Everything and Nothing: Part 2, "Nothing" 4k

Jim Al-Kahlili asks one very simple question: What is nothing? His journey ends with profound insights about reality. Everything came from nothing.
This award-winning film takes us on an epic journey to uncover the true size of the smallest particles in nature and the science of empty space, which scientists now believe is teeming with energy and exotic matter. Part science, part philosophy, and part history, this film offers a gripping and spectacular exploration of cutting-edge science with the acclaimed British TV host, Jim Al-Khalili.

[@quasarsupernova9643]

The kind of dedication and patience required to put this together is truly amazing.

[@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin]

For real. Had to wait like 14 billion years.

[@josephpk4878]

Love the analogy of Dirac's equation being likened to the "compressed meaning" found in a poem.

[@uglydoor1]

Incredibly great series I can’t imagine any educational shorts being of any higher quality. This presenter is hugely talented and compelling. I just love it.

[@seekter-kafa]

he is only a small part of a team

[@I-am-awayTOM]

So good to see the professor again! Even if it is over nothing.

[@zif-rp9rh]

Incredibly well made, what a journey! The narrative is so clear, so beautiful.

[@BrianHalcrow]

As a layman with an interest in the universe this is probably the two best videos i have seen to aid my understanding

[@TheDavidlloydjones]

Neither of these videos is a layman.

[@1984oner]

Same here brotha....

[@gabel5188]

I agree the quantum biology one is really good as well. As all good documentary’s should you feel much brainier at the end of the program that you did at the start lol!

[@JeffreyBaenisch-do8xt]

Add one more same here

[@brucemacmillan9581]

Jim's presentations are always top level stuff. The subject matter is difficult, but he always makes it interesting and easier to understand for us mere mortals who aren't so great at math and physics. Good production values also help a lot.

[@paulmichaelfreedman8334]

Everything said about Dirac's personality points towards a good dash of Autism.

[@charlesmartin1121]

"Emptiness is what makes up almost the entire Universe." One of the most profound and unsettling facts in science.

[@joestitz239]

But it's this emptiness that allows balance. One going around one !

[@James-ll3jb]

Why? God needs alot of elbow room.

[@tricotdiko1435]

@@James-ll3jbRight? They don’t call him the “god of the gaps”for nothing!😅

[@James-ll3jb]

