A good reason to use large diaphragm condenser microphones.

  Рет қаралды 11,598

Randy Rektor

Randy Rektor

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 9
@illicitivy
@illicitivy 5 ай бұрын
Super helpful! Thank you!❤
@chayn6664
@chayn6664 6 ай бұрын
That’s pretty impressive ❤
@Germy-mf7cg
@Germy-mf7cg 6 ай бұрын
Cool
@OctaviusGeorge
@OctaviusGeorge 5 ай бұрын
Interesting
@andriibudim
@andriibudim 6 ай бұрын
Though in your previous video of comparing mkh-50 which is small pencil condenser vs AKGP420 which is large diaphragm - you came to conclusion that AKGP420 was more detailed, punchy and sharp vs more natural mkh50. So, I guess its not necessarily always the case, you are mentioning here, right?
@randyrektor
@randyrektor 6 ай бұрын
Ahh yes, so a couple of things to touch on here. It's important to note that accuracy and apparent brightness in the top end are two different things. While the P420 feels bright -I believe I said "The P420 has more bite and may be a little more shrill", the MKH50 is still a MUCH more accurate reproduction of the sound. The main point is that SDCs are generally far more accurate in the way they capture sound, whereas LDCs have much more distortion, sometimes good, sometimes bad. Check out the Earthworks reference mics. They have tiny little diaphragms and are known for being the closest to a flat response. Super cool tech!
@andriibudim
@andriibudim 6 ай бұрын
@@randyrektor wow, I checked earthworks mics and they are... strange at least to those who are seeing them first time. Why I'm asking cause I'm trying to understand actually do i need to buy LDC mic, cause I already bought mkh50 and it sounds amazing and warm to my ears. But with LDC does it brings actually more details or as you've mentioned - its just more distortion (and kind of individual eq of the mic)? For instance JZ11 mic. Maaan, there are so many nuances to the sound, trying to wrap my head around it. Thanks for explanation! appreciate it
@randyrektor
@randyrektor 6 ай бұрын
@@andriibudim Yeah so generally LDCs capture less detailed information. Each mic still has it's own nuances. Some may be brighter, some darker, some punchier, etc. But generally speaking, SDCs capture sound more accurately because of the speed of the diaphragm. All this to say, the MKH50 is an amazing tool. I'd try out some LDCs if you're interested and use your ears to see what's right for you. It's really the only way to know. Hope this helps!
@RealSash1997
@RealSash1997 6 ай бұрын
Wow
Dynamic vs Condenser Microphones | What's The Difference?
7:11
Audio University
Рет қаралды 485 М.
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
How to treat Acne💉
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 108 МЛН
How To Create A Podcast for Beginners
14:28
Think Media
Рет қаралды 582 М.
Dynamic vs Condenser Microphones, What's the Difference?
5:17
Podcastage
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
GATOR CASE FOR LINE 6 HELIX FLOOR : Ghelixfloor
4:25
aceman42
Рет қаралды 447
Can You Beat Minecraft if the Whole World is Water?
16:07
EnderSkull
Рет қаралды 292 М.
HOW TO USE YOUR ANDROID PHONE AS A CAMERA MONITOR
7:25
DIY Video Studio
Рет қаралды 227 М.
Audio-Technica AT4040 Condenser Mic Review / Test
5:26
Podcastage
Рет қаралды 167 М.
M4 vs M4 Pro Mac mini buying guide (2025): DON’T MAKE THIS MISTAKE!
10:41
Mark Ellis Reviews
Рет қаралды 53 М.
Learn this Pedal Steel Lick on Telecaster
1:03
LG Guitar Channel
Рет қаралды 1,8 М.
NOT the same! Microphone Gain vs Sensitivity
4:52
Randy Rektor
Рет қаралды 867
How to Make Your Guitar Sound Like a Pedal Steel
4:03
Joshua's Guitar
Рет қаралды 1 М.
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН