Slate Digital | Infinity EQ

Check Infinity EQ here: slatedigital.c...
MERCHANDISE: teespring.com/...
EXTRA CONTENT: / whiteseastudio
STUDIO: whiteseastudio...

[@niklassilen4313]

Pro Tip: FabFilter Pro-Q has had the ability to drag bands vertically or horizontally exclusively since version 1 almost a decade ago. Simply press and hold ALT before dragging either horizontally or vertically and it locks to the respective movement direction. Alternatively, hold CTRL to exclusively move horizontally while still having full control over Q width (up or down movement with the mouse).

[@Memphy]

u saved my life

[@georgepelekoudis]

Thanks! I screen captured that tip!

[@xinkay]

Yes guys, try to read the fuckin manual, fabfilter has ton of hidden features that you all need, but don't know yet.

[@pablom2274]

also linear phase

[@mixmasteranalyse9775]

Fab Q3 is the best :-) sorry slate

[@ThisIsMattyTrying]

I think one aspect people are missing is that this plugin is great for those who have or are looking at the Slate Digital Everything Bundle. Having this included in there with no change to the monthly cost is a huge win.

[@adalundhe]

Raven owner here! It’s an incredible product that has excellent synergy and satisfies my need for touch. It has excellent synergy with most all the major plugin providers, and even plays nicely (multitouch) with the Apollo console!

[@jmorrisey79]

Does it have excellent synergy?

[@MrSNEAKFREAK96]

You should try DMG Equilibrium! The most flexible EQ I’ve found in the box.

[@foxeguitar8020]

I have the Slate monthly subscription and this is in it. It's quite possibly the only EQ you will ever need lol. I am simply amazed at the amount of manipulation you can get with this thing. I ran it through some of my guitar tones on TH-U Slate and damn you can really get some amazing tones for your guitar or whatever instrument you run. I haven't messed with it using Synths and making electronic tunes yet. Gonna play around with doing that here in a bit.

[@MiDnYTe25]

4:50 it is possible to fix the X or Y axes in Q3 as well! You just have to hold Ctrl or Alt while you drag.

[@fredtimothy940]

you are making me feel better that I have pro q 3

[@kiillabytez]

As mentioned before, that isn't apparent on first glance, so it's a feature that is hidden from the user, which is a big minus in my book.

[@benjaminjohnlong]

I've never used Pro-Q but I've been using this eq for a bit lately, and I love it, it's become the go to eq i use most of the time

[@DacianGradaMusic]

great demo! been using this one on my latest production and I love it. I still prefer ProQ (specifically the v3) for specific things (quick mastering EQ that also involves some dynamic compression, also simply the fact that I'm more familiar with FF's interface and workflow, for now), but since this is included in the All Access Pass from Slate it's a tough competitor nonetheless!

[@dougd1573]

EQuilibrium. By far the best eq out there.

[@Ohms69]

quite right

[@odnilniloc]

It is quite superb!

[@jsaulkane5893]

yep... Mentioned this a year or 2 ago ... also would be good if you had some type of cpu usage reference.. for all the plugs..

[@xaosnox]

@@jsaulkane5893 That would be easy to show. REAPER puts that all in one easy place, but it combines the core usage, so it can be a bit deceiving if you don't know how it works.

[@kiillabytez]

Easy on the eyes and easy to use. My two most important factors. If it delivers what it promises, then it's a must-own VST. Infinity EQ hits all the marks. I really like it, and just wanted to see what you thought of it too. Great stuff.

[@RememberingGames]

Honestly very happy about that. I didn't want to spend the money on the FabFilter ProQ but I already have the all-access pass monthly subscription from Slate, soo, that's pretty cool!

[@fabriceoze]

Beautifull interface but i buy Fabfilter pro Q3 and have got a question did this EQ is dynamic? Thank you to Slate Digital and to White Sea Studio .

[@kniferideaudio]

It's getting to a point that just paying for Slate Complete is almost all you need at all for any plugins. If I was starting from scratch, I'd just get Slate complete and call it a day, but I have too much tied up in other products to justify it now.

