Nice one Daniel! Cool to see the small props in the top working so well to simulate the gas thrusters. It will be interesting to see how grid fins would work with this design, if you choose to test them. Just a shame these mini quad motors/props hate to be ducted. I think the setup I used was measured at 1.5kg of thrust, but could only just lift the 400g 'rocket' at full throttle. Look forward to the next one!!
@rctestflight6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Tom! And thanks for the inspiration! My next design uses a gimbaling motor on the top for attitude control, but I would like to experiment with grid fins/thruster motors again in the future. The duct inefficiency is indeed a bummer. I might try a profile body with my next one. Won't look amazing but oh well.
@RCLoversan6 жыл бұрын
Ducting those propellers is not a great idea, because the motor loses a lot of thrust. Using this design you can't even add a proper solid fuel model rocket engine. As a result, you create something that is definitely not a rocket. Please take a look at my Rocket Drone... ready to be 3D printed (having some funds).
@Specter04206 жыл бұрын
Did you guys ever consider using a proper Electric Ducted Fan? I know they are heavier, require more RPMs, and may provide less static thrust than a naked prop but, you are putting a prop in a tube on an electric motor. That is what they are designed for. Something the size you will need is 3D printable. There is plenty online about making them. Incorporating a proper airfoil duct could help with natural stability too.
@RCLoversan6 жыл бұрын
@@Specter0420 Being a "rocket" (even if in this case there isn't any combustion of its content), I believe that keeping an eye on weight, should be a priority. Therefore, the ducted fan motors are not the best choise (in my humble opinion).
@rctestflight6 жыл бұрын
@@Specter0420 I think there would still be a large efficiency loss from sucking a ton of air through a tube with lots of drag in it (batteries, servos, wires, structure, etc).
@Chevan20086 жыл бұрын
You definetelly one of the best RC-engineering pioneer on the youtube!!
@TobiasLeininger6 жыл бұрын
The pioneering work has been done by flight control software programmers during the last 15 years ... now it's easy to just use that.
@lavenderfox24306 жыл бұрын
Go look up Peter Stripol.
@heyitsmejm47925 жыл бұрын
@Pretty fly for a WiFi NO U
@amachalaamachalpu93663 жыл бұрын
it still just a multirotor with beta flight nothing special
@MrLiquimatter6 жыл бұрын
Lol, Clipped in a space X crash with your sound!
@redsquirrelftw6 жыл бұрын
That was great lol.
@dylanw.45335 жыл бұрын
I’ve watched it 15 times
@Bermudakid5 жыл бұрын
Should launch it with two solid stage model boosters on the side. Then recover it landing!
@jwtfpv89576 жыл бұрын
Try retractable landing gear for the next one. :)
@privatebubba88766 жыл бұрын
Static landing gear to save weight.
@luongmaihunggia6 жыл бұрын
*Tom Staton wants to know your location*
@merxellus14566 жыл бұрын
BPS too
@janeEriley Жыл бұрын
Park City, UT
@harryhathaway10866 жыл бұрын
What a brain. I messed around with RC when I was younger but I do not have the mentality or brains to do stuff like this guy. A huge sums up for your ingenuity👍
@thesnitch76 жыл бұрын
It’s facinating ? To hear someone talk ? In the form of questions ? All the time ? Fun project as usual!
@rahul538854 жыл бұрын
This is by far the best self landing homemade rocket I've seen
@ronbradshaw74044 жыл бұрын
Out of everyone trying to do this cheaply and nicely, you are the one my money was on!. Daniel could fly a Juke Box if he wanted to!.
@AngelBeats-KPISАй бұрын
Interesting aircraft, you completed what i wanted to have when daydreaming😂
@JakeBiddlecome6 жыл бұрын
This is the most stable prop 'rocket' i've seen yet. At first I thought there must be a string running up through the tube in the first trials. Really nice work.
