Metaphysics vs Evolution

In this lecture Dr. Taimur Rahman elaborates how Christianity and Islam took the notion of the immutability of nature from Ancient Greek thinkers and made it part of their medical religious worldview. This is also the reason why religious scholars continue to oppose evolution, not merely in biology, but in different aspects of understanding life. Dr. Rahman shows how the development of modern science since the Renaissance has demonstrated that nature is always in flux, always in change, and always in motion.

[@Waqas-Umer]

I commend ur resolve. Not for the knowledge being shared or for the efforts you take to make the videos. But for the fact that large majority in the comments fail to engage in any meaningful way, remaining in denial and within their false bubbles yet you persevere. Keep going, I am not a traditional student of Science but very fascinated by it and find your videos really helpful for a noob like me!

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@Waqas-Umer thank you. 🙏 I feel that myself so many times.

[@GR_Mplo]

Khali bataen na Karen. Sir ko chahiye ke kissi ache wale alum E Deen se peacefully online debate Karen. Tab hi hum koii sahi Faisal kar sake gen.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@ matlab you can’t make up your mind by examining the evidence? Hmmmm

[@GR_Mplo]

@Taimur_Laal evidence koi chupi hui Cheez Nahin. Evolution ke khilaf bhi to evidence Hain. Agar AAP smjhte Hain ke AAP ke evidence ziyada qavi Hain to khul ke debate Karen Jo completely peaceful ho ta ke hum bhi Jan saken ke dalail Kis ke pass ziyada qavi Hain. Magar maqsad sirf sahi ilm hasil Karna ho.

[@tufailmalik7795]

I am not sure what majority will make of these, but I think you have explained some of the complex ideas in simple way for students like me, with invitation to update our outdated world view. I hope we start studying science from scientific point of view which is only way of progess and pray that we realize this collectively before turning into fossils!

[@chiraghbaloch9164]

I usually watch your lectures sir but this one touched my heart. A very well-researched, mind blowing, and comprehensive lecture on the topic - indeed all your videos are. Keep guiding us, sir! Stay blessed!

[@19665061]

Nature is not just material or materialistic, it's beyond our understanding. Philosophy of the metaphysical realm is secondary job. Primary task is Asim Munir. 🤗

[@MaulviWithAnAttitude-b5u]

VIRTUAL vigo is coming for you😆

[@msaqii7301]

LoL

[@sapien307]

Black vigo is comming 🤣😂😂👌

[@19665061]

​@@sapien307Digital arrest 😄

[@19665061]

👍​@@sapien307

[@ShujaQureshi786]

Scholars like you are laying the foundation of Renaissance in the Muslim world. Thank You!

[@Nangyalay]

I am fascinated by your conviction to educate people like us. This channel is the only relevant channel I have ever seen. I have learned a lot from you. You always provide irrefutable evidence. I must appreciate your hard work. Keep enlightening us.

[@MrMuhammadsabir1]

Sir , You explained this difficult , mysterious and complex philosophical paradigm in a very simplistic way , Thanks & stay blessed

[@Knvdialogue]

Knowledge , thoughts and changes occured in 3700 yearz summarised in 37 Minutes. This is amazingly brilliant This and such other videos based factual Knowledge be shared with all schools, colleges and universities as they still live in stone age Keep smiling and shining 🎉🎉❤

[@AI-links786]

ارتقاء ہر گز مذہب یا فطرت کے خلاف نہیں۔۔۔۔بلکہ عین فطرت ہے ۔۔۔۔فطرت دو طریقوں سے کام کرتی ہے ایک ننانوے فیصد ریڈی میڈ نیچرل لاز کے تحت جو اللہ عزوجل نے پروگرام پہلےہی کر دیے۔۔۔دوسرا کبھی کبھار براہ راست ذات پاک کی توجہ خاص کے تحت۔۔۔۔

[@manmohanmehta5697]

Very nice lecture. Acceptance of truth with proof is the way forward.

[@BitterTruth200]

Bohat hi umda video jitni bhi tareef ki jae kum ha

[@Taimur_Laal]

Please share as much as possible.

