Stanley Meyer Water Powered car, Lies and Death

[@leoalphaproductions8642]

Well… one of the signs of a brain aneurysm is headache, nausea and vomiting. So that actually explains a lot. It’s entirely possible that he thought he had been poisoned after drinking his beverage. When in reality it was just a symptom.

[@meeachael627]

that's what they want you to think

[@leoalphaproductions8642]

@@meeachael627 I don’t know if you’re serious or just meming 😂😂

[@zenithchan1646]

That’s dumb. Really dumb

[@leoalphaproductions8642]

@@zenithchan1646 care to provide a better theory, instead of just calling it dumb? Or are we really gonna believe something as ridiculous as water magically fuelling cars and the government wanting this guy dead?

[@ashsequeira7126]

I cant disagree

[@danielbarba9711]

What makes his invention unique is instead of high current pulling apart water molecules to hydrogen and water, his invention uses high voltage high frequency to tear apart molecules through resonance. If you are not familiar with the physics behind resonant frequency, this makes sense in the same manner a massive speaker playing very loud music will probably not break a glass cup, but if someone tunes a sound the same frequency as the resonant frequency of that cup, it wont take much more than an average persons voice to break it. His invention is essentially saying water has a chemical potential that if the power input is low enough, the output could be enough to power something like a car.

[@ChrisVSCars]

Thats proper interesting. I would love to read up about it, are there any papers you can link😱

[@KeithGroover]

@Average User -- exactly. That was . . . a lot.

[@TheBlueScarecrow]

@Mission Gameliel The Biblical God is a piece of shit. If you would take the time to read the Bible, you would know; but entrenched dogmatics never read the Bible. They just tout it. Read on... Sending Bears to Murder Children So a guy named Eliseus was traveling to Bethel when a bunch of kids popped up and made fun of him for being bald. That had to suck, and you can't blame Eliseus for being pissed and cursing them to God. But God had Eliseus' back, by which I mean he sent two bears to maul 42 of these kids to death. For making fun of a bald dude. I have to think Eliseus was looking for something along the lines of a spanking, or maybe the poetic justice of having the kids go bald, but nope, God went straight for the bear murder. But on the plus side, that pile of 40+ children's corpses never made fun of anybody again. (4 Kings 2:23-24) Hating Ugly People In what should be good news for intolerant religious conservatives, God really does hate people who are different from the norm. Of course, God isn't as worried about skin color or sexual orientation as he is about whether you're ugly or not. Because if you're ugly, you can just go worship some other god, okay? (Even though God will punish you if you do and also they don't exist.) Here's the people God does not want coming into his churches: People with blemishes, blind people, the lame, those with flat noses, dwarves, people with scurvy, people with bad eyes, people with bad skin, and those that "hath their stones broken." Given that God is technically responsible for giving people all of these afflictions in the first place, this is an enormous dick move. (Leviticus 21:17-24) Trying to Kill Moses In terms of people who God likes, you'd think Moses would be pretty high up on the list, right? I mean, God appointed him to lead the Jews out of Egypt, parted the Red Sea for him, and even picked him to receive the 10 Commandments, right? Yet this didn't stop God from trying to kill Moses when he ran into him at "a lodging place." There is literally no explanation given in the Bible for God's decision to murder one of his chief supporters. The line is "At a lodging place on the way, the Lord met Moses and was about to kill him." The only sensible explanation for this is that God was drunk out of his mind and looking for a bar fight, and you better hope that's correct because the alternative is that God's a psychopath. How was God stopped from murdering his #1 fan? "But [Moses' wife] Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched Moses' feet with it ... So the Lord let him alone." Either the sight of a very unexpected circumcision sobered God up quickly, or he didn't want to touch a dude who just touched a severed foreskin. Still, it's Moses' son who's the real victim here. (Exodus 4:24-26) Everything He Did to Job Oh, Job. Other than a shit-ton of babies, no one had it worse in the Bible than Job, who was a righteous, good-hearted man who believed in God with every fiber in his being - which is when God decides to see how miserable he can make this dude before he gets upset. Note: This is a result of a bet between God and Satan. Also note: The bet is God's idea. He's literally just hanging out with Satan - which is kinda weird when you think about it - when he starts bragging about how awesome Job is. Satan points out that Job's pretty blessed - he's rich, he's got a lot of kids, etc., and he probably wouldn't be quite so thrilled with God if he didn't have that stuff. God downs his bourbon, presumably, and tells Satan he can fuck with Job all he wants. Satan does. He kills all of Job's children and animals, burns down his house, destroys his wealth, and then covers him in boils. Job doesn't not curse God, but he does wish he'd never been born (literally) and begs God to kill him, but no dice. This lasts a long time until finally Job wonders why a just God would be so shitty. This is when God pops up and basically tells him..."Shut up, I don't have to explain anything to you." Job, having finally done something wrong, pleads for mercy, and God eventually gives him back animals and children - new ones, because the old ones are still dead. Because of a bet that God made with Satan. For kicks. (Job 1)

[@Man_fay_the_Bru]

Bollox in other words

[@danielbarba9711]

@@Man_fay_the_Bru It actually makes sense, the only question is the by product and leftover chemical potential. If he is creating hydrogen from water and burning it to create heat and water again, that would raise suspicion since you can never receive more than what you put into a system. I don't think the military was interested without good cause, it makes sense why he "died" and his publicity too. He would step on a lot of big toes in the oil industry

[@jeffjohnson895]

Big oil killed him. In my first year of college, my Harvard educated professor told us that when an invention is made to combat big oil or the automobile industry, those people are either killed out paid off and never heard from again. Don't you think there's an engine out there that could run off of water or can get 100 miles to a gallon? It's possible but big business has quashed it.

[@jacquelebob4349]

Why wouldn’t they have taken the idea then, they could have been way ahead of their competition

[@bobthebuilder6521]

Yes a large conspiracy with absolutely no witnesses.... very likely. Considering his patent is public domain what's stopping the next big company from using this tech for insane profit? Is it more likely that the invention wasn't as beneficial as previously thought? Or I guess "Big Oil" somehow tracked anyone interested and just payed off or killed anyone attempting to use this invention without any witnesses, people going to authorities despite being paid off, and no traces of any malicious actions, and conveniently paid off any authorities that would investigate... gee I wonder what's more likely.

[@timmack2415]

If anyone killed him, it was probably one of the people he scammed into investing into his nonsense. He made millions from innocent people who didn't know better. What a POS he was

[@notreal5513]

Bob Lazar just made a hydrogen powered car last week its real but it's illegal to buy lithium 6 so you can only make it with a particle accelerator but other then that it would solve the energy problem look it up right now mother fucker Bob Lazar water car or something

[@Earthangel171]

I believe it bc pharmacies and gas companies will killed to keep cures and solutions from coming forth to save us.

[@zaynebooker223]

Here before the government demands KZbin to take this down

[@danvirsethi8171]

To many know know

[@besanchez09]

You still here

[@worldsfinestsimp6421]

They won't

[@uwipped]

Yea I agree,they just wiped out Aaron saulter..

[@waylonscott6162]

It’s not the government it’s big oil companies

[@palesabontle1270]

Just like how they killed Nkosinathi Nkomo here in South Africa because he invented a water purification system that would have helped Africa with the drought crisis

[@belitithd284]

Humans best organism?

[@ronaldphetlhe9547]

Share with me more info

[@caseyjackson853]

Share everywhere. We all need to know what the scum that floats atop continues to reign upon us...Thank-you

[@anthonywilliamson2080]

He didn't use electrolysis the same way we use it. He ran a high volt electrical frequency through the water that vibrated the water and fractured the H20 bond apart. That's how he got the huge amount of hydrogen at a low power consumption. It's not amps but volts and frequency + container volume.

[@AllinRoyalty]

FACTS!

[@newparadigm1374]

And do you have any helpful sources or related scientific publications for that as evidences to support your claim?

[@ChrisVSCars]

Yes please ill make a follow up if you can send me the link

[@ChrisVSCars]

Nope still waiting

[@pkillor]

​@@ChrisVSCars It's not just a resonance frequency, it's more a matter of a frequency that is modulated over another carrier frequency forming a train of waves. These values in turn will depend on the size, surface area, type of water, separation, etc. This configures a condenser where water is part of it, (pure water works as a dielectric). And to make it more efficient as it works on alternating signals, AC then it is more efficient to increase the voltage and decrease the current. In the comments of the video link, there is a link to schematic documents that Meyer made. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pJPOZoN5j8RqipY

[@Springfieldemcee]

Murdered and then they smeared his name.

