Canadians of "price dumping", sanctioned Bombardier and forced the sale of the model to Airbus as the A220. But seriously - $20M?! If we pass the hat around the comments section we could probably raise that much! :D
@erictremblay49402 жыл бұрын
I read that Delta's CS100 (now the A220-100) were offered at $22M, not $20M. Also they were "paper" derated with a lower maximum take off weight / lower range - to justify the initial lower price. It's understood that Delta later elected to pay extra $ to remove that "paper" derating.
@RasheedKhan-he6xx2 жыл бұрын
@@erictremblay4940 Ahh what's a couple of mil between friends.
@danielkandi81052 жыл бұрын
And how much was the max8 offered at?
@frankgaleon51242 жыл бұрын
Sky told about such a “supersonic” test made by the Dougla DC-8
@trash4cash4542 жыл бұрын
Yes, they've done it in 1960's
@WideLoad4052 жыл бұрын
Oh, how'd I miss a Skyships upload, man? These are always a bright spot in any day a new one comes out.
@aaron___60142 жыл бұрын
Why are comments like this all over KZbin?
@bernardanderson37582 жыл бұрын
I’m not looking no further details being a Gulfstream guy for years but unfortunately the Global 7500 in which I got a tour in one and this one has it all the accommodations you can only ask for and it’s already equipped as living in and out of this tremendous the top of my list of personal and private luxury travel. I’m seeing more companies as of Netjets and others joining in on being the best
@Trump1452 жыл бұрын
I've been watching you for a couple of years and I finally subscribed. This happens to be my favorite aircraft on the planet as far as business jet the Bombardier Global Express. Just saying the name gives me such satisfaction, thanks for the video what really made me go wild was the 8000 model with a top speed of Mach .094.
@robmills7611 Жыл бұрын
Finally, a private jet video that actually educated me! Really appreciate that, thank you! 👍
@franciskt41712 жыл бұрын
Amazing product, waiting to see it reaching Mach 1 soon...
@bendafyddgillard2 жыл бұрын
What a sleek, beautiful, obscene ship. That cockpit is a work of art, must be thrilling to fly. Sad that these magnificent machines are mostly in the service of some of the worst people in the world for the most trivial selfish purposes. Not Niki Lauda though, he was still cool, RIP.
@Dan.d6492 жыл бұрын
A very beautiful airplane, and a hefty price tag. It has the range also to cross the pond. Must have a sparkling interior.
@mic7504 Жыл бұрын
Yeah the big pound and the equator.
@turdpike2 жыл бұрын
Huge fan of your work! Awesome videos! Way off topic but I’d sure love to see a series on De Havilland Canada products. Specifically the DHC-2 to -7. I’m sure you’d nail it!! Cheers
@EvDelen2 жыл бұрын
@18:35 the commercial aviation division has been completely divested. They sold the Q400/Dash-8 program to Longview Aviation Capital Corporation, parent of Viking Air which produces the CL-415 & CL-515 "Super Scooper". They also sold the De Havilland name, so LACC has setup a new De Havilland aircraft to produce the Q400/Dash-8. They sold the Canadair Regional Jet program to Mitsubishi. They sold the C-Series program to Airbus, now the A220.
@leo88aum2 жыл бұрын
Hello from Toronto,Canada
@trash4cash4542 жыл бұрын
Ha, the competition of the Gulfstream stream and the Bombardier will eventually lead to the fact that in 10 years we will see how their flagships become supersonic. Just the evolution of technology and competition
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
It will not happen in 10 years. It will take at least that long to develope a supersonic aircraft once it is announced. Bombardier does not have the money required to do a supersonic.
@Puzzoozoo2 жыл бұрын
Dassault will be introducing their 10X around the same time as the 8000 enters service.
@Southwest_923WR2 жыл бұрын
Great video, love the Global, but my full heart STILL belong to Gulfstream!🤷🏿♂😉😎
@DanO530.89 ай бұрын
In the last cabin where there is a couch that makes to a bed bombardiar should put a cushion head board on the wall so when the couch is put to a bed it actually looks like a bed and when in the mile high club you don’t bang your head …
@45searay Жыл бұрын
I’ve watched several of your videos and they are all excellent!
@TheMotorick2 жыл бұрын
If you'll allow me to nitpick one thing that is very noticeable to Americans: Tucson is pronounced with an emphasis on the first syllable. Too-sahn.
