Supreme Court issues major ruling on First Amendment in social media case

Fox News' Shannon Bream and Fox News contributors Jonathan Turley and Andy McCarthy break down the latest Supreme Court opinion and what it means for the Biden administration during 'America's Newsroom.' #FoxNews
Subscribe to Fox News! bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: www.foxnewsgo.com/
FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour all-encompassing news service delivering breaking news as well as political and business news. The number one network in cable, FNC has been the most-watched television news channel for 18 consecutive years. According to a 2020 Brand Keys Consumer Loyalty Engagement Index report, FOX News is the top brand in the country for morning and evening news coverage. A 2019 Suffolk University poll named FOX News as the most trusted source for television news or commentary, while a 2019 Brand Keys Emotion Engagement Analysis survey found that FOX News was the most trusted cable news brand. A 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey also found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News was the top-cited outlet. Owned by FOX Corporation, FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape, routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.
Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: www.foxnews.com/video/shows/t...
Special Report with Bret Baier: www.foxnews.com/video/shows/s...
Jesse Watters Primetime: www.foxnews.com/video/shows/j...
Hannity: www.foxnews.com/video/shows/h...
The Ingraham Angle: www.foxnews.com/video/shows/i...
Gutfeld!: www.foxnews.com/video/shows/g...
Fox News @ Night: www.foxnews.com/video/shows/f...
Follow Fox News on Facebook: / foxnews
Follow Fox News on Twitter: / foxnews
Follow Fox News on Instagram: / foxnews

[@andrewschnatter4338]

Having your constitutional rights infringed by a social media company on behalf of the federal government isn't injury? It injured every single person in the country ffs

[@PurdyScaryProductions]

Social media is a 3rd party platform. You sign away your freedom of speech when you make your account. Try and keep up.

[@drzaius1121]

​@@PurdyScaryProductions if it's third party the white house should stay off it and try to tell the truth. Try to keep up.

[@terrencekane8203]

Without lies, what else can scumbag Trump possibly post?

[@erenyeager8306]

@@drzaius1121 their comment still stands.

[@markovichglass]

Its tyranny and the founding fathers wrote in safegaurds against this type of over reach. We need to abolish it and institute new government.

[@brianpevehouse1150]

Such a cop out! Do your job, Supreme Court! ⚖️

[@Dont.Call.Me.Tall.]

Yesssss. Ban more 50 year rights so Alex Jones can make fun of more parents of dead children. 🤤

[@heathernks8]

They did. They issued a ruling. Just bc you don't agree with their ruling, doesn't mean that they didn't show up, put on the black dress, ( /s) and issue a decision. You sound like Trump, thinking that SCOTUS'S job entails issuing rulings that you agree with. Sorry, that just isn't reality. Where can I get some of that sweet, sweet, delulu you're laboring under?🤣

[@RedonkulousCaptious]

@@heathernks8 I hope an illegal gets you.

[@mrakronyahoo]

Too many fake conservatives. Trump was fooled

[@Donner906]

keep crying. snowflake

[@RaysDad]

When the Supreme Court refuses to protect the Constitution we are in big trouble.

[@DeviantDork]

Hahahahahaha That's funny that you think free speech is posting on social media. 😅 lol you stupid

[@DevilTravels]

True. But what does that have to do with this case? This is just giving the government a voice on business run social media.

[@mikehall6912]

@@DevilTravels Not even close. the government has every right to dispute what you say, they have zero right to prevent you from saying it...directly or by proxy

[@DevilTravels]

@@mikehall6912 The government isn't the one removing posts on social media, the private business social media company is. The government makes the request, just like you can...if you have compelling reasons.

[@Mrshuck2]

​@@mikehall6912Freedom of speech.

[@timzello3948]

Horrible for free speech. America has fallen.

[@timothylopez8572]

Tell that to the freaking FCC (federal Christian conformity)

[@FosterTravis1071]

Got something against Christianity, shillhole?​@@timothylopez8572

[@InsaneCajunsUnleash]

She hasn't fallen, just tripped.

[@joshb2228]

Its private companies. Not the government.

[@diegojines-us9pc]

free speech. fox lost 787M for freely lying, trump lost 90M for freely lying, rudy lost for lying mu pillow guy lost for lying so its free to say, but what you say will cost you if you make it up.

[@jebbohanan2626]

SOCIAL MEDIA DOES NOT ALLOW “FREE SPEECH”. Except when it’s in their best interests.

