SpaceX's Massive Changes on Starship V2 just HUMILIATED the entire rocket industry!

SpaceX's Massive Changes on Starship V2 just HUMILIATED the entire rocket industry!
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: [e-mail]
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.co...
===
SpaceX's Massive Changes on Starship V2 just HUMILIATED the entire rocket industry!
The evolution of Starship is something anyone could have guessed. Yet, when it officially appears, everyone is still surprised by how SpaceX is upgrading their giant spacecraft. Indeed, as new Starship 2.0 hardware has just been spotted, the upgrades are truly astonishing.
In today's episode of Great SpaceX, we will delve into these insane upgrades and what they mean for the future of space exploration. So, if you're ready, let's get started.
Before we get to the updates, let’s take a look at some of the first steps related to the V2 prototypes in recent times.
Firstly, in early April, a part of the Starship ring (likely V2) appeared, showcasing many differences from previous versions. Then, in mid-May, a flap was shipped to Starbase, clearly marked as part of Block 2. By mid-July, we witnessed the impressive appearance of the nosecone and payload compartment. Recently, the B15 forward domes also made an appearance.
SpaceX's Massive Changes on Starship V2 just HUMILIATED the entire rocket industry!
With the goal of producing six V2 prototypes this year, we can expect production to continue at a rapid pace. Other parts will likely become more visible in the coming months.
Now, let's delve into the changes that have been revealed.
As previously mentioned, the nosecone will feature some notable modifications. The first significant change is in the flap system. Elon Musk has revealed that the flap's position will shift towards the leeward side. Previously, the flaps were placed symmetrically, creating a 180-degree angle, but they will now create an angle of about 140 degrees. This adjustment will help the flap avoid direct impacts during re-entry.
Additionally, it appears that the flap has been moved closer to the top of the Ship. This change will likely enhance navigation by pushing the focus of control forward, balancing it with the aft flap.
SpaceX's Massive Changes on Starship V2 just HUMILIATED the entire rocket industry!
In terms of shape, the new flap is smaller and more pointed. The length of the top and bottom edges is longer, while the tail edge is shorter. The effectiveness of this design can be debated, so feel free to discuss your thoughts in the comment section.
The next change is in the heat shield system. On the new nosecone, the heat shields have been extended to the leeward side. This extension provides better protection for the vehicle and serves as a backup protection solution for the flap and the header tank inside.
Moreover, the thickness of the flap seems to have been reduced to about half of the current flap's thickness. Since the flap has been moved to the leeward side for increased safety, its mass can be reduced to optimize the Starship's design. This reduction in mass should make the flap more flexible, thereby improving navigation efficiency.
----
We use images and content in accordance with the KZbin Fair Use copyright guidelines: www.youtube.co...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: [e-mail]
To be resolved, thank you.

[@philipwittamore]

Titles like these are humiliating

[@CCGR-2024]

V2, I am excited to see a version 2 starship and see all the changes but am most excited to see it come back in one piece and then a crewed launch later in time then Starship will be a true starship. I am truly looking forward to the future of Starship!

[@mitchellhouston4444]

I'm looking forward to Elon Musk Making Space Great Again. 🚀🇺🇸M.S.G.A.🇺🇲🚀

[@jackarmstrong2793]

getting sick of your click bait titles adverbs and adjectives they detract from your credibility its HUMILIATING.

[@genemetz1945]

I love the information you present but hate the choice of words for your title. Click bait titles are getting tiresome..

[@jamav8r]

Why would the entire rocket industry be humiliated because a company made modifications to their rocket design? Make that statement make sense to me.

[@user-ml1ki8ml1z]

❤️I like these MASSIVE engineering marvels🤗🌱

[@debbiecotter917]

Humiliated? This is a work in progress, many trials and errors and successes. Sheesh.

[@Robert-mls]

Yes, I’m sure everyone is humiliated.