[@erestube]

Don't get locked into one sound. Even The Beatles grew tired of always recording on the same equipment at Abbey Road.

[@contrarian8877]

Yeah right.

[@xaosnox]

That's the trap. You're lucky you didn't fall for it. It's all pretty substandard stuff. I won't do subs, or iLok. Period. Even if it's free iLok software like LUNA. You're much better off with PluginAlliance. They've got some of the best (next to UAD) in-the-box solutions available. elysia and brainworx both make extraordinary emulations that Slate just can't touch. I've found the Plugin Alliance versions to be of nearly the same quality as the UAD versions-you just don't get the real-time processing and Unison technology. Plus, they offer a monthly sub or a rent-to-own option. If I was starting from scratch, I'd definitely go for the FF Total Bundle, an Apollo with the Analog Classics bundle, the Plugin Alliance RTO option, and, if I could have only one mic, a Sphere L22. That combo gets you near perfect (or better in the case of the L22) emulations of millions of dollars/euros/pounds/rubles worth of mics and gear. I think FF is really losing a lot of money to Slate, PluginAlliance, and others by not offering a rent-to-own option for the TB. That seems to be the favored way to buy. Make your opinion known here: www.fabfilter.com/forum/3253/splice-rent-to-own?replies=95#comment13527 The Townsend Labs Sphere L22 mic modeling system is another example of Slate hype vs. real quality. The Slate VMS is a complete rip-off. You don't even get one decent sounding mic, let alone the collection they claim to emulate. The L22 usually sounds better than most of the original mics in use today, is a truly revolutionary system, and they keep adding value. The L22 has all the depth, openness, warmth, shimmer, and quality of the originals, plus lets you blend two mics or record in stereo. The VMS sounds choked, has no clarity, and sticks out like a sore thumb in blind tests, but good ol' Steve has the kiddies lining up with their lunch money anyway. Go figure.

[@contrarian8877]

@@xaosnox I haven't seen anything from Slate that actually impressed me or wasn't done better by another company. The FF Total Bundle is waaaaay better value than anything Slate can offer. Also, why would someone pay $20 a month in perpetuity? That's eventually going to be thousands and thousands over a lifetime when you can just get FF Total Bundle for like 999.

[@godface81]

Thanks for cruising through it a little and letting us watch. I just used it a couple nights ago and didnt have much time but was super impressed. Slate is looking very good

[@MarkDLion]

The best part of FF is that they use the GPU for the graphic which is the reason why they have a low CPU impact and the smoothest interface.

[@urigeheadmot1196]

Mark D Lion 💪🏻❤️ kings

[@frequency_sequencer]

I love the SSL Native XEQ 2 ... It's sounds really good almost very analog

[@np6715]

Love your videos. They are both informative and highly entertaining.

[@la.autordluke]

nice one dude! i use Fab filter and its amazing, the best tool is the one more easy to use! cheers

[@PictureMeFree]

At NAMM this year, Steven Slate Sid dynamic functionality will be added as an update in a few months!

[@red7332]

7:32 when you take off her clothes

[@ragingchimera8021]

Seems very slick, good UI and sound.

[@NealMiskinMusic]

It's a pretty good EQ, the next logical feature would be to make it a DynamicEQ. At this point, I feel like any new EQ that's not an analogue emulation of something might as well be a DynamicEQ, because why not?

[@vladsandu9713]

I use the Crave EQ instead of FabFilter. Pretty much a similar UI and some cool features too.

[@SebastianKomor]

ProQ3 def has a competitor now. If this EQ also gets dynamic EQ, FabFilter need to step it up. That being said, they both are really great EQ's.

[@sevenonsunday3968]

I have been enjoying Infinity EQ - Awesome interface

[@MCAlvesPortugal]

Hello. Can you make a review on vocal finalizer, friend?

[@Byronic19134]

Say what u want but this EQ looks gorgeous that gui is stunning

[@jasonzdora]

Try doing things like holding CTRL or ALT or SHIFT (or CTRL+ALT) at the same time when using FabFilter ProQ3. You can do all of these things you liked about the Slate sliders.