[@BitterTruth200]

@@Taimur_Laal yes sir i am keep sharing your informative videos and i will for sure

[@ajaypatra2863]

Excellent ! A great pleasure to listen to the video. Contains the summary of the history of intellectual activities of mankind.

[@mirzafarhatsaeed3321]

Denis Noble's critique of Darwin's original theory of evolution (as opposed to neo-Darwinism) focuses on certain foundational aspects of Darwin's ideas, though it is important to note that Noble critiques Darwin more for the framework's limitations than for its revolutionary impact at the time. His key points of contention include: 1. Natural Selection as the Sole Driver Darwin's Theory: Emphasizes natural selection as the primary mechanism by which evolution occurs. Noble’s Critique: Noble argues that natural selection alone cannot account for the complexity of life. He believes evolution is influenced by multiple interacting processes, including cooperation, symbiosis, and the role of physiological systems in directing adaptation. 2. Gradualism Darwin's Theory: Suggests that evolution occurs gradually through small, incremental changes over long periods of time. Noble’s Critique: Noble points out that evolutionary changes are not always gradual. He highlights evidence of saltation (sudden, large changes) and rapid adaptations facilitated by mechanisms like genome restructuring and epigenetic modifications, which Darwin's theory did not account for. 3. Variation and Randomness Darwin's Theory: Assumes variation arises randomly and is shaped by natural selection. Noble’s Critique: Noble challenges the idea that variation is purely random. He highlights how organisms can induce variations in response to environmental stresses, suggesting a more dynamic and interactive process than Darwin envisioned.

[@ShayanAli-l1x7b]

Explained in super simple words 🎉

[@alirazasyed2763]

As always thanks sir🎉🎉

[@ayeshanoor6946]

Such an informative video! We need more critical minds like you.

[@imtiazahmad6694]

نہایت عمدہ کام کر رہے ہیں آپ ❤

[@RashidAli800]

Thanks Sir, inlighting us and lecture provide us fruit for thought

[@populartalkshak]

It is always an honour to listen to you.

[@deendayal804]

Salute you Sir ji, please keep it up.

[@saleemsada786]

Lot of thanks for valuable content to Change our old mentality

[@NaseerAhmadkhan-y1g]

👍we studied in Fsc concept of alternation of generation in biology conversion of sporophyte generation to gametophyte and vice versa

[@abdullahelannoor5173]

بہت مزا آیا بہت بہت شکریہ آپ سے التجا ہے کہ کن کن سائنسدانوں کا قتل ہوا تھا اس پر بھی ایک ویڈیو ضرور بنائیں جیسا کی اپنے ذکر کیا Thank you once again ❤

[@sajidfarooq2537]

#Sir Taimur Lal Sahab u brilliant 😊

[@ashrafalam6075]

Respected Professor, I am admirer of your lectures. Only for information, Books of Dr Bashir Uddin Mehmood and Istanbul School of English on KZbin are worth reading and watching. Both are crystal clear explanations of Islam. Thanks for Educating.

[@Theriverflows]

Bashiruddin hahaha? Woh jinnon se bijli bananay wala???

[@kassimtufail9061]

Very well done amazing impressive information great job 👏🏼

[@okvideos5228]

love you for this evolution series ❤❤❤❤

[@khizirali]

Please one lecture on Iqbal's philosophy 🙏

[@shahsaadat7577]

"In the realm of nature, where science holds sway, A new world unfolds, like a lotus in May. China's prowess in technology, a marvel to behold, A testament to human ingenuity, young and old. The philosopher's heart, aflame with curiosity's fire, Yearns to grasp the secrets of the universe's grand design. In the crucible of science, old notions are refined, As the cosmos yields its mysteries, one by one, in time.

