So you receive a subpoena...

[@coudgeb]

Thats the most lawyerest thing ever said "I'm not going to tell you not to go 😉" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@infotechsailor]

Joe Schmo!

[@coudgeb]

​@@infotechsailor😂😂😂

[@verager2493]

The actual message: call an in state lawyer and ask. If they slaver a bit, you might have to case

[@MenacingBanjo]

If you actually want to force someone to show up to court, you need a dompoena.

[@jelioooo]

haha

[@istoleyourfridgecall911]

You are clever

[@literalantifaterrorist4673]

oh my goddd

[@jessesandburg]

Underrated comment

[@noblelies]

You mean a domgina, you pig!

[@joeschmoe0216]

Why is the bailiff calling me? I didn't get no subpoena, ya liar 😅

[@nicolemelo8994]

You're a legend

[@slymen2119]

Oooooh you going to jail. Should've been at court

[@hyunxzseu]

Joe Schmo No Show

[@gringa978]

He didn’t say not to go but he didn’t say you had to go 😂😂😂

[@MenacingBanjo]

It was probably for JoeSchmoe0215

[@damunzy]

We did subpoenas when we sued the school district in the special education courts. Nobody showed up but it made our case look stronger as we had checked off all these boxes on what we tried to do. We actually did have some people show up on the subpoenas. The judge originally thought that they were there because the school district had them show up but no it was us. The judge was very surprised and with the other information told the district to go out and settle with us because it wasn't going to go well for them. And that's how we sued and forced two school districts to settle with us over the educational needs of our children.

[@kylervoie]

Good shit

[@coffeefrog4224]

Damn now do that on the price of chips and we have a good system

[@Kumquat57]

​@@coffeefrog4224 acting like they just have infinite chips and their charging thousands for something that costs them nothing

[@natenate4525]

Not reading that

[@SirTorcharite]

​@@natenate4525 Huh, and you look old enough that you should actually have an attention span. Poor girl, it makes me feel bad how far the education system has fallen. I mean for me, someone who graduated only a decade ago, I can easily read whole books without struggle. But here you are unable to even get through a few simple paragraphs! Scary! _Idiocracy_ really was a documentary on the future!

[@bowlerkid]

Today I learned, courts have limited subpoena power!

[@TheSleepSteward]

“I’m not going to tell you; you don’t have to go…” 🤣

[@givrally]

Reminds me of that California court that subpoena'd the Signal messaging app asking for full names, addresses, message transcripts... associated with a phone number, and the only information they sent were account creation timestamps.

[@rowanxxd3366]

That’s because signal straight up just didn’t possess that information at all

[@averagegeek3957]

The fact that they gave a Unix timestamp that most people won't understand instead of a human readable date was the cherry on top.

[@ZeldagigafanMatthew]

​@@averagegeek3957 love that kind of malicious compliance

[@givrally]

@@rowanxxd3366 Yeah, and what's funnier is that they got like two or three more subpoenas after that, from different courts.

[@PrograError]

​@@givrallythey just had to try right?

[@noblelies]

We generally ignore out-of-state subpoenas. Unless it's from a federal court, it's pretty much just a kindly worded "love letter".

[@davidphetteplace4769]

I used to work in an ER. We would get subpoenas for patients that police brought in for blood work because they were arrested for drunk driving. The subpoenas would just be posted on a board. None of us ever checked the board because we didn’t want to go to court when we were normally sleeping.

[@borgranta61103]

Someone in the hospital would probably not be required to show up in court.

[@Kathdath]

I'm in Australia, the best your going to get from ANY court that issues a subpeona is for you to give testimony via video link because travelling in person to that particular court is overly burdensome.

[@dweep9546]

Some judges dont like approving requests to appear by video link. Have had that happen a few times

[@fermitupoupon1754]

It depends over here, if you're the defendant and you get subpoenaed, you have to show up or at least send a lawyer so you don't lose the case exparte. However, if a court closer to you is available then the people suing you will have to accommodate you and travel to that court. As a witness, it's entirely up to you whether you show up or not. There are a few exceptions where they can force you to show up, but in that case the police will come and pick you up. I've inconvenienced the lawyer of a municipality some 200km from here by requesting the hearing to take place in my home town. Sadly for said lawyer the court scheduled the hearing for 9 o'clock so he had to drive for 3+ hours through morning rush hour. The municipality lost the case, and appealed. Which I again had moved to the closest court near me. Which was about an hour drive north for me. The poor lawyer had to be there at 9 in the morning again and spent almost 3.5 hours in traffic just to get there. In the end I won the appeal on the same grounds that I won the initial trial. It being that the enforcement officer who had ticketed me, technically didn't have a mandate because the way they had set that up was unconstitutional. The appeals court then took it a step further and required the municipality to retroactively reimburse all parking tickets issued since they had changed the way mandate was given. It cost them hundreds of thousands of euros.

