Stainless Steel Precision Woodworking Squares | Deep Dive | Woodpeckers Tools

[@ОлегКравцов-б3и]

Какие они клёвые- угольники! Видно качество, даже нержа в руках! Давно любуюсь продукцией этой компании. Класс!

[@allmywdwrk]

Anything worth having doesn’t come cheap. High quality products across the board. Always enjoy your commentary. Informative and precise. Never over the top. 👍🏼

[@moderntouchfurniture]

I saw this video a year ago, but every time I see it I notice something I didn't see before. Great video. And I love the 4 recommendations.

[@jerelmercurio4754]

Finally someone knows how to make a T square. Sits right on the edge and can mark with different kinds of pencils make these very desirable.

[@timblack33]

As a machinist that took on carpentry as a hobby, I really love working with your products

[@NoelPepin]

Yes I believe this is exactly what I will order! 🤑

[@joeitalia7]

This video has taught me that I need one of everything they make

[@jonathanfemenella8662]

Love all the squares, my favorite is the 642 SS, so handy

[@moderntouchfurniture]

Excellent video, and thank you for your thoughts on what to get if you can't afford ALL of them, that's what I'm getting.

[@nisamja7424]

If only I had the opportunity to choose between Woodpeckers tools options. Nowhere to buy within hundreds of miles.

[@henrysara7716]

Big fan of your products never disappoint me.

[@stanmashek3085]

love your squares but cant afford them. great video jeff thanks

[@AaronGeller]

They do come on sale time to time

[@Suntreecarpentry]

I need them ALL!!!

[@flatearthbear4077]

Like these alot, but when i saw your offering of the adjustable and mini adjustable squares well i couldnt pass those up ! Now its a matter of patiently waiting while you guys make em and ship em ! Thank You

[@styner3001]

Another much-welcome production comparing like-capable tools (like you did w/ the Pocket & Saddle Tee's). If you have other comparative styled tool video's (do you?), I hope you assign them all an easy-to-find name category for your video library. Great job & great tools!

[@guybowers9094]

Good video always enjoy watching

[@johnpi314159]

Love your squares. I do wish there was a rack-it option for the try squares. My tool wall is not big enough for the mdf holders, unfortunately. Too much wasted space.

[@Psychlist1972]

I have both, but prefer the stainless for any measuring or marking. I use the aluminum one to help square up a case. I learned early on not to use the aluminum one with any sort of scribing knife. Quick note on accuracy: the accuracy of the machined steel L doesn't really matter because you are referencing off the aluminum shoulder. Not sure what the tolerances are there, but they are pinned or screwed together

[@toolchuck]

Jeff helped me out in deciding to get the 2616 AL and 1812 SS as an affordable balance on a previous Deep Dive to add to my 1281 AL square. But I as good of a set as it is, adding the 642 SS is necessary being the 1812 SS can be too large for marking smaller work at times. I will be adding it to my collection. Trust me, these are not "Eye Candy", they are precision tools that happen to be a complete joy to use. I used to handle these gingerly, but they don't need it, they can stand up to being used as everyday tools. Hey here's an idea, to help keep some of out of the doghouse with the wife, why not offer a discount on the Deep Dive item for the weekend you present it? I can hear it now "Honey, I had to buy it, it was on sale, you know, like the Spurdle you just had buy for you, your sister and mom". Yes, No, Maybe?

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

Haven't you noticed they usually are? Not always, but Deep Dives usually coincide with a promo. The SS squares are on sale through next week.

[@toolchuck]

@@WoodpeckersLLC Yeah, not always. And the 642 SS isn't on sale, which of course, is the one I need. Making it a standard would be better, just my two cents.

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

Oh, sorry, I thought all 4 sizes were on sale, not just the two bigger ones. But...the 642SS is a standard permanent (anytime available) tool now. www.woodpeck.com/woodpeckers-stainless-steel-squares.html

[@MnktoDave]

@@toolchuck The 642SS and 1282SS are both on sale right now, but only until June 8th. I ordered a 642SS yesterday. Go to their web site, and you will see the sale prices. I liked my 1282SS so much, that I decided to get the 642SS also. Expensive? Yes, but you only cry once, and now I'll have two perfect squares that will last a lifetime...so it's worth it to me.

[@toolchuck]

@MnktoDave Damit! I'm just now placing an order for a Super Fence and Micro Adjuster. 🤦‍♂‍ Yeah, you may only cry once, but they never say for how long. 🤣 It sounds like I should just get the set and be done with it. I know a lot can be done without all these tools, but lord they are just joy a to use. Thank you MnktoDave for the heads up, greatly appreciated!

[@Suntreecarpentry]

Beautiful pencil! I want one! Lol

[@luapkirner5331]

And what are the large holes on 1" centers for?

[@keitho2910]

What are the numbers 1 through 15 on the lower scribing guides?

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

sixteenths.

[@MixingGBP]

How thick is the stainless steel blade on those? I’m looking for a square thin enough to use to check table saw blade squareness with Diablo blades that have teeth too close together to check with thicker squares.

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

They are 1/16”” thick

[@nickgoogle4525]

if you can't afford 4 squares I recommend my personal setup: 2 aluminium plus 2 steel squares... If my math is right those are roughly 4 squares... ;-)

[@MrTooTechnical]

Great vid. Where is the 1281 in stainless. I really want that please.

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

I don't really think we're going to do one with stainless scales on a stainless blade. There's nothing to be gained over stainless with aluminum scales, except excessive weight.

[@MrTooTechnical]

@@WoodpeckersLLC yes please make it. I like the heft of a better square. How are the g10 sales??

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

I'll pass it on to engineering, but don't hold your breath. It would be very expensive and very heavy. Have you felt the stainless with aluminum scales? Nice weight.

