ST3 is a terrific film. (It’s not as strong an entry as ST2, but what movie could be?) It also has some of William Shatner’s finest acting moments in the role of James T. Kirk. Leonard Nimoy’s direction was solid, and he got good performances out of Shatner and the rest of the cast. Christopher Lloyd, as usual, plays himself.
@agentfiftyseven12 жыл бұрын
"How can you be deaf with EARS like that??" DeForest Kelley is pure gold in this film.
@soupful2 жыл бұрын
How very true and every ST Film there after as well.
@RhapsodyInBlaah2 жыл бұрын
That "How many fingers am I holding up" line is perfection.
@snoopytrekschannel2 жыл бұрын
.. they actually had to tie the shat's fingers together with black threat because he can't separate them the right way into the vulcan symbol
@hagerty195210 ай бұрын
@@snoopytrekschannel- That's OK, neither can I.
@mallninja98052 жыл бұрын
The ship was the standout star of the movie. "Stealing the Enterprise" is one of the best scenes in all of Star Trek, and had its own great death scene. I was 11 at the time, and distinctly remember being gratified that they finally went all the way with the destruct sequence.
@Paul_19712 жыл бұрын
Probably my favourite sequence of the Genesis Trilogy
@Paul_19712 жыл бұрын
Love the amusingly placed clip inserts
@JGG17012 жыл бұрын
Gratified????? Why?
@bob233012 жыл бұрын
You are not wrong about that gut punch over the enterprise, i remember sitting watching this on VHS rental back in the mid 80s and the bit they watched the flaming enterprise streaking across the sky was indeed a gut punch.
@TheRadioAteMyTV2 жыл бұрын
Then they did it so many times afterward that it lost all potency going forward and was equivalent to the another death star having to be blown up.. YAWN!
@bob233012 жыл бұрын
@@TheRadioAteMyTV I stopped watching any new Trek after the Tv show Enterprise finished, i won't touch the JJ universe apple store shiny things trek, i won't touch STD, which is the write name for it, or the charactor assasination piece that is Picard, BUT, i did give SNW a go and i liked what i saw, so i await season 2 with my fingers crossed. ;)
@daveroche65222 жыл бұрын
Agreed - a real "AW, SHIT!" moment. Remember that bit in 'The Naked Time' (the original, NOT that skinpeelingly bad episode of TNG) where Kirk is losing it, puts his hand on a door panel or something as says to the Enterprise "I'll never lose you" - still great! Mind you - I don't recall Virgil doing/saying something similar to Thunderbird 2, prior to it being accidentally shot down by 'de navy'.
@TheRadioAteMyTV2 жыл бұрын
@@bob23301 You are wise. I have watched some of the new stuff and it was not Star Trek at all. Good to hear about Strange New Worlds. I have not messed with it, but glad to hear good things. I might get around to it still with such good recommendations.
@deathlokprime26452 жыл бұрын
I grew up on TOS. I had the blueprints. I made a decent replica of the bridge in my bedroom. I watched the Enterprise die in the theater, and almost cried.
@vernonlemoignan13922 жыл бұрын
I was 15 at the time, and my dad and i both phoned in sick to go watch the premier of ST3. First time i had ever done something like that. Back then, nobody knew what would happen and it was like watching a live sporting event. The crowd cheering and yelling and reacting. I lived and breathed star trek, all my life. Watching the enterprise being destroyed horrified me. At first the damage wasn’t too bad, it could be fixed , then an explosion, still fixable…. Burning up in the atmosphere, nope. I sobbed most of the way home.
@JGG17012 жыл бұрын
Dads are great 👍 Always remember that. 😉
@KarlWitsman Жыл бұрын
Ha ha! Loved the tie-in with 'In Search Of' footage.
@carter3582 жыл бұрын
Paramount insisted Nimoy get some more directing experience before filming, so Shatner arranged for him to direct an episode of T.J. Hooker. Paramount execs were impressed and gave him the go ahead to direct STIII.
