Sony vs Nikon: This Changes Everything

[@cameraconspiracies]

If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, Bigfoot will guide you through your next hike. Just some show notes. Voigtlander 58mm f1.4 had 2 fingerprints on front element, that's why it looked like a black pro mist lol. Sony autofocus was set to max speed and responsiveness for some reason, and went haywire on the Zeiss 55mm f1.8 outside. Nikon official LUT sucks for n-log, makes red orange. You can donate Bitcoin if you'd like :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f Nikon ZF amzn.to/4ebuZnb Nikkor 17-28mm f2.8 amzn.to/4bUoeEI Nikkor 28mm f2.8 SE amzn.to/45rspW3 Nikkor 40mm f2 amzn.to/3XhcW8U Voigtlander 58mm f1.4 SL II amzn.to/3VzKJsP Nikkor Z 85mm f1.2 S amzn.to/45fXFr7 Sony A7S III amzn.to/45rsUPV Zeiss Batis 18mm f2.8 amzn.to/4ek22Fo Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 amzn.to/4bV8ZeL Voigtlander 35mm f1.2 bhpho.to/3Pw5pOi Zeiss 55mm f1.8 amzn.to/3VB8QXV Sony 90mm f2.8 macro amzn.to/3XdW7fd Tascam DR-10L amzn.to/4ebs7qt Sennheiser MKH 416 amzn.to/4bUsTGG All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice

[@eugeneBai]

Ok, guys, Nikon color science = "I came from sauna" , Sony color science= "Call to hospital , I have a jaundice"... What to do?... What to do?...

[@DarkTrapStudio]

His face is red, look at his skin elsewhere It's proper skin tones.

[@notisbenos]

Panasonic.

[@unbroken1010]

Ask p Diddy, he knows best

[@unbroken1010]

​@@DarkTrapStudiowhat's proper?

[@zaiENT1]

He should just stop using log because he sucks at it like me

[@rubenwojcikiewicz2281]

Nikon DR on that lamp in the back is remarkable

[@amermeleitor]

For the best colors in Nikon you need to play with the "Flat" profile. A bit less contrast, a lot less sharpening, a bit more saturation. And you can adapt sony Zeiss lenses on Nikon. PERFECT!!

[@brugj03]

And then you buy a Sony and won`t have to do all those things and can use Zeiss glass as a bonus.

[@amermeleitor]

@@brugj03 with Nikon you can use Zeiss glass too. With Sony you need to play with menus to achieve the best image too

[@northofbrandon]

agreed flat is king

[@unbroken1010]

That adapter seems sketchy ñ a sagger lover p Diddy/ Snoop Dogg after party

[@northofbrandon]

@@unbroken1010 are you alright

[@MrCranebay]

Sony has better colors in skin tones but I preferred the blue and green tones of Nikon. Though I would go for Sony as skin tones are harder to grade in general than to just slightly adjust green and blue tones of the surroundings to your liking. And checking the previous videos the Sony IBIS is good and Nikon seems to be useless wobble. I would say neither has as good stabe as Panasonic (Sony is almost as good it seems).

[@chrisogrady28]

Watching close to a 4K monitor, Nikon is much sharper and the dynamic range looks at least a stop better. Managing that while using the best Sony video body vs a random Nikon one, and a Zeiss prime vs a zoom, the Nikon is doing way better than it has any right for

[@ElBoyoElectronico]

Even as a Canon shooter myself, I have always preferred your Sony A7SIII over every other camera that you have ever used.

[@jojos-yt-adventures]

Nikon color science is like: " I forgot the sunscreen protection " or " im shy don't point the camera at me"

[@norfolknonsense7578]

Exactly what I was thinking. Maybe it was the sunburn LUT 😉

[@NVIK5]

As a former Nikon and current Sony user I find Sony to be more colour accurate. Nikon is wonderful, but saturation and contrast are raised quite a bit. I hope colour temperature was set identically here.

