Sony 135mm F1.8 G Master: Definitive Review | 4K

[@bebigorl]

I've been watching for almost 2 years now and it's so pleasing to have seen your channel grow. Well deserved.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's great. Thank you!

[@kane01337]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Very nice - as great as the Sony is - the Zeiss highlight rolloff on the skintones seems more pleasing in the portrait comparison + also seems to dim the OOF Background area more - which appears to isolate the subject just that little bit more... would be interested in seeing any other comparison portraits with different backdrops + lighting! - Great stuff as always Dustin !

[@madrobotgames2677]

I owned and sold many Sony lenses. This is one lens I will never sell.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I can see why!

[@jlozano281]

Same here. I thought it was too expensive, however given the results, it is reasonably priced. My clients love the results.

[@GiNodrog]

Waiting for the delivery of mine , thanks for your comment.

[@panoskonomi2875]

@@jlozano281 hi there, 70-200 gm vs 135 gm on a7riv crop mode? Cheers 🍻

[@jlozano281]

@@panoskonomi2875 Depends on your needs. I prefer the 135 GM myself (even in crop mode), but if you need the versatility, you will need the 70-200. I would wait until the 70-200 GM Mark II comes out though. Not sure when that will happen though. I wish Sony made a lens like Canon's 200 f2. That lens is badass.

[@Ram.Saketh]

Thanks for the extremely informative review. Helped me make a decision on the purchase of this lens.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad it was helpful!

[@DjimmyTrovy]

The video and the pictures look so magical in a way. Both the Zeiss and the GM are indeed very special lenses.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's true.

[@JayPoe80]

Just found your reviews. Appreciate your compete, detailed take on this beautiful lens! It is the first and only lens I purchased when I bought my A7RIV. I am glad I started shooting Sony with this pairing. I get excited listing to other who appreciate this lens as much as I do.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's an amazing lens.

[@JayPoe80]

@@DustinAbbottTWI watched a few more of your reviews. Great job!! Looking at the 24mm GM next. I'd like to shoot some video. I know a 16-32 or 70-200 would be great lenses, more versatile and probably a better choice for someone with a budget for only a couple lenses but fast primes make me far more excited to shoot! If I were shooting real estate or weddings I'd buy those two zooms but I'm not so adding only special lenses to my currently small collection. Thanks again for great content! I don't miss all the tattoos, the bat cave or the huge fro!!! 🤣

[@ajalbetjr]

I'm in total agreement!! I've had the opportunity to rent and use both GM lenses (135/1.8 and 24/1.4) with the A7R IV; the lens is SO exceptional I've kept looking for excuses to use it...just amazing and mind-boggling sharp.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Very true

[@jurban3a]

Another great review! I was recently faced with a sale of $300 off list on this lens. I needed a quick review before I left for appointments and errands. There were only 4 of 49 left in stock, and I didn't want to miss out. Once Dustin said it was the best of 5 GMs he's tested, I bought it confidently at $1800 USD. With taxes, it was still under 2 grand. His reviews are always a factor in my decision-making on hardware since a spec sheet can only provide a limited amount of information. Cheers!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It’s an amazing lens; you will definitely enjoy it.

[@erg1450]

Dustin, been watching your channel for years now, you always nail them. I have this lens since it came out in the market and is an amazing one, however, I have to agree, the 135mm focal length is not that versatile and I don't use a much as I wish I could. Versatility king for me is my 35 GM .......I pair it with the 85 GM II and got covered most of what I need for events. One area where I found very useful the 135 is for sports where light is poor ...got some amazing pics from my kid's soccer games

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's a fair take all around.

[@artmaltman]

Beautifully composed shots in this video, can tell that you were very inspired. Many of these shots you should print and place on a wall in your home. Stunning rendering.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really does render amazingly. I love shooting with it.

[@panagiotistsiverdis]

What an amazing channel! Bravo mr. Abbott!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you.

[@Xetenor]

What an awesome review Dustin and wonderful pictures. Really was looking forward to see how much this lens would impress you and I am not surprised :) This lens is truly exception in so many ways, just wow. It's one of the lenses in my kit that always brings a smile when I look at the picture after. Hope you and your family is all well and safe!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is really special.

[@samtaylor4592]

Heard very very good comments about this lens. This video confirms it in great detail. Thanks Dustin

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is stunningly good.

