Excellent presentation of the soundtrack in movie pictures, explains the mysteries of sound recording on film. Thanks to Prelinger Archives.
Пікірлер: 32
@wealthistime2 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU! Wikipedia was no help and i couldn't find anything as good that explains clearly how sound on film actually worked.
@Nonamer983 жыл бұрын
Today I learned that the term “soundtrack” came from the literal sound track of film. I’m so glad I stumbled on to this!
@amberola1b12 жыл бұрын
I liked variable density soundtracks of old films because they had great high frequency ability, but bass frequently became distorted. And i noticed that when it switched to the variable area soundtrack, that the background hiss became less to almost non exsistant, because the area which was`nt being lit up by the "shutters" to photograph the sound was black and not exposed to the photoelectric cell. I also agree this was a very informative and well made film.
@ganeshsuryawanshi73564 жыл бұрын
The best video I have seen related to this topic .Trully useful and interesting . Loved it . Was really amazing !!!😄😄😄
@stewieblast Жыл бұрын
I love how simple and precise the explanation is, can't see this quality in any modern KZbin videos
@johnwiiu7005 Жыл бұрын
Depends on the channel really. Here you can have crap or gold. In the past, making these movies was expensive therefore more thought was put in therefore less garbage was produced.
@BrunoTicianelli3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for archiving this on youtube, so cool
@Narayan_19964 жыл бұрын
The name of the piece playing at the end of this video is Danse Macabre. P.S: I HIGHLY reccomend the Pipe Organ version of this piece. It is pure joy to my ears.
@AshwaniKumar-lj9vf Жыл бұрын
Thanks for Very interesting video
@panditjee16 жыл бұрын
very good presentation about sound recording and reproduction by photocell
@Meltback2 жыл бұрын
Astounding, everyone who contributed to this is amazing.
@martinjones59652 жыл бұрын
fascinating - light valve satisfied my curiosity how recording done.
@AlessandroZir Жыл бұрын
very nice!! ❤️❤️
@xdqd4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, i was always curious about this
@panditjee16 жыл бұрын
very very thanks
@tejbhanverma59043 жыл бұрын
Amazing vdo
@mihirbist87976 жыл бұрын
Superb
@AlmightySnowz15 жыл бұрын
Is the difference between the variable density recording and the bilateral variable recording because the lightvalve has a much more delicate system? Because he said both were identical but there was definitely a difference in sound quality. Is this because of the system used or just the video?
@jeffdonahue14363 жыл бұрын
Could Mandelbrot on raw image create better than FLAC sound?
@maantube3 жыл бұрын
May be... Analogic is an image of reality as it is, whereas digital is always an artifact
@wopmf4345FxFDxdGaa20 Жыл бұрын
@@maantube Well, not really. Analog is, just like digital, limited / modified by the system you use to capture the signal. Benefit of digital is that you can copy it endlessly without loss of information, meanwhile in analog, the errors of the system always accumulate the more you copy or process it. Analog representation of a signal is in no way more or less "real" than a digital presentation.
I have read your comment and clicked those time marks several times and I still have no clue what's going on.
@wigwagstudios24744 жыл бұрын
Drew Broadway LMAO that makes it funnier
@drewbroadway6374 жыл бұрын
@@wigwagstudios2474 Oh my God, this comment is 8 months old and you replied to me in 2 minutes. What a freaking plot twist. Almost expected you to teleport behind me after I read this.
@wigwagstudios24744 жыл бұрын
Drew Broadway LMFAO
@drewbroadway6374 жыл бұрын
@@wigwagstudios2474 Bravo sir, I'm speechless truly. Peace be with you, long life, and happiness.