@@tricotdiko1435 "Five Quantum Phenomena Supporting God's Existence" kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqq0iGmAnMRpsJI "More Quantum Evidence" kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWe6h2yAja2KqKM kzbin.info/www/bejne/emGtfpaaeZJjiKc "An Investigation into Alleged Scientific Evidence for Design" kzbin.info/www/bejne/eWa9Z5uVh7ubf9k "Cancelled Science: Some Evidence Atheists Don't Want You To See": kzbin.info/www/bejne/inKXgqiqq92Lbpo "Return of the God Hypothesis kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJCbgYOFYsh0oqM "By Design" kzbin.info/www/bejne/qInIqZSMqNubea8 "Choosing between Science and God is Advocacy for a False Dichotomy" kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqrXanh5op2Jb8k What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? Modern scientific insight has revealed startling evidence for intelligent design from various disciplines, from biology to astronomy, from physics to cosmology. The purpose of this article is to summarize some of the major arguments. What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - From Biology In recent years, William Dembski has pioneered a methodology which has become known as the “explanatory filter,” a means by which design can be inferred from the phenomena of nature in particular living organisms. The filter consists of a sequence of three yes/no questions that guide the decision process of determining whether a given phenomenon can be attributed to an intelligent causal agency. Based upon this filter, if an event, system or object is the product of intelligence, then it will: 1. Be contingent 2. Be complex 3. Display an independently specified pattern Thus, in order to be confident that a given phenomenon is the product of intelligent design, it cannot be a regularity that necessarily stems from the laws of nature, nor can it be the result of chance. According to Dembski, the explanatory filter highlights the most important quality of intelligently designed systems, namely, specified complexity. In other words, complexity alone is not enough to indicate the work of an intelligent agent; it must also conform to an independently specified pattern. Among the most compelling evidence for design in the realm of biology is the discovery of the digital information inherent in living cells. As it turns out, biological information comprises a complex, non-repeating sequence which is highly specified relative to the functional or communication requirements that they perform. Such similarity explains, in part, Dawkins’ observation that, “The machine code of the genes is uncannily computer-like.” What are we to make of this similarity between informational software-the undisputed product of conscious intelligence-and the informational sequences found in DNA and other important biomolecules? What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - From Physics In physics, the concept of cosmic fine tuning gives further support to the design inference. The concept of cosmic fine tuning relates to a unique property of our universe whereby the physical constants and laws are observed to be balanced on a “razor’s edge” for permitting the emergence of complex life. The degree to which the constants of physics must match precise criteria is such that a number of agnostic scientists have concluded that, indeed, there is some sort of transcendent purpose behind the cosmic arena. British astrophysicist Fred Hoyle wrote, “A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.” One example of fine tuning is the rate at which the universe expands. This value must be delicately balanced to a precision of one part in 1055. If the universe expanded too quickly, matter would expand too quickly for the formation of stars, planets, and galaxies. If the universe expanded too slowly, the universe would quickly collapse before the formation of stars. Besides that, the ratio of the electromagnetic force to gravity must be finely balanced to a degree of one part in 1040. If this value were to be increased slightly, all stars would be at least 40% more massive than our sun. This would mean that stellar burning would be too brief and too uneven to support complex life. If this value were to be decreased slightly, all stars would be at least 20% less massive than the sun. This would render them incapable of producing heavy elements necessary to sustain life. What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - From Cosmology With modern discoveries in the field of cosmology, the concept of a definitive beginning of the cosmos has been demonstrated almost beyond question. The Kalam argument states that: 1. Everything which begins to exist has a cause apart from itself 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause apart from itself Today we have abundant data that the universe had a beginning. Given the Law of Causality, there must be an uncaused first cause existing outside of space and time. This first cause, being uncaused, must be eternal. Observations of the nature of the effect lead to the conclusion that the first cause must be intelligent and powerful enough to bring space, matter and even time itself into being. What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - Conclusion This article is but a brief overview of some of the key elements involved in the design inference. The purpose is to demonstrate the wide body of support for intelligent design from a large range of disciplines, including biology, physics and cosmology. FOR FURTHER STUDY Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design by Stephen Meyer.

[@kurtklingbeil6900]

Isn't that just a better of projection and mistaken interpretation related to scale jumping ? People relying on their perceptions of their 5 primary senses resulted in stuff like The Bible and FlatEarthers. Unable to accept the limitations of their observations and the apparent surprises and contradictions, elaborate mythological storylines were created. Eventually, bit by bit, clever people made observations and derived interpretations therefrom which varied from the conventional habituated storylines. The *surprise and shock" of each new and increasingly subtle and precise observation was tightly linked to the clinging to the old.

[@justdev8965]

This takes the 'I'm not a mistake" phrase to a whole new level

[@DonaldTruss]

another excellent description of the universe around us! Thank you Jim!

[@seekter-kafa]

get a room

[@paulmichaelfreedman8334]

I've never seen a documentary about nothing as long as this one.

[@Number6_]

Nothing is impossible the optimist said. He was right. Once you point at nothing. It becomes something to see.

[@tincupnickleboythe1st700]

Thank you for making this understandable, im not a math guy at all, but i did understand and could comprehend all of this at a bare bones street level, thank you !!!

[@ndahuraaugustine9339]

I love this so much it almost answers all the questions I always had. Thank you so much

[@stratocaster539]

Very profound, incredibly overwhelming, great stuff

[@jipangoo]

Hush little muppet

[@AwesomeIam]

Mind boggling truth unearthed by this documentary. Absolutely loved it, was so captivating.

[@petergreen5337]

❤Another excellent programme. Thank you very much publisher. Thank you very much Jim .

[@sumitpatange9455]

This 2 part series is way more entertaining and we'll explained than any science movies out there..kudos to the creators, I was blown away by the connection of "TV screen and microwave light"

[@nosequerock1738]

INCREDIBLE - I'm recommending both videos to everyone I know!!!

[@richoworthington8520]

In other words nothing is something, because nothing has a name...

[@rodrigoayarza9397]

What a production! A masterwork from Nic Stacey.

