Metaphysics vs Evolution

[@Waqas-Umer]

I commend ur resolve. Not for the knowledge being shared or for the efforts you take to make the videos. But for the fact that large majority in the comments fail to engage in any meaningful way, remaining in denial and within their false bubbles yet you persevere. Keep going, I am not a traditional student of Science but very fascinated by it and find your videos really helpful for a noob like me!

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@Waqas-Umer thank you. 🙏 I feel that myself so many times.

[@GR_Mplo]

Khali bataen na Karen. Sir ko chahiye ke kissi ache wale alum E Deen se peacefully online debate Karen. Tab hi hum koii sahi Faisal kar sake gen.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@ matlab you can’t make up your mind by examining the evidence? Hmmmm

[@GR_Mplo]

@Taimur_Laal evidence koi chupi hui Cheez Nahin. Evolution ke khilaf bhi to evidence Hain. Agar AAP smjhte Hain ke AAP ke evidence ziyada qavi Hain to khul ke debate Karen Jo completely peaceful ho ta ke hum bhi Jan saken ke dalail Kis ke pass ziyada qavi Hain. Magar maqsad sirf sahi ilm hasil Karna ho.

[@MrMuhammadsabir1]

Sir , You explained this difficult , mysterious and complex philosophical paradigm in a very simplistic way , Thanks & stay blessed

[@Knvdialogue]

Knowledge , thoughts and changes occured in 3700 yearz summarised in 37 Minutes. This is amazingly brilliant This and such other videos based factual Knowledge be shared with all schools, colleges and universities as they still live in stone age Keep smiling and shining 🎉🎉❤

[@bittertruth201]

Bohat hi umda video jitni bhi tareef ki jae kum ha

[@Taimur_Laal]

Please share as much as possible.

[@bittertruth201]

@@Taimur_Laal yes sir i am keep sharing your informative videos and i will for sure

[@19665061]

Nature is not just material or materialistic, it's beyond our understanding. Philosophy of the metaphysical realm is secondary job. Primary task is Asim Munir. 🤗

[@MoulviWithAnAttitude-b5u]

VIRTUAL vigo is coming for you😆

[@msaqii7301]

LoL

[@sapien307]

Black vigo is comming 🤣😂😂👌

[@19665061]

​@@sapien307Digital arrest 😄

[@19665061]

👍​@@sapien307

[@manmohanmehta5697]

Very nice lecture. Acceptance of truth with proof is the way forward.

[@chiraghbaloch9164]

I usually watch your lectures sir but this one touched my heart. A very well-researched, mind blowing, and comprehensive lecture on the topic - indeed all your videos are. Keep guiding us, sir! Stay blessed!

[@NaseerAhmadkhan-y1g]

👍we studied in Fsc concept of alternation of generation in biology conversion of sporophyte generation to gametophyte and vice versa

[@shujaqureshi5370]

Scholars like you are laying the foundation of Renaissance in the Muslim world. Thank You!

[@ajaypatra2863]

Excellent ! A great pleasure to listen to the video. Contains the summary of the history of intellectual activities of mankind.

[@Nangyalay]

I am fascinated by your conviction to educate people like us. This channel is the only relevant channel I have ever seen. I have learned a lot from you. You always provide irrefutable evidence. I must appreciate your hard work. Keep enlightening us.

[@alirazasyed2763]

As always thanks sir🎉🎉

[@ShayanAli-l1x7b]

Explained in super simple words 🎉

[@vision78678]

ارتقاء ہر گز مذہب یا فطرت کے خلاف نہیں۔۔۔۔بلکہ عین فطرت ہے ۔۔۔۔فطرت دو طریقوں سے کام کرتی ہے ایک ننانوے فیصد ریڈی میڈ نیچرل لاز کے تحت جو اللہ عزوجل نے پروگرام پہلےہی کر دیے۔۔۔دوسرا کبھی کبھار براہ راست ذات پاک کی توجہ خاص کے تحت۔۔۔۔

[@populartalkshak]

It is always an honour to listen to you.

