truly amazing how you explained 2 views on psychology I have been struggling with for days in less than 4 minutes, thanks! :-D
@PsychExamReview6 жыл бұрын
No problem, glad to hear that it was helpful!
@clarenceoliveriii4 жыл бұрын
Yo fr, I’m about to do a pop quiz and he summed this up better than many professors💪🏽💯🙏🏽🔥thanks!
@nessasnursingdiaries50183 жыл бұрын
@@clarenceoliveriii is this acceptable knowledge at university level
@clarenceoliveriii3 жыл бұрын
@@nessasnursingdiaries5018 Mann, sadly I don’t think so but these institutions just allow professors to waste time instead of getting to the point clearly
@karmaav32734 жыл бұрын
Understandable and useful for freshman student like me taking up BA Psychology. Thank you. Keep uploading.
@PsychExamReview4 жыл бұрын
Glad it's useful, best of luck in your studies and let me know if you have any questions!
@syamilysasi86773 жыл бұрын
I have just begun learning psychology formally and these words are completely unfamiliar and confusing for me. But by watching this video, i could really grasp the concept clearly! Nicely done,very informative.. thank you so much sir!
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome, glad it was helpful!
@babynamz4 жыл бұрын
took my prof 20 slides to explain this and this vid took 3 mins with better explanation :))
@PsychExamReview4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@leilaniahkoi5 жыл бұрын
Mahalo for simplifying thesis two terms for me. I feel much more confident going to take my quiz today.
@PsychExamReview5 жыл бұрын
You're welcome, good luck on your quiz!
@despacitokcm1986 Жыл бұрын
Young teacher, brevity and clarity are ur hallmarks. Cannot be better explained. Thanks a lot...I too am a novice at psychology and had been struggling to get things into me. But u opened up a whole new dimension to learning and understanding! Well done sir..
@PsychExamReview Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that, hope you keep learning and improving!
@brianwallace6112 Жыл бұрын
Came for the linguistics (the Skinner and Chomsky vid) and stayed for the psychology, perception, etc. You're an excellent presenter.
@PsychExamReview Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Nicole-wo5nb3 жыл бұрын
I have been stuck with this since day 1 of my class and your explanation is the only one that I actually understand. I was starting to think that I was too dumb to not get it after watching several crash courses. Thank you so much
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@margaretcunningham7146 Жыл бұрын
I'm in the same boat, but a year after you!! I've a notebook full of terms that I need definitions of and I'm only on module one!!!
@agg43004 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the thorough explanation of this. I read my History and Systems book and it just did not make sense to me. I get it now! Thank you again.
@PsychExamReview4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@sanguine_viper35313 жыл бұрын
Your explanation was soooo good, sir. Better than the wall of text crap I read everywhere and i could not understand. God I love you
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@melisaamorales2 жыл бұрын
thank you for this video! it helped me so much. i was having a lot of difficulty understanding both for the past week and your explanation was perfectly clear and understandable:)
@PsychExamReview2 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear it was helpful for you!
@emblagsk Жыл бұрын
you're explaining in a great way ! I actually understand this now. Thank you!
@PsychExamReview Жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@patricegrant70365 жыл бұрын
wow you just made my presentation perfect! Because now i understand!
@sankhayanbhaumik64524 жыл бұрын
The way you explain it is really fantastic.....Thank you so much......
@umenk36372 жыл бұрын
this just saved me honestly thank u so much
@PsychExamReview2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@joshthesage70933 жыл бұрын
Fuck yeah~~~ that was my reaction to experiencing this video, your content, the way you explain things and write them down after explaining the key concepts is invaluable!!! It is truly helpful :) Thank you.
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@sanaabelhimer26757 жыл бұрын
How did Darwin's theory influenced William in specific and functionalism in general?
@PsychExamReview7 жыл бұрын
Hi Sanaa, William James referred to Darwin's work regularly in his writing on a number of topics. In general, functionalism was about understanding the purpose for particular traits and evolutionary theory provided an explanation for how those purposeful traits would have been selected for over time.
@sanaabelhimer26757 жыл бұрын
+PsychExamReview Thank you
@aichaakachab2451 Жыл бұрын
Structuralism I believe was established by Edward Titchner. Wilhelm Wundt established the first formal lab for research in Psychology.
@PsychExamReview Жыл бұрын
You're correct that Titchener played an important role in formalizing structuralism and developing techniques for introspection. This was based on his work with Wundt, his translations of Wundt's works, as well as his own research at Cornell.
