Tamron 17-70mm Lens for Fujifilm Review

[@paulasimson4939]

I got this lens recently and it's an absolute dream. I do a lot of low light event photography, and this has been perfect. I love the constant 2.8 aperture. I've also been traveling with it paired with the XT4 and the weight has been just fine for walking around with it for hours.

[@nAcolz]

Is your lens quite noisy when zooming?

[@paulasimson4939]

@@nAcolz No, I don't find it noisy at all when zooming. I used it recently to shoot an event in a theatre and it was very unobtrusive.

[@sandygeorge196]

Any good light and durable camera cases you could recommend for this combination of lens and camera body?

[@paulasimson4939]

@@sandygeorge196 I like the Peak Design 3 Litre Sling

[@azizzbulut]

could you please compare it with fuji 16-80? Which one do you prefer

[@erwinphillips4412]

I bought the 17-70 and trade in my 16-80. What a difference in versatility and low light quality. The lens has macro like qualities and is more versatile than the 16 to 80

[@erwinphillips4412]

Cant wait for the 11-20

[@pal2tech]

Don't forget to use PAL2TECH70 promo code for 70% off Audiio. =====Also...===== Once upon an editing dreary, while I exported, weak and weary, Over many a render and export video of lens review lore- While I exported, wanting quicker, suddenly there came a flicker, A strange, bizarre green flicker, flickering at 3:06, and maybe more “’Tis some error,” I tell you, “stupid Mac graphics card and FCPX rendering- Only this and nothing more.” --- Edgar Allen Poe (with some help from Pal2tech)

[@willsstills]

Hi Chris 🖐🙂 I just want to thank you for all your help, all your tutorials etc. You are by far the most helpful channel for (Fujifilm) photographers and I've learned so much thanks to you. Thank you very very much for all your effort. Keep on going, stay healthy and kind regards from Will in the Netherlands. 👊😎👍

[@AndreasRavnestad]

Great review, thank you very much! I was wondering about two things: 1) At 07:57 it may look like the focal point is just slightly further back. It sort of looks like the tip of the shell on the lego turtle is in focus and quite sharp? 2) At 08:48 perhaps the lens would perform better if it was in manual focus mode? Have you noticed any differences there with regards to parfocality?

[@donaldjames3840]

I purchased this lens 2 weeks ago for a trip to st.thomas.. unfortunately some of my vacation was spent inside due to hurricane Fiona, but I did get a decent amount of time with it for video and photos. I was very happy with the af in video and stills ... tracking was always on point. I was honestly surprised how good this lens was over all. The IS paired with inbody on the xt4 left me with really nice tac sharp hand held night images. Image wise my only mehh feelings come from its natural color. Shooting jpg, I just felt color was very muted. Only real dislike is lack of aperture ring. Thank you to tamron for this little best of a lens.

[@nate_thenotso_great]

I do not miss the aperture ring as much as I thought I would. This is just as good as any Fuji lens I’ve tried. I would like to get a body with IBIS as well, but for stills, it’s fantastic all on its own!

[@dog4mike]

Before switching from Nikon FF to Fujifilm two years ago, my Nikon kit included the holy trinity in the Tamron V2 series (which this has the look of). I had compared them to the Nikon counterparts prior to purchase and in most cases, the Tamrons were either just as good, and in some cases even better than the top-of-the line Nikkors. To my eye at least, just my opinion. 30 years ago I started my photography journey by buying what I could afford, meaning cheap glass. I had some Sigmas, Tamrons and Tokinas. I couldn't get out of them fast enough, they were just never as good as Nikkors. So it took something special to change my mind all those years later, and I think Tamron knocked it out of the park. Haven't tried Tamron for Fujifilm yet, but I would have a go, no hesitation.

[@keefbigman]

You know Tamron makes some Nikkors for Nikon? Some are even just rebadged!

