The AK-47 of the tank world. Simple, crude, ubiquitous... a thing of beauty!
@banditdelta71727 жыл бұрын
Patrick Bateman "Thing of beauty"? Nah man that's a plain Jane tank.
@volk45237 жыл бұрын
Nah, man. Perfectly good tank for its day.
@smilesthestormtrooper16137 жыл бұрын
Patrick Bateman ak-48 is better!
@thogyt7 жыл бұрын
smiles the stormtrooper AKM is better
@deptusmechanikus73627 жыл бұрын
Bunny Hop837 until Ak-103 comes in
@LordDarthHarry7 жыл бұрын
10:36 If War Thunder taught me anythign its that Russian engineers belive gun depression is western propaganda.
@TwixSvK5 жыл бұрын
when ur defending u can dig in and making the vehicle so small reduces its weight. for example leopard 1 is 40 tons while t55 is 36 tons while having much better armor
@shockwave62135 жыл бұрын
When you are building a tank design made for attack, gun depression isn't that much of a concern, because you pick where to strike.
@twandepan5 жыл бұрын
@@shockwave6213 you still have to fully expose the tank in order to fire if the terrain sin't urbanised. other tanks with good depression can hide their chasis behind a hill with only their turret sticking out. exposing yourselfs is bad in both an attacking and defending situation.
@silvesby5 жыл бұрын
@@shockwave6213 That's not really the reason. The primary reason is because of the lack of hills in Eastern Europe. If you're fighting on flat ground, gun depression is unnecessary. It can be seen in a lot of Soviet tank design, pre and post WW2.
@ronsee64585 жыл бұрын
Товарищ Сильвио still though gun depression is the main problem of Russian tank, great in other areas though
@Puzzoozoo7 жыл бұрын
The T-55 war horse will probably still be slugging it out on a battlefield somewhere when most of us are long dead.
@vcguerrilla64386 жыл бұрын
oh my fuckin god thats soooo deep
@leehongjin68845 жыл бұрын
The T-72 is being more prevalent in Africa and other nations who used the T-54/55. Though the T-54/55 can be upgraded to probably... 2nd generation MBT standards. It would never hold its own against even the earliest M1 variants with the 105mm.
@DESIBOY-fe7nm5 жыл бұрын
Probably on our graves. It'll roll.
@willpartridge68995 жыл бұрын
Lee Hong Jin but if your enemy has an AK it’ll do the job
@leehongjin68845 жыл бұрын
@@willpartridge6899 The Kalashnikov will never be an outdated weapon. My favourite tank is the T-72 and its improved variants like the M-84 or the "White Eagle"
@TedShatner107 жыл бұрын
A museum piece many decades old and never quite used to its full potential by Third World armies worldwide, but still a solid backbone to the Soviet armoured forces.
@ihatecabbage72706 жыл бұрын
TedShatner10 they are actually used to it's full potential and sometimes beyond it's capability, it's a World War II technology that are kept it in service that somehow works. You can't use it against modern tanks or anti-tank weapons and even modern auto cannon shells, but it can stop modern machine gun and rifles bullets. And Syrian Army was able to use it to beat ISIS, that says a lot.
@IronWarhorsesFun6 жыл бұрын
As far as I understand it's mainly used as a SPG these days due do it's cannon still having use against structures and fortifications. It's why you often see images of a guy with the firing lanyard outside the turret firing the gun. This also makes more space for the loader and gunner. Edit: sorry ACTUALLY that's the Ripcord T-34s being used by Huthis in Yemen.
@MrZiad326 жыл бұрын
+I HATE CABBAGE which one ? the free one or the Assad pigs
@IronWarhorsesFun6 жыл бұрын
TROLL!
@ihatecabbage72706 жыл бұрын
Mazen of Syria from your tone, you clearly on the side of the terrorist, so I see no point arguing with you...... So far in independent news network, life in Syria is returning to rebuild and reconciliation, Assad pig is no saint, but are we so prideful that bringing down that pig with same group of terrorist we funded while bombing them at the same time?
@TheAKgunner7 жыл бұрын
I love The Beast! The tank in the film was a Ti-67, a T-55 captured by Israel and modified with a Detroit Diesel engine with an American made transmission and new controls for the driver. It also got a 105mm L7 gun and Browning M1919 coaxial machine gun with a digital fire control system, and other modern (at the time) optics for the tank commander. It's really a rather interesting upgrade.
