Slater Designs "Sci-Fi 2.0" Surfboard Review by Noel Salas Ep.100

Where to Buy:
The Surf Station: www.surfstationstore.com/coll...
Surfboard Empire: (Aus & NZ Only) surfboardempire.com.au/collec...
Surf Ontario: (Canada Only) surfontario.ca/collections/sl...
In this episode I put the new Slater Designs “Sci-Fi 2.0” through the paces in 2-6’ Surf. My board testing started in 3-4’ surf that had some push and the Sci-Fi 2.0 did not disappoint.
The most notable changes for me in the Sci-Fi 2.0 from the Original Sci-Fi is the narrower tail with increased exit rocker, and 1” shorter in length. All three of these changes give the Sci-Fi 2.0 a high-performance upgrade in the pocket and extended the wave range to 3-8’ surf n a shorter package compared to the OG Sci-Fi.
A couple other changes to the Sci-Fi 2.0 that were not as noticeable to me is the wide point shoved forward, and increased depth of Tomo’s Quad Inside Single Concave for greater lift and responsiveness.
I found the Original Sci-Fi to be faster down the line in smaller mushy surf due to it having a wider tail with less rocker. If you loved the performance of your OG Sci-Fi, then you will be stoked on the upgrades with the 2.0.
These changes put the Sci-Fi 2.0 in the HPSB category, and I highly recommend it for intermediate - pro level surfers.
After reviewing a stock 5’6” and 5’5” in this review I liked the 5’6” better due to 1” more rail line to increase drive through turns and the extra float did not hinder performance or agility in tight transitions. If you are stuck choosing between two stock sizes…. I suggest the bigger one. The changes made in the Sci-Fi 2.0 make it very responsive and user friendly and the extra foam is your friend on this model.
No obligation, but these links & ads help support the site and keeps the reviews coming! If you decide to buy somewhere else or would like to support the show, please give at www.paypal.me/surfnshow
My Height: 5’9”
My Weight: 160 lb or 72.57 kg
Stock DIMS Tested:
5’5” x 18 3/8 x 2 ¼ (24.9L)
5’6” x 18 5/8 x 2 5/16 (26L)
Recommended Fins:
Thruster: Naked Viking Surf “Peregrine” (Pivot Fins)
Quad: Large Peregrine Side fins / Pyzel Medium Quad Rears.

[@goog646]

I like when you show yourself paddling into the waves. Thanks.

[@glug1977]

Great concise, smart, and honest review Noel- thanks for all you do! : )

[@jakeharpaz]

Had one demo session on this board, and knew it was the board I wanted to buy. Rode it on a 4ft punchy beach break here in Aus, and the thing felt super fast and responsive (magic). I demoed it in a 5'8, but decided to buy it in a 5'9 for extra length. Can't wait to surf it again.

[@DaHolyrllr]

You continue to provide valuable information and education for our community. Thanks for another excellent review. I’m really glad you decided to do the tutorials. Keep the awesome productions coming & we’re impatiently waiting for your tutorials ....LOL.

[@zenfiretrading3848]

8:17 was a beautiful ride, super jivey little check turn to open and then bam!

[@alzoid69]

Great review. Stoked for the tutorials!!

[@soulsurfer3102]

This is the best show everrrrrr

[@jorget4785]

Wow centennial episode!!! Good job Noel Salas. #100 and your teaming up with Carver. Moving in good direction.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

J T Cheers.. we are looking forward to adding theses “How to Surf Better” tutorials.

[@jorget4785]

I always watch your reviews, they are awesome. Maybe when all this COVID stuff is over you can make your way to Hawaii.

[@jasonsmith8929]

Good explaination of the differences. Well done.

[@adamwaz5615]

Nice review Noel 🤙

[@chebliss7665]

Thanks Noel, another great review... What are your thoughts about how this compares to the Cymatic? It seems like there's a lot of overlap in terms of performance and wave suitability...

[@ChadAtkinson]

Bought one today Noel. Looking forward to getting to know the board! Your review helped me make the decision. I had been looking at some other boards - CI Rocket 9, Cymatic - but felt like this was the next board for me to help progress my surfing

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Chad Atkinson Stoked for you... let me know how it goes

[@mikuo7258]

How did it go?

[@ChadAtkinson]

Really happy with it so far Have taken it out in 4-6ft+ beachbreak light offshore winds with heavy drops and quick rides 2-3ft pointbreak onshore winds with heaps of chop 3-4ft pointbreak offshore winds with peeling waves This board handled those variety of conditions well Plenty of paddle power and float. Good speed down the line and able to handle decent drops I’m only an intermediate surfer so I am hoping this is a board that I can grow with and develop

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Chad Atkinson Excellent!! Thanks for posting

[@surfdog306]

Aloha Noel, Love your KZbin channel. By far the best surfboard review channel out there!! So I just got the Sci-Fi 2.0 and from my first surf it feels awesome. In your review you tested Future Fins. What would you recommend in the FCS 2 fins. I rode the Fannings and it felt great. Just ordered the new H 4 so will see how that feels.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

surfdog306 I recommend the Reactors

[@shannonfrawley9097]

Great review thanks!.. looking at getting this to replace a Spintek OG Flyer (5,10) thinking this would be better in more and bigger conditions? I loved the sci fi 1 and the hydroshort. Cheers.

