The Supreme Court on Thursday overturned New York state's guidelines on concealed guns in public. CBS2's Tony Aiello has more on how the court came to this ruling.
Пікірлер: 1 900
@nilst3472 жыл бұрын
The “specified danger” you face in New York is living in New York.
@keithjackson20352 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@nilst3472 жыл бұрын
@Emblem of Vigilance 13% 50%
@rattusgrenadus82912 жыл бұрын
Bruh NYC's murder rate per 100,000 is not even top 50 in the country. literally, that's per FBI data. the poors and primitives who live in the sticks have been saying otherwise for a while but the data is there
@rattusgrenadus82912 жыл бұрын
@Emblem of Vigilance bruh ima be real im white but im heavily heavily armed and if i ever find a racist like u irl i swear to god. click. boom. splat. thud.
@nilst3472 жыл бұрын
@Emblem of Vigilance I didn't know it increased. Thanks
@bsmith89432 жыл бұрын
Outstanding. If you have no criminal record you should be able to protect yourself at all times.
@bigboybigboy332 жыл бұрын
Just like the kids who murdered people in Buffalo and little kids and teachers in Uvalde. Both shooters were “protecting” themselves.
@victorjcano2 жыл бұрын
Both of shooters in Texas in Buffalo didn’t have criminal records until they did but by then it was a little late wasn’t it
@ki58952 жыл бұрын
@@victorjcano That doesn't mean we need to punish normal citizens.
@matthewviramontes31312 жыл бұрын
So a 13 year old should be allowed to conceal carry?
@gabrielreyes84762 жыл бұрын
Even if you have a criminal record, you should be able to protect yourself at all times. There is no 2 tier system in protection; apart from the obvious murders, dope dealers, abusers and repeat offenders. Some of the most salt of the earth men I know made 1 simple mistake in their youth and they are now in their late 40's, early 50's. I make sure they carry because they have every right to, so don't give me that "record" crap. Nowhere in the 2nd does it say "except those who have a record".
@drbichat2 жыл бұрын
If Biden disagrees that means is a good ruling
@MultiSkippy1012 жыл бұрын
Lol
@slabbusterrtr76902 жыл бұрын
Yep
@donnvall92562 жыл бұрын
Yep! Biden is a no common sense motor-mouth, like 95% of all politicians, Dem or Rep.
@MirageP9112 жыл бұрын
most definitely
@surgep2 жыл бұрын
You don't need a special reason to carry a gun. Self defense is reason enough, especially in NY
@Nuttyirishman852 жыл бұрын
You should have the right to do so, no matter what.
@Claymore83652 жыл бұрын
Seriously, you'd figure that the people who constantly talk about how you can't trust the police would want people to be able to protect themselves.
@redpillscience12882 жыл бұрын
You don't need any reason
@workingshlub88612 жыл бұрын
@@Claymore8365 well said.....after the cops screwed up in texas so bad we need more responsible gun owners..
@TheGM-20XX2 жыл бұрын
@@Claymore8365 that would involve some cognitive abilities and honestly that is asking to much of them.
@scoobydoo89862 жыл бұрын
Does anyone find it ironic when politicians (who have tax-payer funded “armed” bodyguards) tell citizens they do not need guns to feel safe?
@elizabitty2132 жыл бұрын
I do I do! 🤦🏻♀️ they’re blatant hypocrites but most won’t think about that unless the news tells them to be upset about it
@grandcanyon22 жыл бұрын
they do so because its in their best interest if less people have guns overall, those politicans are more safe as they protection. Since when have you heard of any politican being shoot at or on attacked, people know better.
@jimstools39372 жыл бұрын
The Democrats Who Hire Body Guards Shouldn’t Carry Any Fire Arms At All . They Should Be Given Cap Guns.
@jedmcdonald46952 жыл бұрын
It does my heart good every time someone points this out. I noticed it gets real quiet too.
@Spasoutkingcod2 жыл бұрын
Extacly
@donnvall92562 жыл бұрын
Who remembers the 70s bumper sticker: "When Guns Are Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Guns."
@KingDevoneoGotBeats2 жыл бұрын
That’s a true statement tho 💯
@NoalFarstrider2 жыл бұрын
If the choice is to be a criminal or to be an outlaw. I'd rather be an outlaw with morals than a dead citizen.
@donnvall92562 жыл бұрын
@@NoalFarstrider: Exactly!
@ferrisbueller9991 Жыл бұрын
@@NoalFarstrider You wouldn’t become an outlaw, rather they would make you one.
@NoalFarstrider Жыл бұрын
@@ferrisbueller9991 The title remains the same.
@coke80772 жыл бұрын
Props to the Supreme Court on preserving the authority of the Constitution. This is a big step in the right direction in terms of gun laws.
@cdevidal2 жыл бұрын
"We'll take your guns!" 3D printer go brrrr
@davidransom44762 жыл бұрын
What are the politicians worried about? The criminals are already armed.
@workingshlub88612 жыл бұрын
great point...the bad guys always find a way to to get guns no matter how many laws are made.....why do far leftist freak out when its easier for law abiding people to have firearms???
@tomsuh13622 жыл бұрын
They are worry if lawfull citizen kill the criminals that they will have to shut down or reduce court/jails because there are no criminals to lock upand no business for these judges,attorneys. This whole judicail systems is all about business too.
@Aphotic_One2 жыл бұрын
Yeah but now the president has to worry that someone might pop his crackhead criminal kid
@napnemeanix2 жыл бұрын
Criminals and crooked politicians need to be put down in their own casket and death penalty.
@oscarperez14862 жыл бұрын
punishs criminals not law abiding citizens
@pedromartell16502 жыл бұрын
U mean punish ?
@sipioc2 жыл бұрын
@@pedromartell1650 you mean “you”?
@cwg92382 жыл бұрын
punishing everyone for the irresponsibility of some is just commie logic.
@lettheflamestakeover17932 жыл бұрын
@@sipioc are you 🌈? what's the matter you can't spell either🫵😂🤣 *you and 7 others apparently let's see how high it goes😃
@punkeasy2 жыл бұрын
@Oscar Perez "punishs criminals not law abiding citizens" Unlike law enforcement 👮
@blackhouse76462 жыл бұрын
Finally. Now, we need constitutional carry in ever state and territory.
@idrisali39472 жыл бұрын
wackos like you are the reason america has so many issues from within. it’s 2022. we’ve evolved from the need to carry guns. the sooner we get rid of the inbred ideals like needing to carry a gun will be the day that people in america will wake up and actually be happy. you say you need a gun for protection, well buddy, the real problem is with the average mental health of US people. instead of fighting a losing crime war, invest in infrastructure and public institutions so people are generally more happier and taken care. -from an american who’s lived in a few european countries. i hope you wake up
@dorkbreath75632 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@r.d.9399 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely agree. Our Constitutional Rights should not be different in different states.