@Grim22 жыл бұрын
16:37 - Spot on. Also, it's irksome whenever someone dismisses the movie due to Christopher Lloyd. The man kicked ass in the movie, yet some keep whining how all they see is Doc Brown... pure cynical idiocy.
@RenePeraza2 жыл бұрын
This is an example of a trilogy of films (II, III & IV) each unique and not part if a preplanned arc, but work beautifully together. LOVE the idea that Saavik remained on Vulcan because she was pregnant. Sadly, no other film or show in the franchise touched on this. What a missed opportunity! That child would be a perfect lead protagonist age in Picard's era!
@jonhall31515 ай бұрын
Agreed! Missed potential there, indeed! I’d say write it and get a copy write on it if Trek weren’t already dead.
@phreadimus4now1362 жыл бұрын
Many years ago I watched this movie on acid and came up with the alternative title "Finding Nimoy"
@g0mtnlee2 жыл бұрын
I've only recently discovered Stam Fine and have been enjoying the gems in the extensive back catalogue over the last week. There are many YT channels with similar reviews of course - but the combination of the "just right amount of detail", the presentation and the humour make it stand out from the crowd for me. Each subject is obviously well researched and many are labours of love (just thinking back to "And in the 4th series of The Goodies..", MASH and the recent Babylon5.) Live long and be nostalgic.
@TheRadioAteMyTV2 жыл бұрын
Hahahha me too. I found him through Man from Atlantis two weeks ago and just like you I went to his first videos and am catching up as well. Him and Minty Comedic Arts and Jonny Baak are all Ausies who really know how to do this retro film thing super well. Stam is the weakest on research of the three but strongest on humour inserts.
@shannonbayley36842 жыл бұрын
Yes he definitely has an edge others don't. The reviews feel nostalgic but are generally more fun and legitimately funny in places, as well as being super knowledgeable about the subject matter. It's perfectly balanced.
@paulbrecken21362 жыл бұрын
More excellence from Stam Fine. Always look forward to seeing your content.
@diverguy35562 жыл бұрын
James Horner's soundtracks are kick ass - they always get me pumped when I hear them!
@carlrood44572 жыл бұрын
Comedian, Kevin Pollick , is a big Star Trek fan and does a great bit about how without the makeup, Kruge is Reverend Jim from Taxi. If you've never seen the show, go watch now. Lloyd did a guest spot in the first season and was brought back as a regular in season 2. The scene of him taking his driver test is a comedy classic.
@edwardbloecher45632 жыл бұрын
I saw Maurice LaMarche do a good routine. Young comedian special in 80s.
@jeffjenner50302 жыл бұрын
Have you seen the Futurama episode"Where no fan has gone before". It has a wonderful quote from Nimoy and Shattner . Nimoy "When I directed Star Trek 4 I got a great perfomane out of Bill because I respect him so much" Shattner "And when I directed Star Trek 5 I got a great peformane out of me because i respect me so much"
@MountainDewComacho4942 жыл бұрын
I really loved Christopher Loyd as a Klingon. When I first watched the film, I still thought of him as that guy from Taxi.
@christopherclark279 Жыл бұрын
Naming one of the Starfleet vessels, Grissom was a nice touch. A nod to the Apollo 1 crew
@BTScriviner8 ай бұрын
Except the Grissom gets destroyed, and Gus Grissom was killed, along with astronauts White and Chaffee, when the Apollo 1 capsule caught fire in 1967.
@Boogenhagen1002 жыл бұрын
I guess my dad was a secret Spock fanboy- he had the exact same haircut as older Spock here. RIP dad.