[@jenniferstorm4037]

It is hard to enforce subpoenas locally, too. Generally, if I am trying a case, I am not going to have the bandwidth and manpower for an entertaining side quest to enforce a subpoena through contempt proceedings and few clients want to pay for such a side quest.

[@CubeInspector]

And just because you enforce it doesn't mean I'm likely to be cooperative.

[@lightyagami3492]

​@@CubeInspectorExactly. I can just sit there and plead the fifth the whole time that way the subpoena was worthless.

[@Taolan8472]

When i worked security, my boss told me that I singlehandedly acceued more subpoenas in a year than the entire rest of the company in the last five years put together. Twenty-plus trespassing, eight vehicular colisions, five B&E, two assaults, and one DUI. I was prepared to go to court for every single one of them, only actually went to court for a handful of them. That DUI case was annoying though. The defense filed six continuances. I was paid for my time by my company, but still annoying AF.

[@Stolpskott100]

This is the kind of information that really should be explained in school. In fact, it used to be explained in (US) schools up until the 1950's or 1960's, in the courses on civics and government., where children were taught what government does, how it works, what the government does for you the people, and what you the people are expected to do in return (jury duty, answering subpoenas, etc.). Those courses also helped people practice their discussion and debating technique, learn critical thinking skills, and learn how to function as a member of a diverse community. Sounds like we could do with re-introducing those courses.

[@lindabrown2703]

The main problem here is that our government DOES NOT want us to understand how things work. They want to use our ignorance to their advantage and instill fear into us instead so that we will blindly follow whatever they say.

[@luckyowl314]

Who would you want teaching those courses though? What agenda would they have

[@knatsimpson6781]

I'm glad to see a Georgia lawyer!

[@vanringo]

I was a witness to a very bad car wreck with multiple severe injuries and I ended up working it as a volunteer fire fighter. I was also immediately behind the vehicle at fault for the wreck. I gave a verbal and written description to the deputy that was in charge of the investigation. This was in Colorado a couple months after 9/11. I moved to Arizona a couple months later because of the economy. About 6 months after that, I get a call from an attorney that represented the plaintiff (not at fault driver). They recorded my statement over the phone which pretty much matched the written statement I had given on the day of the accident. The attorney offered to fly me up and get a rental for me to drive the 5 hours from Denver. I opted to drive up since I was only a 9 hour drive. By the time I flew from Phoenix and drove down to Pagosa Springs, I could drive it. So my wife and I drove up. It was September and beautiful. I only wish I had time to do some archery hunting at the time. Anyway I testified and got to spend a long weekend with my mom and her long time partner. I also was able to get my dog that I had left behind when I first moved to Arizona. I even was able to get fresh roasted hatch chilies. I was so glad I drove up instead of flew.

[@REAL-UNKNOWN-SHINOBI]

The only lawyer that actually tells the truth

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

I think like any industry, the overwhelming majority of people are good and honest and truthful.

[@drl5002]

I would think that being outside the area of where the court is located would not even be an issue in this age of video conferencing. The witness could go to their local courthouse where there'd be a room setup to video conference live with the court that is having the hearing/trial.

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

You would think

[@RabbiKrieg]

Man this is a great idea! Genuinely it is, until you find out certain courts use Microsoft teams, other courts use zoom, others Google duo etc...., well for the state/local courts it would probably be like that. you might be able to get the federal courts to agree to one standard. But I would be in favor of anything that makes it easier for witnesses to testify, give depositions etc..

[@notreallydavid]

-Have you got a court subpoena? -No, it's just the way I walk. (UK, old)

[@DavidManouchehri]

Digging the watch collection!