@FatherManus Жыл бұрын
With this ruling we effectively do have it. Any state with restrictions similar to New York’s special needs provision will be overturned if challenged in court.
@vlorenzo21062 жыл бұрын
Now this is a true "common sense" gun law!
@cashdapoet5736 Жыл бұрын
I'm from NYC and I joined the military.... I instantly realized what it meant to own a firearm... its safer for me to defend myself and my family then to wait for the nypd to save me... the police are an after action organization meaning that they usually show up AFTER the crime has already happened...and the victim already victimized... so I'd rather be able to shoot and stop the perpetrators in real time, rather than fight for my life in a hospital bed on life support waiting for nypd to search for the criminals who may never be found... its that simple
@Useless222 жыл бұрын
Once again: if a criminal is ok with robbing/killing you, what makes you think they’ll draw the line at a meaningless gun ban? The reality is they won’t care and don’t care; all these laws do is make the general public weak, controllable, and vulnerable to criminals.
@MBsr52 жыл бұрын
criminals have guns regardless
@Useless222 жыл бұрын
@@MBsr5 That’s exactly what I just said.
@MBsr52 жыл бұрын
@@Useless22 yeah but you wrote a long winded chapter with redundancies
@Useless222 жыл бұрын
@@MBsr5 No I’m just more intelligent than you. I know I’m more intelligent than you because you don’t know what “redundant” means.
@MBsr52 жыл бұрын
@@Useless22 you repeated the same thing in different ways. Get to the point. Your username is appropriate.
@DarkSpaceMarine2 жыл бұрын
Conservative justices are extremely right on this one. The rich and famous shouldn’t be the only ones allowed to protect themselves! Joe Biden couldn’t explain why he thinks this ruling contradicts the constitution even if he wanted to.
@haydenmoore5842 жыл бұрын
I’d be surprised if he can brush his own dentures anymore
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
"Joe Biden couldn’t explain why he thinks this ruling contradicts the constitution even if he wanted to" - Really? You asked him? What did he say? For the record, the second Amendment doesn't say a single word about self-defense. It speaks only about "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State. In other words, it was about arming the then-current military, not civilians.
@haydenmoore5842 жыл бұрын
@@nomore6167 the civilians were the military, that’s what a militia is.
@josephfuller62292 жыл бұрын
@@nomore6167 I agree
@kd7412 жыл бұрын
You know, the thing…
@nilst3472 жыл бұрын
Breaking: Supreme Court strikes down unlawful New York law.
@Danr072 жыл бұрын
Not just unlawful, unconstitutional. Imagine the founding fathers being in agreement with citizens asking permission from a government bureaucrat(s), with unknown specificity as to exactly what the government considers justified, to protect yourself and your family outside of your home.
@rattusgrenadus82912 жыл бұрын
@@Danr07 ...are you sober?
@danielramirez-me6pn2 жыл бұрын
@@rattusgrenadus8291 are you a sheep?
@chris22172 жыл бұрын
@@Danr07 technically the 2nd amendment never specifies if citizens can privately own guns they only mention the people of the militias for the security of the state
@nilst3472 жыл бұрын
@@chris2217 technically the constitution states that every able bodied citizen is a part of the militia.
@Beavereaver2 жыл бұрын
What this means is that democrats won’t be able to infringe on New Yorker’s right to protect themselves.
@leftoverpizzaonthewindowsi20292 жыл бұрын
I never thought I'd see the day
@CaneFu2 жыл бұрын
I have no idea what you're talking about as I am a lifetime Democrat, gun owner, and have a concealed carry license. Stop listening to political talking heads from the right who try to convince you that Democrats are anti-gun rights as we are NOT. We're all on the same side, we're not the enemy, we're all Americans. And I agree with the SCOTUS ruling today.
@Beavereaver2 жыл бұрын
@@CaneFu democrats are not the enemy and neither are the republicans. Unfortunately though all the democrats in power right now are NOT moderates but rather far left borderline communists.
@nickmasuen18592 жыл бұрын
Oh ya man, you are just sooo right, and New York, along with a lot of other states, will be able to get rid of all those nut jobs who can't handle shit, they will be able to go out and get a gun and then blow their head off and New York, along with every other state, won't have to deal with them any more. after all your right to protect yourself by getting a gun as quickly as you can overrides a mentally weak persons ability to live. Am I right James or am I right? After all we as a country don't need any gun laws that affects anyone what so ever from getting a gun, no matter who they are, don't you agree?
@CaneFu2 жыл бұрын
@@Beavereaver LOL, there is nothing "far left" about Joe Biden. You have no idea what communism even is so you should probably just stop embarrassing yourself.
@MM-dv1gm2 жыл бұрын
But don't worry you will still be arrested for exercising self defense and subject to thousands in lawyers and court fees.
@macriggland65262 жыл бұрын
exactly.
@macriggland65262 жыл бұрын
extremely based take.
@rileywelton32432 жыл бұрын
@@macriggland6526 not really....carrying a firearm for self defense you should know that even if you are justified in a self defense shooting, you will more than likely be sued in civil court. It is what it is....
@macriggland65262 жыл бұрын
@@rileywelton3243 BeTTeR tO BE JuDgED By TwElVE thaN CarRiED BY siX, AmiRiTE GuYss?
@shinymew28872 жыл бұрын
@@macriggland6526 actually, yeah lol.
@robertortiz85402 жыл бұрын
Kudos to Judge Clarence Thomas for having the cojones in making the right decision.
@smithderf2 жыл бұрын
Shall issue replaces may issue. It's about time.
@macmiller16782 жыл бұрын
💯 this is long overdue.
@Tallacus2 жыл бұрын
Seeing how social justice DAs and Mayors are so lenient on crime this has to happen for the common folks protection
@catdooley46162 жыл бұрын
Seeing as how the conservatives want to push the constitutional issue on guns, someone might get the idea that we should also push to make sure those same criminals also have a right to bear arms since there is no stipulation in the constitution that can stop them.
@vespacheck2 жыл бұрын
@@catdooley4616 sounds like you just want law abiding citizens killed by guns instead of criminals.
@deebee45752 жыл бұрын
@Derek Dirk This ruling was not about New York City New York State. The lawsuit was against New York State. The fact that it will affect New York City is just incidental
@deebee45752 жыл бұрын
@Derek Dirk New York State has been a blue state since forever. It would still be highly restrictive even if it weren’t for New York City. Thankfully, those days are over.
@Ryan888812 жыл бұрын
I'm extremely far left, but I can't even comprehend why someone would be in favor of restrictive *legal* concealed carry laws. Are there people who genuinely don't understand crime conducted with legal registered guns is incredibly rare? Or do people not even know the difference between legal and illegal guns?
