STRV-103 IS THE BEST tAnK DeStRoYeR EvEr :) (War Thunder )

​In the market for War Thunder Equipment? Use this link to get 3% off your entire purchase and a custom Phly emblem for your vehicles. goo.gl/4xJbSH
Merch STORE LINK - teespring.com/stores/phlydaily
STRV-103 IS THE BEST tAnK DeStRoYeR EvEr :) (War Thunder )
LiveSTREAM LINK - / phlydaily
Connect With me!! In a more sensual way :)
Support la PHLEE - / phlydaily
Follow me on Twitter!-- / phlydaily
My Instagram - phlygram?h...
JOIN my DISCORD - / discord
Follow me on Myspace!--tinyurl.com/2fcpre6\

[@PhlyDaily]

Best Tank Destroyer

[@Chris-iy6du]

KV-2 in10. 0 now

[@tinyterror593]

Sorry im gonna do it, Its not a TD, its an MBT

[@eliaslundstedt5607]

iTs An MbT!

[@XxCarrt3rxX]

It’s a fekin mbt

[@wonderland3801]

In real life this tank can go 50km/h and reverse too...not just 30

[@grusarn3995]

Did you just insult the magnificent swedish tank building Edit: Gijin really need to improve hull aiming Edit2: yes it is smooth irl

[@Arthion]

Kinda sad really since iirc the Strv 103 actually aims perfectly smoothly in hull aiming mode in WoT by comparison.

[@shmekelfreckles8157]

Caeric tbf in WoT you need to switch into your suspension mode and you can barely move then. But it still feels very nice.

[@ridge9066]

Caeric yes but is that realistic. I’d think it wouldn’t be as smooth as a turret control.

[@Arthion]

@@ridge9066 Perhaps not 100% but it certainly wasn't as "jerky" as the controls are in WT. It has pretty superb fine adjustment thanks to its dual engine setup with the diesel more optimised for slow, preciser maneuvers.

[@Daniel-jg8ff]

They need to fix the reloadtime also. In wartime conditions it were able to fire 30 rounds/minute but it wore out the barrel faster. During training/peacetime it had a rate of fire of 3 rounds/sec. The hullaim on the real tank is/were incredible smooth and precise and the gun itself were extremely accurat.

[@bluegamer308]

I like how Gajin has implemented a vehicle that shows how bad their game engine handles driving models.

[@heattap8991]

Yeap

[@ComasGhost]

Shut up wot lover

[@AveragePootis]

@@ComasGhost The hell are you on?

[@radonsider9692]

@@AveragePootis he is just a gayjin fanboy and accuses us with being supporters of shitgaming

[@AveragePootis]

@@radonsider9692 Yeah... i dont really know how the brain of a children works sometimes

[@granpatrotski4154]

I love how it shits out the rounds after you fire

[@cursedcliff7562]

The t62 n543 or whatever also does it

[@lemonmuffin4990]

Yes

[@fox_fpv]

How do i unsee this

[@DraconiusDragora]

@@fox_fpv You don't, now remember the real deal, can fire quicker, and has an Autoloader, that made it have a really quick shit storm behind =P

[@politicallyinaccuratetoast4757]

Makes sense, the gun is longer than the entire fucking hull

[@florian2199]

Well the Swedish were quite pragmatic, the development went like "-the turret is the most hited part of the tank, let's get rid of it! - And let's fix the gun to the chassis, like that we can make an effective autoloader! -And to aim? -Let's move all the tank, even for elevation!" also they don't have a lot of cities to fight in, and if they do, it's means that the Soviets already won

[@Arthion]

Pretty much, trying to fight any potential threat to Sweden in conventional warfare was pretty much deemed idiotic as we'd never have the numbers to compete against the USSR (or the Yanks should we somehow end up on the opposite side) so the focus was completely on unconventional warfare using terrain and mobility to basically play guerilla warfare to the max.

