Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Review - Should you still buy it in 2024?

Reviewing the well built Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS. Part of the holy trinity, the Sony 70-200mm has stood the test of time being a great performer and having an amazing size and weight. Use the 70-200mm for action, wildlife, portraits, even landscape. It is on the pricey side but stick with me through this video as we break down the build, value, performance and more! Should you still consider this 70-200mm F4 here in 2024? Lets find out!
Buy Sony 70-200mm F4 - amzn.to/32ywtSF (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gX1oFi (B&H)
I love talking tech, tutorials and techniques with you. Drop your comments and questions below. I Become a Member to get access to exclusive perks:
/ @stefanmalloch
See all links for my gear below.
Social Media
/ hypnotikphotography
/ hypnotikcamera
Business Contact
www.hypnotikphotography.com
[e-mail]
Below are affiliate links. If you want to buy these items or services through the following links, I will get a small kick back and it doesn't cost you anything. Thanks!
My Gear & Tools:
Amazon.com /.ca /.eu / B&H
Camera & Lenses:
Sony A7iii - amzn.to/2VZqO5M (Amazon) bhpho.to/3GWC1Ot (B&H)
Sony A7iv - amzn.to/3Tm2NU1 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VJ2svg (B&H)
Sony A6600 - amzn.to/2T02P76 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3B2WRI3 (B&H)
Sony 1.4X Teleconverter - amzn.to/303UMcL (Amazon) bhpho.to/3XMXE9N (B&H)
Sony 50mm F1.8 - amzn.to/2K0kkzb (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VE4a0L (B&H)
Samyang 85mm F1.4 - amzn.to/36J8wLf (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Vil4Ci (B&H)
Samyang 135mm F1.8 - amzn.to/3gJ4eNX (Amazon) bhpho.to/3uccV6w (B&H)
Sony 90mm F2.8 Macro - amzn.to/2oWUYe8 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OPiEsi (B&H)
Laowa 25mm Ultra Macro - amzn.to/3fCflb4 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3AYGEDG (B&H)
Sony FE 16-35 F4 - amzn.to/2VU2Ybs (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gNvavV (B&H)
Tamron 20-40mm F2.8 - amzn.to/3WvygF3 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3iqJZFc (B&H)
Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 - amzn.to/31WswJm (Amazon) bhpho.to/3UnFsRl (B&H)
Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 - amzn.to/3CgsGee (Amazon) bhpho.to/3AYaKaq (B&H)
Tamron 50-400mm - amzn.to/3GUUf2O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3uc6QXR (B&H)
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 ART - amzn.to/2ZTyOrj (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VEinLg (B&H)
Sony 100-400mm GM - amzn.to/2Gufk3O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3UhdGpn (B&H)
Spare 3rd Party Batteries for A7iii/A7IV - amzn.to/2RLytWH
Godox Flash - amzn.to/2WeDOo7 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3H3RUCD (B&H)
Flash Reciever - amzn.to/2Tah7Q1 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Vimn4a (B&H)
Insta360 One X2 - amzn.to/3rRnwRa (Amazon) bhpho.to/3iw8OQk (B&H)
DJI Pocket 2 -amzn.to/3lcjgIQ (Amazon) bhpho.to/3H1LgwK (B&H)
Drones
Mini 3 Pro here - amzn.to/3QbPKCX (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VryrQH (B&H)
The ONLY Camera Straps I use:
Peak Design Slide - amzn.to/2NZrCWd (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OPkOrU (B&H)
Peak Design Slide Light - amzn.to/2r9GVCE (Amazon) bhpho.to/3XQg1dV (B&H)
Tripods & Monopods
Peak Design Tripod - amzn.to/399Hj8d (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OY4vJx (B&H)
Vanguard Alta 263AT - amzn.to/2O0oLwc (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OSymTD (B&H)
JOBY GorillaPod 3K - amzn.to/2CZHSjO (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Fj9bql (B&H)
Slypod Pro - amzn.to/3g0iVfh (Amazon) bhpho.to/3GUWl2G (B&H)
Slypod E - amzn.to/3Eu2fWL (Amazon)
ND Filters
Freewell ALL IN 1 - amzn.to/3E6R4TN (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gQ3BSS (B&H)
Freewell VND Mist - amzn.to/3qmfm28 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3Uoxl6Z (B&H)
B&W 10 Stop - amzn.to/2XuaOd3 (Amazon)
Camera Bag
Tenba Solstice 10L Bag - amzn.to/3pSUosy (Amazon) bhpho.to/3ipvy4f (B&H)
Case Logic SLRC-206 - amzn.to/2CUNX0O (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gJrz2d (B&H)
KZbin Gear & Essentials
Voice Over Mic - amzn.to/3ilje4Y (Amazon)
Rode Wireless Go 2 - amzn.to/3XXMwHo (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OS9xXP (B&H)
Shotgun Mic - amzn.to/37wADx0 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3gQdgsG (B&H)
Godox SL60W - amzn.to/2tFGrp8 (Amazon) bhpho.to/3VLCSWo (B&H)
RGB LED Lights - amzn.to/3ljSxu8
Wireless Video Kit - amzn.to/3VkxZ6F (Amazon) bhpho.to/3OVTubJ (B&H)
Software
Adobe Cloud (Photoshop, Lightroom..) - prf.hn/l/8xEdXB0
Luminar AI - skylum.evyy.ne...
Tube Buddy - (Free!) - www.tubebuddy....