@robertwilliams50152 жыл бұрын
Really? That's odd because normally people that tend to lean left clearly understand why We support strict laws regarding concealed carry because we know that, carrying concealed is more detrimental than beneficial. We understand that more guns on the streets equal......more guns on the street. It's not a knock against responsible gun owners it's an acknowledgement of what's factual. It's not a suggestion that legal gun owners will commit crime, it's the assertion that criminals will have even MORE access to gun because of people carrying. The notion that citizens that carry concealed won't have the guns taken from them or won't be victims of violent crime is laughable. Bad guys are still gonna be bad guys they're just going to be even more violent. They aren't gonna stop victimized people because they're armed. They'll simply increase their level of violence because of it.
@Ryan888812 жыл бұрын
@D Mm Na your economic policies are terrible and most of you, the way you view environmental concerns is a joke. I'm not even a moderate leftist.
@Ryan888812 жыл бұрын
@@robertwilliams5015 "We support strict laws regarding concealed carry because we know that, carrying concealed is more detrimental than beneficial." That's complete nonsense. Punishing people for wanting to protect themselves by making them carry an illegal handgun or legal one just without a permit is detrimental. When the general public of a certain area or region recognizes that the gun laws are strict, criminals become emboldened. New York is the perfect example of this. People get robbed because criminals know that normal law-abiding citizens don't have guns. "We understand that more guns on the streets equal......more guns on the street." More guns on the street isn't a bad thing unless they're heavy duty weaponry or they're illegal/unregistered. No one conducts crime with a legal handgun lol. They'd catch you in 2 seconds. Criminals use ghost guns and many people in the hood, in gun strict places have to carry a ghost gun just to protect themselves and aren't even criminals. It would cause plenty of people to switch over to legal gun carry for protection not vice versa. "The notion that citizens that carry concealed won't have the guns taken from them or won't be victims of violent crime is laughable." Stolen property is always going to be a thing. What's your point? Also you're only highlighting what I'm saying. Of course people will still be victims of violent crime. That's what they need guns. And it's not even forcing them to carry.. It's just allowing people permission so that they wont end up in a prison system that's worse than death or ruin their life with a felony. I'm pro-choice when it comes to concealed carry for guns. Your last 2 sentences were so ridiculously erroneous that I wont even waste my time addressing them. I'll be honest, those last two sentences of yours is starting to make me think you're just trolling. More violent? lol try it on someone else bub.
@robertwilliams50152 жыл бұрын
@@Ryan88881 Punishing people? Where are you getting that from? No one's being punished, lol. That's insane. No one is suggesting that anyone should carry an illegal gun. Criminals don't care about gun laws either way. They don't become emboldened when the citizens are unarmed. That notion is anecdotal. I'd be inclined to believe that if there was a direct correlation with violent crimes and concealed carry. New York is a HORRIBLE example of what you're suggesting and actually supports my point more than yours. Suggesting that NY has more crime because people don't carry concealed without considering ALL of the other factors that contribute to violent crime is irresponsible and highly inaccurate. (That comment alone tells me everything i need to know regarding your position, you havent done your homework have you? ) People that carry concealed get killed in New York on a regular bases. Do you know any members of the NYPD or FDNY? Ask them how many shootings have they responded to where the victim was also armed with a gun. We just responded to one last night. (Or are you suggesting that only LEGAL concealed carry discourages bad guys?) More guns on the street is absolutely a bad thing if the point is to refuse crime. The problem with your position is that you're thinking from the perspective of a good guy. Do you remember the 90's? Car theft was at an all time high nationwide and an an effort to prevent and discourage car theft, manufacturers began making anti theft devices standards on most cars. It seemed like a great idea but in reality it simply have birth to a rise in violent car jackings. The same exact thing will happen with more armed citizens. Bad guys will simply raise their level of violence just in case their potential victim is armed. *"Whats my point?"* MY point doesn't speak to "stolen property" it speaks to the violent overtaking of someone that is perceived to be armed. I never suggested that anyone commits crime with legal guns and the mainstream use of ghost guns is a relatively new thing The only reason you're dismissing my last comments because clearly you're not savvy or informed enough to understand what it means. I'm not suggesting anything lol, I'm definitively, declaring it. The whole troll thing is dead, my friend. I know almost immediately that when a person claims "your a troll" it's because they have an opposing position that they can't defend with factual information that can be substantiated.
@Ryan888812 жыл бұрын
@@robertwilliams5015 "Punishing people? Where are you getting that from? No one's being punished, lol. That's insane. No one is suggesting that anyone should carry an illegal gun." People are punished for carrying ghost guns or guns without a permit. The former (but possibly both) is a felony. You're giving countless people felonies for wanting to protect themselves. "Criminals don't care about gun laws either way." Do you not know what that means? It means they wont follow them. It doesn't mean they're not aware that more people will be carrying lol this is getting out of hand. You're starting to remind me of a republican with all these bizarre mental gymnastics. It's like a type of psychosis. "They don't become emboldened when the citizens are armed. That notion is anecdotal." Ok now your trolling is obvious. Bye bye troll
@jackrock13132 жыл бұрын
Gun control means hitting your target 🎯
@MeToo-py1tq2 жыл бұрын
Gun Control means using both hands too
@beachliving31272 жыл бұрын
We citizens can now strap up as long as we don't have a criminal record. It's a beautiful thing!
@killerbuzzit3472 жыл бұрын
- The words of every mass murderer in the U.S. before slaughtering kids, probably
@juliewalsh48272 жыл бұрын
BEAUATIFUL THING TO CARRY A WAR WEAPON STRAPPED TO YOU? SIR, YOU DO NOT KNOW THE MEANING OF BEAUTY. IT IS A STRANGE WORD FOR YOU SINCE YOU DO NOT HAVE THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
@steveg22772 жыл бұрын
@@juliewalsh4827 Got an issue with lowercase letters I see. Even in your name....LOL calm down Julie.
@beachliving31272 жыл бұрын
@@killerbuzzit347 I'm a little confused. How is future ability to carry contributing to these things that have happened in the past? Don't be a snowflake and strap up buddy!
@beachliving31272 жыл бұрын
@@juliewalsh4827 It's a beautiful thing to be able to exercise your 2nd Amendment right. I will feel a whole lot better traveling across California late at night with my Beretta strapped to my chest. Next time I have car trouble and have to wait for help, I will feel a lot more safe knowing that I have a few friends with me to say hello. The friends are the bullets in my clip because I will be cocked, locked, and ready to rock!
@smokeandmirrors61672 жыл бұрын
The Supreme Court has been on a roll baby!
@brooklynsveryown17692 жыл бұрын
yes they sure have
@donnvall92562 жыл бұрын
Except for today's Roe vs. Wade. I'm for anything that limits the population. But that's humans for you. Right one day, wrong the next. Hypocrite one day, not, the next.