[@josephgriffin2388]

NOT their "best interests"....the majority of social media is overwhelmingly liberal. As long as commenters hold the liberal line THEY WON'T BE SHADOWBANNED.

[@bobwoods1302]

"I never gave anyone hell I only told them the truth and they thought it was hell" - Harry Truman

[@michaelmartinez9622]

MAGA wants to take away your Free Speech 😮

[@tommygunnz450]

I get strikes every time you say something bad about the left. It's a joke for them to say there is free speech on the Internet

[@mattt5006]

I can’t even ask if Biden will be asked questions about the border on Thursday. Censored every time.

[@daisuke6072]

Cover up as usual, they are a disgrace. It's a further weakening of first amendment rights.

[@smorris281]

I bet the SCOTUS are your hero’s when they rule the way you want though, right. They can’t please everyone.

[@tobybigham4196]

It is giving the government the ability to regulate Journalism and Social Media. This is how authoritarian governments get the power to take over.

[@DevilTravels]

Cover up? No, this is quite the opposite. It's uncovering misinformation.

[@mattt5006]

Socialist media is more like it.

[@larsongramckow7495]

No it's not

[@rh5971]

Then no one can ever sue them! What a complete BS ruling!!! All Americans were all harmed by this and they decide that they don't have STANDING? OUTRAGIOUS!!!!

[@gabereal420]

How are we harmed by taking down disinformation again I would prefer less lies online

[@diegojines-us9pc]

fox lied, 787M trump lied cost him 90M, so say it if you wish to pay for it,

[@markovichglass]

That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

[@mattt5006]

The founders told us about a time like this.

[@iZbooo]

This is Trump’s SCOTUS… 😂

[@maidenminnesota1]

Who is threatening the SCOTUS? That's the only thing I can see from where I'm sitting.

[@heathernks8]

So, a split decision doesn't mean that a split court couldn't reach a consensus, but rather that there MUST be something sinister going on. I think I now understand the MAGA crowd fully. Logic, reality, and critical thinking skills have left the building. Further. When the guy from the squad lost his primary, he was mocked by Fox for blaming others. But that's literally what y'all do Every TIME smthg doesn't go your way as well😅

[@jeanstrickland2445]

@@heathernks8That’s rich coming from someone that evidently doesn’t understand that both sides have refused to accept the results of the court’s ruling on many occasions 🫤

[@AustinKoleCarlisle]

the same countries who paid off congress and the senate.

[@sanusiebarrie7225]

Israel

[@ryanbird6226]

@@heathernks8 you are a pathetic bot. stop talking like you have some moral high ground as you fail at every single turn in every topic. why is a convicted felon ahead of biden in every single poll? you should be trying to figure that out sweet heat :P

[@jesusisalive3227]

What is going on with the Supreme Court? This is wrong!

[@RUSHisRIGHT09]

They want Trump to win the election.

[@mrakronyahoo]

Too many fake conservatives there. Trump made big mistakes in his appointments

[@Donner906]

keep crying

[@user-ew6jy9mo4r]

It’s not wrong. The Supreme Court only rules on law. Cases have to be setup a certain way to be ruled on. This case was amateur hour from the beginning. Reactionary, not strategic. Another, similar case -brought by an educated team- will get resolved.

[@laurenfazenbaker9777]

Epstein frequent fliers...particularly Roberts....

[@InsaneCajunsUnleash]

Wouldn't it take a class action lawsuit from "We the people" to create "Standing?"

[@bt1169]

No

[@rainman6080]

It needs to be argued on the merits the justices kicked the can down the road.

[@youarewrong57]

@@rainman6080false. You can’t get to the merits of the case if you have no standing. That’s the entire point. If they wanted to kick the can down the road they would’ve never picked up the case to begin with. The US Supreme Court selects every case they hear. It was a failure on the lawyers part to make sure their client actually was ‘injured’ by the acts of the government for them to have standing. Just like how I can’t sue because some cop violated your rights. The ‘injury’ didn’t happen to me, therefore I have no standing to sue. You would so it’s up to you to make it known that you don’t like your rights being violated. Nobody can solicit that from you either. That’s illegal.

[@larsongramckow7495]

No, class action is just a group of people. That's the only difference

[@InsaneCajunsUnleash]

@larsongramckow7495 & a single "injured" couldn't stand up wherreas a class action of injured could have the standing ¿?

[@Richard-te8pb]

What some cowards. That's what they want to hind behind?

[@smorris281]

Get it over it.