[@lexdang2551]

Would love your thoughts on this Noel!

[@DorianMediaGroup]

How is the Sci-Fi 2.0 with paddling into waves? Would Gamma be a better board for paddle speed?

[@ChadAtkinson]

Noel, I have been surfing the Sci Fi 2.0 for 3-4 weeks now, and love it as my daily driver How do you think the Sci Fi 2.0 would handle bigger, hollower surf? Head-high to double overhead etc I am wondering if the Sci Fi 2.0 will be able to handle the winter surf, or if I should add something more HPSB to my quiver eg Gamma or Ghost

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Chad Atkinson The Scifi 2 can handle the bigger surf if you don’t mind riding EPS in double overhead. I think the SciFi 2 will go better than the Gamma but if I had to choose out of the 3 boards you mentioned for double overhead waves then I choose the Ghost

[@erikburkett4366]

with the tail/rocker changes, my impression is a Cymatic with a pointy nose. Would've liked a direct comparison between those two and any difference in how they surf.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Erik Burkett The SciFi 2.0 has more tail rocker compared to the Cymatic. With that being said the Cymatic needs less of a wave to go good as it carries more speed. The SciFi 2.0 Is legit HPSB and due to it having more rocker... I would say it makes the Cymatic more of a Daily Driver if I wanted them both in my quiver.

[@imranesack1560]

Hi Noel. Which daily driver would you reckon is as loose as the sci-fi? I’m looking a look daily driver that’s easy to pivot. Thank you 🙏

[@alexlerner7964]

I want to get a new board but im stuck on which to get. So far my list of choices are Driver 2.0, Fever, HT2 Sharp eye, Pyzel shadow, Pyzalien, Sci fi 2.0 or the pyzel ghost as a step up. I mostly surf waves from 3-8 but every once an a while I will get a day thats 8+. What would you recommend. I live on oahu btw.

[@justinlins4720]

Good stuff 🤙🏼🤙🏼🤙🏼

[@casquete13]

What board do you prefer between Sci fi 2 or Dominator 2? I had the Sci fi 1 in 5,9" 29L and I love it, I had the dominator 1 5'6 28 L and was not enough performance and I had to sell... But now the new version I thought that can be moe performance and may be with more range of sizes waves... Thanks for your support!!!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The SciFi 2 offers more high performance surfing but I personally liked the D2 way better for the waves I surf

[@dkilla01]

this board is sick, it def likes a rounder wave though

[@nathanliddicoat1077]

Hey, I am wondering what length I should get. I am 5’9 intermediate to advanced and get 3-5ft waves often what do u think would be ideal?

[@jackgriffin1601]

Hi quick question, I know you have already answered a lot about cymatic v sci fi 2 but I have a 5’7 evo and 6’3 ghost and looking for something between that is a kind of daily driver between those 2 boards. I surfed a 5’8 cymatic and found it too small for my ability...so I’m wondering between a 5’9 cymatic and sci fi 2 for that 4/5 ft good surf that best compliments those other boards?

[@nicklewdor1290]

Getting mine tomorrow 👏

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

🔥

[@chrispascual7896]

This made me want to buy the one ASAP. I’ve been on the Mayhem train and as much as I love Lost boards the price of the sci-fi 2.0 is to unbeatable. Also can’t wait for the new series of vids that look like to be carver surfskate training.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Chris Pascual Yewww!! Working on the Tutorials now

[@towdjumper5]

Just bought one can’t wait .

[@MrB1019]

How did it go for you did you like?

[@towdjumper5]

The sessions’ were on point with these boards my friend. I bought two more. .. I wanted two with the FCS Fin box systems and one with the Futures Fin box, to see if there was much of a difference. Your video sold me on these boards.Teaching my wife to surf now here at New Smyrna inlet. Great stuff Noel!!!Thanks for the great videos.

[@troykong8903]

Hey Noel! What daily driver/hpsb board would you recommend on average conditions for Southern California if surfing at places like trestles or t-street? I recently saw your review on the pyzalien 2 and I’m super interested in it but what about other similar models like the og flyer, driver 2.0?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Troy Kong P2 is epic... I also like the Driver 2.0, NB2, UBer Driver XL. Go to our website to see more... www.surfnshow.com

[@leilanikaiawelacuesta7771]

Aloha Noel! I have the OG Sci-Fi @ 5'9'' 29L and it goes great at my local in 2-4 sloppy summer conditions with its wider tail, but also maintains performance in the wintertime when it's overhead. It's now time to replace that board and I'm between sizes with the updated 2.0 version being that it has a pulled in tail. Would you recommend maintaining a 5' 9'', which is now 30L (I'm leaning towards this) or move down to a 5'8'' and keep the 29L? Your input is always spot on, I look forward to hearing from you. Mahalo

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The 2.0 is good… but the wider OG Carries a bit more speed. If this is for the same waves you are describing you might want to go 5’9”. How much do you weigh?