[@vga-t7m]

nothing is one of our many concepts about everything. its either there is something or there is nothing. and that nothing only refers to what our minds can gauge, no more no less

[@IhsaanAdams]

This is the best explanation I have ever found on the quantum world. Amazing documentary!

[@BrunoRegno]

Sir... I have to stand up and effusively applaud your analogy used to explain Heisenberg's uncertainty principle... The way you used total file size to explain quantization impact on acuity is simply smart. Kudos!

[@waryinzero]

“Nothing” would mean no dimensions, no quarks, no time, no space. “Nothing” cannot be visually or physically perceived by our brains.

[@croozerdog]

i love how there's like 100 people with different definitions of nothing thinking they're smarter than youtube science communicator man

[@kkap895]

It can't be perceived because it's nothing. It's not limitation of our brains. It's the inherent nature of nothingness itself.

[@pietdewit351]

As Nikola Tesla said: 'ether exists!'. It is in fact the so-called 'vacuum'. From there matter is created. Compare ether with 'water' and matter with 'ice', and you get the idea.

[@baruchben-david4196]

Tesla was mistaken, as the Michelson-Morley experiment confirmed.

[@CreativeSoul333]

Part 1 & Part 2 were such great videos! Thank you for sharing this knowledge 😊

[@Life_Is_A...]

I wonder if it could all go away as instantaneously as it started. A terrifying thought but also very beautiful.

[@whirledpeas3477]

Now I know everything about nothing.

[@morgunstyles7253]

I know nothing about everything

[@TwinPhoenix666]

Having watched both parts of this documentary in immediate succession, I can confidently confirm both of these statements. I'm doing so, I, too, know EVERYTHING and NOTHING.

[@yhamid110]

You know nothing if you claim you know everything 😂

[@iiiiiiiiijj]

There is nothing to know about nothing because it doesn't exist , only the word ! . .

[@kennethsnyder9236]

And the fact you are something

[@billandpech]

The explanations in these 2 videos leave me unfulfilled. It's like asking "where did the computer come from" and being told the computer store and then asking "where did the computer store come from" and being told "it always was"..

[@lrvogt1257]

At the fundamental level some things are just brute facts. That's not to say we know what those are yet.

[@tracyrussell4561]

Completely agree. Anything that changes is created. Anything that is created changes. The vacuum was created, time is created and so is space. There must be an originator, a necessary existent. You cannot even have infinite regress. Think it's called the contingency argument.

[@lrvogt1257]

@@tracyrussell4561 : I am unsure that the vacuum was created since "Nothing" is nonexistence. It is not known if the universe had a beginning because time is a function of space and mass. Without events between things there is no time. It is not known if anything was "created" as that implies intent. Intent implies awareness which requires time. You can't make a decision or an "if - then" without "now and then"

[@thunkjunk]

"NOTHING" is not a difficult concept. It does not exist. Space is not NOTHING. Neither is EMPTINESS.

[@MrBesmir7]

indeed; space is sth that gravity disform that and when gravity pay too much with space create BLACK HOLES

[@dominicsamf2895]

Shouldn’t it take 0 seconds to travel through nothing? Surely space is something. I just don’t understand lol

[@kurtklingbeil6900]

Artifacts of scale- and perception-jumping... Take the cat out of the box - now it's empty. Look more carefully - cat hair and dander... Remove those Now it's empty. Look more carefully and use sensitive instruments - there are gases... Evacuate them NOW there is nothing. and on it goes .. Are EM fields, cosmic rays, quantum fluctuations non-nothing ? Depends purely on the scale of sensitivity / perfection / esoterica one chooses to fetishize

[@jclow9601]

Human brain can't conceive Nothing, as as soon as you think of nothing it still becomes something.......st*ner view

[@1Sparrow1]

​@@dominicsamf2895You are correct, but you have to travel at the speed of light. A photon does not experience time or distance.

[@Roggy2806]

Always mesmerised by prof Al khalili ' s documentaries

[@EwellFaul]

I'm so glad I found this video again. Truly fascinating! I'm no mathematical genius, but I do understand its significance.

[@peterdobos1606]

gives a whole new spin on the phrase "nothing is impossible"

[@RamonOrellana-z7g]

Science simply just want to avoid stepping into the realm of metaphysics.. This "apparent emptiness" just conclusively points to a Divine Force holding the whole "invisible potencies".🤩

[@tommyroche9142]

Oh please...🙄

[@buso007nitrox]

This series was amazing! It cleared up some things for me on matter/antimatter and dark energy.

[@larryscott3982]

I’m always disappointed when a vid listed as posted 4 days ago is a vid I’ve seen years ago. How many ads can you have in an hour?

[@ScienceTail]

Absolutely right this gonna look like cheating with viewers

[@festeCanuck]

I wouldn't know...ever heard of KZbin Red?

[@bricesuire5072]

Dude I’ve watched almost everything on this stuff I was bummed too.

[@bricesuire5072]

@@festeCanuckI have it but it doesn’t skip on this. Only music.

[@richardsutton4828]

Same video, different channels, maybe?

[@djayjp]

*Correction: actually, the uncertainty principle may only be epistemic, not ontologic. There are various many, equally valid, interpretations of QM, some of which state that it is fully deterministic and that particles have defined positions and momenta at all times, just that we're unable to measure both such values with equal precision at any one time--note that such locally real interpretations require either multiple universes, non-local FTL causality, or Superdeterminism.

[@alessandrorossini8704]

Both parts, 1 and 2, are equally great. 👍🏼👍🏼💪🏼💪🏼

[@pittasso]

Profoundly beautifully explained! Thank you all for this amazing documentary! May the force be with you 🙏

[@marinpetrurosca2944]

I believe everything when you actually explain beyond reasonably doubt how big bang took place in the first place!

[@larryfulkerson4505]

All this time I thought that Dirac was a theoretical scientist but I've just now discovered he was a real live person after all.

[@pierremartineau9179]

Fascinathing documentary. It is now 13 years old. And like a once super modern computer, in this world it is already a bit obsolete. I am not a scientist in any way but it seems to me that every generation thinks it as arrived at the thruth, that it as all the answers. One of his last sentences, « a world created out of nothing » like a certainty is largely disputed today. Today the question is: « what was there before the big bang? » We cannot imagine an eternal universe because we are temporary beings.

[@pennyserenade192]

If this is unspeakably amazing, and just awe inspiring beauty and elegance doesn't convince one of the existence of a Creator, of a living, breathing Universe knowing itself ...of God, then I don't know what can.

[@zack_120]

1:18- That is what makes me wonder how red shift is possible in a vacuum where no force, no grab, no nothing to act on the lights to stretch it 😇😱

[@Mybrothafromanothamotha]

I do love these videos. Can't imagine how it could be more on point and digestible. 😮👌🏾

[@Awesome2844]

I remembered the saying, "Silence has much to say"

[@maryannbroadbridge1119]

Excellent presentation and beautiful graphics. This video is strangely comforting. Thank you!

[@kedarnathgantayat7136]

Thanks spacerip.❤

[@blijebij]

So, what does this all demonstrate? It shows that, even though we are often unaware of it, we see ourselves as objective observers (on a human scale), which isn't logical, is it? Thus, is it surprising that at a scale far beyond what our eyes can perceive, there exists a whole world of quantum field fluctuations? What we have labeled as emptiness was, and is, nothing more than our direct experience with the vacuum. This isn't an objective testimony at all. Therefore, the question isn't what nothingness is; the real question is what 'something' is, especially at the smallest, tiniest scale.

[@JaceFredericks-t9i]

Anybody else think it was creepy When other dude was super close,quoting the Italian dude about us living in an ocean of air?

[@audioartisan]

It seems that what we term 'emptiness' is just what nature terms potential .

[@markbeck3748]

So Michaelson demonstrated that there was no aether, and yet we proved through the existence of the Casimir Effect the existence of the quantum foam, which takes up every last cubic inch of space in the entire universe. It sounds like we simply replaced the notion of the aether with the "quantum foam."

