This makes absolutely zero sense as an excerpt. It's like joining a Christopher Nolan film halfway through.
@farrider3339 Жыл бұрын
Hell, the sense is what you want ? A meaning ? A background where to build upon idiotic interpretation's ? Meaning is for weenies, I claim.
@yayo0 Жыл бұрын
if you are not well read on philosophy you obviously will not understand his references.
@lucasfabisiak9586 Жыл бұрын
@@yayo0 Please enlighten us, professor.
@ramdas363 Жыл бұрын
@@lucasfabisiak9586 To Be Fair, You Have To Have a Very High IQ to Understand Zizek...
@welearntoday9 ай бұрын
@@lucasfabisiak9586 for once he already explains this and builds more on it in the very beginning of his book "Less Than Nothing." Now, this is particularly is more of a classic zizek being zizek, just humour, although it does tie down and give nuance to following ideas in the introduction and later in the book as well so that's that. Also comparing Zizek to Christopher Nolan is like comparing Lacan to Michael Bay, very wrong, totally different types of incoherence are at play
@NeoRoman1453 Жыл бұрын
"Idiocracy" was never meant to be a documentary, but here we are!
@zestyfg10 ай бұрын
Then we have the parrots who never muster up the courage to speak themselves, but simply repeat what others have said before them with the assuring certainty that their (but actually someone else’s) statement has been pre-approved by the masses.
@NeoRoman145310 ай бұрын
@@zestyfg I wholeheartedly agree 👍 😊
@noa739917 күн бұрын
@@zestyfg didn't you listen? These are morons
@MrSchmouz Жыл бұрын
the grasp-the-snot frequency is staggering... might this be the connection to the many mysterious stains he's got on his t-shirt usually?
@georgepantzikis7988 Жыл бұрын
@Mike Fuller How many IQ points were you off by?
@richmason5152 Жыл бұрын
@1:17 "Wittgenstein"
@mokwatiramphisa4137 Жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@nejzk20264 ай бұрын
from all the people Slavok Zizek is expert in stupidity
@farrider3339 Жыл бұрын
Three level's of hysterical babbling menace's - good, I claim ! Important to have these definitions. Now, where shall we put these ? Btw idiocracy has taken over anyway, so let the rudder go and drift along without hurting the water 😊
@omarlerouge5420 Жыл бұрын
don't forget the "stooopid" level these days
@AnyaSheven Жыл бұрын
what was this Kafka and Judaism comparison, I honestly didn't get it, and it was a mess of an explanation.... anyone? 😹
@lucasfabisiak9586 Жыл бұрын
If I understand him correctly, Zizek is saying that although Kafka was certainly aware of his Jewishness, he did not explicitly incorporate it into his work.
@mariettestabel275 Жыл бұрын
🤣 we are all stupid
@collaborativedataaccounts324910 ай бұрын
@@lucasfabisiak9586 He did though, unconsciously. You cannot separate Kafka from his Jewishness or his Jew-as-outsider outlook on the world.
@lucasfabisiak95869 ай бұрын
@@collaborativedataaccounts3249Thank you for clarifying what "explicitly" means.
@CeramicShot9 ай бұрын
@@collaborativedataaccounts3249 I think he incorporated his Jewishness both unconsciously and consciously (read "Jackals and Arabs" for a conscious example), but never explicitly in his fiction. Inexplicit and unconscious aren't mutually exclusive.
@sumitrashankarchamoli85474 ай бұрын
As usual , he is provocative, but may not be as profound as he seems to be by his hegelian speaking style .
@H.C.J. Жыл бұрын
Remember that Hegel is the reason why the structure of german literature is so overly intellectual to the point where we generate people that talk a whole lot who say a whole lot of nothing like Zizek 😊
@hss1266110 ай бұрын
What does Zizek have to do with German literature?
@Vifnis5 ай бұрын
"we generate people that talk a whole lot who say a whole lot of nothing" Sorry, sir! I'll remember to speak in pure logic like a true Englishmen who follows Russel & Whitehead would!
@etfreak4 ай бұрын
i understand what he's saying he just usually goes on tangents and talks a lot