[@jambob169]

Looking at this as a weather sealed alternative to my 18-55mm. All the other options either have a smaller aperture or no OIS. This ticks all the boxes for aperture, OIS, and weather sealing. The only thing holding me back is the size, but I think I'll eventually end up picking it up.

[@JuanKis]

Fantastic!! One big important thing about Tamron, they use to have 6 years of warranty, yes six!!! Not sure if they still have the same. But the lenses are great!

[@LeslieBigos]

I am really happy with my 16-80. I hope you will revisit that lens. I would sure miss an aperture ring on the Tamron.

[@mr.b4444]

Thanks for the review. I own the Fuji 16-80mm and it is a great lens. Mine is very sharp and contrasty and I'm not experiencing the issues that you had with it. Other than an extra f stop, I don't see any real advantage to the Tamron at that price. Now the bargains are with the Sigma Fuji mount lenses because they run about half the price of the Fuji. I picked up a Sigma 56mm 1.4 last week and it out performs the Fuji 56 1.2 I got rid of last year in almost all areas. Tamron could do better on that price if they want to be more competitive.

[@bermyuwu1802]

please give updated review of the 16-80 please!!!

[@TungstenOvergaard]

I’m in love with 16-80. I have 18mm, 35, 56mm primes (apart from 13mm and 85mm Viltrox) and nothing can substitute my Fuji 16-80mm. Give it a new try!

[@mortenthorpe]

Hmm… the 16-80 is my least used lens… but maybe that has a few reasons… 1. I shoot either super long, or super wide, and the 16-80 is not the best for either case… the SamYang 12 mm is fantastic, and so is their 135 mm f2… if you can afford a GFX, then the Laowa 17 mm f4 is very nice! The gf 32-64 is phenomenal! The XF 50-140 2.8 is also super nice, and quickly becoming a fixture on my x-t3, while the 100-400 is hanging off the x-h2s, with the awesome new autofocus!

[@TungstenOvergaard]

@@AlexChristian Yeah. We all want a 13-400 f1.4 with OIS, 400 grams maximum, and for 300$. I’m frustrated too 😩 I don’t understand why Cartier-Bresson was not frustrated with a single camera/focal length. Damn it!

[@Bocsaphoto]

@@TungstenOvergaard 13-400 f1.4 isn't versatile enough. What if i wanna shoot wider? or really really tight? I think an 8-900mm f1.0 is better. Shouldn't be hard to design one under 300g.

[@jeroentune333]

@@AlexChristian why limiting? Where do you use it for ?

[@TungstenOvergaard]

@@AlexChristian yeap, very limited potential. 5th best selling lense in their lineup since launch, and 1st on zooms. What daring is ignorance.

[@dave.mac.d]

I sold my Fuji 16-80 and 16 2.8 for this lens and I have no regrets! Great for photo and video. I did also pick up a cheap used 15-45mm for when I want something small and compact for fun.

[@mr.b4444]

I have that 15-45 also, it's a great light weight lens but I hate that power zoom.

[@pawirosukar.cc123]

based on your experience, is the color/tone produced by tamron much different from fuji? for me the resulting tone is very important. Thank you

[@dave.mac.d]

@@pawirosukar.cc123 It's very similar, I haven't noticed much of a difference from my Fuji lenses.

[@pawirosukar.cc123]

if they are similar, tamron is a very good alternative

[@matchesder]

Hi Pal, the image Quality test for higher f numbers at 5:00 seems to be influenced by increasing ISO Noise. Sharpness can be better judged if the the image shows the same for every focal length. I. e. go near for wide angle and far for tele. It would be interesting how it compares to the Fuji 16-55/2.8. I think compared to the other Fuji lenses it’s a no brainer because of the constant 2.8 aperture of the Tamron.

[@Mathew-vlogs]

I picked up this lens almost 2 months ago. And it’s my favorite lens. I do miss having an aperture ring, but for everything this lens is, it’s worth the loss there for me.