[@mr.jancok4413]

@@Arthion 6

[@mr.jancok4413]

@@Arthion 9

[@SonsOfLorgar]

@@Arthion and obscene ammounts of 155mm self propelled (Bkan 1) and semi-self propelled (Haub 77) arillery. And 120mm mortars

[@azmanabdula]

@Jas. Strong-Oak Just fix the cannon on choke points, hit and run ey

[@felixlillieskold8040]

The story behind the “Strv 103 series”! Sweden knew it would never go on the offensive and therefore created one of history’s best defense plans if war were to break out. The whole plan with the 103 was to peak a hill, fire some shots and then run away, this system made so that the enemies would never know where the 103 were to peak next and therefore would not be able to plan an attack with over 60% rate of success. Later versions of the 103 were also equipped with a huge shovel/digging-blade which not only provided additional armor but also gave the tank the option to dig itself down making it almost impossible to spot the 103. This was and still is one of the best tank systems ever made!

[@Rikard_Nilsson]

the 103B had one digging blade per platoon, when they made the C version all of them was equipped with one.

[@DrLoverLover]

So some kind of airborne IR would beat it? Soviets had that

[@ostwind7031]

Sweden

[@Edo_Ginting]

This, along with Swedish air power would be a nightmare to deal with

[@zarpp9411]

Bra anpassad för Skåne.

[@teph1256]

this vehicule showcase very well how disgusting transmission and ground traverse are in war thunder. it has been bad from day 1, and it's incredible just how difficult it is to traverse a tank in this game

[@jammygamer8961]

Yea its really bad. Its honestly put me off this vehicle. If they had it work properly like in WOT i would buy it

[@infiniti7773]

That's because the engine was built for airplane combat, hence there being no actual physics like tank collision or suspension.

[@marcosalvarez7096]

since the patch, the VT1-2 does also perform bad, the nieed to fix it because it is literraly unplayable

[@joten70]

i tried driving the s-tank with the steering mapped to my joystick, and it is SOOOOO much smoother. Too bad i cant find a way to bind the suspension to the joystick though :/

[@madman_24]

@@marcosalvarez7096 Speaking of VT1-2, try switching to secondary gun and aim. You'll experience not being to able to change the gun's elevation, same thing goes for italian R3 T106

[@Finngolian]

"now the BMP is dangerous that will screw our whole entire day up" "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

[@farisimran5361]

I just laughed really hard at that phart

[@UrMe666]

Faris Imran how tf do you spell “phart” went theres literally auto correct 👁👄👁

[@farisimran5361]

@@UrMe666 I guess i disabled the auto correct? Or it might be that I'm just phreaking good at it...;)

[@krustykrew106]

Had a stroke reading this “that will that will screw our while entire day up”

[@panzerdespenser9030]

The aiming is supposed to be fixed because the creator said he WANTS it fixed

[@informitas0117]

It is fixed, but it's supposed to be smooth as the whole tank is built to be. It looked very smooth when I saw it drive in the Arsenalen tank museum

[@codemy666]

@@informitas0117 It's not fixed, it's just as bad as it was in the dev stream

[@panzerdespenser9030]

@@informitas0117 I'm talking about how it is in game, I can see how you misunderstood what I said

[@Dumbrarere]

Phly: *calls it the STRV* Sweden: "It's Stridsvagn, you [insert expletive here]"

[@Felix-ko8gv]

[dumskalle] ?

[@takumifujiwara5679]

N word

[@jefferybauduin2919]

Wow so funny

[@ramslade]

Andrew Manson "its stridsvagn, you dork"

[@lolcatize12]

Basically '' DET ÄR EN STRIDSVAGN HUNDRATRE DITT JÄVLA PUNDHUVE!!''

[@aflay5006]

One of the best Wilhelm screams I've ever heard at 4:11. 10/10 video

[@raultrincado7110]

Strv: 303mm... 4sec reload Conqueror: 360mm... *20sec reload* Gaijin pls

[@FMHikari]

Yet the chieftain doesn't have that much time for a reload. Must be the 2 stage ammo, idk.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

Strv 103 has a 40 round dual magazine autoloader, the Conqueror has 2 piece ammo all over the place with a manual loader... Quit whining.

[@raultrincado7110]

Yet war thunder is not a simulator, imo the relation damage-reload for the conqueror make the tank unenjoyable.

[@raultrincado7110]

Also, it was a joke

[@onelyone6976]

Plus a 20k repair bill if you happen to die

[@peng6151]

Bushes on this would be disgustingly scary

[@stareg7453]

Don't Give Them Ideas!

[@kezhap5242]

Bro, why

[@limaTheNoob]

did you mean OP and cancerous?

[@jasonscott7077]

Iv been grinding cash/event at 6.7 brits... ALL you see is strv's. They have already adapted bushes... Sad times.