[@kiillabytez]

BUT, you have to press an additional button to activate it, so it really isn't as useful as it is here.

[@jasonzdora]

@@kiillabytez Since it took 3 years for someone to "ackshully" me about this, I know Im right.

[@Drfresh1402]

Fabfilter can add these features in one update. Personally, Fabfilter is still king.

[@DJayFreeDoo]

Yep! Pro Q3 has its phase modes, and dynamic eq features. the two things i feel the slate EQ should really have. and no sidechain between each instance of the eq to see where sounds collide. no EQ matching either. And this infinity EQ doesn't have anything really unique, But its workflow feels quick and easy to use. But i use linear phase mode on pretty much everything i want to bring to the front except for drums. So to bad the "Infinity" EQ doesn't have Infinite versatility.

[@EG_John]

@@DJayFreeDoo >> *this infinity EQ doesn't have anything really unique* Well, actually it does. But strangely enough, for some reason Slate does not advertise these features in any way. This is the only (known to me) equalizer that has the ability to change the slope of any filter to absolutely any value between 0.01 dB/Oct and 120 db/Oct. It's also the only equalizer with zero latency that's completely free of any bell cramping at the frequency border. Any Q for any slope of the cut, shelves with double Q, the ability to simultaneously equalize the Mid and Side (or Left and Right) in the same band. Even such a small thing as the band width in semitones - they were the first who thought of this seemingly obvious idea. That is, indeed, there are enough unique features that no one else has implemented. But somehow marketing almost completely ignores it all. The only thing I really miss is a variable phase, for complete flexibility. Not the way FabFilter does it, but the way iZotope does it, with the ability to set any arbitrary phase. But considering what Slate wrote on the GS forum, we can hope that over time this equalizer will acquire new functionality.

[@DJayFreeDoo]

@@EG_John Pro q 3 can: do the double Q thing by default, if you don't want that you just do a shelf and a bell if you only want one Q so to speak, It can, boost sides and cut mid at the same time and vice versa. just takes two bands to do it and move one down and the other up, select both and adjust the gain knob. more tedious but it can be done. same with L/R ofc. Sure you can't see semitones on the Q value in pro Q 3. but you can select the pianoroll button and it will display notes and semitones when moving the bands around. However, that 120db/oct slopes it doesn't have, unless the brickwall setting reaches that far. but that's not every band. But when making such steep slopes you might want to enable linear phase mode which is where pro q comes in again. Sure the slopes are in steps on pro q and its nice to be able to have more in-betweens, but the steps have been any enough so i haven't really thought about needing more of that. But maybe i will miss it once i get used to it. About bellcramping, it doesn't appear to happen with pro q 3. Maybe i've said this before but i do like the interface on the infinity EQ. But there is one button that's greyed out all the time. haven't figured that one out yet. will have to look in the manual. edit: ok so its grouping bands to stay grouped after deselected. thats neat. i guess it will work for automations to kinda ride the eq along note changes. Edit 2: Aparently you can't do automate them as a group with one automation track even when grouped or grouped and locked. Missed opportunity there.

[@EG_John]