[@procolotetsa5292]

Thank you. A direct comparison with the xf16-80 would have been interesting. I would go with the Fuji lense, it's smaller, better build quality, aperture ring on the lens, fixed F4 aperture and better focal range.

[@SMGJohn]

Of course its smaller its F4, this is a F2.8 zoom lens LOL...

[@stephenrobinson9923]

I have been considering paring the Tamron 17-70 with my Fuji 70-300 +1.4TC for a two lens do everything set.

[@gripperharris]

I came to the same decision... its a great setup, I use them with either my xs10 or xt30..... its great, they weigh very little and gives me fantastic flexibility

[@Exercises10]

Good video, Chris. I was just out on a photo shoot with a Tamron rep. I had a compact camera and did not have a chance to try his lenses. Someday, could you explain in your videos what elements and groups mean in a lens? Thanks for your time and for sharing this informational video!

[@ivanstevens]

Thanks for the review, I personally own the 16-80 f4 which I have found to be pretty darn good, even in low light. Love it’s size and the fact it has an aperture ring makes it for me a great travel lens. For more depth of field I use my 35 f2 prime.

[@redrocklead]

That ISO 2500 shot of Omar is the best he's ever looked.

[@helgefrederiksen4102]

🤓👍

[@CharlonSerrano]

Really looking forward for this lens! Thanks for the time reviewing it!!!

[@jasperjohnclaro2663]

Thanks for the review Chris!! Another option for the X system!!

[@Ivanophilia]

hello Chris, thanks for the review. i still think the 16-80 is the better lens, especially for its colors and the focal range..the tamron colors look a few steps on the cool side.

[@d0gwalker]

I’ve got the Tamron 18-300 for my X-T4 and my one criticism (versus my Fujinon lenses- the 16-80 and the 10-24WR) is that it misses focus sometimes. I generally shoot buildings or other static subjects so it’s nothing to do with face/eye detection or focus tracking. It doesn’t put me off using the 18-300, but I know to check every shot for focus straight after, and sometimes I need to re-take. Of course the 17-70 might be different.

[@GenericaQwerty]

I had, and sold, my Tamron 18-300 (I'm also using an X-T4) for the same reason. I was having a lot of trouble with the focus being unreliable. I have other Tamron lenses and love them, so I'm hopeful this was just a one off. It could have been the perfect lens!

[@robertcudlipp3426]

Did you return the lens to Tamron under warranty stating your issues? I don't have or really want that lens, however it has been universally highly reviewed and I have not seen any real world users, as opposed to reviewers, do anything but praise the lens. Could you have received a poor unit?

[@d0gwalker]

@@robertcudlipp3426 That's a good question, but I'm not sure one way or the other. Most of the time it's fine - and when it does miss focus it's not so bad or so frequent that it seems like a technical fault. More like an annoying idiosyncrasy that I put down to the third party lens protocols not always playing nicely. But maybe I'm wrong. Too late to return it now - and sadly it doesn't have a USB-C port for firmware updates, unlike a handful of other Tamron zooms.

[@anthonytriana4209]

Great review! Very thorough in testing and explanation. Thank you!

[@FlorianCortese]

Thanks for this review Chris!

[@muhammadaiman4178]

Great video man! I was waiting for this lens review to Fujifilm users for a while. Love your videos. Keep up!

[@KiR_3d]

I've heard few times that Fujinon's "focus breathing" is a conflict between the focus part and the object tracking part. Try to vary settings to less "instant" for tracking... If you still have such issues on any Fujinons.

[@mongini1]

Hey Pal, i think you just missed focus on the 70mm macro shot. 8:04 - you can see that the shell of that ninja turtle is sharp (the brownish part behind the shoulder).

[@unusedTV]

8:00 the soft image at 70mm minimum focus distance looks like a bit of a focus miss, doesn't it? It looks like the shoulders are sharper than the face, and they're ever so slightly further back.