[@GrowlingRB24]

Well the C variant have a pivot chaft (giggity) so it can burrow down in the woods and other terrain, making the tank almost invisible. And with a dedicated backwards driver that can go as fast backwards as forwards, your in for a scooting shooting time!

[@pwa7287]

Is no one gonna talk about the fact that this thing can be played with only one crew member alive?

[@anapaulaabreu2995]

Too op

[@DutchManticore]

@@anapaulaabreu2995 well a real Strv 103 was also combat operative with 1 crewmember

[@crunchycarter957]

Phly: Bmp will screw my day Bomb: Let me introduce my self

[@cozmin1424]

STRV in WoT: One of the most accurate TDs in game, and smooth aiming STRV in WT: Damn what a lag 😂

[@gamingwolffox7121]

4:05 bmp is dangous that wil screw our whole day up Bomb: I about to ends this mans whole career

[@FullSemiAuto357]

2:50 Phly has officially lost his shit this time.

[@excaliburmkii1573]

Me and my buddies have been running the Strv 103, and we have come up with the nickname "The Angular Swedish Boy" : Edit - I believe the reason the aiming chop has to do with the transmission not being modeled correctly. Snail models it after a clutch driven transmission, where the Strv had "The transmission consists of a Bofors three-step automatic main gearbox with forward and reverse function in bevel gear. Steering is a regenerative double-differential system with a hydrostatic steering device, and is accomplished by handlebars on the tiller columns." I would argue part of the reason the aiming is so choppy is that as the engines rev up the incorrectly modeled transmission has to switch gears like a normal manual, compared to the Bofors automatic gearbox. If anything here sounds incorrect feel free to let me know :)

[@SonsOfLorgar]

Sounds very likely

[@I-02]

Cheese Wedge, Support Wedge, Doorstop, etc.

[@cnlbenmc]

I like "Swedish Pancake Tank"

[@lol500000]

No, the hull aiming system is just junk, you can see it on the VT1-2 as well.

[@ridge9066]

Was there a difference between the prototype and the production model?

[@Miragexe]

When Sweden already has a better 7.3 lineup than Germany and fights against 6.7 Germany half the time that literally cannot killed it.

[@theabstract100]

Germany in 6.7 is cancer anyway, always uptiered and many times alone (maybe with italy or japan, but that doesnt help) against all. The new leKPZ helps a bit but cant change the outcome of these matches -.- But with that one you can kill the swedish tank at least, if you are lucky...

[@Brandon_J]

Mirage German 6.7 is decent. It’s one of my favourite lineups. With the 262, Tiger II, Jagdtiger (bit obsolete) and the Panther II and the 10.5cm Tiger II. It’s a great lineup, people just like to complain because they can’t play German tanks properly. If they’re played right, they rack up kills and win easily, but most players rush into the caps and get themselves killed.

[@Miragexe]

@@Brandon_J Tanks arent the problem.

[@Brandon_J]

Mirage i know. Thats what I’m trying to say. Most 6.7 German tankers seem to think their tanks are invincible, so they play them like they are. Which gets them all killed.

[@Miragexe]

@@Brandon_J Either way people complain and say they lose because they always snipe or dont snipe enough, cant win either way

[@focke-wulfta1526]

4:10 When you’re peeing and it makes two streams

[@suselek990]

Omg i thought i was retarded by having this problem Nice to see other people in the same situation

[@neurofiedyamato8763]

lmao, I rarely have that issue. Its usually caused by temporary blockage. Ahem clean yo thing. Or it could be a more serious medical issue if it happens regularly and consistently for long periods of time. So... AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Indeed.

[@suselek990]

@@neurofiedyamato8763 Also rarely but it happens And it is caused by skin that is covering "that thing"

[@empire-classfirenationbatt2691]

This comment thread is beautiful

[@focke-wulfta1526]

flodA reltiH that’s what I was saying. I didn’t know my comment would lead to such a discussion 😂

[@NolDragon]

This thing is the perfect ramp for an italian lunchbox to jump from.

[@windydreams4780]

"Is this the strongest SABOT at 7.3?" >checks Freeaboos ... *cries in Conqueror and Cent MK. 10*

[@mikaelskarp1422]

stalinium dosen't stand a chance agianst melted meatballs

[@SonsOfLorgar]

Just as intended.