[@RashidAli800]

Thanks Sir, inlighting us and lecture provide us fruit for thought

[@ayeshanoor6946]

Such an informative video! We need more critical minds like you.

[@malkiatsingh5143]

ਵਿਦਵਾਨ ਰੱਬ, ਅੱਲ੍ਹਾ, ਗੌਡ, ਈਸ਼ਵਰ ਆਦਿ ਐਵੇਂ ਘਸੋੜੀ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ, ਪਲੈਟੋ ਦੀ ਸੋਚ ਦੇ ਸਹਾਰੇ ਅਸੀ ਵਿਗਿਆਨ ਤੋਂ ਮੂੰਹ ਮੋੜ ਰਹੇ ਹਾਂ। ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਚਾਰਲਸ ਡਾਰਵਿਨ ਨੂੰ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਲੈਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ।

[@arifsaleem5467]

Google translator translates your last sentence as, "he should read Charles Darwin", is that what you mean?

[@sajidfarooq2537]

#Sir Taimur Lal Sahab u brilliant 😊

[@khizirali]

Please one lecture on Iqbal's philosophy 🙏

[@saleemsada786]

Lot of thanks for valuable content to Change our old mentality

[@ashrafalam6075]

Respected Professor, I am admirer of your lectures. Only for information, Books of Dr Bashir Uddin Mehmood and Istanbul School of English on KZbin are worth reading and watching. Both are crystal clear explanations of Islam. Thanks for Educating.

[@Theriverflows]

Bashiruddin hahaha? Woh jinnon se bijli bananay wala???

[@ajaypatra2863]

We see caterpillars turning into butterflies. A surface moving insect turns into a flying insect.

[@arshadkayani5972]

Excellent talk

[@msaqii7301]

Means Tabdeli agyei nahi Tabdili shuru sa chall rehi ha..😮

[@okvideos5228]

love you for this evolution series ❤❤❤❤

[@IMKhan-ze4zm]

Great knowledgeable video, keep it up and enlightened us❤

[@MrKamranhaider0]

The Quran touches upon the concept of the universe and its expansion in several verses. One of the most frequently cited verses in this context is from Surah Adh-Dhariyat (51:47), which states

[@syedfasih74]

Good lecture 👍

[@imtiazahmad6694]

نہایت عمدہ کام کر رہے ہیں آپ ❤

[@SamarJohn456]

Kab tak logo ke modon pe ralh ke bandook chalao gy me Lord…. Just accept and be brave …… You have all options to move out of hell and enlighten so many more with more clarity.. still love you what you do

[@abdullahelannoor5173]

بہت مزا آیا بہت بہت شکریہ آپ سے التجا ہے کہ کن کن سائنسدانوں کا قتل ہوا تھا اس پر بھی ایک ویڈیو ضرور بنائیں جیسا کی اپنے ذکر کیا Thank you once again ❤

[@yeezythabest]

Is there an English version of this lecture? Greetings from Senegal 🇸🇳

[@prof.syedimtiazali6689]

Have you gone through Mulla Sadra's philisophy of Intrinsic Mobility حرکت جوھری? I feel your talk has to be comprehensive by mentioning this. I like your talks. Best of luck.

[@GR_Mplo]

Mulla sadra AAP Ki soch se bhi aage hain

[@AsifKhan-bv3iu]

With ease and fluency you have explained dialectics of nature. Of course nature is changeable and human nature can also be changeable. By the change of mode of the production human nature can be changed. Cultural Marxist particularly the Frankfurt school of thought deliberately misinterpreted the Marxism and devirt the attention of the Marxism towards culture Marxism and laid down the foundation of anti- Marxism. Your lecture opens the vistas about true Marxism. The crux of the argument is without atheist worldview someone cannot seem to grasp and discern the true spirit of Marxism.

