Sovereignty in the UK

[@lonestar05071965]

A very interesting view point and thank you for that. May I as,k has the Act Of Union not been breached by the formation of the Scottish and Welsh assembles?

[@drfegg288]

Hi! Thanks for the interest and good question. The answer is no as the regional assemblies enjoy only derived/conditional authority. The delegation of power is described by Parliament's own laws and so Parliamentary Sovereignty - and other standing constitutional arrangements - are preserved Good question and thanks again!

[@lonestar05071965]

@@drfegg288 Thank you Paul and i must confess due to ignorance on my part and only discovering during covid that we have a constitution and a Bill of Rights. I am however intruiged with the whole historic and legal workings of England the Union and the creation of British so thank you once again

[@drfegg288]

Great! enjoy your studies. It's fun - or should be :) @@lonestar05071965

[@lonestar05071965]

@@drfegg288 hiya Paul and it sure takes time to get ones head round the subjects but i feel as a Englishman I need to know these things and I've definitely subscribed and will be so viewing your videos

[@Beliefisthedeathofintellect]

Nobody has authority. And who thinks they do are deranged and unlawful. Everything is an offer to contract. There is no man between my God and I!!

[@Beliefisthedeathofintellect]

@All About Britain anyone up for a bit of compartmentalised cognitive dissonance? Brought on by a comprehensive education which programmes to a tacit acquiescent state of mind. Which makes you think you even overstand what the word God even means. Ffs. Dumb arese think it's a man in the sky. Read a blacks law dictionary. It will tell you they think we are all dunces if you do not know. You are!!

[@Beliefisthedeathofintellect]

@All About Britain lmao. Again your tacit acquiescence is strong. All laws are British. All commonwealth and more. Everything is under the BAR aka the British accountancy registrar. Ffs.

[@Beliefisthedeathofintellect]

@All About Britain you can not even b bothered to look to what ad hom means you dumb twat. Your ad hom is that of a 10 year old. Ffs. Leaving me all the room to ad hom you in return for your arrogance. You do not read a dictionary, you do not read a bible you stupid brainwashed fool.you study them. I have 8 dictionaries here I have a very expensive halsbury encyclopedia and 4 different blacks. 4. 6 9 and 11. I have a 1986 strouds jurisdiction also. I also have another 16 others. Tell me what a legend means? It's going to b funny for Google is your 🧠. Mine is books.ahaa. you programmed fool

[@Beliefisthedeathofintellect]

@All About Britain obvious at this point you work for the corporate. Let me tell you. Just for a corporate to speak to me wrong in any way Leaves me no option but to track a sue. Any corporate involved with prejudice on the people is a crime on the people. And has a very healthy lawful remedy attached. Which I have completed many times. If Google twitter you tube or any other refuse. My remedy will double. Happy days. Here's to taking everything from fools who push false claims on the people. Vicarious liability has a rope attached to it all through history.

[@Beliefisthedeathofintellect]

@All About Britain Boy!. In fact the blacks law books in every volume says that you are a dunce. Facts there bro. You are a dunce bcos you will argue and call names when you have no idea on wtf your talking about. 100% zombie. The irony is funny as fuk.

[@drfegg288]

Thanks for that and glad I could help! Do let me know if there are any other areas you would like to see explained. I am also available for tuition if required! All the best, Paul

[@karlmcglue9946]

We are the sovereigns

[@daverok1113]

Very interesting however to those like myself who lack literacy on such matters how does one distinguish Govt guidelines, Eg. Coronavirus restrictions from actual law? A strange thing happened to me the other week, I was in the park sat on my own on a bench when a Bobby came up to me and asked what I was doing I replied just taking a rest, he then proceeded to say ''Okay but make it quick if you're still here in 10 minutes I will be having a word with you'' So I left, I had not been out for days but just left to avoid the hassle or a fixed penalty notice What can I do make a crucifix out of my two index fingers and say ''I do not consent?'' We are now in the position where the Govt have seized all basic rights and freedoms and are talking up mandatory vaccination for a cold virus with a 99.8% recovery rate I am not quite sure what to do, there appears to be no kind of pushback from human rights organisations and very few with any knowledge of the law willing to either offer basic advice What do you suggest?

[@JimCrossan]

I thought you would start with the sovereignty of the monarch. I'm Scottish and am as sovereign as a king.

[@ThePp12345678]

The power of Trial by Jury and why it is so important to our rights. We can only be Judged by our equals, the Jury judges by their sense of right and wrong and if they think a Statute Law is unfair or unjust, they can state not guilty (as they are going by their innate sense of fairness). That Law would then have to be wiped off the Statute Books, there is a case to reference what I am saying and a plaque in honour of the Jury that is in The Old Bailey. It used to have pride of place so all could see the strength and fairness and most importantly our power to overturn Laws. It has now been moved to a quieter part of the building for obvious reasons. The case was in regards to 2 men arrested for preaching the Gospel without a permit. Worth looking into it! If you want to know more things that are hidden deliberately from us, look up The British Constitution Re-Exposing it's secrets. Everything stated can be verified easily yourselves.

