Star Trek 32nd Century U.S.S.Enterprise flyby and warp sequence

A short sequence of my latest 3D work. Still workin’ on it.
Enjoy

[@JamesFuentes526]

It's a great design but I am still not a fan of the separated hull/nacelle concept.

[@xheralt]

Star Trek meets Tron meets Rayman!

[@Dweller415]

Yeah the nacelles are stupid.

[@55elledge]

Okay, keep detached nacelles. Lose struts use energy stats instead. Cleaner design, plus you can variate the strut geometry inflight.

[@EgeSkywalker117]

@@55elledge well that's a good idea... I never liked those floating componets but you know... canon is canon so

[@doge_sevens]

It really looks like a halo 343 era forerunner ship concept with all the floaty bits

[@AviationGuyMelbourne]

I just realised in star trek discovery they found the ISS enterprise they can probably convert it into the USS enterprise and use programmable matter and add a new ship to the fleet detached naccelles and saucer with programmable matter

[@LinkTardis]

I honestly can see them using it as a museum piece. A genuine 23rd century era starfleet (granted terran yes) that is the copy of the most historical ship in the organization? Any history fan would go "Spock and Kirk stood here..."

[@blairbrown4812]

Unpopular opinion: Michael Burnham and the crew of The Discovery will transfer over to the new Enterprise.

[@AviationGuyMelbourne]

@@blairbrown4812 Not trying to be rude but the discovery crew is from discovery they know how to operate the sporedrive and the whole ship i think a new/diffrent crew will transport to the enterprise

[@davidmarecek3244]

@@AviationGuyMelbourne Don't forget we still have Tilly who "will one day be a captain"

[@AviationGuyMelbourne]

@@davidmarecek3244 A very good point who knows? she might Captain the enterprise (A Converted ISS version of course)

[@engcenturion2.093]

Finally a 32nd century ship that I don’t hate. Makes no difference who made it.

[@Avatar2312]

The nacelles are nice. Always liked the idea of having them floating to better adjust the warp field. But the separated saucer... I know personal transports and such, but turbolifts are still a thing and for this they it should stay connected to the engineering section.

[@EgeSkywalker117]

Prototype model was exactly like this. Saucer section was integrated to the neck and main engineering hull. I changed the final model because of reddit comments… and finally understand that I cant make everyone happy 😄

[@DoctorMysterio15]

Do worry not, Honestly the separated saucer is awesome and it could even work like the one from the Enterprise D​@@EgeSkywalker117

[@Killerspieler0815]

much better than the official 32nd century constitution

[@deathstrike]

32nd Century USS Enterprise makes flyby. Abramsverse USS Vengeance (32nd Century) crosses interdimensional barrier and smashes USS Enterprise. Vengeance Crew: "We just couldn't stand the sight of those awful wireless nacelles"

[@CaptainPositron]

The design stays true to the style set down by STD. However, that deflector dish may need workshopping. It's very flat, it could use something to make it feel a bit more 3D.

[@knytrydr73]

I haven't watched Discovery. What's the reason for the warp nacelles and the saucer floating off the secondary hull?

[@EgeSkywalker117]

For their canon, it’s much more agile with these options. It seems unnecessary but… you know 😂

[@graywolfUK]

space magic🤣

[@tred6292]

This close to it being called the Enterprise Q.

[@sith7441]

Absolut amazing Style 👍👍👍

[@spec9957]

Great animation!

[@ScramJett]

Can someone please explain to me the point behind the detachable warp nacelles are? In-universe?

[@tank3532]

Not bad design......should go well with STO.

[@kenm3245]

Would someone tell me the logical of having nacelles floating in space without a physical connection?

[@OptimusWombat]

Easier for variable warp field geometry? Lol

[@xheralt]

Easier to cast off in case the nacelle overloads and is going to explode?

[@TobysKpopTop50]

you could probably sell this art design to Cryptic (Star Trek ONline) or use it to create a mod for Bridge Commander (I would love either, cuz i would love to fly that ship)

[@EgeSkywalker117]

Thank you so much ! I’ll make it in future

[@gamzed.5373]

Good job!👏😮

[@XHunter442]

With detachable nacelles there's a possibility to expand the warp bubble!

[@nunyah8859]

Can't complain but this is gorgeous

[@daviddooley5361]

Cool design, but what happens when Starfleet reaches 1701-Z, do they use double letters?? Don't care for the nacelles being separate from the pylons though, too risky if the ship should end up in a battle with an adversary and the nacelles get knocked loose and windup spinning out of control hitting the Enterprise.

[@EgeSkywalker117]

Probably they’re gonna use two letters just like 1701-AA, 1701-AB etc. Also we use this system in archaeology to identify artifacts’ date and category

[@brunofoucart8472]

Interesting design

[@EgeSkywalker117]

thank you !

