SOLVING QUADRATIC EQUATION USING CASIO FX-82MS

[@fatmahuseynli2424]

Thanks. Now I can calculate my psycho teacher's exam problems with insane numbers

[@alperkucukhayrat]

You saved my life.

[@hopeless9434]

Thank's a lot . You saved my life ❤

[@chaitanya9893]

Thank you so much Brother. I thought I bought wrong calculator

[@sakhaaimterah9585]

Thank you so much this is so helpful

[@silanyenigun5448]

Thank you so much . I found the video I was looking for.😊🙏

[@Ekemobong]

I am grateful you found the video useful. I hope you have subscribe? You are really encouraging me to to more.

[@silanyenigun5448]

@@Ekemobong I subscribed, I wish you continued success.☺️

[@DicksonMulamata]

It's nice thanks

[@rawanraaz3470]

Thankyou sir 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@hellscythe_5565]

Thank You very much but why not use x instead just asking out of curiosity

[@Ekemobong]

You can use any letter...it doesn't change anything.

[@_sanjana-]

Is this good for engineering can we solve Matrix

[@Ekemobong]

It is good if you are a student and you are not allowed to use a higher version of calculator. But if you are allowed to use any calculator, you can go for a higher version like 991 and above. This calculator can not solve matrix directly.

[@happyfrezar2813]

Thank you so much

[@Ekemobong]

You are welcome. Please help me by subscribing to my channel. That is the only way I can be rewarded for the effort I have put in. Thank you.

[@kks9502]

How to calculate cubic equation bro on the same calculator?

[@Ekemobong]

No, it can not be solved with the same calculator. But if you need to know how to solve cubic polynomial using fx-991ES PLUS, I can make a video of that for you.

[@kks9502]

@@Ekemobong Thank you! But I don't have that calculator.

[@SelmaTullyAbiatar]

😢😮😊

[@ramajorajor8659]

Thank you🙏

[@AmarMurmu-xs8jx]

Please tell me, the difference between Casio fx 82 ms and Casio fx 100 ms scientific calculator...🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@Ekemobong]

I am sorry, I have not used FX-100ms before, so I dont know exactly the main difference apart from the fact that FX-100 is higher in memory capacity and operation.

[@AmarMurmu-xs8jx]

@@Ekemobong oh! it's okay. thanks.🙏🙏

[@howtodoit8185]

The 100 fx is like a little higher model than the fx82 ms . The 100 ms has more scientific commands .

[@7alken]

well, its crazy(?) ... now tell us how you got there ))

[@silanyenigun5448]

I guess we can't do this for complex numbers.

[@matiyavijay812]

Thank you

[@boogie89man]

🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿

[@fatimazafar24]

i m unable to understand anything. how do we calculate this: ax^2 + bx + c. 3n^2 - 14n - 5 A= 3 B = -14 C = -5. Final answer should be n = 5 , n = -1/3

[@Ekemobong]

@fatimazafar24 Take your time and be sure you are using the same calculation. You will get the answer.

[@Harshavardhini.KHarsha]

Why are you giving value of n =4

[@Ekemobong]

I did not give the value = 4, I only press the M+ button 4 times, to add the value to memory on the 4th screen display.

[@Harshavardhini.KHarsha]

Okay i can understand that . But why did you press 4 times . Any specific reason. Instead you can press 3??? Please help me I have xam tomorrow

[@Ekemobong]

When you press Shift and 2, you will see the first option [x dx sx], second option [y dy sy], third option [A B C] and fourth option [x1 x2 y]. So, since we are concerned with the fourth option, that is why you have to press 4 times. The first and second option are for mean, standard deviation.etc, while the fourth one are for values of x. If you are still confused, I can make a video to explain for you if you don't mind.

[@Harshavardhini.KHarsha]

Thanks bro. Now i understood .🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻(saviour )

[@Ekemobong]

Please, could you subscribe to my channel? Please?

[@raistarop6247]

Thanks you Nehal ma'am

[@TechMobileReal]

What is the default mode of the calculator?

[@Ekemobong]

I am not sure I understand your question. But, in case you need to work on the normal calculation mode, just press mode button and then 1

[@belle4464]

That made no sense.

[@howtodoit8185]

Its prob cuz u got no brains 😊

[@7alken]

FYI: .... hello boy, or hell boy, I dont know .... just for curiosity, I tried to do this on canon f-715sg which ALSO has regression(!) mode for quadratic equations ... so, I managed to enter the formula and found DATA button instead of M+ used for this on it, to enter statistical data, values, probably NOT symbolic equations ... so all 4 entered data was 0,0 (just checked now, when I understood (probably) whats happening here, AFTER SEVERAL HOURS !!!) ... but this is all after few hours, started by asking chatgpt4o how these two devices differ (and BTW, I dont ned it to anything, I was just curious about SIMILARITY of internals of these (probably chinese) chips inside, because nobody already makes new calculators, nobody serious in any part of world ...) ... but chatgpt4o spreads absolutely idiotic oppinions about these devices, instead of simply saying plain and simple "I DONT KNOW" (as any honest person anywhere in the world does), when (s)he in fact really does not know, or better, knows NOTHING about this ...(well, offered regular persian formula from 750 ad or so ... as you used ....) ... okay ... but that canon after finding the x in S-VAR results, after entering 4 0,0 into regressions stats data memory (yes, you entered 4 0.0 actually, or atleast I here on the canon ....) ...that this lovely canon (which is here btw ONLY for repurposing his case and keyboard for something completelly differnt and will die soon) got me result SYNTAX ERROR )) ... I can imagine you had some values in the C memory slot already, so that was what you entered into the reg stats for quadratic equation, but I still doesnt understand prooperly what happened .... in case you did this all solely to catch some new subscribers, than I hope somebody nearby will slash your face in case this is SCAM )) bye

[@7alken]

well, okay ... apologies, its crazy(?), because at least on casio fx-82ms (2nd ed) it really works ... on canon f-715sg no; math error ... still don't know why ))

[@beatrizllanosramos8810]

🤔🤔.... es mas facil con papel y lápiz!...

[@Ekemobong]

Please, I don't understand