[@sunilchitolie6771]

No way u just reviewed this! I just said I was thinking of getting this lens in ur other vid. Definitely watching this whole vid :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@markhenesy4990]

I own the 135 GM, astonishing are the pics that I get from this lens. DA does point out the difficulty of the lens, to get a full-body shot, the distance is far, 30 feet. But the image of that subject will be the best they will ever have. You will have to pay good money to get this kit,; I have never regretted paying it to get the images I achieve every time I use it.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's a good summation.

[@NickGranville]

Thanks Dustin. I plan to get this lens soon. I really like the 135mm focal range, it’s really useful - on both full frame and crop bodies. All the best

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is special.

[@jeremys7352]

I have the 24 and 135. Absolutely fantastic lenses. I'm really hoping the 85 gets upgraded into a V2, and there is finally a 50 GM. Those 4 would be my complete kit for a very long time.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You've got the best of the primes, then. And yes, both of those could use some further refinement, though I own the 50 Planar and think it is pretty brilliant.

[@mtpicasso1982]

I first found your channel, when you did the Zeiss Batis 135mm review. That lens is very very amazing. Am actually feeling very hyperbolic about it. Best lens that I’ve had. It’s a shame it never got more appreciated. I’ve now sold all my Batis lenses. And got some practical zoom lenses. But there are two primes I had to get. I bought the 50mm Sony Zeiss F 1,4 that lens is already become my new favorite. I can live with the AF. It’s fair on the A7RIV... Now the 135mm Sony F1,8 is bought, just waiting for the mailman... Am really looking forward for this one ☝🏼 Thank you Dustin, you are the only one on KZbin, that I really appreciate for lens reviews. Yours are the best

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The 135 GM will blow your mind.

[@RaphaelBellizziFilms]

I bought it as an investment few weeks ago because the store sold it brand new for 50%. I was planning to sell it or trade for another kind of lens but with only a couple of shots and watching your review I realized that I’ll never gonna sell it! Thanks for the great review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Wow - that's an amazing price!

[@buddyWalrus]

Don't even use Sony but this was an excellent review. Thank you. I like your jacket too.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Well thank you on both counts :)

[@williaminbody205]

Your reviews are very through and informative. Clearly at the top of reviewers.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you very much!

[@stefantotev]

I was a bit ‘worried’ after watching your 135 Milvus review. I was wondering whether you have tried the GM. Now I watched this review and completely agree with everything said. It sure finds a place in my personal ‘holy trinity’ of best Sony lenses - 24GM, Zeiss 55 1.8, 135GM.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Stefan, I'm with you on everything but the 55mm F1.8, which I personally find only average. After my direct comparison series, I purchased the Planar 50mm F1.4, which I think is more like the GM series.

[@stefantotev]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I hadn't watched your reviews of the 50s, so I went ahead and did :) Let's agree to disagree. I don't really think you say anything that bad about the 55 apart from some chromatic aberrations and worse bokeh (which is totally subjective). My opinion is that the 55 is the best overall lens for the entire system considering image quality, autofocus, size, build and price. I bought mine 4 years ago for 680$. The AF is super fast and silent, sharpness is one of the best in the system, colours and bokeh for me personally are totally fine (I always do some colour correction either way). Considering everything mentioned so far, the size of the lens make me adore it even more and probably this is the only lens I will never sell as long as I shoot Sony. Funny thing is that when I take photos with it and look at the back of the display, photos look so-so. When I import them and see them on the big 27" retina screen every single time I am amazed by the photos this little lens produces. The only thing I miss in it is an AF/MF switch. But for this thing only I will never get a much larger, heavier and more expensive lens (such as the Planar 50 1.4). I used to have the Sigma 50 1.4 Art and used it adapted for awhile on my a7r II, but then decided to switch it with the 55 Zeiss. What I'm looking forward, however, is a 50mm GM f1.2. If Sony are able to make it compact and not so heavy (similar to the way they've built the 24GM), it will be a very interesting lens.

[@fjmroque]

I have almost the same set: 135gm + a7r4, and 24gm + a6600. For the “in-between” I’ve gone from the 55z to an 85 Batis which I’ve also sold. Now trying to decide which one of the two I’m gonna buy again (love the Batis rendering but 55z makes a little bit more sense).

[@darrellbissing]

As usual, another fine production. Thank you.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you very much.

[@dans.8198]

At 21:08, the comparison with the Sonnar seems to show much better color rendition for the Zeiss lens. Skin colors are too orange-ish on the Sony shot (21:20). Did you use the exact same white balance in the comparison ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Using the exact same white balance would be a mistake, as the glass is different. Using the same metering with white priority (which I did) is the better way to handle it.

