If this video was helpful to you, you could support met with a Super Thanks or a sub! :) Timestamps: 00:00 Monster Intro 00:28 Overview & Specs 01:58 Megapixels 02:40 Photography and options 03:34 Burst 04:31 Body & Build 05:25 Inputs 06:11 Buttons 07:21 Weather resistance 08:11 Video 09:39 Video crop 10:22 LOG 11:58 LOG video samples 12:59 Workflow 13:28 SD-cards 14:11 Vlogging & Mic test 15:06 Overheating 15:38 Battery (life) 16:17 ISO and noise 16:56 Autofocus
@zaporoshti33923 ай бұрын
Sony has more number of lenses but for quality Fuji has more to cover the areas from 16 to 140 mm with f/2.8 aperture. Fujifilm is the only brand that covers the same lengths which are equivalent to 24-200 mm on full frame cameras with f 2.8 on aspc cameras.
@Kellard_279 ай бұрын
Really great comparison! I appreciate the in-depth information on sd cards they require these information aren't immediately and easily available
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Thank you for the appreciation! Yeah, the SD card issue with the A6700 bothered me a bit, so I thought it was important to mention :)
@TwoTimesRmedia9 ай бұрын
Great video. Lots of information. I know this took you a while so I appreciate your hard work.
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Thank you for the recognition, and I'm happy to hear it helped! :)
@frigidandspellbound86128 ай бұрын
Excellent video, helped me cement my decision to get the X-S20. Very informative and clear you put a lot of effort into this. Subscribed.
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful and thanks for the sub!
@capturedbykareem5 ай бұрын
This is not an over exaggeration, for 72 hours I've been on KZbin nonstop deciding which new hybrid camera to purchase (I shoot fashion editorial work and I want to able to film campaign videos). I've looked everywhere and finally got down to these two. I've been shocked at all the information about fuji film (I currently use canon) and your video has finally helped me choose. Thank you so much for the in depth comparison and the jokes in between for us ADD people (I literally LOL'd at the crop joke). Subbed!
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
Thank you for your great compliment! I just wished my video would have popped up before you started your 72h journey, as it would've saved you quite some time haha! And thank you for noticing my shitty jokes, motivates me to keep making them xD. So, which camera are you going for?
@nubiroru1325 ай бұрын
So just curious did you choose XS20?
@deepanshurai48635 ай бұрын
Which camera did you end up purchasing?
@Studiotek4 ай бұрын
@@deepanshurai4863 I sincerely hope he bought the Fuji
@robinfro36102 ай бұрын
Hope he answers anytime soon
@ironfur91509 ай бұрын
I went back and forth between these two cameras, they are both really good APS-C options. I did a bunch of my own testing and since I planned to use one of these as my B-cam to do long 4k recordings I did some testing on overheating. In a warm room the A6700 does tend to overheat easier. I tried out both cameras and went with the X-S20, the autofocus misses more than my A7iv and I wish it were weather sealed but I do have a lot of fun with the X-S20. Either would be a good option, I would probably recommend the A6700 if photography is more the use case. One thing that impressed me was I had a few things that annoyed me with the Fuji and I noticed that there was a newer firmware. After updating the firmware a bunch of the issues were fixed. Given Sony is kind of lackluster with the firmware support, that was a little reason to go with the Fuji. Not sure if it was mentioned but the built in flash that the Fuji has (tbf the Sony has the multi interface hotshoe) I actually used the built in Fuji flash to reflect off ice crystals in the air and it made a beautiful picture. Good review, got a sub from me!
@ironfur91509 ай бұрын
Ah nevermind, you did mention the X-S20 has a built in flash.
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
@@ironfur9150 Thank you for the sub! The Flash is unique indeed, especially since most cameras don't have this anymore. The overheating might seem less important, until it starts overheating. In that case, it is nice to know you can add the additional fan to the X-S20. Just in case; I have separate reviews on these 2 cameras as well! Where can I see your crystal picture? Which camera do you use most nowadays?
@cheesedrinkal9 ай бұрын
fujifilm announced that a big autofocus update is coming for the XS20 and more cameras in spring 2024
@ironfur91509 ай бұрын
@@cheesedrinkal Yes, I saw that too. Very much looking forward to subject tracking in video, that's been a pretty big advantage that Sony has had for awhile now.
