SNAP/NMAT/CMAT Critical Reasoning #06 I SNAP/NMAT/CMAT Score Booster Series by Anil Sir

[@abhinavverma429]

thank you sir this session was really helpful

[@SouravKuamr-d4b]

Let me tell thankyou sir .. not only this year CR videos but also ur previous year videos helped me a lot ... and please believe me you are the only reason that i can think like you and getting accuracy day by day .. true teacher

[@anilchoudhary4766]

That's nice. Thanks a ton bhai

[@anilchoudhary4766]

That's nice. Thanks a ton bhai

[@imonsanyal]

I`ve got my SNAP exam in 3hours and I wanna say that my CR has improved solely by watching your videos! Thank you for your dedication Anil Sir!

[@acecatbyicon]

@@imonsanyal Great. All the best

[@sahilbalmiki813]

Great explanation sir 😀🔥🔥. Amazing class 😄👏

[@PANYAMSAIADITYA]

Sir question 6 Mumbai ka pollution ka answer E hoga ye question Mera mock mey aaya tha meney either mark Kiya tha they mentioned that they are strong on their own ways esa likha tha

[@shivamvermaaaa]

Thank you sir!

[@Whatth199]

Amazing session sir, Thank you!

[@puneetaggarwal_]

Really helpful, Thank you Sir

[@nivanpandya6763]

In 11 the statement says “ only book which focuses its attention to the problem pf poverty in INDIA” and it give reasons and assessment pf the problems but the conclusion 2 stated as “the book deal with poverty” which is usually a wider term according to me. So i think of option D as correct answer. 😊

[@diyamallick2917]

Want session on strong nd weak arguments nd inference also . Ur teaching style is amazing 🌸

[@dalesteyn-e5k]

good set of questions

[@ishitaagrawal4105]

Hello sir, i can't find binary logic - critical reasoning video

[@shivamjuneja9760]

Sir, Kindly make videos on strengthening or weakening the argument as well as on inference. Love your work btw! Thank you for such good work

[@finsquad3026]

Please turn on Downloads.

[@ayushsinghchauhan9558]

sir in statement 5, either 1 or 3 would be implicit along with 2 because original statement is that "to come out of our financial crisis" it doesn't neccesarily mean bailing, a lot of times 2 companies having financial crisis do merge or deal as a last resort in hopes of helping each other by combining strengths, so Y could be financially not sound and still make a deal mutually helping each other or Y could be the financially sound saviour

[@rishabhgupta6561]

at 33:00 sir, we dont know what kind of industry is that, so how can we conclude that it wil add pollution?

[@Syamlala12385]

seassions on gdpi please

[@maneshsharma8544]

sir in Q7 Statement 2 is not strong according to me, Reason- students can build their career in politics too

[@tarunsomsoley2469]

Sir it’s a request to make CR questions in line of actual 2 slots papers of 8th

[@dileepsinghrajpurohit3136]

Assertion and Reason krao na sir plz

[@REFLEXYTGOD]

Sir mjhe sidtm jana hai mere mock me 25 aare hai uske liye 35 chyi hoga please sir kya karu mai kuch bta dijiye

[@REFLEXYTGOD]

Sir reply please

[@nishant_sharma19]

Bhai mocks do

[@nishant_sharma19]

Sirf 35 hi target kr rahe ho toh LR aur quants pe accuracy rakho

[@sathvikkoride4487]

"The government is building two new stadiums in view of the international football games scheduled to be held here after two years." Assumptions: I. The existing infrastructure is not sufficient to conduct the games. II. The government has enough funds to invest in infrastructure. Only II is implicit Only I is implicit Both I and II are implicit Neither I nor II is implicit. Sir could you please help me with this question

[@yashshenoy6482]

I believe both are implicit as per the test of negation. If the existing infra is good enough than why would they build new stadiums If govt doesn’t have funds why would it even plan to build new stadiums

[@sathvikkoride4487]

​@@yashshenoy6482 I too thought the same. But the answer given was only 1 is implicit. Reason : Government having funds is not an assumption but a fact. I don't agree with this answer. So that's the reason I wanted to ask sir.

[@yashshenoy6482]

@@sathvikkoride4487 May i know where was this explanation given? Unlike maths there is no specific formula to solve the whole CR so i guess some subjectivity might flow into this

[@sathvikkoride4487]

@@yashshenoy6482 it was from my mock test of TIME and I'm not sure if that's the correct explanation and correct answer

[@pratiksharma2838]

in q 5 aisa bhi ho sakta hai dono company are in financial crisis and if hey merge or take help of each other's expertise then they can come out of financial crisis

[@pratiksharma2838]

in q4, we cant cant say english is prerequisite for being a model, lets say this ad was in a english speaking country like uk , but this prerequisite dosent hold for being a model in japan or china.

[@pratiksharma2838]

first question ki language galat hai, they must get good education and they must be getting good education mai zameen asman ka fark hai , aur sir aap question padh k acknowledge kar diya karo ki language is wrong yaha students confuse ho jate hai, aur aap just to cover up kuch bolte hi nahi ulta alag hi meaning nikal k bata rahe ho question ka

[@acecatbyicon]

@@pratiksharma2838 Appreciate your comment but in solving this question, it hardly matters whether it's must get or must be getting. The answer won't change. And everyone is free to interpret in his way and share his opinion.

[@itsMANAS28]

Sir do u teach offline for cat and snap 2025

[@itsMANAS28]

Directions: Read the given statement and the following assumptions and choose the correct option. Statement: "Reducing the speed limit on highways will decrease the number of fatal accidents." a High speeds are a major cause of fatal accidents b Drivers will not adhere to the reduced speed limit. C Reduced speed limits will not significantly impact travel times. d Decreasing speed limits is a feasible and enforceable measure.

[@nivanpandya6763]

A and D ?

[@itsMANAS28]

Sir solution of this question is only A . But i think A and D both are assumptions according to test of negation . Can u please help me

[@ayushsinghchauhan9558]

@@itsMANAS28 yeah both A and D are correct, it doesn't have to be feasible but if it's not enforceable why would we even suggest it? no logically sane person would suggest something which is not enforceable