[@ducnguyen1999]

I found they all need to be corrected 😅

[@unbroken1010]

​@@ducnguyen1999 relax P Diddy

[@Quidisi]

I'm a Nikon Zf guy, but damn, Nikon just got it's butt kicked!

[@sunlit777]

nothing beats Sony A7s3 for video, in that price range.

[@jayacustico9518]

I think 🤔 you see a different video…

[@unbroken1010]

It got it kicked and licked by p Diddy and Drake

[@Quidisi]

@@unbroken1010 You add nothing to the discussion. Go away.

[@jimpack9622]

lol no it didn’t, the Sony looked like crap, get your eyes checked

[@audioupgrades]

It was easy to spot the difference. The Nikon always has redder skintones. You can also see the effects of the T* coatings on the Zeiss lenses because they have better microcontrast and more pronounced highlights.

[@Sebastian-lw1ei]

I agree on colors but find Nikon more in focus with more 3D pop @1:22 side by side

[@audioupgrades]

​@@chiftele08You do know that the Nikon has a Sony sensor?

[@audioupgrades]

​@@Sebastian-lw1eiAre you using a calibrated screen?

[@Sebastian-lw1ei]

@@audioupgrades yes, iPad Pro

[@DarkTrapStudio]

@@Sebastian-lw1ei Last one ? :O

[@mjklein]

I couldn't stop looking at the shadow on your right temple.

[@unbroken1010]

Virgin gamer?

[@OlavAlexanderMjelde]

I think the Sony looked better inside and outside. On inside I feel the Nikon added too much red, outside its got too little red and shadows seems to be worse on the nikon (looks washed out).

[@aldrob108]

The Nikon gives reddish skin tones, face looks a little sunburnt and the shirt looks orange. Sony looks natural and the colors look accurate. I don’t own gear by either manufacturer so I have no bias. If I were in the market, it would be an easy decision going with the Sony. Love your videos. Always very informative and entertaining. Great job!

[@Mr09260]

I love my Sony TV >> but Nothing compares with camera of the Year Nikon Z8

[@robertarmero6320]

The reason this is the case is because he is a more warm/magenta environment so it appears Sony does well there while Nikon appears to do better with skin tones outside

[@unbroken1010]

So who do you sack top for ? P Diddy or Drake?

[@aldrob108]

@@unbroken1010 All I know is that I don’t end a sentence in a preposition.😎

[@vaniaadit]

Zeiss batis line up is 🔥🔥🔥

[@classic.cameras]

Sony is the best camera to adapt lenses. Especially vintage. I have 100 of them and like a dozen cheap adapters from China.

[@steveh8658]

Not sure what I like more; your frustration of the rendition, or the rendition of your frustration! Lol! 18:00 Toneh!

[@QuicknStraight]

I have consistently said that I don't know why people moan about Sony colour science. It's nowhere near as bad as people claim. The Sony colour looks better here than the Nikon Zf.

[@greysuit17]

In a blind test people picked Sony over all the other brands. It’s hilarious.

[@James_118]

@15:43 Nikon renders sky in nice blue tone, Sony looks weird .

[@QuicknStraight]

@@James_118 No colour system is perfect, but overall Sony is better than Nikon, especially the skin tones, in Standard colour.

[@jftron]

Nikon looks too warm, but with the Sony there is a green shade on the face.

[@greysuit17]

@@jftron isolated there is no issue

[@tech-utuber2219]

LoL'd @ 1:50 impromptu Panny S9 commercial 🤣

[@bailey.nt86]

The nikon 28mm f/2 ai-s lens is pretty fun. It's definitely not as popular as the f/2.8 . It has slightly more CA, the bokeh is slightly busier, But the 3D pop on that thing is pretty nice. Its a pretty unique lens & It's easy to shoot with too. They also made a 24mm f/2 ai-s i haven't used yet. However, I suspect they will look similar.

[@SimeonKolev]

Just buy the Techart AF adapter for the Nikon and you will have video AF with the Voightlanders, with Megadap adapter you can have AF on the ZF with Sony E mount lenses...