[@zafariqbal-ey5nk]

Doctor sahb ap jis mullk ma rehte hen yahaan ehtyat zaroori ha,apna boht sa khayal rakhna

[@adventurouskashmir7341]

I have request. Could you please make a lecture on posthumanism and its idea of human and also the renewed understanding of human and nature

[@arshadkayani5972]

Excellent talk

[@syedfasih74]

Good lecture 👍

[@IMKhan-ze4zm]

Great knowledgeable video, keep it up and enlightened us❤

[@AI-links786]

ایک مثال سمجھیں کہ ایک اعلی افسر اپنے نایب کو دفتر بٹھا کر جاتا ہے کہ فلاں کام ایسے فلاں کام ایسے کرنا ہے ۔۔۔۔وہ نایب اس کام کو ننانوے فیصد ویسے ہی کرنے پر پابند ہے ۔۔لیکن کچھ مسایل ایسے ہیں جن میں وہ سمجھ نہیں سکتا۔۔۔۔تو دوبارہ اعلی افسر سے رابطہ سے معاملہ ہدایات کے مطابق حل کرتا ہے

[@SamarJohn456]

Kab tak logo ke modon pe ralh ke bandook chalao gy me Lord…. Just accept and be brave …… You have all options to move out of hell and enlighten so many more with more clarity.. still love you what you do

[@ajaypatra2863]

We see caterpillars turning into butterflies. A surface moving insect turns into a flying insect.

[@harrishameed3687]

Keep fighting the ignorance,we are with you.✊🏼

[@AsifKhan-bv3iu]

With ease and fluency you have explained dialectics of nature. Of course nature is changeable and human nature can also be changeable. By the change of mode of the production human nature can be changed. Cultural Marxist particularly the Frankfurt school of thought deliberately misinterpreted the Marxism and devirt the attention of the Marxism towards culture Marxism and laid down the foundation of anti- Marxism. Your lecture opens the vistas about true Marxism. The crux of the argument is without atheist worldview someone cannot seem to grasp and discern the true spirit of Marxism.

[@Rational-d6u]

Sir one lecture on " is philosophy relevant in present times and in future " or "The role of philosophy in present times and future "...

[@ramchandradey4059]

Thanks but i do request to kindly study deeply the philosophy of Sri Aurobindo , his innovative ideas on evolution of divine life ,mind overmind and supermind etc to feel the pulse and spirit of Indian Upanishadas overmind

[@SikandarKashfi]

18:02 *This fresco is not in the Sistine Chapel, it’s in the Apostolic Palace in Vatican City.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@SikandarKashfi When my wife and visited the Vatican. Watch it. kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5DPfGSrYr93oqs

[@rajamuzammilhassanhassan2373]

Thank you sir

[@mohammedashfaq835]

Some say that the fossil record lacks "transitional forms", or the in-between stages of one type of creature evolving into another. people argue that it is not a fact or is a theory in crisis

[@MrKamranhaider0]

The Quran touches upon the concept of the universe and its expansion in several verses. One of the most frequently cited verses in this context is from Surah Adh-Dhariyat (51:47), which states

[@subrinmukhia5080]

And your joker nalayak denies evolution.😂😂😂

[@MubashirHussainKhan]

I think Quran puts light on Evolition theory ...sura noor: 24:45.... And Allah has created from water every living creature. Some of them crawl on their bellies, some walk on two legs, and some walk on four. Allah creates whatever He wills. Surely Allah is Most Capable of everything. اور immutability پر بھی اللہ فرماتا ہے کہ وہ ہر روز ایک نئی شان سے جلوہ گر ہوتا ہے۔۔۔

[@yeezythabest]

Is there an English version of this lecture? Greetings from Senegal 🇸🇳

[@magrayfayaz1478]

Beautiful

[@arifkhan-sy1it]

Sir apsay parhnay walay philosophy k students lucky hon gain. Govt schools ko sehi krnay main kuch karain

[@malkiatsingh5143]

ਵਿਦਵਾਨ ਰੱਬ, ਅੱਲ੍ਹਾ, ਗੌਡ, ਈਸ਼ਵਰ ਆਦਿ ਐਵੇਂ ਘਸੋੜੀ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ, ਪਲੈਟੋ ਦੀ ਸੋਚ ਦੇ ਸਹਾਰੇ ਅਸੀ ਵਿਗਿਆਨ ਤੋਂ ਮੂੰਹ ਮੋੜ ਰਹੇ ਹਾਂ। ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਚਾਰਲਸ ਡਾਰਵਿਨ ਨੂੰ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਲੈਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ।

[@arifsaleem5467]

Google translator translates your last sentence as, "he should read Charles Darwin", is that what you mean?