[@StefanMalloch]

Is this your go to 70-200??

[@efstratiosbobotsis6050]

Bought one used for a good price to replace the 55-210 kit lens late last year. Very happy with the image quality

[@danielgmur6486]

At this point i will wait to see what tamron (70-180 f2.8?) comes up with.

[@patrikcerny4922]

Daniel Gmür do u know when ?

[@danielgmur6486]

@@patrikcerny4922 should come out this month

[@tommytsunami5773]

It is for me I like it. I’m using it on a Sony a7III what are you using it on in the video?

[@jnd2415]

Why does everyone always ask “ does it stack up to today’s standard?” You don’t need the latest and greatest equipment to take awesome pictures. That’s the problem today because people think they need the latest and greatest tech. That’s why everyone’s in debt.

[@StefanMalloch]

Most cars from 1999 still work just fine too.

[@emmeXXtreme]

A great photographer once said "better to have good shoes than a good camera"

[@pawelmod3292]

I think that people mean "does it stack up to today's bodies". I can understand these question. If you are buying Sony A1 you do not want be limited by lens in term of resolution, focus speed or number frames per second it support. To be honest I wonder if you could handle with sel70200G 30 fps ...

[@fredriksvard2603]

Because the algorithm favors clickbait and "in 2022" etc titles, fuelling the upgrade hysteria that will bring about the impending climate disaster

[@fredriksvard2603]

@@pawelmod3292 nah, it's about views and the algorithm

[@SoloAngling]

Just bought one for $800 in great condition with all original accessories and even the box it came in. If you keep an eye out online you can find really good deals.

[@StefanMalloch]

Lucky guy!

[@jordanp5796]

Where did you get it? Ebay, Adorama? Let me know!

[@ElReySupr3me]

Wtf let us know where u got it haha!

[@SoloAngling]

@@ElReySupr3me got it off craigslist while on vacation in Hawaii lol.

[@SoloAngling]

@@jordanp5796 i actually got it off Craigslist while in vacation in Hawaii.

[@moisesvazquez4358]

Picked one up for 900 online. It's a great lens and sharp for portraits. Just keep looking online and you can find great deals

[@TVe200]

90% of my pictures are landscape. Landscape photografers said that everybody need a 70-200 for landscape. I have not bought one yet. Rumors said that Tamron will announce a 70-180 for Sony soon. That will be perfect for my a6500, smaller and lighter.

[@nicholassmith7723]

I'm holding out for the Tamron also

[@IntziGG]

tamron won't start at 70 for sure bruh...you don't know tamron Respects it's customers so it will give a lens that starts where the mid range left which is 75 (so it goes from the 17 to 28 from 28 to 75 and now we need a 75 to whatever :D )

[@nicholassmith7723]

@@IntziGG I don't know if it's really a respect for customers as much as an understanding of what most people need and breaking the mold of the standard dslr trio. Remember, Sony owns a good chunk of shares in Tamron and has a shared interest. I agree though it will probably be something like a 75-180mm.