@donnergodd17815 ай бұрын
@ironfur9150 could you give more feedback about your user experience with the X-S20 so far? So far I'm about to buy either the A6700 or the X-S20. The most appealing feauture for the A6700 for me is the weather-sealing and the Autofocus. No doubt I would love not having to worry about moisture, light rain and dust/sand while traveling. On the other hand the most appealing feature for the X-S20 are the film simulations, as most users report the "creativity" it brings out and probably the better lenses of Fuji (especially the XF 70-300 compared to SEL 70-350G). What has changed since the video are the prices. I could go with the kit lense + 70-350 for the A6700 under 2k new (or as good as new lenses) while the X-S20 with the kit lense + 70-300 would be beyond 2.4k in Germany.. The discounts on the A6700 are huge atm and this makes the X-S20 with the lacking weather-sealing not that appealing anymore...
@stop6195 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comparison. The difference in focus acquisition at 14:40 sealed the deal for me.
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
I am very happy to hear it helped you decide!
@harizsharizal31159 ай бұрын
This is the best comparison video of this lot in the internet. Period.
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Thank you for your kind comment!
@ItzelOcchipinti59 ай бұрын
Very good and complete information!!!
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Thank you very much! I hope it helped!
@alexeipg9 ай бұрын
The comparable sony lens to the xf 16-55mm is the sony 16-55 f/2.8 G aps-c lens, not the full-frame 24-70mm GM. With the 16-55 G lens, the total price for both cameras would be basically identical.
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Yeah that would've been a better comparison, lens wise. Still the Sony lens is $100 pricier, where the body is too. So it adds up in the end.
@aritraroy78417 ай бұрын
16 50 2.8 Sigma Much cheaper with equivalent quality
@gillesmatheronpro7 ай бұрын
May I add one major information ? Thank you... The Sony 16-55 mm f/2.8 G is a diamond ! When I purchased my FX30, the initial idea was to buy the Sigma. And I started my search for camera/lens some 5 months earlier, so time was on my side and I had plenty of it because I already had a good camera, then could have waited some more if needed. When in the shop, there was plenty of choice on the lenses side. I had my computer, with my own images, and my existing camera. With the FX30, I filmed several sequences, inside and outside, snapped several RAW images as well. Had a look on my screen, and decided to go home to take more time. But also to verify what I thought was me having the wrong impressions. Well no... all of the tests I read and watched confirmed it : this Sony mid-range zoom is rated "G" when it should be a "GM", and by a large margin. It is absolutely superb, from edge to edge, from largest to smallest aperture, with all switches and controls, it gets recognized by Sony cameras and works better than 3rd party lenses for this reason. As soon as I finished processing/correcting my first portrait (because it also is a great photographic tool) I stopped and stared at my screen, speechless and stunned. Sigma produced a nice little do-it-all lens, no doubt. Sony created a unique and nearly perfect photographic tool, on par with lenses sold three times its price. Do the test yourself, consider all elements, and you'll see why this "little" zoom is a GMaster in a smaller shell.
@alexeipg7 ай бұрын
@@gillesmatheronprosuper helpful! I’ve been tempted to switch to the 16-55mm. My only reservations are price and that I wish it had an aperture ring.
@birthdayakki24 күн бұрын
Thanks a million. Really good breakdown of various aspects of both cameras.
@cameradeals24 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! I am very happy to hear that! :)
@ramonarias12348 ай бұрын
An extensive and very informative video, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I wanted to clarify that with the latest update, my XS20 can also track subjects on video and it's great. I am in love, I recommend it without hesitation
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! That is a very important update indeed! Thanks for sharing :)
@MrRealtf6 ай бұрын
Will it be good for a KZbin content creation camera?
@cameradeals6 ай бұрын
@@MrRealtf Yes it is. I film all my KZbin reviews with the X-S20. Tip: don't use the eye-focus, as it will start hunting. I am using the face recognition. The A6700 has better autofocus and will be great in any mode.
@victorbmadslund9 ай бұрын
So what would you pick?
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
If the cameras were priced the same, and you could get the lenses for the same price (and quality), I'd pick the Sony A6700. I love slow motion filming and I find myself occasionally in dusty environments, so the weather sealing is important to me. I own the X-S20 as well, and I am in love with the filters. But in all honesty, I am so used to RAW-shooting and editing, that I have difficulties changing to filter shooting. In 2018, I had a fast computer built, but it doesn't keep up with the 360Mb/s files; therefore I need proxies, which is annoying. But hey, that's life (and tech). Which one has your preference?