[@Erik-oe7gc]

Continuously improving the space ship, what a good idea.

[@user-ec4zb9hz1x]

Use her for more testing. She is a great ship .

[@benethoukes8519]

Haters gonna hate, Boeing can’t get their spaceship back, blue horizon can’t even get to space despite being how many years behind their own plan, plenty of humiliation by SpaceX.

[@harrystofberg5794]

The facts speak for themselves words mean nothing compared to actions and results

[@benethoukes8519]

@@harrystofberg5794 I am, what’s your excuse?

[@jeremeywise8696]

Video and content good in that they provide information. But why do we keep posting headlines and inserting phrases such as "Humiliated" etc... I don't see that as anyones goals in the industry, and how is that constructive outside click bait.

[@dannypope1860]

This channel has become PURE clickbait…

[@johnrday2023]

Changing nose cone lifting points from six to four is no small change due to to change in stress loads ! Redesigning forward flaps looks promissing, and great that they had the experiece of Launch #4 to provide them with key data ! Amazing how quickly Spacex can modify design and build mods !

[@jonathanreyes1622]

I enjoy looking through the comments every time he puts out a video and I do think he is putting great effort in his videos, keep up the good work

[@colonbina1]

Thanks your huge support

[@sonnynguyen2653]

V2 is on its way🚀🚀🚀

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent stuff bro, go Elon

[@w.p.3539]

WP watching LIVE from Guam

[@christopherwhiteley8476]

you are completely right with this video, thanks for the good content mate

[@colonbina1]

♥️♥️♥️

[@ralphsavlov651]

Launch dates will depend on how quickly the FAA can get their heads out of their asses!!!

[@colonbina1]

Hopefully, they can solve everything soon

[@kstoneace]

I do like your channel, i dislike the clickbait. it cheapens your good channel

[@colonbina1]

I noted this, thanks your feedback

[@MrGhostLt]

Old news and just repeated word for word what other have said all ready. Cant you come with some that is unique content and just not re-post stuff.

[@matthewsolis7075]

Dude seriously if it wasn’t for that one blooper I’d think this was another AI slop Chanel

[@Copimi]

The Humiliator strikes again.

[@vegasvato55]

I think that one of those starship prototypes will be used for the nuclear engines for the mars missions??? Chemical Propulsion to Orbit, and Nuclear Prolusion to Mars..

[@metriczeppelin]

Clickbait title, AGAIN......

[@alexandermakesstuff]

I agree. Hey great spacex, love the content bro keep it up just tone it down a bit with the titles

[@6489Tankman]

It deserves a dislike

[@cbnc6861]

Great improvements.

[@colonbina1]

♥️♥️♥️

[@theboatgoat]

another great informative video, thanks for your work

[@colonbina1]

♥️♥️♥️

[@ShelleyEchartea]

Good looking space rocket

[@mcpeko]

Great channel and content, childish titles. Worse than legacy media at this point.

[@colonbina1]

Thanks for your great contribution 👍

[@ricchamen6304]

If nose pins are been used. Are there more closer. Meaning they will get hotter underneath as pins will heat more cause they re closer. Thanks for a great show. Very informative and thorough.

[@colonbina1]

Great idea! Thanks your feedback

[@benjaminblair3619]

V2

[@colonbina1]

♥️♥️♥️

[@barrypinion2976]

V2😊

[@garylester3976]