[@deborahi910]

Not in my country, no matter where you are once a subpoena is served on you, you have to show up. But of course discussions must have gone ahead between the party being subpoenaed and the party asking the court to issue said subpoena. The court doesn't issue subpoenas suo moto! I believe its cause we have an adjudicatory system and not an inquisitorial system. The court would be seen as descending into the arena if it issues a subpoena suo moto.

[@whitestripe484]

This is the case in most countries, however US is a federal republic, where all non-federal cases are judged by local state courts, which technically have no power outside their jurisdiction. There are still federal laws and agreements between states, that bridge the gap between states (by requiring you to pay a fine you got in a state you no longer in, for example), but on the base level some court from California can’t command what a New York resident should do.

[@deborahi910]

@@whitestripe484 oh I see. My country is a federal republic as well. However, the court is seen as one across all states. The hierarchy of the court is also the same across all states. So, if subject to the rules of court, you file a suit outside the jurisdiction of the Defendant(s) or even just one of the Defendants, the Defendant(s) has no choice than to make an appearance if not judgement would be entered against him on the evidence of only the Claimant/Plaintiff. Likewise, if a subpoena is served on you, even though you are outside the jurisdiction of the court and so far there is proof that you received said subpoena, if you fail to attend court on the date slated for hearing, contempt proceedings may be brought against you. However, as I pointed out earlier, the party praying the court to issue a subpoena against an individual must have first discussed with said person and made arrangements on how to get the person to court venue on the date slatted for hearing. It would be unwise to subpoen someone outside the court's jurisdiction because it would tell on the finances of the person calling said witness. Also, you wouldn't ask for a subpoena to be issued to call a witness whose evidence would be adverse to your case. I'm sure that goes without saying. I must say this though, I like the method of the US judicial system, because if it isn't convenient for me, then I don't want to or have to stress about it.

[@CubeInspector]

​@@deborahi910 each court here only has jurisdiction over a certain part of the country except the US Supreme Court. Each federal district Court has jurisdiction over certain states or certain parts of states. Then above them there are appeals courts that have jurisdiction over set districts. Then after them is the Supreme Court. Then our states have their own laws, which are again enforced under certain judicial districts and then appeals districts and a state Supreme Court. The US is a big country. Most countries in the world are only as big as one US state.

[@TebTengri]

I can't imagine being forced to show and then actually cooperating with whoever got the subpoena. "I don't remember." "I forgot." or "I'm not sure I recollect exactly but maybe X, Y, Z facts that hurt your case"

[@suzanneporter2936]

In Montana, we give the server a check made out to the witness to cover witness fee and mileage to and from location. If the witness asks for payment and server doesn't have it, the subpoena can lawfully be refused. If they don't ask, the server returns our check and we shred it.

[@FlickerWanderfoot-rm4em]

Unfortunately for me if I'm ever subpoenaed in my county, I have to go since I live 20 minutes walking distance from the county court house

[@WedgeKahr]

My grandpa got subpoenaed by the guy who bought his accounting firm. He responded with a bill for 8 hours of his time at $200/hr. I don't know if they dropped the request, but he didn't hear from him ever again

[@Lynwood_Jackson]

Several years ago, some law firm was trying to get me to fly from where I lived to another state a thousand miles away because I used to work for a company their client was suing and they wanted to depose me. I said no and told them to serve me if they had the authority. They told me that a letter from their law firm they had sent a month before was the subpoena.😂

[@ethangamet5066]

This guy's fricking awesome and tbh, makes me want to become a lawyer

[@MSlocum669]

I got a supena to go to court as a witness. I called the DA office and told them I gave a statement to a trooper and they could use that and there was nothing else I could add. They called me back and told me I did not have to show. Small town never hurts to ask.

[@francisphillipeck4272]

So here subpoenas are a suggestion because when you subpoena someone you want their info, if they dont show and you jail them they will be much much less likely to give you good info if any at all, its counter productive to punish them, therefore they are a suggestion at best and most people ignore them lol

[@johnq748]

Thanks again that is some good information!

[@TheTee5231976]

In Massachusetts, if it's a civil judgment, the sheriff can arrest them on a warrant for nonpayment if you pay them to. They can give an order to appear for say $40 but to arrest its $400. They must be in county of the warrant and you need to know when and where they will be at. At least this was my experience in both my divorce where my ex skipped state and never paid any of things set forth in my judgment and a ex friend who stole money and items from me that she owed me for according to my judgement. Sadly I couldn't press criminal charges on her because of a few reasons including no physical proof she took the money and items regardless of the fact she admitted it to others.