[@ChrisVSCars]

I didn't say he wasn't. In fact i said it does make sense 😂

[@lstealth]

@@ChrisVSCars wasnt his invention dangerous?, water is already running out in some parts of the earth....

[@ChrisVSCars]

The idea was that rain water would be able to power the car.

[@parkerbragg7093]

@@lstealth he said you can use any water including salt water but idk

[@parkerbragg7093]

@@GetReal77 infinite fuel glitch?!

[@thisone2540]

This guys argument is: I can’t see how it would work so that means it doesn’t Guy was definitely murdered

[@alisonhilll4317]

It's all to with the oil industry and money , we have been lied to for a long time, please research everything.

[@rapscallion3421]

@@alisonhilll4317 are you sure? I thought this had to do with the soda and chip business

[@ChilledBacon]

Problem is, on paper it shouldn't work, and was breaking a few rules in thermodynamics. If it did work we would have to rewrite the rules

[@thisone2540]

@@ChilledBacon ye man but imagine going back a hundred years and trying to explain how the internet works or how we get electricity from a magnet

[@ChilledBacon]

@@thisone2540 well its far too advanced. we have a fairly decent understanding of physics, and that we straight up cant make energy out of nothing. if it works irl (which it shouldnt) it would mean our entire understanding is flawed, and all the text books would have to be re-written. and if the government did kill him, then they would have to take his design into consideration considering it breaks a few laws of thermodynamics.

[@joshuabowen316]

My question for all the conspiracy scientists explaining Meyer's work in the comment section: if his special "resonance" electrolysis method is so simple and you all know so much about it then why cant any of you replicate it?

[@charliewade4875]

Don't burst their buble

[@albynospyder4120]

yeah, don't bust their (Michael) buble. lol.

[@understandingunderstanding4880]

The Security guard just got killed in the Buffalo mass shooting was working working on a water powered car there's a video on KZbin

[@charliewade4875]

@@understandingunderstanding4880 the question is... is it cost effective to mass production?

[@isaiahmiller2748]

@@understandingunderstanding4880 what security guard, I have a genuine curiosity, can you find it again?

[@henryofskalitz2228]

Explain how his cars disappeared within a week of his death

[@famaccount479]

It doesn't. His brother who was fully involved in the build process and never got killed (what a coincidence) keeps it for a long while on their family property and give it away later.

[@henryofskalitz2228]

@@famaccount479 it wasn't given away it was stolen dude

[@famaccount479]

@@henryofskalitz2228 No, that's just a lie. Do your own research and don't just believe random bs videos.

[@datheoryof]

That's not a lie. His invention is gone !

[@sabvrao]

@@famaccount479gave it away to whom ? Surely they could trace it down ?

[@SlayNetwork]

they poisoned me!

[@timmack2415]

If anyone poisoned 'ol Stanley, was likely one of the poor, innocent people that he scammed out of their life savings.

[@lwill4075]

And come to find out.... The officer(Aaron Salter) that was one of the ones killed in the Buffalo Grocery store shooting, was working on a water engine as well. Fishy asf

[@mtttony]

The information below is derived from the work of genius twin brothers Stanley and Stephen Meyer.Many years of study,reading 42 patents and endless hours of Meyer lectures, documentaries and radio shows gives me the chance to show the heart of their research. If you want to run your car on water then this is a viable and realistic set of stages to go through to achieve such a goal.. First you must ask yourself why has it not been done in this day and age..A car combustion system that can access the large amount of energy available in electrolysis gas from water. It is commonly known as Faraday electrolysis. It has high mass conversion losses. Mainly heat.This process alone is a poor option as an engine will not produce enough electricity output to power an electrolysis unit to supply enough gas from the water to realistically cover the car engine's energy requirements.. Many have tried electrolysis gas production methods with very limited success. So what are the steps to rethink this problem?.. Step 1 Striving for a highly efficient electrolysis cell is the first step. Your electrolysis cell will not make enough gas to keep the engine running from the car's electrical output.But this is the first step.And the more efficient you make your cell. Be it through the physical construction or efficient driving circuit,or both Step number 2. As in step number one you can make gas from your electrolysis cell. This gas fuel starts as water and is converted to gas. The gas is fed into the combustion zone where the second conversion takes place..In the second conversion the gas is converted back to water,with a given amount of energy release.This is the water to gas and gas to water conversions or energy states. Step three. We know by now that the first conversion.Water to gas is energy intensive and has a large amount of losses.This is where many hundreds of hours have been spent by people trying endless ways to improve the efficiency of electrolysis. Without taking into account they are dealing with not one mass convention in making the gas. But two mass conventions. Water to gas and gas back to water. This second energy conversion has been mainly overlooked by the majority of people studying in this area. So we must take a closer look at this second conversion to see if there are any ways of improving the reaction efficiency at the point of combustion.. Step 3 Conversion factors for gas to water. It is not well known that the conversion factors for gas to water with an amount of energy released through combustion.This only releases one millionth of the available energy that is in the gases. That is having their mass converted back to water. This is a chain reaction and is quickly shut down and reaches a stable state. The chemicals involved hydrogen and oxygen reach a stable state achieving mass conversion gas to water H2O. At this point the available mass to energy window is closed. By converting the gas back to water..This water should be then looked on as a waste product of the combustion event.. Step 4 What could be done to reduce this waste byproduct (water). In theory if you had a 100 percent conversion gas to explosive energy during the second conversion. You would not have any waste. All the gases would be burnt and there would be no byproduct water post combustion.. Step 5 How can this be done? How can we access this chain reaction event and improve its efficiency. If we could improve this mass conversion, just a fraction of a percent. This would vastly reduce the gas input needed. To attain the amount of energy required to run the engine..Less gas is what you will require as opposed to, insufficient gas is the problem. Note! Yes, correct Faraday electrolysis makes a gas that you can only access one millionth of its energy through combustion.… Step 6 How do we look at this inefficient combustion process and make improvements?.. (Chemical reactions!) Improving combustion to burn more of the available gases. This step is key! What is going on during the combustion moment? Ignition occurs.This sets off a chain reaction that will convert the gas mass back to a liquid mass.(Water). In turn with an amount of explosive energy. As we already know the explosive energy only accounts for one millionth of the possible available energy in the gas fuel. So how do we come up with a system to access more energy from the given amount of fuel? Step 7...Controlling the combustion event to access larger amounts of energy that are available.. This is done by controlling the combustion moment and extending the chemical reaction in a way to prolong energy release from the gas as it turns to water. One must note. Is a combustion engine not a pump. It creates a vacuum at the input manifold and creates a positive pressure at the exhaust manifold. Hydrogen and oxygen from water is the perfect fuel.Two parts Hydrogen to one part Oxygen.This is the perfect fuel to oxidiser ratio needing no other elements for combustion just fuel with oxidizer. To achieve control of the combustion event you have to control and minimise contamination from other elements. As said above hydrogen and oxygen is the perfect fuel to oxidiser mix. Something that is mostly unknown about is.The combustion engine can be fueled with hydrogen and oxygen and have the intake manifold completely sealed off. This creates a permanent vacuum in the intake manifold. With the hydrogen and oxygen being delivered into the engine manifold vacuum. An engine like this can be seen in demonstrations online videos.. So now we have hydrogen and oxygen and no other gases at the combustion event.This makes control of the event less complex. Step 8 How do we make a tool to act upon this simple chain reaction? Now we get into atoms and molecules. Is it not true an oxygen atom is 16 times the size of a hydrogen atom. In turn having 16 times the attraction force over an electron than the hydrogen atom. This my friends is your tool to affect the combustion event. Question is ? Can we prepare and add oxygen atoms in such a way to the combustion event to improve energy release by way of extending the chain reaction. Yes this can be done. First you have to have a way to remove electrons from the Oxygen Atom. Oxygen can be held in a stable state with up to 4 missing electrons by adding the correct light wavelength energy. Removing the electrons can be achieved with the use of a low pressure plasma reactor. A low pressure plasma reactor will act upon ambient air gases,oxygen,nitrogen,etc. In such a way to bring the constituents of air to what is called chemical resonance.Chemical resonance is a highly charged state whereby elements stop holding on to their electrons and electron sharing occurs. If you can take ambient air gases to chemical resonance. You are halfway to removing electrons from the oxygen atom. Step 9.Removing electrons from oxygen during chemical resonance. A plasma reactor consists of two stainless steel electrodes and quartz glass tube. The anode is positioned on the outside of the quartz. And the cathode is inside with a 1mm gap from the quartz. This gap is where the gases are worked upon. In the low pressure plasma zone. When in use this reactor has an amount of capacitance this is including the charged gases being held at chemical resonance.The gases become part of the reactor circuit capacitance.This capacitance could be considered to be like a single cell of a battery. It takes on capacitance and in turn can be discharged when the power input has stopped. When discharging the reactor's capacitance it is possible to reduce the mass of the plasma excited gases by way of discharging the reactor to a resistive load.. When reactor discharge is engaged the mass of the gases are reduced through a loss of electrons. Oxygen with up to four missing electrons is produced. These gases can be held in a stable state by way of red 660nM light. The low pressure is maintained in the reactor by the engine intake manifold vacuum. It is connected directly to the sealed off intake manifold. Step 10 How does mass reduced Oxygen atoms extend the opening of the chain reaction window during combustion. Well remember that the big oxygen atom has 16 times the attraction force compared to the Hydrogen Atom. This is where the Oxygen does work for you. When these processed Oxygen Atoms are added to electrolysis gases Hydrogen and Oxygen during the combustion window. They have such a large attraction force they will overcome the Hydrogens ability to hold on to its electron. And in so forces the Hydrogen to give up its mass to energy. This interaction during the combustion chain reaction causes more mass to be converted and opens the chain reaction window giving access to more than one millionth of the available gas energy. This in turn reduces the amount of byproduct,water in the exhaust.. By adjusting the mixture of fuel and processed gases. Mass reduced Oxygen. You can now vary not just the gas fuel input. But you can vary the amount of explosive energy per unit of gas fuel. Stanley Meyer used this method and perfected this fuel gas mix. He reduced the amount of electrolysis gas needed to very small amounts.The water fuel injector was the pinnacle of his achievement regarding using water as fuel.