@JGG17012 жыл бұрын
Saw this in theater when it first came out. I remember Enterprises death scene. So sad seeing that and the whole theater audience was soooooooo quite when it happened. Wow!🤯
@raymondcanessa72082 жыл бұрын
I was in shock for a while. Nothing like a connie
@jonathanfeldheim65542 жыл бұрын
This is the most positive review of STIII I've ever seen/heard, and it's well stated (as usual, Stam Fine, I mean how do you not have more subscribers?). I can't remember before STIV (and seen all movies since), but this finally has given me the interest to finally watch STIII.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
The hate over III is just silly. The film is a fine space adventure movie.
@Paul_19712 жыл бұрын
ST III is great - love TWOK & TSFS equally
@TheRadioAteMyTV2 жыл бұрын
@@ricardocantoral7672 It's the curse of being a sandwich film. It's a great film but it serves its purpose so well of finishing 2 and prepping for four it can't be a stand out because it can't stand alone. A true victim of its own success.
@TheRadioAteMyTV2 жыл бұрын
KZbin has just started pushing him, as so many others are new and saying the same thing, so he is now going to get slammed with lot of new folk and he is good enough to keep it going. Hope others go back though, because he has always been doing it right.
@MattMcIrvin2 жыл бұрын
It's a decent popcorn movie. Has its cheesy aspects, but all Star Trek movies inevitably do.
@Restitutor_Orbis_2142 жыл бұрын
The Search for Spock received a poor reception because some reviewers looking back at the original Star Trek movies see it in between II and IV. It was the first Star Trek movie I saw in theaters and when it came out it was considered a strong, successful entry leading into Star Trek IV being approved by Paramount. I appreciate this review and will add some strong points about this movie: 1. This movie is very cinematic in that it feels like a movie. Whatever budget limitation they had the original series movies always felt cinematic. Compare and contrast this with the TNG movies where two felt very much like episodes (Generations, Insurrection) and one descended into schlock action (Nemesis). 2. The movie continues the themes from Wrath of Khan and shows a logical progression of developing and use of the Genesis device. 3. The depiction of the Klingons is remarkable. They are ruthless, menacing, and the depiction of them progressed from what was established in the original series. Christopher Lloyd deserves a lot of credit for bringing a wonderful villain to the screen. Kruge actually called Kirk's bluff and forced him to improvise. He manages to make Kruge interesting and while he may simply seem like a one note villain he comes across as someone with deeper motivations. The Klingons were completely ruined in TNG and DS9. This started with the TNG writers forgetting the Romulans were the honorable race in TOS. Ronald D. Moore completely reduced them to a defanged caricature that was a worse joke than the Ferengi when they started. You do not see the TOS film and movie Klingons talking ad nauseum about honor, roaring, acting like feral animals and being absurd. Robert O'Reiley 4. This movie captured the brilliant character moments of TOS. Kirk and the crew putting everything on the line to save Spock was a remarkable continuation of theme and spirit in classic Trek that was absent from the TNG movies and completely non-existent in the so-called reboots that are Star Trek in name only. I rank Star Trek III above all the TNG movies and reboot films and only find VI, IV and of course II as better films overall. I never realized just how good we had it.
@richardmattocks2 жыл бұрын
“Pop a Spock on it” is one of the greatest phrases ever! Anything is better if you pop a Spock on it! 🤣
@shaggycan2 жыл бұрын
I remember my uncle taking me and my brother to see this on Dundas Street in London (Canada). One of my first theatre memories.
@bigneon_glitter2 жыл бұрын
_STIII_ is a solid, fun heist caper and a love story about a man who loses everything in the hope of saving the one thing he can't live without: his friend. The major flaw was the miscasting of Christopher Lloyd over Edward James Olmos. Nimoy wanted Olmos but Harve Bennett blocked it.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
Olmos, Rutger Hauer, or Armand Assante would have been good choices. I think Lloyd did a good job but I would have preferred one of the aforementioned names.
@shannonbayley36842 жыл бұрын
Lloyd was good, but I'll never not see Doc Emmett Brown 🤣
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
@@shannonbayley3684 Outside of Doc Brown, my favorite Chris Lloyd role was as the surprisingly creepy character in the movie The Onion Field. He plays a character only known as "The Jailhouse Lawyer", a deathrow inmate. His real name is never revealed and neither is his crime. He doesn't have a lot of screentime and he unceremoniously disappears but you won't forget him after the credits role.