[@leighwilson1524]

Hi Noel, I just had another look at your Cymatic review. On the Cymatic you looked quicker and it looked less effort to manoeuvre than the Sci-Fi 2.0. Did you feel that way?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Leigh Wilson Yup... Cymatic is my Favorite board in the Slater Designs line up. Quick rail to rail and epic in the pocket with very little effort. Cheers

[@xabierxabi2199]

Great review, the comparation with the sci-fi 1 is wowwww. For a guy that is 6’2 and 180 lbs there are no stock dims. FireWire would start makeing more options in this tipe of boards, like in gamma model.

[@ndub6021]

Height doesn't matter at all, it's all about volume. Just because you're 6'2 doesn't mean you can't ride a 5'8. Find the right volume for your weight and go from there.

[@Chopper650]

Height affects stance

[@matr4724]

@@Chopper650 im 6 2 and my stance is much better on a short board, i surf my 5'8 so much better than my 6'0 6'1

[@matr4724]

However I feel more comfortable on a 6'1 6'2 in over head surf

[@davidiseri539]

Another epic review!!!! Thanks for the review. For an average day at lowers what board would you prefer to ride the Seaside or SciFi 2.0?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

David Iseri 1-3’ Seaside, 3-5’ SciFi 2.0

[@changingphysiques]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 OK noel, 3-5 ft scifi 2.0 or cymatic

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Chris You can always refer to our website and see what boards made my Favorites list. The Cymatic is a Favorite of mine and the SciFi 2.0 is not. The SciFi 2.0 changes are most definitely an upgrade from the OG SciFi for more HPSB surfing. However the Cymatic is faster and still out performs the SciFi 2.0 in my opinion.

[@simonprono4604]

Thanks mate for this review ! I hesitate between the 5"7 and the 5"8 ? Any advices for me ?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Simon Prono Go 5’8”... this is a legit HPSB so ride it in good waves.

[@vznquest]

been planning on the original for a while but...oh no, another board to complicate my decision! curious as to how low you think i should go...been riding a 34.5L 6' SC Pumpkin Seed for 10 years (no joke) and due for an upgrade! i'm 6'1" 170 and still improving at age 38. i'd like to get a bit more radical but still be able to catch and rip small waves. what would you go with if you were me? PS i rode a 5'11" Activator for several years and loved that in good waves. ps your reviews are the best.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

J Quest Liters I recommend the Liters below for a surfer your weight. For all other weights please use this formula for Guidance. Take your weight in pounds and divide by 6. This guys weight is 170 lb... so divide that by 6 = (28.33L) Now look at my adjustments according to skill levels. Each level has a range... adjust according to how responsive you want your board to be and how hard you want work paddling etc. If you are not sure what your skill level is then error on the higher Volume wise according to your skill level. Expert Level = 27-28.5 Advanced = 29-30 Intermediate = 31-33 Beginner/Intermediate = 34-35

[@scottdouglas8619]

Cheers Noel! Epic review bro. I’ve been riding the sci fi 1 for a while at 5’9 from here in New Zealand to Bali and it works for me in 2-6 foot but mostly using it in 3-4foot. Originally I bought a 5’10 but that 1 inch made it feel like a boat. I’m keen as heck on a sci fi 2.0 at 5’9 but unsure if that will emulate that original 5’10 feel on the sci fi 1. After that same fluid, easy duck dive and speedy feel but love the idea of volume purely for paddle ease. Thoughts?? Pretty intermediate surfer and I’ll be using it from beach breaks to the odd point break. 173cm - 74/75kgs

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I think your liter range varies from 30-32

[@scottdouglas8619]

Surf n Show Reviews thanks for the above reply. Seeing as the sci fi 1 (5’9) was 29.2L and the sci fi 2 comes in at 30.4L was wondering what your thoughts were. Just noticed you mentioned that you preferred the 5’6 in both 1.0 and 2.0 - any major difference in feel?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@scottdouglas8619 I like a shorter board in general.... more maneuverability in the pocket in 3-5’

[@mtb_3930]

I have exactly the same dilemma as you man. 5 9 original amazing, 5 10 original terrible board. Bizzare. So which size for the 2.0?? 5 8 or 5 9?