[@NoOriginalContentOfficial]

Hope you made a working version

[@sos8992]

Go make one now Einstein

[@furbygarces6666]

Hope you make this brother

[@aguerra1381]

Water fuel injection, that was the key!

[@digilifestream]

mtttony is correct in his reply to this video, there is no way to make the excess energy appear in the form of excess hydrogen, you need to reverse where your heads are at, the energy comes from the correct burning ENVIRONMENT of the hydrogen and then the correct containment of the exhaust from said burn. that hydrogen oxidisation exhaust, is water and it is a liquid 1800 smaller that the volume of gasses burnt (propellent and oxidiser). combine what I'm telling you with what mtttony said, this is basically the answer to how stan made it work, the big secret. You don't need to modify the valve train, you do need to make a slight timing adjustment (just past TDC) and you need to inject the hydrogen at an unusual time (TDC between Exhaust and induction strokes) . You also need to ionise the intake manifold to make electron deficient oxygen (or OZONE) and use a second seperate ioniser to get more nitrogen from the air (charged Activated carbon) and add this nitrogen to the intake manifold to retard the burn, this is not that hard, easier than is sounds. In a four stroke, on pure hydrogen propellent, things are completely different, you can make other, different types of forces move the piston on the different strokes. NORMAL HYDROCARBON PROPELLENT FOUR STROKE 1 INDUCTION Stroke down 2 COMPRESSION stroke up 3 POWER Stroke DOWN 4 EXHAUST Stroke. up boring! STANS HYDROGEN PROPELLENT FOUR STROKE 1 BURN WHILE INDUCTING POWER Stroke.

[@freshimpactco.8698]

I believe he did indeed successfully created a way to split hydrogen and oxygen using only 0.5 amp. He used a way to fracture water, which may have meant his system relied on sound frequency and oscillation to achieve what was necessary to split h2o hydrogen and oxygen molecules apart.

[@MagnificentXXBastard]

complete nonsense. Besides, it wouldnt even matter. The minimum energy you need to put into a water molecule to split it is always the same, no matter the method used.

[@trungson6604]

To scientists and engineers, Stan Meyer's explanation on his "water fuel" was simply gob·ble·dy·gook...gibberish....totally without any scientific basis, intended to fool the non-scientific mass population. No one has been able to reproduce his claimed achievement. WATER is the end product of hydrogen combustion, therefore, water contains zero energy.

[@jamiesuzanne5781]

I think it absolutely DID work and he most CERTAINLY was murdered! In a world where money buys "answers" and has a level of corruption that is unimaginable to the common person.. I think they absolutely saw him and his invention as a threat and did what the powers that be always do... Eliminate obstacles ...

[@mikepoor6397]

That technology would’ve destroyed a lot of job/slavery positions( which equates to tax revenue), and big oil and big government wasn’t having it.

[@mukhumor]

The Pertochemical industry invested $millions to ensure that their oil burning engines would be the only means of propulsion for vehicles. Kill the competition.

[@yerbuddy5022]

Absolutely. The fossil fuel industry makes so much money, to the point that entire economies of some countries are almost based on them. It's just too lucrative of a business to have it shut down so suddenly. It would take decades to even come close to changing our dependency on it, no matter how great the demand for an alternative may be. And of course killing a person to keep that dependency alive would absolutely be, not only a possibility, But most likely a guarantee. In other words I too believe they killed him

[@yerbuddy5022]

It's almost naive to think otherwise

[@mukhumor]

@@yerbuddy5022 Can you imagine Pakistan, a developing economy with a population of 220,000,000 being forced to go electric by 2030? They get their goods to market by oil fueled trucks. Goods get to remote mountain communities on the back of trucks. There is no electric infrastructure, nor the money to finance it. Are we going to war to stop them using oil? How are they going to stop it? Saudi Arabia makes good money selling oil to Pakistan.... think they're going to stop that trade by 2030? With the best will in the world... it's not going to happen.

[@devilcwesker5980]

Well, as an electric engineer. I can say this powered car sounds pretty good to be true. Simply due to the fact that needing huge amounts of electricity volts to start the process of electrolysis would mean that the car itself would also have a battery (similar to a electric car) to store that electricity. The problem mean that this man would also need to invent the best car battery 🔋 as his battery would need not only store more electricity then batteries today and weight less. This is just not possible with the actual weight of the car. The man purposely made it light weight as other wise it wouldn't even move.

[@sniper5880]

You an engineer? Suuuure Mossad boy. Or you're a dummy that wears a mask

[@martelinaalmissa39]

car runs on hidrogen not electricity and batteries!!!

[@devilcwesker5980]

@@martelinaalmissa39 you would need electricity in order to start the hydrogen process and a battery in order to store electricity so you can keep the cycle of splitting hydrogen on going. Other wise you got a car that works the same way as a ratrapcar

[@Cybo-Man]

@@devilcwesker5980 It’s a retrofitted internal combustion engine. He explained the water injector that replaces the spark plug and the science behind it. This does not work the same way as an electric hydrogen engine.

[@Shwavybaby]

A guy did it

[@motherplantfarms3177]

We should not forget about Bob Lazar who also made a vehicle run specifically off hydrogen. His vehicle ran off 4 scuba tanks of hydrogen and was capable of going over 400 miles and was just as efficient if not more than gas. Stanley Meyer did successfully create a car that was able to run off water/hydrogen, he did have a demonstration of said vehicle that you can find on KZbin, same with Bob Lazar.

[@MagnificentXXBastard]

Hydrogen cars are comercially available already. Nothing Meyer or Lazar did was special or new.

[@davidfyzz6285]

@@MagnificentXXBastard if that's the case then point me in the direction of a country that mass produces these cars to the public you speak of?😂😂😂

[@MagnificentXXBastard]

@@davidfyzz6285 Hyundai & Toyota for example produce them

[@davidfyzz6285]

@@MagnificentXXBastard not in mass production to the public they don't 😂, you have zero evidence to back that claim up.