Well, smaller tiles with more pins, is an attempt at better more secure attachment... Hopefully it works, but I'm the worst tile skeptic... The tiles on the top side of the nose, has me hopeful they will reduce hull angle to more horizontal and get some glide ratio instead of trying to fly sideways. The ships are looking nice now days as fabrication work, The welders have gotten it together obviously. Fore flap design reminds me of Saloon doors... And they are slabbed, kinda clunky for something meant to fly. Ships need a couple portlights forward for eyes, and a smiley face painted on for the kids watching... Maybe a toothy smiley face? A big grin for Bezos to have to look at and grimace about his Turtle production velocity... Not sure about the tower catching, but it is an interesting experiment... I would have probably designed it more passive, like hanging up a pay phone... Slapping arms could beat dents in the ship's sides... And That linear shock system atop the arms is strange, I would have designed the shock absorbers into the catch points of the ships. I'm glad we will soon see Raptor 3"s in action, its been a long wait since the Raptor one Spaghetti Monster engines... I wanna hear other companies comments after R-3's are operational... They are obviously way better designs... See if they try to Buffoon about them, or get to work on cleaning up their garbage engines... Its alot of fun watching Starship progress with SpaceX's: "Fly it & Try it" iterations progress methods... And FAA and other petty tyrants are making themselves look bad to the public... Bureauceatic Constipation at its finest. I just wish all the other companies could increase developement and production velocity like SpaceX so we had more Horses to watch in the race. It is entertaining though with NASA and Boeing screw ups... SpaceX is putting them all out of business if they dont change their ways.

[@colonbina1]

Great comment, bro

[@MurphyRiddle-bl4cp]

Yes, Gary. They all seem to be "caught with their pants down" and are panicking in a small sense. I very much like to compare this to when GM released the Buick Regal Grand National, a V6 Turbocharged mid size coupe from the 80's, it was 2 seconds faster in the quarter mile than the production muscle cars of the era, which had other automakers going into a tailspin which they merely maintained their loss of control rather than compete..

[@garylester3976]

@@MurphyRiddle-bl4cp Yeah, Things were getting pretty absurd there until SpaceX and Raptor 2, and now with Raptor 3, and Elon booting up serious production, most of the rest look like hobby level endeavours... I like what Rocket Lab, and Stoke Space are doing. at least more innovative, Blue Origin looks to be making a nice rocket, But their Motors are Raptor 1 level over complicated, and their production rate is Glacial... I think Elon is great, and SpaceX definitely hard working, but a skeptic of Starship for practicality reasons and limits. But I do attempt to feed in ideas to help them, and have seen many used. Boeing is a sad story to me, as I had a favorite uncle who was an engineer there in the 60's. And NASA is a soap opera now... Sad, having watched the first Moon Landing live, and then having great expectations for the shuttle, and then watching things go downhill from there with a dawning realization that engineering was losing touch with practicality. Got pretty obvious it had gone Academic and Urban. No longer the guys who grew up on farms or did things in post WW2 culture. Its a different cultute now but Elon and SpaceX are the new dawn. Elon at least understands the limits of academic credentalling. And willing to Schittcan those too arrogant to listen to the Peasants... And the smaller startups are satisfyingly creative. I think they are gonna run over Jeff with their cleats on... SpaceX may get lucky on some issues I see with Starship, but maybe not, and maybe other startups will see what I see... I wish them all well, have hopes, And in the Space forums daily.

[@benethoukes8519]

@@garylester3976 they need to fly sideways to protect the engines that’s why the tiles don’t need cover the entire ship and no shielding required for those engines saving massive amount of both weight and refurb time. The only way to significantly change the angle of descent is by major changes to the overall design that would reduce carrying capacity and increases costs as a knock on effect. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

[@garylester3976]