[@scottdouglas8619]

@@mtb_3930 I went for the 5’8 and it’s all good when up and riding but I’d go the 5’9 if I buy another purely for foam

[@dkilla01]

Hey 👋 Noel, how have you been? Good 🤞 I hope. Quick question for you, if you could have any board on the FireWire stock list, which would it be? Why? Cymatic?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Cymatic is quick rail to rail and loves vertical surfing. It just suits my style and I really liked the way it surfs.

[@franciscoborges2987]

Hi Noel! What is your opinion between the No Brainer and the Sci fi 2.0? I´m an intermediate surfer and I surf 2-6 foot waves in the middle of mushy and hollow. What do you think could be better for me, knowing that I have a JS Monsta 8 at 5'9 24,9L? Thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Francisco Borges SciFi 2.0 will go better.... the NB is a Groveler best in 1-2’ mushy waves. Have a look at the Cymatic... epic board. The SciFi 2.0 is a HPSB and you already have a Monsta 8.... try something a little different.

[@kenkohncke7929]

Hi Noel, Thanks for another great review! A bit disappointed not to see a comparison to the Cymatic. I layed them side by side at my local shop and to me it looked as if the SciFi 2 is just a Cymatic with a pointy nose. The rockers looked the same to me. To the naked eye at least. What do you think? Did FW tell you how the two differ? BTW. I now own a Cymatic, haven,t had it in the water yet however. Looking fwd to it though! Your review was helpful in choosing that board, so thanks.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Ken Kohncke The SciFi 2.0 has more rocker compared to the Cymatic... according to my conversation with Tomo.

[@dingdonghello1131]

I recieved a new cymatic 5'5" yesterday and surfed it today in solid 3-4ft. Setup as Noel recommends, performers with reactor quad rears. Goes fast, holds well and turns on a dime. Amazing so far. I also have a 5'5" Omni and you can notice the difference in the way they surf. Both are good.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Ding Dong Hello Epic... thanks for posting!

[@changingphysiques]

@@dingdonghello1131 in large or medium

[@dingdonghello1131]

@@changingphysiques Hi Chris. It was a tough decision but seeing that I only weigh 142 lbs I went with medium. Just gets better with every surf.

[@basetalk3306]

I currently surf a Channel Islands 6’2 sampler with 37.5 L, I’m 6’0 and 180lbs for a break like Huntington would you recommend the sci fi 2.0 at 6’2 with 38.8L or 6’1 with 37.1L or should I get a glazer at 5’11 with 37l, I’d say I’m about at a intermediate- beginner skill level,leaning more towards intermediate

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Jesus Obeso 5’11” Glazer sounds good for u

[@louisalexandre4589]

Hi Noel, thanks for the review ! I currently surf the 5'7 sci fi OG and i love it. I wanna go on 2.0 now but not sure between 5'6 or 5'7.... (I'm 1m77, 71kg, level intermédiate/advanced). What do you suggest ? I know that 5'6 would be ok but 5'7 volume seems to be helpful.. thanks ;)

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Please tell me how tall you are in feet and inches and your weight in pounds. You can Google the conversion. Then I can answer your question

[@louisalexandre4589]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 156lbs X 5'8 thanks ;)

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@louisalexandre4589 My liter range for you at different skill levels for your weight look like this. Pro/Expert = 25-27L Advanced 27-29L Intermediate = 30-32L Pick the 2.0 that best fits your liter range. If like a little more rail line then get the longer one if it’s in your liter range.

[@NCsurfer607]

What fcs 2 fins would you recommend for the sci-fi 2.0 thruster and quad?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Brett Weeks Quad = Large Reactor side with Medium Reactor rears. Thruster= Medium Al Merrick or Medium Kolohe’s.

[@gelateriabuffel4513]

Hi Noel, how do you compare Sci fi 2.0 with JS Monsta box? Thanks in advance

[@poppiiiii]

Good question, would like to know too for everyday surf. from a design perspective looks like the 2.0 would be faster and easier to surf , geared towards smaller surf BUT sometimes you get surprised, monstabox has such a good reputation to be ridden in everything

[@ponolife5088]

Question for you Noel. I ride a 6'4 Rocket Wide in smaller surf and also have a 6'4 Cymatic. Looking to fill the gap in-between to my next board up which is the 6'8 Houdini. I'm thinking 6'6 Swordfish or 6'4 Sci-Fi 2.0. Any suggestions? Thank you

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Pono Life Swordfish is more of a small wave board similar to your RW. The SciFi 2.0 is a HPSB best in 3-6’+.

[@ponolife5088]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks Noel. That's about where my thinking was. Mahalo. Ian

[@mtb_3930]

Hi noah. I had the OG SCI Fi in 5 9 which I loved. I tried the 5 10 it was very different I didn't like it. For the 2.0 I see you say you can go up a size so would i get the 5 9 in the 2.0 also? Ie ordinarily it would be 5 8 as you ride it one inch shorter but going up one means back to the 5 9. Hope this makes sense.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Get similar volume to the OG SciFi.