@victorbmadslund9 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals the film simulations are also the main factor from the Fuji that interests me atm… but the weather sealing and the a6700 in general is what I’m attracted the most to … so I’m gonna go for the a6700 with the sigma 18-50, which will be my first real camera, so probably more than plenty… I just hope straight out of camera pics are still pretty
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
@@victorbmadslund The Sigma 18-50mm is the f/2.8 Contemporary right? Good lens choice! And yes, the photos out of camera are very nice indeed! Have fun!
@victorbmadslund9 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals yes exactly! Thank you 🙏
@bradleyanderson2477 ай бұрын
Been using a GX9 since around the time it was released. The current m43 bodies aren't especially attractive to me, since I want relatively small and light for travel/street type use. Recently bought an A6700. Just like the body size and style more than the Fujis. Also bought the Sigma 18-50 and 10-18 f/2.8 lenses which are remarkably small and light. So far I'm happy with my choice. But the choice certainly depends on one's priorities.
@harry54ck9 ай бұрын
Thanks for your great job! I know it was a hassle so thank you! What significantly lacks here is the low light performance comparison. It is one of the main questions for people choosing apsc cameras and it was the least disclosed. No comparison of lowlight in video modes. Also it is a great question whose log has better dynamic range. This question also remains unanswered. Hope you will cover these too. And I'm begging you to compare Sony a6700 with Canon R8. Noone did it, hope you will break this conspiracy. Thank you again and will be waiting for updates from you!
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Thank you! For photo, I did an ISO and noise test, which you can see at 16:17. I will release a separate video where I do the same test with video. The dynamic range of both cameras is 14 stops, but you are right, I did not test this by looking at graphs. I tested and reviewed the Canon EOS R8 as well (only written), but for me, it is not a video camera at all. It does have 4K 60fps UHD, but no IBIS. I see it more as a beginner full frame camera for photography, with some video options, which you outgrow quick because of the lack of dials and options. You can read it here: www.cameradealsonline.com/review/canon-eos-r8/
@harry54ck3 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals Tell please your thoughts, how different is the low light performance between Sny a6700 and Canon R8? I understand that one is apsc, another is full frame and the difference should be obvious but how huge is the difference to your opinion? According to your feelings
@cameradeals3 ай бұрын
@harry54ck I think the eos r8 low light performances on photography were quite impressive. It starts struggling with video, though. As it has a full frame sensor it does capture more light tha. The apsc a6700 sensor.
@harry54ck3 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals you said Canon EOS R8 is struggling with video. What do you mean saying it? It struggles in terms of low light performance, overheating, what are the technical issues?
@DanFlynn5 ай бұрын
Super well done and extensive comparison, ty for this! Very helpful
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! I am happy to hear it was helpful!
@CakirMansur8 ай бұрын
best VS video ever seen with this two cameras ! thank you
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@Skaterman24139 ай бұрын
The LCD of the x-s20 has 1.84m dots vs 1.04m dots on the a6700.
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
You are right, sir! I must have forgotten to change the stats when I was copying the text. Well spotted!
@Skaterman24139 ай бұрын
Also pretty sure the Sony has less than a 1x magnification for the EVF (like 0.7x or smth)
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
1.07x
@Skaterman24139 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals yes but the 35mm equivalent is 0.71x for the a6700, the x-s20 has a 0.93x magnification or 0.62x 35mm equivalent
@Veered2Train9 ай бұрын
Thank You
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
You are very welcome, thank you for watching!
@XraySuper2 ай бұрын
I am doubting between xs20 and xt50. What should I choose......
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
I have the X-T50 and the X-S20 here right now, and I'm making a comparison video, which will be out soon! So you could sub in order to receive an update when it's online :)
@XraySuper2 ай бұрын
@cameradeals nice sub method! But yes, I can't wait for that video.
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
@@XraySuper haha, I would only ask for that sub if I'd actually be working on something new. Which I am! 😀
@MossPalone2 ай бұрын
A sony
@ftk-alt3 ай бұрын
actually the sony has their own sony 16-55 f2.8 which is around 1k USD (amazon us) so you may actually cut off 500 and both would be 2.6k USD. if we talk about sigma 18-50mm, it would save even more cost. sd card depends on user, but definitely worth to get the higher buffer speed.
@zaporoshti33923 ай бұрын
if only Sony was not sold with kit lenses in my country. that is an additional price to pay on top of that 16-55 f2.8 lense which I think is a must-have for an ASPC camera. only sony and fuji has this lense, canon r7 owners can use previous EF lense and adapter to achieve the same aperture and focal lengths.