[@MagnificentXXBastard]

@@davidfyzz6285 1) I never said anything about "mass production", I just said "comercially available". 2) They are definitely not building them 1 by 1 by hand, but in a production line with machines. even though the numbers are roughly 16000 per year, this is still mass production imo. So I am right both ways. What even is your point youre trying to make?

[@johnprince8376]

I live in Indiana and I personally seen the car in person and I can attest it was real.

[@ethansweet8256]

Oh really?

[@asmodeus1234]

Please, go on, what did you actually witness the car doing?

[@NidokingOtsutsuki]

@@asmodeus1234 he saw a gas powered buggy driving down the road.

[@RuffhouseNC]

You are pulling our leg.

[@famaccount479]

Ofc was it real, there are video footages about it. Nobody claims that the car itself was not real. The engine he tried to sale was the fraud.

[@falaahblackwell1535]

That’s crazy because the security guard/ex cop that was murdered in the Buffalo mass shooting Arron Salter had completed that very same invitation, and was in the process of getting it patented.. He was driving his truck on water.. The sacrificed a few lives to get to Arron Salter

[@neilsanchez6933]

Holy shit you’re right

[@MagnificentXXBastard]

No one drives a truck with water. Water is a low energy state of hydrogen and oxygen. You need to put energy in to separate it. You don't get energy OUT of it.

[@David-bg9od]

Arron "water powered" truck wasn't special. He used electrolysis like every other car. And electrolysis consumes more energy than it creates.

[@GPRaitsakas]

@@David-bg9od This is the first logical statement on this nonsense about water driven engines.

[@Emberixz]

Stanley Meyer was an American inventor and engineer who claimed to have developed a water-fueled car, which he said could run on water alone as a fuel source. He also claimed to have developed a "water fuel cell" that would allow for the efficient electrolysis of water, creating hydrogen and oxygen gas to be used as fuel. Meyer's claims were met with skepticism by the scientific community, and he faced legal trouble and financial difficulties throughout his career. He filed for multiple patents related to his water-fueled car and fuel cell, but none were granted. In addition, he was also involved in several legal disputes, including lawsuits with investors and business partners. In 1996, Meyer was arrested and charged with fraud for selling plans and devices related to his water-fueled car, which the prosecution argued did not work as advertised. He was acquitted of these charges in 1997, but many experts and investigators believe that he defrauded investors and clients out of thousands of dollars. Meyer died in 1998 under mysterious circumstances. Some people claim that he was poisoned by the government or oil companies because of his invention, but there is no evidence to support these claims. His death was determined as a result of a brain aneurysm. After his death, many experts and organizations have attempted to replicate Meyer's inventions and claims, but none have been successful. The scientific community widely considers his ideas and inventions to be impossible based on the laws of thermodynamics. The laws of thermodynamics dictate the energy conservation laws and the efficiency of energy conversion, and hydrogen production via water electrolysis requires more energy input than the energy obtained when burning the hydrogen. It's worth noting that some people continue to assert that Meyer's inventions and ideas are valid, despite the lack of scientific evidence to support these claims. However, based on the information that is currently available, it seems that Stanley Meyer's claims of a water-fueled car and a water-fuel cell were unfounded, and that he may have engaged in fraudulent activities. His inventions are now widely considered as pseudoscience.

[@SenjusS-zw8hw]

❤ what was his back ground before this said invention ? 2) If it was worthy, then a man of that stature fooled a invester? ( Probability for this?) 3) An invester invested huge amount without solid proof? My views are from my curiosity to know ❤

[@satino8082]

My dad is a mechanic that has worked on vehicles his whole life and he recently told me that he once made his vehicle water powered when I told him about this video😮. He said he still has the kit and can put it on his vehicle anytime

[@wr8196]

Source: trust me bro

[@ronneylyons859]

What kit manufacturer?

[@Mochi-lf5rz]

Ah yes ur dad has a Billion dollar invention collecting dust in his basement

[@janpietersalome1685]

With today's gas prices I find it strange that he didn't do it. Maybe do another reality check ?

[@isaiahstarkey3723]

Watch stan meyer explains water fuel technology its 37 minutes it worked great and produced significant more power than gasoline and ran so clean you never had to even change the oil and explains how the model that would have come to market would have been 1500 dollars

[@markbutton2119]

🧢

[@MPS2726]

He stupid. They killed him for it and this clown says it didn't work. Hater cause he didn't do it.

[@isaiahstarkey3723]

@@MPS2726 the technology used that stan invented separated hydrogen from water then ran off of the hydrogen

[@AJSSPACEPLACE]

@@MPS2726 yes. He was murdered over a scientific concept that he in no way invented, or improved. No other scientist is working on electrolysis. It hasn’t been made into a more efficient process in the slightest. The thousands of independent scientists working in their garages and basements are all too stupid to reinvent this.

[@dpolanco96]

@@MPS2726 lol if there’s a possibility then there’s a motive to kill him. Just a possibility can change the game 👌🏽

[@hitokiridm]

I'm a BSIT Automotive Mechanic and I know about this stuff. Here in the Philippines there was a TV Educational series and talked about this stuff and I was fascinated by it. It's true and it does work. However I don't see as much as these cars powered by water, maybe because most of people used gas or diesels. It's not rocket science to know that these cars can be so high in demand because it used water as source. Maybe that's why the people who killed Stan are the people who are afraid of his breakthrough, actually there are four people discovered the same thing. This makes me feel that I can't trust the industries or the government.

[@ericadams1849]

Exactly

[@mitchellambro4347]

People don’t understand the power of vibrations, music and the synchronization of elements and the wavelengths at which excite the elements. His patents detail this. Mitch Ambro.

[@williammount213]

In 1944-45 Captain Charles Bishop (my best friend's father) was a navigator on B-29's. He flew with water powered P-51's, not water injected. Ambassador Mount

[@famaccount479]

Maybe you mean water cooled.

[@awesome3769]

We have water-based fuels for energy and fuel, but despite these findings, governments in developed countries are not turning to the table.

[@ramsaybolton9151]

Becauae gas literally controls all world economies

[@notribadsvault]

And governments in the undeveloped world are?

[@davidgill3356]

@@ramsaybolton9151 Wow, you are everywhere. No, no it doesn’t. Oil doesn’t. Tell it to Japan, Germany and so on. There might actually be something wrong with you. Every….single….thing you say is objectively wrong and yet you feel completely comfortable making an ass out of yourself.

[@peterhawryluk8430]

At least his idea wasn't killed off. His work is out there and I've seen it work. I was amazed and angered about the other chemicals are so impossible to get. If you know the secret it will piss you off too.

[@ramsaybolton9151]

" you could make a dirty bomb!"

[@chrislackey2170]

great video , it's kinda hard to find good info on this topic but you nailed it

[@bertinorm1574]

Those involved in his death will receive harsh karma. Justice for Mr. Meyer.

[@coreylew2835]

not in this life but possibly in the afterlife for sure

[@thedoberman9458]

@@coreylew2835 yeah

[@Shake_Well_Before_Use]

@@coreylew2835 true

[@JakeVS2011]

Karma is not enough

[@BlackHasAH2R]

@@JakeVS2011 damn you want the grim reaper?

[@shaneness6885]

I’m not a physicist, but even with a basic understanding of thermodynamics a few things should be clear: 1. This can be done but economically it doesn’t make sense. The cost of one kg of hydrogen is now around 6 dollars when production is scaled. The cost at the pump for gas in Seattle is now over 6 bucks. The cost to PRODUCE that fuel is a fraction of the cost to produce one kg of hydrogen. 2. The energy in one kg of hydrogen is about the same as a gallon of fuel to be clear. 3. We should derive our energy for mass consumption by utilizing the fewest number of state changes possible. For example, using diesel equipment to mine lithium, to power a Tesla that derives the energy from a coal fired grid is still not “green” but might actually be the most efficient use of energy with current technology. Coal when used on a scaled model isn’t evil. 4. That brings me to my conclusion on why this engine isn’t viable. It’s not scalable at a cost the average person can afford. It’s a miniature hydrolysis plant that cannot compete with gasoline. It’s also inefficient. It’s using a battery that was powered by a primary energy source to convert water into another energy source which means heat is generated with each conversion which is a loss of efficiency. 5. Said differently, this engine is inefficient and expensive compared to current technology.