[@dans.8198]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Seems weird to me that modern glass could be imparting such strong orange color cast. If you correctly matched white in both shots, then I find the Sony lens very disappointing as far as color rendering is concerned.

[@alexhall9450]

Thanks Dustin. I picked up a second hand copy which was like new for a bargain price. Wow this lens is on a new level

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is. Amazingly good.

[@YasserSultan]

Thank you, Dustin! I've been waiting for this review for so long. Excellent review!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

You're welcome!

[@ErwanYTube]

Thanks Dustin - building my Sony lenses collection and I love watching your reviews. I was just considering the 135 GM and I saw your video. Sold! I really like my 85/1.8 but I think that one will bring new perspectives to portraits.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is special. You'll enjoy it.

[@jlozano281]

Your reviews are so thorough and informative. Thank you for taking the time to do these.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad it was helpful!

[@MrRandomatom]

I have to say, that is a very dashing ensemble you’re donning, sir! Great vid, as usual.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I get more positive comments on that coat than anything else I own.

[@matteomicozzi1661]

Thank you Dustin, i was waiting for your review of this lens for so long. I thought this lens was exceptional, now i'm sure of it. It will be in my arsenal very soon :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's well worth purchasing!

[@Phillyo118]

I've just bought this lens and now I'm very seriously considering selling my 70-200 2.8 GM as I just don't use it anymore! Such an amazing lens. Couldn't be happier with it.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is an amazing lens...a hard one for a 70-200 to compete with optically.

[@dusty_burkhalter]

Debating between these exact two lenses for sports photography. I shoot mostly video with my 24-105 but want a lens I can swap to during games to grab some good photos. I feel like this lens would pair up better with the A7C than would the 70-200 f2.8.

[@ladydsi4051]

I have the 135mm and I love it! The bad thing about is I need to be super far away from my subject(s). This lens is so sharp that you can see every little pore on someone’s face!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's true - the focal length can be a little long to work with.

[@fredericcudeiro6614]

Very good review..as usual!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you very much.

[@YoureTerminatedFckr]

I'm sitting here watching your excellent reviews trying to decide whether or not I want the versatility of a 70-200 (or the Tamron 70-180) or if I want the stone cold performance of the 135mm. I've always preferred primes, but you make an excellent point regarding the wedding and being a little cramped with the 135mm. I currently own the A-Mount 135mm STF lens, and while I absolutely adore the images it can capture even as a relatively experienced manual focuser, I cant deny that I would love to "upgrade" to a AF lens. Ugh, decisions decisions.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's a tough call. The 135GM is so special optically, but you have to be realistic about when and how often you'll use it.

[@TheRogueElement]

I was pleased to see this posted when I have morning coffee in hand ☕😀

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Enjoy!

[@Anarki2U]

:) As allways I prefer the written review ;) I have had the Sony 135mm 1.8 GM for about one and a half year now, it is a brilliant lens, superp quality, I love it for landscape, close-up, portrait, arcitecture, street and allround photography, recently I used aa a close-up lens both at fullformat and in APSC mode on my Sony A7RIV, the pictures turned out very well, so it is good for nature close-up photography as well :) Happy New Year and gear ;) Before the Sony 135mm 1.8 GM, I had the Canon EF 135mm 2.0 L which is a very good lens, but the Sony are much better and that tells a lot ! The only thing I want are a 1.4X teleconverter for the Sony, I had a 1.4X for the Canon and I loved that combination, which I used many times. My kit of lenses are Sony 24mm 1.4 GM, Sony Zeiss Sonnar 55mm 1.8, Sony 135mm 1.8 GM, Sony 200-600mm 5.6-6.3 G and a lot of "classic" anaolog manually focusing lenses from Canon FDn, Leica R and Tamron.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The 135 GM is an amazing lens. My only regret is that I don't get to reach for it more often!

[@Anarki2U]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Well, do as I do, bring only one or two lenses at a time with you :)

[@wilhelmrosenthal1305]

Ok so this lens is impressive for sure and it does seem to have surpassed the Milvus/Sonnar 135 in terms of sharpness. But I have to say that my love for Zeiss Otus and Milvus lenses goes beyond the ability to resolve, to me what makes them special is their unique spatial rendering and making images pop to the point where they are almost absolutely “transparent” and make you feel as though you are inside the image with the subject. This is something I haven’t seen with even the best Sigma Art lenses. Until a lens can give that Zeiss 3D pop and amazing sharpness in one package I will stick with my Otus. Sure, I don’t have autofocus but with the Canon focus guide it’s a breeze to use, almost like driving a smooth manual transmission car. It just reintroduces the photographer’s input back into the equation. I watched a KZbin video from someone called Straight Out Of The Camera and he explained that the Zeiss 3D was not a result of high micro contrast but of their inherent lens design. As they say there is more to a lens than sharpness, maybe Zeiss sprinkles a bit of magic dust that we don’t know of...