[@brutismaximus1]

I thought the first minute 30 was KS! LOL

[@theoverstoker3430]

Sick!!!!!!!

[@scottcuttre9705]

So week mushy slow NJ waves, the original sci fi would be a better buy than the 2.0? If so, I prefer 3 fin rather than quad which is better?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The first SciFi is faster and I recommend that one over the SciFi 2.

[@mufflaps]

Yo Noel! I’m currently surfing a 5’8 neck beard 2 28.6l. I’m 5’9 and 175lbs think this board may be a little big but am looking at buying a board for bigger waves... what size and model would you recommend? I’m intermediate level but getting better all time due to surfing every spare moment I get 🤙🏄‍♂️

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

cal searson Liters on your NB2 sound about right.. that should be on the low side for your weight and skill level. Maybe change up your fins a little. If the board is feeling sluggish from turn to turn then try a more pivotal fin. That NB2 is mental in 1-4’ surf... for 4-8’ surf I recommend a HPSB like SciFi 2.0, Driver 2.0, Fever. These HPSB have more rocker and offer better traction when the waves get fast and powerful.

[@mufflaps]

Surf n Show Reviews thanks dude appreciate the info, just one other thing... would you typically increase/decrease volume from everyday driver to hpsb? Or pretty much keep volume the same?? Again thanks for the info. Legend! 🤙

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

cal searson Keep it the same

[@aleangelomoraes]

Hi Noel, I’m using the sci-fi 5’7 26.3L do you think would be better to ride the sci-fi 2.0 5’6 26L? I also bought the Cymatic 5’4 and I’m loving the board, thank you 🙏🏼

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Alexandre Moraes L I suggest similar liters to your Cymatic and OG SciFi

[@zenfiretrading3848]

That's good to know that those peregrine apex fins are K2.1/WCT template clones. I feel like those 2 fin sets are hard to find. But wernt the K2.1/WCT always honeycomb fins? And you said the peregrine's were fiberglass?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Zenfire Trading Yes the NVS Peregrine’s are fiberglass with epoxy resin. The quality of NVS is epic and I like their Apex Series more compared to Honeycomb. Better consistency and more predictable but a bit heavier.

[@alang253]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 I know you did an NVS video but it mostly focused on the C-drive fin. I think there is potential for a video about the apex series for a lot of us because of the construction and unique approach to foiling/reducing drag. Been stalking your reviews picking up bits and pieces about your thoughts on apex. I even have the peregrines and love them but I'd like to know what you think about the stiffness for smaller/mushier waves that we typically get in So Cal. Especially since I'm 140 lbs these fins seem to defy your traditional recommendation for a flexy speed generating fin...

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Alan Galura I’ve been loving my NVS fins in Apex construction in small surf even though they offer little to no flex. I am getting that twang or pop out of my EPS boards and enjoying the consistency and predictability of the Fiberglass Apex construction in my turns.

[@alang253]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Gotcha thanks for the reply. My boards are all PU so that pop will have to come from me... The apex series has so much 'clarity' while all my honeycombs feel muddy in comparison now.

[@jessejosephsolvason2599]

Was it tough to put this in the HPSB category vs daily driver? I'm trying to choose between a used pyzel phantom and used SF 2.0. I dont really go out if its bigger than 6 feet. I feel like based on your reviews, the phantom might be a better choice given smaller waves and a smaller quiver?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Phantom is more user friendly and Carrie’s more speed do to it having less rocker

[@josephsolvason6535]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks!!

[@davidalmeida9454]

Nice Noel !!! which one you prefer Cymatic or this new Sci Fi 2.0 ? thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

David Almeida as a daily driver / HPSB I would choose the Cymatic. If I were surfing a hollow wave or bigger surf then I would choose the the SciFi 2.0. It has more rocker so it will offer more hold in bigger surf compared to Cymatic.

[@davidalmeida9454]

great ... thanks Noel

[@SurfRinseRepeat]

I'm not sure if that is Noel or Kelly by the way of how good the surfing is!

[@kilima1500]

Hey Noel!! I love the work you do and I encourage you to continue doing these reviews for the surfing community. I know that the review came out a while ago but I would like you to help me. I doubt between 5.9 30.6L or 5.10 32.2L. I usually go with a cabianca 5.11 31L and I weigh 165 pounds and my level is intermediate. I don't know whether to adjust the volume with the 5.9 or gain rail length with the 5.10 and lose performance. Hope you could read it. Best regards

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

How tall are you?

[@kilima1500]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Im 5,9 Noel. I normally surf north Spain beach breaks and Hossegor small days

[@kilima1500]

Im 5,9 Noel. I normally surf north Spain punchy beach breaks and Hossegor small days!!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@kilima1500 the 5’9” might feel to short and twitchy compared to your 5’11”. If your surfing mostly punchy hollow Beachies then go 5’10. It might feel a little more buoyant but you need to get into hollow waves quicker to set your rail and pick your line. I am concerned the 5’9” will get you in a bit late and hard for you to set your rail.