[@harrishameed3687]

Keep fighting the ignorance,we are with you.✊🏼

[@adventurouskashmir7341]

I have request. Could you please make a lecture on posthumanism and its idea of human and also the renewed understanding of human and nature

[@ramchandradey4059]

Thanks but i do request to kindly study deeply the philosophy of Sri Aurobindo , his innovative ideas on evolution of divine life ,mind overmind and supermind etc to feel the pulse and spirit of Indian Upanishadas overmind

[@19665061]

Does our thinking and way of thinking affects/dusturbs inanimate lifeless matter?

[@19665061]

Dr.Taimur, why not you kindly join 'ResearchGate' and 'Academia' social networking sites for intellectual connectedness?

[@arifkhan-sy1it]

Sir apsay parhnay walay philosophy k students lucky hon gain. Govt schools ko sehi krnay main kuch karain

[@magrayfayaz1478]

Beautiful

[@mohammedashfaq835]

Some say that the fossil record lacks "transitional forms", or the in-between stages of one type of creature evolving into another. people argue that it is not a fact or is a theory in crisis

[@Rational-d6u]

Sir one lecture on " is philosophy relevant in present times and in future " or "The role of philosophy in present times and future "...

[@19665061]

I think the terms "spiritual", "spiritualism", "spirituality" of Henry George would better fit and explain the point you wish to make instead of "divinity" or "divine".

[@HarisA1i]

Sir agr har cheese change or evolute krti ha to qaisar Raja ki evolution kio ni hoti?

[@heartfeltteaching]

Har 🧀 change aur evolute nahin karti 😂

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@HarisA1i some things take longer to change :)

[@Dangerboy-45357]

@@Taimur_Laal Waah sir kia baat kee hai app nai♥️♥️♥️♥️😍😍

[@krishnakantvijay824]

Ultimate reality.

[@vision78678]

ایک مثال سمجھیں کہ ایک اعلی افسر اپنے نایب کو دفتر بٹھا کر جاتا ہے کہ فلاں کام ایسے فلاں کام ایسے کرنا ہے ۔۔۔۔وہ نایب اس کام کو ننانوے فیصد ویسے ہی کرنے پر پابند ہے ۔۔لیکن کچھ مسایل ایسے ہیں جن میں وہ سمجھ نہیں سکتا۔۔۔۔تو دوبارہ اعلی افسر سے رابطہ سے معاملہ ہدایات کے مطابق حل کرتا ہے

[@shahsaadat7577]

"In the realm of nature, where science holds sway, A new world unfolds, like a lotus in May. China's prowess in technology, a marvel to behold, A testament to human ingenuity, young and old. The philosopher's heart, aflame with curiosity's fire, Yearns to grasp the secrets of the universe's grand design. In the crucible of science, old notions are refined, As the cosmos yields its mysteries, one by one, in time.

[@drirbazawan1247]

No Qaiser Raja is harmed in this video 😂

[@19665061]

He, this man Raja is hacking my comments on LVT on a separate video on the economic system of taxation in Islam.

[@deebaparveen6010]

Sura Rehman 55:49 Is asking us this theory

[@arifsaleem5467]

What does it say?

[@deebaparveen6010]

@ you can see in Quran please

[@arifsaleem5467]

@@deebaparveen6010 I can't go around chasing, cross checking, examining and evaluating every reference and hint people drop or mention in their comments, it's on you to provide a brief description of your claim along with details of the reference, so one can decide if it's worth the hassle to investigate any further. So, please state what it says or I would have to assume that you yourself don't know anything about it.

[@genz-off]

Sir you have to relax some second in your sentence it will be more interested and easy to lesson.

[@19665061]

Question : What is energy (define)? Answer: Energy is of several types! ... That's an example of escapism & incompetence! 😊

[@arifsaleem5467]

As if you know what energy is. 😂

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467No one knows but everyone uses this term.