[@ingamelevi1929]

If I'm ever subpoenaed, I'm going to court. I can tell my boss I'm legally required to go, and depending on the case, if I'm only required to be there half an hour, my day including transit time could be less than 4 hours.

[@kid-p7i]

I hope everybody is ok.

[@ryobibattery]

Do you have a warrant? No? Get off my property trespassing

[@benbookworm]

I've received a subpoena. Both I and my boss didn't like it, because they kept rescheduling the trial. Eventually the defendant accepted a plea deal and I didn't have to show up after all.

[@ClearGalaxies]

It must be hard carrying around all those reels of tape

[@edbangor9163]

What legal authority does a state judge even have to compell a witness to show up from another state? If I live in Virginia, and a California state judge/lawyer says i have to be there, what is the enforcement mechanism? The whole concept feels broken as hell. By the same logic, a cop from another Virginia could arrest someone for lane splitting in California (where it's legal) when the cop and the person arrested were both in Florida. At that point, there is no truth to local government whatsoever. Not that judges line to be told there are limits on their power. Or that "your honor" is uncomfortably close to the kinds of titles that the Construction explicitly bans

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

Doesn’t.

[@jamesodell3064]

A friend received a subpoena that was meant for another man who lived in the same community with the same first, last name and middle initial.

[@SilasC]

I just realized I didn't knew how to pronounce subpoena 😅

[@nealrcn]

What's really funny is when the knock. You get this paper you have never seen and have know idea what to do and no instructions. Was I supposed to be born with this knowledge.

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

The subpoena is an instruction to do something though.

[@sbrianbull2031]

Writ of bodily attachment is what should be done when witness within subpoena power of court does not show up.

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

A person can be held in contempt, and a sheriff can go and arrest them. But that doesn’t help the moment you need that witness to take the witness stand.

[@BrendanScalesdaytrading]

Like this channel a lot

[@stevenpeaketrainsandstuff3682]

Judge can order their appearance for certain offences.

[@greg2spook]

I had subpoena for information ...since I had none ... ignored it...nothing

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

You should contact a lawyer.

[@ThePolecatProcess]

If I got subpoenaed by a federal military court, and the subpoena said a warrant would be issued for my arrest if I failed to appear, do I need to go?

[@NotMe-ej9yz]

oh.... buddy.... Do NOT fuck around with military court ESPECIALLY if you are/were in the military. It's basically a kangaroo court where you have no rights and everything you thought you knew about regular courts is completely different. I would contact a military lawyer immediately so he can help you figure out what you need to do cause that's gonna be fucked to figure out on your own. Either way 100% show up cause if they say they'll arrest you they aren't fuckin around. You do not want to fuck around with UCMJ bs

[@Hi_Im_Akward]

Not the same, but I got called to jury duty in a state I didn't live in anymore and hadn't lived there for several years. By the time i got the letter, the date was only a few days away. It didn't amount to anything, when I called they said the trial was no longer happening. So damn weird, and there was no reason for me to be on that list.

[@llywrch7116]

They probably were working off an old list, either a voter's list or automobile registrations.

[@elizabethbottroff1218]

I had a lawyer approach me to be a witness once. He was a bit shocked to realize how badly his client had lied to him. I was absolutely going to be a hostile witness if required to appear. I never heard from them again. 😁

[@mjribes]

In other jurisdictions (outside of the US), ignoring a subpoena may put you in contempt of court meaning possible jail time. So international people - take this advice with a pinch of salt.

[@Spectrum0122]

Okay, now what happens when they retaliate and try to jail you for not going

[@siddharthdash8946]

If you are a witness outside courts jurisdiction you have nothing to wary

[@Legal_Sweetie333]

people just ignore them hahah

[@beastshawnee]

As free human beings there’s very little people can force you to do. …

[@EhRandomGuy]

Green sub, nice

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

🐸

[@aaravAgarwal-p5s]

Anybody else notice the clip of Samantha Wheeler?