[@IntziGG]

​@@nicholassmith7723 👍

[@BLEEJazz]

70 180 just released

[@richard5005]

I like your real-world review. Good job and I really like your honest review. Better than most reviews out there.

[@BenSussmanpro]

I love this review- concise, comprehensive without frivolity. I’m leaning on getting this lens vs the 2.8

[@sadenb]

I am planning to buy the lens. The lens looks very nice and has a very good rendering quality even though it is not as sharp as the f/2.8. I feel this lens is a keeper.

[@StefanMalloch]

Ya its no f2.8 but it wont let you down! Solid choice. Be aware the Tamron 70-180mm is on its way.

[@Life_Weekend]

Yes, you should. Its compact size and lightweight is essential for hiking. Reduce F to lower than 5.6 and add a CPL.

[@shawvercreations9703]

I own this lens and love it! I use it for photo and video at weddings and events. I have used the Gmaster version and I love the results however the price and weight of the Gmaster lens is much more than this G lens.

[@belezasdanatureza1539]

Olá, vc sabe me dizer se ela e boa para filmagem e fotografia de pássaros na natureza?

[@YourStoryStudios]

Love that it zooms internally!

[@markdbey]

Hey man! I really respect your grind! Keep up the great work!!

[@StefanMalloch]

Thanks dude, I will!

[@acme9538]

I switched from Canon 7d mark ii with Canon 70-200 f2.8 L is ii . . . and went with Sony a7iii and Sony 70-200 F4 G OSS . . . can't even compare the 2 . . . . so glad I made the switch !!!! Thanks for the review !

[@thethirdman225]

Pretty much mirrors what I'm doing. I haven't got the Sony 70-200 f:4 yet but it's coming.

[@medd1990]

I just bought one in 2022. Great lens (and meanwhile a bit cheaper).

[@schoeferfilm]

Top video Stefan 👏 I am looking for a good tele lens for filming with my FX6 and I think the 70-200 mm f4 would be a perfect deal 😅 the FX6 ha no Ibis, do you think the Image stabilization of the lens is good enough? best cinematic greetings from a small german KZbin filmmaker

[@gamerguy655]

Great video! Love this lens. First sony lens I ever bought

[@isaaconeal2650]

me too, im still trying to figure it out

[@tomasvugman2239]

Hi! Great review Stefan! Thanks a lot, i am wondering if this lens will be fine and sharp also in my sony a6600 aps-c, because lot of people don't recomend FF glass on aps-c bodies, saying that is a lot of waste in sharpness, what do you think about this? Thanks and cheers from Argentina!

[@StefanMalloch]

It will have a 1.5x crop but if you plan to upgrade in the future to ff, should be ok. If not, consider the awesome 70-350

[@jeramemedina4088]

I have the a6400 would you prefer this one over the 70-350 for shooting dogs ?

[@paulomateus3083]

Thanks for the review! Thanks! Do you know if with the A7SIII you can use the OSS on the lens and ibis on the camera at the same time?

[@pawelmod3292]

I have got quite long decision process in 2021 about sel70200G F4 vs sel70200GM F2.8 and Tarmon 70-180 2.8 After all I have decided to buy 70-200 G F4 because: - 70-200 GM 2.8 is "old" and an expensive lens - I have some trust issues with 3rd party lenses (tamron) The trigger for my decision was the price on the Amazon NL: only 889 Euro. The old suggested price was 1699 Euro, regular price was 1099 Euro, so 889 was for me a very good price - more than 300 euro cheaper then tamron 70-180 and almost 1/3 of the GM. I'm considering 70-200G as a bridge lens - I'm waiting for the new GM 70-200 2.8 MKII

[@arta179]

Stefan Hi, Thank you very much for the positive review. The lens now costs around €900, and I have a Sony A7. Would it be a sensible investment to buy this lens for my camera which is not so up to date? I particularly enjoy photographing children at play and airplane spotting near airports. I would greatly appreciate your guidance.