[@AustinKoleCarlisle]

@@smorris281 when the pendulum swings the other way, i don't want to hear anyone complaining about government overreach. enjoy the next 50 years of a conservative government.

[@larsongramckow7495]

​@@AustinKoleCarlisleshut up. You are the minority and unwanted

[@donniehoward1612]

Corruption is rampant in government!

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

DoI 2.0 is needed immediately.

[@daveminer9217]

If you think we have free speech now, just try to post a comment here using words or terms that "Big Brother" deems inappropriate. Your comment will "disappear" faster than Barbara Eden nodding her head.

[@brianbeckymeyers7393]

😂😂😂

[@erenyeager8306]

yeah it's called youtube's terms of service

[@daveminer9217]

@@erenyeager8306 NO child, it's called a violation of mine, AND YOUR! Constitutional Rights. You're kindergarten classmates must be so proud of you...🇺🇲

[@bt1169]

@@daveminer9217 "YOUR" you're = you are Your classmates in 2nd grade can explain the difference to you.

[@vermilionlevel]

@@daveminer9217 So you don't understand the First Amendment? Got it. It protects you from prosecution by the government for your speech, not from moderation on a website.

[@justtemporary726]

to have "standing" for the common man means you have to let them harm you incarcerate you and only then can you bring a case the distinction and game they are playing is... implied violence, and conditional violence, to scare you away from your rights because no one wants to be attacked and incarcerated before they can FEEL FREE TO SPEAK ...FREELY!!

[@heathernks8]

Literally not what standing means at all. One need not be incarcerated to have standing in a lawsuit. Your elevator doesn't go all the way to the top floor, huh?

[@justtemporary726]

@@heathernks8 r u lonely or just want to argue? what was that "this these" arguement? you are like kamala harris arguing.....liberty, and the pursuit of happiness purposely leaving out ...LIFE!! YOU WOULD BE SOO SMART TO LISTEN TO ME INSTEAD OF "LITERALLY" NOT!! "standing" "legal standing" ask a smart person WHAT YOU ARE STANDING ON? HOW WERE YOU HARMED? im sorry i dont think you are smart enough to understand i wont help you

[@daysrcdays]

Your mad because you can't say things that get people killed???? You want to distort medical information that saves lives? WHY? What part of your freedom is curtailed by telling the truth?

[@cachelesssociety5187]

@@heathernks8 I hate to see people suffering with the need to insult others. I hope you feel better.

[@reginabasilio8456]

Are they also getting paid by the demons craps???

[@ChiefMiddleFinger]

I’m sure CensorTube is rejoicing over this Orwellian ruling.

[@thephotoandthestory]

So state AGs don't have standing on behalf off their constituents?

[@FosterTravis1071]

Probably not, under section 230, get that out and standing issues will dissappear.

[@tobybigham4196]

This is the centralization of Federal Power that was coveted by the Obama administration. Besides for trampling the rights of constituents, Obama didn't like to rely on the power of the states. And he did the same thing with the FBI by stripping power away from the field offices.

[@mikefisc9989]

It appears so. This is remedied by having their actual constituents come forward to file a lawsuit.

[@bigreg4096]

State constitution don't trump federal constitution two different institutions

[@DevilTravels]

Not in this case involving private businesses operating at the federal level.

[@user-sq6rg9lq8m]

American 'rights' really started to deteriorate on 1/20/93 look up

[@ArminiusConrad]

Bill?

[@CherokeeBird]

Clinton 🤬

[@miophx8283]

How about November 22, 1963, and earlier?

[@darkone292]

Right when rap was getting popular

[@jessesimmons4503]

@@miophx8283🎯

[@banalucki]

We the People expect an apology from the DOJ. So far, since the passage of The Patriot Act, it is the only mental institution that has not admitted to being imperfect and making mistakes.

[@Dont.Call.Me.Tall.]

The DOJ doesn't decide what is legal and illegal. typically juries do that.

[@daysrcdays]

The Patriot Act is not an institution.

[@banalucki]

@@daysrcdays I was clearly referring to the mental institutions set up by Patriot Act...thanks for letting me clarify it...

[@daysrcdays]

@@banalucki Wrond again! The Patriot act is to stop acts of terror, NOTHING ELSE!

[@mikebryant614]

It would have been helpful if the SCOTUS explained the reasoning behind them " not having standing"., as well as explaining who does, or would have "standing" to pursue this Case.Because I dont think ANY Americans from ANY side, the Left or the Right, thinks it is okay for the current Govt whoever it may be ,to demand social media outlets silence people , opinions or ideas.