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hard to argue with that. I too love Zeiss rendering.

[@simonc4764]

Some filmmakers call cine lens that gives spatial depths "air". I did a test with focus peaking and notice the peaking intensity on Zeiss lens appears more gradual while a typical Canon EF lens there is hardly any, so its very sharp in focus and then not so sharp off focus with little in between.

[@thomasgunn4146]

Another great review Dustin. Hope you and your family are staying safe. Best regards brother

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks, you too!

[@abtyne]

Excellent channel. Detailed and meticulous reviews.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Glad you like them!

[@mawavoy]

Thanks for the Zeiss comparison.

[@helencogan2187]

GREAT review..I have the Batis 85 1.8 & the Zeiss Sonnar 55 1.8..and I am very happy with them..really good lenses .. BUT I think I'll be saving for this 135Gm...Thank you again!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It is a seriously amazing lens.

[@sniperv]

I thumbs up as soon as I heard the epic music! I knew I was in for a great review!I've rented this lens and it's phenomenal! Incredibly sharp and love the size and weight. I agree with the 135mm is constricting and can be hard to use if you don't have the room especially at the price, which is a reason I don't currently own it.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm glad you enjoy the review.

[@attila.daniel]

Thank your for the great review! I was waiting for it for a long time, but it came as you promised. 👍🏻

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure!

[@havoc23]

Thanks Dustin, your reviews are always very appreciated! My motivation curve was as folllows: 0:00-25:30 Constant building up of urge to buy it, 25:30 ff.: realization that I don't need it, I need an 85mm :D

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's the reason why I included that commentary. It's only fair to those not experienced with shooting with the 135mm focal length.

[@havoc23]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Yeah, the family father chasing their elementary-school-aged kids during playtime in the garden will probably enjoy this lens less. Anyway, from an aesthetic point of view, this is a purely beautiful lens. Keep up the good work!

[@jonspoard8416]

Thanks Dustin. I think you've made up my mind for me to get this lens

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm about to buy one myself.

[@malsvp]

Congratulations for the revue, can we expect a review of the new 135 mm from samyang? or a comparation review between las 135 mm del mercado para Sony

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Samyang tells me that I should receive the 135 mm somewhere around the middle of the month

[@troyphillips1077]

WOW ! I’ve seen where many Sony users have been ooooing and awwwwing over this lens and the 24mm . I now see why . Love your lens reviews this is why I watched this . I shoot Nikon DSLRs and will most likely transition to the Z system but if I went to Sony this is the lens I’d get for sure . I like the 135mm focal length. So useful for what I shoot . Thanks again

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Yes, if you enjoy the 135mm focal length, this is a KILLER lens.

[@michaelweichhardt]

Hello Dustin! If you only had 2 lenses for travel which one would you pick to complement the 135mm? For me, I guess it would be the 20mm F1.8 - but I am not too sure, these two lenses are very specific.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Something like the 24-70 or 28-75mm from Tamron if you want a faster zoom. The best travel lens on Sony right now is the Tamron 28-200mm. It's pretty good at most everything.

[@michaelweichhardt]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thank you!

[@MORTRAX]

since i got this lens i barely touched my 85gm, but the 85gm renders very nice and soft. i like both, different beasts..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's true, though in terms of pure performance, the 135 is definitely more exceptional lens.

[@nogerboher5266]

I do fashion and beauty and I shoot only with 24, 55 and 135 and I just recently switched to Sony from Nikon (Nikon D810!) I bought the 24mm GM, I kept the 55mm Otus and now I'm looking for a 135mm! I'm jumping between the 135mm Batis APO and the 135mm GM... After watching this video I'm leaning more towards the GM... Hmmm, going to be a tough choice!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'd personally go GM (I did), but your mileage may vary

[@idontwantacallsign]

Thank you for a great review 👌👌. You are simply nthe best camera reviewer out there. Very through and detailed👌👌

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

My pleasure!

[@孫振新]

Came back to look at this review again to compare with the 50mm GM. How would you compare the optical performance between the 135mm and 50mm GM? In particular I am interested in the issue of longitudinal chromatic aberration, you did a comparison against Milvus 135mm here but you didn't show it for your 50mm GM review. Thanks!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hmmm, these are very different focal lengths. I'm not sure there is any overlap.