[@changingphysiques]

Hi Noel, In the original review you said you preferred the cymatic to the Scifi. What's you opinion on the 2.0 now vs the cymatic

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Chris For where I surf I still like the Cymatic better. The changes in the SciFi 2.0 are definitely an upgrade from the OG SciFi from my perspective. Making it 1” shorter and the changes in the tail give it the HPSB edge in good waves for sure.

[@changingphysiques]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks noel 🤙

[@changingphysiques]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 sorry noel, I'm 78kg, what was the quad set up

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Chris Large Pivot side fins with Medium Pivot Quad Rears.

[@mentored2millions840]

Thanks for the great content this video help me buy a sci fi 2.0 . I notice you have a rack you display your boards on. What model is it? Thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Get it at this link. Tell them I sent you boardraxx.com/

[@mentored2millions840]

Will do thanks for the prompt reply

[@emick3326]

Congrats on the sponsor from Carver!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Looking forward to working on these "How to Surf Better" tutorials this Summer and we are stoked Carver jumped on board with us.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

antonio collazo Cheers... I hope to communicate what I’ve learned about surfing to better for myself, and to our Community. Stay tuned

[@D.ReyBeats818]

Already have a Cymatic and love it. Any reason to get the sci-fi 2.0???

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Drew Reynado Nope.... The Cymatic is better and these two boards have to much overlap on wave height. I suggest keeping your Cymatic and get something fun to shred like the Seaside or Fishbeard

[@bellpaleale]

I was just going to ask the same question!

[@SurfMastery-kz6je]

i catch most waves 2-5 on a 8ft soft top. Picked up this board in 6'6, at 45.8 L, while im 6'1. 185lbs, what are some of the differences i should be aware of? Going to have to duck dive for first time

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Anonymous It’s going to be very loose and hard to get up on and control compared to your soft top.

[@SurfMastery-kz6je]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks

[@SurfMastery-kz6je]

Surf n Show Reviews so if Im gonna be in crumby 2-3 Malibu surf today, where waves have little power, my takeoff should be much later, and shouldn’t have to worry nose dive if keep back foot weight since shorter board and more rocker. Taking backup soft top. This is a step down until my 6’2 hydra is repaired- which is a better everyday board than this one. This seems to more appropriate for giver waves- 5-8, likes you said. Don’t need reply just thinking out loud here

[@martinwajda]

Hey Noel, great review as always, how would you compare performance wise, the Sci-Fi 2.0 to the Cymatic? Also any plans on doing a review on the El Tomo Fish?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

martinwajda SciFi 2.0 has more tail rocker compared to Cymatic. It’s a bit more high performance... Still waiting for boards on the El Tomo Fish

[@martinwajda]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks Noel, I am looking forward to it, looks like a nice board.

[@MichaelJDay]

@Noel If you could only choose one, which board would it be for your daily driver? Cymatic or Sci Fi 2.0?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Cymatic by a mile

[@MichaelJDay]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 what characteristics do you like more in the Cymatic versus the Sci Fi 2.0 ? Wish I could find a SciFi 2.0 in Portugal to test before deciding to size up in the Cymatic versus purchasing a Sci Fi 2.0. I know the Cymatic and love it, just need more volume.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@MichaelJDay The Cymatic offers high performance surfing in the pocket quicker. No need for the extra length in the SciFi 2.9 with the pointed nose… Cymatic is way better in my book. The SciFi 2.0 is average at best

[@MichaelJDay]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thank you Noel! You're definitely helping me make the right decision.

[@Toades8513]

Can you do the Something Fishy board? By Gerry Lopez plz

[@100mwaterproof]

Hi Noel, curious if you had to choose only one board as your favourite out of NB2 (Spinetec) or Cymatic (LFT)? And what kind of waves do you routinely surf (size, quality, shape etc.) Thanks in advance :)

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

David I surf 1-4’ surf 90% of the time so my Favorite pick would be NB2 The Cymatic is best in 3-6’-+.

[@100mwaterproof]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 great, thanks for that! I'm a taller surfer (6'1, 80kg) and noticed the Slater designs are very short relative to my usual volume (29 litres) where as the NB2 allows for custom sizing so I'm leaning more towards the NB2. Cheers.

[@annettepeter2969]

Great review, as always! Would you suggest this board for a low intermediate level, to be used in glassy conditions ( let's say Bali, Maldives....) head to slightly overhead conditions? At the moment I use Hypto Krypto 6.2 38,4 lt for those conditions, and I feel good. I was thinking about the Sci Fi 6.2 at 38,9 lt. I'm 6.2, 200lbs. Thanks in advance! Alex

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Annette peter Yes, it will go good and offer a bit more performance too. Quicker rail to rail, it will feel lose, responsive, and quick.