[@SoapFilmz]

Im looking to shoot mountain biking with really fast moving subjects and am wondering if the auto focus will be able to get the shot, any advice would be appreciated

[@viraks7942]

nice video, does it come with autofocus? or just manual? thanks

[@StefanMalloch]

Yes its an AF lens

[@MannyG32968]

Can't WAIT to get mine here soon!!

[@jarrod7465]

Pro tip. Take off the tripod mount and you can save even more weight.

[@keithpinn152]

Hi Stefan: Thanks for your review of this lens. I have purchased this lens and I am completely happy with it. Do you know if a teleconverter lens is available for this lens. If so, which one is it? Thanks, Keith

[@StefanMalloch]

No TC available for the f4 unfortunately

[@keithpinn152]

Thanks Stefan for your response. Too bad!

[@StefanMalloch]

@@keithpinn152 Still a great and capable lens! Don't discount crop mode when needed.

[@iriswebber4925]

My lense just arrived and thanks for the intro and setting hints.!

[@PhotoTrekr]

The 70-200mm f4 G is my 70-200 now. The GM, which I owned, is a little better, but I mainly shoot landscapes and don't really need the faster aperture and don't want to carry the extra weight. For portraiture I would go with the GM, though.

[@StefanMalloch]

Makes sense.

[@IBOTeCH]

I have a sony a7c camera, which lens is better for my camera 1. Sony FE 70-200mm F4,G OSS, Full Format or 2. Sony SEL 24-105mm f/4,0 G OSS I hope for your advice

[@VLS28]

For an amateur photographer perhaps this lens is ok, but i think that is not a choise for a professional one. Especially if at almost same money can buy A tamron 70-180, 2.8. The quality and the sharpeness between them is HUGE!!

[@vavdashev]

Excellent overview! Special thanks for the comparison with crop!👍

[@StefanMalloch]

Happy to help!

[@GilesEvans1]

With the new Tamron 70-180, f2.8 is this lens even relevant anymore?

[@StefanMalloch]

Still a great option and you'll probably find it a bit cheaper now. Better build, more reach and image stabilization nut not as fast.

[@user-dh5fp4gw1b]

@@StefanMalloch is 1000 to much for this lens? In euros btw!

[@annerivera2594]

Hey man, great review! My wife is a beginning photographer and is looking for a good telephoto lens that can be used for both landscape and animal portraiture, as well as events and portraits. In short, she is looking or a lens that does good does it all and doesn't want to spend $2,000+. Is this a good lens for what she is looking for?

[@StefanMalloch]

It fits the bill! Check out the Tamron 70-180mm f2.8 as well for comparison.

[@jessieN1223]

Great review! Thanks for sharing.

[@lycans6045]

I have a Tamron 28-200mm f2.8.. would you say the Sony F4 would be pointless to get?

[@tonyward5665]

Hello would this 70 -200 lens fit the Sony a6000

[@StefanMalloch]

Yes. Because it's a crop camera, you would then get a (1.5x) focal length. (105-300mm)

[@briancook9395]

Yes it does. I have it with my a6000. I can’t get sharp pics no matter what I do. Not sure if the lens or the camera.

[@marlowhadnot]

@@briancook9395 frightening ... Did you fix that ?

[@ericthestone]

Tamron soon annouced 70-180 f/2.8 will be a good contender vs this lens!

[@bioliv1]

Will the Tamron have internal focus?

[@balboa0621]

@@bioliv1 No. It doesn't.

[@denyxrunner]

Yeah but I want to know the price of the tamron because if it’s to high I just buy the sony right now

[@jamesjackson4264]

Light Yagami probably between $1300-$1500.

[@denyxrunner]

james jackson that’s way too high because tamron price don’t drop... That would be 1500€ here in EU and for 1700€ I can get the gm or for 900€ this f4 sony. I hope this tamron will be around 1000€ here

[@katherinebailey4004]

Stefan - does this lens work with the Sony TCs? Is the image quality just terrible with them? Thanks

[@StefanMalloch]

Unfortunately I believe its only going to work for the 70-200 GM I & II.

[@StefanMalloch]

Stick to the 1.4x in my experience.

[@rodneywatkins4731]

Is this lens also due for an update from Sony, or is that just the GM version?