@smokeandmirrors61672 жыл бұрын
@@donnvall9256 Well striking down R v W and leaving it up to the States has really only increased the amount of baby killing.
@Ryan888812 жыл бұрын
Don't get carried away. This is going to be the only good thing they'll ever do. Republicans are wrong on everything else unfortunately.
@helontitus7645 Жыл бұрын
Baby murdering isn’t a right granted to you in the constitution and it isn’t your body.
@Tony-ex2rm2 жыл бұрын
NyS lost when the NYS solicitor stated that a women who works late at night in nyc and takes a subway to her apartment in a crime area does not qualify as a "special need". While at the same time nyc de facto only gives permits to the rich, celebrities, and Politicans
@Deibodese2 жыл бұрын
“Do you have a special reason to need life-saving devices before your life is actually in danger?” What fucking logic. 🤦♂️ Thank god it got struck down.
@JayBee-JB692 жыл бұрын
This is awesome. It's a major win for the people and the US Constitution.
@davidsiracuse66722 жыл бұрын
👍🇺🇸
@jerrys48412 жыл бұрын
It's a major loss for people, children and road rage victims. You get pissed off at someone and you pull out your penis - I mean - gun and start shooting, who's going to be in the way of that bullet? Not you.
@josephcampise99502 жыл бұрын
@Squad wipes™ don't put quotations around things and then get the words wrong. Makes you look pretty stupid
@kittikins12 жыл бұрын
@Squad wipes™ Tha's because they don't know, they just want more guns, everywhere.
@josephcampise99502 жыл бұрын
@Squad wipes™ "being necessary to the security of a free state" as in you are in the state of freedom. Not the freedom of the states.
@Bubblyhiccups2 жыл бұрын
🙌 the right to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!
@slabbusterrtr76902 жыл бұрын
I think them ol boys was serious when they wrote it down ...
@bg55617422 жыл бұрын
Yes sir keep your guns
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
"A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - It's funny how the meaning changes when you quote the whole thing.
@redwingswinthecup14622 жыл бұрын
@@nomore6167 it's funny how you think you made a point.
@cwg92382 жыл бұрын
@@nomore6167 all citizens are militia, and regulated only means supplied, not restricted. re-read the end of the statement, hundreds, thousands of times if you have to until you finally get it. and if you still dont, then you are just mentally ill beyond help.
@Marlen-CruzCommercial_20232 жыл бұрын
So good to see that the Supreme Court is upholding the ORIGINAL constitution 👍
@billg43692 жыл бұрын
Finally New Yorkers can protect themselves! NYC crime may go down? The Dangerous People have been carrying guns forever, odds for Good people just went UP. Bernie Getz!
@BTrain-is8ch2 жыл бұрын
Self-defense is a natural right. The government should not have a subjective say in whether law abiding citizens get to protect themselves to the best of their ability.
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
"The government should not have a subjective say in whether law abiding citizens get to protect themselves to the best of their ability" - Protecting myself to the best of my ability is to immediately kill anyone who causes me fear. Are you saying that I should have the legal right to kill anyone, regardless of where I am, if I feel fear (including scenarios in which if I can easily remove myself from said situation)? Self-defense is always going to be a tricky subject and we can never allow it to become a black-and-white issue (the way it is with police -- how they can say "I feared for my life" as justification every time they shoot someone, including unarmed individuals).
@leftoverpizzaonthewindowsi20292 жыл бұрын
@@nomore6167 lol like u said just leave if u can
@Mannwhich2 жыл бұрын
@@nomore6167 It's simple nimrod! If your life is threatened and in imminent danger, it is your right to defend yourself, your family and your home. Personal protection is your responsibility! Take a personal defense class and learn the laws if this is too complicated for you.
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
@@Mannwhich "Take a personal defense class and learn the laws if this is too complicated for you." - It's not too complicated for me, but it obviously IS too complicated for the many individuals who feel they have or should have the right to carry a gun and kill anybody anywhere. A lot of people can't (or won't) tell the difference between a legitimate threat and "he's looking at me and I feel threatened". Similarly, if someone can easily leave a threatening situation to avoid killing someone, then that should absolutely be required.
@Mannwhich2 жыл бұрын
@@nomore6167 So what? You're always going to be surrounded by stupid dangerous people. Just more reason to have sufficient means to protect yourself. People like you never see the need until you're faced with a life threatening issue that forces you to change your world view.
@ralphholiman74012 жыл бұрын
So now, all New Yorkers can get gun permits just like they were celebrities or politicians?
@davidransom44762 жыл бұрын
Now that Jewish jeweler that's been robbed 3 times and his family has been threatened just for their religion can't be turned down once the adults meet the requirements for a CCW.
@rustyshackleford58302 жыл бұрын
@IG Farben Constitutional carry 🇺🇸🇺🇸💪💪
@trollpolice2 жыл бұрын
Yup all the ppl threatened by the Latin Kings, Woos, Choos, Crips can defend themselves.
@anniehopkins84702 жыл бұрын
@@davidransom4476 ... Might have something to do with the jewels... or the historical debt leveraging and peddling of degeneracy everywhere they go,,, either way :-)
@tomsuh13622 жыл бұрын
Legally yes on paper! But you know NYC corrupt politicain like the most women city council are in an emergency meeting because they dont want a license gun carryer to show their "hoodie homeboys" what real gun control is about. You know these teenager gang with guns can't shoot or handle gun properly.
@hue45122 жыл бұрын
Restoration of 2A rights, that were violated for so long.
@MegaSendit2 жыл бұрын
Thank god we had brilliant founding fathers !!
@rickjames68172 жыл бұрын
Congratulations 🎉 good people of New York 🗽! Let freedom reign !
@IceSick882 жыл бұрын
Thank God! I am very plesently surprised with this decision!
@davidcaunter53462 жыл бұрын
What ACTUALLY happened was the Supreme Court upheld the 2nd amendment rights of the people. “Shall not be infringed” get it?
@darkchild4neverever2 жыл бұрын
Unless it's the fourth amendment and stop and frisk. That we're ok with infringement because of who deals with it.
@NatTurner3282 жыл бұрын
“Well-regulated militia” get it?
@CommentsAllowed2 жыл бұрын
Still not far enough. Requiring a permit or permission, sounds like infringement.
@wojtek96752 жыл бұрын
@@NatTurner328 first of all its talking about the militia not the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Second of all Mikita meant “kept in working order” at the time. It does not mean what it means today
@NatTurner3282 жыл бұрын
@@wojtek9675 Depends on whether or not you interpret through the lens of collective rights or individual rights. It should be noted that from 1939-2008, the collective rights theory took precedent. It wasn’t until 2008 that the 2nd amendment was interpreted the way you see it, which falls under the individual rights theory.