[@JStevenSanders]

Based on this review I ordered it. It just arrived and it is impressive. It balances well on the XH2S and zooms smoothly. I also returned my 16-80 and my 18-55. With the pancake 27 this makes a great travel/cruise ship kit. My 10-24 and 70-300 don’t get a lot of use. I do like the XF 23 and 33 too for low light moments. Thanks for all you do.

[@disthymia6929]

I've been wondering which lenses to get for my X-E3. I bought it used and it came with the 18-55mm. How much better is this in comparison? I was also considering the 27mm prime just for casual days. How do you like that one?

[@collinsal1433]

@@disthymia6929 I have the XE-4 with the 27mm pancake and I really like it! Great small lens

[@iRabb]

This was a great review as usual, but I have to point out that you mentioned an aperture ring as a plus for the 16-55. I know you didn't love it, but the 16-80 also has a marked ring. I'm a stills guy so the focus wobble isn't a problem for me.

[@lionheart4424]

I also own the 16-80mm F4 as my very first Fuji lens. I love it for hikes and daylight shoots.

[@tomleo4670]

Thanks a lot for another great and fair review. I however have to say that I tested the Tamron and found on my copy several annoyances, so I am sending it back. The autofocus was hunting quite a bit, the image quality on the X-T5 did not really convinced me (maybe the 40mp is too much for the Tamron) and also the stabilization of lens made weird sounds.. so overall.. nothing for me. Unfortunately.

[@soundtempleAU]

8:00 Sorry but I have to point something out. I think at 70mm there is no issue with the lens but photographer :) you can clearly see that you've just missed the focus. Look over turtle's left shoulder... see the edge of the shell.. it's sharp. Same thing with that stuff he's holding in his right hand...sharp. At that distance even at f/8 the dof is very shallow so it's easy to make mistake.

[@edc5338]

I have this lens for my Sony A6600. Great lens! Looking at the XT-5 now and this lens would be great as a travel lens.

[@AnikiF]

Cristal clear, as usual. Thanks, Chris, well done!

[@ivanchan7337]

Light weight is very Important. If u always use F8 aperture, 16-80 is very good for you. Always shoot in low light 17-70 is suitable for you. If u already have 16-80, u can add sigma 30mm 1.4 for your low light shoot.

[@jonathanlogan6953]

Great video Chris! Thanks for sharing your insights

[@keefbigman]

Great lens. I had this on my A6700. Now I have it on my X-H2. Yes it has a few focus fails & doesn’t handle zooming with video but that’s because Fuji doesn’t have the Sony focusing system. Overall the results are fantastic. Not bothered about raperture rings, got used to that when I moved from film to digital. That shouldn’t hold you back.

[@PacksMarker]

Been waiting for this! ❤️

[@robertcudlipp3426]

I have just seen this excellent and very practical video. Am an owner of the XT20, XT20 and XS10. Purchased an 18-135 Fuji as an all round lens. The 16-55 2.8 is really too limited in its focal range, for me, maybe not others? Also, it's too heavy and expensive for travel type needs. When this new Tamron lens in the Fuji mount is reviewed, no mention is even made of the 18-135 zoom. Will immediately be checking to see if it's still in production after putting up this post. The 18-60 has not been all that well reviewed, and not only because of the fixed f4. The new Tamron seems to have put a real cat among the pigeons so far as Fuji's mid range zooms are concerned. As an owner of the 18-135, tbh, have been sufficiently happy with it's performance not to immediately sell in favour of the Tamron. Also own a range of Fuji primes and the truly excellent Sigma 56 1.4. Tamron has really mounted a direct a value for money ass

[@robertcudlipp3426]

To finish, a direct valve for money assault on at least 2 of Fuji's zooms.

[@ArkCullberg]

Hi! Great video as always! I wonder what you think about tamron 17-70 compared to Sigma 18-50?