[@felm.974]

Indeed, they make Nikon look bad when it comes to AF for no reason, learn learn learn to use your gear, then talk about things after you learn to use them well and correctly... but maybe he didn't know, but now he knows lol

[@SMGJohn]

@@felm.974 You need to learn English grammar. But regardless, Sony autofocus is class leading for a reason, it just works. Having to baby the autofocus on the Nikon makes it worse, period. Even Panasonic performs better in this regard with its PDAF.

[@unbroken1010]

Never heard of e Mount to Nikon .since when? The review I just read said it's ok. It has issues on certain cameras and no ibis

[@unbroken1010]

​@@SMGJohnwe need to just close the border. This experiment is over

[@felm.974]

@@SMGJohn You are the one who needs to learn English grammar, you Sony fan boy los3r. Nobody cares about your perfect AF or that of Panasonic, this video is about Nikon, not Sony.

[@TimSeraphiel]

Will you be swapping your Zf to a Z6iii?

[@Sebastian-lw1ei]

He already preordered it, its coming on Monday 😂

[@bluecomposite]

Please use Rich Tone Portrait Picture Control on Nikon ZF.

[@TechnikMeister2]

The problem for photographers is that todays lenses are linked to the Cameras CPU like they never were before. Optical performance must have both pieces of the puzzle. Its not so much now whether a lens mount is compatible, but I would not be buying 3rd party lenses anymore. There is no way that Nikon, Sony or Canon would allow them to be as good as their native lenses. In effect, cameras and lenses are becoming more proprietary than ever before and its easy for camera manufacturers to do this in software. Then there is the interesting test that was done in the UK where one of their portrait photographers discovered something about Nikons latest NEF raw files. When opened in Lightroom with no edits at all, the image was inferior to the same file opened directly in Capture One. The NEF file had more code in its metadata in C1. When queried about it, someone in C1 admitted that they license the full NEF file algotithm from Nikon, but Adobe does not. Interesting. So a new workflow emerges if you are a LR user. Open the NEF in Nikon Studio v1.6.1, save it as a TIFF then open that in LR. There is a difference even to the naked eye. As for video? Nikon didn't buy Red for the product, but to steer vloggers to a non hybrid platform.

[@stanleyng9491]

Not sure if I am correct; Nikon boosts the "brightness" of red (not "saturation"). You can compare the face as well as the tee-shirt.

[@flightographist]

luminance

[@stanleyng9491]

@@flightographist oh yes. This is the proper word.

[@classic.cameras]

Lens that blows me away for landscape is the Sony Zeiss 16-35mm f4 OS. Paid nearly nothing for a ugly version of this lens and am blown away. Even has some 3D pop.

[@TheLinesEnd]

I can’t get over how much better the Sony looks. The Nikon colors just look super bad. It’s waaaaaaaaaay too red. The Sony on the other hand looks fanfuckingtastic

[@Greggie_D]

That Nikon “I’m embarrassed” filter. 😂

[@unique93obr]

Standard profile is not the best for Nikon...I think new Rich Tone Portrait is the best, if you don't want to use Raw or Log... :) It gives much better colors. :)

[@cameraconspiracies]

Almost identical...

[@SimeonKolev]

18:45 why the 85 1.2 is more like a 105-120mm in this comparison :)?

[@steveh8658]

The difference is probably the video crop.

[@AI3Dorinte]

I got myself a mint condition planar 50mm f1.4 and I don't want to take it off my camera :)

[@gregmonforton4103]

Sony loves jaundice yellow and hates sky blue. Nikon sure loves green.

[@tubularificationed]

Nikon's skin tones are quite consistently wrong in terms of being too red, as evident throughout the video. But for landscapes, yes may be Nikon tends to oversaturate greens, at the collateral damage of making green too uniform, i.e. too little room left over for variation between various subtle green hues.

[@kazeshiii]

The Nikon red face made it quite obvious the right side was still Nikon. 3:55 At 4:32 N-Log looks better than before because it reduced the amount of reddish face. S-Log seems to have added a bit of yellow to your skin tones.