@iSoleyy2 жыл бұрын
Finally! This is what us law abiding citizens have been waiting for!
@abovemadness2 жыл бұрын
As a veteran who was born and raised in NYC, I have spent so much time outside of my home State and loved to experience true freedom in places like Texas and Alaska. This is incredible!!!! I am beyond happy about this especially since I am now back in NYC.
@bsharrard86522 жыл бұрын
Congratulations! New Yorkers deserve the same rights as everyone else in the Country!
@randyscrafts85752 жыл бұрын
Special reason? By who's determination? How can a government or anyone foresee where or when a person may need to use a gun. NY is one of the few states in America that IS NOT an open carry state. I think NY gun laws are too strict. I think this supreme court decision is a good one.
@cwg92382 жыл бұрын
@Cmore Butts imagine being so deranged you think the only people advocating for your rights are a "threat" to you, but not the democrats trying to censor and disarm you.
@greg62352 жыл бұрын
So we now know three Supreme Court Judges have never read the Constitution. Who knew?
@Luisito-id1bx2 жыл бұрын
Second Amendment, buddy. Very simple.
@RIfMlLVrdhpPYbHCcTqjnEFGgNyKku2 жыл бұрын
Likely John G Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson
@coop316842 жыл бұрын
Show me where "special need" is anywhere in the Constitution. Know what is in the Constitution? "Shall NOT be infringed."
@Claymore83652 жыл бұрын
@@Luisito-id1bx The Justices don't know that, though
@redpillscience12882 жыл бұрын
@@RIfMlLVrdhpPYbHCcTqjnEFGgNyKku nope kagen sotomayor and the male liberal
@rmaldonado40312 жыл бұрын
Most pressing reason to CC in NY is living in NY
@randyscrafts85752 жыл бұрын
In the near future I think the law won't apply to anyone anyway. People will be carrying a concealed weapon regardless. That day is for each of us to determine our feeling of safety. Is it too dangerous to get a gallon of milk? Is it too dangerous to visit the doctors office? Is it too dangerous to go to work? These questions and various others will help you determine if you should carry a firearm regardless of carry laws, regardless of the law at all. Police can't be everywhere all the time. When police fail to protect and serve like they've been doing in recent months, then it's time to carry a firearm regardless.
@tomsuh13622 жыл бұрын
because of un-control infaltion, crime is going to go up across the country and people will be force to defend themselves becuase noboidy will trust the local police or DA knowing they can really do anything to criminals. This is how American will start it another civil war version 2.0.
@randyscrafts85752 жыл бұрын
@@oscarjohnson9156 "That day is for each of us to determine......" Did you read that part? You are only one person.
@randyscrafts85752 жыл бұрын
@@oscarjohnson9156 😂😂😂😂 Unreal.
@neilmuir35032 жыл бұрын
The police just shoot people who havr guns, gives them a grest excuse. The cops are a big part of the gucking problem
@davemiller60552 жыл бұрын
732 likes 21 dislikes. That's almost 35 to 1 in support of the decision.
@kittikins12 жыл бұрын
That's the number of gun nuts in this crazy country
@r.pmcmurphy66932 жыл бұрын
@@kittikins1 Wanting to maintain the right to protect yourself has no correlation with mental illness. Relying on someone else to protect you in this crazy world is just foolish.
@steveg22772 жыл бұрын
@@kittikins1 This country has made very clear what it believes in and proves Democrats aren’t in the majority - they just never shut the fuck up. Move to China. Byeeee
@cwg92382 жыл бұрын
@@kittikins1 its insane to believe you shouldnt have the right to defend yourself. the condition even has a name, its called masochism. you dont get to call anyone else a nut.
@RelentlessOhiox2 жыл бұрын
Someone can divide holy balls! /golfclap
@machocomacho9312 Жыл бұрын
Next: Real prison sentences for violent criminals and thieves/burglars.
@freetoplayaccount34872 жыл бұрын
This is an obvious win you wanna know why. You can’t overturn constitution law the the highest law ever.
@airbender95932 жыл бұрын
Also most deadliest law ever…
@microbehunter75842 жыл бұрын
@@airbender9593 no that was roe vs. Wade.
@fuzzywuzzy13552 жыл бұрын
Uh, constitutional amendments can be changed.
@freetoplayaccount34872 жыл бұрын
@@fuzzywuzzy1355 Supreme Court holds an oath to protect it. Good luck with that
@fuzzywuzzy13552 жыл бұрын
@@freetoplayaccount3487the constitution can be changed or updated. It’s a fact
@emojimr44272 жыл бұрын
Joe Biden telling Americans about commons sense ...is a contradiction in itself 😂😅🤣
@kevinsumner15452 жыл бұрын
Russian bot account. Not even trying to hide it.
@craignelson32432 жыл бұрын
The same can be said of trump.
@clickclack80812 жыл бұрын
@@kevinsumner1545 Hi Russian Bot 🖐️
@monstermachine16012 жыл бұрын
@@craignelson3243 oh please, Joe Biden is the biggest dummy ever elected, probably anywhere. The guy with no prior experience did a better job than he is doing.
@emojimr44272 жыл бұрын
@@craignelson3243 lmao hope you enjoying high gas prices high inflation your savings becoming non existent increase in crime do you feel safe ...illegals and sex traffic on the rise for the little kids ... multiple wars more government tested / approved vaccines that you have to sign a liability waver in order for manufacturer too not be sued.... Higher taxes ....😂😅🤣 You'll take all that instead of having Trump or someone like trump in office .. Good luck in life ....
@mickpratt83272 жыл бұрын
I want to know what the Mayor and Governor expect the average New Yorker to do to protect themselves in NYC. You couldn't conceal carry without special circumstances, blackjacks are illegal, brass or plastic knuckles are illegal, you cant have a knife on you with a blade longer than an infants pinky and Mace can't be legally shipped into NY State. So how then are we supposed to defend ourselves against the onslaught of crime in your city?
@Lickicker2 жыл бұрын
why do you think theres so much crime?
@chuxtuff2 жыл бұрын
Call that "gun violence" term instead "New York violence" as it's the same thing especially so if you happen to live in New York!!
@grekygrek2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm its almost like all those things were put in place to work with each other to make sure certain folk die and certain folk remain "free".... Or not incarcerated
@slimyjimmy15892 жыл бұрын
You dont, and that's why new York sucks, currently living in CT but gonna move to to the south or Midwest first chance I get.
@tatianaramos61932 жыл бұрын
Vote better.
@johnj93592 жыл бұрын
May issue gun permit laws have always been deeply racist, sexist, and classist. If you want to restrict who can carry then it needs to be done in such a way so as to not disproportionately disenfranchise black people, women, or poor people. When the only people who can get a carry permit are rich white dudes you have a broken system. This ruling is a great step forward in breaking down the discriminatory legal framework that has held back marginalized communities.