@@benethoukes8519 Dont feel bad! I knew about that logic, I just happen to disagree with it. Have explained before many times in writs. The problem is you get an effect like a key holing bullet at long range, it slows down yes, but also goes into a parabolic ballistic arc, and drops at an increasing rate. which means its going too fast for lower air density and resulting friction. Also more air resistance on the tiles. So you lose tiles and melt off flappers.. and have a burnt derelect by the time you get engines lit and do flip manouver and landing burn. But if instead of flying sideways, you flew it at say 5°-15° from horizontal, you would get more lift than braking even in thinner upper atmosphere, a much longer flight, and reduce velocity turning it into lift, and use distance efficiently, and stay higher longer, and be going slower, and not tear off tile or melt things... Flight profile, its why Space plane designs were developed, they just havent designed in enough lift yet to get to the point tiles or coatings heat shields are safe and effective. And Spacex is trying to do a plunge re-entry profile, like a capsule with tile instead of an ablative. supposedly to get better reusability... They went the wrong way... And arent useing the lift that they could, and arent changing their design or their concept, and trying to adapt by changining tiles and do other expedient cobbling. Which may not be enough... I think its all flawed concepts... And a waste of time... Not to mention money... They'll figure it out eventually, and have to change some other parameter besides tile thickness, size, material, or fasteners. So far its been over 3 years pointing this stuff out... I suspect I will win in the end. Logic often beats cobbling in desperation. Its why we have brains, make for less work and higher survival odds, works for ships too!

[@richardkozloski8019]

Please stop using the “Humiliated x y z” in your titles. It’s just childish and not worthy of your good channel.

[@danb316]

am i dumb, where are the space folks and the space luggage supposed to be? all i see is gas tanks

[@ianalleyne794]

Enough of the click bait nonsense already

[@scientificperspective1604]

When V2 will launch depends on whether the launch towers survive the landing catches.

[@colonbina1]

I think so

[@benjaminblair3619]

We still talking about starliner when dcma declard boeing unfit for duty

[@BMrider75]

Please do not refer to the second version of Starship as "V2". That appellation is already established and all the connotations that go with it . Just use a different term, one without the attached history.....

[@benethoukes8519]

@@BMrider75 they’re not calling it a V2, it is still called Starship, it’s just the second version which is how all iterations are differentiated by all companies. Nobody would be so insensitive as to call a rocket V2 for the very reasons you were effected by the mere suggestion that, that was what it was to be called. It would really be Starship, v2 or in long-hand Starship, version2. Hope that helps.

[@ricchamen6304]

Fuel lines near surface s cause concern and weight shift. One can only hope that the surface skin doesn’t get too hot and effect the tank lines. Effecting fuel burn speed and flow and temp remaining cold as is needed.

[@iamanisland]

I wonder if the placement and size of the new flaps will affect starship’s flight manoeuvrability.

[@seacaster]

HUMILIATED? Really. Is there any chance you could engage some creativity, intelligence, and professionalism with your word choices. We are all dead tired of these cheap click bate words and phrases that seem to fill KZbin. Please. Blessings

[@olivermatasb]

Such a toxic content creator. And consistently posts click baits.

[@thomasbeach7436]

This is about the best channel that I have found for information about what is going on with SpaceX. The others are no match! Keep up the great work please. Thanks!!!

[@404NameN0tFound]

Stop asking us to comment every 5 minutes, its annoying as hell.

[@Vinlaell]

He only said it once? 🙄 not to mention he was talking fast the whole time giving information if he wants to ask us to comment below on a subject who cares its his video you chose to watch it

[@ScottRagland]

@@Vinlaell read the room, bro. channel were the hands down, long time, best of all spacex channels. from finding the channel were almost all vids here did i habitually play at least twice, just for sheer delight at hi production values and mastefully understated presentation. in just weeks have they suddenly become full bore clickbait flat liars, time and again, clearly for clicks for cash cash cash alone. just look at how craycray 'random' are the channel luvs of both lickspittle fawning comments as well as on myriad outright hate comments as this one, specifically calling out such inanities, along w other sudden signs of some sort of channel crew upheaval. the channel has overnight become garbage, daily called out thusly by more and more users. btw, do plz keep up w the wholly irrelevant, as it is pre-k puerile, ad hom snark, won't you?...

[@matfax]

I'm not sure if the tiles will be smaller or if the same tiles will just have more attachment points.