[@mikefisc9989]

I may be wrong, but I think what the SC is saying here is that they do not want a state AG filing this lawsuit. What they want is the actual people who were censored filing the lawsuit. They want the actual victims in court.

[@TheDpDrifter]

​@@mikefisc9989 that is exactly correct. A plaintiff has to show they've been damaged, and if none of the AGs has been censored by social media via a government request then they haven't been damaged.

[@AustinKoleCarlisle]

@@TheDpDrifter but we have a representative government.

[@kentlbrown5810]

How does something get all the way to the SCOTUS without standing? There had to be at least 3 lower courts that ruled there was standing.

[@Donner906]

Stupid courts. This happens when conservatives appoint judges.

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

"No Standing" is one of the most infuriating, poke you in the eye, responses from government, especially when it comes to any INALIENABLE right enumerated in our Bill of Rights. Fortunately for the USSC justices we don't behave like Chuck Schumer and threaten them.

[@oranaz551]

No Standing? my A*S,if it Effects all citizens all citizens can sue them.

[@bigtom1991]

Good luck Mr lawyer 😂😂😂😂😂

[@larsongramckow7495]

No they can't

[@timzello3948]

Since when do States not have standing? Ridiculous

[@cady__]

Read 230

[@johnyager1205]

@@cady__since the congress granted “230”. Then the congress needs to revoke it. Problem solved. Can’t wait until November. All of this nonsense will e over.MAGA.

[@daysrcdays]

Of course states have no standing. Which state was hurt and how?

[@jamest3552]

​@@daysrcdays Every citizen of every State has standing. People can now be silenced by social media that is being forced by the gov't to control speech.

[@SAMIAm-sm6ki]

This is what happens when the Supreme Court is bought and paid for.😂

[@user-un3is9ej5h]

Or more likely threatened

[@daysrcdays]

BY REPUBLICANS lol.

[@martinepstein3332]

Still have more faith in the US legal system than I do with the Russian, Chinese or North Korean legal apparatus

[@SAMIAm-sm6ki]

@@martinepstein3332 Why do I care about different countries when I live in this country?😆🥳

[@SAMIAm-sm6ki]

@@daysrcdays Doesn't matter by who we're both f*****

[@rashone2879]

Free speech “community” what the H is that?

[@lauriivey7801]

Exactly WHO does have standing?? What a damned copout!!

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

Seems with this government, only Illegal Invaders have standing, even to the point of forcing us to pay for their housing, clothing, food, medical care.

[@Cherish1056]

No one does.... it seems So disappointing.

[@nicholashughes8214]

Ok so they chickened out of making a decision

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

We are too lowly for the elite on the USSC to bother with. EVERY legal American has the Inalienable Right to demand the USSC protect the 1st Amendment, which by the way, has ZERO exclusions for Free Speech.

[@user-un3is9ej5h]

Serious threats against your spouse and children might make you do things you don't want to. Think about how the Democrats and their media are constantly complaining about the Conservative justices.

[@BiblicallyAccurateToaster]

Very dissapointing. Free speech in public spaces are an inherent right.

[@PurdyScaryProductions]

You didn't actually pay attention huh??

[@drzaius1121]

​@@PurdyScaryProductionsdid you kiddo? The white house is involved. It's not just the social media company anymore.

[@mattt5006]

I get censored on cnn and msnbc by KZbin every time I ask about border questions during the debate.

[@PurdyScaryProductions]

Yep, it's a 3rd party platform...they can do that.

[@1stCensorshipGroupInc]

@@PurdyScaryProductions So when you Get Censored, Don't Start Crying.

[@PurdyScaryProductions]

@@1stCensorshipGroupInc I'm not spreading fake information. I'm good. 😆🤣

[@Dwade689]

I get censored every time I mention liberals

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

@@PurdyScaryProductions The can do that only if the public tolerates it. Strange how many alleged Americans would defend anyone who would censor.

[@jeffreybrozoskie1639]

Fjb

[@DeeZNutZ718.]

FDT🫥😕😐🫤

[@quincyfitzgerald1752]

KJB

[@DeeZNutZ718.]

@@jeffreybrozoskie1639 FDT

[@DeeZNutZ718.]

@@quincyfitzgerald1752 FDT

[@jessesimmons4503]

@@DeeZNutZ718.really showing your IQ.