[@prof.syedimtiazali6689]

Have you gone through Mulla Sadra's philisophy of Intrinsic Mobility حرکت جوھری? I feel your talk has to be comprehensive by mentioning this. I like your talks. Best of luck.

[@GR_Mplo]

Mulla sadra AAP Ki soch se bhi aage hain

[@mubarakahmad9656]

You're definitely and intellecutal person..I contradict your political thoughts but i do agree with many of your perspectives.

[@genz-off]

Sir you have to relax some second in your sentence it will be more interested and easy to lesson.

[@MuhammadAbdullah-bw7km]

I respect u a lot but I have a request for you apart from this video Don't put yourself in a box as there is an increasing polarisation in world right now At the end of the day we are all humans and share a lot of things among ourselves I would love to see u sitting with people of opposite views not for debate but for friendly conversation When u limit yourself to ur boxes it becomes easier for 'haves' to exploit 'have nots' Sit with them and raise voice for our common interests like justice rights etc We can CO-EXIST

[@Taimur_Laal]

I don't put myself in boxes. Others do.

[@krishnakantvijay824]

Ultimate reality.

[@SaadKhan-b3z9u]

Good

[@alirazasyed2763]

Even the Concept of God is in evolution. Today i think Hardly an individual believe that God order him to sacrifice his beloved son for.HIS happiness

[@19665061]

Does our thinking and way of thinking affects/dusturbs inanimate lifeless matter?

[@19665061]

I think the terms "spiritual", "spiritualism", "spirituality" of Henry George would better fit and explain the point you wish to make instead of "divinity" or "divine".

[@19665061]

Question : What is energy (define)? Answer: Energy is of several types! ... That's an example of escapism & incompetence! 😊

[@arifsaleem5467]

As if you know what energy is. 😂

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467No one knows but everyone uses this term.

[@19665061]

Nature/Cosmos is naturally way beyond material (solid, gas, liquid, plasma). Not to say angles, sky and underwater realm points towards light orbs, ETs, aliens comrades.

[@msaqii7301]

Means Tabdeli agyei nahi Tabdili shuru sa chall rehi ha..😮

[@TheRationalLeft]

Absolute agree

[@drirbazawan1247]

No Qaiser Raja is harmed in this video 😂

[@19665061]

He, this man Raja is hacking my comments on LVT on a separate video on the economic system of taxation in Islam.

[@azadprinda3186]

Aggar science main taraqi krni hai to uskalia mazhab side py rakh k . rational mind sa sochna zruri ha. Mazhab ki ainak lga k ham science ko kabhi nhe samjh sakty

[@deebaparveen6010]

Sura Rehman 55:49 Is asking us this theory

[@arifsaleem5467]

What does it say?

[@deebaparveen6010]

@ you can see in Quran please

[@arifsaleem5467]

@@deebaparveen6010 I can't go around chasing, cross checking, examining and evaluating every reference and hint people drop or mention in their comments, it's on you to provide a brief description of your claim along with details of the reference, so one can decide if it's worth the hassle to investigate any further. So, please state what it says or I would have to assume that you yourself don't know anything about it.

[@aliqasim9157]

Wow

[@HarisA1i]

Sir agr har cheese change or evolute krti ha to qaisar Raja ki evolution kio ni hoti?

[@heartfeltteaching]

Har 🧀 change aur evolute nahin karti 😂

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@HarisA1i some things take longer to change :)

[@Dangerboy-45357]

@@Taimur_Laal Waah sir kia baat kee hai app nai♥️♥️♥️♥️😍😍

[@shamsindhi6827]

Lal salam❤❤❤❤

[@MehmoodQureshi-u8o]

🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@19665061]

Metaphysics obviously takes us beyond physical world. What's beyond that transcends us? Did Marx explore this world? No! Why? His belief in making this PHYSICAL universe better for humans was unparalleled.

[@arifsaleem5467]

What is metaphysics?