[@agungrizqinianto9016]

got this lens last month. and i just realize thers some dust in between the front element and the zoom optic, despite marketed as Dustproof&Moisture proof. is it normal, or should i return it to sony for inspection?? should i worry? the dust doesnt affect the images taken tho.

[@rickymcc9072]

It's a neat lens for sure. Would you still go for it in a world where the Tamron 70-180 f2.8 also lives?

[@StefanMalloch]

There are pros and cons to both. Hard to say but value goes to the Tam.

[@rickymcc9072]

@@StefanMalloch Agree. I always wanted f2.8 but without the GM heft. Saw multiple great Tam reviews, so bought one. Compared both then sold my Sony f4 G. Now suffering with post cognitive dissonance and agonise if I really made correct decision! Emotionally I might feel better had I never heard about the Tammie option. Love the better size of T, if not the build quality and at f2.8 it beats Sony at short focal lengths on sharpness across frame. It's more nuanced at longer lengths, but Sony is arguably the stronger performer and benefits hugely from OSS (which I now really miss). Although T is quicker and sharper at shorter focal lengths, I find I'm using a lens like this more at longer lengths. It's easy to carry/use a small prime like 55 or 85mm f1.8 when you want more speed, in lower light, for better edge sharpness, less heft etc. Not so easy towards 200mm, where OSS also benefits the 'real world' use case. Pixel peeping corners at 100% mag in Lightroom, for real world use, isn't that helpful or relevant. I had never felt I was somehow missing out on resolution with my old, now sold, Sony G. In conclusion I'm left feeling that these lenses are probably pretty equal overall on a broad balance of factors, but exhibit different relative strengths. So it's "six of one, half a dozen of the other". A tricky call - which one is best really depends on each individuals relative needs and intended uses. Much to like in my new Tammie, just not so much to love. Whereas in retrospect I think I did love my now gone Sony G. Ohhh the dilemma!

[@kriterer]

@@rickymcc9072 thank you for solving my dilemma between which to find. I hope you eventually find some kind of true love for the Tamron though :)

[@grantdawson5408]

Hello. Is it worth getting the sony over the tamron because of the OSS as that tamron lens doesn't have it.

[@standhd]

Great review, as always!

[@charruaporelmundo]

I have this lens on my cart, but I'm hoping sigma will announce theirs. For the moment the tamron 28-200 is doing it. Of course this lens us superbly constructed, can't compare with the tamron, but to be sincerely I wish some youtuber could have done a Vs of this Sony with the tamron 28-200 since this last one is very impressive.

[@marco.martinez]

after seen this video I ordered mine, thank you,

[@Thexderify]

So, did you sell your f4 for the f2.8 or did you keep both?

[@StefanMalloch]

I dont have either and ended up with the 100-400.

[@diamonddogs6037]

Thought about buying one but heard alot of bad things about it, they said it was cheaply made. Breaks very easy.

[@adama-k2710]

Don't drop it then

[@bono4life]

Thanks for the video, definitely helped out.

[@StefanMalloch]

Happy to help!

[@vlottje]

I want to get this lense for indoor sports. Mainly volleyball. I shoot on an A7sII. Will this lense perform well enough?

[@StefanMalloch]

Depends on the level you're going for and what your budget is. F4 may struggle indoors and you'll have to bump up your iso. Keep an eye out for the newly announced tamron 70-180mm f2.8.

[@vlottje]

Thank you I will!

[@jamesbailey7248]

This is a great lens that captures sharp pictures. However, I would not buy this lens again as there is no teleconverters option compared to the other 2.8 70-200 mm version. It seems that they did this on purpose so that others would buy the costlier 2.8 option. Seriously look at other lenses as 200 mm is only a moderate zoom capability without options to easily increase your range. Due to this limiting factor, this lens will probably sit in your bag more than it should. You should find other solutions with increased range and/or the ability add teleconverters or you will be forced to buy and carry additional lenses/weight.

[@StefanMalloch]

I'm rocking the 100-400 personally

[@HilleCine]

This is the only reason I won't buy this lens thanks.

[@thethirdman225]

I used to own a Canon 70-200 f:2.8 and never, ever used it with a TC. The weight and price advantages of this lens more than justify it, IMHO.