[@Hexapoda.Resident]

Meatballium!

[@mikaelskarp1422]

@@Hexapoda.Resident yes!

[@SonsOfLorgar]

@ger du don't reveal our secret weapons you damn traitor ;) /s

[@Teodor1891]

Irl this tank can dig itself down Into the ground. Tilt it forward with an plow attachment and it can dig a hole. Everything under the gun is under ground. Swedish strategies is defence. Hide the tank from the tracks and down and put some branches on top and its impossible to detekt

[@HorusGodEmperor]

Exactly this, Sweden were only planning on fighting a defensive war against the Soviet Union, their intention was to dig in!

[@ridge9066]

Wow that’s cool

[@johan-erikjohannesson2796]

As stated by someone working for the Swedish defence material acquisition Agency (FMV), that in the early 90s a T-72 testfired against a Strv 103 with the bars equipped and the round (BM22/23) went through the bars AND the Strv 103.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

Yup, and that's one of the main reasons we retired it.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

@ger du if the politicians hadn't sold them as scrap for less than the metal value in a single road wheel, they could have been retrofitted as amphibious ground combat drones/TDs now that the sensor and remote control hardware has been sufficiently miniaturized and reliable enough to handle the circumstances. Alas, that was not to be.

[@PeTTs0n88]

The amount of decent 105mm rounds this thing can put out in a short amount of time is just beautiful. And scary.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

And realistic... Oh, and we built an SPG on an extended version of this tank chassi, it has an autoloader too. That one has it's magasine loaded with giant clips. Fourteen 155mm one-piece rounds to a clip. One clip to a standard EU cargo pallet. Six pallets to an ammo truck flatbed with crane. 2minutes to refill a spent magazine with one clip. 45 seconds to fire all 14 rounds out to 25km from one Bandkanon 1A. 4 SPGs to a squadron.

[@Jeeters87]

"Someday the Strv 103 will be fixed" is going to be written on my tombstone. World of Tanks did it better.

[@SougoUltimateSadist]

4months, nothing has been fixed, recieved a nerf instead. so yeah Gaijin!!

[@Kay_213_]

Still pretty crappy last I checked

[@leonardoamaro8778]

Bruh

[@Mirvra]

Over a year later... Still, not, fucking, fixed...

[@disregardtheconstabulary1276]

Did a extra effort report on it a month or so back. "LOL no, we'll just add another premium heli to ussr or smth xaxa"

[@noir2559]

Later version of 103s will have 50mm UP armor in front and anti-HEAT slat armor in front of it.

[@dixievfd55]

"This Tiger's kinda screwed." He was screwed the moment he clicked Battle.

[@Pimpdaddy_payne]

And that’s exactly why I play Arcade I like to know what I’m going against

[@Gustav_Kuriga]

@@Pimpdaddy_payne You like being shot from across the map by people who can't actually see you? ugh

[@Pimpdaddy_payne]

Gustav Kuriga where did you get that from?

[@Gustav_Kuriga]

@@Pimpdaddy_payne In arcade you can see people through any amount of foliage via their names.

[@Pimpdaddy_payne]

Gustav Kuriga, I don’t really mind it, it’s part of the game admittedly a stupid part but at least I can actually see said person, and the br range I play at 6.7 to 7.3 I know that is at least 1-2 t95/t28 sniping at long range so I’d much rather be killed through about 3 bushes rather then give said t95/28 the satisfaction of sniping me from long distance. I play low tier realistic though 5.7 to 3.0

[@Wuzzup129]

Phly's censor sound is the best on KZbin.

[@divinesan7786]

4:11 that scream though. Aiming should be smooth like you see in WoT .

[@9dissection9]

As a Swede I've waited so long for this one. A bit difficult to learn with the aiming, however after a while you learn.. Love it!

[@dragoonTT]

The jumping turtle

[@ZETH_27]

The aiming in game is way to sloppy, In real trials the tank managed to hit almost the exact same point 2 times and turned the hole from the first shell into an oval with the second. The accuracy from the Strv is really god but Gaijin made it really, really bad.

[@Username3141519]

The Strv is the best. Read all about it and I became a hell of a fan. Swedish design is amazing.