[@dragoncarver287]

I disagree. 6 points are more balanced than 4

[@benethoukes8519]

@@dragoncarver287 nope

[@jeremytaylor3532]

At this point due to the incredible V3 engine and delays in the V1 test program ( Thanx FAA), I think that Space X should just skip the V2 and go straight to the V3. The V2 engines could be sold as since Russia has effectively removed itself as a rocket engine supplier, there is a distinct hole that Space X could fill.

[@camelectric]

The LPC/NDP merge wouldn't change the outcome in Quebec. Besides, if PP commits to defunding the French CBC as he did for the CBC, he could steal a lot of ridings from the Bloc.

[@bikepacker9850]

Oh No.... more Humiliation....

[@dirtylabrat958]

3:15 A sphincter says what? Did you have a mini-stroke there?

[@friendcrow]

Not sure I'd call a rocket the "V2". Just saying. Too soon?

[@patlab555]

Not too soon, but too old, V2 is from the 1940s 😁

[@fionajack9160]

Humiliated ! I guess there’s no need to be humiliated that Alphatech covered this topic yesterday. Not just repetition on this site,, but parallel repetition with others You’d think SpaceX would fly V2 as soon as possible. With FAA induced delays, need to make these improvement jumps as fast as possible

[@jimparr01Utube]

I do think that they will want to expedite commission of Raptor 3 engine. This engine promises to be a major advance in respect of start-up, shut-down and far less probability of engine compartment fires that have plagued the Starship development program.

[@almirria6753]

It looks to me as if SpaceX is working on the tanker version first so that they can move on to the moon & Mars with a fleet of tankers to refuel the manned Starships along the way

[@clivecook3611]

V2…. Keep up all the great work… al in Space X…

[@DanielJeffers-y3x]

why don't they make star ship ufo design

[@thomasmacon7782]

The forward flaps moved to 140 degrees..Make Starship look like DROGONS FACE 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🔥😊

[@peterbarratt8699]

Oh No !! A repeat of yesterday .....

[@ninetailscosmicfox5585]

I wonder what kind of humiliation forced a reupload lol

[@fionajack9160]

Not yesterday, but a week ago. Same material.

[@NumberOneScientist]

PEOPLE ++ PEOPLE ++ PEOPLE !!! --- Some posts by many groups are DAILY posts --- some are weekly -- some are even monthly by design or necessity --- so 'new news' and 'old news' are very much determined by one's personal schedule of work, play, family duties and a multitude of other factors ......... my lab work is quite variable and I missed several postings that I always TRY to watch when they are posted ......... Emphasis on 'TRY TO WATCH'......... SSSOOOOO ......... Over HALF of today's video IS ( WAS ??? ) virgin in nature for me today as I cannot waste my time just watching my favorite video news --------- so I am VERY SATISFIED with today's NEW ( ??? ) INFORMATION !!!

[@tommcmicken4776]

Nasa, another chance, they are beating a dead horse, I wouldn't trust Nasa's Starliner any farther I could kick a John Dear Tractor Truck bare foot!

[@noppornwongrassamee8941]

Is it just me, or does it look like Starship could be turned into a space plane just by upgrading the flaps into being full blown wings? At least that's what it looks like in the thumbnail illustration.

[@straighttalk2069]

It's just you, there's no way that would ever be possible.

[@davidbudd2624]

If you use one more click-baitey title t hat includes the word “ humiliate” I will not open it. Your move.

[@colonbina1]

Thanks your feedback, I noted this

[@user-ou4zr3vn2z]

Gods speed.

[@christopherwhiteley8476]

so how much does it cost per starship launch?

[@ninetailscosmicfox5585]

Definitely more than most people are willing to pay. SpaceX can't even charge less than Russia (a literal enemy of the State) with its contracts to the government.

[@ingecan6331]

@@ninetailscosmicfox5585Russia charge 50 millions per astronaut, falcon 9 can send 3 for 65, not sure where you get other impression from

[@Erik-oe7gc]

It’s costing you nothing.