@TheLAGopher11 ай бұрын
Lloyd was already the "it"guy by 1983 when Search for Spock was being cast. Olmos career would really take off when Miami Vice debut on NBC in the fall of 1984.
@daveroche65222 жыл бұрын
During a random conversation, suddenly do a sharp intake of breath, followed by "GENESIS!!!???". Works every time!
@chrisaguilera7512 жыл бұрын
A lot of firsts introduced in this movie. The Bird of Prey got its debut, Klingons that we know them now, Grissom class, The space Station, Transwarp.
@TheLAGopher11 ай бұрын
Also USS Excelsior, the first accurate depiction of Vulcan (since the visual effects in STTMP were not properly completed when that film was released), and the first real depiction of the galactic political situation which we see from the view point of Starfleet Command and which would be expanded upon in later TOS films to include the Federation Council the Federation President, and the Starfleet Admiralty. The Star Trek world which had been so focused around the Enterprise during the television series and first two films, was really fleshed out to show how Starfleet was this vast organization.
@ferociousgumby2 жыл бұрын
Shatner's hair by House of Wigs!
@kthx11382 жыл бұрын
The Wrath of Wigs!
@noseotter-01 Жыл бұрын
Watching “the Search for Spock” in the theater as a kid and being a major trekker, it’s hard to overstate what a big deal the destruction of the Enterprise was. I actually got into a state after that, when Kirk was fighting Kor, where I legitimately thought that Kirk might die - even though my brain “knew” that wouldn’t happen. Yeah it was very powerful stuff, and I personally mourned the Enterprise.
@colinmontgomery195610 ай бұрын
He was fighting Kruge.
@blanketfortressofsolitude52706 ай бұрын
"Kirk has had some fine times in things that are 20 years old," Good lord, man, you're hilarious.
@oobrocks2 жыл бұрын
Stan does a “fine” job of combining entertainment and research 🎉
@snoopytrekschannel2 жыл бұрын
.. nothing new we fans didn't already know but your presentation, humor and wit (the enterprise cosplay bit about using an elevator 🤣) made your video and a chance for nostalgic welcomed! Btw David's death wasn't really a necessary plot point. Harve Bennett said he just didn't know what to do with the character.
@valmarsiglia2 жыл бұрын
Military vessels that are 20 years old are still basically teenagers. I can't even fathom how much it would cost to build the Enterprise; I'm sure it was made to last more than 20 years.
@TheRadioAteMyTV2 жыл бұрын
What came after Star Trek III, was the atrocious re-use of blowing up the Enterprise. When they did it in three it was a true tear jerker moment for all Star Trek fans, but then they just kept destroying the ship again and again. They took something powerful and real and turned it trite and cheap - no different than the million death stars all showing up and all having trenches to be blown up. Talk about ruining not just a good thing but a real thing that was amazing, and making it into a plastic ring from the top of a cup cake that can't wait to be thrown out as soon as it is touched.
@MotiviqueStudio2 жыл бұрын
I tend to forget just how gorgeous some of the shots in 3 were.
@lindaschulman17892 жыл бұрын
I always liked 3. It was about the 3 main guys, most like an episode.
@daveroche65222 жыл бұрын
Christopher Lloyd - "CAMELPOO CHARDONNAY" - ok not accurate Klingon but it still works (at wedding etc., just before I'm told (yet again) to em, 'grow up'). Fun!
@jameswalker5796 Жыл бұрын
The Enterprise blowing up was actually in the trailers but it wasn't clear whether it was the Enterprise or another Constitution class vessel. We didn't think they'd actually blow it up, so it did come as a shock.