[@keithgibbs8051]

The social media companies and Bidem Administration are on the same page, and that's a problem. So if you want freedom, then change the administration or change the laws or both.

[@chrisgironda1746]

We need to have a mass exodus of social media platforms. People *NEED* to stop using them. I understand the irony of me posting this on KZbin (one of the platforms in question) as well. I don’t see this ever happening, and that’s why I have an extremely pessimistic view of the downfall of human society as a result. We are doomed.

[@MegaSheric]

The Supreme Court should be ruling according to the constitution not the federal government. Shall not be INFRINGED

[@superkeith3063]

Maybe it’s time the people file class action lawsuit against scotus for failing to uphold their oath and protect the constitution.

[@PurdyScaryProductions]

😂😂😂 sure thing snowflake.

[@1stCensorshipGroupInc]

@@PurdyScaryProductions

[@whocares3823]

Free speech community? You mean the entire USA...

[@robertjohnson2899]

ACB is not the conservative everyone thinks

[@jasonmorgan27]

She is a woman, and Trump once again makes a BAD decision

[@AustinKoleCarlisle]

she's definitely one of those people who's afraid to go against the herd.

[@Ponykeg53]

who ever thought they were?

[@Bwanar1]

They can say what they want, but Conservatives won't try to silence you for not agreeing with them. However, Liberals think there way is the only way. This is AMERICA, home of the FREE. We came here to be able to make our own choices and not have others (especially government), force their ideals on US. People will always disagree, doesn't mean one is wrong.

[@TheOriginalJphyper]

You haven't been paying much attention to conservatives.

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

@@TheOriginalJphyper I HAVE and we are NOT calling for censorship because nothing is better than letting those who hate the USA and hate Free Speech, expose themselves for who and what they are. Much better than calling for censorship and letting those bent on our destruction to hide in the shadows.

[@carltaylor5359]

In theory, anyone whose social media account was interfered with in any way as a result of making statements contrary to the Administration's position on COVID, Hunter's Laptop, etc. was "injured". Many of those who experienced a reduction in reach, ban, or demonetization directly had their First Amendment rights impaired by the Administration's actions. All of those actions could also be an unconstitutional "taking" because the governments actions restricted the account owner's rights so much that the governmental action becomes the functional equivalent of a physical seizure. Anyone who was directly injured could therefore have standing to sue the Biden Administration under the First and Fifth Amendments.

[@mritalianhillbilly]

Example: KZbin right here, speak what you really think watch it get deleted, or shadowed

[@cortical1]

KZbin does this on its own not the government. Private businesses do what they want.

[@michellerussell49]

​@@cortical1The White House is in direct contact with social media companies on what to censor & YT is no different

[@mritalianhillbilly]

@@cortical1 yeah because they don’t have no ties with the establishment

[@cortical1]

@@mritalianhillbilly False dichotomy. They do have ties with the establishment, and they also do whatever they want to protect their business interests. My business, my choice. If you don't agree with KZbin policies, stop using the platform and stop whining. 🇺🇸

[@AustinKoleCarlisle]

@@cortical1 prove they do it on their own

[@nikos6220]

So what does it take… Elon suing the government?

[@kate_martinez795]

He works for them, he is no different than the rest.

[@nikos6220]

@@kate_martinez795 agreed, just like with China he won’t jeopardize the existence of his companies

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

@@kate_martinez795 He is VASTLY different from the rest especially those who would slander him for making Twitter/X a more, albeit not perfect, "Free Speech" platform. The MSM, liberals, LOATH free speech as it exposes their destructive and deadly ideology. There are still some San Francisco area type subjects which remain verboten on all social media regardless of how accurate they may be.

[@Cherish1056]

Don't you get it? No one "has standing " in other words the Court refuses to make a decision on it.

[@nikos6220]

@@Cherish1056 nobody has standing is different from the plaintiffs don’t have standing

[@lukeanderson4189]

This is their default step, like outright choosing not to hear a case. When they don't want to tackle a hard topic, they simply punt. It's cowardice laid out in plain sight.

[@FlipDahlenburg]

Nope! They decide according to the Constitution and the Law. If you don't like it, do something about it. Just do it legally.

[@lukeanderson4189]

@@FlipDahlenburg 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Enjoy your drinks.

[@VenomKen]

This ranks up there with the other all time dumbest ruling of corporations are people too.

[@stevenwalker4923]

It would take a user of the social media app to sue. Someone with deep pockets needs to sue these social media apps to remove section 230 protections.