[@jerrykrampera8145]

Finally a common sense reply. Thank you sir for confirming my own understanding and restoring my faith in humanity that not everyone swallows blithering nonsense. Michelson in his own words said that he only proved that there is no wind or drag to slow down light's perturbation speed C through the aether. Mental giants like Faraday and Maxwell built modern day technology based on "Electromagnetic spectrum" of the aether. Tesla said light is nothing but a radio wave through the aether. Einstein gave the aether "qualities" of time and objects composed of the aether location relative to an observer or sensor. These objects are a higher stable energy manifestation of the aether e=mc2 or matter. (Created by wave reinforcement [rogue waves on tsunamis].) Like ice and steam are different stable levels of energy in water. Needing a value for Albert's math to math, a background energy level at rest he called the cosmological constant, is a value of the aether, but he changed the notion of aether with "fabric of space time". Aether became "quantum foam" after Plank measured the energy level (in stable energy level "measurements" [not particles] called electrons ) around a proton of a hydrogen atom. (A dynamo with gravity and energy fields like planets stars and galaxies.) Hydrogen is the building block of the periodic table of elements with increasing levels of aether energy. Radio astronomy calls the aether "cosmic background radiation". Cern call it the "Higgs field". To deny the existence of aether is like Galileo's inquisitors insisting that the earth is the center of the universe.

[@jagpreetsingh83]

Amazing work!! I wish to get more understanding of dark matter, dark energy and overall what is this vacuum/vastness. Why it exists?

[@Bruk55sem]

I want to remember i heard this documentary when i reappeared in another time and another place... I loved from the moment it started to the moment it ends. And i want you to write me a love letter for my crush because she has been quantum physics until this day and you would have explained it how much i loved her and run in to me...

[@christorres3487]

Another Jim Al-Khalili interesting video

[@Thecsyu]

Thanks to nothing we are able to witness these 2 exceptional episodes!

[@sripadbhat8014]

Profoundly enlightening

[@leokovacic707]

What a beautiful series

[@lukmanwalujo1962]

Thank you Jim

[@rezadaneshi]

Visualizing an infinity- if I travelled at light speed towards any galaxy 10 billion light years away, it will still eventually fall out of my visual horizon and if I lived forever, I'll be further away from it then, than I'm right now due to expansion. Visualizing Singularity, nothing is Forever in time dilation

[@_quandary_]

If you traveled at light speed, time stops for you, so you would effectively live forever. It takes light time to travel, but for the photon, the travel time was instantaneous

[@rezadaneshi]

@@_quandary_ correct. Photons don't experience time so photon is never aware of its location or existence. Time doesn't stop and traveler gets to go everywhere and do everything. Time traveler will be near frozen in spacetime and trillions of billions of years will pass in mare seconds for the traveler and universe ends in a whimper from time travelers point of view.

[@kevinsayes]

Good analogy on infinity, but I think it still draws out, and leaves unanswered, the actual conundrum. In your analogy, the universe could still have an edge but be functionally infinite because the rate of expansion vs. c at any given distant points. But if we could pause expansion (not that we could, but since it seems the rate has fluctuated over time, and it seems to have a starting point, I think it’s “okay” to manipulate this variable and what’s left over would still represent reality. Because again, it seems it’s changed within that reality before), would the universe be actually spatially infinite? I feel like where on the surface of a sphere, something akin to that, so functionally infinite to us, but not actually infinite. But that’s just my coin flip; I don’t think we’ll ever know. Interesting example.

[@dr.satishsharma1362]

Excellent.... thanks 🙏.

[@miguelsuarez8010]

We and everything around us are popping in and out of existence all the time. The average between something and nothing goes in favor of something, by a minimal fraction.

[@brightphoebesays]

He has an excellent voice for presentation. : ) He's engrossing.

[@MichaelCleveland-v5h]

There are two spots where there is no sound, please see if you can fix this? Jim is my all time favorite host Scientist!

[@juanjasso6431]

Nice presentation... still no answer by Science to knowledge about life.

[@jj74qformerlyjailbreak3]

That's cool. I listened to I guess part one Now I get to listen too part too. That earns a sub.