[@razashahpehlvi6589]

❤

[@Rational-555]

Science always push religions to evolve..... so they interpret religious books differently. 😂

[@rekibhumanity9703]

👍

[@19665061]

Is this the way to do science and philosophise? A specimen: What's the "origin" of universe? What existed before "Big Bang"?

[@heartfeltteaching]

There is no before the Big Bang because the Big Bang itself is t=0

[@arifsaleem5467]

The concept of existence is limited by time and space.

[@19665061]

Time and space are constructs of mind. ​@@arifsaleem5467

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467These are constructs of mind

[@myslant]

1. Wese main ap ki kisi point se agree nai but ager man ly sub change ho raha he to ye changle ki ability universe main kese ai? 2. kia camra ki ijad k bad Species change hona band ho gai ? (ab ye ne kehna k is main time lagta ager lagta he to kitna lagta he is ka mtlb her time change he to ab bhi ho raha ho ga change ager ye bat bhi man ly to is se y ho ga k koi Species prfect ni hoi chay mtlb koi monky half monky hona chahy or half human ya half se ziyda ya kam bhi ho skta q k wo aik change k process main he na k just monkey balky sb Species hi adhi adhuri to honi change ho q k ager time lagta he to fish se start krty he wo abhi fish he kuch to tume guzra ho ga us ka or kitna time lagy ga ye kon decide kry ga) 3. wese koi exempl to ap ko bhi deni chay with evidence k kon Species abhi abhi change ho rhi kisi dosri Species main. 4. Ager koi keh dy kabhi kuch bhi change ho skta he or wo God ki trf se ho skta but bhi ap physics law main change ni mano gy kaho gy jese law usi trah hi ga but kis physics k law create kiy? 5. ager her cheez k pichy cuse he to nature kis ne create ki or ager khud hoi to kia cause he? 1st step se batana. 6. ye kese man ly k science abhi sb sahi bata rhi he or wo bina evidence like Big Bang where is the evidence no body can prove this. 7. science k pass boht c baton k jawbat ni kab se science ho rhi ger hoty to abi tk ap unhi pornai debate main na phase hoty like start kese hova? 8.aik bachon wali kahani suna di jati je k africa k log black q un hight ziyda q and chineds ya west main log white q ya hight kam k african k hisab se to ye dekho evolution sabit ho but bhai jan kia wo africa k log insan se kuch or bna gay hain ya chainge kuch bn gay hain insan hi hian or ager ye kaha jay hum is ly kisi Specie ko kisi dosri Specie main change hoty nai dikha skty q k time lagta he but ye color change hight change to 2nd 3rd main bhi show ho jata he ager koi african kisi chines se shadi kry to next gen hi change ho jay gi. 9. kaha jata he k human k DNA monky se 90% ya is ziyda match hoty hain to phir to sy sb Species aik hi Specie se hain to sb k match hony chay? !0. 1st cell kese bana? Abhi boht kuch he likhny ko but man thak gaya bhchon wali kahinya chory dy Lalal Sb

[@Theriverflows]

Oh bhai koi kitab parh le. Apni taraf se Philosoper banay hwy ho. These are basic questions. Read a book before trying to appear smart

[@myslant]

@@Theriverflows basic question ka answer to ker do 1st cell kese kider se aya or prove bhi kerna he.

[@myslant]

Ager in basice questions k answer hoty to bhai ye debate hi khatam ho jati wo question wese k wese hi hain koi prove bhi day diya kro jub kisi book main kisi kuch likh deny se answer nai samj lety

[@Theriverflows]

@ again. Read a goddamn book instead of arguing in comments here. Not wasting my time on your childish idiocy

[@hussaindarvlogs8518]

​@@myslantyar ap ko ja kar evolution ke bare mein proper biologists ke lecture sunane chahiye kiun ke bhai ap ke first almost sare questions ke answer diye ja chuke hein

[@19665061]

Physicists do more of mathematics than philosophy!That too when they're religious (spiritualists). This is paradoxical and problematic that needs proper diagnosis, understanding and solution. Mathematics follows a set childish logic. Philospphy follows dialectic-logic, if at all philosophy is truly interested in pursuing truth.

