Thank you so much for your great lecture! It helped me a lot in understanding what DP is !
@sammasingi70485 ай бұрын
You're the GOAT (Greatest of all time)
@sammichang26754 ай бұрын
well explained!
@TeenYMiley5 жыл бұрын
thank you sooooo much! your videos are saving my future hahaha
@mustafaelhadri59763 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir for your help, l appreciate it! A question please! why is the the adjunct (standing over there) is a sister to N' and a daughter to N' and not a sister to D' and daughter to D' since we can say the man's hat?
@TorstigHjalmr2 жыл бұрын
Would this then allow a sentence such as 'the man the hat'?
@aroundworldnews Жыл бұрын
😢
@infinitafenix31536 жыл бұрын
You give wonderful explanations, uncommon in this subject that can get very confusing. Many thanks for the good job.
@omaimaarfan34675 жыл бұрын
Please can you explain why u put “standing over there” as a CP? My book (which is the same book you use) says its a VP.
@bluemoon49615 жыл бұрын
standing over there = that is standing over there, and "that" is a Complementizer, i think
@TheGuyAlwaysOnTime4 жыл бұрын
@@bluemoon4961 aww shit you are right
@abdullahasaad73672 жыл бұрын
@@bluemoon4961 a reduced relative clause.
@oumyaya9756 жыл бұрын
Your videos are very helpful. Thank you very much for sharing this. I have a question though, is there any difference between TP (tensed phrase) and IP (inflectional phrase) ?
@MrEmBerna5 жыл бұрын
If I got this, IP should justify aspects in the behaviour of the subject (which results as a Specifier of IP), in the behaviour of Adverbs (which follow Auxiliaries but always precede the verb when there is no Aux - the only exception is the verb "to be" but, guess what? Some theorists argue that it is a verb of pure Inflection, i.e. it plays no role as a head of a VP in copular sentences) and other things. When you talk about IP, you tend to put it as the root node, and more generally, as a node always c-commanding the VP. A more complex theory within the GB is that IP is actually made of Agreement Phrase + Tense Phrase. I don't know much more at the moment, I read divulgative texts of theorists of the Minimalist Program, and for some reason the TP appears as the root node, so evidence perhaps led them to throw away the hypothesis of the AgrP as a root node (in the GB some theorists argued that there are two AgrP, one for the subject and one for the DO, in order to justify the fact that the verb manages to assign to both Case and theta-roles).
@cankutbayhan4 жыл бұрын
09:42 in the full expansion including the determiner along with the possessive...how do we define the functioning Head, coz there happens two different and seemingly independent or idk like functionally fulfilled terminals both as Determiners (the and 's)...is it possible to prioritize a head, indicating the man as the head or is it the informative bit that the 's provides with? ... thx a lot...and if possible, is it a complementizer phrase at 10:53 'standing over there'...ty so much.
@suzandilaratokac2692 Жыл бұрын
at 8.03 minute you added a DP to a DP, why don't we call it a D' instead it is an intermediat level. There already a DP above, can DP occour under a DP?