@raybearoz2 жыл бұрын
Great work as always mate.... Looking forward to IV
@mraims2plez2 жыл бұрын
When that guy told him he'd never sit in the captain's chair, Kirk was already an admiral.
@TheUballe2 жыл бұрын
Awesome writing, delivery, presentation and editing!
@kthx11382 жыл бұрын
Nimoy's FIRST masterpiece as a director (he'd have a few more)!
@shannonbayley36842 жыл бұрын
@@kthx1138 He's talking about this video, not ST3. But yes, Leonard Nimoy did a great job on this and other's.
@calvinkatt6622 жыл бұрын
I agree with you on Search For Spock getting a bad rep due to it being an odd numbered film. It's a good film, and it's the middle chapter of one of the best trilogies ever. And not all even numbered Trek films were good. Star Trek: Nemesis was the 10th film.
@lancebaylis3169 Жыл бұрын
What do you do when your last film killed Spock? You pop a Spock in the directing spot.
@t.sniffin303112 күн бұрын
One clarifying point...ST2 made $79.8 million, while the first movie made $82.7 million. Technically, Wrath of Khan made less, but that's generally regarded as a similar box office performance. And because of its cost over runs, The Motion Picture needed to gross 2 or 3 times its budget to even be profitable. It isn't about "cheap space adventures", it was about setting a realistic budget so they wouldn't lose money.
@mattblom39905 ай бұрын
Christopher Lloyd was always a top #3 Klingon for me through the entire saga. He nailed it.
@bazzatheblue5 ай бұрын
Doc Brown witb a bumpy head id say.
@GrandAdmThrawn2 жыл бұрын
It's Friday so it's another Stam Fine video. Let's go ❤
@fredrikcarlstedt3932 жыл бұрын
All hail Captain Jonathan T. Esteban, the most cautious Caprain of the Starfleet !
@carlrood44572 жыл бұрын
I always wondered if there's a reason his first and middle initials are the same as Kirk's.
@fredrikcarlstedt3932 жыл бұрын
@@carlrood4457 Wonder if it is from from here Captain Archer got his first name, or he got it from Commander Frakes .
@JGG17012 жыл бұрын
"Risk" must not have been in his vocabulary.
@HappyArchaeology-mm4ng4 ай бұрын
Excellent movie. Like a western. Genes intention. A western in space.
@tomsenior74052 жыл бұрын
Bloody funny review. Cheers mate.
@kaguya690028 күн бұрын
Klingon son, you killed my bastard!!
@Grumpy-Fallboy2 жыл бұрын
thanks for all the extra info and detail in this video. Awesome;
@artyfartblast32892 жыл бұрын
This is my favourite. I recorded it on VHS back in the 80s and would watch it every weekend. I still know most of the dialogue. The model work is superb and man, that "stealing the Enterprise" sequence is outstanding.
@SJKPJR0072 жыл бұрын
Great work Stam Fine. Thank you for all the thought and effort you invest in your content.
@erichtomanek47392 жыл бұрын
The insert of the In Search Of segment was a nice touch. Good video.
@peterloohunt10 ай бұрын
Cracking humour, love this newly found channel. Subscribed!
@OneofInfinity.2 жыл бұрын
I really liked how the universal translator did not translate French into Klingon, take that Frenchie's 😆
@timewarpdrive77 Жыл бұрын
"fine; I'll kill you later." Great line and best way to deal with a klingon
@GiantBoarMonster Жыл бұрын
Costume design on this was outstanding. Refreshing that it isn't the uniform all the time. Those retro-futuristic looks could become popular even today. Ya never know. Except for Chekov's little boy outfit. bless his heart
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
This film really shouldn't be seen as an example of the uneven film curse. The first act was weak but when Kirk and company finally take off for Genesis, it ends up being a fine space adventure flick and I honestly think it's better than The Undiscovered Country.