[@MubashirHussainKhan]

I think Quran puts light on Evolition theory ...sura noor: 24:45.... And Allah has created from water every living creature. Some of them crawl on their bellies, some walk on two legs, and some walk on four. Allah creates whatever He wills. Surely Allah is Most Capable of everything. اور immutability پر بھی اللہ فرماتا ہے کہ وہ ہر روز ایک نئی شان سے جلوہ گر ہوتا ہے۔۔۔

[@TheRationalLeft]

Absolute agree

[@19665061]

Nature/Cosmos is naturally way beyond material (solid, gas, liquid, plasma). Not to say angles, sky and underwater realm points towards light orbs, ETs, aliens comrades.

[@aliqasim9157]

Wow

[@alirazasyed2763]

Even the Concept of God is in evolution. Today i think Hardly an individual believe that God order him to sacrifice his beloved son for.HIS happiness

[@umarmalik6590]

What happened if pluto and these philosophers are right and science proof this?

[@myslant]

1. Wese main ap ki kisi point se agree nai but ager man ly sub change ho raha he to ye changle ki ability universe main kese ai? 2. kia camra ki ijad k bad Species change hona band ho gai ? (ab ye ne kehna k is main time lagta ager lagta he to kitna lagta he is ka mtlb her time change he to ab bhi ho raha ho ga change ager ye bat bhi man ly to is se y ho ga k koi Species prfect ni hoi chay mtlb koi monky half monky hona chahy or half human ya half se ziyda ya kam bhi ho skta q k wo aik change k process main he na k just monkey balky sb Species hi adhi adhuri to honi change ho q k ager time lagta he to fish se start krty he wo abhi fish he kuch to tume guzra ho ga us ka or kitna time lagy ga ye kon decide kry ga) 3. wese koi exempl to ap ko bhi deni chay with evidence k kon Species abhi abhi change ho rhi kisi dosri Species main. 4. Ager koi keh dy kabhi kuch bhi change ho skta he or wo God ki trf se ho skta but bhi ap physics law main change ni mano gy kaho gy jese law usi trah hi ga but kis physics k law create kiy? 5. ager her cheez k pichy cuse he to nature kis ne create ki or ager khud hoi to kia cause he? 1st step se batana. 6. ye kese man ly k science abhi sb sahi bata rhi he or wo bina evidence like Big Bang where is the evidence no body can prove this. 7. science k pass boht c baton k jawbat ni kab se science ho rhi ger hoty to abi tk ap unhi pornai debate main na phase hoty like start kese hova? 8.aik bachon wali kahani suna di jati je k africa k log black q un hight ziyda q and chineds ya west main log white q ya hight kam k african k hisab se to ye dekho evolution sabit ho but bhai jan kia wo africa k log insan se kuch or bna gay hain ya chainge kuch bn gay hain insan hi hian or ager ye kaha jay hum is ly kisi Specie ko kisi dosri Specie main change hoty nai dikha skty q k time lagta he but ye color change hight change to 2nd 3rd main bhi show ho jata he ager koi african kisi chines se shadi kry to next gen hi change ho jay gi. 9. kaha jata he k human k DNA monky se 90% ya is ziyda match hoty hain to phir to sy sb Species aik hi Specie se hain to sb k match hony chay? !0. 1st cell kese bana? Abhi boht kuch he likhny ko but man thak gaya bhchon wali kahinya chory dy Lalal Sb

[@Theriverflows]

Oh bhai koi kitab parh le. Apni taraf se Philosoper banay hwy ho. These are basic questions. Read a book before trying to appear smart

[@myslant]

@@Theriverflows basic question ka answer to ker do 1st cell kese kider se aya or prove bhi kerna he.