@TheAKgunner7 жыл бұрын
The Stoned Videogame Nerd Close. They took old Sherman tanks and replaced the medium velocity 75mm gun with a French-made copy of the Panther's high velocity L/70 gun, and later a French-made 105mm gun. Both tanks also got a Cummins diesel engine to replace the more flammable gasoline engine (something the crews greatly appreciated). They were the M50 (high velocity 75mm gun) and M51 (105mm gun) Isherman respectively.
@derekhenschel31915 жыл бұрын
@@TheAKgunner they mounted 150mm howitzers on Sherman's and used them as mobile artillery
@TheAKgunner5 жыл бұрын
@@derekhenschel3191 I believe you mean 105mm, not 150.
@derekhenschel31915 жыл бұрын
@@TheAKgunner nope I'll try and find you the picture of the thing the turret is wierd as fuck
@WizzRacing3 жыл бұрын
It wasn't captured by Israel.. It was captured by the Afghans..Then sold to Israel. As Soldier Of Fortune was selling Soviet Tanks, Helicopters anything they could get their hands on. To raise money for the Afghan army..I seen them sell Hind Helicopter missile launchers in Houston. At a Fund raiser. It was like the Wild West for arms dealers....
@Mister-Chief7 жыл бұрын
I always wondered why the Russians always built their tanks with that turret shape except for a few models, love the looks and it's story tho
@Dimetropteryx7 жыл бұрын
They didn't, though. Only the T-54/T-55 and T-62 had that general turret shape.
@potatoradio7 жыл бұрын
It was was to keep a low profile but also with the complex curves, *curve from bottom up, and round as well* increase the chance of a shot glancing off it the armor "slopes in 3 dimentions, not just 2D en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloped_armour . Versus the all but last slab sided WW2 types.
@Dimetropteryx7 жыл бұрын
+Chewbacca The turret itself, once you strip away the outer modules, is stretched hexagonal on the T-90. That is a departure from the squashed cylindrical on the T-64, T-72 and T-80 series, and further yet away from the half egg / dome shape of the T-55 and T-62.
@EstellammaSS7 жыл бұрын
It's based on experience in WW2, the soviets found this design to be the best, the Americans also borrowed the idea and tried it on the M48(they made it a lot taller tho). I suspect the reason this kind of design got abandoned is because it is hard to make composite armor into the shape, but that's just a guess I dunno.
@itzdanish56147 жыл бұрын
Mister Chief because it looks like a actual tank
@deathknight67 жыл бұрын
And 60 years later, its the MBT of Peru ... my country :)
@CharliMorganMusic6 жыл бұрын
Hieronymus VI I am sorry that your country only has T-55s
@user-br4qp4pw2o6 жыл бұрын
Well. ATGMs crews still gonna support them tanks so its ok
@Toxi-ed5js6 жыл бұрын
The polish used the t55 am1 to for 20 or 15 jears
@appleislander85366 жыл бұрын
RIP Republica del Peru 1879-2017
@pablodeleongonzalez47176 жыл бұрын
also in uruguay 250 units and a couple of m48 .....sad
@Mandrak7894 жыл бұрын
AK-47, MiG-21 and T-55. The most Iconic Soviet weapons of the Cold war.
@sufimuslimlion41144 жыл бұрын
Also some of the most influential, important and reliable weaponry in the world
@BorntoYeet Жыл бұрын
Don't forget rpg7 and Su-27
@MrPilgrimuk7 ай бұрын
Don't forget the Makarov and Dragunov. 😁
@13thSystem6 жыл бұрын
People love comparing this thing to modern Abrams tank because of the Iraq war but what they forget is this thing is cold war era technology and easily outclassed it's direct competitor, the M46 patton.
@d3adstarr3 жыл бұрын
My grandfather was a t55 gunner during the Indo Pak 1971 war He took part in the Battle of Basantar
@jamieoliver79473 ай бұрын
I'm totally ignorant to that. But my inner child thinks it's cool as fk that your grandad did that 😏💪🙌🙏
@thelittlestmig33947 жыл бұрын
Finland retired most of their fleet of T-54/55's in early 2000's and either scrapped them or sold them away. Few remain in service for use as OPFOR vehicles for training. One curiosity we used to have was Marksman turrets on T-55M hulls. They were designated ItPsv 90 and they looked wicked cool! Couple years ago FDF moved Marksman turrets on Leo 2 hulls which looks kinda neat too.