[@Sir_Boopth]

Good job, but I’m pretty sure the Neo constitution class was what the USS Enterprise was, the same class as the USS Armstrong

[@EgeSkywalker117]

probably... But we never see the new Enterprise in Disco. so I decided to model a new Enterprise within the original aspects of Constitution Class. I never liked the 32nd Century Constitution. something feels odd with this ship but with this design, it feels like that's how it should look.

[@dcdrew3]

It doesn't matter, they will never need ships that far in the future! Not with the advancement of Mr. Scott's Transporter Technology from ST movie2009. Other engineers will have a crew transporting all over the galaxy & back to earth for 6pm dinner! 🤣🤣

[@CHASEMARC]

Love it but we would be past J for the Enterprise

[@davetomlinson9063]

The whole loose flying formation thing doesn’t make sense.

[@Perurikun]

🤯🔥👊🖖

[@miles2378]

I would think starfleet would have exhausted to latine Alphabet by the 32nd century.

[@jaxspellinar]

At the rate they are going through them, it'd probably be doubling up, NCC-1701-BH or something

[@miles2378]

@@jaxspellinar they have the greek Alphabet.

[@jaxspellinar]

@@miles2378 But as soon as you get to Omega, you have to blow your ship up 🤣

[@rontmblroy9932]

I like it. Though since it uses the detached nacelles, It probably didn’t need the pylons for support anymore

[@EgeSkywalker117]

Actually it still needs it for warp geometry. They use Floating nacelles for maneuverability

[@NothingButEverything2023]

Nice ... it wouod fit well into discovery 👍

[@Barbariandisks]

Registry would have been are R by then

[@ryanblazi9303]

... it looks like if Tim Burton was asked for his take on a starship... Also- not a fan of the magical disconnected nacelles

[@MagnusGugilusVugilus]

Why does it look like a constitution class. It’s like building a modern ship to look like a trireme.

[@andresddr]

Why didn't you use the "E" to be the Enterprise of the 32nd century?

[@vanillagorilla8696]

The Mirror Universe Enterprise shows up in Discovery season 5.

[@andresddr]

@@vanillagorilla8696 hummm! I hadn't thought about that. You're right! 🙂👍🏻

[@vanillagorilla8696]

@@andresddr so, it technically has an enterprise and a potential refit enterprise. Could be interesting considering we have a neo Connie and a regular Connie in two slices of the timeline. Nostalgia is crystallized.

[@OptimusWombat]

Why would you use "E" that far into the future? We already have the "F" in the late 24th Century, the "G" in the early 25th Century, and the "J" some time in the 26th Century. When you consider how quickly they went from 1701 to 1701-G (8 ships in about 150 years), it's a minor miracle that it took 800 years for the next 11 ships (1701-H to 1701-R).

[@vanillagorilla8696]

@@OptimusWombat Enterprise Alpha 2, Enterprise Zeta?

[@user-uw4wx4mg5y]

HeraclesClass？

[@EgeSkywalker117]

Frontier Class Starship

[@gregharn1]

God no! I'd rather see an advancement of the Vesta class as the future of SF.

[@lordtrini]

No... this is not it... Its a step back...

[@terminalvelocity3977]

Starting to run low a letters their.

[@STEJTHEGREATEST]

Sad that this is 800 years after TNG and DS9. :(

[@Mmanifesto22]

Naaaaa.... it's great. Once discovery is over, we can forget about all the bs from season 3 on... like the burn. So stupid.....

[@Globalman43]

@@Mmanifesto22I disagree. Hate Discovery all you want, it has pushed Star Trek forward. There would be no Lower Decks, Prodigy, and Strange New Worlds if it wasn’t for Discovery.

[@Mmanifesto22]

@Globalman43 prodigy....I can live without it... picard season 1 and 2....I can live without it.... you know what I'm gonna say about lower decks? 🫠 season 2 of strange new worlds was a letdown. 🥲

[@Globalman43]

@@Mmanifesto22 That’s your opinion but it’s the truth. People said the same thing about DS9 and they were wrong. It made Star Trek better!

[@Globalman43]

@@Mmanifesto22 Strange New Worlds is going to find its niche. Lower Decks helped Star Trek and so has prodigy. With all due respect to the original animated series, it’s dated. Star Trek needs fresh blood in order to move forward.

[@charleslay7718]

This "detaching" garbage is exactly one of the reasons I can't stand Discovery.

[@residentmemberofhell]

That is somehow worse looking than the Connie III

[@2490debrick]

By the 32nd century The Federation will have mastered the Iconian Gateways so naff engineers can not design such horrors like this lol!

[@The_Corn_Show]

I'll just be happy when it's over and we can forget that they did this to the fleet. Detached engines and programmable matter are stupid as concepts. The ultimate mcguffin beside the spore drive or the sheer power of math 😅😅😅

[@Great_America]

Boring design