[@JECiappetta]

Fantastic review, as always. Seems like a great lens, but maybe not worth changing from the Fuji 18-55 kit? Love the Omar cameo!

[@RenmiyaAsakura]

I'm definitely getting this soon. I only have 18-55mm at the moment. And I don't even use the aperture ring. It's just annoying when my hand accidentally touch the ring and change the aperture and I don't even realize it.

[@balboa0621]

I just want to know how it performs on the 40 mp sensor vs the 16-55

[@stephanweiskorn6760]

Excellent video 📸!

[@andreaskampmiller7756]

Hm, comparing the minimal focus distance with the "Ninja Turtle", it seems that even the 70mm setting is sharp - at least the shoulders, chest and arms look quite sharp. Even the border of the turtle shell over the right shoulder looks crisp. Maybe the lens was slightly out of focus for the face?

[@chiefhorus5057]

I am currently trying out this lense right now and I love it

[@PrimeRsoul]

Now I'm not sure. This one, or the 16-80 f4? I used that last one on a friends X-T5, and I loved it (except for soft corners when approaching 80).

[@RandumbTech]

There's something I don't like about Tamron lenses. I can't quite put my finger on it, but they just don't do it for me. Sigma, on the other hand, makes really great gear at similar prices. For the same price, I'd buy a used 16-55 instead of the Tamron.

[@kka3676]

I've been wanting to hear this review. Thank you. Btw, at 2:18, I saw that there were some dust inside the lens. Did I see that correctly or is it just my eyes?

[@markkuhn9382]

Will it resolve 40 mega pixels on the new Fuji X-h2?

[@sammy_sam_leonardo]

This is a very interesting lens. I’m considering a zoom for studio product photos… this or the xf 16-55mm f2.8 are on my list. Do you think this Tamron will resolve 40mp? I wonder if zooming in video very slowly would be okay despite the non-parfocal design? Very helpful video! Thanks!

[@thomasphillips5850]

Great video Adam. The light was perfect. How did you leave with that light show going on? As you were leaving behind you was a hollowed out tree, I was hollering turn around look. I would have gone crazy!!! Thanks again great video.

[@luismeyer400]

Great video! I have an x-t5, and i want to buy the 16-55 2.8.. But some people are saying im internet that they are having bad experiences with the 16-55 2.8 and the new sensor, because this lense cannot resolve well the 40 mpx? What is your experience? Do you see any difference in sharpness and overall image quality between 26 mpx and your X-T5 (40 mpx)? Thanks!

[@Racsophoto]

Any one of you noticed a substantial delay on the camera power on with this lens? My Xt5 boots up in 1 second with any Fujifilm lens but takes like 3 seconds to get ready with this Tamron. It’s like making a diagnose of the VC system. I can hear the lens inside a few seconds, doesn’t seem to be a malfunction, it might be normal but indeed takes a bit longer than my Fujifilm lenses.

[@dan.allen.digital]

I think the Sigma 18-50 2.8 coming later this year will give us another travel lens to consider that is much more compact. That 17-70 looks a bit too big for a travel lens for my taste anyway. Curious how it will resolve 40mp sensors though

[@paceyombex]

You can look at it that way, but if you want one lens that could do (almost) everything 17-70 could allow you to do that. 50 vs 70 is a pretty significant difference in AOV. Not as versatile as the 18-300mm, but I think it's better than the 18-50 from Sigma, especially considering the Tamron is better in IQ (from what I can see), weather resistant, and has OIS. If you're on a budget and want a fast standard zoom lens, and you're willing to compromise on not having OIS, then Sigma is for you.

[@quikee9195]

​@@paceyombex Well, Sigma 18-50 is way smaller and lighter than Tamron (77mm 290g vs. 119mm 525g) so both will appeal to different users, which have different needs and priorities. I'm getting the Sigma when it will be available, because I want to pair it with X-T30 to get a super light travel combo and a combo for everyday shooting.