[@jesuss392]

Imagine how better the world would be rn

[@SlashinatorZ]

Yep but the capitalists won't allow this

[@TheFracturedfuture]

Imagine how much better the world would ve if the government didn't kill people who made inventions that would better humanity.

[@tarotlumination4122]

I used to build kilns by hand for the ceramic pottery craft people. I used oil-based burners with blower fans to create an injection system very similar to fuel injection on modern cars. I inserted steel plates in the path of the burning flame and when the steel plates reached red hot or white hot color I added water through a tiny nozzle. The water instantly fractured into hydrogen and oxygen which both translated into fuel. The effect was so powerful that several of my kilns exploded from The increased pressure. I was not smart enough and I was too frightened to continue my Enterprise. I guarantee the hydrogen/water fuel system works.

[@thedubwhisperer2157]

Steel is molten when white hot. Try making up another story dude - and use a bit of science this time...

[@ronbishop4057]

@@thedubwhisperer2157 Oh, shut up you fool. Tarot may have achieved that split but the energy needed to heat those plates will always be greater than the energy produced.

[@fanbutton]

We live in a very, very evil world, ran mostly by wicked people so, it's highly likely he was done in.

[@Sabrinaxoxo92]

Yes people say go to hell. Ummm we’re in hell already.

[@vaguepepper4028]

There is almost a 0% chance he was killed over this. Perpetual motion isn't possible and no one would take his invention seriously.

[@artsafact_official]

This is why you teach people what you know

[@David-bg9od]

The patent is expired and you can build one on your own

[@halfmoonbardo550]

Thanks for video OP! Super interesting & well done 👏🏽👍🏽🙏🏽

[@ChrisVSCars]

Thanks 😁.. im glad you enjoyed it😂 Some people really didnt like it

[@emmyblue30]

@@ChrisVSCars People don’t like being faced with an uncomfortable truth.

[@LukePappa]

200,000 patents? If he submitted a patent a day, it would take him 548 years to submit all of them. And most of them were accepted? And ahead of their time? And he invented a vehicle that ran on water? Nobody is stupid enough to believe that.

[@Doubletme]

I never took this in but it is strange. A person would have to submit approx 5 patents a day from the day they were born until they died at 90 years old to acomplish 200k patents🤔

[@dusaanna9458]

Well, on "before its news" website, about ten years ago there was a mysterious post by a man pretending he maintained kind of secret anti-gravity flying machines. He described how a device worked to create anti-gravity (I found a flaw there). However, the main power of the craft was produced by a kind of thunderstorm engine with two horizontal pistons with water (the sole and only fuel) injected. Then by reciprocating pistons movement, the water was compressed in the chamber with no air intake (at the diesel engine compression pressure reached about 14 bars) At that time a high voltage ignition spark was fired inside the horizontal compressed chamber with the water horizontally in it High voltage spark propagate very well trough water and cause it to explode in vapor . So the spark caused the state of water to modify from liquid into a gas of about 225 bars (like diesel oil burned in a piston) but with a high temperature (called critical state) which pushed the piston back. So was the two pistons engine working and called it a "thunderstorm engine" with reciprocating pistons. At the exhaust there was water plus ozone ; I believed at that time that this was a joke. I just saw that this was patented recently in Germany (prof. Diplom engineer Konstantin MEYL 2021) The patenter know and understand matter and electro-magnetism far better than many physicists (he studied the electric arcs and the EDDY currents in particular) and he claims that a heavy duty diesel engine can be converted to water if equipped with timed high voltage ignition system like liquid gas engine have. His patent authorize personal use. Personally I fear that corrosion and friction would be a problem for a classic Diesel engine, anyway everybody know that the steam engine corrosion and friction problems were technologically solved a long time ago. Give it a try?

[@TheFracturedfuture]

Maybe an anti corrosive could be added to it, kinda like antifreeze.

[@AliyahandMommyLDR]

Very interesting video. New friend here. Hope to see you around. Keep sharing

[@ChrisVSCars]

Thanks alot😌

[@alhashemi8351]

I respect the fact you mentioned that you're not the smartest and you have basic knowledge of the matter. But that's precisely why he's a genius and we are not. Just because we can't wrap our minds around it; that doesn't mean someone else can't.. And yes, the oil industry will go bankrupt and there won't be a necessary claim for Iraq WMD and the distraction of Ieaq. "USA NEED TO PAY FOR WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE EAST UP UNTIL TODAY" Just look at what's happening in Yemen and they'll turn Ukraine to another Middle East.

[@kareklopodaros]

Ok, so who can prove it doesn't work?

[@alhashemi8351]

@@kareklopodaros I'm sorry all I found is a video in Portuguese. The technology is available and in 6 to 8 different countries, but multi billion dollar oil corporations will simply not allow this to pass without a fight! Check this link out, it's self explanatory unless otherwise you seek details, then ask a friend who speaks Portuguese! kzbin.info/www/bejne/pWbaZJxvhb17Z8k

[@notribadsvault]

@@kareklopodaros Dude what are you going on about? What does Ukraine have to do with water powered cars? And how is Ukraine like Yemen? And how is it the US turning Ukraine into Yemen when it’s the Russians invading? And why doesn’t China or Russia make water powered engines, while we’re at it?

[@kareklopodaros]

@@notribadsvault not me brother. You wanted to reply at the guy that made the comment.

[@williammount213]

A FRIEND'S FATHER (PAUL RUSSOM) CONVERTED HIS 1972 CHEVY 350 INTO A WATER POWERED CAR & DROVE FROM POULSBO WASHINGTON TO PHOENIX ARIZONA ON 1 1/2 QUARTES OF WATER. Ambassador Mount

[@chris01479]

Wow!! That's awesome. Does he ran 300 to 400 mpg? Does he still running hydrogen on his car right now? Does he use VIC? I'm really interested to know.

[@GuyWithHatandSunglasses]

These electric and oil related businessmen did the most disgusting thing they could ever do. I don't think business is lesser dirty than politics

[@matthawksworth]

The technology that is possible would put the living standards of all people into abundance.

[@timewalker6654]

There is hardly any molecule more stable than water and co2. so where would the energy come from? its such a simple concept.

[@TerriTheTerribleTheOriginal]

We're only here because We've seen a KZbin short about this guy.

[@Danilio.]

Lmao facts, but this video was extremely interesting I will say

[@NezarecFGOP]

This would benefit everyone and even the environment except big oil companies. He was with 2 Belgian investors and his brother, of course the investors would want this to not get out as they would lose money on the car and oil companies they already invested in. -Sheep with internet

[@HowsYourFaceFeel]

The “sheep” in this instance would be the ones believing he wasnt poisoned.

[@AJSSPACEPLACE]

Why wouldn’t an oil company back renewable energy. I mean. Really think about this for a moment. The first company to make oil obsolete, will instantly be able to completely destroy any and all competitors. A global monopoly would be 100% guaranteed, and the corporation responsible would be unstoppable. What greedy company wouldn’t want that?

[@fckmunch]

@@AJSSPACEPLACE the green movement are the oil dudes. It's not about free energy, rather power and control. And money has nothing to do with it as they already control the printing press'. A monopoly already exists.

[@dominickjustave3558]

Bs

[@anthonyberger810]

@@AJSSPACEPLACE renewable energy innovation means nothing when corporate oil lobbyists ensure that noting can possibly change. The US is NOT a capitalist state. In a capitalist state, the scenario you describe would absolutely come to fruition. We however live in a lobbyist state. Currently, money is considered free speech. Yes. Bribery is completely legal. All vehicles require approval from the NHTSA, which is practically owned by big oil. Corruption is the true enemy of the US, and humanity at large. Corruption is single-handedly responsible for keeping us hooked on outdated fossil fuel.

[@austing.6483]

awesome content bro, keep it up, look forward to seeing more👍🏼

[@ChrisVSCars]

Thanks man😁😁

[@Tengooda]

c. 10:07 "Anything is possible". No, anything is not possible. And one of those impossible things is to run a car with water as the fuel. Electrolysis of water to obtain hydrogen takes more energy than is obtained in burning the hydrogen thus produced. It is as simple and undeniable as that. The irony is that fossil fuel companies have actually committed a far greater crime than the killing just one man: they have produced a whole industry that promotes doubt and misinformation about science in general and climate science in particular, which goes a long way in explaining why so many people are now climate science deniers and sceptical about science in general. That ignorance and climate science denial will results not just in one death, but in countless suffering, destruction of livelihoods and millions of human deaths, along with the destruction of much of the natural world. That, in terms of its potential result, could be said to be the greatest crime in the history of humanity. The conspiracy theories around Stanley Meyer's death is just an irrelevant distraction from the reality of what the fossil fuel companies have actually done.