@@DJayFreeDoo I'll tell you right away that I use and will use all the equalizers that I have depending on the task. Somewhere it will be Pro Q, somewhere it will be Nova, and somewhere Inf EQ. So, I'm just answering to your points, without a goal to somehow challenge your experience. >> *Pro q 3 can: do the double Q thing by default* It has two resonance peaks, but only one Q. If you want to change the Q separately, as you noticed yourself, you'll need a workaround. >> *The whole list of workarounds you've listed I won't address, I'll group them all under one line.* You see, any digital equalizer can achieve any result. Just use more bands for complex shapes and a steeper slope. Just use a mid-side decoder in the effect chain to get MS functionality. Or several different equalizers in series. But it's not about fundamental ability to achieve the same result, it's about how you interact with the equalizer. It's about your workflow. You can do one quick action or ten small ones just to get the same result. It's up to you to decide for yourself, whether it's convenient for you to do a few different things or just one thing to achieve the same result. >> *But when making such steep slopes you might want to enable linear phase mode* The phase I want will depend on the frequency I am working with. And it's likely to be a mixed phase. So I don't need a linear equaliser here, I need an equaliser with an arbitrary phase. And right now I miss it. Only iZotope and Acon are doing something quite close to what I need. >> *Sure the slopes are in steps on pro q and its nice to be able to have more in-betweens, but the steps have been any enough so i haven't really thought about needing more of that* And not just in-between. But also smaller values, less than 6dB/Oct. And no steps makes automation much more appropriate. >> *About bellcramping, it doesn't appear to happen with pro q 3* The Pro Q has a special natural phase mode, it is particularly developed to get rid of bellcramping. In minimum phase mode the shape of the bell is distorted, but not as much as most simpler equalisers. However, it is still distorted, which clearly shows the difference in algorithms between Pro Q and Inf EQ. >> *Aparently you can't do automate them as a group with one automation track even when grouped or grouped and locked. Missed opportunity there.* You can automate it, but only in automation recording mode. So I generally agree that this is a missed opportunity.

[@DJayFreeDoo]

@@EG_John I think i've mentioned workflow somewhere. some things are faster to do in pro q, some things are faster in infinity EQ. The bell cramping thing is something i guess i'll have to learn more about. the only solution for that i can think of is upsampling, but that would introduce higher latency and the latency between pro q 3 in zero latency mode and infinity eq in is the same.

[@oledahl.]

Great review! And it suits you really well when you are a bit calmer and serious😉 no pun intended! 🙏❤️

[@marc942]

Loving this eq, it’s been a game changer for my workflow

[@DieRettung]

Ist halt echt super, dass man den Zugriff sofort und relativ günstig bekommt und Slate so auch Kundschaft a greift, auf die Fabfilter halt aktuell noch scheißt :)

[@waltertill1388]

I tried to compare soundwise Q3 and inf EQ - i was impressed especially when it comes to mid side processing - i liked inf eq better .. but still i love q3 .. lets see what the next test bring out ;)

[@MixedByDotRob]

Can the plug-in do Steven Slate's haircut? Then I would buy it immediately ;D

[@keysbythenumbers]

This is the eq I've been waiting for. I LOVE IT!

[@guitaristfirst9697]

My favorite is DMG Audio EQality. And still nothing beats it for usability and sound.

[@ErikvanRavenstein]

1:04, 4:18 ... how to milk a boring cow (how enthousiastic the cow got 5:43). Thank you for this great video showing up in my recommendations. It’s quality content. Thank you KZbin algorithm.

[@paultp12cora]

Good Vid Mate Love The EQ And Just Got It

[@BluesLicks101]

Slate is an amazing company.

[@ciucyte]

i really like your videos. Awesome.

[@matiasduarte6286]

5:43 when you finally get the sound you want

[@mpstudionorway]

I like infinity for the possibility to increase the solo-frequency listen. I'm not a fan that you can't adjust the ratio along side the gain and freq knobs below. The ratio slide bar is very narrow and i have to focus to click the right spot. also another con is the activation of visibility of the functions require precise hover, while I'd like it respond at less proximity and not a direct hover. Pro Q, is the winner for me still when it comes to ease of use. If Pro Q 4 implements a solo-listen boost-listen, then i'd say not that much of a reason to switch, Also, infinity automatically changes curve based on where you click which is nice, but often times i'm looking for a bell at 200hz for instance, and it is an extra step to change it. There should be a shortcut og feature to let you choose bell as a standard, and to swap between proposed curve and a regular bell.

[@youngbloodmusic]

Great review bro.....Thanks

[@XiyuYang]

I would still stay with Fabfilter, to me it's the best ITB surgical EQ. Although I wish it gives more control on the dynamics and allow sidechain input for it.

[@kiillabytez]

You can sidechain any plugin. You don't need a special button for that.

