Canon G1 X Mark III Ultimate Review

[@TechGearTalk]

What's up everyone?! I hope this review of the Canon G1 X MKIII is helpful. Did you like it? Was there too much detail? Not enough? What did you like, and also, what did you not like? What would you like to see more of? Would love to know what you think, good or bad. I am grateful in advance 🙏 I like the image and video quality from such a tiny camera, amazing auto-focus but would have liked to see an external mic input and improved remote control. Let me know what you think!!

[@TechGearTalk]

It was pretty nice for such a small camera. I like the quality. What would you use it for?

[@takanishi21071979]

Tech Gear Talk : My friend! Nice video! Like! My queston to You: What better i can get, G1 x mark3 or G7 x mark 2? I planing to shoot 90% video , and underwater too with aqua box....

[@10584017]

This was a very nice and complete review. Thank you!

[@tonyfordy7679]

2023 - just found this review after the recent purchase of a G5X and wondered if I should upgrade. The presentation was excellent, delivered at the right speed so you can understand it, and the reviewer very knowledgable. Have subscribed to the channel.

[@Lucamitm]

you mentioned that the 1inch sensor model lens is faster lens, but doesn't the apsc sensor compensates for this on the g1xmiii ? how is the image quality compared to average apsc with lenses, or phrasing it differently, how is the quality of the lens attached to it ? thanks

[@markriley7472]

Your reviews are always spot on and provide a fair, unbiased and knowledgeable assessment of the camera in question. The only disadvantages of the G1X Mark 3 (one from a photographic point of view and the other as a cash strapped consumer!) ) would be the limited aperture and the price! At the time of your review, it would have been around $1200 new. Now, however, looking on e-bay, I have seen a few examples not much over £500-700 (or $678-950 appx)-cheaper if sourced from the States! That would make it a viable alternative to the excellent Canon M50 now. As you say, no camera gives you everything, but the focal length here is a very useful one, and the image stabiliser would be very useful, especially with the slow lens in lower light and ability to negate the use of high ISOs. by using a slower shutter speed for static subjects. And at least HD video would be nice and steady hand held! Many expensive DSLRs/Mirrorless cameras don't have that-anything that gives you confidence in your camera will make you use it more. Also, the build quality and element of weather sealing gives the user the user extra reassurance. So even if you can't change lenses, the G1X 3 has so much going for it and you can't ask much more of that from a small camera with an APSC sensor. Thumbs up-just lower the price in the January Sales, Canon :)

[@floridahiker1800]

An apsc point and shoot camera with a built in nd filter, zoom toggle, weather sealing, exposure comp dial, leaf shutter and c1,c2 on the mode dial was what I wanted. I don't get why everyone thinks it's supposed to compete with mirrorless instead of point and shoot apsc cameras like the popular fujifilm x100f or Ricoh GR II. X100f users don't even use the mic input.

[@TechGearTalk]

That's a really strong argument. Those are outstanding features. I think a lot of people may not understand the value of some of those features over something as simple as an external mic input and so on the surface they may think it doesn't compare. Also, the price (at least when it was released) was somewhat high. Do you own this camera?

[@daveday999]

got one and took it to Disneyland - worked great! Low light auto-focus is really good... Very happy with it!

[@TechGearTalk]

Sweet! That's awesome to hear! Low light AF is so hard to do too...

[@PrayerWarriorPh]

Zekie, can you do a Canon G3X review, since your reviews are awesome. I really liked the G1X MIII review. Thanks.

[@raysrcsandtech]

Would you say this is between the G5x and M5, I have both and as much as I like the G5x I always feel the image is not the greatest, the M5 of course with the kit 15-45 is basically this camera. Is this camera a little bigger than the G5x? or is it the same. Im thinking of retiring my G5x for this one. I still want the hot shoe and I think the APC is going to give me the quality of the M5 that I prefer but with portability of the G5x. Just wondering if I should wait as this is now an old camera I wonder if Canon will update it. I was also looking at the G3x but that now seems discontinued and no sign of G3x2 from Canon.