[@paceyombex]

@@quikee9195 Never said the Sigma was bad, it's way cheaper, and as you said way smaller and lighter. My case is for a versatile travel lens in one package. Yup the Sigma is smaller, but since you don't get as much reach, you may have to carry another lens to fill it, making your whole package bigger in general, you'll also have more thing to take care of. So yeah, if versatility and IQ is the main consideration, I'd say Tamron clearly wins. But, for your case Sigma is the better option since that lens is *tiny.*

[@alexandrerosenberg5277]

I went with the Tamron as it has image stabilization and the Sigma will not. Considering this and the more limited focal range it make sense for the Sigma to be smaller. I expect the Sigma to be good optically. More choices is always good.

[@americosequeira8670]

I tried this one with a Sony camera and enjoy it a lot. I'm expecting it arrives to Fujifilm to see how it performs. For a everyday carry zoom it seems to be a great option.

[@b-art.]

Hello Chris. Great video and review as always. I am considering this lens to my second hand X-T3 which I bought today. I have also one specific question regarding the X-T3. After buying this camera I checked the firmware version and I can see that it hasn't been updated since 3.10 or 3.20 version. Should I update firmware with each released version separately (one after another) or I should just install the latest update and all previously released will be instaled automatically? I will be grateful for help as I don't want to mess anything with the firmware. Thanks in advance

[@alexandrerosenberg5277]

AFAIK Firmware upgrade replaces the firmware in it's entirety. The really should not point in upgrading though each version. Just upgrade to the latest version directly.

[@b-art.]

@@alexandrerosenberg5277 Thanks a lot

[@juancamilotv]

02:18 It seems like all Tamron lenses have a dust problem. I've owned two Tamron lenses and both get dust in them easily.

[@SENTIENT.7]

Can you recommend a lens for video that will stay in focus when using the telephoto to zoom in and out? I loved this video - thank you!

[@mikeireland2428]

Excellent no nonsense review. One reason I love the channel. I agree that the Fuji 16-80 is not a video lens. And I like the idea of the focus ring (on the Tamron) being closer than the zoom ring.

[@georgimume6319]

I don't get the issue with focus breathing... what problem is it inv real life? You don't zoom while filming with ALL those lenses anyway. Maybe I'm missing something. I'd be tempted to trade in my 16-80 because of tamrons 2.8 but this thing seems huge! I have a tiny x s10....

[@Kuzumby]

Love the lens absolutely excellent for travel. I have noticed my X-T3 gets rather warm with image stabilization set on continuous with the Tam 17-70, I've never had that happen with my XF 70-300

[@datdudeinred]

Great review. Btw can you confirm if the inbuilt is works with fuji's sensor stabalization? It should shouldn't it?

[@MrYuppiedu]

It least with the X-H2s it does. So I think it also works with the X-T4

[@jmwvideography]

@@MrYuppiedu with my xh2s I get really bad micro jitters when shooting handheld video. the VC is the problem. Even with ibis off it still has the jitters. This lens is great on a gimbal or tripod. But terrible for handheld video.

[@bce.gatien]

I was waiting on your review. Tamron in on my shoping list.

[@daxvolfan]

That pic of Omar is great!!

[@9Mtikcus]

I'd love to see a comparison with the 16-80mm, and the new 18-120mm F/4.. I own the 16-80 and don't have the problems you experienced; however, it is also not a perfect lens. the new 18-120 interests me, and is a similar price in the UK as the Tamron (the 16-80 is a little cheaper, although out of stock). I also wish all manufactures put T stops on lenses or at least made it easier to find them as not all F/2.8 or F/4 lenses are the same for light gathering especially now, a lot of photographers are hybrid photo/video shooters and being able to swap a T 2.8 lens for a different T2.8 lens makes video life a lot easier etc

[@idirvivor]

Hey! I felt confident getting a Fuji when everyone around me was buying Canon and Nikon because of the videos you make! So thank you! Would you be able to make a comparison video with Tamron 17-70 and Fujinon 16-80/16-55?