[@DonClassico]

Looks fun and smooth to work it and sound clean. Nice

[@larrylillie2015]

What is the Name of the song you are playing also enjoyed the walkthrough

[@princeamu]

Yo you're really good. lol. Enjoyed the presentation and appreciate your honest knowledge

[@wlaaaaaaaaaa123]

if you arent on a budget get both, pro q an this. both have there advantages

[@BenLukemusic]

Can it be used on PT10 though on Mavericks

[@genericwhitename8776]

I’m surprised at how nice the UI is but I’d like them to add dynamic EQ, especially if it can be triggered by a sidechain like in the Pro-Q3

[@kiillabytez]

Do you really need a dedicated button to sidechain a plugin? Really?

[@genericwhitename8776]

​@@kiillabytez i mean first of all yeah the developer has to add sidechaining in order to sidechain with their plugin but also you should probably google what dynamic eq is since you seem to have missed the point completely (three years after I made the suggestion)

[@AudioGeekers]

Imo I think what’s next is to have the presets to be influenced on the fly by the type of track it’s working on. Maybe it’ll work by labeling the track first ,the plugin will recognize the name and the preset will adjust or the plugin will have listening features like what izotope does. Idk

[@sgfdancecompany]

great also you have the super meldaproduction mautodynamic eq for me the best one!!

[@blossom_rx]

Wytse, have you ever checked out Acon Digitals Equalize 2. It is an EQ plugin strangely nobody talks about. In the mass of EQ plugins out there, I didn't find any EQ like this. You can set M/S/L/R/STEREO bands individually for each channel. It has an efficient and intuitive design. You can shape the curves in every possible way and it has a freely settable latency time. You can even select a number of bands and move them simultaneously or connect the bandwidth to the gain parameter. I think this thing could be really interesting for you.

[@georgepelekoudis]

Very useful features. Not enough to make me switch from FabFilter, though. I can see FF implementing many of these features, in near-future updates.

[@Ohms69]

Please review bx_townhouse compressor (Brainworx emulation of SSL Buss compressor)

[@NessunDorma732]

pac0re amazing !

[@simonrussell77]

Very good but a LOT of aliasing in the algo.

[@Ohms69]

@@simonrussell77 yeah i used it for a while and was blown away but i grew out of it quickly it smeared the sound dramatically to my ears..

[@OneandOthermusic]

Looks like and awesome EQ but man switching would be painful... great vid !!

[@clolo4615]

Tone oosters eq is a good alternative to fab filter. For a lot less.

[@txfaulk795]

People sleep on this 1 very nice

[@DavidMorley]

You should try HOFA plugins. Their EQ is fabulous

[@DJILLEE]

It's only missing dynamic eq but I believe that slate is adding it later.

[@JayTheYTGuy]

When she says "Go head Daddy, touch" 5:43

[@DjR3aper]

it's them analog curves

[@Wh1teland]

haven't dl'd it yet but it looks promising. especially the sliding m-s mode but it is missing dynamic eq - I use at least 50% if not more dynamic eq ...

[@kennethquiroz5066]

Cubase users can relate to the stock "Frequency" plugin

[@peterbrandt7911]

Yes, Frequency is barely known and heavily underrated.

[@MarinSubasic]

@@peterbrandt7911 Yap it´s great!

[@AGAU1022]

Have you ever looked at Surfer EQ? Oak Felder raved about the side-chain dynamic EQ, but that was back in 2018, and I'm curious if there are other EQs that do side-chain dynamic EQ just as well or better.

[@DavidPixleythemuzzlZ]

One thing that I would think a new EQ would want to have is some sort of AI, auto learning, or auto matching curve generator. What I'd suggest is something like waves q-clone, that analyzes a curve from any other EQ plugin, and matches it, to the best of its ability. A q-clone type, matching curve plugin .. that also acted dynamically... would be even better. That'd kill, in today's market... because you could compare what various AI's suggest, and then tune or tweak it by ear. Especially, when it comes to mastering, I could see this feature being useful. I can tell ozone and tdr to learn something, then tell fabfilter to EQ match it, with some work... but tdr slick EQ m and Nova sound better to my ears, compared to fabfilter. Might just be me.