[@rccasgar]

Hi, I bought a Fuji X-E3 recently (together with XF18mm f2.0, XF27mm f2.8 and XF50mm f2.0) because I really wanted to try the Fuji ecosystem after hearing a lot of good things about it (as a JPEG shooter, film simulations and all the possibilities to tweak the JPEGs looked very appealing to me). I chose the X-E3 for budget and size reasons… as a happy owner of a Sony RX10 mk4, I was looking for something smaller which was performing better in low light/bokeh. I sold my RX100 mk5 to buy the Fuji. I never enjoyed its ergonomics… In the past I’ve also had some other cameras: Canon G1X Mk1 & Mk2, and a Sony A6500. As you can see, I am some kind of non-interchangeable lens lover, and it is still the case. Fuji X-E3 was my second attempt to the ILC world (after the A6500) and I am not enjoying it too much. But what worries me even more, I am not enjoying the X-E3… Autofocus is not good at all, at least in medium-low light (maybe on a sunny day it is), or I am not being able to make it work. In summary, I am thinking on selling my Fuji kit and buy a compact zoom camera. As I’ve seen you are/have been a Fuji owner, and also have owned many compact cameras, I would like your advice on which compact camera to buy. There are my priorities: - Good/reliable autofocus (I am more a photographer than video shooter, but I do occasionally family videos) - Compact size (it doesn’t have to be a very small camera, but for sure not a DSLR-like, as I already have a fantastic RX10 mk4 there) - Good low light performance - Bright zoom lens (I’ve learnt I don’t like a fix lens when using my Fuji primes) These are the options I am considering: - Canon G1X Mk3 (big sensor, dual pixel, manual controls) - Canon G5X (longer focal range, bright lens) - Panasonic LX100 Mk2 (big sensor, manual controls, bright lens) - Panasonic LX10/15 (bright lens, manual controls) Which would be your pick between these 4? Any other better option?

[@mikelocke3258]

Great methodical review and well explained, thanks.

[@TechGearTalk]

Thanks Mike! I'm glad it was helpful.

[@twagn]

Price point is crazy especially compared to the M50 with kit lens

[@TechGearTalk]

Thanks for watching Tom. I can't agree more. Hard to understand the target audience. What are you using?

[@35259edgarboudaher]

I got the M50 and it's miles ahead plus you could use any canon lens with an adaptor. Better and expandable.

[@TechGearTalk]

I agree Edgard. I'm not sure where this camera fits in the Canon lineup.

[@deanrowden4227]

Excellent review - very helpful.

[@TechGearTalk]

I'm super glad it was helpful Dean! Let me know if you have any questions.

[@EchelonArts]

Good review. Looking at this as a replacement for an LX100. Nice use of OddVision's music in the intro.

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you so much for watching and for the feedback! This is a very nice all-in-one. I think the price has come down a bit too, so that's never a bad thing

[@RR-vo6zv]

Really like your reviews... especially for someone who is trying hard to navigate through the choices available these days. As a beginner I’m thinking of going for the Canon EOS 250D! What do you think?

[@TechGearTalk]

Thanks Ray Ray, I'm glad they are useful. Do you think you'll be more comfortable with an all-in-one or a dslr/mirrorless?

[@Ja1369L8]

Hi, just curious two things (I only care about photos), how is image quality compared with RX100 VA? I noticed you said autofocus is good, but still not comparable to Sony Rx100 VA?

[@Vtec01]

Nice review very in-depth. Especially like the video examples.

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you so much. I’m glad you like it!

[@andreaskesse]

What is in your opinion the best camera out there, what ever brand and price for good sharp pictures, im not filming or making any kind of movies, im just intrested in the photos

[@TechGearTalk]

Honestly, I've never really thought about it. The Fuji GFX 100 is an incredible stills camera.

[@quazisanjeed6395]

Thank you for the video. I own the G5X that packs almost every feature of G1X Mark III. Any strong reason to ditch mine in favor of this one.

[@mostlymessingabout]

Smaller sensor. So 1 stop less ISO performance. Maybe less bokeh

[@quazisanjeed6395]

@@mostlymessingabout thanks for the suggestion. I already own multiple pro Canon DSLR bodies and native lenses for serious work. Therefore, this P&S camera (G5X) is good enough for casual purposes. It's not wise to spend money for insignificant causes. Moreover, G5X possesses a faster aperture at the wide end. Thanks again.

[@vasiliskarkalas]

Nice review dude!. Also thanks because based on your review in an older video I got the SL2 which is great camera.

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you so much for the kind words! I love that you're enjoying the SL2!!