[@sayhisnamelibsDJT24]

It was NOT a good idea to have Frozen Joe on the world stage so often... He was making more appearances lately just to prove his cognizance (or lack off... ) to the world. He gaffed, he meandered, he went catatonic, and he loaded his drawers. It was a huge failure, now he's back in hiding. Hopefully he makes it to the debate Thursday,

[@jon2026]

You are a fake news junkie.

[@TheOriginalJphyper]

None of that is relevant to this video. If you want to complain about the president, do it on a video _about_ the president.

[@sayhisnamelibsDJT24]

@@TheOriginalJphyper Go back inside your tent and maybe clean it out while you're in there. PLEASE dispose of your needles, urine jugs, bags of feces etc properly. You need to keep fellow encampment dwellers safe.

[@_Fake_Rolex]

This ruling came from TRUMP's 6-3 Supreme Court.

[@TheOriginalJphyper]

@@sayhisnamelibsDJT24 What do you think I am, Californian?

[@53zwitt]

Don't like the "rules", drop social media!!

[@Donner906]

A smart comment

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

Wow! Imagine what kind of country we would be today had the Founders been so quick to side with socialists, communists, dictators who can never tolerate Free Speech.

[@normarojo5834]

Coercion from government is not the rules to liked.

[@Donner906]

@@normarojo5834 Yeah "coercion". On the internet the government invented.

[@tdestroyer4780]

We had a few short years there of almost total freedom of expression on social media. A place free to rant from strict conservative censorship. How the tables have turned.

[@Tazaichi0]

The crazy thing is WE THE PEOPLE HAVE POWER it just doesn't show when the govt etc keep us at each others throats by using race and these political races of rep and dem if we stood together as people we coukd make the government do what we want they would work for us like they shouldve been doing for years but as long as they keep the masses of people fighting each other their will never be change

[@sherylrich2461]

💯💯💯

[@SockPuppet28]

Meanwhile while this is going down, 20 somethings are more concerned about gaming on their Nintendo, coloring their hair green, changing gender, or new tattoo and piercing selections.🙄

[@TheOriginalJphyper]

If there's one thing both sides of the country can agree on, it's how crooked the current Supreme Court is. Too bad much of Congress (who is in charge of fixing it) doesn't share that opinion.

[@ALuDoy]

Donald J. Trump 2024! 🇺🇸 Make America 🇺🇸 Great Again! 👍

[@martinepstein3332]

That's up to the American people

[@genuineappeal3458]

SCOTUS always decides in the best interest of the nation, not the people.

[@randylaffy7679]

We need 1776 is this continues

[@PurdyScaryProductions]

You all say that, yet can't explain what it means...

[@Joaopereira-dh3dw]

Mommy 👶👶👶👶😭😭😭

[@michaelcollins5403]

Be careful what you say on here they are watching

[@nightmarestitcher]

Speaking of corrupted one sided platforms.....

[@Nokomisclub]

BS. GET some guts SCOTUS

[@bobwoods1302]

Please get out in November and vote. Russia can't stand another four years of Biden.

[@MakeAmericaGayAgain.]

Good one

[@desireem929]

I think it's time to hold government officials and new media conglomerates accountable financially when they spread disinformation or LIES

[@tanniswalker510]

I am so confused! I don’t understand anything that they are talking about, it’s like they’re dancing around the issue without saying what the actual threat is… Maybe I’m just ignorant and don’t understand because I don’t know what the Supreme Court is ruling on…

[@millennial4840]

Same

[@Cherish1056]

Yes maybe look up what the case I'd about then rewatch this video then it's clear.

[@mnamber]

What?? Why can they not speak English, why is everything spoken like it’s passive aggressive??

[@SockPuppet28]

Thomas Jefferson:"Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny". "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants". "Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories".

[@magaman911]

Maybe more whining will save your country. MAGA!

[@rhondasherman8259]

This is such BS. They can spew their bs and hide truths through their cronies...uggghh

[@missydee1966]

I am really tired of Facebook censoring what I post . They delete my post and don’t even tell me why and I don’t even know which post they are because they don’t even show me which post it is. How am I supposed to not post things that you don’t want me to post if you don’t even show me what post is a wrong post?

[@user-cv6lx5hs4t]

We have the best Supreme Court money can buy. 💰🐷

[@CalvinMorris-cf8jk]

mind boggling

[@davidkostreva1179]

Twitter X just got infinitely more valuable to our free speech.

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

Very true which is why Elon has become public enemy #1 for the MSM, Big Tech, and the political left.

