It is a beautiful interpretation. I personally love how Eric Heidsieck plays it (much faster), but for copyright reasons that version has been removed from youtube :-(
@francescaemc22 жыл бұрын
grazie
@davidstuart4018 жыл бұрын
Played this piece with all of 20 errors and still placed first! The others must have a verybad day.
@나옹-f9g7 ай бұрын
8:11
@billp35988 жыл бұрын
While I don't think this is a midi sequence, (there are parts where the velocity is not all the same, as near the end of movements), there are far too many mistakes for it to be Richter. It may be a live performance by an amateur who is very good, but who is trying pass for Richter and see if anyone notices.
@user-fu7zf4ck9z3 жыл бұрын
You‘d be surprised how many mistakes Richter can play in baroque piano literature
@billp35983 жыл бұрын
@@user-fu7zf4ck9z true but not that many
@orhankeskin32196 жыл бұрын
Tek kelimeyle müthiş.
@LuqueSky8611 жыл бұрын
Me cuesta creer que esta grabación sea Richter, la verdad...
@TheGatotomas8 жыл бұрын
No way richter!!!
@adrianthorburn34356 жыл бұрын
Definitely not Richter,still wish I could play like that,like the speed it's played at,Richters 1996 version sounds more refined.
@achantus111 жыл бұрын
Many small mistakes.
@chystokletov10 жыл бұрын
Fake, it sounds nothing like Richter.
@gevorgyanarek10 жыл бұрын
It's a very Richter
@stevevaughan7878 жыл бұрын
First thing I noticed was that the velocity of the notes are ALL THE SAME. That's a dead giveaway that it's sequenced. It sounds TOO perfect. The notes are too staccato. You don't hear any sustain pedal resonance. It's not live it's a MIDI sequence. Good try.
@secretmission76078 жыл бұрын
This is definitely not sequenced! If it were the 'crushed' notes would have been edited out, for one thing! What makes it just a tiny bit 'sequenced sounding' is the uniformity of the piano sound throughout its velocity range and the compression on the recording... Doesn't sound like Richter though!