[@chcomes]

in case you one day get a panasonic, try the "nicest 709", that is a look you will love. BTW, the standard is much better in the sony than the nikon, that redness... But then again, the shirt in Sony was not the right color.

[@cameraconspiracies]

It was in the G9 II and it sucked.

[@NoliPugay]

unfortunately, both are inconvenient for travelers. All mirrorless camera nowadays are good enough for content creators even phones. I found myself using my phone most of the time when travel vlogging and only carry and use my cameras when producing high res photos only after scouting the place.

[@fml5290]

Wonder how the 58mm f/1.4 would be on the zf w/ adapter

[@cameraconspiracies]

I showed it in this video...

[@fml5290]

The Nikon 58mm f/1.4G

[@poikatiikeri]

hey have you tried megadap ETZ21 Pro autofocus adapter and sony glass on nikon? I just ordered the Z8 and the adapter, hopefully it will give me time to get nikon glass

[@cameraconspiracies]

I have it, but it doesn't work lol. I don't have the proprietary usb clip to update the firmware.

[@random_dev]

@@cameraconspiracies That's not the Pro man....On the Pro the firmware is updated through the camera. No need to USB.

[@random_dev]

Work like a charm, at least for photo. I used it with the 200-600M Sony, great result.

[@maloghurst2741]

I knew the song right away. Slight greenish hue. Didn’t look bad but I wish a bit more natural.

[@russhermanson9369]

Angry photog is not always right. I have the Nikon 28mm 1.4E and it is beyond amazing. I pair it with my 50mm 1.2s and it is a great combo for anything ‘normal’ fov.

[@flugga182]

I prefer nikon usually but if you are really expecting for the z6iii to be a game changer or something that will blow your mind you are probably gonna be disappointed. It will be a ZF in a modern body with no flippy screen and a handfull of better photo specs :D . If you are not sold by now to the nikon system I doubt the z6iii will change your mind. Z6iii will be my first full frame camera most likely ;)

[@cameraconspiracies]

Z6 III has a flippy screen.

[@yawningmarmot]

Log color looks way off. Maybe try applying the official Rec 709 LUT from both companies for comparison?

[@cameraconspiracies]

I did...

[@yawningmarmot]

@@cameraconspiracies You didn't correct it, just used it out of the box? Either way, the shirt looks weird on Nikon

[@florabee9283]

On my lab standard Vizio trash-pick tv I'm using as a monitor, the sony has a pink hue over everything, and makes the red shirt look surreal and oversaturated, while the Nikon gets the colors much more believable. Return that expensive Nikon lens, it costs too much for what it does, unless you need to shoot wide open all the time. The earth is actually sort of dish shaped, the dome is flat, the earth has to be bent some to keep the water in.

[@TheArneSaknussemm]

Nikkor G 24mm f/1.4 is a great lens. So is the 58. And the 85. Also the older AIS 85mm is fantastic

[@puppet_master]

Dunno which is which yet, I like the look of the left initially

[@chuckhatcher5073]

Angry Photographer was just plain wrong about the AF-S 28/1.4E. I don’t know if he had a bad copy, or if it was at the time he was changing his focus to fringe science (not that there’s anything wrong with that). But don’t discount it because of his (non)recommendation.

[@NixonReptiles]

Sony definitely wins in this one overall color wise for all the reasons people mentioned already.

[@TheLinesEnd]

Not sure if it’s a color grade or if Nikons color science has regressed

[@PrdpPrdp-q6z]

I recognised the colours from bith cameras. i am sure i am not the only one.

[@cowboy6591]

Did Ya hear about the photographer that got busted for "Indecent Exposure?"....

[@unbroken1010]

Did you know rappers do it all the time

[@Justin.HeterodonHome]

Oh. I thought for sure the Sony was on the right, but I liked the colors better. I was going to doubt by choice in camera brands if Sony ended up with the more appealing colors. Glad I was wrong, lol.

[@killerskincanoe]

Mic so good... Too good.

[@Romafedorov]

Nikon colors look way worse here, especially in the last comparison. You looked like Dracula for a second there..