@Krasnoye1583 жыл бұрын
Interesting. I didn’t know a nation as wealthy as Finland would use those tanks up to the 2000s
@ravenouself4181 Жыл бұрын
@@Krasnoye158 that's how a country becomes wealthy - saving as much money as possible while investing in it's economy.
@Krasnoye158 Жыл бұрын
@@ravenouself4181 that's not how. Peace is the must-have condition for wealth to develop. If the circumstances demand then that money still have to be spent.
@leileijoker84657 жыл бұрын
You didn't mention that at least 1/4 of the T54/55 in the world are actually the Chinese type 59. Soviet sold the T 54 production line to China in the late 50s. Lots of the Iraqi T55s that got destroyed during desert storm are actually imported from China. Some of the type 59s are still in service today. Most of them are equipped with reactivate explosive armor and Chinese copy of L 7 105mm gun.
@MwRYum6 жыл бұрын
+Leilu Dai in August the CNTV have a segment that involves firing such tank gun...demo characteristics of various APFSDS head designs. kzbin.info/www/bejne/lXvcpomfg7Zmbbch3m18s
@vondertann82185 жыл бұрын
not only a 105 L7, but a 125mm smoothbore, yes a Type 59-125 :D
@beeffeter4565 жыл бұрын
I would consider them different tanks, just because of the separate production, but I can see how they are the literal exact same tank.
@derekhenschel31915 жыл бұрын
The type 62 is just a t55 that the Chinese fucked up
@tiborpurzsas21365 жыл бұрын
The famous picture of the tank man in Tiananmen square in 1989 has the Chinese type 59...
@cczevak53137 жыл бұрын
I worked with these tanks a long time ago. The biggest improvement of later Soviet Tanks, particularly the T-72, in my opinion is the situational awareness of the gunner. You can't see shit inside that turret.
@TheRagingStorm987 жыл бұрын
I love the T series. It's quite amazing to see how the different versions have been modernised of all the T series types. From Romania to Ukraine and other nations and the western nations modifications made to some T series tanks that fell into their use. Truly the T series tanks are the Ak series if the tank world.
@ChristopherPBacon15 жыл бұрын
T-Series... you disgust me
@chrissilva6615 жыл бұрын
US Army Armor (tank) officer 1986 - 2012 trained on M1 series tanks. Deployed to Afghanistan in 2008/09 as an advisor to the Afghan National Army (ANA). I was the senior advisor to the 3rd Kandak (battalion) 3rd Brigade, 201st Corp which was a tank unit. The ANA sure did have T-55's in active service in two of the three companies. The third company was T-62 while the fourth was infantry. We ordered head gaskets from a company in Czechoslovakia. T-55's had a compressed air starter but with a manual transmission could be started by towing them and popping the clutch. For a counter insurgency these tanks were perfect to set up vehicle checkpoints (VCP) and to take out machine gun emplacements inside caves and also as a show of force.
@wesleybullard94723 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite tanks of the Soviet design philosophy not due to its Effectiveness compared to modern main battle tanks but because despite its obsolescence it’s still holds its own against most things and gets the job done.
@1GTX13 жыл бұрын
Saw this bad boys moving on the main road in my village next to my house during air attacks by NATO when i was a kid in Serbia, my house was also near a bridge, i have no idea how it wasn't hit, there were 80 bridges that were taken out, but not the one near a main road.
@samuelkeller47457 жыл бұрын
The T-55 does have an NBC protection system, the t-54 however does not. Some of these T-54's were later converted to T-55 standard
@matt.s96077 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favourite vehicles! Thank you for making this and keep these up! :)
@kalle9117 жыл бұрын
a little fun factoid here: in 1979 Gaddafi planned to send 10 T-55s to Uganda, but Uganda lost the war while the tanks were en route, so they were redirected to Angola. But that ship docked in Durban instead. South Africa confiscated the tanks, and gave eight to Rhodesia. :P It made sense for South Africa to keep two for evaluation purposes - Cubans had T-55/62s in Angola later in 1980s.