[@darklight2.1]

Well put.

[@James-hu3mu]

If you have H2O and 02... You then have put them together as one.. when you burn them, they essentially become at a boil point and have steam (evaporation), in witch it can evaporate into the cilinder expansion and expand the hypertension. Although, if you would do this without enough tubular push powers, it would for sure back up and become stagnant. Absolutely amazing in the eyes of us motor heads.. Long live the legend.

[@SG-ds8pr]

This was the most scientifically illiterate comment I’ve ever read. None of that is even remotely accurate.

[@madyak222]

The issue that Meyer was "Just using hydrolosis to create hydrogen and it was nothing new is ignorant" meyer was obviously a genius who made a Highly efficient Hydrogen splitter. which could be more than achieved today due to the facts that our lectronics and batteries are far superior to the 1970's. There is an Iranian scientist who has also created a highly efficient hydrogen splitter and drives his volvo around on water. I believe water is a viable energy source, the problem with commercial Hydrogen today is that it's largely made from natural gas, has to be super cooled and compressed which is costly, leads to pipe and vessel breakdown. making hydrogen infrastructure costly and unsustainable. Hydrogen also burns at a very high heat, which leads to engine deformation, if high temp metals aren't used, such as titanium. Splitting hydrogen from water is so much better than creating hydrogen from Natural gas, a plastic fuel tank wouldn't corrode, no high pressure or super cooling. Hydrogen is far more powerful than petrol or diesel, but engines would initially cost more so the advance of EV's will continue. Hydrogen from water should be the only way that boats and ships are fuelled, cars should have that option if we can have super efficient hydrogen splitters for sale on Amazon and Ebay as well as all our local auto stores.

[@GemstoneActual]

Water FRACTURING, NOT electrolysis.

[@colehogeland4049]

What is wayer fracturing

[@GemstoneActual]

@@colehogeland4049 Stimulating the H2O molecule, at approximately 20kHz, to spin itself apart. The tricks are: small gaps between conductors, and very thin layers of dielectric. Meyer did this with SS tubing.

[@massinaballah5536]

They will never tell us they killed him because of his invention. But if he ever invented a water power car, then they killed him

[@devante1992]

I’ve been searching and i cant find anything about what happened to the buggy after he died

[@3094usmc]

Because this was all bullshit

[@jayjunker4689]

When they poisoned him as he was being transported to the hospital his garage door was smashed and his car and equipment was stolen, at the exact same time he was poisioned

[@devante1992]

@@jayjunker4689 oh shit

[@jayjunker4689]

If you think any part of this story is bullshit then you are so wrong or your stupid or uneducated. His car and invention worked flawlessly. It use to be taught in school as a junior high school science project, on a much lower level. Stanley Myers saw what potentional it could be and by himself proved it works all because he loved Americans and didn't want us to have to suffer through another oil embargo like the one Saudi Arabia pulled on us in 1976. They offered him 1 billion dollars cash for his invention he refused cause he wouldn't sell out his fellow americans like so many do all the time. He was murdered less than a year later. Stanley Meyers is one of my most respected heros. He is one of the greatest men I can think of. And his invention worked just as he said cause I have made one just as he explained it and by god it worked. Thank you for your contribution Stanley Meyers we need more like him and all our world problems would be solved. Totally respect to him and his beautiful family. I'm so sorry for what our piece of shit country has done to all of you and all of humanity

[@mordecaiesther3591]

Same as Tesla … once Tesla died the FBI smashed in and took all his notes .

[@carlvu7]

Layman question: Does the energy release from a hydrogen bomb be controlled to run a smaller vehicle? Is it the same type of chemical reaction? How does the Toyota hydrogen car work?

[@johnsonhunglo1993]

The oil industry really, really wanted to sponsor him!!! He was a modern-day Tesla!!!

[@NidokingOtsutsuki]

just like Tesla, a smart dude that went insane and scammed everyone.

[@NidokingOtsutsuki]

just like Tesla, a smart dude that went insane and scammed everyone.

[@johnsonhunglo1993]

@@NidokingOtsutsuki: Tesla never 'scammed' anyone!!! Hell, he went broke giving away his inventions!!! The US is still in possession of tons of his paperwork!!! The US media, in their role fronting for the government, has implied that recent technological advances are derived from 'alien contacts'. I suggest that they come from Nicola!!!!

[@williammclaughlin452]

In 1978 my mom bought a BRAND NEW CHRYSLER WITH A V8 never took it on anything just local driving only after a couple months I ask her how it was on gas she said she had NOR put any in it since she filled it up when she bought it Thanks to dad she was a fanatic about checking oil she called me one day after having it for 3months and said it was leaking oil so I checked it for her and it was nothing to worry about she insisted on Taki g it back to the dealer to have them check it , they ask her how it was running she said fine they ask her how was her fuel milage she told the she had not put any in it since she filled it after buying it , turns out it was getting over 20 mpg they looked surprised and said they would see if they could fix the oil leak turns out that her car had an experimental carb on it that shouldn't have on it when she got it back 4 days later she said it just didn't run the same , well gee I wonder why the technology is there but big oil doesn't want it out there that's why I belive Stanley was was poisoned

[@mosconi0359]

I think Stanley died, but his car did not. Just like they did an autopsy on him, anyone with any type of electrical engineering background could have easily done an autopsy on his car and determined if it was "real" or "fraudulent." If no such analysis was ever done for whatever reason, chances are good the car was fake. It makes a better story to say his secret died "with him" but of course it did not. Whatever mechanical method he used to make his buggy "Go" could easily be reverse engineered after his death. Why wasn't it? And, if it was, where are the results of such an endeavor? If his family, such as the brother, would not allow it, that is a big red flag indicating possible fraud. After all, Stanley didn't build the space shuttle, he built a simple dune buggy that supposedly ran on hydrogen. I am sure the technology to "validate" his claims existed at the time of his death and still do today, yet nobody talks about his car after he dies. I'm skeptical to say the least.

[@Palmotron]

Such matters are the norm corporations and billionaires fight for their own, so no wonder there are suspicions of his death. When in the mid-90s a Polish designer presented a revolutionary energy-absorbing bumper, it seemed that a revolution in the automotive industry awaited us. However, nothing of the sort happened, and now the Pole has to fight for recognition of the rights to his own invention. There are probably such stories in every country and some of them are true

[@reddlion]

Reality check! If he drove it around the country on water, showed other engineers who then agreed it works on water, proves through patent office that it runs on water then it was true and he was removed purposely.

[@JesseSwaney]

"At least as far back as 1980, Stanley Meyer claimed that he had built a dune buggy that ran on water, although he gave inconsistent explanations as to its mode of operation. In some cases, he claimed that he had replaced the spark plugs with a "water splitter", while in other cases it was claimed to rely on a "fuel cell" that split the water into hydrogen and oxygen. The "fuel cell", which he claimed was subjected to an electrical resonance, would split the water mist into hydrogen and oxygen gas, which would then be combusted back into water vapour in a conventional internal combustion engine to produce net energy. Meyer's claims were never independently verified, and in an Ohio court in 1996 he was found guilty of "gross and egregious fraud". He died of an aneurysm in 1998, although conspiracy theories claim that he was poisoned."

[@Lightning_aus]

bruh imagine copying a wikipedia article

[@JesseSwaney]

@@Lightning_aus Imagine liking your own comment.

[@Lightning_aus]

@@JesseSwaney bet i didnt

[@JesseSwaney]

@@belliduradespicio8009 What exactly is the point!?

[@JesseSwaney]

@@belliduradespicio8009 So you're saying that an Ohio court didn't find him guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" because it's also documented on Wikipedia?

[@johan8724]

That man in Holland was called Johannes Wardenier lived from 1912 til 1960, died under misterical circumstances

[@bamlook2640]

Judging by the type of things that this guy worked on I believe he invented it. And this is how I think it worked. A very small portion of gas fluid or hydrogen fluid was mixed with the water and that was enough with his engine designed to make it work. 💡😊

[@DIYTFY]

False.

