Sony’s Year of Embarrassment Part 1: Madame Web

[@philiphunt315]

Your videos are so high quality. Your channel deserves more attention.

[@StuartLugsden]

They reused Spiderman 2 footage They reused Insomniac Spidermans theme The suits get less than a minute of screen time We first saw the Madam Web suit on a drinking bottle because the marketing was awful and its just her handing her hand out and nobody can understand why Sony needs to give up and hand creative control back to Feige. Just focus on Spiderverse and Insomniac. Everyone would be grateful.

[@AdamDoyle21]

Well to be fair the Insomniac games have gotten pretty terrible with the influence of Sweet Baby Inc and the absolute character assassination of beloved characters. But I do agree the Spider-Verse movies are pretty great and the Morbverse movies are pretty bad.

[@arnesahlen2704]

*Brilliant* visual puns at "They were...

[@AFILMBYNICORIVERA]

absolutely love your channel. great video!!

[@StuartLugsden]

Avi Arad isn’t involved and yet it still feels like one of his movies. Also this movie isn’t even part of the Sony Universe. So whats the point? Oh yeah, to make money and to prevent the rights reverting back to Marvel.

[@HorseJoint]

“MaDamn Poop”.

[@LordSwoladin]

The amazing Spider-Man line is closer to the line used in the comics than the 2002 movie

[@Excelsior_15]

There's no way to make a cinematic universe out of the Spider-Man property. Because all they really have is his rogue's gallery. They are actually doing the only thing they can possibly do, which is try to make those historically evil serial killing murderers into anti-heroes. There's another property that is erasing all good and evil, heroes and villains, namely Disney's Star wars. And what we've learned from them is that S@#T is BORING AF!!!

[@Excelsior_15]

The actual original line is the one that May said in no way home.

[@masondarden2423]

The crazy thing is I don’t even think the movie was that bad. It wasn’t good but it wasn’t the worse superhero movie I seen

[@Excelsior_15]

I noticed during red letter media's review of Jack and Jill that they put a lot of actual products on the screen. I noticed that you do it here as well. Is it not illegal to do or is it just that these brands are so thirsty for any kind of marketing they don't bother you about it?