@andylorentz32713 жыл бұрын
Not sure about the confiscated part but in Angola T54 and T55's were used
@kalle9113 жыл бұрын
@@andylorentz3271 I just found this post: samilhistory.com/2019/01/03/soviet-made-libyan-tanks-seized-by-south-africa-and-gifted-to-rhodesia/ fascinating
@andylorentz32713 жыл бұрын
@@kalle911 very interesting indeed!! Never knew this. Thanks for the link
@iivarilappalainen98367 жыл бұрын
I dont really understand all that much about tanks (except they are cool obviously), but i remember talking years ago with friend who i think served as gunner of T-55 here in Finland. They had just gotten the first Leopards to Finland which were supposed to replace those T-55's. He claimed me that they had lots of problems with the Leopards engines, while the T-55 would basically run on small rocks and leftover porridge. I hope the leopards issues have been solved since then, but i really do have to admire the brutal practicality and reliability that many soviet hardware had - sure they would uncomfortable, break apart time and again... but somehow you could pretty much always fix them with duct tape and iron wire whether it was tank, car, assault rifle or whatever.
@landerviguera95754 жыл бұрын
Revolutionary, simply, deadly, reliably.... A masterpiece.
@georgiaball37724 жыл бұрын
Glad to see your video is back mate!
@simonbarabash21515 жыл бұрын
Incredible balance of firepower, protection and mobility. The fact a tank that was on the drawing board when they were still fighting panzers is still somewhat relevant today (when upgraded) is an amazing testament to the engineers who designed this beast.
@metanumia7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another excellent and educational tank analysis video! I love learning as much as I can about the history of engineering, especially armored vehicles, and your channel is my favorite place to go for this information. :D Keep it up!
@ErnestJay887 жыл бұрын
T54/55 more like "pick up and fire" kind of Tank, it is low tech, doesn't have state of the art equipment, but it so easy to use, untrained soldiers doesn't need to read thousand pages of manual book to operate them, just jump in, turn the engine on, and start "tanking" or go straight to the battlefield.
@tankolad7 жыл бұрын
Ernest Jay That's not really true. It's got more tech under the hood than you'd assume.
@ErnestJay887 жыл бұрын
i knew, but T54/55 are not sophisticated "electronic combat warfare" like M1A2 SEP Abrams, Leopard 2 Revolution, or Challenger II tanks. Except radio equipment and thermal sight, everything are just "as manual as 1950's technology", unless the operator upgrade that tank with modern equipment like ERA protection, digital combat system (DCS module), SHTORA (anti missile defense system), ARENA protection system, etch.
@tankolad7 жыл бұрын
You cannot compare a tank made in the 50's with a tank made in the 80's. Case closed.
@DNS-Freakz6 жыл бұрын
Ernest Jay Dude do you Compare Modern Tanks against a 50's tank?
@giggling_boatswain3 жыл бұрын
That's all right. The same principle applies to the T-34. Then they need to put an ordinary rural tractor driver inside the tank and he must go right away. Repair in an open field on their own was also taken into account by Russian engineers. This is no longer the case today. Solid computers and electronics inside.
@ThorandSharon7 жыл бұрын
Good, informative overview of the development of the T-54/55 series tanks. Thank you for sharing!
@IronPhysik7 жыл бұрын
I think when you are in a poor country and dont expect the enemy to have tanks or many AT weapons such a tank will be a pain in the ass to fight and truely frightening to encounter. for excample in africa, what would you do when the enemy warlord gets hit hands on a T-55? correct, you have most likely no Anti tank weapons at hand and get slaughtered by this tank.
@smeg7ds7 жыл бұрын
Like literally every insurgent group has at least one RPG-7. T-55, scary? Yes, but not indestructible.
@IronPhysik7 жыл бұрын
remember that even the RPG-7 can be rare in poor countrys. true, they are some, but also not many.
@MrTangolizard7 жыл бұрын
Iron_Physik Somalia is one of the poorest country's in Africa and they have thousands of RPGs
@IronPhysik7 жыл бұрын
now go on and do the math, number of RPGs / surface area of the country = amount of RPGs per surface area. I bet that this number is verry low, meaning that having multiple RPG rockets on hand is not verry likely. infact, even in somalia a group of warriors usually has just 1 RPG. wich is VERRY limited to kill tanks and to risky.
@smeg7ds7 жыл бұрын
Yes, but the chance of having a set number of RPGs per amount of area is also very low. Believe it or not, but when a war is fought, most of the troops, and as such RPGs are on the front line.
@ranger175a2w4 жыл бұрын
Man I just love the intro for your videos man it's great!!!