[@jocke1972]

Check out sonible smarteq

[@izvarzone]

no wai, where's creativity if robot mix song for you? Next time robot will eat pizza for you.

[@briankingart]

VERY GOOD! Good review, good commentary! TYVM

[@xplanet2112]

Great demonstration and discussion on the obvious comparisons between the Slate and Fab Filter products. I hope that Fab Filter will be forced to do something about their pricing now, I realise their plug ins are more focused on the professional market but their flag ship product has very serious competition now.

[@xplanet2112]

m_ita0 thank you for the heads up, I’ll watch out for it.

[@retsmej]

nice review. does it have auto gain compensation ? ffpro-q3 has dynamic as well.

[@Piotre]

Lacking of dynamics and possibility to side-chain it is placing it definitively behind Melda and FabFilter.

[@ACABSTUDIOS]

I see you clicking to add a point. Can you automate those parameters though?

[@BurningBushPedagogy]

The thing about this plugin is I can get that air high frequency sheen like with kush audio clariphonic, but nobody is noticing that, see how sweet the music sounded, when he boosted the highs, fab filter doesn't have that, just high not silky sheen high. Too bad people like only what is popular. But I dont see dynamic ability with this Slate inf

[@capartenlive3026]

Steven and Gabriel Are killers ! And if you have thé all accèss pass then no question it’s a good deal !

[@artisan002]

I'm quite impressed with what I'm seeing here. My one thought is that, while I can see how embedded mid/side filtering would be great for mastering, I can say it's not the way to go with REmastering. Too many old recordings are an ungodly mess and you need to handle EQ duties between mid and side very differently. But, remastring is it's own beast to deal with.

[@foxeguitar8020]

I've never thought about that before as I've never been in the position to remaster anything old. I may try it for fun and to practice my audio engineering ear with. I absolutely love playing with sound and getting in depth with design. I could imagine getting and old messy recording to sound crisp and clear could be a fun challenge!

[@artisan002]

@@foxeguitar8020 That's actually how I figured it out. I took a favorite old album I knew had issues (minimal budget + deadline = subpar studio choices, etc.) and started sorting out ways to fix it. I quickly started noticing other issues with other albums. I then started hating how some albums were mastered or even "remastered" in the '90s (why emphasize harsh highs in that 3 kHz to 6 kHz range???). But, seriously. Set up a mid/side split for anything you can and play with it. But, it's very handy for mastering and especially remastering. Also, it was noted in an AES webinar I attended last month that all vinyl ends up mastered in mid/side. (It also fixes earbud binaural mix issues)

[@fortheoneswhocare]

Looking good but Q3 is still ahead due to the dynamic EQing and using the spectrum analysis to quickly find a trouble frequency. I liked the way Slate implemented the mid/side processing though. But that's about the only thing it does better than Q3 imo.

[@mykolakonovalov3382]

klanghelm releasing eq sometime this year :)

[@fredtimothy940]

Great vid. The straight-line dragging of horizontal frequency vs vertical gain is a super welcome feature. However, what guarantees I will not buy this plugin is the lack of a Dynamic mode (I know dynamic eq has already been declared snake oil). I feel dynamics is a modern must-have feature, and consequently, I would even prefer the F6 over infinity, despite it's limited # of bands.

[@isaacowens_]

I actually had no idea they came out with this. Was about to get ProQ 3 but I already have the All Access Pass so I’ll give this a go first

[@dedaluz100]

Try some toneboosters v4 plug. Very good for the price

[@lucidproductions6457]

are you dutch? love your content! where are u located?

[@Noammats]

I always thought that EQ presets are the biggest BS of all. How can you offer solutions if you don't even know the source?

[@Byronic19134]

U should check out the Slate Air EQ and the way that does presets. It makes perfect sense it just essentially sets the bands and curves up for u but doesnt apply gain or frequency its designed to give u the tools common for certain things quicker

[@graysonwilson3343]

Presets can be awesome when you are newer to a tool to get an idea of what it can do. I use presets all the time to get an idea what a plugin can do, but tweak it from there once I have an idea of what direction I want to go.

