Swarovski STX 65mm 85mm 95mm Comparison Review

Comparing Swarovski's top end spotting scope.

[@mikemcdonald6795]

FYI the 65 & 85 have the same field of view. The size of the objective does not affect the FOV. The 65 & 85 have the same focal length therefore the same magnification and FOV.

[@armandomadajr2271]

Mike McDonald thx I just pick up my new 65 ..:)

[@ewakarl1]

Mike McDonald ä

[@jps101574]

I was just going to comment the same thing

[@sweatyxclips8098]

Can you make a video so we can see how good it is with zooming

[@ryaniam22]

65 objectives all day. You don't really notice brightness loss except in the last 15 minutes of daylight. Not really needed. It's not like your going to go get that sheep 3 miles away in that last 15 minutes. If you can't see it with a binocular in last light you aren't seriously going to track it down anyways (or within 1 km or less max).

[@XJarhead360]

Is that your equipment or loaners from Swarovski 'cause you have well over $12,000 in equipment if it's yours.

[@michaelaa1674]

He is obviously peddling the product.

[@enriquejaramillo4244]

How much?

[@Trudeau-is-Stalin]

If you want to blow your life savings to see the balls on a goat 1000 yards away, buy a Swarovski. If you want a phenomenal scope to see a fraction less color and detail that doesn't really make a difference and more importantly spend a 1000$ or less, buy a vortex viper scope.

[@brianthompson9485]

You buy a vortex for the warranty... because you’re going to need it. Lol

[@feliciakarlsson6086]

I bought my swarovski atx 65mm for like 1200 usd. Im extremley happy with it. And i dont think the difference justify the price difference of like 3000 usd

[@TheBaseballking23]

A vortex spotter is about useless past 50x. I had a razor hd 20-60x85. My swaro glass isn’t even a comparison…