[@Maximilian7992]

Sergeant Edwin I have the VT-1 and it’s pretty difficult, especially since it has two guns

[@9dissection9]

@@ZETH_27 Yeah, probably a balancing feauture. I mean once you learn to play it, it can be really good at its BR. :)

[@acrienteangelic1862]

Realistically, you don't push a button or something to activate the hydraulics, driver can actively work the hydros by twisting a knob that's integral to his driving "yolk" and turning it side to side is steering. Personally I think WoT got it right with their control setup for the tank as in real life you have much more fine adjustment for traversing whereas a mouse & keyboard/controller are much too coarse by comparison. Watch Nicolas Moran's video of "Inside the Chieftain's Hatch" for the Strv 103C, i think he details exactly this point.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

No... WoT fucked it up by adding the siege mode as a push-button that takes time instead of just making it an automatic change based on movement speed. Eg: it should switch seamlessly and instantly on as the tank slows down to sneak up a hill and off when you push the pedal to the metal trying to GTFO regardless if going backwards or forwards.

[@acrienteangelic1862]

@@SonsOfLorgar What I mean is the WoT version the tank auto tracks your point of aim instead of you manually turning the tank and gun only tracking elevation. The delay is dumb, yes, but it's there for their own balancing reasons as WoT is more arcade style than WT.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

@@acrienteangelic1862 thanks for the clarification :)

[@wwvvvvvww]

You've got it wrong. The S-tank is also using pure mouse-aim in WT, the only problem is that it's sluggish.

[@ridge9066]

This is the prototype. Was it the same as the 103C?

[@skiingcrocodile2153]

I remember in World of Tanks tanks that had a fixed gun could be aimed by just using the mouse, and the Hull would move with it when you were aiming without having to use the movement controls. Is that not possibile in War thunder with this tank? Seems strange it was a good feature, that was chooooooppy

[@dubu_5129]

I think that it’s possible in war thunder because when I tried out this tank I had mouse aim where the hull would follow where I pointed( booth horizontally and vertically) and I think it was on by default because I haven’t change the controls for hull aiming before. The thing is that when you drove the tank, the hull would follow. So if you looked right, left, up or down with your mouse the tank would face the same direction and you would drive that way. But nevertheless the aim was MUCH smother with mouse aim.

[@uncleruckus4124]

skiing crocodile, yes you could, but hull aiming is quite new to war thunder so it may be a bug.

[@rm2569]

This is whats happening here but it is very choppy.

[@challenger3603]

@@dubu_5129 If you bind the hull aiming to a key you drive around in "road travel" mode. Also there is a return to "center" button for better road travel. The tank aims better when you enter the hull aiming mode. Also the tank needs to be on semi-level ground for the best aiming other wise the scope bounces like crazy.

[@johnderouen1038]

@jason nordstrom Honestly, WoT's portrayal of the Strv 103 and other hull-aiming vehicles is probably more realistic than WT's because the aiming actually works. You can see in Phly's vid how funky and imprecise the aiming is with the Strv, but in WoT it works almost exactly like every other vehicle - as it should. The UK and US conducted a study in the 1960s as to how well the Strv 103 could engage a target compared to the Chieftain or the M60 and found that the vehicle's design presented no inherent problems except a small (approximately half-second) increase to aim time. The Swedish system was capable of getting results every bit as accurate as a turreted tank despite its unconventional design, and in that respect WoT has WT beat.

[@michaeld2622]

I can't stop laughing when you were screaming! Thanks for making my day! :D

[@PhantomTangeant]

1:25 this short commentary made my evening hahaha

[@texasdeeslinglead2401]

Aim adjusted with sledgehammer by gunner . Ping ping ping . "Ready! "

[@djswx]

Phly, how about we honor the emperor once again and we bring out the J7W1 with 4 sake bottle launchers You haven't played it since 2014. Attempt #77

[@jonnyfodaw7282]

you sure are persistent...i usually give up around the fourth try xD

[@miskapiska2188]

He is prob bussy with the new vehicle's

[@davidhonfi2683]

Never give up mate, we'll make it one day:)

[@InternetSurfer19]

I know from the Chieftain's Vid on the Strv 103 that it apparently is pretty smooth to aim due to the short track contact length. I'm not sure about this model that's in game but in theory it's overdone in game.

[@01ahmadhachem77]

4:10 PHLY YOU INDEPENDENT WOMAN 😂😂

[@randomcast3183]

I died laughing at that part.