@bobhawkey37834 жыл бұрын
Just a thought - and trust me, I have no idea what I'm talking about - what if you had a threaded rod with a weight on it that could be moved up and down to change the cg just by spinning the rod. This stuff is so cool. Love your videos, great work.
@augurelite6 жыл бұрын
VERY COOL! what is this warehouse youre in btw?
@Randomname1836 жыл бұрын
Where are you working? Looks like a cool place!
@MrZomhad6 жыл бұрын
Think he works at Freeflight (indeed looks freaking cool!)
@lukekimble7156 жыл бұрын
I lost this channel and just found it again. Avoiding the same mistake by remembering to subscribe! Any time I'm having an engineering "writer's block" of sorts, I come here. Always innovative, always inspiring. Keep the content coming, the buffet line's only getting longer.
@mccc45596 жыл бұрын
You're a little older now than years ago when I first started learning from your wisdom, but I am still very proud of you as all your viewers should be.
@AtlantaTerry6 жыл бұрын
Why would a person's age matter?
@mccc45596 жыл бұрын
@@AtlantaTerry My apologies.....it was not my intention to make it an "age thing." I received your message and read my comment again......now it is obvious how my original comment can be misunderstood. Please allow me to explain for my sake and out of respect for you. You see, I've been fortunate to have been learning from this young man since he was just a young boy. Over the years he has matured into quite a gentleman with an incredible future. My message above was meant as a compliment (for example "I am proud of you) but I didn't want to make it sound like I am writing to a little boy....so I stated "you're older...." The point is that I should have clarified and written something along the lines of "you have aged quickly yet gracefully over the years with such wisdom and sincerity....if I say I am proud of you then it is intended in a very mature way" instead of when you say it to a very young person...where it is intended more as a "good job kiddo".....I hope this clarified things a little for you.....maybe you're his dad or uncle or relative..... I hope you will reply.
@scottsarchitecturehildebra17612 жыл бұрын
Absolutely fantastic, thanks!!!
@AClarke20076 жыл бұрын
Try having two thrust motors in the Tube (one at each end), but at the top use Ducts to control the vacuum entering. Similar to having Thrusters, just in reverse (hopefully, no one will notice the direction of air). Possibly use compressed air too, initially, to save on Battery. Also, make a shroud out of thin batteries to go around the main tube.
@NickRehmcontent6 жыл бұрын
Oh my god I was hoping you would show the old yellow thing hahahaha. It's crazy how far you've come and that you're still goofing off. I must say I spent a lot of my early RC years trying to keep up with you and the crazy shit you did like that giant cargo plane or the delta yak
@NickRehmcontent6 жыл бұрын
Also, you may want to consider skinning a frame with some door screen type material and painting over that. You still get the looks but probably get about twice the airflow into the motors
@findmeinhawaii47824 жыл бұрын
Great effort and attempts! If you don't mind me being a critic and offering some suggestions here are my thoughts. I think most of the power (a lot) should come from the top of the rocket as if you were pulling an umbrella by its tip upward. Let the bottom sort of dangle with less power during flight. Just enough for control and balance to keep it steady. But upon landing and your approach to the ground, use the bottom engines at full power to cushion and reduce the speed of the fall to a soft landing. Good luck! Aloha Ken
@stevenclarke8045 жыл бұрын
Ive been watching you make and fly stuff for many years, you are a smart young man, its refreshing to see young minds working, and experimenting, and having fun with Imagineering, keep it up you'll go far in life!
@ballwizz236 жыл бұрын
First time I've ever subscribed to a channel after just one video.
@doverivermedia39372 жыл бұрын
Fantastic 👏 project ! Thank you for sharing. The next might be an autonomous floating raft for it out on the lake ? Haha. 🇬🇧
@M4T1J4P06 жыл бұрын
Oh my gawd, fingers and open props, moving so fast, sooo cloooose. Great rocket and video.
