Stirner vs. Nietzsche

In this video, we dive into the philosophical worlds of Max Stirner and Friedrich Nietzsche, two towering figures of radical individualism. Although often compared for their rejection of traditional morality and authority, Stirner’s Egoism and Nietzsche’s concept of the Übermensch take very different approaches to selfhood, freedom, and power. Join me as we explore the fundamental differences between these two thinkers, drawing on scholarly analysis to examine their ideas on autonomy, rebellion, and the creation of new values. Are you content with living for yourself, or do you seek to master the world? Watch the full video and decide which philosophy resonates with you.
Chapters:
Introduction: 0:01 - 0:30
Comparative Analysis: 0:31 - 1:45
The Negative Egoist vs. the Positive Ideal of the Übermensch: 1:46 - 2:23
Philosopher of Being vs. Philosopher of Becoming: 2:24 - 3:15
Destruction vs. Creation: 3:16 - 4:22
Autonomy vs. Power: 4:23 - 5:04
Power vs. Felt Power: 5:05 - 6:36
Indifference to Nihilism vs. Life-Affirming Nihilism: 6:37 - 8:22
Conclusion: 8:22 - 9:57
You can also READ the extended version of this video essay here: open.substack....
The New E-Zine: creative-nothi...
If you would like to support the project, please consider the following options.
Info about the project: recurringparad...
Join for free: / recurringparadox
Contribute: / membership
If you want to learn more about me:
My LinkTree: linktr.ee/anek...
*if you use some of these links to make a purchase, I will receive a commission via the Amazon Associates Program*
Books & texts used for reference:
Cancian, A. (2020). NIHILISM: The Emptiness of the Machine. Void Press: amzn.to/4guq5md
Deleuze, G. (1962). Nietzsche and Philosophy. Columbia University Press: amzn.to/4ebQlAm
Nehamas, A. (1985). Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Harvard University Press: amzn.to/3TBOjBg
Newman, S. (2001). From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power. Lexington Books: amzn.to/3XQKSck
Schmitt, C. (1922). Political Theology. University of Chicago Press: amzn.to/3XSCGZo
Solomon, R. C. (2003). Living with Nietzsche: What the Great "Immoralist" Has to Teach Us. Oxford University Press: amzn.to/4gBilPi
Stirner, M. (1844). The Ego and Its Own. Cambridge University Press: amzn.to/3MSt4Y3

[@MutualAidWorks]

Another great vid, much appreciated. I lost interest in philosophy and that sort of thing, but your vids have actually revived my interest somewhat and I also find the focus on psychoanalysis/psychology interesting aswell 👍 I make KZbin videos aswell (from an anarchist viewpoint) but I would say my video making abilities are rather limited - whereas I'd say yours are much better.

[@Mageuzichannel]

Great video

[@Manic_misanthrope_]

“Despite Nietzsche’s scintillating idol-smashing he is haunted by yet another idol: the idol of an abstractified ‘Man’ scheduled for redemption by the creation of the Superman.” - S.E. Parker

[@EthanNoble]

Makes sense considering how chronically sick he was, that he would look to the future

[@Manic_misanthrope_]

@@EthanNobleA phantasm is a phantasm, my friend.

[@Itsmespiv4192]

negative freedom vs positive freedom

[@stickittotheman00]

Your videos are awesome! But some constructive critic, if you want... If not just ignore it! Try to interpretate more the reading, making it more natural then read it, like giving it more emotion... But the content is exceptional!

[@recurringparadox]

@@stickittotheman00 what do you mean by emotional?

[@recurringparadox]

I am neurodivergent. Can you explain why emotionality would be better? I believe that these concepts require a certain level caution and care in order to avoid spookiness and emotional/sensual entanglement. My voice is often perceived as very sensual when I speak freely, which seems to lead to people taking me less seriously. I would like to avoid sensuality as it's a dangerous distraction in my opinion.

[@zerdüş-tt]

I like max stirner’s philosophy but ı think in bad hands it can lead some violent actions like murder,r*pe etc but maybe I misunderstood his philosophy pls correct me if I am wrong

[@recurringparadox]

@@zerdüş-tt i think any philosophy can aid a person in rationalizing choices. But to say that a non-ideological anti-essentialist philosophy is the REASON a person chooses to act in the way they do is a very essentializing way to look at anti-essentialist philosophy.

[@Snoozelightable]

8:47. What’s the music in the background there

[@recurringparadox]

Shadow Moses by Choir Noir