[@kjvail]

Lame cop out, subtext is that governments can do whatever TF they want. Go home and shut up. That’s that , great job justices 👎👎👎

[@libertybutcherblocks]

BAN Section 230. Section 230 provides immunity for platforms when they act as the publisher of the material posted by their users, including when the platforms edit or fail to edit this material. Why? Because it allows our Gov't to propagandize us under the Smith-Mundt Act. Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 (obama administration) - Amends the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 to authorize the Secretary of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to provide for the preparation and dissemination of information intended for foreign audiences abroad about the United States, including about its people, its history, and the federal government's policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers and instructors. (Under current law such authority is restricted to information disseminated abroad, with a limited domestic exception.) In a nutshell, our Gov't is controlling our free speech by proxy.

[@chrisgironda1746]

It’ll never happen. We gave them the power, and they’ll never relinquish it. We’re doomed.

[@theMemo-1]

Roberts needs to be replaced

[@sabaha4637]

Yeah right 🙄

[@Msroach89]

​@@_Fake_Rolex because schooling is for liberals

[@theMemo-1]

@@_Fake_Rolex auto correct probably

[@theMemo-1]

@@_Fake_Rolex thanks johnnie

[@theMemo-1]

@@Royale_with_Cheeze new attitude john?

[@1965Grit]

So basically, the Supreme Court just punted for now, this will come back around.

[@mikefisc9989]

This ruling was issued on standing. What this does is invite plaintiffs who do have standing to come forward and file a lawsuit.

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

So which Americans do not have standing in your opinion, when it comes to INALIENABLE Rights of every American enumerated in our Bill of Rights? Strange at a time when the government is IGNORING the MANDATE and DEMAND placed on government to "Protect our Borders" and even forcing us real Americans, without standing obviously, to pay for housing, food, clothing, medical care of illegal invaders.

[@josephcollins6033]

Love, love Turley!!!

[@dean9327]

America is over

[@magaman911]

Maybe more whining will save your country. MAGA!

[@collette9008]

Goes to show we can't trust anyone, not even SCOTUS 😡

[@magaman911]

Maybe more whining will save your country. MAGA!

[@thomaspenny4183]

The supreme Court was talking about abortion. And they used the term pregnant people ! Ridiculous !

[@rustonhafif462]

Trump the convicted felon can fix it 🎉

[@ElonaldTrusk]

Yes he can!!

[@GrandpaVince]

When old vincey hears about our beloved American patriot commandments I get misty eyed with pride 🇱🇷

[@FranktheTanker]

Yeah right, right. That’s like ruling separate but equal.

[@nickf2170]

So the government is considered a third party here, and not actionable? I believe that would be considered a conspiracy or even racketeering if anyone else did that. Is that not correct?

[@joefrommontana252]

Trump 2024! Because there’s still 3 Supreme Court justices that we don’t own!

[@TallTigerTwo]

Looking at your previous comments, your liberal feathers are showing.

[@siberianbear450]

​@@TallTigerTwoJoe is from Montana, he sounds pretty conservative to me

[@annebreitrick6116]

@@siberianbear450 😉

[@joefrommontana252]

@@TallTigerTwo There’s 9 Supreme Court justices, 6 GOP and 3 lib. I’m saying we should buy an RV or house or whatever for the liberal ones too like we did for Clarence so they’ll be on our side. If you don’t agree with that, you might be a RINO instead of MAGA. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@TallTigerTwo]

@@siberianbear450 After his last comment, do you still believe that? You people need to be better at picking out posers. I could spot this dude a mile away.

[@BikerBenny]

HAWK TUGH ‼️

[@jrwilliams4029]

Kavenaugh and Amy Coney Barrett continue to disappoint. They are both moderates who emulate Rino Chief Justice Roberts.

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

Nobody can tell me anyone on the USSC is worthy of that seat on the bench. These are supposed to be the best and brightest and most honest yet the nation rightfully so, gets tied up in knots worrying about who occupies the WH or holds the majority in the Senate when an appointment is made. If these were good people why should this matter? Any decision other than 9-0 or 8-1 or at worse 7-2 indicates nothing but treasonous judicial bias and a court unconstitutionally attempting to legislate from the bench. People, our founding documents are hundreds of years old and very short in comparison to today's legal BS and they even came with an "Owners Manual" known as the Federalist Papers. It takes the total dishonestly of a lawyer to not figure out what the Founders intended. If something must be changed in the Constitution or Bill of Rights the ONLY LEGAL means is a Constitutional Amendment not a USSC ruling or case law.