@omalleycaboose59372 жыл бұрын
really I always felt the first act was the best part and the villain drags it down
@jamest24012 жыл бұрын
Chekov’s outfit in this film looks like, what my brother and I called the "Pink Pilgrim".😆
@briandain84322 жыл бұрын
At 15:56, haven't mentioned it yet but might the cool wing design was actually Nimoy's own idea to ILM.
@masseyhemenway2657Ай бұрын
Not true because it's odd#!!! Star Trek III was very good that showed just how much the crew was dedicated to one another. Great film!
@johnellizz2 жыл бұрын
I find that the later films haven't aged too good. But 1 & 2 still hold up.
@neesi15702 жыл бұрын
I always see the captain of the Excelsior as Doogie Howser's Dad.
@daveroche65222 жыл бұрын
I had one BIG question 5 seconds after seeing Generations - did Captain Peckerhead NOT (have to) do the Kobayashi Maru test? If not, why not? Still awaiting an answer....
@BZDouglasJournalist2 жыл бұрын
Fun auto-captioning moment when you bring up Spock's Vulcan puberty, aka "pond fire".
@BZDouglasJournalist2 жыл бұрын
Oh they keep coming... "As we say on Earth: 'Celery'"
@ElOchentero2 жыл бұрын
Im a Trekker, but I can't believe a community can be so idiotic as to think that a movie is bad just for having an odd number. That's one of the most toxic superstitions ever to come out of a fandom.
@TheLAGopher11 ай бұрын
It wasn't really the fandom pushing that at first. It was film reviewers Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert who were trying to put forward a point of view that Star Trek II and Star Trek IV had much more main stream appeal based on the action and presence of Ricardo Montaban in ST II and due to the lighter tone, and environmental messaging of ST IV. They were putting it out there that the first and third films were more trekkie orientated and didn't appeal as much to those who were not devoted fans of the franchise. When ST V actually bombed in the summer of 1989 (dominated by Batman and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, and Ghostbusters 2, it really set in, that odd numbered Trek films were all bad films.
@ElOchentero11 ай бұрын
@@TheLAGopher ugh one more reason to dislike Ebert who I always thought is overrrated
@ricardocantoral76727 ай бұрын
@@ElOchentero What's funny is, Ebert gave I and III positive reviews. Then when VI was released, he said only the even numbered Treks worked.
@colinwatt93876 ай бұрын
Somehow, Genesis has made Spock return.
@KJTB82 жыл бұрын
Just found your channel after the algorithm suggested this vid - already subscribed and queued up about 10 others! Heres hoping you get to Undiscovered Country - I'd love to hear what you think about my personal absolute favourite Trek film!
@Pondimus_Maximus2 жыл бұрын
Stan Fine, I just discovered your channel, and subscribed. Very nice work! I like this film a lot, but I have some gripes with it. I don’t know how much negotiation they did with Kirstie Alley’s agent, but it was a mistake to recast her. Some of the soundstage scene were extremely obvious, which was distracting. Chekov’s civilian clothes were a crime against the galaxy! The biggest sin of all, was leaving Uhura behind. She loved Spock as much as everyone else, and should have been with the boys on the mission. Anyhow, I’m looking forward to watching more of your reviews! 🖖😀
@DerHoschi2 жыл бұрын
"Face the music"! Please do Bill & Ted. Less known in germany but in 33 years I got many, many people to see/like it. And the german version is special in syncro. They made it their own with (not exact translated) special quotes. Bunt ist das Dasein und granatenstark. Volle Kanne, Hoschi!
@jamest24012 жыл бұрын
Star Trek: Generations was an excellent film! I have never heard anything of it being considered poor.
@feanol22 Жыл бұрын
Enterprise destruction was painful to watch.
@TheRadioAteMyTV2 жыл бұрын
Star Trek III is a great film, but you are right, it suffers from it's success of being a bridge movie. Watching it in retrospect does like you said, every frame feels like a set up for the following movie and finishing touches on the prior film. It is not a stand alone film at all. When we saw it in the theaters we didn't know for sure there would be a follow up, but since the film industry was swamped in sequels it seemed likely (not like now where it's a ll reboots of 40 year old titles - geesh!). It's a great film, but it never felt and really isn't a stand alone film, so it doesn't get to stand out either.