@ThePuschkin19862 жыл бұрын
you sold me Sky, I'm gonna get me one! I'm sure there must be a stash of 75 million lying around here somewhere...
@plebreton012 жыл бұрын
Great Video. I'd love to see on one the Beechcraft 1900
@ChrisLutolf2 жыл бұрын
Did y'all spot a fun detail: legendary actor Bruce Willis is in the audience at one of the initial presentations @13:58!😎
@Aeronaut19752 жыл бұрын
9:48 A "Kitchen" in an aircraft or ship is called a "Galley" (gal-e).
@rex82552 жыл бұрын
The mach 1 flight is, I think, more than just PR, and an important test. If you have a business jet that can go at a steady speed just short of Mach 1, then there could be circumstances in which it would attain or exceed that. From my understanding, the "trans sonic" portion is the hardest on the air frame (see instances of crashes in WW II with the faster piston engine fighters that lead to a lot of this research in the first place), and it's worth knowing that the air frame can handle the stress.
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
There are FAR regulations that require manufacturers to test their aircraft. In this case, they have max speed for Global 8000 to be mach .94, so they are required to test it to a speed greater than that. In this case they were required to test to greater than mach 1
@roguewave1060 Жыл бұрын
Strange layout: forward toilet for crew. The rear toilet for passengers, but how will passengers use this rear toilet when they have to go through the bedroom where the Boss is sleeping?
@iwishitwasajoke5169 Жыл бұрын
Forward toilet is both for crew and guests
@stradivarioushardhiantz51792 жыл бұрын
Upgrade program for Global 7500 into Global 8000 will be a big bargain for the customers
@brettrun85752 жыл бұрын
GL8000 does not exist.
@TSERJI3 ай бұрын
@@brettrun8575 Yes it does. They're intending to discontinue the 7500 & replace it with the 8000, because the two are identical aside from the fact that the 8000 is faster & longer range, so there's literally no reason to keep making/selling the inferior product. It'll just cost the company more money in tooling/production to make two products vs making just one. Plus, the current 7500 owners can take their jets to Bombardier & have them retrofitted to become 8000's, instead of having to buy brand new 8000's.
@TRPGpilot2 жыл бұрын
The best indeed! Thanks for uploading!
@JoeRogansGutBiome2 жыл бұрын
Look at that massive fuel tank bulge below the fuselage that's the secret to its distance.
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
No it is not. All you see is composite fairing. The fuel tank is integral to the center fuselage and of course the wings.
@chucklohn522 Жыл бұрын
What is cheaper to operate? The ACJ TwoTwenty or this 7500?
@WilliamMitchell-sc3fe Жыл бұрын
I'd say bombardier is more like a megalodon shark. They're not going to give up!
@mic7504 Жыл бұрын
Wow just 6 of these babies pays for Bombardier's new $400 million plus dollar manufacturing plant in Toronto.
@JonMartinYXD2 жыл бұрын
900m cabin pressure is a really big deal for reducing jet lag. I do wonder about the larger windows though. There are a lot more damaging UV rays at altitude and if they haven't treated the windows accordingly, passengers and crew will definitely need to wear some sunscreen.
@kostis2849 Жыл бұрын
any plastic blocks UV''s, and this is the reason plastics wither when exposed to the sun for a long time, they de-polymerise
@henrysantos71602 жыл бұрын
Another great video well done. The real matatan jets.🤔. Ribirin.
@henrysantos71602 жыл бұрын
The real matatan.🤔.
@jonoon272 жыл бұрын
Incredible aircraft, video, and information. Great job as always. The pity is the number of people who will use, travel in and fly it can be counted on the fingers of just a few. We mortal souls will never get into anything resembling this. Then the question is....so what? Why bother...?
@bwayobrian33812 жыл бұрын
Both Gulfstream and bombadier kip pushing eachother in the elite private jet sector to the amazement and appreciation of its loyal customer base who are spoilt for choice..😃✌️
@christopherdaniel48412 жыл бұрын
Needless to say, I want one. In fact I need one living in Denver with an apartment in Singapore. Have just been waiting for the range increase...
@Genxtrucker722 жыл бұрын
Nice aircraft but still like the Gulfstream especially the G700
@frankchan42722 жыл бұрын
Pity Learjet is gone now so this new business jet has taken over. Nice business jet.
