LeelaZero BRILLIANTLY Sacrificed Her Two Pieces Against The Chess King Stockfish | Chess Strategy

[@jessejordache1869]

Leela's search method makes everything _highly_ speculative, by computer standards. So I love it when her games feature material sacrifices.

[@GünayAvcı-s3d]

Macı sırf seyircinin hoşuna gitmesi için erteliyorum😊

[@Knightstrikes]

@Stockfish I said it before, I will say it again: STOP THE SIMPING!! She is wrecking you bro. Stay strong Champ!! Guard your CPU!!

[@game834]

Nice game ❤

[@GünayAvcı-s3d]

1 atak sen psf olmak üzere 1 sene sonra görüşürüz bay stockfish ve strnç camiası😊dibini izliyorum burda😊

[@GünayAvcı-s3d]

Bir sene turnuva izni istiyorum bay stockfish biraz derin çalışmak istiyorum tüm gözlerden gizli😊

[@PParker26]

Hello Leela you're a great Master ✨

[@GünayAvcı-s3d]

Satranç keleklerinden bay stockfihs😊

[@GünayAvcı-s3d]

Satrancin en fena adami😊

[@christiansekumade1223]

White has the advantage.

[@KH-lo3mk]

This game leaves you with two questions: firstly, has Leela refuted Benoni? And secondly, if not, where did you actually go wrong? Was accepting the two sacrifices a mistake?

[@GünayAvcı-s3d]

2 atak anlaşılmaz😊

[@richi2870]

Chatgpt can capture his own piece 😅

[@sadiaislammim6290]

Leela my crush

[@mabrand2999]

5. f4 ? wait... what ?I wonder which leela is playing here, obviously not the one I had installed, 'cause f4 was never her 1st choice and after a few seconds of calculation she already discard it. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

[@Wakssbm]

there are 2 possible answers to your question. 1. leela didn't choose this move itself, it was part of the book moves chosen by the TOs. In these high level computer tournaments the TOs usually choose a couple of opening moves in order to minimize draws, or prevent computers from always playing the same line over and over against themselves. Then the computers take the lead and start playing after these chosen opening moves. 2. The leela here was on much better hardware than the one on your computer. I know TCEC has some computing hardware that dwarfs the traditional home computers, even with those high end GPUs and CPUs.

[@mabrand2999]

​@@Wakssbm the 2nd possibility does not apply, like I make it clear in my comment, in my computer leela only takes 3 or 4 seconds to give up that move, in a faster system she would give up almost instantly. as for 1st possibility, if this was the case then it must, at all costs, become very explicit, that fact must be said with all letters not hidden.

[@danmijs8383]

seems funny this AI can analyze deep chess moves but on 15:49 'knight exchanges...' huh??? 🤔😅😃 ... isn't that rook exchanges. I guess it's a human annotating.

[@1bootyaa]

cant believe you lost to a girl!!

[@chandranisahanone]

It's not real stockfish bruh and lella is a weak chess bot! Who is running this yt channel creates some attention of peoples who love this type of videos! The real stockfish engine is so powerful that it can defeat every chessbot if they all team up

[@GeorgeEpting]

Don't flatter self to much stocky for she taught you something about yourself which is you can always learn something about you when you lose and thats when you find out what you already had but miss placed a thought miss understood and that picture of her doesnt look as pretty as before but I'll leave this one for you, for when you realize your experience is greater than your looks and you find out being pretty is something in a moment that your character can express😊bye bye happy machine n

[@chandranisahanone]

Lella=🤡 Stockfish=💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

[@xxplaymusic_game8823]

Hikaru is nothing 😂😂

[@GünayAvcı-s3d]

İstediğim parayı topla😊

[@linoangulo3597]

Habla Español

[@mabrand2999]

5. f4 .... not leela's choice 10. f5 .... not leela's choice 14. Bxf6 ... not leela's choice 36. c3 .... not leela's choice 41. Qf6 .... not leela's choice 64. Qa3+ .... not leela's choice 65. Qd6+ .... not leela's choice 72. Kh5 .... not leela's choice

[@1bootyaa]

jk gg

[@brucea9871]

I really wish you would eliminate the nonstop chatter. It would be very annoying to have to listen to that motormouth "Stockfish" rambling on endlessly the entire video. I say "would be" because I find it so annoying that I stop watching within 30 seconds. This is the third video of yours I started to watch but soon stopped due to "Stockfish" being unable to shut up. A comment once in a while would be okay but not rambling on continuously pointing out every little detail. I won't bother watching any more of your videos.

[@gordonwhalley2461]

the analysis of various black options is critical to understanding the correctness of white's play. If a little unrelated chatter by Stockfish accompanies it, is that a good enough reason to not learn some brilliant strategic ideas?

[@brucea9871]

@gordonwhalley2461 It was not a LITTLE unrelated chatter; it was a LOT. And judging by the low quality of the chatter I did hear (which provided nothing of value except to complete beginners) I doubt there would be any brilliant strategic ideas revealed.

[@123ARES]

Ce te oprește să-l pui pe ... mute? // What's stopping you from putting it on ... quiet?

[@brucea9871]

@123ARES Of course I considered that. But then I would miss any explanation of moves that were more difficult to understand (assuming they provided explanations of those moves). It would be simpler if the commentary was restricted to such moves rather than explaining every single small detail of every single move. That is overkill.

[@oxiigen]

I agree. It's annoying. Annoying voice. Annoying 'jokes'. And overall annoying. Totally annoying.