@cosmonaut41702 жыл бұрын
Bro what are you on rn?? 🤣 And can i get some??
@fallencantgetup30732 жыл бұрын
I think we should only separate it as politician and citizen. Politicians are allowed every gun under the sun to protect their arse yet they consistently want to take away citizens access to guns so they cannot oppose the politicians and the crime waves they allow.
@A_Bunch_of_Savages2 жыл бұрын
The government should not decide who is not worthy of defending their lives.
@xSP3CTREx2 жыл бұрын
You have reading comprehension issues. This is about Concealed Carry permits. Proving 'Why do you need to defend yourself' is the most racist, elitist attitude you could have.
@c0ya12 жыл бұрын
@@CC-qb6pf Hell, this past year alone, black and brown Americans buying guns jacked up through the roof. Maybe we want to keep ourselves, our communities, and our loved ones safe from thugs, if the cops wouldn't do their job.
@ClockworkGearhead2 жыл бұрын
"The right to bear arms contradicts the constitution." This president _needs to go._
@MrOlivier19672 жыл бұрын
However, the second amendment only applies to a well-regulated militia, so if we decide to apply the second amendment as it is written, everyone can say goodbye to their guns.
@ClockworkGearhead2 жыл бұрын
@@MrOlivier1967 Incorrect. The right to bear arms _and_ the right to form militias are _separate rights_ contained in the amendment. Their wording does not overlap. Thanks for playing.
@chazluckey2 жыл бұрын
@@MrOlivier1967 Too bad for your opinion that is not what previous Supreme Court rulings have said.
@bsharrard86522 жыл бұрын
@@MrOlivier1967 Aw you mad bruh?
@sandyoday98522 жыл бұрын
@@MrOlivier1967 fool...WE ARE THE MILITIA...LEARN TO INTERPRET...
@jimthompson34222 жыл бұрын
Good decision and it follows constitutional rights of second amendment
@tomsuh13622 жыл бұрын
Is needed across the whole country because of inflation, crime of every kind will skyrocketed. They steall your whole car or steal your catalytic convertor or steal your gas. They will break into your nice home when you are out of town so they might steal your stuff ot just become suateers in your own home. Thsi country is going out of control.
@pankenny21442 жыл бұрын
Finally someone make it right
@me-hk4ic2 жыл бұрын
New york has some of the most strict gun laws in the country and has some of the most gun violence so adding another law might not help.
@bsharrard86522 жыл бұрын
This judgement is about removing a bad law!
@uabforfindingthisbutalr64642 жыл бұрын
if atleast 20% of ppl are armed that will do a massive difference with all these shootings.. because that would mean that shooters will now have to have in mind that they could get shot from multiple people instead of knowing the fact that almost nobody has a gun in public now
@victorjcano2 жыл бұрын
A lot of shooters are hoping they will get shot. They wanna go out guns blazing. The problem is when everybody pulls out there pieces who the hell is going to know who the good guy in the bad guy is? This is pure fucking insanity
@bsharrard86522 жыл бұрын
@@victorjcano You are the only confused individual here! Try not to be so angry. You'll feel better lol
@victorjcano2 жыл бұрын
@@bsharrard8652WELL EXCUSE ME BUT IT'S HARD NOT TO BE ANGRY WHEN 19 LITTLE CHILDREN HAVE THEIR FACS SHOT OFF BY A WEAPON OF THAT SHOULDN'T BE IN THE HANDS OF CIVILIANS IN THE FIRST PLACE
@CaneFu2 жыл бұрын
As a progressive Democrat and gun owner I am in agreement with this ruling.
@lettheflamestakeover17932 жыл бұрын
Nancy pelosi like nazi's therefore you (maybe) do too, it's about time to switch sides to the good side brother😂that means fully no more 🌈men in women sports!
@CaneFu2 жыл бұрын
@@CC-qb6pf I see you would rather be an enemy than a fellow American.
@CaneFu2 жыл бұрын
@@CC-qb6pf So you think Social Security and Medicare is "progressive nonsense"? Democrats gave that to us and Republicans are trying to take it away.
@John115Yonkers2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Supreme Court! 😍😍😍
@paulmartinez83372 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful thing! People who think with their brain not emotionally driven.
@Justin-Outdoors2 жыл бұрын
Being a Republican in New York is like being an ice cream scoop in the Mojave
@Justin-Outdoors2 жыл бұрын
@Donald Thorpe perfect! I once was attacked while getting my trailer for a move. Called the cops they did nothing -California
@DanO1819192 жыл бұрын
Outstanding!!!
@theekiddunknown60692 жыл бұрын
I only imagine what our fathers who wrote the constitution would think about all this😭🤔
@ano19622 жыл бұрын
“Well regulated militia”
@bobbydigital30612 жыл бұрын
They’d be good with it
@Deathcylance2 жыл бұрын
They DID think about it... that's why they put "... shall not be infringed." At the end of the 2nd amendment 😏😎🇺🇸🔫
@ham54832 жыл бұрын
They would have taken care of these tyrants 100+ years ago
@ClockworkGearhead2 жыл бұрын
They'd send a letter to the King and tell him to take the US back.
@christinapomponio64522 жыл бұрын
I'm usually left leaning but I agree with this decision.
@americapride2 жыл бұрын
No matter Left or Right! If we are Real Americans, you are fully entitled US Constitution. Our The People duty is protect and respect the rights in Constitution, including 2A
@raiz912 жыл бұрын
This is not about left or right, is to protect ourselves and our families.
@slimyjimmy15892 жыл бұрын
imagine new York has strict gun laws and still has a high crime rate, who woulda thunk.
@maryammaghodas95272 жыл бұрын
New York State is 26th in violent crimes and 9th lowest in all crimes - so you’re just wrong. Do some research with your “thunking”
@tomsuh13622 жыл бұрын
Just like Chicago, Philli, LA, Camden, Baltimore , Washington DC Oakland, you know anywhere where is strict gun laws and poor people you will have high crime.
@neilmuir35032 жыл бұрын
Proof? Trust me bro, fox news says it
@neilmuir35032 жыл бұрын
@Culture 25-8 people also dont realize how often gun owners turn the guns on themselves. Turns out giving people a tool designed to kill makes it super easy to kill yourself. Who would have predicted right?
@neilmuir35032 жыл бұрын
@Culture 25-8 yeah i know people that have failed like 5 times, and believe me, thry really fucking tried. My cousin had tried before and been stopped, but one day she took her brothers service pistol and well, they are tools deisigned exactly for this reason after all.
@ktgames6640 Жыл бұрын
hear me out if a robber robbed 10 stores but no one had guns to shoot back at him he would rob 10 more. now that we have some of our rights back we will stop them and show them we wont stand for this robbing anymore.
@laketrump67682 жыл бұрын
SCOTUS got it EXACTLY right !