@flightmaster9992 жыл бұрын
Learjet was owned by Bombardier
@johnnylogan222 жыл бұрын
Is that going to be John Kerry‘s next airplane
@paulo61042 жыл бұрын
They sold the cs300 to Airbus and Q400 and crj production to Mitsubishi, I am surprise bombardier is still an aerospace company
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
They still have all the business jets and service centers. Globals and Challengers. They also retained Learjets but they shuit that line down recently
@lavafree2 жыл бұрын
Love it, please send me a couple of those 😂
@777jones2 жыл бұрын
So you’re saying, there is a chance…
@gbixby34532 жыл бұрын
You should look at the Citation 10 if you can... as I understand it may actually be faster then the Bombardier. Also... already a nord vpn user.
@dwaynetaylor41652 ай бұрын
I love this plane
@landryabraham6422 жыл бұрын
Magnificent aircraft love it
@COIcultist2 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for reintroducing the thrust in lbs. 1st sponsored video? What happened to Smokey's Lounge? It's the standard Skyships background music, it seemed unusual to watch without it in the background.
@TRPGpilot2 жыл бұрын
That's a retrogressive step. The world understand metric, not obsolete units hardly used by anyone . . .
@COIcultist2 жыл бұрын
@@TRPGpilot Oi! What altitude do you fly at? I've said to Skyships repeatedly that I can do metric conversions in my head to anything other than thrust values, Skyships is a very obliging gentleman. BTW, not only altitude, what speed do you fly at or range can your plane cover? All are Imperial units.
@Colaholiker2 жыл бұрын
@@COIcultist Not all miles are imperial! Nautical miles, and the unit of speed derived from them, knots, have nothing to do with imerial units. They are much older, and still very common in aviation and nautical applications.
@COIcultist2 жыл бұрын
@@Colaholiker The concept of the Nautical Mile was old, but a value was probably first given to it by Robert Hues, The 1929 conference to define the Nautical Mile wasn't ratified by the US and Britain. The UK does now define the Nautical Mile in metric terms, and it is about 7 and a quarter inches shorter than the Imperial Nautical Mile. Mind you, the metric definition was changed from 1,852 metres to 1,853 metres. Practically, I'm not too bothered about 7 and a quarter inch.
@dreuxlescell3184 Жыл бұрын
When are you going all electric?
@naughtiusmaximus8302 жыл бұрын
Should have named it Globo Homo.
@bika49422 жыл бұрын
I would prefer customised.
@Hemidakota2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video Sky.
@andrewsmactips2 жыл бұрын
I asked them if they'd swap out the cadenza for a fireplace but no such luck. I'm returning my deposit.
@JoeRogansGutBiome2 жыл бұрын
This thing is sick. If I was every rich enough one day I would rent this with VistaJet and take me to a exotic location around the world on vacation.
@facundofreire53592 жыл бұрын
Thx for the video!
@ashishsam7356 Жыл бұрын
Great video
@robinwade25472 жыл бұрын
Makes you proud to be a Canadian just wonder what would have happened to the company with proper funding
@gl49892 жыл бұрын
Proud to be a Québécois, indeed.
@dcw562 жыл бұрын
So, it's another Lockheed design, then?
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
How is this a Lockheed design?
@brettrun85752 жыл бұрын
Taking an aircraft supersonic in a steep nosedive and posting a high max speed limit on paper mean nothing in terms of real world cruise speed and efficiency. The Global flies much slower in cruise and is much less efficient at high speed when compared to Gulfstream.
@randomuser19672 жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@suryopdw27952 жыл бұрын
I find it astonishing that you like everyone doing review of this and other planes have seldom mention Sleeping arrangements guest lavatory essential to sustain a 10 hours flight!?? Always show settings, lounge, room shower, speed and passenger capacity! Q owner sleeping in his private room, 11 guest travelling flying 10 hours.. Where do they sleep? Where is their rest room? The crew have theirs! While 11 guests and owner Look mostly to share owner single bath room? Than it's a public bed room??... As only way to the bathroom is via this room? Trust you have been on 10hours flight and experienced lines to go toilet etc.. I have yet to hear any of these plane tours ever speak of guest comfort on a 10 hours flight!! Good you be the first!!
@colonelmustard26522 жыл бұрын
The interior for a sales demo unit is kept generic to get people thinking about how they'll customize it to their own requirements. The configuration you describe is almost an intentionally bad troll move for the sales department. At this cost, no one takes a default interior configuration.