[@quantum_chezburger2279]

@Slit 444 by lies.

[@jakethepup9694]

atomized hydrogen and oxygen is how it works. scientist said it was impossible and Stan and his brother proved the scientist were wrong. Stan's invention was proven not to work by 3 witnesses that were paid to say it didn't work. Oil companies would lose way to much for it to be proven that it worked. Stan was a genious and others have done what Stan did and were silenced by cash,threats or death like Stan. RIP Stan

[@bamlook2640]

@@jakethepup9694 I believe everything you said 100%.

[@MagnificentXXBastard]

@@jakethepup9694 You know nothing about chemistry. How do you separate water and get more energy out by fusing it again than you put in separating it? Basic conservation of energy.

[@AzadShadad]

His truth stays with him and god. But one Thing For Sure is that many people know is when scary rich people Reach their hands For murder ITS hard to seperate From Natural death causes, Like how He seperated H2O.

[@darklight2.1]

We "separated" H2O in my high school chemistry class 45 years ago-it's called electrolysis and the process was discovered over two hundred years ago. His "truth" led to his conviction for lying to and defrauding his investors. People deserve a better class of hero than this two-bit grifter.

[@dpolanco96]

He should’ve took that cranberry juice with him and took it to a lab.

[@clewis408]

Maybe not him because he died shortly after but his brother for sure

[@MadSceintist]

You are correct, you are not very smart. This is absolutely valid. I spent 2 years going through Stanley Meyers research and found the points where he changed his path and where the perfection of the process is. I've drive 2 vehicles on this exact process. Easy, cheap, direct replacement with minor alterations to any combustion engine. 300 miles per 1 litre of tap water.

[@Hypersonicmind]

This is not "splitting atoms" It is "splitting molecules"

[@vicshephard9231]

Lol I don't believe we want an engine that splits atoms.

[@markhughes7927]

8:59 Sounds like his car was the ultimate exemplar for perfecting efficiency in the Work:Heat:Pressure relation known as the ‘Carnot Cycle’ - the electrical power source for the fuel cell being returned through brake dynamos and also downhill motion activating a variable weight fly-wheel which also re-charged the battery by use of a dynamo. The variable weight of the fly-wheel being made possible by the injection and extraction of water into such circular motion as was appropriate to conditions. Such an arrangement may even have made it possible to achieve up-hill gradients mechanically with small electrical assistance. Also electrical top ups would be available from ambient planetary energy sources such as solar. Practically all that would be needed would be to start it up and then let it participate in the perpetual energetic motion of Cosmic Nature.

[@gavblack1081]

Where is the car now?

[@chandlerstovall]

Probably in Area 51 🤣

[@alanstephens5883]

@@chandlerstovall facts lmao

[@MrOffroadjunkie]

Destroyed

[@Vintageshutters]

LMAO you know it’s destroyed. All the oil leaders smashed it like in office space when they beat the hell out of fax machine

[@chris01479]

I was told by someone who know his brother, his brother has his buggy and he still couldn't find out how he have done it.

[@no-qs6xi]

It's like submarines using sea water; however, it's Not Allowed to be used any other way .

[@no-qs6xi]

Still looking for Documentary about Meyer's; it's not where I found It before. FYI

[@thomaskishmanii2675]

Just because someone testifies in court doesn’t mean the outcome of it’s true. Think about it if the water powered car was truth and your life as at risk by saying yes it works most people would testify the opposite. Interesting video.

[@olsonspeed]

Toyota recently announced they are close to perfecting a 3-cyl "water engine", I wish them sucess, the world needs this tech.

[@ThouArtOfWar0724]

In all the years passed someone could have easily figured out how to recreate this car. So I'm not sure this was ever realistic especially in that time.

[@Sanket.vjadhav]

He was the "free energy" guy 2 decades ago 😂

[@circle7489]

@@Sanket.vjadhav there have been plenty of examples of people doing this since the 1900s, a lot of examples of claiming to have a revelation in energy production including Nikolas Tesla, its a big rabbit hole conspiracy of free energy suppression

[@OnettBoyXD]

His invention was already patented by oil companies. They were already aware of the tech before Meyer ever created his machine.

[@beautifulbeaner]

Because it ran on lies not on water

[@thepinkashow9909]

its not that they don't want to its like they can't

[@gregolsen7102]

A description of the actual operation of the engine brought in aspects of Tesla's work which makes it highly likely it worked but will not be allowed until free energy is officially allowed! :-)

[@stevelindsay3643]

Of course, it worked. I have numerous HHO Fuel Cells I've made for various reasons. HHO Water Torch, HHO Fuel Cell for Lawntractors, HHO Fuel Cells for experimentation on voltage and current, and yes HHO Fuel Cells For Automobiles... I don't know how many I've built over the years. Stan went a few steps further in his setup. There's no doubt it worked incredibly well and was super efficient.

[@uku4171]

Proof?

[@kaniuoh911]

@@uku4171 my basement

[@uku4171]

@@kaniuoh911 so, none?

[@kaniuoh911]

@@uku4171 come and see

[@uku4171]

@@kaniuoh911 or you could do a video. That's only if it was real, though.

[@isaiahtheanimeostcollector6682]

Good video dude very informative

[@ChrisVSCars]

In this video I mentioned that he filed for 200k patents. I do think that this is a mistake. One of my sources must have made a mistake, I think the truth is closer to 20 or so.

[@ReplayJay]

Whoops!

[@marcinurban3197]

that is mistake for sure - 200k is inpossible in human life - for 20 years he would be filing 26 patents daily ; ) - e v e r y d a y

[@somekindofmonster3613]

Tell me if Im wrong but If you have a 50 liter tank full of water you get aproximately 25 liter hydrogen. Meanwhile current cars have Hydrogen tanks that is 50 liter. So doing electrolysis on board is not efficient as having the hydrogen alone because you have to carry more payload for less output

[@pkillor]

The electrolysis uses direct current D.C. and needs some salts or acids to make the water conductive (you turn it into a resistance) for that reason it is not very efficient, because part of the energy is transformed into heat in the water. MEYER did the opposite, use A.C. ALTERNATIVE electricity. and the DIELECTRIC property of WATER (it does not conduct electricity well) to create a capacitor made with water as dielectric. and then he connected it to a resonant circuit (amplifier) and set the optimum frequency for power transfer. This way it minimizes the expenditure of electricity to break the water bond.

[@stephb5098]

Then why is nobody using his technology today to create H2 and O2. These gas are good valuable commodities now, and are still very expensive; take H2, it is around 2.5 euro/liter in liquid state and O2 sell even more. If he really had a good way to crack water with very low energy input to create massive amount of H2 and O2 worth more, his invention would be used by many now, since his patent is free to all (only last 10 years). You are so smart at explaining it, you should be in business

[@pkillor]

@@stephb5098 I think you raise a question that gets ahead of itself, others that need to be asked first. The price, although it is necessary to answer it, I think the first thing to do is to see if it can be done. If it is technically possible or not? Once answered, or solved the main answer, it is necessary to move on to different phases of how to make it more efficient, etc... And maybe the last question will be to specify the price... Well, to my understanding the price is very relative and can even be manipulated it can be manipulated, as it is happening with other types of energies already established. Greetings PS: And I don't have any hydrogen lobby or anything like that, I'm just driven by the desire to have more knowledge of how things work.

[@Bassotronics]

Any gasoline powered engine can run on water. All you need to do is take the spark plug electricity and boost it up to 20,000 volts and 50 amperes. Watch that water explode instantly and cause the piston to move.

[@jacktherip7750]

It looks like a troll comment but you're actually telling the truth

[@jaradz]

How long personal data are stored Vital Foundation does not store your personal data longer than is strictly necessary to achieve the goals for which your data is gathered.

[@The_ScIgacz15]

Good video Bro. Where is Meyer's car now?🤔

[@juliehambrook4006]

There was no oil shortage. The USA has massive reserves today.

[@novalover5033]

Oil regenerates. & technically we have just as much oil as we do water. They don't want the general public to know that. These shortages were bald faced grade A bullshit lies.

[@juliehambrook4006]

@@novalover5033 correct

[@juliehambrook4006]

@ClozedCaskets! always thought the blow out at the BP ocean rig was Halliburton.