[@alessandropeter17]

Thank you Noel. What do you suggest regarding fins? At the moment my futures fin quiver is Blacksticks 5 fins Large and F-series eight thruster. Thanks again

[@stolkkj]

Another solid review Noel! This board looks fun! I’m thinking about getting this board in the 5,6 at 26L (my size and weight are similar to yours, my skill level maybe slightly above intermediate) in the new I-Bolic technology. I want to take it to the Mentawais this summer, but not entirely sure if this board can handle the 6-7 foot surf there? (The other board I take is the Dominator 2). It supposed to be made for better, more hollow waves but I’m more concerned that 5,6 might be too small for any surf above 6 foot (maybe with a large slightly raked fin template?). Do you agree with this? But besides this trip I mostly surf 3-5 foot beach breaks. So I am thinking to get this board or the inferno FT.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Go Inferno F T. It can shred all those waves sizes way better… especially the bigger surf. We will drop the Inferno F T review next Monday. Board is 🔥

[@stolkkj]

Thanks Noel! Appreciated! Looking forward to your review. Heard the durability of Dark Arts isn’t so super great though.

[@stolkkj]

​@@surfnshowreviews7777 The FT seems to be impossible to get in C1Carbon at the moment (in Europe), I would only be able to get my hands on one end of summer. Would you say that the inferno 72 in C1Carbon would be a good alternative for the FT or would the Sci-Fi 2.0 or FRK+ in I-Bolic be a better alternative. Looking for a board to compliment my Dominator 2, something I can surf in 3-7ft when the waves get a bit better/steeper.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@stolkkj Go I72

[@luccapires7121]

Noel If im 5'9 if i was to get the 5'6 would that help out on smaller waves while still making it high performance on all days.

[@luccapires7121]

Correction I am 5'9

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@luccapires7121 How much do you weigh and what is skill level.

[@CrankyMankey]

Looking forward to your surfskate tutorials! How would you describe the difference betweent this board and the hydroshort?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Jeromel Domingo This SciFi 2.0 has more tail rocker... more performance in the pocket...

[@haydencarranza170]

this was the platform for my middle school news same song same editing😭

[@shannonessers1723]

Yessss!!!!!

[@narayanaproductions9991]

Thanks for the great reviews. I am usually surfing 32 l like a lot the 32.5L range, but was wondering if I shall hit the 5'11 all the way to 33.8 L, which would be too much usually. But looking at the dims it s not too wide, just a bit hesitant if it would not be too beefy and stick to the 5'10 with 32.2L which is the clothet to my favorite range. I must say that I have a step up that hits 33+L and that for grovelers I rather be over 33 as well(for mediocre conditions). right now having fun on my neckBEard 1 at 32.5L. What would you recommend ?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Tough call… the 5’11” at 33.8L will float more like 34.3L due to eps/epoxy construction. The 5’10” sounds more like it at 32.2L floating more like 32.7L. I would hate for the FE at 5’11” be to big for you. The 5’10” will go good with Twin + Trailer and a bit hypersensitive purely as a Twin. I suggest a good size Twin Fin template to shred it without a stabilizer fin. Check out my HP Twins here…. www.shopsurfnshow.com/collections/all/products/twin-fins-hp-twins

[@narayanaproductions9991]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thank you for the quick reply! I have not mentioned that I ve been surfing only epoxy boards for years, because I would damage Pu boards in 2/3 months. So 32.7 l is on an epoxy board. Yes the fins seem sick I ve been watching your videos testing, I’ ll grab them for sure. I guess I will go for the 5’10, actually I have been surfing the SF 1.0 at 29.9 L for a year but was missing some foam, so the 32.2L seems like a good guess.🙏

[@Dinoago]

@@narayanaproductions9991 Whats your weight and height?

[@narayanaproductions9991]

@@Dinoago I am 6'30 190 , 1m90 86 kg

[@scottcuttre9705]

Hey Noel someone told me that the sci fi 2.0 is way better than the mash up in smaller waves. Do you agree with that?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Nope… not for me

[@christopherhewitt9091]

Sci Fi or DM 2?

[@soulsurfer3102]

Heloo champ.my friend is surf 5.9 153pound. What volum he meed ti take this board? Thanks

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Pro/Exp 24-26L Advanced = 26-28L Intermediate = 29-31L

[@soulsurfer3102]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks

[@sergioleon7771]

Noel i still think nb2 is your all time fav

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

The NB2 is one of my all time Favorites for sure. Cheers

[@sergioleon7771]

Congrats bro

[@scottcuttre9705]

Also on the smaller waves it looks like your working really hard to catch the waves. Can u talk about that because that’s what I’ll be riding

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

I would not choose either of the SciFi’s for weak mushy waves. I would go Dominator 2.... paddles better and it’s faster.