@richardbuckley12322 жыл бұрын
I really like this movie - in its own way it is as strong as 2 and 4. Great review 😊
@tomjewell77592 жыл бұрын
Of course Bill Shatner put out the fire, saved the set, and saved millions of LA citizens from a burning hellish death.
@robbieaussievic2 жыл бұрын
.... Never recovered from the psychosis induced by the image of the pantomime gremlin suit.
@niamhryan96772 жыл бұрын
Stam your reviews are just as epic and legendary as these Star Trek Movies..thank you I've laughed so much. I'm a new sub and a huge fan now. Good on you buddy 👍👍👍😎
@kthx11382 жыл бұрын
Pretty damn fine recovery from Spock's death, plausible resurrection story! It made sense that the Genesis planet would regenerate Spock!
@mikes56372 жыл бұрын
I remember sitting in the cinema as a young man and crying silently at the destruction of the Enterprise.
@matthewmcneill26072 жыл бұрын
An entertaining and lively review. Thanks mate!
@MrJohndoakes11 ай бұрын
I see Star Treks II and III as one long film, with "Star Trek IV" as the comedy sequel.
@sitoudien98162 жыл бұрын
All rise for the destruction of the Enterprise. Who didn't shed a tear for her glorious destruction?
@SteveSmith-wk9dx2 жыл бұрын
I always felt this was an underrated film, and IV somewhat overrated. IV is so often the Star Trek for non-Trek fans, with its largely Earthbound setting and cheesy humour. III, while never hitting the heights of Wrath of Khan, really does a great job. DeForest Kelly gets to show off his acting chops and Christopher Lloyd's scenery-devouring performance as Kruge arguably redefined Klingons for the Next Gen era. "Yes, exhilarating, isn't it?"
@carter3582 жыл бұрын
Please explain the "Auntie Beryl walks out the jungle with a necklace of human teeth" reference.
@StamFine2 жыл бұрын
she's had an interesting life.
@deadandburied7626 Жыл бұрын
Vonda McIntyre's novelisation is worth reading as it goes deeper.
@nealwhaley63 Жыл бұрын
Kudos to her for patching several of the holes in the script.
@markholmphotography Жыл бұрын
Come on! of course Trek fans knew the Enterprise was a big character one the franchise - that’s why we got all those shots in the 1st Trek film when Kirk sees the updated Enterprise. Despite all the jokes, True Trek fans know #3 was a good film.
@AndrewChapman Жыл бұрын
9:59 Well, Chekov had been serving on the Reliant in the previous film up until Khan commandeered it. Maybe that's why🤣
@iLikeTheUDK2 жыл бұрын
Robin Curtis as Saavik kind of looks like Zachary Quinto with a wig having done voice training
@ronstewtsaw9 ай бұрын
I just watched it for the first time since I was 21 and saw it in first run. At the time, I kept my expectations down, since Wrath of Khan was (and remains) my favorite movie. I was disappointed anyway. On tonight's rewatch, I thought that the visual effects were awful around the spacedock. I wish that nobody ever had taught me about exposition, because the exposition is so hamfisted here. And three times people talk on the radio telling the person on the other end that they are talking on the radio. Christopher Lloyd is great here. I completely missed John Laroquette. The stealing the Enterprise sequence is great. The luring the Klingon crew to its death sequence is great. The fight between Kirk and the Klingon commander is long and unbelievable. (There is only one movie that has succeeded with one opponent on top of a cliff with his enemy hanging on the edge: Blade Runner. Special mention to The Princess Bride for cleverly avoiding the problem.) (Peter Jackson totally ripped off the falling into lava shot in Return of the King.) How the disarmed Enterprise crew took the Klingon ship was never explained, or even hinted at. The Enterprise crew was uniformly good, but that cannot be said of all the supporting actors. A more experienced director would have fixed that. One word to describe STIII: Uneven.