[@stefan_becker]

Thank you very much for your always amazing reviews! I own the 135mm GM and agree that 135mm is a little bit too long. I would have prefered a 105mm 1.4 in that form factor. Unfortunately the otherwize amazing Sigma 105mm 1.4 is extremely large and heavy. So it seems we've got the choice between too heavy and too long.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Agreed. I would love a 105mm F1.4 GM that performs similarly.

[@simonc4764]

The thing Zeiss Milvus 135mm f2 has is the "pop", colour and flare control. How does this Sony 135mm compare?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Simon, I did try to address that here. I don't think that the Sony is quite as special in terms of rendering, but it delivers more consistent results due to having that amazing AF.

[@mikegiacobbe7758]

Thanks for the review. Saving up

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Me too.

[@lenhister]

Hi Dustin, late to the party, and just picked up this lens. Do you notice any noise when focusing at higher apertures for photography? Mine is silent at f1.8 but stopping down to f2.8 and there's noticeable noise when autofocusing. Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

What you may be hearing is actually the sound of the aperture opening and closing. The lens focuses at F1.8 always, so you get some sound at F2.8 that you don't hear at F1.8. Pretty typical

[@lenhister]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Hi Dustin, very grateful for your reply and knowledge. You're right, when I look through the lens, I see the aperture opening and closing when attempting to focus at larger apertures. Thank you for all that you do.

[@charliewright7274]

Dustin out here in the woods looking fly as hell lol.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

LOL. Thanks. I was actually freezing during this review.

[@PointShiftDrive]

Dustin, I am really struggling. I currently use Sony 16-35mm gm lens for most of my work. But I’d like to have something for portraits and video at least 50mm. That way I can expand on my reach. But I have found it incredibly difficult to find no brainer lens for Sony. I came from canon and now using A7siii. Is the 135mm the one? I was worried about the only drawback you mentioned as well. 85mm would be fine but I dont think that lens is that special. And i would hate wasting $. Thoughts!?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If you go 85mm, check out my video of the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN. It's what I chose and purchased at 85mm.

[@kane01337]

21:42 - while the GM 135 is sharper and a fantastic lens - it seems to lack the highlight & colour control the Zeiss has which you can see in the skintones / highlights, combined with slightly smoother bokeh & a touch better CA performance - it seems the 135 APO Milvus still has a place for particular shoots + certain users that don't demand AF & value high quality rendering. "My only real argument for the Milvus over the 135GM is that I think that when viewed globally the Zeiss color is a little bit richer and the defocused region is arguably a little more pleasing." ^^ from Dustin's full review - Well said Dustin - both fantastic lenses & nice to have choices :) ps what EF-E adaptor where you using? sometimes the rear element planarity with sensor can be off by sub mm's that affect corner performance.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks for the good feedback, and I use the Sigma MC-11 adapter, which I've tested thoroughly and doesn't seem to impact corners in any meaningful way.

[@kane01337]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Might be worth comparing to the EF Metabones , I have found the Sigma rear element tolerances can be off on heavier lenses (over 1kg) - just in case! love your work Dustin! cheers :)

[@tbreit]

Dustin, I think the Sony GM 135 & 24 have set the mark for pro-grade Sony FE lenses. Could I suggest you do a "lookback" summary review of them and list the areas that need fixed for a 'Gen2'? Lookback/upgrade reviews are often done in cars, firearms and TV's when products meet logical/generational updates and would be really fitting with so many Sony models finally released, especially for those out for 3-4 years.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Thomas, that seems a little redundant at the moment, since I just reviewed them both in the past month and a half and already highlighted areas of weakness.

[@tbreit]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Hi Dustin, sorry....I meant older lenses that should be moving into Gen2, not recent stuff. For example, GM 16-35, 24-70, 70-200, 85, and maybe some older G-series units. Expectations should be adjusted upwards on Gen2 units considering pressure from Sigma and Tamron. My thought is a summary of major/minor improvements for these units would be informative from a person like you.

[@saudi4us]

The other video (standard Sony 135mm review) is unlisted ... I only can reach it through the link in this video ... you should open the video for everyone

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It isn't supposed to be public until Friday. That's the way I do it.