[@DesertCookie]

I love that the new Fuji zoom is parfocal. It's going to be my new would-love-to-have lens for video. I'd love to see it at f2.8 instead of f4 but I'll take that and pair it with the new sensors to make up for some light loss.

[@sviraz]

Which fuji lens is parfocal? beside the sony mk one ?

[@DesertCookie]

@@sviraz the one released with the X-H2s a while ago. It has powerzoom too which makes it quite good for video work. Though it apparently still suffers from the exposure jumps on zoom.

[@sviraz]

@@DesertCookie if you are talking about 18-120 f4, it is not parfocal lens as AF motor still does micro adjustments while zooming in or out, which is visible. In the same way I could say my 50-140 is parfocal if i won't zoom in too quickly

[@DesertCookie]

@@sviraz Ah, what a shame. I just remember them presenting it as parfocal. I guess they stretched to definition by "making it parfocal through the AF-motor" which would be quite shady.

[@super-z8943]

I bet G2 version of this lens would be perfect. They released G2 versions of 28-75 and 80-180 already.

[@gundeepraj7246]

Nice video.. I bought this lens . very satisfied with my xt4 and even xh1 both IBIS bodies. And now it always glued to one my bodies always. But i wonder if its firmware can be updated.

[@navastaj]

Already I have tamron 18-300 ,Thank you Brother 💪💪💪

[@AMomentInTimeProductions]

it's a nice lens for the price, how ever i still love my 18-135 that lens is sharper then the Tamron 17-70 and you don't lose contrast at higher Aperture numbers like this lens and also i'm not getting any vignetting like that at all.. And my lens is around the same price so you might want to review that because it has more focal length available.. Cheers Donny

[@FrancoStrong92]

Ciao! I was wondering if you ever used the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR (that's the original kit lense I got from my new XT5) I'd like to ask you, if is worth sell this lens, buying the new Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RX D. I don't really care if is 85gr heavier, or a bit longer then fuji.. Even if it has less focal lenght, zooming. But that 2.8 makes me curious. 😀 Thanks from Sicily (Italy)

[@MrYano7771]

Всем доброго времени суток.Купил этот объектив для фуджа,работаю на видео!Во время зумирования объектив переходит в расфокус,сильный блур и потом после остановки зумирования картинка снова становится резкой.Это косяк объектива или надо прошивать линзу???🤔

[@taimurchoudhry.]

Great video... just two question, is the fuji 16-55 2.8 parfocal or not? And does the fuji red badge lens have any focus breathing issues? Thank you so much for all the effort.

[@americosequeira8670]

It is not. The only par focal lens is the new Fujifilm 18-120mm F4.

[@quikee9195]

​@@americosequeira8670 no, it's not - it's pseudo par-focal, where the focus difference is more exactly and smoothly compensated when zooming (probably because the zoom is by-wire so they always know how the zoom changed). A true par-focal lens doesn't change focus when zooming so there is nothing to compensate and the only par focal Fuji lenses are the MKX cinema lenses.

[@aukjes86]

Thank you for this great review video. I hope you can answer this question for me. I have the XT-4 and interested in buying the Tamron 17-70. Do the IBIS and lens stabilization work together?

[@tf-ok]

3:52 Didn't expect to see Omar here

[@samson40a]

Excellent review. I already have the 16-55 but as you said it is heavy. The Tamron looks like a great travel lens that is much cheaper.

[@AlexanderSartore]

I just bought this lens! I love it!

[@kmwong1786]

Does this lens take full advantage of 40MP of XH2?

[@BoopyTheFox]

Have one for Sony E, great lens! Also am actively switching to Fuji cuz tried X-T4 not so long ago and can confidently say that if it would have X-T3 screen, it would be my dream camera.