[@myslant]

Ager in basice questions k answer hoty to bhai ye debate hi khatam ho jati wo question wese k wese hi hain koi prove bhi day diya kro jub kisi book main kisi kuch likh deny se answer nai samj lety

[@Theriverflows]

@ again. Read a goddamn book instead of arguing in comments here. Not wasting my time on your childish idiocy

[@hussaindarvlogs8518]

​@@myslantyar ap ko ja kar evolution ke bare mein proper biologists ke lecture sunane chahiye kiun ke bhai ap ke first almost sare questions ke answer diye ja chuke hein

[@shamsindhi6827]

Lal salam❤❤❤❤

[@kassimtufail9061]

Very well done amazing impressive information great job 👏🏼

[@azadprinda3186]

Aggar science main taraqi krni hai to uskalia mazhab side py rakh k . rational mind sa sochna zruri ha. Mazhab ki ainak lga k ham science ko kabhi nhe samjh sakty

[@19665061]

Metaphysics obviously takes us beyond physical world. What's beyond that transcends us? Did Marx explore this world? No! Why? His belief in making this PHYSICAL universe better for humans was unparalleled.

[@arifsaleem5467]

What is metaphysics?

[@19665061]

Is this the way to do science and philosophise? A specimen: What's the "origin" of universe? What existed before "Big Bang"?

[@heartfeltteaching]

There is no before the Big Bang because the Big Bang itself is t=0

[@arifsaleem5467]

The concept of existence is limited by time and space.

[@19665061]

Time and space are constructs of mind. ​@@arifsaleem5467

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467These are constructs of mind

[@Dangerboy-45357]

Mughey lagta hai kai ye lecture sunney key baad qaisar raja ki aqal thikaney aa gai hoon gee 😂😂😂

[@MehmoodQureshi-u8o]

🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@razashahpehlvi6589]

❤

[@krishnakantvijay824]

Many many live species are disappeared. How divine force work.

[@rekibhumanity9703]

👍

[@AbdulRasheed-zj3bj]

No not at all, physical description never negates metaphysicality Sir you have described physical enitieies and laws rather metaphysical Decort physical and metaphysical principles are much different sir You ate not new one just confusing commeners sir 😊

[@arifsaleem5467]

BTW, what is metaphysics?

[@owaiskhanday99]

Debate Qaiser Ahmad Raja

[@heartfeltteaching]

Why should Taimur waste his time with that fool 😂

[@owaiskhanday99]

@heartfeltteaching what's foolish in doing a debate. Come man up!

[@arifsaleem5467]

Cancer Raja the famous biologist, AKA. famous bullshitiologist.

[@19665061]

Physicists do more of mathematics than philosophy!That too when they're religious (spiritualists). This is paradoxical and problematic that needs proper diagnosis, understanding and solution. Mathematics follows a set childish logic. Philospphy follows dialectic-logic, if at all philosophy is truly interested in pursuing truth.

[@arifsaleem5467]

What truth, the one you yourself concocted, brainwashed into, or chose to believe without evidence? And what method do you suggest to find and verify that so-called personal unverified and unverifiable truth? Please enlighten us all.

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467Asim Munir is the present truth. Zia was truth in the past...

[@shamshadkazmi9778]

Chasma laga ke aaya na professor wala look 🤓

[@sagheerahmed9839]

Still raja sab believe in immutable

[@sastriji9547]

Enternal hone ka matlab ye nhi ki kisi ne bnaya Hain 😂😂😂😂😂

[@ghulambrohi8637]

پہلے حصے میں لگا کہ مجھے ویڈیو نہیں دیکھنی چاہیے اور آخری حصے میں اتمنان ہوا آپ نہیں بدلے ہمیں بدلنا چاہتے ہیں بس ذرا سا مذہبی ٹچ کے ساتھ

[@alliswell3711]

Lal Salam

[@hammadhussain4422]

I have listened the whole lecture and can't understand what was the purpose of this effort. So the philosophers in the past made an error on a " minor detail" like you said regarding neo darwinism in response to denise nobel interview recently. " So what , minor errors doesn't refute anything". are you trying to make a case that the science couldn't have grown so far unless platonic teachings were debunked ? So what , human being were still engaging in science to an extent like ever . It was not the case where human race could have wiped out because of platonic teachings / philosophy. Materialistic approach or materialization of science has also draw backs hindering the growth of science . Please watch dr. Rupert Sheldrake's work regarding how science is broken. Furthermore, it seems you imply that human race as some kind of obligation to grow science particularly science of this era . How did you get there ? Can't we sacrifice the modern science for greater good ? You can change everything as long as it doesn't hurt THE PURPOSE OF EXISTENCE OF MANKIND i.e submission to the God .