@ajmarr56714 жыл бұрын
Functionalism: The principle that form follows function (as in evolutionary psychology) rather than function following form (as in learning theory, affective neuroscience), thus arriving at principles that are formal but not functional, and psychological principles that are true to form, dysfunctional. from Dr. Mezmer’s Dictionary of Bad Psychology
@Carlos-oi3tj Жыл бұрын
thank you this helped me
@PsychExamReview Жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that
@matthewrichey27275 жыл бұрын
If structuralism and functionalism have since faded, why are they still relevant to psychology today?
@PsychExamReview5 жыл бұрын
Great question! I think that learning about these early approaches can serve two purposes beyond just being historical trivia. The first is that they can show us which approaches didn't quite work as well as planned and we can better understand why these needed to be modified (this should also help keep us humble, as we can clearly see how even brilliant minds of the past have erred). The second is that we can see how things that did work have been adopted and incorporated into modern approaches and this can help us to better understand these approaches and where they came from.
@matthewrichey27275 жыл бұрын
@@PsychExamReview Thank you!
@PsychExamReview5 жыл бұрын
@@matthewrichey2727 You're welcome!
@saraostadi76062 жыл бұрын
You are a LIFESAVER! thank you so much!
@PsychExamReview2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@mayankmehta27132 жыл бұрын
You are really doing great work!
@PsychExamReview2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@zulakhabegum46675 жыл бұрын
Please Upload a video on extra sensory perception (esp)
@shubhankar62835 жыл бұрын
Add on to this video about Gestalt, Behavioural, Psychodynamic and Humanistic approaches.
@PsychExamReview5 жыл бұрын
Hi, I didn't describe these approaches in this unit because they are each addressed in more detail in future units. Here's a few related videos that might be helpful for understanding each of these approaches: Gestalt: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqLUppiVf6-Fg9E Behaviorism: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2e0pGN3r5eUq5Y Psychoanalytic & Psychodynamic: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qoOnhp-umJuJetk kzbin.info/www/bejne/faPNe6ysg9WEaas Humanistic: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gWSQh3Zji61na6M I hope this helps!
@dystopesia4 жыл бұрын
The problem with structuralism wasn't that it was too subjective, on the contrary; it was too objective. Wilhelm Wundt tried to quantify behavior into physiological patterns
@PsychExamReview4 жыл бұрын
This is a good point and it's true that Wundt wanted to make psychology more scientific and objective. Perhaps the larger problem was trying to make the leap from studies of things like reaction time and visual perception to understanding consciousness.
@chaemomileeee3 жыл бұрын
hey can you elaborate on this, i quite do not understand what you have just said. thank you :)
@amirmuizzudinmohddin1663 жыл бұрын
thank you sir for the good explanation, i very appreciate your video
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@MysticMel903 жыл бұрын
Hey love your channel!!... do you have any videos on behaviorism and John B Watson or B.F Skinner and or any videos on psychoanalysis and Sigmund Freud
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that! You can find a full playlist on learning theory and behaviorism here: kzbin.info/aero/PLkKvotUGCyLdWmS-YBp58DTmjN3Q9nih0 as well as several videos about Freud at the start of this playlist on personality: kzbin.info/aero/PLkKvotUGCyLe8owpX2t0RMSbOEzCoY7hG
@Matterful2 жыл бұрын
Hi Michael. Is there a recommendation you could give me to read about the development of these approaches throughout the 20th century? Thanks for the summary!
@PsychExamReview2 жыл бұрын
Sure, this excellent resource site has a number of original papers organized by topic if you want to read more: psychclassics.yorku.ca/topic.htm
@Matterful2 жыл бұрын
@@PsychExamReview Thanks Michael!
@sadibouchra6863 жыл бұрын
This is So helpful thankkk U a bunch U saved My life!!
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@starsandmoon8553 жыл бұрын
What was the criticism on the structuralism and functionalism.
@baxtermoonga91453 жыл бұрын
Thank you it was helpful
@olin_13 ай бұрын
Amazing
@h.m16534 жыл бұрын
Mr.Michael Corayer teaches you how to be a good teacher *-*
@kentong95143 жыл бұрын
What is the structure of the mind? what are the components of the mind?
@rebeccajones85553 жыл бұрын
thank you for this!