[@IanWilkinson]

Couldn't agree more with your findings, it's a truly exceptional lens, and your example photos really do it justice. On a general point I was wondering whether or not you shoot in compressed or uncompressed raw with the A7R III - I find that the uncompressed file sizes (at about 82 Mb) are just too large for me and I don't see a huge difference in quality.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Ian, I shoot almost exclusively compressed on my RIII but shoot uncompressed on the a9.

[@andgainingspeed]

Very much enjoyed the definitive review of the 135mm GM. I "settled" on a Batis 135mm because of weight for my travel kit and I'm very happy with how it renders and a bit surprised with how much I like the focal length. Looking forward to the Tamron 70-180mm reviews. 👍

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Used correct, the 135mm focal length is incredibly special.

[@milosvolenec6514]

Thank you Dustin, great review. Is it possible to use an extender (1.4?) with this lens? Thanks.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Milos, I don't actually know the answer to that as I don't yet own a Sony 1.4x extender.

[@Anna-xf5sh]

Thank you for your fantastic yob. I have a question. Is it normal that when i swing the Lens up and down something inside shifts ?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

What you are probably hearing is a "floating element" that allows for better performance at close distances. People often get freaked out about lenses like this, as they fear that something is broken in their lens. I think your lens is fine, but should it get louder, then certainly have Sony check it out.

[@Anna-xf5sh]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Thank you for the fast reponse. After looking at your reviews, i bought this lens and the 24 F1.4 GM and A7R III. God bless you.

[@rolandrickphotography]

Hi Dusting, thanks for that review. I am new to the Sony world so your reviews are such a great help. Makes me thinking of getting this lens. The eye sharpness at 20:45, could you achieve that with AF-C or AF-S? I suspect AF-C, because on AF-S, the slightest move front/back of model or photographer and you’re out of focus at 1.8. Did you use the 7M3 or 7RM3 for that portrait?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I used R3 for the portrait, and I use AF-C in those situations as it will adjust for any subject movement.

[@davidburton2294]

I owned the Sigma 135mm 1.8 which was great but really heavy and slow focus. Had the Nikon 135mm f2 ais manual focus and f2 DC which were brilliant. Now i'm using my Sony A7R11 this might be the go!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's expensive, but it is a brilliant lens.

[@ryelc5218]

if you needed one lens to do portraits, could this be the one? I am a landscape shooter / animal shooter so I am very attracted to this as my first portrait lens.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It's the most amazing one on Sony, though 135mm is not as versatile a focal length as something in the 85mm range.

[@samhartwig4640]

Unbelievable lens. I like shooting it close up in my kids face. Focus is fast

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is unbelievably good.

[@gamingchannel-gh2wh]

I'm definitely Goin to get this lense. It look amazing in the beginning of your video, even tho youtube has compression..

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I'm expecting my own copy to arrive today. It's very expensive, but amazing.

[@sheldonang2193]

Hey Dustin, how would you rate the bokeh and image quality of 135 at F1.8...vs the 70-200 GM at 135mm and 2.8...is it noticeably different?

[@sheldonang2193]

Or the 70-180 tamron which I own

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The image sharpness of the 135 GM is pretty much unparalleled. I think the bokeh is fine, probably pretty similar to the Tamron on the longer end.

[@georgemurray752]

Another great review. Now, where did you get that great jacket!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks, George. The jacket is from here: www.banggood.com/custlink/vDmYIDnwdZ

[@obayedh]

Wonderful review as usual Dustin. Much thanks. Please take care and stay safe.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thanks, will do!

[@christianzayco4287]

Great review Dustin! Sold all my previous gear from Canon, Nikon and Olympus and built enough of a budget and now I’m trying to build my Sony setup. Theres 5 lenses I wanted to own namely the 24GM 85GM 135GM 90 2.8 macro and 50 1.4 Z. I Can’t afford all of them all at once. Out of these 5 lenses, which would be the first 3 I should get that offers good balance? Perhaps the 24GM 85GM 135GM? Or 24GM 90 2.8 macro 135GM? Or 24GM 50 1.4 Z 85GM? hard to pick. Please help me decide :) Thanks Dustin

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would say the 24mm, 90, and 135 gives you the most versatility. You get both macro and a nice short telephoto portrait lens in the 90.

[@RS-Amsterdam]

Did I miss the chromatic aberration test ? Those branches against the snowy BG would be ideal !

[@stefan_becker]

Chromatic aberration? Not with this lens! I have never seen any with my 135mm GM.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I did show a CA test in the review - I compared it to the Milvus.

[@RS-Amsterdam]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Yes I have seen it, that's also why I was wondering why he didn't pay any attention to it.