@lebowskiunderachiever35916 жыл бұрын
New sub here . I recently binged on your excellent videos and re-learned one thing , "NEVER UNDERESTIMATE AN OPPONENT AND THEIR CAPABILITY " . This being said from an former M1-a1 crewman and cav scout soon after ... Admittedly the older Soviet tanks are dated by todays standards but hell , these days there is no telling what is in support of them or what tactics will be used . Sorry for rant , just respect for warriors that wear different uniforms .
@lebowskiunderachiever35916 жыл бұрын
@8:40 + I am reminded of the time of being a tanker ... The good times that you had with your buddies and how bad it sucks to have something f-up .
@michaelfurgessons28967 жыл бұрын
Well since we are going back Matsimus do Leopard 1! (main tank for many poor current countries) And also love the comedic videos! Best regards m8!
@Katarinarabbit7 жыл бұрын
Greg Makropoulos Germany is a poor country WAT😂😂😂😂 god I love the Internet.
@michaelfurgessons28967 жыл бұрын
ARC-77 Fordo No m8 Greece is. We have a fea leopard 2 but the majority of our tanks are leopard 1
@qwerty-gc8tn7 жыл бұрын
Εμένα πάντος λογικό μου φαίνεται να είναι σε υπηρεσία περισσότερα Leopard 1 από ότι 2 εφόσον τα 2 είναι πολύ πιο καινούργια . Επίσης στον πόλεμο προτιμώ να είμαι σε ένα leopard 1 παρά να έχω ως μόνη άμυνα ένα αυτόματο όπλο.
@sirbader17 жыл бұрын
Greg Makropoulos what's funny is that the Germans and Greeks despise each other to this day over dubya dubya duece.
@scudb55097 жыл бұрын
What poor countries are with Leo 1? Only EU countries and some others use it. The main tank for poor countries is T-55A
@dartharpy94043 жыл бұрын
👍love your work
@mmmbrunommm37 жыл бұрын
Ok, I don't know why your username says 'gaming' but your vids are very cool. YT recommended it and I'm glad I found your channel +1 sub man
@gerardarmstrong72547 жыл бұрын
Always look forward to your vids thanks man
@dustinshadle7326 жыл бұрын
my dad likes your channel. too bad he refuses to get internet service again. hes in a place with only one option, and he refuses to get ripped off by them again. he had lower speeds than i have, and paid the same ammount. hes in a city of 5000 people, im in a sitty of 230,000. he said this brought back memories of his education of enemy tanks in the mid 70's. he remembered crawling all over the T-55, and comparing it to the M60a.
@flashers.52124 жыл бұрын
I’m studying armoured operations during the first Iraq war. I’m autistic, if I could say something nice about this download I would. Your information about the T55 has helped me very much. Thank you.
@kazimierzspaczynski74013 жыл бұрын
Thank You. Since small child I liked tanks, ships and airplaines. It was long, long ago. Greetings from Texas.
@doggy47213 жыл бұрын
One of the best tanks ever made.It sure did it's job very well in it's time
@Neonblue843 жыл бұрын
The T-55AM, old memories '79-'81er duty in NVA (National peoples army, east germany). Simple, robust, but as main battle tank (later with T-72 and Vers. A Export) out of date, but it works!
@karlp84847 жыл бұрын
"The Beast of War" is an excellent movie, I'm glad you gave it a plug. All the outside shots were of a T-55, but the internal shots are far too roomy to be that. Big deal. I can't believe how reliable and durable these tanks are, they "maintained" often under appalling conditions in the toughest environments imaginable and they just last and last. The amount of oil smoke they belch out would indicate that the engine's fcked but that's not the case because they seem to keep going...
@theemperor24917 жыл бұрын
would you ever do a video on the t 34
@my_boi557 жыл бұрын
the Emperor his not into WW2 only to modern tanks. his knowledge on WW2 tanks is not really good
@amaethon21177 жыл бұрын
WarBoy Playz The T54-55 isn't modern. Just saying.
@my_boi557 жыл бұрын
Amaethon Jones wait really?(in a friendly way) it was made in 1970 that's like post WW2 and watch his live stream u will know of why matsimus will not cover WW2 tanks ;)
@amaethon21177 жыл бұрын
WarBoy Playz Late 40s, ;)
@dipacalypse10927 жыл бұрын
"civil war"??