[@DouglasComical]

You should check out Hornet’s Total EQ or the Reaper’s ReEQ (I think can only be used in Reaper

[@SimonasB]

Mid/side function is insane!!!

[@MankyFrilla]

Might be the first time I've heard "oohs & aaahhs".. ✌🏽🧠🎼🎹

[@gerardogarciagonzalez2001]

Gracias por el video colega, me ha gustado 😄👍🏼 Doy like y me suscribo ✌🏼😄

[@frequency_sequencer]

SSL X EQ 2 sounds really good

[@hans-austin]

All Q3 needs to do is add these band controls but honestly Fabfilter is better. If Slate added frequency build up highlights and the ability to have dynamic eq where the band moves as the frequency does like in Ozone Nectar etc then this Slate wins

[@futurebeats898]

Review dmg equelebrium

[@xaosnox]

Probably the only EQ that can beat Pro-Q³. All DMG products are exceptional, made with love, and are way ahead of their time. My version of EQuilibrium came out in 2013, and it has all the analogue character you could want with a pretty decent digital interface. It feels a little clunky compared to Pro-Q³, but the curves! Oh, my, the curves! Sounds incredible, and I rarely remember to grab it.

[@onaucc9899]

Does it have the dynamic EQ ability like ProQ 3 though? You know, the thing where you kind of have an compressor on every single band that you can use to make it do stuff in relation to the level of the incoming signal? Is that what you call "dynamic" or is it another name? :D

[@Mendelian]

5:44 Michael Jackson

[@cottoo1]

Nice, I will buy it eventually just to have it and please myself using it.

[@blancodeplomo]

Slate = Marketing engineer

[@Whiteseastudio]

Yes

[@blancodeplomo]

@@Whiteseastudio xD

[@Ohms69]

they still offer some fantastic sounding plugins though.. its not snake oil.. waves are bahahahhaha

[@pedrogoyamusic]

Yes, but with a damn good product to offer. After Uad, Slate is my choice. Itb with their plugins is just smooth.

[@Barncore]

Damn that bass boost was nice. No unnatural artefects. Almost analog like. Wish you played more with it from a sound perspective

[@monstur.official1719]

Have you tried KiloHearts' Slice EQ? It's very powerful, and very visually clear.

[@stansteez]

Somebody never heard of DMG EQuilibrium ;)

[@jsaulkane5893]

actually does come close to high end hardware.. bit hungry and so many set up optionts.. but yea amazing..

[@xaosnox]

Everything from DMG is amazing! Essence is probably the closest thing to a "desert island" plugin I've ever seen. Gonna have to play with EQuilibrium a bit more. Thanks for the reminder.

[@exootikkmusic]

To everyone who may read this I hope y'all make it, let's keep grinding 🙏🏽

[@thehigherupz2259]

Does it have the linear phase option for mastering?

[@tazzan-zs2ji]

pls review A.O.M tranQuilizr G2 one of the most beautiful sounding EQ!

[@peterheinen6110]

My goto duo: Waves R656 (awesome mid side) with Lindell TE100 (by Plugin Alliance, great musical sound). The TE100 looks big and slow, but it will amaze you. Do a review some time

[@nj1255]

MAAT thEQorange is king of the digital parametric eqs! Good review though as always!

[@aksdblaka]

the industry standard Pro-Q3 is only 30 bucks more expensive and it has dynamic eq+ external sidechain mode and better spectrum analyzer with pre/post/sidechain......with all that in mind, I think slate should at least go cheaper

[@kramdellakram7247]

Q3 ALL DAY EVERY DAY. this infinity eq is interesting but its a nerfed q. They both eq, they are just not equal. Q3 is better

[@elyot4010]

I told Steven Slate I was going to replace all of my Fabfilter EQs with Infinity and see what happens. Ok, you gave me the push. I have the all access pass, so I might as well get off my mental butt