@ftk-alt3 ай бұрын
@@zaporoshti3392 sigma 18 50 now support canon rfs
@cameradeals3 ай бұрын
Good one!
@maartjeth97122 күн бұрын
I a going to backpack. Which one do you think is better? I want to make portraits of the locals but also vlogging to capture memories.
@cameradealsКүн бұрын
Hi Maartje, both are great for that. The X-S20 has a dedicated vlog option on the dial, which pulls up simplified big buttons on the screen, good for vlogging and filming yourself. The autofocus of the A6700 is better, the X-S20 has its viewfinder placed on a more natural place. The A6700 can 4K 120fps slowmotion and doesn't need the fastest cards to film on > The A6700 requires V90 SD-cards in order to film in high quality. When making your choice, also look at which lens(es) you want to bring and what they cast and weigh. Make sure to buy multiple ORIGINAL batteries, as they will last longer. I would suggest a hand strap as well, for steadiness and safety. I will share this very old video of my old channel, where I talk about backpacking with a camera. The gear is old, but principles the same. Maybe there are some new things in it for you: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mqmqZqGMd8anjac&ab_channel=YRegisterProductions Please let me know if I can help you with anything else :)
@meqzz7 ай бұрын
if i was to consider a camera body of a similar price to these but geared more towards photography, what would you recommend?
@cameradeals6 ай бұрын
You could look into the Fujifilm X-T50 (my review of it will be out soon! )
@jairnxavier2 ай бұрын
great video!
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@bassyey6 ай бұрын
Which one would you pick for a first timer owner of a camera? I'll mainly be recording myself playing guitar/bass for covers and all related stuff. I hope these two doesn't overheat because when recording covers, sometimes retakes take a long time! I need my takes to be perfect so I do it again and again. In the future, I'll probably be taking photos of my friends playing in a band. I have the budget for one of these two, so I don't need to go lower tier. Though I'm leaning Fujifilm, just because of the looks lol. Again, I'm clueless about cameras.
@cameradeals6 ай бұрын
Hi! Both of them are great for shooting video. Sony clearly has better autofocus than Fujifilm, though. Overheating will be less likely in lower resolutions, but if you’ll go for the highest bitrates in 4K, it is more likely to happen. Also check which one is in stock, as it might make the choice easier. I think the Fujifilm is easier to use for a first time owner. :)
@JRFilmsAMStudio19 күн бұрын
Great bro but which one is the best what's your opinion... Reply pls...
@cameradeals17 күн бұрын
Thanks! It really depends what you want to use them for. They're both great for video, but the a6700 has 4k 120fps slowmotion. The X-S20 might be a bit better for photography and feels more like a proper camera. What is it you want to use it for ?
@JRFilmsAMStudio17 күн бұрын
@cameradeals thanks, first of all xs20's look is so good And cooling fan, I m all rounder maker sx 20 for only photos for me m like Videos are any option I'm used ux90 panasonic, I wnt only photography.. Battry is big size, view finder is center top, open gate, sensor is powerfull, may be all is ok x20 Sony 6700 is good, But heat issue, and a most viewfinder is corner no good...
@cameradeals16 күн бұрын
@JRFilmsAMStudio reading this is sounds like you should go for the xs20! :)
@JRFilmsAMStudio16 күн бұрын
@cameradeals thanksss bro and a lens pls all in one...? Thanks for reply
@cheesedrinkal9 ай бұрын
van you make a handheld stabilization comparaison of these 2 camera, compare with ibis, without ibis and with gyro data and processed after thanks
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Hi! For now I can't, since the brands send me the cameras to test (for free and without directions of what I say about it). I own the x-S20, but not the A6700.
@CarlosPerez-dh6dg5 ай бұрын
@cameradeals which one is better for casual photography? Travel ?. Nothing professional ! Thanks and regards :)
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
From these two in the video, I would say the X-S20 for Photography. You could also look into the new Xt50.
@mathewanaya2757Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video! Answered every question I have. Only thing tipping me Sony is weather sealing & AF. How important is weather sealing really? I'd probably not even take out a weather sealed camera in the rain, but it does gets quite dusty where I am. Everything else for me leans towards X-S20 as I want a video camera I can grow into (eventually external 12 bit). I'm also considering a used X-H2s which would have weather sealing but is quite more expensive. I mainly shoot cars, portraits here and there, and sports (AF has let me down). I also want to lean into cinematic style vlogs & travel vidoes. Basically looking for a one size fits all solution. Thanks!