@Jsiwnakxhenalancbdksmsl2 жыл бұрын
Reliability wise gulfstreams are better
@ibaranykov2 жыл бұрын
Работал я там несколько лет на этом проекте, барахло этот самолет полное. Фантик с снаружи красивый а без ремонта и замены после каждого полета он просто рухнет как топор. На него MRB запросы пошли еще задолго до начала производства, трещины, неправильная клёпка, брак и тд. Низкооплачиваемые работяги в ботах прямо по тонким бракетам ходили, гнули всё беспощадно еще на этапе сборки. И кто его там " разрабатывал", нагнали сотни мароканцев, индусов и другой сброд под руководством кучки местных лицензионных инженеров без знаний и опыта, ибо местное образование это днищще. Натырили технологий из британских и штатовских компаний и сотворили дикий венегрет из документации. А уж эти глянцевые картинки, это вообще бред, я лично наблюдал мышей в офисе и столовой главного их завода в центре Монреаля. Всё настолько старое и занюханное, что любой совдеповский НИИ фору даст. Любите вы всё иностранное воспевать а своё унижать. А в реальности у нас на предприятии в конце 80х всё было во сто крат круче поставлено по части производства, чем сейчас на этой шараге по отмывке бюджетного бабла. Своё развивайте. И всё получится.
@SpoonestGuyEver2 жыл бұрын
I prefer Gulfstream. I dont like Bombardiers cabins. Gulfstream, Embraer and Falcons interior are beautiful.
@zloinaopako2 жыл бұрын
Very informative video. Funny how you sound like a 60 year old, though obviously you are much younger.
@globoliver9697 Жыл бұрын
1,88 m cabin height?? 😢 Not for tall people...
@msolemon2 жыл бұрын
Vive Le Canada
@joseoswaldomartinezrodrigu1542 ай бұрын
Si las personas no pueden salir a sus vacaciones es porque hay que limpiar la casa y el barrio, el distrito no vas a dejar un vigilante cuidando un centenar de rateros y criminales, igual uno que les cuida o los va a cambiar
@carleeroseterangi69232 жыл бұрын
All Jets,worldwide. 1,600.keys please.
@joseoswaldomartinezrodrigu1542 ай бұрын
El señor que barre, la señora que hace los uniformes, el representante que vende el champú del avión, la señora de la salida del airport, la señora de las maletas, el dueño de los tornillos, etcétera. El que teje las corbatas y el hielo del jugo. Y las papas fritas . Y que si vas y me compras un borrador.
@Wishbeingrich2 жыл бұрын
☝
@RodrigoFCh Жыл бұрын
Léase wuote one 7500
@dekosobby2 жыл бұрын
fly donkey 2 ear 2 stamock
@ChosenOne66662 жыл бұрын
Still flying with Pratt and Whitney engines? Gulfstream went back to Rolls Royce.
@pilotnico2 жыл бұрын
No the engines are GE Passport 20
@ChosenOne66662 жыл бұрын
@@pilotnico Same difference
@CaptHollister2 жыл бұрын
And... ?
@colonelmustard26522 жыл бұрын
Probably still a bolt on option.
@ChosenOne66662 жыл бұрын
@@CaptHollister I dont understand your gibberish
@Jon.......2 жыл бұрын
"... a bit supersoic" ! What does that even mean? THUMBS DOWN
@malahammer2 жыл бұрын
Hah...I've spotted a design flaw......a window in the lavatory. Everyone outside will be looking in when the pax are doing their business........ffs!
@Colaholiker2 жыл бұрын
That's why it is called a *business* jet. 😆
@ugoernest37902 жыл бұрын
❤️❤️✋😊
@whiteandnerdytuba2 жыл бұрын
Isn’t this already surpassed by the 8000, so it’s already not the best
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
The 8000 is not in production yet. It will replace the 7500. The 8000 is just a 7500 with a few improvements
@whiteandnerdytuba2 жыл бұрын
@@rcairflr so you're saying the 8000 is the best
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
@@whiteandnerdytuba > I am just saying the 8000 is NOT in production yet and no one owns one yet. YES, it will be an improvement on the 7500. Your statement makes the assumption it is already the best. HOW CAN THAT BE IF IT DOES NOT EXIST YET?