[@ninetailscosmicfox5585]

@@Erik-oe7gc Not true if they are an american taxpayer. This is a government subsidised project

[@lynnkramer1211]

When the source of all this information is uncovered, will that person or persons be fired or reassigned? I would sure hate to cause someone else to lose their job.

[@johnfranks9271]

The word insane does not mean surprising as in surprising changes will you Americans stop transposing good words for incorrect ones as is sounds……. inane!

[@cannotsay5505]

more click bait, nothing to see here...

[@jambothejoyful2966]

I see in the comments, you welcome the rage engagement Welp as long as everything you say is correct I don’t have a problem with the clickbait titles

[@colonbina1]

Thanks for your great contribution 👍

[@aneam9074]

heres to 26 getting R3s

[@alexandermakesstuff]

Can't spacex just send an emergency crew dragon mission to the iss without crew so butch and sunni can return earlier instead of returning on Crew 9?

[@johnrday2023]

No, because NASA will do anything and everything to fix + retest, & retest, etc to Starliner before they would even consider ever using an Elon Musk rocket/capsule to 'save' the Astro's !

[@alexandermakesstuff]

@@johnrday2023 frick starliner man it's been causing so many issues. Hopefully in the future more companies will offer service to the iss that actually work. Dream chaser is definitely nasa's best bet for an alternative rn.

[@angry_transvestite]

How many Dragon capsules do you think there are? How many do YOU own? Can NASA borrow one? Does NASA have to pay the full $100 million? How much will YOU chuck in?

[@alexandermakesstuff]

​ @angry_transvestite they have 3 operational crew dragons not including crew 8 which is docked to the iss right now. Spacex and nasa could both cover the cost of it. Spacex has also been spending a ton of money developing and launching starship so they clearly have the resources for a launch of an uncrewed crew dragon flight so butch and sunni and get back to earth and see their families earlier and not lose their minds being up on the iss for so much longer than originally planned without having any actual important work to do on the iss. I was just asking a question and what I just stated in this comment was my reasoning for thinking that an emergency mission could be launched. Please calm down and don't get so angry with me. I apologize if I said anything dumb that upset you.

[@cbnc6861]

Aug if delayed by Government.

[@BRAHHHHHH]

Enlargment of spaceship is needed.

[@Max-hu1bz]

Dam this channel went downhill

[@simoncox9404]

V2 could be distasteful for British octogenarians, minority. 😮

[@MrKennyanders]

How are they going to lift and catch with the flaps shifted

[@Elliot-nu1bb]

They don’t catch it by their flaps. There are lifting pins below the flaps just like on superheavy

[@setlik3gaming80]

V2 🖖🏽

[@colonbina1]

♥️♥️♥️

[@thanksfernuthin]

I fail to detect any humiliation. Man, I fucking hate clickbait.

[@LifesaGambleZL1]

when are they gonna have a cockpit area in the starship, that is what I want to know?

[@straighttalk2069]

They don't actually need a cockpit. Nowadays computers fly space ships like Dragon and starship. So-called pilots just input coordinates and cameras provide views of the outside world.

[@LifesaGambleZL1]

@@straighttalk2069 you just contradicted yourself. lol thanks for your input but that question wasn’t for you. Have a good day

[@straighttalk2069]

@@LifesaGambleZL1 😯😆😅😂🤣

[@marcusw86]

Every time you mention the pea dispenser, I expect a pea pop-up or meme. Lol

[@lynnkramer1211]

PEZ. Go back home and look it up.

[@anthonyhall9211]

DO NOT WATCH

[@anthonyhall9211]

Repeat ! DO NOT WATCH !! Rubbish !