@Mikeoldyo3 жыл бұрын
A pretty long question here, how is asking the participants to describe an experience when exposed to a stimulus through introspection correlated to "breaking the consciousness down into manageable parts to analyze"? What are the "parts" here? Would anymore care to enlighten please?
@tiyakashash41223 жыл бұрын
hello, i asked my psych professor and he said that wilhelm wundut basically wanted to break down and analyse different parts of the brain as to how chemists break down elements and understand the chemical compounds which relates to the approach of structuralism. i hope this helps:)
@Nafraz3 жыл бұрын
well explained
@cobbbytv40534 жыл бұрын
That’s perfect ❤️
@karlasilva75224 жыл бұрын
This is truly so helpful, you explained them both so clearly
@PsychExamReview4 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that, thanks for commenting!
@Duncain-Data-Boy4 жыл бұрын
Describe functionalism and structuralism and their influences on behaviorism and cognitive psychology. help out
@aditipaul29063 жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir!!
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@evanzack21423 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@mariebryche78323 жыл бұрын
if i pass my exam i'll say it's because of u
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
The credit will be yours for putting in the time studying, best of luck!
@mariebryche78323 жыл бұрын
@@PsychExamReview update: i passed ! Needed 50% to pass and I diiiiddddd !! :) thank you very much ✨
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
@@mariebryche7832 That's great, congratulations!
@idreessayed1655 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir 👍
@PsychExamReview5 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@rohanbhalerao24954 жыл бұрын
will u pl. Explain with one more example
@PsychExamReview4 жыл бұрын
Sure, another way you could think of the difference between structuralism and functionalism would be to think about an emotion like fear. A structuralist approach would focus more on the elements of the mind that are involved in the experience of fear, while a functionalist approach would focus more on how fear serves a purpose by having an effect on behavior.
@rohanbhalerao24954 жыл бұрын
@@PsychExamReview thanks
@terrielovingood48523 жыл бұрын
@@PsychExamReview Boom. It just clicked for me with that example. Really hating this current course. It feels like they were seriously overthinking back then. 😂. Thank you!
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
@@terrielovingood4852 You're welcome!
@sanyasingh53893 жыл бұрын
was freud a structuralist or a functionalist?
@PsychExamReview3 жыл бұрын
I don't think Freud fits into either category particularly well. In some ways his approach to identifying parts of the conscious/unconscious mind could be seen as similar to a structuralist approach, though his emphasis on resulting behavioral effects and explaining why symptoms were occurring and how they could be treated (even if incorrect) could be seen as a bit more pragmatic/functionalist.
@GummBo34 жыл бұрын
Wilhelm Wundt wasn't a structuralist tho, He openly denied reduction and atomism. Also a different common misconception you mention about him was that the used introspection often. It was a small part of his research, he rarely used it in fact. Titchener a seperate psychologist said he learned introspection from Wundt and was a structuralist is the reason for this misconception. READ INTO IT
@PsychExamReview4 жыл бұрын
You're correct that Edward Titchener was a greater advocate of a structuralist approach and also used introspection to a greater degree in trying to identify elements of consciousness so I should have mentioned him in this video. He also brought Wundt's ideas to the US and translated his early work, though perhaps in a way that was more in line with Titchener's own views. I'd also add that both Wundt and Titchener were critical of "naive introspection" and believed that subjects needed training in order to be able to provide useful introspective reports, which I also could have clarified a bit here. Thanks for commenting!
@nadrey224 жыл бұрын
Hello! May I have a copy of the reading you've mentioned? I'm interested to know more about that. Thank you!
@GummBo34 жыл бұрын
@@nadrey22 A Conceptual History of Psychology after John D. Greenwood
@nadrey224 жыл бұрын
@@GummBo3 thank you!
@aysemelikeagirman81434 жыл бұрын
OMG this helped me a lot thank youu
@aloatelia3091 Жыл бұрын
Wundt was not a structuralist.His student Tichener was
@PsychExamReview Жыл бұрын
You're right that things are actually a little more complicated. Titchener translated a lot of Wundt's work and brought it to the US and this may have led to Wundt being seen as more of a structuralist than he actually was. Thanks for commenting!
@carlgustavjung13433 жыл бұрын
seninle şu konuların üzerinden bir geçelim tatlı çocuk.
@rutvikmakwana89735 жыл бұрын
It's Williams James
@draidichirine16452 жыл бұрын
you are sweet i understand everything
@BarelyManaging2 жыл бұрын
No disrespect but you look like an off brand Ben Barnes. God bless for saving my ass.