[@19665061]

Is the universe aware that Homo Sapiens invented Capitalism? 😀

[@arifsaleem5467]

We are not separate from the universe, we are a part of it, so if we know something, a part of the universe also knows.

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467A part, not whole?

[@arifsaleem5467]

@@19665061 Yes a part, only a specific part, like a dead buffalo or Andromeda can't know what you know, even if you knew it all and vise versa.

[@MubashirHussainKhan]

Metaphysics concept also exists as Islamic terminology...LOH E MEHFOOZ...

[@hariprasaddhakad9074]

❤❤❤🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Lobe to see such a intellectual like TAIMUR LAL in Pakistan..... I could not imagine that people like you does exist in such a religious extremist country.

[@arifsaleem5467]

Then you need to learn to learn more before making up your mind about something.

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

Sir, totally disagree with you your all lecture because divine guidance can not be get from books it can only gain from heart to heart .

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 that is also written in books. For example that is one of the main ideas of Rumi.

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

@Taimur_Laal no. Sir that is just expressed but no one can get it in this language of words. Divine guidance is beyond words and language barrier

[@arifsaleem5467]

​​@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 Either you got it from a book or from a person who read it in a book, at the end it's still a book written by someone who coined this concept, unless you coined it yourself.

[@umerkhyam686]

Dear heart is just a pumping organ and nothing else,this biological interpretation of your divine scriptures is wrong,it was actually Aristotelian biological concept which is rejected by today modern biological understanding

[@19665061]

Philosophers and others including ourselves should not use the terms "nature", "universe" , "cosmos" etc. loosely and interchangeably. Then Allah-tala and God can't be explained. Nomenclature task leads us to confusion and violence.

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

Absolutely right. Actually spirituality can not be explained in words or this language there is no language for that , that only need heart listening to understand spiritual or divine knowledge or or divine guidance about actual world or what is purpose of life .

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

Divine guidance or metaphysical etc can not be get from books that's divine and that demand other form of prerequisites

[@arifsaleem5467]

​@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 What other form of prerequisites?

[@19665061]

If teleology (final cause, fixed purpose) is given, i e. Nature/Cosmos/Universe just EXISTS 'per se' then... --hello Big Bang Theorists, kindly pay attention to Aristotle!

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@19665061 that’s the point. It is not given.

[@19665061]

​@@Taimur_LaalRight, if universe has no teleology, then does it have ontology --principle of being/ coming into being like ontology of say labor? Second, aren't physicists on the wrong path in so far as they strive after the "ORIGIN" of the universe? On lighter note, just because they're being paid salaries and perks and allowances so they're at leisure to invent any problem falling and rising in the realm of vague amorphous "origin"?

[@Taimur_Laal]

@ universe does not have an ontology. We have an ontology about the universe.

[@19665061]

​@@Taimur_LaalWe have many things which are irrational. Like Big Bang, origin of universe, pre-Big Bang v. Post-Big Bang, and so on

[@notadane]

Please keep doing what you're doing, Prof. But organically. Please don't get into a dialectic with the not-so-grand inquisitors of Pakistan, who are trying to make common cause to try to bait you into debate. Sincerely, Random online admirer.

[@anwaranwar-o9k]

zayada tar muslim aj ke dor me heliocentric ko hi mante he q ke iska aqeede se koi lena dena nahi he..

[@noorahmed2862]

Qaisar raja seems to have made you mad so instead of focusing on economics which is your subject you are confused and making your followers focused on such topics. Anyway, after AI what is left to you professors to tell the students.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@noorahmed2862 AI is an echo chamber. You can get whatever answer you require from it. Professors are needed to advance knowledge.