[@arifsaleem5467]

What truth, the one you yourself concocted, brainwashed into, or chose to believe without evidence? And what method do you suggest to find and verify that so-called personal unverified and unverifiable truth? Please enlighten us all.

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467Asim Munir is the present truth. Zia was truth in the past...

[@AbdulRasheed-zj3bj]

No not at all, physical description never negates metaphysicality Sir you have described physical enitieies and laws rather metaphysical Decort physical and metaphysical principles are much different sir You ate not new one just confusing commeners sir 😊

[@arifsaleem5467]

BTW, what is metaphysics?

[@faisalkhan-pv8dt]

In my opinion sir, you have confused mutation with flux/change. They are not same things. Are they? 2ndly, Science and so evolution works on the physical spectrum, not metaphysical, and it can't if it tries. i think, evolution doesn't negate the metaphysical fixity. The idea of love is not immutable; the principle is same, although the forms can be different. Another way to represent this is to say that even if evolution is proven to be the fact of all biological existence, it doesn't negate the existence of metaphysical essence (all the possible mutations, although we cannot predict, are already fixed, and whether A turns to be A1 or A2, both possibilities were preconceived) It's like I have got 4 different genes, i can predetermine what type of entity turns out of 24 possible.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@faisalkhan-pv8dt mutation is only one form of evolutionary change. As I have explained in previous videos there are actually several mechanisms of evolutionary change. Yes science works on the physical level. Metaphysics are theoretical principles derived from observation of the physical world. Not vice versa

[@faisalkhan-pv8dt]

@Taimur_Laal i have another question sir, if metaphysical concepts are not fixed what's the point of human progress? Is not science and all the disciplines are striving for that perfection? Ideal? In whatever aspect that may be. If metaphysicals are derived from the physical and not vice versa everything becomes random and deterministic, there is no point whatsoever in theorizing. Morals and values all too goes down the dustbin when science become scientism and evolution becomes darwinism. Standing on the random matter and talking about ideals and morals are self-contradictory.

[@hammadhussain4422]

I have listened the whole lecture and can't understand what was the purpose of this effort. So the philosophers in the past made an error on a " minor detail" like you said regarding neo darwinism in response to denise nobel interview recently. " So what , minor errors doesn't refute anything". are you trying to make a case that the science couldn't have grown so far unless platonic teachings were debunked ? So what , human being were still engaging in science to an extent like ever . It was not the case where human race could have wiped out because of platonic teachings / philosophy. Materialistic approach or materialization of science has also draw backs hindering the growth of science . Please watch dr. Rupert Sheldrake's work regarding how science is broken. Furthermore, it seems you imply that human race as some kind of obligation to grow science particularly science of this era . How did you get there ? Can't we sacrifice the modern science for greater good ? You can change everything as long as it doesn't hurt THE PURPOSE OF EXISTENCE OF MANKIND i.e submission to the God .

[@umarmalik6590]

What happened if pluto and these philosophers are right and science proof this?

[@Dangerboy-45357]

Mughey lagta hai kai ye lecture sunney key baad qaisar raja ki aqal thikaney aa gai hoon gee 😂😂😂

[@19665061]

Is the universe aware that Homo Sapiens invented Capitalism? 😀

[@arifsaleem5467]

We are not separate from the universe, we are a part of it, so if we know something, a part of the universe also knows.

[@19665061]

​@@arifsaleem5467A part, not whole?

[@arifsaleem5467]

@@19665061 Yes a part, only a specific part, like a dead buffalo or Andromeda can't know what you know, even if you knew it all and vise versa.

[@Barlas511]

Taimur these matters are beyond your pea brain.

[@Taimur_Laal]

In that case, thank you for taking the time to listen.

[@krishnakantvijay824]

Many many live species are disappeared. How divine force work.

[@owaiskhanday99]

Debate Qaiser Ahmad Raja

[@heartfeltteaching]

Why should Taimur waste his time with that fool 😂

[@owaiskhanday99]

@heartfeltteaching what's foolish in doing a debate. Come man up!

[@arifsaleem5467]

Cancer Raja the famous biologist, AKA. famous bullshitiologist.