@thefz1rider7 жыл бұрын
Being quite a bit older than you (59), these were the Soviet tanks I feared as a kid. These tanks were th boogie men tanks that were going to come flooding out of the Soviet Union into Europe starting WWIII. Thankfully, that never happened. I love seeing info and movies on these older tanks to learn more about them. I would be interested in comparison videos of tanks on opposing sides at the various times. Be them German vs English. German Vs American. Soviet vs American. Soviet vs English. Soviet vs German. How they stacked up to each other. Including crew comfort/surviability etc. Thanks for the great video.
@fail_bunnyqq34927 жыл бұрын
The Beast of War (1988) "Out of commission, become a pillbox. Out of ammo, become a bunker. Out of time, become heroes."
@ModenaAU6 жыл бұрын
Footage around 11:15 has been mirrored, driver is on the wrong side, and so is the exhaust.
@JohnDoe-qo4xd7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for a a EX clip as usual. One thing I react on here is how incredible fast new going (mostly) found it's way to the frontline version. I guess the Ww2 Germans excelled at this because of lack of heavy materials and great ingenuity.
@michaelhoward76356 жыл бұрын
the 55's armor was actually just heavy for western standards...when it was built.
@frank-michaeljaeschke47986 жыл бұрын
T54 too. At least one T54 in Hungary Revolution 1956 was driven to the british embassy. This leads to the development of the Royal Ordnance L7 after the T 54 was inspected.
@xuda71007 жыл бұрын
can you do a video on the MBT-70 which is an American Prototype tank that was originally designed to replace the M60 Patton series?
@ricktaylor47894 жыл бұрын
Great video! The T-55 is my favorite tank.
@koala20756 жыл бұрын
I always stumble along your channel...hm is it the amazing content?....the great commentary?....or me just randomly searching things and having them conincdently be made by you? probably 3 but those 2 are true and good.
@nosuchthingasshould41757 жыл бұрын
I love how 'Evolutionary' the soviet tanks look, from before the war to T90, you can track the small changes in appearance building up.
@Bowhunter-ky3ez5 жыл бұрын
We had 3 of these tanks in 1978 at the Armor Engineer board at Fort Knox , we pitted them against the M-1 during the testing of the both the G.M and Chrysler versions.
@cczevak53137 жыл бұрын
They also had problems with engine fumes finding their way inside the poorly ventilated interior. Lots of people passed out or died from the fumes. That was improved upon in the upgrades though.
@shidder_mutt7 жыл бұрын
Such a amazing tank for its time.
@ardaonen49687 жыл бұрын
rowsdower yeah it really made the 17/20pdr armed brits shit their pants
@shidder_mutt7 жыл бұрын
Arda Onen and the L7 made the slavs shit their pants.
@amaethon21177 жыл бұрын
Arda Onen The 20 pounder could still rip through a T55. Besides the 105 L7 completely negated any armour advantage
@tommeakin17327 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure the 20 pounder firing Sabot would be able to deal with their armour. We're talking 280mm of penetration there I believe. But of course no HESH, like the L7, which really loves those russian tanks with sloped armour and no spall-liners
@rogerc65335 жыл бұрын
Far superior the the heavier, lighter protected, underpowered and massive target that was the rival M47 patton!
@dimitri_tsm4 жыл бұрын
13:35 The tank can also utilize teleportation, making it even more formidable.
@garynew9637 Жыл бұрын
Haha, essential skills
@xmeda7 жыл бұрын
You don't need anything better if you are mostly dealing with pick-ups, obsolete APCs or infantry equipped with light weapons. Ability to shoot HE-FRAGs, protection from light weapons fire and some FEAR factor is all you need.. many countries still operate these tanks as standard army equipment using them basically as mobile artillery supporting infantry and light vehicles. Btw. that 100mm cannon still can disable any modern tank..
@bigturn10516 жыл бұрын
The cannon really can only disable modern tanks from the side and back
@kcimb5 жыл бұрын
That 100mm gun is impotent against modern tanks. T55s are largely worthless against trucks, especially Toyota’s. Chad repelled the Libyan army in the 80s.
@laurikivinen57095 жыл бұрын
You mentioned that Finland operates t55m models. Yes indeed but those are our own domestically upgraded from the normal t55. They include new projectiles from west, fcs from bofors and so on but the kit doens't include any armor upgrades.