[@01ahmadhachem77]

Random Cast who wouldn’t my god 😂😂😂

[@shadowolf_8319]

*Phly* "Say with me" *Me* " No armor is best armor" *Phly* "Because...." *Me* "Oh... Ok" :(

[@goldy_ag4578]

4:05 : Everthing is gonna be okay ... 4:11 : *aaAAH AAAAAAH !*

[@michealcrowe3425]

Phlopywapy you always make my days better. Love seeing your videos!

[@guilec06]

4:10 i’m so much wondering which face you were doing xD 😂

[@watch-box]

Yet another premium vehicle which seems powerful for its br when first going on sale.......a more suspicious person may think this is done on purpose to make more sales 🤔

[@asiftalpur3758]

Not a suspicious person, but a person with 3 working braincells can reach that conclusion.

[@_Cyph3r_.]

it's classified as an MBT by the swedes because it was used in their military doctrine like an MBT, but in war thunder context it is a tank destroyer. Stridsvagn can be translated to german as Kampfpanzer or in English as MBT showing the Swedish classification as such because the Swedes used all their MBTs primarily as defensive tanks. You could also compare it to the role of the challenger series which is also designed primarily as a defensive tank because of the lighter hull armour and the strong turret armour. The challenger and the Strv 103 are best-played defensively on medium to long distances, but both can also be pushed in closer combat but have a high disadvantage by doing so. In other words, you could argue that the lines between tank destroyer and MBT somewhat blur in the case of these Tanks. But those are just my thoughts about this topic.

[@jgripen969]

Or as i like to call it: kampfwagen :D

[@erikakurosaka3734]

Is it used like a Tank destroyer? since the time it took to align your gun to your target either in turreted or non-turreted AFVs are pretty much the same lol Also the role of the Stridsvagn 103 is more to Defensive offense or some shit

[@SgtStinger]

No, our tank battalions primary job was to repel and then counter-attack the invasion force at the beech head. Thus, the tank was made for counter-offensive combat too. It worked because turret stabilization systems weren't able to fire accurately on the move at the time. This meant that tanks stopped when they were going to fire anyway. The STRV 103 had quick turning time and a fast working hydraulic system, and it was combined with the laser preselected targeting system controlled by and independent optic in the commanders station, meaning that the 103 could go from spotting a target to putting effective shells down range faster than almost any other contemporary tank.

[@_Cyph3r_.]

@@SgtStinger I'm from Austria and I don't know the details of Swedish doctrine, so thanks for clarifying. I just think the Strv 103 is such a cool and unique tank design that I just have to love it :D

[@Bialy_1]

@@SgtStinger Phly objection that it is bad for a city is just silly, every tank that is moving into city is asking for rain of molotov coctails and/or RPG shower...

[@KDSRirelandboy1]

"Apparently this is a-hah, this is a Main Battle Tank. Yeah Okay. Have fun with that. Go drive it down a BRRT urban street, what the BRRRRRT" I can't believe this happened lmao, best PG statement on youtube EVER.

[@avbiker]

I was dieing hahaha 😆

[@anabelladelpilar6734]

4:10 I can't stop laughing

[@DirtyMardi]

Last time I was this early, Finland was still part of Sweden. Speaking of which, pls Phly, try out the Pyörremyrsky. I wanna hear you try to pronounce it. ^^

[@nadtz]

The aiming on that thing was supposed to have been some of the best before stabilized guns,, it would seem that part got lost in the translating to the game.

[@noir8945]

7:35 - i dont play ULQ (in fact i play on maximum except -> ), but Particle Density should be lowered to minimal by every player, because on certain maps like Sinai its just neckbreaking.

[@dunkin254]

Ahhh just delightful, Gaijin. Now I can keep the door open without having to hold it.

[@thedogpresident6782]

4:38 yes! gaijin did it more sloppy

[@xavy13sniper49]

4:11 that is the sound of pure terror 😂

[@MotorStorm]

4:10 I completely lost it there 🤣

[@andrewroberts6344]

Wat thunders reason for removing vehicles is they didn’t fit any BR. So... what do they do? Add a vehicle which at 7.3-7.7 is completely op when facing 6.7 and below, but if this thing was at br 8.0 APFSDS would render it useless hmmmm

[@KardasheviteUltravisionary]

Don't forget its Premium status!