[@MuhammadAbdullah-bw7km]

Get a life bro😂😂😂

[@ghulambrohi8637]

پہلے حصے میں لگا کہ مجھے ویڈیو نہیں دیکھنی چاہیے اور آخری حصے میں اتمنان ہوا آپ نہیں بدلے ہمیں بدلنا چاہتے ہیں بس ذرا سا مذہبی ٹچ کے ساتھ

[@sagheerahmed9839]

Still raja sab believe in immutable

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

Sir, totally disagree with you your all lecture because divine guidance can not be get from books it can only gain from heart to heart .

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 that is also written in books. For example that is one of the main ideas of Rumi.

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

@Taimur_Laal no. Sir that is just expressed but no one can get it in this language of words. Divine guidance is beyond words and language barrier

[@arifsaleem5467]

​​@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 Either you got it from a book or from a person who read it in a book, at the end it's still a book written by someone who coined this concept, unless you coined it yourself.

[@umerkhyam686]

Dear heart is just a pumping organ and nothing else,this biological interpretation of your divine scriptures is wrong,it was actually Aristotelian biological concept which is rejected by today modern biological understanding

[@notadane]

Please keep doing what you're doing, Prof. But organically. Please don't get into a dialectic with the not-so-grand inquisitors of Pakistan, who are trying to make common cause to try to bait you into debate. Sincerely, Random online admirer.

[@shamshadkazmi9778]

Chasma laga ke aaya na professor wala look 🤓

[@19665061]

Philosophers and others including ourselves should not use the terms "nature", "universe" , "cosmos" etc. loosely and interchangeably. Then Allah-tala and God can't be explained. Nomenclature task leads us to confusion and violence.

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

Absolutely right. Actually spirituality can not be explained in words or this language there is no language for that , that only need heart listening to understand spiritual or divine knowledge or or divine guidance about actual world or what is purpose of life .

[@adeelarshadwattoo8584]

Divine guidance or metaphysical etc can not be get from books that's divine and that demand other form of prerequisites

[@arifsaleem5467]

​@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 What other form of prerequisites?

[@subrinmukhia5080]

Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool.

[@sastriji9547]

Enternal hone ka matlab ye nhi ki kisi ne bnaya Hain 😂😂😂😂😂

[@MubashirHussainKhan]

Metaphysics concept also exists as Islamic terminology...LOH E MEHFOOZ...

[@noorahmed2862]

Qaisar raja seems to have made you mad so instead of focusing on economics which is your subject you are confused and making your followers focused on such topics. Anyway, after AI what is left to you professors to tell the students.

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@noorahmed2862 AI is an echo chamber. You can get whatever answer you require from it. Professors are needed to advance knowledge.

[@arifsaleem5467]

Cancer the famous bullshitiologist?

[@murtazakhanshah3740]

In this 37:17 video not a single word is confusing but to understand it needs some I Q level which is beyond the capacity of followers of Qaiser Raja who is living in medieval era

[@alliswell3711]

Lal Salam

[@avtardhanjal-z3c]

Aap ko khulkar kahna chahiye

[@hammadsiddiqui3263]

Read Quran carefully Evolution prove by Quran by God.

[@19665061]

If teleology (final cause, fixed purpose) is given, i e. Nature/Cosmos/Universe just EXISTS 'per se' then... --hello Big Bang Theorists, kindly pay attention to Aristotle!

[@Taimur_Laal]

@@19665061 that’s the point. It is not given.

[@19665061]

​@@Taimur_LaalRight, if universe has no teleology, then does it have ontology --principle of being/ coming into being like ontology of say labor? Second, aren't physicists on the wrong path in so far as they strive after the "ORIGIN" of the universe? On lighter note, just because they're being paid salaries and perks and allowances so they're at leisure to invent any problem falling and rising in the realm of vague amorphous "origin"?

[@Taimur_Laal]

@ universe does not have an ontology. We have an ontology about the universe.

[@19665061]

​@@Taimur_LaalWe have many things which are irrational. Like Big Bang, origin of universe, pre-Big Bang v. Post-Big Bang, and so on