[@TravisTellsTruths]

It's funny you made this video but didn't research his lectures on how it actually worked. I'm glad you speak about him though.

[@traedae3136]

I believe it work why else would they kill him so common sense

[@Danilio.]

Not to mention his lab was also raided in after he died, all his research & technology + the car was stolen and was either sold off to others or destroyed which is what I believe most likely happened.

[@Danilio.]

Such as shame we live in a world of greediness & selfishness

[@timjonson5763]

Nobody can replicate his system, just theory, theory and theory.

[@codizalkoosh7728]

4:30 "if it rained you could go to work for free" dude you wouldnt need to work anymore.... lol the only work that would need to be developed would be hydrogen powered machines to produce fruits and vegitables.

[@TheTruth1sPower]

Theyll try to play it off as a coincidence that he died. Dont let them win.

[@John52416]

Do you have any links for the court docs?

[@jimciancio9005]

Unless Stan found something that was detrimental to the Dirty Carbon Cartel like some other sort of splitter for water which may use an electrochemical reaction rather than just plain eltrolisis. 🤔 This is the question that has the answer inside the fact, weather or not there is basis for murder here. If he had some sort of technology that could possibly do this efficiently and the Cartel found this out of course their first question is Stan would be "How much" and we'll never hear of this invention again as they would bury it for as long as humanly possible to keep selling oil and coal! And if his answer was no sale for his technology, then now this opens up the case for motive rather burying the technology before it gets a chance to go public to denounce and mock it to destroy reputations and possible investor backing on any further related research and development. Ok now I understand there is a lot of credit given here, but this is exactly how these people play and how they've maintained their extraordinary lifestyles of the rich and infamous. Through threats lies and deceitful actions against any sort of competition in their game! It's disgusting how it's been going on for so long now and it's only growing to many other industries as well. Politician's take the bribes and make sure nothing legal or big government does contribute to any successes as big business threats and sues people into handing over their inventions or ideas. If all else fails and the prior didn't stop the problem facing these cartels then why wouldn't they resort to violence and making it appear as an accident or natural death so that way mainstream isn't likely to ask too many questions about the cause of death and public outrage is seemed to its minimum. He very well could have hit upon something that no one else knew about and because he wasn't willing to negotiate "His Own Price" they'd have no real options left but to get him out of the way and destroy his reputation for his work or invention. So is it possible 🤔 Absolutely 💯 % possible 🤔 Do I personally think this is exactly true, we'll saying one way or the other is highy ignorant and shows bias against oil and government. Unless something comes up in the future pointing out that he was onto something dangerous to the oil cartels and or a whistle blower comes out with evidence of this having any truth to it???? SMFH well only time may tell, we cannot do anything but make assumptions about theories here.

[@ziongite]

One thing is true, if the government finds a random citizen who seems to have invented something that could have meaningful military application, it's most likely that the government would kill this person and steal their work, this makes sure that the work wouldn't become public or fall into the hands of other nations, and that it could become protected information only within the defence agency of the government. I am not saying this was the case with Stanley Meyer necessarily, but it certainly has been the case for some people in history obviously.

[@honda4004]

many more have tripped upon the vander vault forces that can be extracted from natural air to run engines by static (lightning and vibrational thunder collapse ) so electro static /lightning magnetic static /the thunder ) in perpetual motion once excited

[@srahhh]

He didn't show his car to Professor Laughton, and Professor Laughton did not think it was amazing. "His car was due to be examined by the expert witness Michael Laughton, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed."

[@fazonio]

The Buffalo shooting got me here. Ex-cop who was killed patented another water powered engine.

[@Bluuplanet]

Everyone *says* Stanley's car utilized electrolisys, but watching a video where he explains how his his car works, I got the impression he somehow did an end-run around traditional electrolisys. He also had some sort of laser module that was about 2" thick between the distributor base and the distributor cap that simply produced a signal sent to the car's computer. You certainly dont need a laser to do that. The location of that component suggests it's being used to retard/advance or condition the spark somehow, but he doesnt say that.

[@dolphin8815]

Im here from PKA clips.

[@emmyblue30]

What is PKA?

[@dolphin8815]

@@emmyblue30 id say give it a goog but i like em alot and more awareness for them. Pain Killer Already. Featuring Woodys gamertag FPS Kyle (FPS russia) And Taylor (merkia) //excuse my spelling errors.

[@hasselhoffff]

Damn, suddenly all the professional scientists are upon the comment section.

[@patmcintyre8421]

His Electrolysis Cell was of a High Frequency and efficient Patented design together with his injectors and mods to his car & engine which made it a totally different system to whatever people think of when considering a basic way to run the car this way!

[@garfield5647]

is the patent posted anywhere?

[@ChrisVSCars]

Jup

[@famaccount479]

So you want to tell us that you believe he can generate MORE energy out of it as he has to put into. Aka create a perpetuum mobile and break all laws of therodynamic. Seriously?

[@marinadizon2720]

@@garfield5647 Yes. Found a dozen patents in 5 seconds with search terms - stan meyer patent water car

[@marinadizon2720]

@@famaccount479 Study Modern Thermodynamics by Prigogine. Specifically page 459.

[@MadBiker-vj5qj]

People are commenting that Meyer's electrolytic splitter was over 100% efficient because it operates at the resonant frequency of water. This is completely false, it's operational frequency was several orders of magnitude lower than the resonant frequency of water.

[@DoseOfVirality]

You seriously don't think that an alternator could produce enough energy "efficiently" enough to perform electrolysis? Come on dude... as long as the battery could Jumpstart the process the alternator would have no problem out putting the electricity keeping the hydrogen flowing. Especially considering it was directly fed into the combustion chambers from the process of electrolysis. Didn't even need to produce alot, just had to produce enough to fill each chamber before each one went BANG! It's %100 do able you nut.

[@ChucksSEADnDEAD]

That violates the laws of thermodynamics. How do you get more energy from joining H2 to O2 than splitting it?

[@Jagueyes1]

Trying to convince some people is a waste of time. Mayer was on the right track.

[@Nonya704]

@@ChucksSEADnDEAD couldn’t you use a battery? Hho seems like a very energetic gas how about solar powered electrolysis the whole unit in the actual car

[@ChucksSEADnDEAD]

@@Nonya704 Of course you can. But the issue is that it would be better to just feed that electric energy from the battery to an electric motor. Same with solar. An internal combustion engine is 25-35% efficient. A PV solar panel is around 30% efficient. Even assuming the electrolysis is 100% efficient, you only get 10.5% efficiency from the solar energy running an internal combustion engine that's 35% efficient.

[@ErloBrown1]

Lekker Chris, dankie vir die goeie video.

[@PaulFrankAdams]

Firstly, Faraday's DC electrolysis (in 1833, during the age of steam) may have been inefficient, but modern computer-controlled resonant-frequency electrolysis certainly is not. If the three people sent to inspect the car did not see that it was using resonant-frequency electrolysis, then they were no experts. (Check out his patents, it's not rocket science!). Secondly, an aneurysm is very rare, a fatal one even rarer. An attack of an aneurysm would probably not lead to you running around shouting. More likely a bribed coroner! Don't forget, this was in the middle of an area of oil-rich industry. The right technology in the wrong place!

[@edstar83]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6vHm5WriZJ6l8U

[@gorrium5027]

Chemical bonds require the same amount of energy to split no matter what you use to split it. And chemicals don't release more energy forming then splitting. It's basic chemistry

[@PaulFrankAdams]

@@gorrium5027 It's incorrect chemistry.

[@notribadsvault]

The dude wasn’t poisoned, his car never worked, the concept itself that he proposes breaks several laws of thermodynamics, and the burden of proof is on the people who say otherwise. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, ideally in the form a functional engine.

[@PaulFrankAdams]

@@notribadsvault If you really study the science like I have been doing for many years you'll see that you can split water efficiently and it doesn't break any laws. Several people including a retired NASA scientist have got cars bikes and generators working on water alone but have quickly been silenced in one way or another. It's also been proven by the Centre for Electromagnetic Research at Northeastern University Boston that you can get more energy out of water than you used to release the hydrogen and oxygen. All engines work on hydrogen from fossil fuels but with carbon and only a small spark is needed to ignite it. Hydrogen and oxygen is a much more volatile combination, after all it's rocket fuel.