@JamesCorp Жыл бұрын
Can I say I never liked the reason for the planet being unstable given in the film, I always though that the planet being made from a nebular would have been sufficient excuse enough
@mrmeerkat10962 жыл бұрын
I wish they would make trek films now, in the same way as they did in the 80s but with even better FX. Instead of the crap we have been getting for the last 12 years or so, with the crazy Camera angles and lens flair and terrible scripts ect. I've always really liked this movie with the stealing of the enterprise and its destruction. Kirk's reaction to losing his son, falling back off his chair and being upset but he still has to save his crew in that moment also. I could never understand why certain fans of the franchise didn't like the search for Spock.
@JGG17012 жыл бұрын
I totally agree. I miss the vibe of 80's/90's Star Trek. Really miss the ORIGINAL CREW.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
Abrams Trek would have had Kirk demanding that he stay on board so he could kill the Klingons one by one with the timer running out. He also would have killed Kruge without hesitation instead of offering him a chance to live. He probably would have broken his neck, yelled, and then tossed his body into the lava. Way better than those boring movies that old people like. Joking aside, '09 Trek had a purpose and that was to get the average movie goer into the theaters. I didn't like the film but I understand why it was written the way it was. Into Darkness was the one that should have been something that the fans would have appreciated. Instead, we got a TV buddy cop scenario mixed in with in yet another regurgitation of Wrath of Khan. That film is easily the worst feature length Trek film of all.
@deeconstruction81632 жыл бұрын
Well now you have to review "In Search Of..."
@ScottIngram2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Bizlok2 жыл бұрын
Great commentary, of a Great film.
@redringofdeathgamer2 жыл бұрын
Ahh... More fines and a good movie = good morning.
@toddnolastname44852 жыл бұрын
One of the worst things that Star Trek was guilty of. They killed off Scotty's nephew, Kirk's son, and Picard's nephew. Did Sulu's daughter survive, or was she also a casualty?
@SamLowryDZ-0152 жыл бұрын
He's where you left him.
@kjamison59512 жыл бұрын
I think we can all agree that V sucked. As for the odd numbered / even numbered debate… I don’t hold to that. But that’s just my opinion and we all have our opinions. III was a good film. Some humor, some tragedy, some adventure. And it provided the segue to IV… which was a barrel of laughs with the crew acting like a fish out of water. Not meant as a pun - whales are mammals, not fish.
@white-dragon4424 Жыл бұрын
3:45 I've never been able to understand it either. By today's navy standards, 20 years is barely midlife for a warship, especially a capital ship. 4:13 Oh, the irony: Bimbo: "Brain, brain, what is brain?!"
@andygrams63442 жыл бұрын
It’s interesting… Nimoy got a better performance from Shatner than Meyer - Meyer used the method of having Shatner repeat his lines endlessly until he was bored - and it shows in II and VI. III is by far the most emotional of all, and I would say feels more epic than II… better editing and cinematography. So much of II feels so much cheaper… the music (Horner vastly improved this time), the scope, fx, sound, ILM’s work. I rank the original Trek movies best to least: I, III, V, II, IV, VI. V trumps the others because of nostalgia, seeing it in a Cinerama theater when I was 8…. and it has THE best music of all the films. The odd numbers also happen to be most like the original show (and II a bit)
@flashrobbie2 жыл бұрын
Hi Aunty Beryl. Aunty Em would like her "cake tin" back.
@SommersetStriker2 жыл бұрын
I'm still not really clear who exactly they're searching for in this film.
@DavyDredd142 жыл бұрын
The Search For Themselves
@JGG17012 жыл бұрын
Yes, it could have used a better title. I remember the long pause between Shatner and Kelley with the opening credits leaving Nimoy's name out. What a tease.😄