@cameradealsАй бұрын
Thank you for your kind words! Looking at what you are looking for, especially the sports part, I might go for the Sony as it has way better and faster autofocus. Personally, I barely take my waterproof cameras out, but I did film a lot in deserts, meaning lots of dust and sand. In that case, you do want a weather sealed camera, so the dust doesn't get in. Might be even worse for your camera than few water drops. If you think you will be in the dust a lot, I would upgrade to a weather sealed camera. Hope this helps :)
@mathewanaya2757Ай бұрын
@@cameradeals Thanks for the reply! After stopping by a camera store, they had wonderful deals and I went on a special sale day. Felt both bodies in hand, the X-S20's screen although better in resolution, in my opinions feels "cheaper" with thicker bezels, and I couldn't see much of a difference. There were also Sigma and Tamron reps who let me try both the 18-50mm 2.8 and Tamron 17-70 2.8. Ended up trading in X-T30ii, 18-55, xc50-230(don't use), for an A6700, V90 card, sigma 18-50. I really, really wanted the Fuji to be my next move, but logically the A6700 was the better pick for my use case. I'll say your video really helped me out soo much. Of all the reviews I've seen yours was the most comprehensive. I had literally 0 questions for the salesman, I knew the facts and just wanted a feel of different combos. Once again thanks so much!
@mathewanaya2757Ай бұрын
@@cameradeals Also realized, I can also "grow" into the Sony, and with a direct FF upgrade path as well. Also I don't think I'd ever use 12 bit, feels overkill
@SiampurpleАй бұрын
which LUT did you use for the grading? It looks so good
@cameradealsАй бұрын
I use a combination of The Preset Factory Luts (loaded in via Lumitri) and Film Convert. Normally, I put both lots on 40/60% or 50/50. I play around with the according to the scene and style.
@EytianoStylez7 ай бұрын
Did you manage to collect any footage in Malawi, could you share the link. I would like to watch the video.
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
Yes, you can watch it here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2fQeXaGnc-mnq8 (Shot on GH5s)
@joaogouveia24038 ай бұрын
Excellent video!
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Thank you very much!
@andisantoso41558 ай бұрын
How about Dynamic Range on photo and videos in lowlight and highlight?
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Good one. I should make another video about that.
@chrissnyder44397 ай бұрын
I ended up going with the A6700. Yes, I already have Sony lenses, but not opposed to switching if it's worth it. The big reason though, is because I could get the A6700, while the X-S20 is nowhere to be found.
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
Yeah, it's so weird the X-S20 is sold out everywhere. It does make the choice a bit easier though :)
@neilprofitt13813 ай бұрын
There’s a reason for that. The Fuji is magical.
@kucingmanisss2 ай бұрын
I think i will still choose a6700 for vlogging. Is it right decision?
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
Both are great for it. What are your reasons for choosing the A6700?
@djkidii2 ай бұрын
good fuji have shit af for video
@JASONJAMESMARTIN7 ай бұрын
I would love to see a video on low light performance. Photo, video, etc
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
I just did the ISO tests. :)
@glaxouszanofi48522 ай бұрын
Something additional to consider is that a6700 records video with gyro data. This means you have additional option to apply gimbal level stabilization to your video shots which is technically better than a camera's Ibis + eis combo. Often overlooked in comparison, but I do say it is a big factor to me as this feature alone keeps me from buying a gimbal just to shoot fluid and non-jittery motion.
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
Good one!
@GhettoFabulousFILMS9 ай бұрын
HI MATE, LOVE THIS TEST, WOULD YOU RECOMMEND TO OVER EXPOSE FLOG 2 LIKE WE NORMALLY DO WITH SLOG3?
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
Yes, a stop or two is good. You could always turn on the Log assist and see how it turns out. Give you a good idea how to expose in the future and in different light circumstances.
@rezabehroozi25959 ай бұрын
thanks
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
You are welcome!
@alvarolachner6 ай бұрын
I’m a photographer and I have the Sony a6600. I’m thinking of either switching to full frame Sony A7IV or switching to the Fuji XT-5. I’m attracted to Fuji for its retro aesthetics, its film simulations and its “vintage like” color science. Should I stay Sony or go Fuji?
@cameradeals6 ай бұрын
As we speak, I am working on my X-T5 and A7IV review, where I compare them (among Lumix GH7 and Nikon Z6 III reviews). The X-T5 is a great camera and could be a great replacement for full frame models. The A7IV is a great all-round camera, and you can never go wrong. If you lean strongly on the color science, I would recommend the Fujifilm. Also look into lenses, as full frame lenses are costly.