[@arifsaleem5467]

Cancer the famous bullshitiologist?

[@murtazakhanshah3740]

In this 37:17 video not a single word is confusing but to understand it needs some I Q level which is beyond the capacity of followers of Qaiser Raja who is living in medieval era

[@Rational-555]

Science always push religions to evolve..... so they interpret religious books differently. 😂

[@USMANUMER-l6f]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/bGOlcnV5nK-GhZosi=Gt8vkkxSe12BEuhY Sir Thank You Very Much❤

[@sahilahmed8571]

Can you define divine force by science? All are sugar coated lies

[@Lakhvi-b8z]

Kiya aap is baat par yakeen karte hai ki allah ne 6 din me zameen asman ko bnaya 😢

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@Lakhvi-b8z I think even maulvis do not take it literally anymore.

[@Lakhvi-b8z]

​@@Taimur_Laal Sahi bola sir apne ❤,,, mene zafer heretic Chanel par iski video dekhi thi uske bad me bhi sochne par majbur ho daya

[@Asthetic_xp]

Qaiser Ahmed raja ka samna bath aak minute tik ja oska samna 😂

[@muneebrehman95]

Yahan ap ny aik bohot achi mistake ki hy. Religious people evolution ky against nahi hain. Evolution natural process hy. Religious figures natural selection as a matter of randomness and 1 universal ancestor ky against hain. Aik ideology ky aik part ko reject karny sy zaroori nahi puri ideology hi reject ho jai.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@muneebrehman95 mistake nahin hai. It is only after 150 years of scientific advance on evolution that they are now ready to concede just a little space to evolution.

[@muneebrehman95]

@Taimur_Laal so they accept it right. Do evolution (excluding the randomness aspect), go against Islamic base believes established in Quran and Hadith ( part of Islam which Muslims believe as absolute fact )?

[@muneebrehman95]

@Taimur_Laal i do agree that they did not accept at first. It was for the political reasons. Just for an example in south asia, some of the islamic schools rejected British and everything that British taught. According to book I read the history of Muslim education system in Hindustan by Molana Sayed Munazir Ahsan Gilani.

[@muneebrehman95]

@@Taimur_Laalthanks for your answer. Would love to learn more about things under which I can understand with reasoning (which can be right or wrong)

[@sadamhussainshaikh5392]

@@Taimur_Laalas if your scientific revolution has proved any of these two claims (Random mutation and Common Ancestory)!

[@Humanist-o3b]

Quaisar is incorrigible

[@sastriji9547]

Aristotle to Allah se bda huwa ...... Allah ne jameen chapti bnai hain .......or sakeen Hain ...... Aristotle was greatest then Allah 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@FawadAhmed-mn5ew]

آپ بندر سے انسان بن گئے ہیں اب انسان سے بھاگڑبلا کب بنیں گے

[@mdisrail7612]

In this more than half an hour long vlog of yours, you have repeatedly harped upon and advocated the darwinian concept of evolution and unjustly tried to malign the theological point of view regarding creation, evolution and development of life systems. Further you borrowed in bits and pieces from a host of biologists, chemists and physicists to prepare a complex and confusing recipe. You never presented any emperical datas and figures in support of your arguments and propositions. Your analysis is more of a rhetoric than being definitive or constructive and this goes on to portray you in poor and dull shades . If you want to refute theology and metaphysics then you should adopt a more analytical approach and come out with constructive and conclusive emperical evidence of your own. What science has to say we already know and it was a waste of time on your part to repeat and copy-paste all those theories, postulates, experiments and observations that are being carried out in the biological, physical, chemical, dialectical, geological, astronomical and philosophical domain.

[@Faqr-e-Ghayoor]

Professor of history talking on biological science. Even he doesn't have an understanding of own subject. How will he talk about this biological science. Ya wrong number hai.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@Faqr-e-Ghayoor this is school level biology and science. It comes under basic knowledge.