[@jerry2357]

I am a keen amateur photographer, and very rarely take videos. I often use SLRs, but I like to use a high-end compact for travel and to carry when I’m out walking and not primarily going out to photograph. My key requirements are a reasonable zoom range, a reasonable size sensor (i.e. much bigger than the sensor on an iPhone) and the ability to shoot jpeg and raw simultaneously. As an indication with respect to zoom range, on a full frame SLR I usually use a 24-105 mm lens, and quite often end up at the 105 mm end when taking pictures. Currently I have a G1X Mk 2, and it has a nice balance of size, zoom range and image quality. What would make it better would be firstly manual zoom, rather than power zoom, secondly a built in EVF, and thirdly moving the WiFi button where I can’t press it accidentally. Zooming by pressing buttons is always slower than turning a zoom ring, and it’s difficult to zoom precisely. I have added the external EVF to my camera, but it makes the camera considerably bigger than it would need to be with a built-in EVF. Also, it means that I can’t use an external flash. The Mk 3 would give me my second desire, a built-in EVF. But when going from the Mk 2 to the Mk 3, they have increased the sensor size, so they have had to reduce the zoom range to avoid having to have a bigger and heavier lens. However the sensor on the Mk 2 is not much smaller than APS-C, and gives very good results, especially when taking raw and post-processing the images in Lightroom. The Mk 2’s zoom range of about 24-120 mm (35 mm equivalent) is a very nice one which covers many photo-taking opportunities. In contrast the Mk 3 only goes to 70 mm, which is nowhere near enough. I take a lot of images more zoomed in than that. So if my G1X Mk 2 was broken, there is no way I would replace it with the Mk 3. In my opinion they have gone from a nice camera that does most of what I want from my travel camera to one that just can’t cut it. The lack of zoom to more than 100 mm (35 mm equivalent) is a dealbreaker.

[@TechGearTalk]

Hi Jerry, first, thank you for watching. I appreciate you taking the time to share your experience and insight. I can see exactly what you're saying and why you would make that decision based on your requirements. I like that you've identified what's important to you (for this specific type of camera/use) and how that is guiding your decision. Better focal range (and for me, an external mic input) would have helped with the MK 3. What SLRs are you using?

[@jerry2357]

My main camera is a Canon 5D Mk 3, with a variety of lenses, but I also use a 7D Mk 2 with a 100-400 mm lens for bird photography (crop sensor to give more magnification).By the way, I have also travelled with the 5D Mk 3 and just the 24-105 mm lens, and that is fine for most of what I want to do when I'm on holiday. But with a charger and a flash it takes up quite a lot of room in my daysack (which is what I carry on if I'm checking a larger bag for clothes etc for a holiday of a week or more). The G1X Mk 2 is small and light enough to include if I'm travelling on hand baggage only, and if I'm planning to do a fair amount of walking it saves space and weight in my daysack. There is only a little compromise on picture quality, too. A bonus of using the compact camera is that people think you're just a tourist taking snaps, but in fact you have complete creative control. In terms of using the camera, the compact is quite a bit slower than the DSLR (focussing is not as fast and reliable, the exposure controls are not as intuitive, zooming is slower, and continuous shooting is slower). But most of what I photograph on holiday are landscapes, buildings and village/city scapes, observed details etc, and these don't require too much speed. The size and weight of the DSLR is nicer in the hand, but heavier on the neck. I prefer the ease of setting the compact camera for autobracketing, because setting autobracket will simultaneously set the camera to taking three consecutive shots by holding down the shutter release, whereas the DSLR needs autobracketing to be set on the menu, followed by setting the drive to continuous, i.e. two actions. (I sometimes autobracket for high contrast scenes to give me the option of processing via HDR, but actually I usually get better results in Lightroom by carefully selecting one of the three images to start from and then playing with the shadows and highlights).

[@TechGearTalk]

400mm on an APCS sensor, wow!! That is one lens I have not had a chance to play with!

[@jerry2357]

I wish I could afford a 600 mm. You need a very long lens to get good photos of birds.

[@TechGearTalk]

Yeah, but 11.5k on a lens... someone better be paying for these pictures - and a lot!

[@emi.marsh742]

Hello , Thanks for this amazing review , I want to buy a camera, it will last me a lifetime , Because we had it when we were young canon powershot a720 was my childhood , I am confused between canon g1 mark iii and g7 mark iii , I want your help what to buy ? Note that the two cameras are the same price in my country so i want the best Price doesn't matter . sorry for my english 😅

[@lesleyweatherford3604]

Is there one camera that has the features on an G1, high pixels, lighting features, panoramic and the ones on an SX such as super close macros and 65 zoom?