@David.-_-4 жыл бұрын
This guy is legit. Love it
@MarkHahn6 жыл бұрын
Very cool video. Some ppl dont understand the technical challenges here. Awesome! Kinda gives you a view into the future of RC capabilities.
@lasersbee6 жыл бұрын
Great results... That's the best flying R/C Rocket attempt I've seen to date.
@ericdamexican6 жыл бұрын
Yes please! More of this intriguing project!!
@prathameshkalaskar92506 жыл бұрын
It is different than other youtubers........
@patrickmccrum97066 жыл бұрын
Be Creative extremely unique
@valeriyproklov46046 жыл бұрын
Check out BPS. Space
@VTOLKits4 жыл бұрын
Great project! Thumb up!
@andreferro46184 жыл бұрын
You have my respect! Greetings from Brazil.
@Skydive4ever6 жыл бұрын
Cool 'rocket' Daniel, you never cease to amaze me :-) Funny you mentionned your older video, that is the first thing I thought while i was watching the video, it reminded me of that old design :-)
@ricansurf6 жыл бұрын
Very ingenious! I think you are almost ready for a rocket launch!
@crickettgreen26706 жыл бұрын
I know you don't want to hear this but you're freaking awesome I mean seriously what you've accomplished here is amazing I can see a bright future ahead for you and drone technology of this sort
@Resteasy86863 жыл бұрын
So dope. I had no clue you did something like this in the past! I'm suprised it doesn't have more views.
@jaycustom21796 жыл бұрын
Watch out for this dude in the future. The next rocket Genius....
@birdseyeview15436 жыл бұрын
I daresay it worked a bit better than Tom's version, very well done sir!
@AddyOverbeeke5 жыл бұрын
Try replacing the prop/motors with EDFs that have outlet nozzle flush to the outside diameter of the fuselage and inlet ducts flush-mounted with openings in the nose cone. You could also use a gyro to stabilize the flight, not the sensor gyros but and actual gyro that has mass enough to keep the fuselage fixed once up to speed before take-off.
@dmartinnj6 жыл бұрын
maybe a smaller nose cone in diameter to allow more air inside might help. Very cool idea though, good luck with it dude :)
@Benth3rdoneth4t6 жыл бұрын
You should make a hybrid rocket next. Make it go up using an E or G size model rocket motor, and come down using the stabilizing propellers with an A size model rocket motor to slow it down :)
@pdtech45246 жыл бұрын
Nice work! Next stop, The Moon!! 👍😁😎 I fly quadcopters so I can completely understand your passion! 👍😎
@OldCaliboy6 жыл бұрын
You have earned a new subscribers today my friend. If it's not to much weight on top try deploying the control vanes as you descend back to earth. Great work .
@alanmcrae85946 жыл бұрын
Nice build! Enjoyed watching her fly.
@davidebo71514 жыл бұрын
Seeing the rocket without the nosecone remind me of SNs 5 & 6 150m hop. Great content! Subbed.
@BobSchmidty4 жыл бұрын
I love it. RC has come a long way in the past 30 years. It's truly amazing!
@autisticguitar6666 жыл бұрын
This is the rctestflight I subscribed to a few years ago.
@AlymerKiteboy4 жыл бұрын
That workshop!!! 😳😍
@FarmerFpv11 ай бұрын
Daniel, IDK if you will see this comment now. But I think you should revisit this making it much bigger with some crazy power that is available right now. It would be sick! Maybe with a counter-rotating duel motor thrust setup and make the body out of a plastic mesh just for aesthetics?
@LEGOBubuS6 жыл бұрын
Well done, best hovering quad Space-X thingy!
@Project-Air6 жыл бұрын
Awesome project Daniel. Interesting to hear about your experiences with the body shroud inefficiencies.
@jeffreyjuliano28356 жыл бұрын
9:00 minutes
@valderja6 жыл бұрын
Great project. Interesting challenge to overcome. Elon would be proud.