@Limescale127 жыл бұрын
I immediately thought of The Beast when this video popped up. Great movie. And great video 👍
@1965Leonard4 жыл бұрын
11:04 Armour thin by western standard. That is wrong sir. Compare with M48 and Centurion of its day T-55 have thicker armor by several cm on all sides.
@calvinpearson46197 жыл бұрын
Great video! Could you do a video on the Chieftain or Challenger 1? Would be really keen to hear your thoughts on these tanks!
@christiannewaye73065 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to still use the T-55 in a light and role or a second line of defense !
@kcimb5 жыл бұрын
Christian Newaye not if you want to survive the engagement..the t55 is hopelessly outdated.
@zxbzxbzxb14 жыл бұрын
Depends who, and what, you're fighting I suppose
@boffinboy1007 жыл бұрын
Matsimus, How did you miss the modern (today) upgrades/versions of the T-55 or the more radical versions that took the T-55 to T-80U levels? Not expecting you to cover everyone, but I am surprised at no mention of its chassis use for the ZSU-57-2 and Marksman SPAAG, fitting of the Drozd APS, the conversions into BTR-T and Israeli HIFVs, how (i read one source) a BMPT conversion is available to T-55 operators, the TR-85 as the MBT of Romania and the T-55AGM with a 125mm gun, new turret and FCS etc.
@sirfijoe450 Жыл бұрын
It is a very aesthetically pleasing tank in my opinion. Smooth rounded edges with a low but wide profile.
@Gerbs19135 жыл бұрын
Even today a tank like this is better than not having a tank at all; however, as every armored force has learned a tank is a big target unless you use proper combined force tactics and strategy. Air, armor, artillery, and infantry have to work together to make each individual component succeed. Having a large formation of any tank even modern tanks just makes you a target for enemy aircraft, artillery, and anti tank infantry unless you have a proper counter for each.
@lanceluthor66604 жыл бұрын
If your dealing with an insurgency and your biggest threats are RPG7 ,PKMs and IEDs just one of these would be incredibly useful,great for morale and well within the capability of a third world army to maintain.
@Axemantitan6 жыл бұрын
5:57 What is the log for?
@solidsnake2957 жыл бұрын
in my contry the t54/55 are the main battle tank and we use them very well. we kicked modern tank ass with these tanks they are very good
@daveybernard10565 жыл бұрын
Well, tell us what country!
@herrakaarme5 жыл бұрын
@@daveybernard1056 He's probably talking about his country in his favourite game.
@wizzzer13377 жыл бұрын
the T-54/55 is the AK-47 of tanks
@zacharydrumm26147 жыл бұрын
I would love to see you do a review on the T-55 AGM or the T-72 120.
@birthdwt88597 жыл бұрын
review the centurions
@ivanmonahhov23145 жыл бұрын
You forgot T-55-AD which was the version with Drozd-1 APS.
@sirbader17 жыл бұрын
+2:00 anti aircraft mount? X3 Dushkas?
@HasinduHerath3 жыл бұрын
This is a beast with beauty...sri lankas back bone of armoured corps❤️❤️❤️
@TheBadacz7 жыл бұрын
I was commander of platoon of those T-55 tanks. It was fun serving with them.
@smooth_sundaes51727 жыл бұрын
I wonder if it's the most destroyed in combat tank also. Don't have the stats but this thing was in A LOT of wars
@zxbzxbzxb14 жыл бұрын
I think the T-34 must beat it, because of the numbers actually deployed in WW2 (and often quite badly deployed too, especially early on) and the intensity and scale of fighting on the eastern front in WW2
@milligramsmile4427 жыл бұрын
thank you! I was looking for the title of the movie for years now.
@viorelviorel23247 жыл бұрын
its a captured tank the one in the movie with an israeli gun on it but yeah the beast of war is a really amazing movie there is something pleasing to the eye to see tanks in the desert dirty a little bit damaged here and there not new like a parade
@michaeldenesyk3195 Жыл бұрын
Hey Matt, I agree. The Beast is a great movie. Some facts about what was used and where it was filmed. The tank used was an Israeli version of the T-55, called the T-67. So many were captured that Israel modified them to have the 105mm L7 and they were used in the Yom Kippur War, you can actually see a 105 mm HEAT round being loaded in one scene. Also,. the film was made in Israel
@ultranomad93517 жыл бұрын
the t55 is still in service today! it's amazing for any type of battle and setting. It's the Ak-47 for tanks.