[@TechGearTalk]

The best compact camera I've used is this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fISlnaJngadjppY

[@Jimmyageek]

This fit in my Pocket or Small Belt Pouch which M50 with 22mm can't fit

[@TechGearTalk]

Yup! Can’t beat the retractable lens in this camera in terms of portability!

[@HavanaNewYork]

Hi, On the Canon G1 X MKIII can you mute the shutter sound so that, for example, one can take photos in a church?

[@TechGearTalk]

Yes, it's a mirrorless camera so there isn't a real "sound" (unless you add a "beep" for the focus, which you can turn off)

[@HavanaNewYork]

Thanks for the quick reply and info! Excellent review video BTW.

[@TechGearTalk]

You are very welcome, I hope it was helpful. Thank you so much for watching (and hopefully subscribing).

[@CheckitMedia]

Nice video thank you. Love the intro maybe a bit long but very nice! Nice to see your back in the game. Thumbs up and shared on my linkedin network 135+ connections.

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you!! I know I can always count on you and your support!

[@CheckitMedia]

Love your content

[@TechGearTalk]

🙏 What about this camera? Doesn't seem like a great value...

[@CheckitMedia]

Yes looks like a good value but the lack of mic input is for me a no no, you have to have a mic input. Look at Nico from morningfame kzbin.info/www/bejne/n4SZk5ajm8yKg7c he films with his iphone 6 but has a cheap no brand mic plugged into his iphone and his audio is excelent.

[@TechGearTalk]

That's very good audio from Nico. I was saying that this camera is NOT a great value. I need a mic input from a $1300 camera - no doubt!

[@philippe_durel]

When you really check how far the lens with lens cap protrudes when the Canon G1X Mark III is turned off, and when you know exactly where the battery is located, then you realize that they could have build a much bigger grip to fit a battery with a LOT of battery life in that camera, without making it much bulkier. I mean, who would pack any rather pricey compact camera without a lens cap on the lens, so, in this case, the camera is as bulky as its lens with lens cap protrudes. On top of that the Canon NB-13L is a rather old model of a rechargeable battery pack (like 4 years or even more), and there have been quite some improvements in battery technology since the 1st start of this model of Canon batteries. I have a Canon G7X that I intended to use for underwater photography with the same Canon NB-13L battery model, and that I bought with the Canon waterproof casing, but I quickly found out how limited it was (ultra short battery life, screen just not bright enough for underwater shooting, etc..., etc... ) ... in short, impossible to use for underwater photography. So I got a professional casing for my Sony A7 II to do underwater photography with a lot of satisfaction (the Sony A7 II doesn't have an extremely long battery life, but it's way way better than the Canon G7X for the job), and I wound up only using the Canon G7X with its casing on the kayak with my son, or at the beach, or just as a small and cheap (although it was expensive for what it really was) point & shoot camera to stuff in my pocket, and that's pretty much about it. Quite frankly it all looks to me as the new Canon G1X Mark III is just another EXPENSIVE TOY. And, as I'm not the kind to jump on every "new thing" shat by the industry, I just wait until something really good and competitive is being produced.

[@TechGearTalk]

It would have been great if this camera had better battery life. I would definitely say you need an extra battery (or even two if you're out all day). The A7 II is an outstanding camera. Do you have the G7X original or the MKII

[@18yearsoldnot]

I like the idea of this camera. I got it in 2022… but it’s is terribly uncomfortable to hold and also something which no reviewer mentions is how cameras feel when they dangle around your neck/waist area… and this as well as most slr style viewfinder design-particular cameras is awful. It’s a huge setback for this as a lightweight and compact sort of camera… the problem is that the evf protrudes and digs into your skin because the neck strap joints are for some reason placed on the front of the camera as opposed to the sides, so, the protruding evf does this sort of ice pick action on your torso when you walk about. Had this camera had a rangefinder style layout and the neck strap joins were placed properly, it would be absolute perfection and I wouldn’t leave it at home 😂

[@Rcschim]

Nice one! (I mean the review not the cam :) without reading a lot I'd rather lean to the new Sony Rx100V - right? For the nice slowmo options alone.... however I got the GH5 last week and totally love it. nice to see you've used a clickable TOC - which I'm sure your viewers will enjoy. However: you can make life easier for you: just type the timecode in the description and youtube will make it clickable. See: G1 X MKIII Autofocus 09:20 or the other way round which is what I prefer: 09:20 G1 X MKIII Autofocus greets, Mario

[@TechGearTalk]

I don't exactly know what Canon is doing with this camera. RX100V would work if you don't need an articulating screen, and if you don't the smaller sensor and lack of DP AF. RX100V has a faster lens and slow-mo like you mentioned. Re: Timestamp - NO WAY!!!! That is awesome. Going to change it right now!! Thanks so much Mario!!