@anthonywalden30292 жыл бұрын
Shoutout to Justices Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett for upholding the ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION and derailing the PUSSIFICATION of Gun Control by Joe Biden and the Far Left. You people are the REAL MVPs. 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 Another bites the dust baby 😎😎😎😎😎😎
@marz10542 жыл бұрын
Too bad I have an A2 felony.. I will never be able to legally own a gun here in NYC… But I definitely support this law & every law abiding citizen should have the right to own!! 💯
@nilst3472 жыл бұрын
Creality Ender-3 Pro. All you need. plus some filament.
@cosmonaut41702 жыл бұрын
Sucks to hear that What did u do tho?
@marz10542 жыл бұрын
@@cosmonaut4170 I was part of a heroin ring in brooklyn.
@louisedgewood98392 жыл бұрын
My reason for getting a firearm, "it's my right, bish"
@andrewfrodo20862 жыл бұрын
Well Mr. President your wrong. I have a right to defend myself and requiring as NY did was an extra hurdle that made it harder for law abiding citizens to get a permit for a weapon to protect myself and my family. When a person or a criminal wants a gun can go down to the corner and buy a gun or weapon out of a trunk. Making it harder and against our USA constitution. It is a right!
@Scortd2 жыл бұрын
Not sure what your rant is about? NY didn't restrict people from purchasing a firearm, it had special requirements for people to carry them on the street. Yes, an extra requirement, but it would seem to me that a law-abiding citizen who wants to carry a concealed weapon should spend a good day or two coming up with a reasonable and logical reason to justify carrying the weapon. Is your complaint, the having to take the time to think of a valid reason to carry a gun you desire to carry so badly?? Also, the 2A says the right to bear, basically own a firearm, it actually says nothing about walking around outside your property with one.
@PamoftheElbers2 жыл бұрын
@@Scortd Well, that's confusing....why don't the ones who steal, purchase illegally, etc. have to follow those rules as well? They must have different rules than the law-abiding citizens? What gives?
@Scortd2 жыл бұрын
@@PamoftheElbers A huge problem in this country is people who want to hold law enforcement and law biding citizens to the same standard as criminals. Criminals are criminals because they don't follow the rules and no one expects them too. If you find the solution that makes criminals care about the law then I'm sure you will be given honors and riches beyond your wildest dreams. The non criminal element should be held to a higher standard and should welcome the responsibilities along with the right to own weapons. There are a lot of non-criminal people out there that shouldn't own a firearm despite their "right" to be able too; for a number of reasons. Majority of offenders of mass shootings were not criminals before killing a bunch of people. Yet a few provisions, such as a two day wait, an age requirement, or mandatory use of a FFL for a private sell, may have given the individual a day, month, or year to rethink what was going on in their life and not commit the horrendous act. I'm not for the banning of military style guns or large cap mags, but I see nothing wrong with having to be 21 to buy one or waiting 2 days before taking it home. A sensible and responsible gun owner should want and insure that other like minded safe and responsible people are buying guns instead of nuts who do stupid and horrible things with them and shed more bad light on the gun community.
@Hello69142 жыл бұрын
He got that right, “Lives are on the line!”.
@joytoyouandme45932 жыл бұрын
The life you save may be your own.
@cwg92382 жыл бұрын
@@joytoyouandme4593 the cops are obviously only good for coming to pick up your body. you are your actual first line of defense.
@nogenetherapy79122 жыл бұрын
Good call SCOTUS.
@eponz43542 жыл бұрын
Every Citizen has the right to defend themselves. Good for you NY. Love from Texas
@FBCxUNKNOWN2 жыл бұрын
I love all the leftists just screaming “but it says well regulated!!!!!😭” and don’t even know what it actually means🤣
@MrOlivier19672 жыл бұрын
We already have it, a well regulated militia is the National Guards.
@FBCxUNKNOWN2 жыл бұрын
@@MrOlivier1967 That’s not what well regulated means, and it doesn’t say there has to be a singular one. Try again smart guy.
@anniehopkins84702 жыл бұрын
@@FBCxUNKNOWN ... "All able-bodied citizens eligible by law to be called on to provide military service supplementary to the regular armed forces." That's what the oxford dictionary says
@deebee45752 жыл бұрын
If any of you actually read the decision that came out the other day, they addressed that whole clause in the second amendment. There is no requirement to belong to any group to exercise your Second Amendment right.
@israelarana52832 жыл бұрын
I am so ashamed I voted for Biden. Never again will I ever vote Democrat!! Honest law abiding citizens have the right to defend themselves!! The right to bear arms is constitutional!!
@PamoftheElbers2 жыл бұрын
We're so glad you smartened up!!!!!!!
@anniehopkins84702 жыл бұрын
You are amazing! The "walk of shame" is never easy... and it's one of the main reasons that we can't move past so many difficulties in our society... narcissists who double down instead of just saying "I fucked up". Kudos to you sir!
@KaoMinerva2 жыл бұрын
Very stupid to have voted for him.
@kw25192 жыл бұрын
Dude, a lot of us had to vote for that old jackass. The alternative was a fucking traitor who tried to overthrow our government. You should be pissed that we only have two options and that they both suck. Every fucking time. It’s always either a shit sandwich or a turd smoothie. Gun control is literally the only topic I agree with the right on. I really hope we get a better set of options. I’ll lose my shit if it’s a Trump v Biden election again…but that looks unlikely with the trials going on around his insurrection attempt.
@NYC-2-BKK2 жыл бұрын
This is a good day for all 2A supporters and law abiding New Yorkers
@bladebrown43412 жыл бұрын
I'm a NYC resident thank you US Supreme Court for upholding the constitution so I can protect myself
@Bugjuck2 жыл бұрын
Living in NYC specifically the Bronx is enough reason to carry…need not to say more
@jeffhester14432 жыл бұрын
Oooooo. Legal citizens and armed and obeying the law, OH MY!
@neilmuir35032 жыл бұрын
How do you seperate the legal and law abiding from the "criminals"
@johnhuston6502 жыл бұрын
Thank God and conservatives for our rights to self protect.
@TL-wy1nk2 жыл бұрын
I agree. I hope they allow constitutional carry in Illinois. Crime would go down a great deal. Chicago is out of control.
@skimaskog25552 жыл бұрын
Kudos to NYC! Self defense is our right!
@kwacou42792 жыл бұрын
Legal gun holders are not the problem, illegal guns are. I live in NYC don't own a gun and have no problem with legal gun holders. Guns aren't the problem, MFers with illegal guns are. I approve this decision.
@rongyu42802 жыл бұрын
That demon who shot down uvalde elementary school obtain the gun legally. So you are siding with this monster?