@pikminlord3437 жыл бұрын
another great video
@LivingMyBestLife9563 жыл бұрын
"The Valley of Tears" .......Centurions turned thousands the T-55 into 4 person crematoriums.
@NorthernNorthdude917493 жыл бұрын
Centurion is shit T-14 Armata beat it
@roranger62083 жыл бұрын
@@NorthernNorthdude91749 I wonder why, not as if centurion was made about 70 years before T14
@reddevilparatrooper7 жыл бұрын
I went inside of an old T-54/55 tank at Ft.Irwin California back in 1999 at their armor museum. The tank is very basic. I went inside the gunner's station and the sights were like using an SVD Dragunov rifle scope or an RPG-7 sight. It had a height basic range finder on the left and aiming points with a vertical center line and stadia lines for off set aiming for when a target is moving left or right. It was like using the GAS (Gunner's Auxiliary Sight) on the M1A1 when all power to the GPS (Gunner's Primary Sight) is down. The tank is basically upgraded WWII or 1950s technology. The T-54/55 tank would have been used well in static defense not on a fire on the move for combat because of it's sights. I am sure there are different models out there that were upgraded with better stabilization and fire control similar to the 1980s version of the M-60A1 with thermal imaging systems. Honestly the tank is very small and my Leprechaun ass size at 5,6 feet and 160 pounds is too big to fit in the gunner's station and driver's hole. The loader had to be even smaller and stronger to load the 100mm round,the TC had slightly more room than all the crew because he had to command the tank and operate the radios and sights.
@alexanderbezumov35314 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video about tank sights, there is not much information about this on the inbternet that i can find at least
@yeahlol29117 жыл бұрын
I have some question here:- -did tank speed matter? -did faster tank have an advantages? -what is the optimum speed for a tank?
@SigurdKristvik7 жыл бұрын
yay T-54 and the T-55
@left4halo45 жыл бұрын
Name of song at 9:50?
@epicninjasky11124 жыл бұрын
the fact they made 100k of these is jawdropping impressive
@misouhrovic7 жыл бұрын
14:20 u mentioned the film "The Beast of War" (1988) super film thx for heads up. there s also a tv serie "The Beast" (2009) w Pat Swayze...completly different but good enough t watch too...thx ...and keep up.
@isaiahstrong72247 жыл бұрын
Where did you get all the Soviet black and white footage in the beginning?
@Altegore5 жыл бұрын
In Squad, we drove a T-62 recently against the British - we poped 2 Warriors and a lot of infantry, but couldn't take down the Challenger... :D The Challenger crew was prone to panic, trough, so we forced it to retreat 2 times after taking 1-2 hits from us - he was fine, just sort of smoking and scared and couldn't see us...
@topnotch35617 жыл бұрын
great work stick at the great work
@freshfrozen30354 жыл бұрын
It’s the most iconic tank in the world From the early 50s to the 90s and it’s still good
@ALegitimateYoutuber7 жыл бұрын
Hey could you do a video on some of the armaments used by armored vehicles. Like the semi-combustible shells that you can find used by various tanks. Would be really neat to hear more about such things.
@theopinion94526 жыл бұрын
I drove a T-55 in the Cuban army back 1990-91,it was an upgraded version with extra armor on the turret and front of driver.
@omeltoyman75666 жыл бұрын
Do you have a t62a review?
@brendanbrlit44677 жыл бұрын
My grandfather commanded one of these for his national service for the Czechoslovakian army, I love this tank.
@gideonhorwitz94345 жыл бұрын
There’s something about it’s design that makes is seem so timeless
@burgernouilles33285 жыл бұрын
Hey matsimus that was a good video i’d like one with MRAPs where u compare it to others countries MRAPs thank u
@ninjagonesmith44956 жыл бұрын
Love your video
@The_Furless7 жыл бұрын
do tanks have a gun sight for close range combat like in urban areas?
@systemhalodark5 жыл бұрын
If all you need to deal with are technicals and you are on a budget, a T55 is sufficient.
@kcimb5 жыл бұрын
Systemhalodark Libya tired that in the 80s, didn’t work
@MaxCroat7 жыл бұрын
Do the Croatian M95 Degman, dont know if u can find much info on it as it didnt ever enter service but two prototypes were produced so u might find some information.