[@Mamiya645]

Gun Carrier and early Churchills. OP downtiered, depressing uptiered. Let's remove them!

[@010SFAZZ]

@@Mamiya645 I prefer a Churchill at that thing

[@stefannesic1495]

Actually, I checked it out in the armor viewer and it can bounce a surprising amount of apfsds. And the ones that do pen don't usually reach the crew. Only the top rounds actually killed crew members. Now I will admit that I didn't test every round out there, but I think I can say that its armor would still hold up at higher BRs

[@shmekelfreckles8157]

Stefan Nešić what APFSDS did you check? Even AUBL at 8.0 with it’s tiny round easily pens this thing head on and the round literally goes through the entire tank and goes out of the back. I’m not even talking about anything bigger.

[@StrikerV3]

My God. They did the aiming right in world of tanks 😂

[@niklasohlsson5473]

It is a main battle tank, but it was used as a tank destroyer. It wasnt the only MBT in Sweden.

[@Hackwild217]

That scream when the bomb dropped was funny af

[@dodoproductions8532]

The tank is smooth IRL, war thunder just don't seem to get that ;)

[@Dstryr-vf8sp]

It is a very sophisticated mbt but the swedes who created it realy saw it as an mbt that's no joke or anything for them it was a normal tank

[@hiddengnome]

The artillery crew thanks you for letting them take a tea break :D

[@Mamiya645]

Wacked a lot of 103s from the front today, and not only with ATGM. Two tried o angle to safety while repairing the transmission weakspot, and in one match two tried their best to keep my M901 down but I was not showing anything but the very tip with launchers and optics so they had no chance, especially lacking explosives. It's fine at 7.3 but I want to see what it's like when they fix the aiming.

[@Mamiya645]

@Ian Goschman If the 103 does its best job at facing you: Anything high explosive on cupolas / Aiming at the intersection between upper and lower plate / Lower plate if possible at all / Taking the gun out / Passing shells through the forward lumps (gunpod etc) to send into the rear fuel and set it on fire. If the 103 has the thick pay2win bushes covering the sensitive parts, good luck. Hate those..

[@chineseambassador7565]

What's your favorite tank? Everyone: Abrams, leopard, t90 etc Me, an intellectual: Swedish cheese slice

[@The_big_chungus70]

russians must love this tank cause it do too much squats

[@SonsOfLorgar]

That's why Soviet never dared to invade in the cold war, they knew they would have too many conscripts defecting as they were awed by the squatting tanks

[@ZETH_27]

The tank was made specifically to shoot at Russians.

[@The_big_chungus70]

@@ZETH_27 ew

[@bieloruskii]

@@ZETH_27 T-7000 will be created to shoot a whole planet lol

[@n1jrm]

MERRY CHRISTMAS old man , best to you both,and GOD bless you

[@-di-johnson6706]

The other apds round has better penetration on angles and is found on the late m60s

[@MagicOstridge]

He meant at br 7.3. Confused me when he said that at first too

[@asiftalpur3758]

Ur mom is found on the late M60s hehe

[@The_big_chungus70]

phly is not phlying anymore he is *groovin'*

[@nomercyjeffc]

Great Vid Phly :)

[@ApokalyptikNM]

that bmp is really dangerous it will screw my entire day up phly: see's bomb, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

[@pacocinco]

Gaijin needs to improve the aiming system.

[@Malignant88]

Once they've sold enough, it'll get nerfed so bad.

[@lol500000]

Yep, its heading to 7.7 or 8.0 real soon

[@johnyguitar258]

good cant wait

[@bigrk.a.n.p4010]

4:10 I’m literally crying right now😂😂😂😂

[@dukeofwar1003]

The anti-strv in the game at the moment is the pulkzerstörer. And let me tell you, it's fun shooting the back ammo compartment with it

[@WoooshProductions]

4:11 we’ll be right back

[@AxiomIndustries]

The strv 103 weighs 314167 bananas

[@farmazoniarz]

Good job how much its it in 0.5 l vodkas?

[@farmazoniarz]

Or in meatballs

[@AxiomIndustries]

@@farmazoniarz approximately 664903 meatballs

[@punisherxomega7308]

World of Tanks did the smooth factor a bit better on the Strv's track traverse while aiming and shooting.

[@5co756]

wow that sparks look awesome , i like that .

[@filipm8961]

its not even suppose to fight outside of sweden.....