[@MrTooTechnical]

Indeed. I want 1281 in stainless please.

[@stevebrooker6206]

Please can you tell me what the circle holes are used for?

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

Those are how the head locks in at every full inch. There's a pin in the head that fits precisely into those round holes.

[@stevebrooker6206]

@@WoodpeckersLLC I can see that for the in-DEXABLE squares but the head is fixed on the 642, 1282 etc

[@stevebrooker6206]

@@WoodpeckersLLC Really! The head is fixed!

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

WHOOPS! I guess I've written that answer so many times for the inDEXABLES that I didn't even look at which video you were commenting on. On the fixed blade squares the holes on 1-inch centers can be used to lay out shelf-pin holes, but their real purpose in life (at least, most of them) is to secure the blade while it is being milled square.

[@koalafan1576]

I’m a typical guy…. Can I just have one of every tool please? 😊

[@lessonsingrandeur]

Am I missing something here, there seems to be some "smoke and mirrors" between accuracy and usage? Accuracy (and uniqueness) is claimed against the solid stainless steel core, but in the usage part the most convenient usage is shown against the cheeks, which are screwed on like others. To benefit from the accuracy of the stainless steel core, wouldn't one have to use it like the framing squares?

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

The cheeks are spotted onto the core with precision machined pins. The guarantee of accuracy to .0085 degrees is to the assembled square. It starts at the core.

[@williamsanders6092]

@@WoodpeckersLLC Spotted? How is spotting done? With spotting blue?

[@GB-mu9ue]

With something incredibly precise. He doesn’t machine them himself.

[@squot1]

You talk about the angular precision of the core, but isn't what's really important the angular precision between the cheeks and the core, since the cheeks are the reference? So the fastening tolerance is added to the machining tolerance...of two separate parts.

[@OFFICIALUND]

You make a good point (I have both the steel and the aluminum, and this had never occurred to me). I’m going to gauge them and see what the tolerance would be. My guess is that it will be well within what woodworking would require. FWIW, I bought the stainless steel models because I dropped the aluminum on the ground once and damaged it.

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

The .0085 degree tolerance is on the assembled square.

[@memezilla4370]

Are these in imperial only??

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

Nope. Your choice, inch or metric.

[@emulgatorx]

I find it hard to find high resolution images of the metric version. Because from the ones I saw, it looks as if you can scribe lines at 1-9mm but not at the full centimeter. It has the big holes but they don't seem to be for scribing and are weirdly spaced. Anyone has more information on that?

[@AaronGeller]

You can scribe at the full centimeter

[@NWGR]

I just got my 1282SS today and I have to say I'm not happy with the condition it arrived... The blade is warped and does not sit flat on a workpiece unless I press it down. I don't need the graduations, so I'm thinking I should have went for the aluminum version. Again, not happy about this. Giving customer service a call in the morning...

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

Did you get in touch with Customer Service? Did they get your issue resolved?

[@NWGR]

@@WoodpeckersLLC I did, the outcome is fair; nothing great. I'm waiting for a return label to ship back the defective square, then I wait for a refund which hopefully includes the original shipping, then I'll be ordering the aluminum 1281 instead. It's slower than I expected having to wait for the label, then for woodpeckers to receive the defective square, then for the refund to process. So it may be a few weeks until the situation is completely resolved. I expected better from a company that carries the prestige that woodpeckers does. I'm sure everything will work out in the end, this just left a sour impression.

[@GB-mu9ue]

I dunno. US prices seem pretty reasonable for such good quality. And heft too. All that steel and aluminium doesn’t come cheap.

[@CornelleJ]

I cant believe he marked on such a big piece of wood with a sharpie.. does he not know the prices of wood right now...

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

That piece of plywood is the base panel for a shop cabinet, and the side I marked on is facing down. No material was harmed in the filming of this program. Please don't call PETP (People for the Ethical Treatment of Plywood).

[@Felix-bh3fu]

Great tools, no doubt ! What I don't really like is the fact that you cannot see the edge, where the square is pressed against...this is a kind of price that you need to pay for having it holding on by itself...

[@WoodpeckersLLC]

If you need to visually see the edge of the stock, you can simply pull the square to the edge and use it in the traditional manner.

[@timhall5226]

I have a few of the woodpecker tools and they are excellent but these are way overpriced! Would love to be able to afford them.

[@pacificdune]

Too bad they don’t make the big SS squares any more.

[@utubeaccount6981]

nice, but they have ask absurd prices for postage to EU.... a bleeding rip off if you compare other shop shipping to from US to EU, and yes they do not even include duties

[@GB-mu9ue]

Woodpecker are about 30-40% more expensive in the UK from a distributor like Axminster. Importing yourself you will have to pay shipping, US taxes and VAT when they arrive. Not cost effective. There’s plenty of European brands making precision tools.

[@utubeaccount6981]

@@GB-mu9ue there equally good alternatives now, but hey who can argued with something that is hyped...

[@paultraue8185]

Come on! That is not how you would use a framing square. You would use the edge that is next to the stock and it would be right on the stock, not elevated up in the air like you demonstrated. Also the way you demonstrated measuring with the framing square, you would be measuring from 1.5 or 2 inches beyond the edge of the stock.

[@fifty1fifty]

Nobody making furniture uses a framing square!

[@davecurda2350]

All of them……wow only if you sold your kidney. I love these tools but come on why so expensive.if they were more reasonable I would have them all.

[@AaronGeller]

I agree they’re expensive but once I got my first square, I understood the value.

[@kubilayylmaz1716]

In europ almost 300 euro small try square.

[@puddytat62]

😂😂the 18 and 24 are $500 not including shipping! I was born in the morning not this morning! Scammers