This was my first Marseille-style deck, & has become my very favorite. It has a quirky but cheerful character which has brought a lot of fun to my Tarot journey.
@Aceofwands6883 ай бұрын
Thank you for this. I can see why. It's utterly charming and a delight to handle.
@tarotquestfr86925 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review. I had confused it with another Fournier I have. This one I didn't know. Indeed it's a shame for the errors in the text and especially for the information from the printer on the 5 of swords. I've never seen a Celtic cross as complicated as that in the layout, even if 11 cards seems the normal number. I'm not sure the printer used the original names, they're the RWS tarot names, aren't they? Too bad for a Spanish tarot from 1736 when the RWS tarot did not yet exist. I really like the colours, except for the orange of the cups. The line of the drawings is rather nice, and I have the impression that this is a deck that could be suitable for children. Although the 22 triumphs lack a certain amount of detail, but I think it's a good challenger to the tarot de marseille. I'll have to buy this one too, thanks for the discovery!
@Aceofwands6885 ай бұрын
Yes the instruction booklet is possibly the worst I've ever seen - for lots of reasons. I am also bemused that they chose to translate some of the names into RWS ones sometimes. I think it would be a great first deck for a younger owner too. I would just like to see the skin tones done like the older print and removing the English names which are not necessary at all in my opinion. I like the use of type 1 and type 2 as well.
@ericdodds49902 ай бұрын
Due to your video I bought the Spanish Tarot
@Aceofwands6882 ай бұрын
@@ericdodds4990 I'm sure you'll enjoy it. A delight to read.