[@DihelsonMendonca]

Why these documentaries are around several years on different channels ? It seems they keep removing and re-uploading them. 😮😮😮

[@sandeepmanari9037]

I have several questions regarding quantum fluctuations, matter and antimatter. Firstly, in the scenario where a quantum fluctuation occurs at a black hole's event horizon, trapping antimatter inside while regular matter escapes, what are the potential consequences? Would the annihilation of trapped antimatter inside the black hole lead to a creation of energy and possibly affect the black hole's properties? Additionally, considering the escape of matter from a black hole and its conversion into energy, does this process challenge the conservation of mass? Lastly, how do these interactions align with the law of conservation of energy-momentum and our understanding of black hole dynamics and cosmic evolution? I'm curious to understand these phenomena within the framework of modern physics and cosmology.

[@sidensvans67]

Excellent video . Fascinating , Thank you .

[@rodmarker2071]

maybe it's not space that is expanding, but that the 'outside' of our space is shrinking. That would exolain the acceration, as the more it shrinks the less it is and the more our 'space' is needed tp replace it. take a sphere of 1 cm radius and then 1 of an exponetially growing radius, the circumfernce starts to streatch at an ever incraeasing speed just to stand still

[@davidweinrich5135]

Of course the ultimate question is: Why is there something rather than nothing (absolutely, truly, nothing)? Period.

[@RealityReload]

00:06 Exploring the concept of nothingness 04:20 Straw's behavior reveals nature's dislike for empty space 10:34 Scientists discovered strange properties of vacuum 13:36 Michelson's groundbreaking experiment on the luminiferous ether. 19:25 Michelson and Morley's experiment disproved the existence of ether. 22:21 Vacuum technology revolutionized science and technology. 28:15 Heisenberg's uncertainty principle explained in quantum world. 31:24 The vacuum is alive with quantum fluctuations. 36:38 Dirac's unification of quantum physics and special relativity 39:29 Dirac equation expresses profound truths about the universe 45:02 Vacuum is not empty, but teeming with matter and antimatter creation. 48:02 Measuring tiny changes in electron behavior using lasers 53:31 Quantum vacuum fluctuations shaped the universe. 56:26 Universe's creation from matter and antimatter annihilation.

[@chadwickallison6277]

"Space" as a MEASUREMENT. It's the distance between electrons.

[@roydoncrerar2852]

Thank you for this insightful look into reality. It seems the more I try to understand the less I actally know. At the same time, the more I try to know the less I understand. It's all very confusing yet utterly facinating. 😮😂

[@saifsirang9080]

as layman from void virtual particles create and destroy... The power of nothing we neglect we can't perceived... It's fascinate me to rethink miracles of creature

[@azlanameer4912]

Ancient mystics were true when cried WE ARE NOTHING.😢

[@Luke-r5s]

I had to do a speech to pass my school certificate, and when I was asked what I was going to do it about I chose to do it on nothing. It took a while for my teacher to realize that I meant I was doing it about nothing and not just doing nothing, she was like 😮. But yeah I concluded that nothing is a real paradox. In being nothing it becomes something, that is it becomes the thing that doesn't exist -nothing. The only place nothing could exist is nowhere, because if you for example removed everything from within a jar you would have a vacuum and not nothing. So yeah I agree, it's really hard to define and it's a real paradox.

[@chriscooperman6102]

Very well made docs.pt1 and pt2. Congrats.

[@TheTheurgist]

Again Awesome job folks,, thank you.

[@spocktiberius2456]

We live in a reality of opposites. For every concept their is an opposing concept. A concept and it’s opposite exist simultaneously on a shared plane. For example the concept of up exists simultaneously with the concept of down on the plane of direction. Therefore, the state of “something” cannot exist without its opposite state of “nothing”. The problem with “nothing” is how to measure it with tools made of “something”.

[@hustlinc3540]

We can't percieve and comprehend nothing because we as humans tend to give everything meaning.

[@jordanjackman1537]

There IS. Have hope.

[@official_prashantkumar6464]

Thankyou for the information ❤

[@stefanblue660]

Great Dokumentation! But, to explain it more detailed, cosmic Inflation should be mentioned, not easy to explain, but overwhelming, it explains how it came to the big bang!

[@jerrycheah7516]

The fact that Nothing actually exists is both Terrifying and Exciting at the same time

[@spaceghost8995]

Nothing does not exist. If it did you could travel a billion light years instantaneously because nothing would be between you and where you are going. Space itself is not nothing as far as I know.