[@scottcuttre9705]

Thanks so much Noel. what do you think of the Rusty Blade for the everyday smaller conditions here in NJ

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@scottcuttre9705 Sorry... never seen that board or tried one before

[@rollopost]

loved my sci fi 1.0 until it got rail cancer - late entries, fast as hell, too fast, needed to be pulled in and rockered - looks like they fixed that, bat tail is a bit weird and harder to fix. would be a great board with a squash tail.

[@McGoo165]

wats a better all rounder the hydroshort or the sci fi 2.o?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

McGoo165 Hydroshort is a better daily driver and more user friendly

[@gabrielaankrah2371]

is this a good beginner board?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Gabriela Ankrah Not really. I say get a long board or maybe the biggest Seaside. Longboards are the easiest to learn on then go shorter

[@tardigrader88]

How would the futures F4 Blackstix go?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Noah Baird That’s a Small fin... no drive or hold... probably not much speed for a guy my size.

[@tardigrader88]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 how would the neutral template go

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Noah Baird Pretty good

[@dkilla01]

how come this board didn't make the favorite's list? What didn't you like about it?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

It needs a bit of a wave to go good due to having more rocker. I feel like I have to work harder to generate speed compared to the first SciFi. The SciFi 2 goes good but I like HPSB’s that offer quick get up and go speed.

[@sweetpotato6218]

What is the best board you have ever surfed?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Sweet Potato For what size waves? What type of board? Sorry your question is to vague for me.

[@sweetpotato6218]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Short board for 3-6 waves.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Sweet Potato Lost Driver 2.0

[@sweetpotato6218]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 Thanks!! Love your show. Keep up the good work.

[@boltup5566]

Step 1: surf a wave as good as lowers every day. Lol.

[@bradwalker4762]

Was about to type the same comment. He surfs exactly the same on every board he tests. It's nothing to do with the boards.

[@mattandrews808]

Go back to the valley

[@foxgd9117]

@@bradwalker4762 actually is but he only rides better than local brands

[@SC-se4mi]

hi noel, sci fi 2.0 or hydroshort? im undecided...

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

S C SciFi 2.0

[@tomdavid3876]

More x factor for pyzalien2?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Tom David P2 is a 1board quiver/ Daily Driver... this SciFi 2.0 is a HPSB so it will offer more performance in the pocket due to more rocker and narrower tail

[@dubbs1923]

Surf n Show Reviews which model can handle the bigger wave though? P2 or SP2?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

wef 0909 Good question... I would ride them both in 8’ surf then switch to a mini step up.

[@tomdavid3876]

Not a favorite as far as hpsb goes for you?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Tom David It’s good but not a Favorite. The upgrades on the SciFi 2.0 are definitely an upgrade from the OG SciFi for me.

[@RBNK157]

Sci fi 2.0 vs Dominator 2.0 ?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Dominator 2

[@RBNK157]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 one or two reasons you like it better ?

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@RBNK157 It’s faster, more flow, faster rail to rail, easier to shred… more user friendly and grovels better if you need too.

[@RBNK157]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 as usual you’re the best ! For me beginner-intermediate 160lbs 6’2 31-33 liters sounds good? (Should I replace my RW with this one ?) Thank you for any additional help!

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

@@RBNK157 The RW is epic too.

[@ironphil62]

I have one question if you are going to talk about litres in a surfboard You Need to then talk the weight of Kilos in the surfer riding it, then.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

ironphil62 How about you look up Kilos to pounds and do some work on your side. That will really help me out....

[@ironphil62]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 all good it's 2.2 pounds equals a kilo (great review) But all my surfboards are hand shaped by Sam Egan not machined shaped so litres do not come into the equation for me "I just can't concur" - I go by measurements in a surfboard not litres. And Yes Kelly Slater is the greatest of all time.

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

ironphil62 Sorry to hear that... I don’t have answers for you when shapers only use measurements. That’s something you need to figure out.

[@ironphil62]

@@surfnshowreviews7777 I'm old school I prefer a hand shaped surfboard over a machined it will be a sad day when Sam Egan steps down he's like 77yo already.

[@otiliorodriguez6753]

Sci-fi + helium = 🤯🤯

[@bodhitree33]

I second this motion.

[@otiliorodriguez6753]

Me too 🤙

[@schneids3861]

imma tell my kids this was kelly slater

[@dkilla01]

The board has a secret can of nitrous in overhead waves

[@alexlerner7964]

Sci fi 2.0 or FRK

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Fever or Driver 2.0

[@graphicsking1893]

I thought this was Slater surfing at first... thought, "wow - he's slowing down in his old age"... then I see its not Slater. Lowers does make everything better.

[@chrisdale4509]

M

[@bonsummers2657]

a 45 second intro? I don't like that

[@surfnshowreviews7777]

Bon Summers Skip it then....