[@ZadieBear]

I picked it up used for less than $800 back in April. For that price, it is a must buy. If I had been looking at buying this at full price, I might have saved my pennies and tried to purchase its big brother used.

[@richinlukang7042]

Why would you use Super-35 when you can crop in post? Does it make a difference in the end?

[@timschulz3714]

I'm not an expert on the subject, but my understanding is that using Super-35 and cropping in post will yield the same image quality (Super-35 is essentially cropping in-camera as I understand it). The reason you would use Super-35 is to help with composition. If you already know you want the extra reach then you can use Super-35 to make sure you have the composition right, whereas if you shoot full-frame and then crop afterwords it will give you more freedom with the crop, but the interesting part of the image might not be composed as well (leading lines, framing, ect.).

[@richinlukang7042]

@@timschulz3714 When a 24MP full frame sensor is put into crop mode, the resulting image size is 10.7MP. Wouldn't it be better to take a full 24MP image and crop in post while still having those extra 13MP to work with? Even after cropping the image, a file over 10.7MP could still be rendered. Or, wouldn't it be better to just put the full frame lens on a crop sensor camera to get the cropped sensor zoom effect while still achieving 24MP image quality?

[@IntziGG]

Sory but won't it be the same as using a full frame camera on a APS-C mode to get that 1.6X more ? or it's not the same as using a crop sensor camera?

[@StefanMalloch]

Sony crop is 1.5x. Same thing.

[@IntziGG]

@@StefanMalloch ok thank you :D

[@belezasdanatureza1539]

Olá ! Vc sabe me dizer se ela e boa para filmagem e fotografia de pássaros e animais silvestres na natureza?

[@funwalk5304]

I'm trying to get this lens... Please is there any cheap option for this lens?

[@StefanMalloch]

A cheaper lens?

[@BrewReview]

Used? A similar focal length from a 3rd party manufacturer?

[@fourkings_]

Should i get this one or the 90mm macro for studio fashion work?

[@StefanMalloch]

Macro but I hope you have lots of room!

[@grumpygroman]

*Excellent review... NO BS*

[@unknownmember99]

How well will it work on sony A6400?

[@BrianHallmond]

This review was great! You got a subscriber out of me.

[@StefanMalloch]

Appreciate that friend

[@mikec.8556]

Sony says that this lens is for asp- c specifically and does not recommend for A7 and higher cameras being A7 and up are full frame cameras

[@StefanMalloch]

This is a full frame lens my friend.

[@mikec.8556]

@@StefanMalloch I’m just repeating what Sony says under the specs for this Lens

[@user-dh5fp4gw1b]

@@mikec.8556 can i get a link of that? That would be pretty weird its a ff lens

[@leonc100]

The Tamron is a nice lens... but will not auto focus nearly as fast as the Sony F4 or the Sony GM 2.8. Not even close. I'd rather have the sony F4 than the Tamron 2.8

[@nathanvrvrt]

Is it good deal if i can get it for 750 euros now that the tamron 75-180 is out ?

[@pawelmod3292]

new one or second hand?

[@adrinathegreat3095]

Is it still worth buying.... is Glass any better now than it was 5 years ago, most pros use manual focus, and I.s isn't really an issue on full frame not at this focal length. As for landscapes I cant see why auto focus speed or I.s would be of any use at all. Now on a crop sensor camera, 1.5x 70-200 then i.s is needed for faster moving subjects, unless you are using a tripod.

[@BrianHallmond]

Would it mount a Sony a6400?

[@StefanMalloch]

Indeed. It would be a 105-300mm though

[@BrianHallmond]

@@StefanMalloch Because of the crop factor hey. I think that's good lol.

[@davidwallace8980]

It is the best chose, if cost or size makes the FE 70-200/2.8 undesirable.

[@virusj216]

the sigma version will come out soon

[@Avat6]

@@virusj216 when ? Sigma is not dropping any hints..lol

[@GBO76]

Now that Tamron has announced their 70-180 f2.8, and that everyone is also waiting for the Sigma's 70-200 f2.8, the answer to the question "should you still buy the 70-200 F4 in 2020", is now obvious : NO, NO and NO. It's a solid lens, and it's nice in white, but we all know that Tamron and Sigma's will offer good alternatives for less money, at f2.8. With no surprice, you can see more and more 70-200 F4 on the second hand market (in Europ for sure). If you've got one and are interesting by the Tamron or Sigma's, don't wait 6 months to sell it, otherwise it'll be too late. Prices will drop, just as they are with the 24-70 GM (due to the Sigma's 24-70).