[@viarnay]

The nose cone looks like a mouse now...😊

[@Peter-ir3oi]

Hahaha the time it Takes FAA to approve flights who knows when V2 will fly in meantime China will have theirs finished and flown heaps

[@seeker4749]

Well if the FAA doesn't shut the whole program down I would love to see mass production and testing.. but wait u said wait till production of the v2s are completed than testing... But why? Are u trying to imply to slow starship developments down and give blue origin the reigns? Are u nuts? Personally I like things as they are but honestly all the hype surrounding who will be at who blue origin or SpaceX crap is for the birds SpaceX already proved this with falcon 9 falcon heavy and starship flight 4 falcon 9 a has succeeded expectations already with near almost 400 successful in total launches 2 failures and 1 partial failure 3 successful launches with falcon heavy and 1 successful test flight and landing with flight 4 despite a a couple issues with the end of the landing and a tiny set back with 1 engine mishap in the beginning of the launch and 1 mishap engine out upon landing still it didn't go boom but successful launch and landing nonetheless.. mind everyone that starship launches are just testing and data only not an actual full blown system yet but they are 80 to 85 percent progress near 90 percent at most .. but still they almost have a complete system..

[@lynnkramer1211]

Someone needs to look into corruption within the FAA. Someone is pulling a Hunter Biden on SpaceX

[@Funnyvideosorcoolcontent]

first

[@colonbina1]

🏅for you ☺️

[@rickhill789]

S26 could be used as the orbital tanker no flaps and no reentry hardware needed

[@menotyou1234]

Orbital tanker does not re-enter.

[@jaminschmitt]

I don’t like to think about it in terms of humiliation, but I do hope Elon’s example on how to run a rocket company rubs off on other companies. I think Jeff Bezos will be increasingly more involved with Blue Origin in being more hands on. They have the resources, just not the right mindset.

[@Nathan-wx7ez]

How is 4 points of connection more stable then 6? Shill.

[@colonbina1]

Keep discussing this on our channel ☺️

[@SparkySho]

V2 👍🤟🔥🏆🚀🖕🚀👑

[@natayachantakasamkun1004]

❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊

[@RudolfGraspointner]

There is nothing "insane" about new technology. You are insane for thinking like that!

[@kevinbissett293]

I think S-26 is done. Elon doesn't seem to be a sentimental guy. I don't think it will be a museum piece. Boeing need to throw in the towel on the Starliner. Bring the astronauts home both at once. Or one at a time on Dragon. Just do it. Them let's sort this mess out how we are going to deal with them. Starliner is finished.

[@timbrooks2763]

moreover is not a real word!

[@scottswafford2638]

Unsubscribing

[@lonewolfnmoon]

Whatever her name is she should spend some of her pay on a good plastic surgeon.

[@ScottRagland]

here solely to downvote this latest parasitically exploitative 'offering' from the *formerly* best of all Spacex channels, now just one more clickbaiting for cash exploitation channel. fingers crossed toob algoes note my downvote, and cease offering anything at all from such a channel as this.

[@Typical187-]

Laughable at best😂 RUSSIA AND CHINA 30+yrs AHEAD OF THE IGNORANT😂

[@XCX237]

Your ignorance is astounding

[@BRAHHHHHH]

You will see 😂 ​@@XCX237

[@Vinlaell]

Lmao I guess that's why every time they make a new design some random company out of China makes a startup knockoff pictures of falcon 9 or starship or superheavy hoping to rip off some investors

[@josebembibre7298]

Humiliated, what? A rocket that can´t put in orbit a single gram of payload! The whole thing, Mars, the Moon is gigantic scam.

[@launarlami101aviation]

Shut up

[@fredrikabinger4818]

Stupid. Its a damn PROTOTYPE still...not a compleated system. Putting payloads in space is the least problem and as is right now, they can put 80-100tonnes up there. They dont HAVE cargo yet since the system is not finished and have therefore not put anything into orbit yet.

[@afterhourshotrods6882]

What's up with that BIG WHAM-O-DENT on the nose cone? Surely I'm not the only one that noticed it! I've got an Awesome paintless dent removal guy. I cangive you his number if interested!