@kwacou42792 жыл бұрын
@@rongyu4280 And the demons shooting up Chicago, NYC, L.A. every day, especially weekends, obtained them legally? No , even mayor Adams said illegal guns are flooding NYC and committing murder in our streets, not legal guns.
@rongyu42802 жыл бұрын
The governor and the mayor gave their opinions earlier today. They both are very disappointed with the supremes court decisions. I don’t believe any of them including president is supporting the Supreme Court decision
@rongyu42802 жыл бұрын
Adding to that the guy who shoot up the sandy hook elementary school got the gun from his mom who obtained the weapon legally ending up shot by her own legal weapon and gun
@kwacou42792 жыл бұрын
@@rongyu4280 Sandy hook occurred more than a decade ago. What I stated about illegal gun violence is happening everyday.
@THEONEANDONLYBLACKLEGO2 жыл бұрын
With great power comes great responsibility. Use it wisely
@OvernightCountFraud20242 жыл бұрын
"overturns" NO, decides NY law is UNCONSTITUTIONAL
@robertpayne27172 жыл бұрын
Great decision by supreme court
@bsharrard86522 жыл бұрын
The Mayor was big mad he's not allowed to step all over the Rights of his constituents any longer lol
@anonymous-er6hw2 жыл бұрын
Biden quotes "the Supreme Court lack of common sense" Me: Biden lacks the braincells for common cense.
@paulrodriguez1282 Жыл бұрын
Now the good guys can defend themselves against the bad guys who already carry and don't care about the Laws.
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
Justice Samuel Alito: "How is that consistent with the core right to self-defense which is protected by the second Amendment?" - Any Supreme Court Justice that does not know the Constitution (including the Bill of Rights) and cannot recite it (either by memory or by reading a book like those carried by members of Congress) should be terminated immediately. The second Amendment says absolutely nothing -- not a single word -- about self-defense. I can't imagine there is anyone unaware at this point, but if there is, here is the full text of the second Amendment: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The second Amendment is explicitly referring to arming the well-regulated Militia, which in modern day is collectively the Armed Forces of the United States, not private citizens.
@cosmonaut41702 жыл бұрын
Wow Someone fail both English AND History class
@anniehopkins84702 жыл бұрын
"All able-bodied citizens eligible by law to be called on to provide military service supplementary to the regular armed forces." - oxford dictionary You literally just lied in your comment... "which in modern day means the armed forces because I want it too" The definition covers that... and you are a child playing at "adulting"
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
@@cosmonaut4170 "Someone fail both English AND History class" - It's okay, I'm sure if you study real hard, you can pass them the next time around.
@mrc89412 жыл бұрын
Under the field “specified danger” just put Government.
@cosmonaut41702 жыл бұрын
Libertarian spotted Opinion upheld 😎👍
@jamesgreen99542 жыл бұрын
The law never made any sense because no one knows when a violent criminal is going to assault you and try to take your life. Just like when a criminal try’s to take a cops life, he or she has no idea when they will have to defend their life with deadly force.
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
Given the number of times we have seen police shoot and otherwise assault unarmed, non-combative people in recent history, you aren't helping your case by pointing to police as an example of "good" or "legitimate" use of firearms.
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
@@jamesgreen9954 "Ok Karen" - Wow. So not wanting police to shoot unarmed people makes me a "Karen"? Someone has a serious comprehension issue. And for the record, I don't watch CNN (or Fox or MSNBC or any of the other news channels). I watch some KZbin videos from various local and national organizations, but I am not a frequent viewer of any of them. Perhaps you would do better if you stopped watching a single outlet and varied your intake.
@Anthony-qu7qd2 жыл бұрын
This is such a small win, I can only hope that they get rid of the rest of the unconstitutional bs
@Yourdeadmeat692 жыл бұрын
You don't have to answer the question do you feel particularly threatened in order to be able to qualify to carry a gun outside the home in New York. This rule makes it self-evident you should feel threatened outside your home in New York now!
@iCANT_BELIEVE_YOU_SAID_THAT2 жыл бұрын
They're trying to pull a fast one by prohibit firearms in the a "public" subway. These people just can't take the loss.
@Nootson082 жыл бұрын
"The supreme court ruling a law is unconstitutional, is unconstitutional". Yeah I don't think so, Biden.
@nomore61672 жыл бұрын
Next time, it might be a good idea to actually read the Constitution before you post an "I don't like you, so I'm going to say you're wrong" comment regarding the Constitution. Also, let's not pretend that the Supreme Court is nonpartisan and that the Justices make their decisions based on law, precedent, and the Constitution, because they don't; for high-profile topics, at least, they make their decisions based entirely on politics.
@dashermorgan Жыл бұрын
Our lives are on the line every time we take a flight and decide to drive in our car in traffic. What are you going to do pass laws that say that we are now prohibited from driving a motor vehicle🤣🤣🤣
@guiltyuntilproveninnocent.2 жыл бұрын
Now all we need is a stand your ground law.
@gonzchi2 жыл бұрын
As much as I support implementing objective gun control , I agree with this decision to eliminate subjective criteria. Law has to be clear and equal for all.
@Alex420alldayz2 жыл бұрын
They only want to control minorities having guns , big cities with big minority population have the strictest gun law
@neilmuir35032 жыл бұрын
Ok so no states rights sick
@mattm5972 жыл бұрын
YES!! A WIN FOR THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. A WIN FOR THE LAW-ABIDING AMERICAN PEOPLE!!
@bsharrard86522 жыл бұрын
And BIG WIN for Conservatives!
@titosantana82422 жыл бұрын
The SCOTUS is awful. This heinous ruling is another reason why President Biden needs to pack the court.
@corduroyslippers58082 жыл бұрын
Good.
@vulgardisplay54672 жыл бұрын
I thought the supreme court supported states rights, that only applies for roe vs wade?
@sandyoday98522 жыл бұрын
Not when the Law VIOLATES the CONSTITUTION...USE YOUR NOODLE...OR BRAIN IN CASE U CANT FOLLOW
@vulgardisplay54672 жыл бұрын
@@sandyoday9852 don't type in all caps, makes u appear angry or really old. Personally I think everyone should carry 2 pistols strapped to their hips, and an AR on their back. If women's rights weren't protected, I don't see how guns are that's all, logic
@rmac27862 жыл бұрын
@@vulgardisplay5467 overturning roe v. Wade allows states to determine individually what their abortion laws are. Am I missing something?
@vulgardisplay54672 жыл бұрын
@@rmac2786 guns are greater than women? Am I missing something. Understand, I don't really care about the issue. Just pointing out the hypocrisy. Seems our government continues to slide into something unrecognizable, I'm just enjoying the spiral
@NanoT_T2 жыл бұрын
When a law is in clear violation of your constitutionally protected rights, they have the authority to strike it down. Abortion is nowhere in the constitution, not even mentioned, so it's not protected and should be a state issue. 50 choices.