[@maulolkajan8565]

Tamron 70-180 or this?

[@ezbozovago]

Informative review thank you

[@jashandadyal6953]

R u still happy with that , shall i buy new one?

[@StefanMalloch]

In this day and age, I might check out the Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 for the money. Still a great lens though

[@robinvangerwen9062]

what about now.. Should i still buy it in 2022?

[@kolapyellow7631]

Where does it make?

[@DiviPhotos]

Cool video nice job

[@OptimaMrL]

It's not a sun shade, it's a lens hood. Sun shade implies it is to be used when using when the sun's out.

[@StefanMalloch]

That's the idea. 😂

[@peterjunbalcita7543]

Noted this lens.. Love your eyes..😁✌️

[@HenryZivers]

wait for tamron 70-180 F2.8

[@BrewReview]

张河 the tamron will be at least 900, probably closer to 11-1200. It might be a wash unless you REALLY need that aperture.

[@denyxrunner]

Will the tamron have stabilization? From the rumor I understand it will not... this is a big no sense for such a focal length! Hope I understand wrongly

[@sallymas625]

Light Yagami Sony has built in stabilization so it’s really a non factor

[@denyxrunner]

Sal Mascellino I have the a7III so I know but if you own one of the last sony you will know that it work the best on wide angle and just ok on 50-70mm... focal range like 100mm it help like only 1/2 stop compared to 4/5 of a dedicated lens stabilization. Tamron also made on of the best stabilization on the market... at least I hope the price will be under 1000€

[@sallymas625]

Light Yagami I have an a9 currently and have no issues with lens without stabilization, although yes the results are “better” if the lens has it as well. Tamron is definitely gonna be in the 1k-1.5k range considering the Sony is $2500. Still a great value but I don’t see this being the same $8-900 as the 28-75 2.8.

[@comebacktobal]

Sony 70-200 F4 or sony 70-300 F4.5-5.6?

[@thefailingstudent]

this is my current dilemma for soccer in the day time. my canon 70-300 adapted did well but i felt the camera struggled with it.

[@wisanggenisuryoanggono6140]

@@thefailingstudent me too, just wait for 70-180 from tamron first 😭

[@AntPDC]

"What's goin' on guys?". Nobody else uses that intro...

[@StefanMalloch]

Oh man, thanks so much for your contribution to the community!

[@AntPDC]

@@StefanMalloch Why thank you! Best wishes.

[@alexcameron5254]

Your noise floor is cutting in and out and is distracting from your video. Maybe get a better mic or copy/paste noise floor Wild in between your lines

[@miki0507]

Nice teste 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@Bushcraft242]

2.8 sold my f4 for $400

[@yathirajpoojary7581]

Woahh

[@kimkimchannel8951]

"👍👍👍👍

[@intort3291]

Sure not Tamron 70-180 much more better than that.

[@StefanMalloch]

We will wait and see.

[@princessjfpv]

Lol it looks like you are wearing purple lip stick

[@StefanMalloch]

Maybe I was.

[@nafizhaq4554]

No

[@GilbertTV]

sell it & get the 75 to 180 tamron... haha

[@atiba13x57]

niye bu kadar çok konuşuyosunuz olum yaa ne seviyosunuz konuşmayı bu kadar her eğitim videosu aynı

[@DeepikaAditya]

it’s 2022

[@brentschmogbert]

No it’s. Not. Stops lying on the internet

[@kolapyellow7631]

Heavy.

[@virusj216]

don't buy it. wait for the tamron and sigma tele zooms

[@nicksnyder1024]

I disliked this video because no photographer should want the zoom ring farther away from them when shooting.

[@StefanMalloch]

Thanks man. Makes sense

[@Fennecbutt]

Of course it's still worth buying, even in 2021...there's no other fe mount lens that is equivalent

[@StefanMalloch]

With the Tamron 70-180 f2.8 now.. this is a hard sell.