[@Faqr-e-Ghayoor]

@Taimur_Laal School-level knowledge provides only a basic foundation, which is essential but far from exhaustive. Even textbooks acknowledge that certain subjects, like the theory of evolution, are still evolving and not fully conclusive. While history students may consider such material a complete study, in the realm of science, it’s essential to view these concepts as part of an ongoing investigation rather than a finished narrative. Scientists continuously refine and expand upon these theories. Limitations of Darwinism: Lack of Genetic Basis: Darwin’s original theory lacked knowledge of heredity and genetics. He proposed "blending inheritance," which contradicted his ideas of variation and natural selection. Mechanism of Variation: Darwin could not explain how new variations arise or are preserved. Complexity of Traits: Evolutionary changes in complex traits and behaviors couldn't be entirely explained by gradualism. Fossil Record Gaps: Critics argue that the fossil record does not always show gradual transitions between species, as Darwin predicted. Cooperation vs. Competition: Darwin emphasized competition but underestimated the role of cooperation and mutualism in evolution. Limitations of Neo-Darwinism: Overemphasis on Mutation: Neo-Darwinism places heavy reliance on mutations as the primary source of variation, neglecting other mechanisms like epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer. Role of Environment: It underestimates the impact of environmental factors in shaping evolution through phenotypic plasticity. Gradualism Questioned: Evidence from punctuated equilibrium suggests that evolution may proceed in rapid bursts rather than slow, steady changes. Emerging Complexity: It struggles to explain the origin of complex molecular systems and pathways (e.g., the evolution of the eye). Epigenetics: Modern studies show that heritable changes can occur without alterations in DNA sequences, challenging traditional genetic views. Non-Adaptive Traits: Neo-Darwinism fails to address traits that do not appear to provide a survival advantage but persist nonetheless. So it is better to don't mislead students. Better to concentrate on your subject.

[@Theriverflows]

@@Faqr-e-Ghayoorevolution (and speciation ) has been proven beyond doubt. Molvis need to catch up. Grow up . The world has moved on / nobody takes you ID guys seriously anywhere.

[@Faqr-e-Ghayoor]

@Taimur_Laal School-level knowledge provides only a basic foundation, which is essential but far from exhaustive. Even textbooks acknowledge that certain subjects, like the theory of evolution, are still evolving and not fully conclusive. While history students may consider such material a complete study, in the realm of science, it’s essential to view these concepts as part of an ongoing investigation rather than a finished narrative. Scientists continuously refine and expand upon these theories. Darwin’s original theory lacked knowledge of heredity and genetics. He proposed "blending inheritance," which contradicted his ideas of variation and natural selection. Darwin could not explain how new variations arise or are preserved. Evolutionary changes in complex traits and behaviors couldn't be entirely explained by gradualism. Scientists argue that the fossil record does not always show gradual transitions between species, as Darwin predicted. Darwin emphasized competition but underestimated the role of cooperation and mutualism in evolution. Neo-Darwinism places heavy reliance on mutations as the primary source of variation, neglecting other mechanisms like epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer. It underestimates the impact of environmental factors in shaping evolution through phenotypic plasticity. Evidence from punctuated equilibrium suggests that evolution may proceed in rapid bursts rather than slow, steady changes. It struggles to explain the origin of complex molecular systems and pathways (e.g., the evolution of the eye). Modern studies show that heritable changes can occur without alterations in DNA sequences, challenging traditional genetic views. Neo-Darwinism fails to address traits that do not appear to provide a survival advantage but persist nonetheless. Don't delete this comment...

[@Faqr-e-Ghayoor]

Why does my response comment disappear?

[@ma9131]

How you being a lecturer on politics and especially on communism can talk on evolution?

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@ma9131 this lecture is actually more about philosophy. Sunno tu sahi.

[@Faqr-e-Ghayoor]

@@Taimur_Laal zabardasti