[@unbroken1010]

He looked like he came from a P Diddy/ Snoop Dogg After party

[@jlinc187]

@@unbroken1010dude you can’t just reply the same stupid joke on every comment. Make a friend, get a hobby.

[@BlackapinoTheTechGuy]

*yeah color grading is always going to be different for everyone, it's always going to boil down too what you want to spend on a lens, is there alternatives to what you're looking for but I switch from Panasonic Specifically because their Auto focus Sucked and I didn't even know what color grading or LUTS where when starting*

[@almelnik]

Sony looks like it has commercial/cinema postprocessing to it. Looks cool but Nikon is more natural and sharper, and just more chill to look at. Red is too much but if it can be handled, Nikon wins easily.

[@bobtronic73]

Nice comparison. For the standard profiles Sony looked better IMO. You butchered the colors in log profiles though :D

[@cameraconspiracies]

That's just the standard Nikon LUT, I didn't do anything to the colours.

[@bobtronic73]

@@cameraconspiracies sorry, should have been more clear. I meant the Sony colors for log. It looks a bit washed out and few weird hue shifts. Keep these tests coming!

[@earlmonroe98]

As a noob who uses the D5600 I can truly say that Nikon tends to fall on the cooler side. Cannon, Sony, and others tend to fall on the warmer side. It all comes down to taste.

[@CO8848_2]

Man, I used to be a Nikon fan and thought my Nikon photos of Angkor Wat had plenty of pop. But now I see the 3d pop of Nikon was really.in black and white only and the Zeiss just dominated the Nikon.

[@Zimmy123]

The A7SIII with the Batis 25mm looks so nice...i wanna immediately sell my kidney (s)...😀 The Zf sure looks like a great camera though.

[@m0nztam0nk]

Umm…nikon „matching Sony“? The z8 offer internal 8k60 raw that works and looks amazing, also 120p 4kraw internal with NO crop…Nikon currently is leading in this area, not Sony, or am i missing something here?

[@cameraconspiracies]

Yes, you're missing something. Nobody needs 8k, it doesn't interest me. Nikon is lacking in slow mo, nothing higher than 120fps. Even Olympus has 240fps. Z8 also has no flippy screen, limiting the shots to behind the camera only.

[@m0nztam0nk]

@@cameraconspiracies ah, that makes sense. I dont need any of that and find z8s 4k60 or 4k120 raw to be amazing, but i understand where your coming from there. Thanks for elaborating

[@m0nztam0nk]

The lack of a 240fps mode is especially curious since the z8 has such a megafast sensor… but ive shot a7s3 ans z8 and i prefer the results from the nikon, will be interesting to see what the z6 brings!

[@cameraconspiracies]

@@m0nztam0nk It is strange, because 8k 60p raw sounds a lot harder than HD 240p lol. Z6 III can do 240p but in 8 bit only and a crop apparently.

[@m0nztam0nk]

@@cameraconspiracies damn…8bit? That sucks. Nikon has internal HQ RAW that really sets them apart, and especially in Photography especially well, their colourscience is on par with Fuji, its really good. But Sonys are just the more reliable and built out cams: redundancy recording, amazing af and lowlight…but the results colorwise were just harder than id like to admit…for certain stylized looks it dont matter, but if good, natural rich skintones is a target Nikon really convinced me (me: mostly wedding filmmaker and some Photography, so thats my priority)

[@ElRubio864]

I view every single video since like 3 years ago, and I have to say that Sony with zeiss looks great. Though for wildlife with the 200-600 I really dont like it, I much prefered Gh6 with leica. Me personally I use Lumix S1 (Waiting for mk2) and S pro lenses, there you have sooo much pop and contrast, I really love the Image

[@mbenjamin292]

Where are my badges?😊I want the alien head come on.😊

[@shutterlag192]

Idk about Sony but canon and Nikon standard profiles are both “generic over edits” as a photog bum and not a video guy I do love my Nikon raw files. Every brand has something you have to balance out. Ps the Nikon 58 1.4g is my go to. Try that one

[@ItsJFox]

👽 Which camera do you recommend for a high quality podcast, that doesn’t overheat? FX3, FX30, S5iiX, GH7?? 🛸

[@trueatfalse]

0:18 "this is not working" lol 💪😅💜

[@CO8848_2]

Zeiss 3d pop is immediately killing the Nikon.