@lumenone16985 ай бұрын
Hello! Thank you for the video! What about overheating? I have a problems with it? Is that a normal to overheat in 12 min in room temp 24C? :(
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
Aah that is too bad! With which camera? And which settings does it overheat that fast?
@lumenone16985 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals it's fujifilm x-s20, 4k 59 fps 🥺 is this a defect or normal? I have 6 years old camera and it's never overheated... I really don't know what to do
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
@lumenone1698 when you film in 4k 60fps, do you turn the fan into boost mode? Is the placed in a cage?
@YunusEmreSevuk8 ай бұрын
Is Fujifilm good enough for video and photo work? I'm afraid there will be a heating problem. Does it really heat up like the XT4? Because I want to use it in promotional films, events, concerts, model, product photography, etc.
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Yes and no. Yes as in quality and options, no in overheating possibilities. The good thing is that you can attach the external fan, which might be a game changer.
@YunusEmreSevuk8 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals I mean, it's available for work, isn't it, because my budget is enough for it. Actually, I wanted to buy a Sony a7s2, but there is a lot of price difference between them. Xs20 doesn't disappoint in the photo and video works, does it?
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
@YunusEmreSevuk Yeah definitely! The upside of the A7sii is the fact it is full frame and might deliver better quality in low light.
@YunusEmreSevuk8 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals Yes, it is true, but can similar photo-videography works be done with Fuji?
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
@@YunusEmreSevuk I think the X-S20 can get you better video resolution results even. But the A7S-series are almost unbeatable in low-light performance. One of the reasons is because it has huge pixels, but only 12MP. So, for photography you won't get big resolutions.
@aniketpawar61452 ай бұрын
I work on raptors that soars quite high. Until now I have used P950 for its zoom. I want to upgrade to mirrorless to capture birds in flight more effectively. Any suggestions which one of these 2 would be ideal? Really love the colours and higher FPS in fuji but Sony's autofocus is to die for in my field.
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
Looking at what you need it for, I'd recommend the A6700 as the AF is just way better :)
@Atpibapa9 ай бұрын
Fujifilm the best
@DragonPlayerTV9 ай бұрын
Great video. Rotterdam is just so photogenic. One question: I was getting advice in a pro shop today, because I wanted to get the XS-20. He told me that for videography I should for sure take the a6700, because of the WAY better autofocus and WAAAYYY better IBIS. Can you confirm that? I was hoping that the shaky IBIS got fixed with software updates already.
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
The autofocus of the A6700 is better than on the X-S20, and on the X-S20 I notice it is searching for focus from time to time. I think IBIS performance is more or less the same on both cameras. Now, I am not used to using ibis or autofocus on cameras and therefore think it doesn't really matter. It is good to practice your manual focus pulling. But of course it depends what you use the camera for. If it is for vlogging, the autofocus of the A6700 is better, but the X-S20 has good AF too.
@josephareyuna88584 ай бұрын
A6700 VS CANON R8 for video?
@cameradeals4 ай бұрын
I probably won't do that comparison 😕
@josephareyuna88584 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals But based on your experience, which one is better?
@cameradeals4 ай бұрын
@@josephareyuna8858 Good question. I filmed with both and would choose the A6700 over the R8. Of course, the R8 has a full frame sensor and no crop, but way less options in film. The A6700 has the 4K 120fps option, where the R8 maxes out at 4K 60fps. Quality wise you can get a lot fromr the R8 as well, but the camera in general focusses more on photography. So it really depends. If video is your second hobby, the R8 could be perfect for you, but if you really go for film i'd still choose the A6700, as it has way more options to adjust the video settings to your perfect workflow :)
@josephareyuna88584 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals spectacular!! Thank you very much for your humility!! you gained a subscriber
@cameradeals4 ай бұрын
@@josephareyuna8858 I am very happy to hear that! Please let me know if you have more questions:)
@TheOtakuJournalАй бұрын
Hello, Can you tell me which LUT did you use for grading the Log Profiles. I have been looking for this kind of looks.
@cameradealsАй бұрын
I use a combination of The Preset Factory Luts (loaded in via Lumitri) and Film Convert. Normally, I put both lots on 40/60% or 50/50. I play around with the according to the scene and style.