[@andrewruis9531]

Can they issues warrants for your arrest? Or no

[@andrewruis9531]

If you fail to comply to show up

[@eolsunder]

any state can issue an arrest warrant for you no matter where you live in the us, arrest warrants cover all of the US. BUT they won't issue a warrant for failure to show up to a out of area subpoena, because you are not required to show up to an out of area subpoena.

[@jeo1812]

So, my family had an interesting case. My mom and sister share first and last name, different middle name. One day, we get a letter at our door with a subpoena for one of them. Which one? We don't know, there's no middle name. We call the court, they were like, "Uh, we don't know, both of you come". At the end, none of them were called. What we were wondering, what would have happened if the wrong one went, becuase the letter didn't specify Senior or Junior? [We were in California]

[@sheaross3124]

Do it. tell us not to show up. come to the dark side, we have cookies. delicious melty cookies. THE KIND THAT MAKE YOU HAVE FLASHBACKS OF YOUR CHILDHOOD.😅

[@kat5164]

Why do this guy remind me a little bit of mike Ross from suits ? 🫢

[@chesswack]

Can you get a court which has jurisdiction over them to subpoena them to come to the court the trial is happening at?

[@joebarton4947]

A co-worker of mine got called to be a witness in some trail for a former sheriff whose accused of taking bribes (often forcefully) in Bartow County GA and he came in to work ranting about how he wasn't going to go cause the guy will re-elected anyway (rural northwest Georgia is super corrupt take it from someone who lives here) and he didn't want to get on the shit list of a corrupt sheriff. They never forced him to come but to be fair this guy would be the definition of a hostile witness.

[@chuffrey445]

Good to know

[@davidwelker102]

So what do you do when you show up to court at the day and time stated on the subpoena only to find out the trial was rescheduled for the next day and nobody told you? About 18 years ago I called the police to report an abandoned vehicle in the middle of the road at about 11pm. Smack in the middle of the road. It was a neighborhood road behind the apartment I was in. I didn't see anyone in or around this van. A couple of months later I received a subpoena from the defense lawyer. Guy was passed out drunk somewhere in the van and claimed his friends drove him there and ditched him. He had been charged with DUI. They basically wanted me to testify at trial that I didn't see him driving the van. So when the trial came, I took the day off work and went to the courthouse. I couldn't find the case on the docket for the day. I called the lawyer and he told me that the judge had to reschedule the trial for the following day, or maybe the next week. I don't remember. They never called me to let me know. I was pissed. Took another day off to show up to testify. The guy was acquitted, largely based on my testimony. But yeah, I showed up on the day and at the time stated on the subpoena, only to find out it had been rescheduled and the lawyer didn't have the courtesy to let me know ahead of time.

[@davidwelker102]

Getting the subpoena was quite the experience too. It was about 9:00 pm (well after dark) and I got a call from an unknown number. They guy asked me my name and I confirmed. He then asked if I was home and I hesitantly confirmed. I asked who he was and he only said he would be there in a minute. I didn't have a clue what was happening, but sure enough there was a knock on my door a minute or two later. I grabbed my Glock before opening the door. The guy again asked my name, handed me an envelope, and said, "You've been subpoenaed." He then turned and walked away without another word. There was of course a phone number on the paperwork for the lawyer so I could call him and ask questions.

[@Canniba11er]

What is a Hostile Witness? I hear that term a lot and still don’t fully understand it

[@robertkelleher1850]

It's simply a witness who is testifying against the party that called them. The difference is that you can ask them leading questions like you would under cross-examination. As far as I understand you need permission from the court to treat the witness as hostile. If they work for the opposing party, for example, it might be easy, otherwise you'd have to demonstrate through an initial set of questions that the witness is antagonistic to your side. IANAL

[@danielhawkins6425]

So if you're flying out to take a deposition, is that for discovery or testimony? How does opposing counsel get an opportunity to cross?

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

This is a preservation of evidence depo. They are there to ask questions too.

[@OGimouse1]

Some of thise can be domesticated and extend the radius

[@Rainy_Day12234]

What if you sue someone from another state?

[@DrTHC]

So, I'm curious whether the travel expenses would be covered if they did agree to travel for their deposition or to appear at trial?

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

Well these people work for the defendant who is a large company, so that’s who would pay.

[@kurtmitterling5930]

Didn't the Supreme Court of New Jersey rule that there is no more video recorded witness statements because it's a violation of the defendant's Fifth Amendment right to face and question their Accuser?