[@-grey]

It seems like you really do need to change profile based on what you're shooting with Nikon, just like with Fujifilm. Whatever the Astia Portrait colours are called on Nikon, you should have that one before you point it at your face.

[@-grey]

Also put on a blue t-shirt it will help with the perceptual colour cast a bit.

[@zetacrucis681]

Nikon has the better sunburn science

[@robjackson2731]

Huge fan of the nikon sunburnt look. Blownout highlights are a nice touch as well. The great debate, jaundice, or cooked lobster 🤔??? You should have kept the canon 😂

[@SMGJohn]

My OLED monitor is pretty much colour corrected and your Nikon footage is not looking great colourwise its way too much magenta, Sony not so great either with its weird yellow hue thing going on.

[@Adogcallednoortje]

Again you made us question!

[@oshcan]

Nikon looks better

[@sunlit777]

not really, just a bit more contrasty profile. He never told us what settings he used on either cam. If he was shooting log in sony, then no wonder Nikon looks better, since he cannot grade sony log properly =)

[@cameraconspiracies]

@sunlit777 I did mention exactly what I was shooting in, pay attention.

[@cazschiller]

14:30 while I agree somewhat, the difference is so small that I think it doesn't matter. More about if the system suits the buyers workflow etc

[@cwills75]

Agreed. Indoors the Sony colors were obvious each time. The red in his shirt is too pink, yellowish skin. Outdoors it's not even fair. Sony looks washed out, low contrast, low dynamic range, reds and greens are massively worse, sky looks like crap, etc., even without all the focusing issues.

[@sunlit777]

@@cwills75 yeah, spot on! that is exactly why all videographers opt for Sony and exactly ZERO for Nikon! 😉

[@flightographist]

Might just be me but nikon glass looks good in natural light but sucks in practical...usually. You can buy a blow up alien for 25 bucks, it's one of your mascots- put it to work in the focus department.

[@borlach321]

Your face looks more red on the Nikon. Not sure why.

[@James_118]

Sky looks better on Nikon whereas Sony has slightly warmer tone.

[@davidstewart3168]

Have he got jaundice on the nikon

[@mattbondcomposer]

"It's got some rendering, that could please a woman, in a village, somewhere." This is what I come here for man 😄

[@drewherbi]

Still like the look of nikon better but can confirm that 85mm 1.2 is hot garbage. On the very rare occasion the autofocus hits, its a great image. Not worth it for the trouble of always losing focus though

[@perseusarkouda]

Nikon is like "Ok, we are doing video now. Just give us about 20 more years to make it worth it."

[@lekmusic]

Only watched the first two minutes but thank god the Sony with zeiss had the better pop or I’d have to sell my… Sony with zeiss.

[@edwardekman9832]

No camera has perfect color without editing. All can be made to look good. Camera purchases are due to personal choices. Most people stay in the system they start with, due to loosing money by switching. There will never be a perfect camera for all things. Some may come close though. I watch this for the comedy!

[@christinasmith9032]

It would be fun to see some episodes without blurry backgrounds. Sony colours seem to be way better

[@Digmen1]

I'm a Nikon fan boy with a Z6ii and a Zfc I must admit that on the Nikon videos at the start you look sunburned. I have not seen that in my videos, but then again I don''t take many videos.

[@pinkgiraffe808]

Did you do a video testing all the Nikon picture profiles outdoors yet? When you first tested indoors, the Rich Portrait gave you beautiful skin tones, no homo. Looked fantastic. Now here we are outdoors and I cant help but eat my words, as you resembled a rabid, sickly vampire beaver with no blood flow. On a more positive note, lookin thick, cut, and juicy! May have to purchase MONKEY STRENGTH myself to compete! Edit: Sony does look better overall here, tested on 2 monitors and a phone. Nikon Kelvin WB is much higher, Sony's is very warm.