[@DIYbyJoan]

This is the best science documentary ive seen. I can easily understand it. As if im genius. Hahaha

[@EricA.Ephemetherson]

We can ask the question: where does this quantum fluctuation get energy from? If an anti-particle appears in physical vacuum and then it disappears into vacuum, therefore the must exist some energy that allows for that and it cannot be the energy of vacuum but of some kind of negative energy existing in the non-vacuum entity. Also, E=mc^2 is not Einstein's. It belongs to Olinto de Pretto who published it in 1903.

[@tracyrussell4561]

Completely agree. Anything that changes is created. Anything that is created changes. The vacuum was created, time is created and so is space. There must be an originator, a necessary existent. You cannot even have infinite regress. Think it's called the contingency argument.

[@EricA.Ephemetherson]

@@tracyrussell4561 Why does there have to be an originator? The word ''created'' implies a maker. But don't use that word. Forget ''created''. And you can have an infinite regress. As well as there is +infinity, there is also -infinity.

[@jerrykrampera8145]

@@tracyrussell4561 so using your logic, the necessary existent said "let there be an originator" and poof there was change. but then we would need an origin for the necessary existent to change from. that would make all of us changelings into necessary existent originators . and on the seventh day i rested. poof. poooof poooooooff. oh oh i think the original originator just regressed and became unnecessary existent. The only thing that is necessary is infinite change. if you need an originator , fine, you are welcome to him . we all (including you) have had 'enough' of wars his name. way too much of our children being slaughtered in classrooms by his imperfect creations, using machine projectile sprayers that gluttonous, hypocrite institutions indulge, protect and promote. indigenous peoples being enslaved and erased from existence. is this the originator you completely agree with?

[@JeffreyBaenisch-do8xt]

Absolutely mind blowing

[@sumantagoswami-pk5im]

Among the best 👌

[@thomasg.7592]

What's up with the audio?

[@wazzuptrey]

I think they manipulated the audio to dodge copyright strikes by KZbin

[@willemesterhuyse2547]

Space is something: it has permittivity and permeability.

[@CandidDate]

Picture a pump with pressurized air molecules bouncing around. What are the molecules and how do they have freedom to move? Well, they are little balls of energy that are free to move in the aether. Certainly, if they are to move at all, they must have room to move? Therefore, every molecule is surrounded by aether. The aether moves with matter. Michaelson-Morley disproved!

[@TheToyBoy]

Just amazing, thank you ❤

[@slimal1]

Just saw this is my recommended. Looks like an interesting topic. However, upon checking the list of videos I need to ask: how are you able to produce so many videos each day?

[@baranyiproduction]

What a teacher, narrator and production! Huge stuff to understand the universe! Thank you!

[@freeforester1717]

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is analogous to Vogt’s theory of how matter comes into being. See Diehold Foundation, series 1, part 3

[@DutchRichard66]

"Empty Space" is not "nothing". Although empty, Space(Time) is something. It's an expanse; how tiny that may be.

[@Wolf-Spirit_Alpha-Sigma]

So you've re-uploaded a BBC doc, but why does it have such low-fi audio?

[@world_still_spins]

The way oversimplified verson: Vacuum sucked so hard that matter got pulled into existing from nothing, but the matter was like 'there's nothing here, I'm going back. Peace.' Some stayed though.

[@kurtklingbeil6900]

An artifact of perception and scale. There exists a strong thread of insistence that everything exists and occurs at all scales... Which simply us not true. Consider the two-slit experiment ... Has it ever been successfully conducted at large scales? i.e. a human running toward two human-scale slits (or the American version - a car driving at two car- scale slits. Consider quantum effects ... To build quantum computers , the extremely rarefied exotic esoteric conditions for quantum states to occur must be carefully created and suitable interfaces provided to achieve the programming and data exchange. The. Presumption that "quantum is everywhere always" by the meatsuits is just silly. Meanwhile the existential predicaments and MetaCrisis perpetrated by centuries of colonialism and willful deliberate hyper-consumptive hyper-emissive eco-cidal psychosociopathic dominator cult-ure gets actively ignored and denied - often with fraudulent esoteric rationalizations

[@pedrozarate9658]

Hi, I have a question on that mirror experiment Has any one tried to put a measuring device (an observer) just to see if the atoms will act different? Maybe they'll slow down?