[@adampustos1155]

Last time I was this early, the Berlin Wall still stood.

[@ancientwarrior3482]

@@mekhane.broken9678 you mean rollin' in the streets of warsaw?

[@theworldoverheavan560]

@@mekhane.broken9678 lol

[@socanukincrazy9060]

oh I have loads of fun with this tank .. best purchase choice i made only other tank i've bough was Ru 251.. I see lots of people playing it as sniper but I play it very aggressive .. rush in and face enemy tanks .. people don't know how to deal with it. I think that choppy and unstable aiming is kinda shitty but i think that compensates for its survivability. I rather have that choppy aiming than moving it up a BR because apfsds just punches though it like hot knife through butter which negates the ides of the very slopped armor.. then it becomes useless.

[@Ace01010]

Best tank in the game, best looking tank I've seen! saw this tank from a meme and feel in love "Shoot me all you wish, My Armor is too smooth. The smoothest there is, your shells simply slide right off"

[@patcab3279]

Play the aml90 please :)

[@Hagmire]

Using a tank built in 1965 vs a tank built in 1944... sKiLlEd

[@bluntcabbage6042]

Tanks are placed at their BRs based on their performance, not their date of introduction. This has been the case for years.

[@90AlmostFamous]

Blunt .Cabbage then why they don’t put it in their respective year just as a starting point ? It’s money making fiasco really and nothing About balance

[@sparkling925]

@@90AlmostFamous what are you even saying

[@90AlmostFamous]

@@sparkling925 i meant since this tank is new in the game, there's no valid data to keep it in any BR. So, why not let the default be the date of introduction of the tank in real life.

[@sparkling925]

@@90AlmostFamous oh i see well they could use the dev server but nobody takes that seriously so i see your point

[@dmitrysgamecorner3928]

Stridsvagn -- battle car in Swedish -- 103 series tank is a highly capable Main Battle Tank (MBT) in a 43-ton package, The Strv 103, or S tank as it is also known, is the first practical turretless MBT to be developed. The low profile makes the Strv 103 very difficult to see when on the move and almost impossible to find when lying hull-down in ambush.

[@artilleryfire6576]

battle wagon*

[@dmitrysgamecorner3928]

@@artilleryfire6576 yeah or that

[@dmitrysgamecorner3928]

+ i like how Phly doesn`t acknowledge that the Strf 103 is a mbt even tho it is since it served with the Swedish armed forces for around 30 years and was one of the moast advanced tanks at that time,

[@bruh-jv8qd]

4:10 I love that part lol

[@tomasz9429]

"One dev server is enough, guys! Trust us!" - Gaijin every time.

[@Cavemanjenkins]

hmmm

[@ryanlanca9927]

Phlyman, you really need to get into watching the Inside the Chieftain's Hatch videos and the Military History Visualized videos. Chieftain has a great vid with a tour and history of this tank.

[@ryxtan]

It might be a pain in the ass to aim with, but I love my Ikea doorstop. The repair cost is nonexistent and it makes a fantastic moneymaker. The short reload also allows for some incredible multikill potential if you position it well.

[@windclans]

I also would like to point out that that tank is slower then what it should be. the STRV is actually very nippy able to cruse around 65 kph forwards AND backwards

[@wesha3953]

When you litterally drive a wedge in their lines.

[@UmbrellaXR]

Notification squad! Happy holidays Phly!!

[@Sh-epard]

4:10 Dat scream...perfection.

[@jgripen969]

Problem with the aiming part is that the tank crew didn’t use A and D on a keyboard to aim lol. Maybe you could change the controls to turn left- right with the mouse?

[@bluntcabbage6042]

Hull aiming is a mechanic in-game that allows the vehicle to move by following the mouse but it's incredibly choppy and unreliable.

[@jgripen969]

Blunt .Cabbage Well look at that. Maybe I should’ve looked stuff up first. So it’s just Gaijin being lazy i guess.

[@miraak542]

This tank in World of Tanks is a phucking monster. The aiming is so disgustingly smooth. GayJerk EnTwatAnus just doesn't know how to code.

[@ronanvave560]

Phly: Oh yeah Mr Krabs! Me: *Screams at the top of my lungs*

[@corathus]

Loving the unloved please Phly I-16 type 10 Preferably with some historical information

[@thegoat8489]

MBT FOR GODS SAKE!