@macrumpton6 жыл бұрын
Very nice. Perhaps you could make ribs like a boat cover the whole thing in a very wide mesh fabric which would allow the air resistance for controlled falling (and from a distance look pretty solid), but allow air to come to the prop through the whole body.
@pagani86 жыл бұрын
amazing work as always
@frankschannel26424 жыл бұрын
What an interesting project. Congrats!
@JakubJurzak4 жыл бұрын
What FC and soft do you use? Ardupilota or betaflight?
@QuickCookie6 жыл бұрын
The snow geese in the background are beautiful!
@MyProjectsTV4 жыл бұрын
Hahaha the overlayed SpaceX Video at 12:53 is so funny xD
@MikeAlano3 жыл бұрын
Daniel is the best kind of nerd that I want to be friends with for the rest of my life
@Siamect6 жыл бұрын
With two flight controllers, how do you deal with the i-term? It would normally go plus on one controller and minus on the other thereby fighting each other. I-gain zero on one of them?
@aliali-st4ye6 жыл бұрын
Nice I dreamed of this and I wanted to do it but I did not have the equipment. Thank you. You are wonderful . It is a nice feeling to find someone who has similar ideas ^-^
@Jeffe46M6 жыл бұрын
I love watching your project videos... you truly are a mad RC scientist haha
@justanotherguy4695 жыл бұрын
Dude is that your house? Nice! Its a mad scientist dream home.
@gilperon6 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Simply amazing. Congrats!
@denismoran6704 жыл бұрын
brilliant! You are really getting the hang of it, with fewer 'goes' than Spacex!
@NickSmith-hv9zi4 жыл бұрын
I would put rocket fins. Wouldn't do much but at least I'll look more like a rocket. Very well done. Congrats..
@FlyingBuzzard6 жыл бұрын
That is awesome.....just gets better and better Daniel
@danw19556 жыл бұрын
I think it would be to your advantage to have ducts for the top stabilizer fans and the intakes for the lower fan, as they would direct the air a lot more efficiently to the fans, rather than just simple cutouts to let the air in. I think you're getting a lot of internal turbulence in the tube that's messing with the overall airflow, using just simple cutouts. If you could lay out something on your computer and then 3D print them, you could fashion the ducts however you wanted. Also if you had ducted fans to start with, to put within the tubes, it would exponentially increase the efficiency. Just a thought. Neat project!!😉👍
@harshavardhan21685 жыл бұрын
Buld spaceshuttle style virtical takoff and glide back safely..or simply tilt rotor crafts...you are dam good at these builds.
@CradyLab6 жыл бұрын
That is seriously awesome! Did you have to make any mods to the iNAV code? BTW, your location looks like Woodinville - for some reason I thought you were in Park City, UT
@markgiles85276 жыл бұрын
I've never experience "Really Unstable" control of my drones when landing, but okay. Interesting project you have going there. Think long and hard about some ideas on how to use this, you could be on a winner here. Good job! ;)
@ohutchie3 жыл бұрын
Damn dude it's crazy how similar this looks to the Starship hops!
@TurboSunShine6 жыл бұрын
Nice! Any chance of seeing you use a ducted fan in the next video?
@rctestflight6 жыл бұрын
No chance. I think putting a duct fan in the rocket body will still have the same efficiency loss as putting a prop in there
@droneredneck1705 жыл бұрын
Awesome stuff man! Now just put a 1st stage rocket on that baby and some fpv gear. Rocket to a few thousand feet, separate the 1st stage (with parachute recovery system) and Fpv your invention home!!😁😁😁😬😬👍👍
@Unitedstatesian6 жыл бұрын
Awesome Project! Maybe ditch the outer shell, make a very narrow shell that covers what is needed. Also, instead of the top motors and batteries add fins for some control. The big body will also be more affected by winds. It can be very windy at high altitude (even if it is calm on the ground). That way you can have all the battery weight go towards the bottom motor. I think that with the fins and having the weight a little lower it will be easier to control. Maybe have the width of the fuselage be just big enough to house a Gopro and phone for tracking. Fins will also help slow down and control return without the motor. Also remember that as you go up it gets very cold, the batteries will need to be protected.