[@idahofallsmagazine3691]

2:37 No. It's meant to compete with Fuji's 16-55mm lens.

[@amitkrupal1234]

Is it really that good lens considering its just 50% more price to pay compared to XF 16-80 f/4 especially when brought with camera. Few youTubers mentioned its soft at f/2.8 at 70mm. So that means it has to stopped down to f/3.2 or f/4. then what's the use of ?

[@jennifergomez8095]

I LOVE your videos! Thank you so much! The fuji in this video is it xt3 or xt5?

[@richitacos]

XT3. He mentions it in the video.

[@pmcatarino]

Do you have a review of the Fuji 16-80? Which focus issues did you had that you had to return the lens? I was considering that one or this Tamron and I'm curious to know.

[@americosequeira8670]

The difference in image quality between the Tamron 17-70mm and the Fuji XF 16-55mm, is really that big? I ask this because I struggled in my decision to buy one of this lenses and I never saw a proper comparison between them to clarify this... Like I saw for the Sony e-mount between Sony 16-55, Sigma 18-50 and this Tamron... I leave the suggestion for a new video 🙂

[@aaronclinesmith2286]

Check out Christopher Frost's videos on both of those lenses.

[@americosequeira8670]

@@aaronclinesmith2286 I know those reviews but there’s no direct comparison…

[@aaronclinesmith2286]

@@americosequeira8670 he uses the same tests in all of his videos so you can directly compare lens performance. They showed the same differences in IQ I noticed between my copies of the 16-55 and 17-70. Better corner sharpness and contrast at all focal lengths for the Fuji. Gets a little soft at the long end for Tamron. The difference is not huge, but noticeable when zoomed in.

[@americosequeira8670]

@@aaronclinesmith2286 Thank you!

[@SquirrelHybrid]

"Cris Photography" did a direct comparison.

[@snapsbytoby]

I’m surprised no one mentioned the green flashing partway through the vid.

[@fabpicture_com]

Hello Pal2tech, about the "zoom in zoom out issue and parafocal", do you know a Fuji Zoom wich does not have this issue ? Thanks a lot for your work / test and everything !!

[@MustafaShaheen]

Thank you for this! I've been seriously eyeing it and if it ends up doing a good job of resolving the 40mp of the upcoming XH2, it'll be an instant buy.

[@marklaurendet1861]

Looks like a good lens but I found with the Tamron 18-300 that i had to disable the AF+MF as the manual focus ring gets bumped when cradeling the lens in the left hand too easily

[@rosacarravilla6208]

Gracias por el vídeo, que tengas un buen fin de semana, dos preguntas tienes algún video del objetivo 10_24 mm sería para la fuji xt4? Sabe porque la pantalla de dicha cámara,no se llena nunca, siempre parece que recorta? Gracias

[@frankfavale3872]

Chris, as always good info. Would you consider doing a “workflow” video. I’ve never had and often struggled with a coherent type of workflow to edit my photos. I’ve actually stopped editing my photos because I have no real cohesive workflow regimen. I’m frustrated. Thanks

[@MartinMuriel]

I got one of these recently but adobe lightroom applies an automatic lens correction to its images that shows black rings vignettes. Is anyone else having this issue?

[@dr4sail852]

Informative review. I already have the fuji 18-135 and it renders very well and travels well. Don’t see that I would need this in my kit

[@robertcudlipp3426]

That is the exact problem I have.

[@rondypondy]

What an incredibly informative video! I just love the way you describe things. I've been using the 16-80 f/4 since it came out as I travel quite often but recently dropped it and it needs repairing. I'm seriously considering replacing it with this. Just need to decide if I want to trade the minor difference in focal length for a constant f/2.8.

[@mskedarnath]

In the 18-55 range, Tamaron 17-70mm F2.8 vs Fuji 18-55mm f2.8-f4 Which one is better?