[@Sebastian-lw1ei]

1:22 You got me with this one, I thought the opposite 😂 So Nikon gives you a red face but less red shirt while Sony/Zeiss more pleasing face skin tone and actual red shirt 😂 Though Nikon has much better focus and dare I say 3D pop 😮

[@m0nztam0nk]

Ive shot Sony 4years professionally (a7s3) and now to a Z8…Nikon wipes the floor with Sony when it comes to colour… and yes, i could get the Sonys to look good but always had to work against the base colour science in slog and Nikon starts so much better…and in Photography its even more so…

[@TheLinesEnd]

Also how is Nikons video autofocus STILL that bad.

[@scottj9773]

Sorry trolls.... Sony by a comfortable margin based on the vision provided - Ex G9 Panny user here

[@samhodgkinson8901]

Sony was better in almost every shot, but it was doing something weird with the tshirt colour, Nikon makes it look more natural...

[@glennn.3464]

The skin tones on the Nikon seem a bit too red but it clearly is not blowing the highlights of the lamp in the background like the Sony. Standard profile for Nikon is not the best one for a natural look. Choose wisely...🤔

[@stevendente9270]

If you went to a Dermatologist with the Rosacea on your face shown by the Nikon colors, you would leave with a prescription to try and treat the problem.

[@jer3006]

The only way all your testing contests will work is if you invite all of us to your apartment to view the results on your camera screens and on your monitors. Yes, it is a sad truth about the Internet, KZbin, and individual displays. 🤣 But don't stop doing them- the entertainment value is priceless❗❗

[@MikedieONE]

i can ALWAYS pick out the sony easily.. just go with the one that looks greener and its 100% the sony in 100% of the times.

[@daviddrew7624]

Great video as always, I'm probably completely wrong and know nothing 😂😂😂 21:15 but I think the Sony was by far the best today 👍

[@TCMx3]

opened the nikon 85/1.2 to max aperture and immediately got transported to a plantation wedding smh my head

[@KungPowEnterFist]

We're going to compare Nikon lenses to Sony's(*) equivalent lens. *Almost all of the lenses in this comparison are not Sony lenses, but rather made by other manufacturers. Nonetheless, Sony will be given credit for having made these lenses. In fact, let's just assume that all lenses for every camera system are made by Sony. Sony is the all time greatest manufacturer of camera equipment. Only they could have accomplished this.

[@Probabilmente]

From 2:43 to 2:55 the bottom right camera name is wrong ;)

[@cameraconspiracies]

No it's not.

[@Probabilmente]

@@cameraconspiracies it's not Sony? I was thinking so because you switch camera!

[@JoATTech]

First two looks, Sony wins. I'm surprised. And I guessed wrong. Nikon skin looks like reddish nightmare.

[@random_dev]

So I'm the only one thinking it's like pointless of comparing a mainly still camera versus a video centric one...come on... saying you don't have slow-mo.... For the same price point you have the Z8, with all and even more than the Sony...8k 60 (yes we don't care), internal RAW😅 And for the color, I prefer the Sony, but that does not make it, "true colors", they are muted, more cinematic. But look at the sharpness, the Sony is far behind. But again, it's more cinematic....so which is best depends on yo and your need. But Hell no, the Zf is not here to be compared to a A7SIII 🤣

[@cameraconspiracies]

Z8 doesn't have a flippy screen. ZF is the only one that can be used for my purposes, so it's the only fair comparison. It's not my fault Nikon has been this slow at adopting something all the other camera companies have had for years.

[@random_dev]

@@cameraconspiracies You’re right ! Sony has better vlogging cameras. But that’s still a silly comparison.

[@cameraconspiracies]

@@random_dev It's youtube production, and it translates to many other genres of filmmaking.

[@KrankyPandas]

To me the sony looked better in standard with auto exposure.

[@sidburn2385]

Cmon be reel, you left is our right.