@TheOtakuJournalАй бұрын
@@cameradeals Thank you
@olegvolik24889 ай бұрын
It is possible to use eterna with Flog 2, just apply Fujifilm conversion lut
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Let me try that. Thank you
@RikMaxSpeed8 ай бұрын
Nicely produced video. 👏 Being stuck to 35mm, though it is my favourite focal length, is a big turn-off for me, but all that’s moot as the camera is made of unobtainium!
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
8 ай бұрын
Many thanks, your sub is earned! Being a video guy mainly, I got the A6700 in the end. It's annoying cos the Fuji is a nicer body I think and a cooler device all round, but the Sony AF is just voodoo compared to everyone else's. It's kind of frustrating cos I do have a blackmagic recorder and could record BRAW too with Fuji, and plenty of the specs of the XS20 are just better and the image is very nice. But in the end, the main thing over the years that has cost me shots in both video and stills has been AF, and when people view your images they don't see the specs, but they do see if it's in focus or not 🤣 If only Fuji could nail the AF properly I would have gone that way...
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Your choice and reasons make sense!
8 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals It is kinda frustrating cos the Fuji has a bit more soul. If I didn't need the AF for work I'd have gone Fuji tbh .
@Josecunyat8 ай бұрын
They are making updates and putting ai into it. Lets see how all this unfolds…
@samuelalexander3215 ай бұрын
2:33 i guess the fujifilm sensor quite dirty with smudge of oil
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
I treat my sensors with hamburger grease. 🍔
@hasankaragoz3 ай бұрын
What's the point of comparing a prime lens and a variable focal length lens?
@cameradeals3 ай бұрын
Hi! Nowhere in this review I compare these 2 lenses to each other. The only part where I compare, is about photography and megapixels, and I clearly disclaim that it isn't a fair fight. The majority of this review is about the cameras and options itself. It were just the lenses I had available. I hope you enjoyed the rest of the review though, as I spent a lot of time making it.
@hasankaragoz3 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals My advice to you is to ask for lenses from companies. Fujifilm is a very flexible company in this regard. I can even personally take cameras and lenses for review.
@rosinante00726 ай бұрын
Xs-20 vs a7iii?
@cameradeals6 ай бұрын
I don't have the a7iii
@khaleel_as7 ай бұрын
there is a problem here. You're comparing image quality using good lens on one side and bad lens on the other side. I switched from Sony A7iii to Fuji X-s20. I can tell you if you want amazing colors to start with or you like filmic looks, then Fuji is no brainer, I wouldnt go any other brand. It is also affordable system with affordable lenses. The only time you wanna go Sony is if you dont care too much about colors or style and you just wanna take a picture of something and move on. Sony is a bit more reliable in terms of focus. Dont get me wrong Fuji also reliable but not the eye AF, you must use single point AF, which feels like a bit behind. Personally I am fine using single point AF and dont need eye AF for photos. So bottom line, you want affordable system with stunning colors, and a bit behind focus system, go fuji. want want reliable system, a bit more expensive, colors are okay but something is off about them, then go Sony you want decent colors, very expensive, and reliable system ? go canon.
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
Hi, thanks for your reaction and the review of the lens you use. I do disclaim I use a better lens on the Sony, plus the lens I use for the Fujifilm isn't bad lens. It's actually very good lens for its price, f-stop and versatility. Cheers! Also, i say I'm looking at megapixels, not picture quality.
@butchgo89308 ай бұрын
I have Sony lenses. I’ll buy the a6700. In similar manner, Fuji users go for the Fuji.
@cameradeals8 ай бұрын
Yeah that makes sense
@gab_agu4 ай бұрын
I traded in my XS-20 w/ SIGMA 18-50 for an A6700 w/ SIGMA 18-50.. Did i make the wrong choice? My heart says yes but my brain/logic says no.
@cameradeals4 ай бұрын
I think both cameras are great, and it really depends on why you traded them and what you want to use it for.
@ronaldlee35377 ай бұрын
I have the Sony A6700 and my primary usage is photography with video second. In outdoor light the it is very good, but in extremely dim light it hunts and I have taken a some photos that were blurred because it was out of focus, and I am also using the orange focusing aid light. This focusing problem also happens in my A6600. I have occasionally taken photos at ISO 100,000. The photo are acceptable.
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
This issue really depends on the lenses you use and the circumstances. I've used cameras like the Canon EOS R5, Nikon Z8 and Z9 and those will hunt as well at a certain point (when there is not enough light). Normally, I would recommend turning off autofocus if there is not enough light and just focus manually.