@whiteandnerdytuba2 жыл бұрын
@@rcairflr because customers with a 7500 on order were offered the 8000 as an upgrade
@giritharjeevasuba52062 жыл бұрын
Lovely❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😍
@TecnamTwin Жыл бұрын
Gulfstream...
@ErraticPT2 жыл бұрын
Why do such small aircraft have so many windows? Its almost as if they saw the plans for larger aircraft and simply shrunk everything without thinking if less and maybe slightly larger windows would be better. If not as if there's a row by each one (many such jets have few if any formal rows).
@TRPGpilot2 жыл бұрын
Think about your question for a minute. Do you want a large hole in your pressure vessel?
@colonelmustard26522 жыл бұрын
Larger windows are difficult to keep safe in flight at low external pressure and they create decompression event risks to passengers.
@carleeroseterangi69232 жыл бұрын
7500.globol g.550.keys.g.550.keys.
@jeffwaddell83592 жыл бұрын
Totally Climate Friendly also I'm Sure...does it come in the electric model ? Didn't f***ing think so
@kzrlgo Жыл бұрын
"... flaunts a huge TV with advanced multimedia and sound" 😂 ... shows 32" LCD with what seems like a DVD placed lazily in front of the windows. Worth $60m for sure lol, what a joke. Be honest, you made this video from the sales brochure didn't you?
@evergrandebestrealestate4854 Жыл бұрын
Gulfstream is better than this lol
@endimious2 жыл бұрын
wow so cool in a world where 15 000 children die of starvation a day
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
These aircraft supply 100s of thousands of good paying jobs all over the world. From manufacturing to service to parts. If they go away, there will be many more starving. So take your pick.
@endimious2 жыл бұрын
@@rcairflr you missed the point completelly
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
@@endimious > I don't think I did. Your insinuation is somehow if the rich didn't buy jets there would be more money for the poor and starving. Some people just can't be helped no matter how much money you throw at them. These jets supply 1000s and 1000s of good paying jobs. If that is not the point, then exactly what is your point.
@jamiereneemilliganАй бұрын
@@endimiousthen help them. You help them. I need it for the amount of time stolen from me.
@air-headedaviator18052 жыл бұрын
Gotta be off off-putting using a side side-stick in your indominant hand
@RasheedKhan-he6xx2 жыл бұрын
I've often wondered about that. But I'm left hand so a lot times I have to navigate a world designed for right handed people (numberpad on your keyboard anyone?). The other thing is I travel and drive cars in countries that are both left and right hand drive. Even when driving a manual transmission, I find the switch isn't that hard.
@090giver0902 жыл бұрын
Even with a yoke you usually use only your left hand to use it, as the right hand is either on thrust levers or operating knobs and dials. Unless you fly a jet fighter.
@ejkk95132 жыл бұрын
Such poor taste for the ultra wealthy to be flying around in these things when most of the world is struggling. I admire the engineering, I despise the culture and customers who buy these things. Adding this much greenhouse gases on top of your poor taste is the icing on the cake of tone deafness.
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
What most people seem to not realize is that, there are 100s of thousands of good paying jobs because of these jets. There will be more poor people if they go away.
@ejkk95132 жыл бұрын
@@rcairflr The pilots who fly these are not poor people. They're generally the highest paid pilots in the industry. Pilots can always find a job as we've seen lately with the pilot shortage.
@rcairflr2 жыл бұрын
@@ejkk9513 > You completely missed my point. Read your post again and then read mine again. If you need an explanation, let me know
@marvincarlsen27012 жыл бұрын
As always nice video, would it be possible though to get someone without speech impediment?
@Razalibgdekli2 жыл бұрын
Dankon pro ĉio, kion vi prezentis, mi esperas, ke vi kaj ĉiuj viaj amikoj, parencoj kaj familio, kie ajn vi estas, ke la Ĉiopova ĉiam donu Sian gracon al ni ĉiuj. Pasis iom da tempo de kiam mi vidis aviadilojn kaj grandajn kaj malgrandajn formojn, sed mi neniam vidis sekurecan septon kiam la sistemo subite funkcias, kio estas uzata por eviti ke la aviadilo estu detruita kiam ĝi falas.Ne estas maniero, ke Aviadilaj fakuloj ne povas krei tian aferon, se mi pensas stulte kaj ridinde, se ni starigus ĝin kiel paraŝutadon je kvar punktoj, ĝi ne estus tro detruita.detruita aŭ almenaŭ malhelpita eksplodo ️🛫🛬