@jedijeremy6 жыл бұрын
Sweet! Nicely done, Daniel! If I may offer a suggestion: instead of the 3D printed "solid" nose cone, perhaps if you have two flat pieces of foamboard slotted together in an "X" that would give you the side-profile of a nose-cone that you clearly want for verisimilitude, but would allow a lot more air to get through and reduce weight compared to the plastic. I wish I could draw a diagram, I hope you get what I mean.
@Coltan19895 жыл бұрын
@rctestflight @9:40 - When you are talking about the case that body impacts the performance. It's most likely due to the propeller being designed with a shallow pitch, and probably needed something more aggressive. Also you could have increase the number of blades to create a static pressure behind the propeller.
@19rocket646 жыл бұрын
Fantastic stability..cool to see it correcting for torque n p-factor
@CradyLab6 жыл бұрын
What about using ducts for the top 4 props to get the air cleanly out of the shell
@Crazyoldman846 жыл бұрын
Awesome idea and very well done on actually making it work👍
@dylanhealy44733 жыл бұрын
How'd you learn all the intricacies with the electronics & working with PCB Boards
@mattfranks43356 жыл бұрын
Flying cars can't be too far off now . You build one !!! Yeah come on flying car next please .
@randalltufts33216 жыл бұрын
If Elon musk doesn't snap you up soon he's missing the boat. Daniel keep building, keep learning, keep reaching for the stars. The only thing that can keep you from living your dreams is you. Best of luck buddy. A future so bright, you'll have to wear 👓........
@thrakiamaria6 жыл бұрын
Great performance 👍
@EcoSpeeder6 жыл бұрын
---Brilliant work.
@parkflyerindonesia6 жыл бұрын
You're a genius, dude! Kudos! 👍👍👍👍👍
@t.b.a.r.r.o.6 жыл бұрын
Nice. Seems really durable!
@edlomonaco6 жыл бұрын
At 7:20 when it is descending you can hear the differential in thrust needed to bring it to the ground smoothly, one thing that is lacking in the space x footage. It appears the thrust doesn't change until the last 10 feet or some b.s.
@toddanonymous52954 жыл бұрын
NASA will be calling this lad
@hugh_jasso4 жыл бұрын
What if you replaced the 4 smaller vector motors with a single motor + vanes?
@Droning-ON6 жыл бұрын
This is very strange, but very cool!!
@OldCaliboy5 жыл бұрын
i just got a matekf411-wind fc board and was wondering if you can do a config settings video of your set up. What was your mixing setting to get the servos to function the way yours do? Thanks for your awesome work.
@TheXJ125 жыл бұрын
Suggestion : shouldn't air inlets be round like trumpets on race car carbs (or turbine inlet) and outlets sharp as trailing edges ?
@theecstatic96865 жыл бұрын
Fukkin genius man...I would if I could add a flywheel assist launch base station to the project for max altitude...plus battery regen during descend...
@QImpact6 жыл бұрын
Very nice test flight. Looking forward to seeing you test out grid fins (hint, hint). What would be really interesting to see is a conventional chemical first stage, and then landing with your thruster motor.
@brundlefly36586 жыл бұрын
What propeller size are you using for the main motor on the bottom? @13:38 that propeller looks really tiny! Is that a 3 inch Prop? Put a 5 Inch Tri blade on and run it on a 4S 850mah lipo!
@MODESTMOUSE896 жыл бұрын
If you loose the cone on the top it would have more efficiency. Awesome work, looking forward to 2.0!
@PPGGORILLA6 жыл бұрын
You are smart man. I've watched your videos for several years, Now I'm a sub.