@sneharkaporia5477 ай бұрын
Fujifilm cameras are extremely hard to get nowadays, XS20 is out of stock or backordered literally everywhere! Availability should also be a key point for effective comparison. Now, I'm stuck whether to buy a6700 or wait for god knows how much longer to get the XS20!
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
I didn't know the XS20 is on backorder. It also depends where you live, and it could be completely different per country. Where I live, there are plenty. When I compared these cameras, they were in stock in the US and European countries, and I can't look into the future. So, for that point, it's still an effective comparison.
@sneharkaporia5477 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals Thank you for your reply. I am in US at the moment and Fuji XS20, X100VI and even the XT30 II are out of stock everywhere which makes me sad. Probably because of this unavailability I'm going to go with a6700. This is going to be first camera, so I hope I'll have a good experience.
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
The A6700 is a great camera as well. The XT50 just got released as well. Will do a review on it as soon as I get a review model ;)
@brennanIX7 ай бұрын
@sneharkaporia547 I've been comparing these 2 and prices, and I don't think I've looked at any retailer where the Fuji was NOT in stock. Maybe some, but just clicking links on the first page of Google, it's in stock. I take that back. Sometimes it shows but it's "backorder" in the fine print. Still, most places it's 2-5 day shipping and I'm stock. Both cameras are currently in my cart at best buy atm
@sneharkaporia5477 ай бұрын
@@brennanIX Just tell me one website where XS20 with 15-45 is in stock
@cheesedrinkal7 ай бұрын
Since you haven't tested the ibis , can you do a video of the handheld stabilization of the XS20? with a non OIS lens, when walking panning vlogging and all,
@cameradeals7 ай бұрын
No. :)
@robertluxamafreethinker3 ай бұрын
It seems you've forgotten the most important part: "Video low light comparison". But, great review!!
@cameradeals3 ай бұрын
It is true I didn't make shots outside in lowlight, I did do an ISO test at 16:17
@robertluxamafreethinker3 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals Ok! Great! Thank🙏🏽
@Kunaltries5 ай бұрын
I think you forgot to mention trains man
@cameradeals5 ай бұрын
Oh no! how could i've missed that one!? xD
@Kunaltries5 ай бұрын
@@cameradeals 😂😂
@knotingspecific2 ай бұрын
Of course the XS20
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
What made you pick that one?
@djkidii2 ай бұрын
if you dont use af pick xs20 :D
@RobustArid3796 ай бұрын
Full
@cameradeals6 ай бұрын
Good!
@Quattro50819 ай бұрын
I think the X-S20 have automatic subject recognition....but only in auto mode!
@cameradeals9 ай бұрын
I've never used the auto mode and were able to use it as well :)
@bluerabbit12362 ай бұрын
Don't get either one. 6700 overheats and Xs20 has terrible AF. Even a 30 minute non stopmpodcast recording indoors will cause a6700 to overheat it's ridiculous. If you're planning to do any outdoor commercial gigs or weddings etc these cameras will cost you jobs! Don't believe the bs youtubers spew on these channels to cash in on the sponsor money.
@cameradeals2 ай бұрын
Hi. I'm sorry to see you feel so bad about it. 1. It is good to know it costs me more time and money than I make of the channel. Which are literary a few dollars. I am making these reviews because I am passionate about them. No brand sponsors me, pays me or tells me what to say about the cameras. The sponsoring or affiliate links that you do find here, don't even make up for the money I spend on these reviews. 2. I wonder: have you actually tried both cameras for a long time? 3. These cameras are not meant for professional use, where you shoot commercials or weddings. Even then, the X-S20 would work fine as manual focus should be used. In professional work, you never use AF, always manual AF. Losing your job is on you. 4. I own the X-S20 and have used the A6700 a lot. So I know what I'm talking about with these, and other, cameras. 5. Just because you don’t like it, doesn't mean the world around you is telling bs. Not everything is a conspiracy or fake.
@lensofthenorth424 ай бұрын
The battery life info is totally false. A6700 lasts close to 2000 exposures for me.
@cameradeals4 ай бұрын
How can my experience with the battery be totally false? I also never mentioned the amount of exposures and mostly tested the battery with video, while your post is referring to exposures. 2000 exposures might be correct, I didn't test that and make no claims about it either.
@EricLouisYoung6 ай бұрын
there's no such thing as "Jpeg lossless"
@cameradeals6 ай бұрын
Hi! Could you point out the timestamp where I say this? I'm not able to find it. Thanks