[@drfegg288]

Hi and thanks for the comment. No one can strike a law from the statute books except parliament. A jury can return whatever verdict they can stomach but that does not challenge the integity of the law. This is the nature of parliamentary sovereignty and it sits at the centre of our system. As for jury trial, I'm a fan and would recommend the Secret Barrister for a thorough critique of our legal system. All the best Bert

[@ThePp12345678]

@@drfegg288 if you look at The British Constitution Re-Exposing it's secrets, it explains how jury trial originally worked up until it was distorted. The Plaque in the Old Bailey which used to have pride of place is about the trial of William Penn & William Mead. The plaque is is in honour of a Jury trial & the jurors who refused to give a guilty verdict, as they felt the Law was unjust and so the judge locked them up for 2 days and 2 nights without food but the did not give in. They based their outcome on "judging by conscious". And so the Law was struck off the statute books. Maybe you could look into the case & why the plaque no longer has pride of place in the Old Bailey. The people are Soverign not Parliment, Parliment was created by the people to protect their rights from a tyrannical Monarchy. You cannot have something created becoming more powerful than its creator. Thank you for your reply

[@anthonyferguson4218]

Except it doesn't Parliament can not start talking about a bill without queens consent, well king now. So the Majesty’s of the realm control all, Parliament is a decoy

[@anthonyferguson4218]

@@allaboutbritain3367 that means absolutely nothing. The monarch has full control and can dissolve it. The government is the monarchs front arm. Its sole purpose of existence is to remove the monarch away from the blame of the people. Like a game of chess and the public are playing draughts

[@ptag5209]

​@@anthonyferguson4218 lol there is no monarch. Not since the 1st of January 1973. Here is the evidence fco 30-1048 docoment. If there is no Regal. Then the legal is a trespass on the people. Prejudice Tyranny

[@ptag5209]

​@All About Britain the government are our trustees! Our agents. Our debtors. We are the creators, creditors drawees and beneficiaries the government only have say if we say. They are corporate. Corporate can not own land nor property. No fines fixtures nor forfeiture with out judgement from your peers. Bill of rights 1689 stands in perpetuity. People are to scared to stand on their own overstanding and ready to watch their kids marched off for what ever reason some over zealous corporate scum wants. Fuk u.

[@ptag5209]

@All About Britain ahaaa brilliant 👏

[@ptag5209]

@All About Britain your so fukg acquiescent its not funny dude. The problem is opinions over fact. Triggered Karen's can not even research the meaning of a word. Never mind a fact. You make an ass of your self when trusting an assumption. Fool. LSB! Ruined you. And your to stupid to shut up. Very corporate like.

[@rachelb8863]

The common law courts also known as common law also known as constitutional law is above any governmental or parliamentary or legal ruling. You are talking about rules and not the common law. Edith Just to confirm, the common law trump's statutory law!

[@allengustavo9288]

A tip : watch series on Flixzone. Been using it for watching loads of movies during the lockdown.

[@ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ-ΠΑΥΛΟΣΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΑΚΑΤΟΣ]

t thought the political and legal Sovereignty is derived from the crown and the crown gave authority to the parliament permanently but the queen has as much authority to pass laws as the parliament as both the queen and the parliament are required for any new law to be valid, and the queen has the authority appoint anyone she wants to be priminister so all authority the parliament to appoint the gaverment is derives be the authority of the queen that she has the authority to revoke. it seams the queen has a lot of authority but not any power as there would be a revolution if she attempted to use her authority

[@drfegg288]

Hi and thanks for the comment. It is opportune that this is coming up now as the royal prerogative is under the microscope in a way never previously seen! It helps a lot if you think of the Royal Prerogative as consequence of the emergence of constitutional monarchy from absolute monarchy. The monarchy (ie kings and queens) gets to survive but the powers they just to enjoy get transferred to the Crown, which is an abstract concept represeting the powers of the state, and are controlled and deployed by the ministers of the crown, that is the government. When Boris asked the queen for permission to prerogate a couple of weeks ago he wasn't really asking for premission (just as the monarch cannot really refuse to assent to legislation) but rather performing the weird dance that is demanded by the constitutional settlement we arrived at in 1688, since formalised by common law and subject to control by parliament through statute law. And as Baroness Hale made clear on Tuesday, this really matters. We do not rely on monarchs, who claim their authority from God and accident of birth, to bestow legitimacy on our political system. We may technically still be subjects but power flows upwards from the people through parliament, and this is exactly how Hale justified the reining in of prime ministerial power. Hope this helps and thanks again for the interest! Bert

[@ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ-ΠΑΥΛΟΣΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΑΚΑΤΟΣ]

​@@drfegg288 so if the queen refuses to assent a bill passed by the houses of parliament can then a court or the parliament declare it law anyway and have the authority of any other statute? (and i know she wouldn't be that stupid to do that for PR reasons) if the answer is no then she has the power to do it. and king George the third vetoed a law long after the glorious revolution.

[@ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ-ΠΑΥΛΟΣΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΑΚΑΤΟΣ]

@@drfegg288 and regarding the government after 1688 Victoria appointed lord m with the opposition having the majority, and in WW2 the king took temporary control of a a part of the army without the knowledge of the government to stop a mutiny of sailors i think and in the 70s there was a hung parliament so the queen appointed the party with the plurality to form a government

[@ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ-ΠΑΥΛΟΣΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΑΚΑΤΟΣ]

@@drfegg288 and regarding the pm's recommendation, the queen has not absolute authority as the crown has delegated some of it's authority perminantly to other institutions like the parliament and the supreme court but not all

[@drfegg288]

@@ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ-ΠΑΥΛΟΣΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΑΚΑΤΟΣ This is one of those occasions when you play the 'that would provoke a constitutional crisis card', and sit back with a confident and knowing look. The glue holding our constitution together is Good People Doing the Right Thing, and whatever one might think of the concept of the constitutional monarchy generally, in matters of public policy the queen has always behaved with impecable propriety. Shame the same cannot be said of her ministers (of all flags) Cheers!

[@dmomcilovic9185]

Become a freeman of the land