[@duffy7993]

I paid on a 10 year old debt from 2013 in 22 and went back for the same thing in September of 23 for damages they weren't my fault. On a lease I had no income on. Do I have a case?

[@LordBloodraven]

I got a subpoena to provide all of my company's information related to a client we'd been doing business with since the 1950s. That's a lot of emails, receipts, letters and memos. Our lawyers told us to provide everything that was requested in boxes but make no effort to organize them. After tallying all the boxes, we rented two U-Haul trucks to drive 200 boxes of memos, letters and receipts to the lawyers who had subpoenaed this stuff. We even added files that weren't directly related, but had been filed under the same monthly folder. It was the perfect opportunity to bury a lawyer behind a nuisance suit with a truckload of papers while also clearing out our own records department.

[@SandbagsYoutube]

Sooooo... hypothetically if someone got a ticket for driving without insurance in another state and then never goes back to that state what typically happens? Can they go back years later or will they still have a warrant?

[@joeshmoe5160]

Sorry, wrong date

[@kpepperl319]

It depends if you are a politician or regular citizen... Ask jim Jordan

[@pandamode1129]

Is that a scene from Suits?

[@trmullins2]

Poor people don’t talk to the police cause if the do that’s an unpaid day off of work

[@aztheking6280]

He said pina

[@cajunguy6502]

What if I work for a security company and the subpoena for me is in the state the company HQ is, which is a long way from me. Am I covered by the radius, or is that just private citizens?

[@wthao]

can i cite the "jim jordan" precedent? lol

[@alexg37]

So what you're saying is, if I get a subpoena to call a lawyer?

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

That sounds like a good plan.

[@eatingelizabethsfrizbee]

Being honest isn't going to get you far in practicing law 😮

[@levayv]

Spoken like true lawyer: "I am not gonna tell You ... Edit: Longer You watch funnier it gets 😂

[@hyunxzseu]

Joe Schmo No Show

[@Normal1855]

If they want me to show up, they better supply transportation, lodging, food, and all expenses. And no run down motel. It will be a 5 star hotel.

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

Literally, that is not allowed.

[@Shteven]

You'd have to be providing significantly valuable information to justify the costs, and it wouldn't be the court footing the bill. They aren't going to pay all that for a testimony in a case worth 10 grand, or even 100. And they're going to explore every single alternative avenue before even considering paying such a thing.

[@BigRalphSmith]

However, you CAN subpoena a witness to a local courthouse and have them testify remotely. If the courthouse is local, yes, they have to go.

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

No, at least not under the federal rules you can’t. Otherwise, I would not be going to Detroit - I would just have the witnesses appear via zoom, but I can’t do that.

[@BigRalphSmith]

@@MikeRafiLawyer It appears that they simply haven't caught up yet with technology so that's likely to change. Especially considering that video taped testimony _is_ allowed under fed rules.

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

Been allowed since the 1990s. The idea of the federal rules being quick to change … unlikely. But I appreciate your optimism.

[@BigRalphSmith]

@@MikeRafiLawyer Never said it would be "quick", just likely.

[@HariSeldon913]

He's flying to Detroit. That's a very brave act.

[@toriless]

What if it is not your name??

[@arewahaircaretv8718]

As a lawyer I would advise you to go if you have been subpoenaed bcoz the court will proceed with or without you and it might not be in your favor just saying 😂😂

[@crappieking5592]

Crazy the cops can arrest you for not wanting to help them lol

[@MikeRafiLawyer]

What’s this have to do with cops?

[@eolsunder]

i think he's talking about the judicial system, not actual cops. but we get the idea.

[@catgoat6471]

#notlegaladvice

[@KyuKel]

With AI videos on the rise, I can see the video testament not being valid much longer

[@yo_boi_john4471]

Hello

[@justyouraveragezoomer]

*Cops knocking at my door: “Come on out we have a warrant” Me holding a glock with a shiny switch ive been wanting to test *

[@krusader9508]

Digital footprint is not your friend 😭

[@elijahjarman2837]

This-this doesn't good on paper

[@ohiasdxfcghbljokasdjhnfvaw4ehr]

cringe

[@Heymrk]

Ahh, the Trump defense.

[@SriyansQuandaliusJefferyson]

Could you rate the show suits?