[@michaelfrock2473]

They have always been pro corporations. Look at the ruling when they said companies are people.

[@AeroMetalRush]

Love and support for the Supreme Court of the United States from Russia 🇺🇲 🇷🇺 This Court has always been fair and just!! Trump 2024!!!!

[@JamesMilne-hi2ot]

Fair and just by the standards Russians are used to at any rate.

[@spider-man910]

Your against the law .....why .

[@thermodynamics458]

“Joan Rivers voted for me in 2016!” - Convict Donald John Trump. [Joan Rivers died in 2014.]

[@FlipDahlenburg]

Oh, WELL, we better vote for O'Biden, then hadn't we?

[@erenyeager8306]

@@FlipDahlenburg "o'biden" wasn't running in 2016

[@88wildcat]

Like dead people have never voted in this country. I'd give even odds Rivers is still on the voting roll in California.

[@michaelgranger7113]

Dems wrote the manual on getting out the dead vote.

[@Chris-rg6nm]

Weird that Fox News isn't covering the Bribery ruling.

[@jamjams690]

what i take from this is the only ones that have a standing to sue is the social media companies themselves

[@CMane]

tRump/McConnell packed court. 💯

[@nickdippold2258]

And that hurts your feelings? You poor, left-wing cry baby. Maybe demented Joey can sniff your hair and make it all better. Sheeesh.... LMFAO!

[@corallopez1563]

With a conservative and pro Trump Supreme Court, anything they decide is MAGA

[@JamesWoodson071]

MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN 👏🏼👏🏼😁

[@cameronsinnett8117]

Lopez is an idiot

[@dantofl8811]

Of course MAGA, or you want a fallen America? You probably not American if you oppose MAGA

[@scottgollahon3681]

If he appointed 3 out of 9 judges then 66% of the court ISNT MAGA got to LOVE that leftist math though huh must be what they're teaching in schools these days LOL

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

Thanks for exposing your dislike of Americans who want to "Make America Great Again" as it speaks volumes about who and what you are.

[@hotchihuahua1546]

Only when you have a divided Supreme Court do I question their judgement as to why they voted this way ! It should be unanimous in most cases !

[@eriknewman5288]

Oh so we're letting govt decide who is not telling the truth??? Yeah that's safe.

[@matthewsteinway1869]

All liars and thieves.

[@alfredmcbride000]

The standing is they have the right to hear the comments deleted..as much as the speakers had to say..Supreme Court errored

[@Cherish1056]

It seems to be a pattern "no standing" whenever its difficult to make a decision...........

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

We the People are too lowly for the USSC to waste their time with. We the Government, We the Corporations, We the Unions, We the Organizations are far more important.

[@The-knowing-unknownary]

Online outlets have gotten out of control. Employers and friends use anything “expressed”, to judge you. Punishments of loss of employment is ridiculous

[@RazorStrap]

Everybody has standing. It impacts and affects everybody. Including states.

[@rubenestrada7095]

The supreme Court of nothing 🤐

[@ChuckToddMeetThePress]

The US gov't finds: The civilian population of America (non gov't) do not have standing!

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

But illegal invaders do! So much so that we are being forced to pay for their housing, food, clothing, medical care.

[@josephshields939]

The Congress must act to declare that social media companies are the same as other public utilities. This would require them to serve all of the public equally.

[@danielmartin7838]

We as a society have empowered social media and big tech to an unprecedented level. Totalitarianism was inevitable, they are in every aspect of our lives on their terms. Cast off the shackles of enslavement, dump social media, smart phones, cars and appliances

[@kraftwurx_Aviation]

I wonder if this means the ATF doesn't have standing to bring suits. Why would they.

[@ytmndan]

Horrible coverage. Who were the plaintiffs? What was their complaint? WHY didn't they have standing? The most basic, essential questions of this story have not been addressed in any way by the reporters.

[@MercenaryMuse]

Free speech does not cover: endangerment to others, personal threats, insightment to rebellion or riot, slander or libel (private redress allowed), and certain anti-government speech especially during war time.

[@_Fake_Rolex]

Nor incitement.

[@mikewurlitzer5217]

Show me the part in the first amendment which supports your theory? The Founders intended you to be free to speak especially about politics but people love to post straw man arguments about things that have nothing to do with the case. We MUST be free to say anything and Responsible if we LIED.

[@John-yh8oe]

Roberts need to go