[@wolper2155]

Hallo Dustin. Great Video. Greetings from Germany.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!

[@megaapfel]

I wish Sony had an 85mm lens which is that good. I got to test the Sony 85mm F1.8 and the Samyang 85 F1.4 over the last couple of days and I can purchase them for the same price but I'm not really pleased with the AF performance of the Samyang, especially in videos and continuous eye-af, but I also can't really justify going with an 1.8 with more noise. On top of that I already got the Sony 70-200 f4 which I found to be extremely sharp, but I need something with a wider aperture for low light which I shoot in a lot. So the 135 F1.8 GM looks really tempting, but like you said it probably can't fully replace a 70-200 because there will be cases where it will be too close. I guess I should wait for an improved 85mm 1.4 GM.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Check out the new Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN for Sony; it's currently my 85mm of choice there.

[@town3]

Love the look of this video. very nice

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Thank you!! The 135GM certainly helps produce a beautiful video.

[@snotlobber]

Excellent review DA! How would you put this up against the Sigma 105 1.4/art? Sharpness and af response?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I haven’t seen anything that matches the Sony for sharpness. The AF is definitely stronger on the Sony, too

[@alexmartins4013]

24 GM ans 135GM are my favorites. But I have so much fun with the 200600G also :)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Agreed, those three are among my favorite Sony lenses.

[@alexmartins4013]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks for the reply Dustin. You provide most certainly the best reviews I have seen on KZbin. Great job and very detailed. You deserve way more followers for sure.

[@bogfinken]

I've tried so hard to convince myself I don't need to spend the money on this lens. This review didn't help me at all !!

[@alexmartins4013]

@@bogfinken you know you need it ;)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

LOL - I'm in the same boat

[@gjagun]

Hi nice vids... I just bought one today... just wondering if this lens has zoom function? Cheers

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It does not.

[@Lastman10101]

I have this lens, would you choose this over the 100 Otus :]

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

For practical purposes, yes. The Otus delivers unbelievably special images, though, and I love the flexibility of the 100mm focal length.

[@spicyyetumami]

Hey bro does Sony 20mm 1.8 focus breath and if it does when?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's asking me to go back a long way (dozens of reviews ago) and remember that one detail. I'm afraid I can't do that...and I don't own the lens to check.

[@acouragefann]

This lens is beautiful and uncompromising in its optical quality - but it really reminds me why I wish that Samyang had made an autofocus version of their 135mm f2. It's not as bright (and likely not quite as sharp), but I really loved the rendering of that lens while I owned it (and it remains a genuine bargain for what it delivers optically)

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I agree that the Samyang has very nice rendering. I'm still hoping that such a lens is coming. Even a compact 135mm F2.8 would be welcome.

[@anthonybohemier3882]

Always enjoy your reviews even though I shoot nikon. Plus it's nice seeing some places I recognize... curious where abouts this is though :) keep up the excellent work

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Right now its almost all in Eastern Ontario. I can't travel far right now due to isolation, though fortunately I do have some freedom to roam around the woods in my area.

[@samb4502]

@@DustinAbbottTWI pretty much the same here .. im in Pembroke and most of the time i wander the old rail lines searching for interesting things to shoot :)

[@jeffluo9591]

I'm considering upgrade my Batis 135 to the 135GM. The only hesitation is the weight and size because I travel a lot. 135GM is truly a great lens but the Batis is not bad either.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The Batis has lovely color and contrast. The size difference is not significant, but there is definitely a weight difference.

[@alexands1]

@@DustinAbbottTWI How do you see the color and contrast of the 135GM as compared with the Batis 135?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

The problem is that the Batis 135 was my very first Sony review (on the a7RII), so it's been too long to have a good frame of reference. There's no question the GM is sharper, but the Batis does have lovely rendering.

[@alexands1]

@@DustinAbbottTWI I understand. Thanks.

[@stefantotev]

135 is a favorite focal length of mine ever since I got my canon 135L few years ago and I was desperately waiting for Sony to announce one. I’ve had the Batis 135 before I got the GM and I have to agree there’s always something special in the way Zeiss renders colors and micro contrast. The GM is heavier, but not that much. I think it is worth it to switch. I don’t regret it.

[@marcoblondus3204]

optical quality difference with the sigma 135 1.8?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

There's not a huge difference optically between the two. The Sony is bit better corrected, but I definitely prefer the whole package of the Sony (AF is much better).

[@powerlurker]

truely a 10 out of 10 lens

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Agreed.

[@fotospablogil]

Hey Dustin, really nice review as always! I’m new to Sony (coming from canon) I brought an A7r IVa with the 24-105 f4 G. (I’m hybrid shooter) I have a Canon 24mm f.14 L ii and a Canon 50mm f1.2 L. I’m debating between this Sony 135 or the Sigma 105 f1.4… I do a lot of outdoors material, mixing people portraits and animals as well. I’m looking for a unique character lens that gives me the possibility of do full frame and also hard crops with the 61mp sensor… If you had to recommend one o those two lenses, which one should be? Best regards from Argentina!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I would go for the 135GM if you can afford it. It is an unbelievably good lens.

[@fotospablogil]

@@DustinAbbottTWI thanks for your quick response Sir! Will do!

[@MFGE89]

Hey Dustin, I'm really glad you reviewed this lens since I'm evaluating a purchase. The issue for me is the price. I know it's worth every penny but I could buy a Sigma for 990 euros and the sony for 1550. Is the price difference really justified? Thanks for your videos and have a good day.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hi Marco, I think it is (I know that's not what you want to hear). The Sony focuses so much better and you'll find it more user friendly. Save a little longer and treat yourself to the best!

[@BokehMaster_]

One lens that is keeping me from switching to Leica. This lens is exceptionally good

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

It really is.

[@StandardYoutuberExcellent]

Leica 😮😮😮😮😮😮

[@manojpathiravasam852]

Outstanding review again. I am a little bit sad that this sony beat my favorite milvus 135mm f2 lens in resolution. However i have noticed that, sony portrait image is noticeably warmer in tone than the zeiss image. Anyway i think Tamron will also release a 135mm f1.8 or slightly faster lens in not too distant future and that lens may have the best bokeh considering Tamron is known for thier beautiful bokeh

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Interesting, as I actually thought the opposite when comparing images. The Zeiss looked a bit warmer.

[@sadenb]

Sony is really growing as an optics company

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That's true.

[@florinG]

nice weather.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

If you like cold wind, sure :)

[@christianvolkner2028]

So is this lens even better than the Otus 100?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I don't think the rendering is quite as special as the Otus, but this lens is SO more usable and yes, probably sharper.

[@christianvolkner2028]

Dustin Abbott I heard that the new Panasonic 50/1.4 and Sigma40/1.4 are also better than the Otus55. But I also heard that there’s a possibility that these lenses are getting some “image processing” even before raw. But nonetheless these lenses perform on extreme levels, so with the exception of AF it probably doesn’t matter much, if one lens is better than the other.

[@leonardoiglesias2394]

The size of a bag is important????????

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

That depends on the photographer and their needs. To me, it did.

[@Celestialrob]

My favorite lens

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I completely get it!

[@Celestialrob]

@@DustinAbbottTWI stunning sharpness and rendering. Right up there with my old Canon 300mm f2.8L IS. the last two G master primes (the 24mm) have been huge hits for me. I wish they would update the 85/1.4.

[@kemalraik]

Hi Dustin; excellent review as per usual! My current go to lens for outdoor portraiture is the 85mm 1.4 GM lens. As I have never used a 135mm 1.8, I was wondering if you would recommend this lens over the 85 1.4 for the "3D pop", i.e., background separation, in spite of the smaller aperture (albeit admittedly longer focal length)? Also, based on your sample images, the bokeh of the 135 GM seemed a little more "nervous" compared to the 85 GM which, to my eyes, seems to give a slightly more buttery and "dreamy" look. I don't know if you would agree?

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

I do agree, though I would personally take the 135 over the 85, personally. I think it is the more special lens.

[@AlexD12345]

Thank you for clarifying that even super expensive top of the line Sony will never match Zeiss Milvus. Great video!

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Hmmm...interesting takeaway, though I'm not sure that's the point I made.

[@Acura1NSX]

You are incorrect on your statement that the body of this sony 135mm is magnesium alloy, it's actually a plastic which is what keeps it lighter in weight.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Are you certain? I got that information from the Sony website.

[@Acura1NSX]

@@DustinAbbottTWI Absolutely... same for the 70-200mm f2.8 OSS II as well.

[@nat-lj8kt]

@@DustinAbbottTWI it is magnesium alloy, Roger Cicala took it apart. Plastic is outside casing. Most big pro lens internals have some metal alloy to protect the glass. Magnesium alloy is very good. Of course it is thin and not built like a classic Zeiss or a big fat Milvus.

[@pablovi77]

Amazing lens, great review! Too expensive for me.

[@DustinAbbottTWI]

Fair enough. It is very expensive