[@Rcschim]

ha, glad I could help out with the timestamp. It's really convenient. The only thing even nicer would be if we could have a nice clickable, easy to write, TOC in the screen directly. Like your nice animated TOC in the video - it should be able to make it clickable there... But I dont think that works with cards (max 5) or maybe with annotations....

[@Rcschim]

yes, DP AF ist a killer. That's the only thing that is missing on something like a GH5. But their not so good AF is better now with Firmware 2.3 - I think they got the max out of the contrast AF. greets and happy weekend, Mario

[@TechGearTalk]

Clickable in the video would be cool but YT disabled annotations so :( I need to pick up a GH5 and play around with it for sure. Knowing that you have one and love it is a bonus, plus seeing that they upgrade the firmware is a positive.

[@Rcschim]

yep, I watched your sony camcorder review (ax700?) I think or was it the sony rx100? so I had sony in mind maybe because of autofocus and higher FPS in slowmo - but then I saw that all the quality points go to GH5 in that pricerange. and I'm not even considering to actually use the 10bit option and 400mbit video bitrate :) and for slomo? the 1000fps from sony are in ugly resolution. 180fps on GH5 are in true HD and look really smooth!

[@kaizerkabir5152]

It's difficult to get is it a camera review or photography class. As you mentioned it's ultimate review.

[@dhilsiva]

I've watched a few of your videos but this is the third camera review video of yours I watched. I was confused between the M50 and the RP initially. The announcement of the M6 Mark II has confused me even further. I'll wait until it's officially announced at the end of this month and then make a decision. I'm considering the G1 X Mark III as well.

[@TechGearTalk]

Glad the videos are being useful. I'm curious about the M6 MK II as well!

[@dhilsiva]

@@TechGearTalk me too. So I guess I shall watch your M6 Mark II video when it's out and comment on it and you could help me then.

[@TechGearTalk]

I'll do one as soon as possible after I use it for a while

[@dhilsiva]

@@TechGearTalk that's great! Thank you!

[@TechGearTalk]

You're welcome

[@carykuo8818]

I previously use the g7x II and now have a GH5. I think I’m getting this camera because i miss the smaller form factor of a point and shot which allows me to bring it to anywhere with me. Plus a new one is selling at about 850USD here in my country. Great review !!!

[@TechGearTalk]

Thanks Cary, I appreciate the feedback. Where are you? $850!!!!! Amazing deal.

[@carykuo8818]

Tech Gear Talk I’m located in Taiwan. The official Taiwan Canon dealer is selling this camera at about 1000USD but we also have imported one from Japan which are at about 850USD. You can check out amazon.jp for their price.

[@TechGearTalk]

Thanks for the info, that's a super cool.

[@kskisser]

I got my M50 Mark 2 for $749.00 and I have a hard time understanding the price on this camera. I get that this is a point and shoot vs a camera that uses multiple lenses but the advantages far outweigh the portability of the G1X 3. I suppose it would be good to own as a second camera....one that you might get into a concert without a photo pass.

[@michellaval7302]

Très bonne vidéo , elle m'aide pour choisir un bon compact. Et pour la photo de rue ?...

[@tomstickland]

Why do people call these point and click when in full manual mode you have as much control as a DSLR, likewise you can use a DSLR in point and click mode? I've got a G1X mk1 which I'm very fond of. I use a Fuji XT-1 for more demanding work which produces really great images. I've been looking at the G1X mk2 on Ebay but finding it hard to love. The Mk3 looks like an exercise in trying to cram an oversize sensor into a compact body but then runs into inevitable compromises with the lens design. I'll keep my eye on Ebay prices because I'd quite like to try one of these. The Panasonic LX-100 is a great camera to consider too.

[@TechGearTalk]

I think it’s just a way to categorize cameras with built-in zoom lenses. Agree that the functionality as far as features, etc. is similar to a DSLR.

[@사라-t9g]

I like landscape and street photography. I am also a sucker for articulating screen when it comes to video. Between the G1xIII and G7xII, which one should I choose? HELP.

[@TechGearTalk]

They are pretty far in price. Is budget not a factor?

[@사라-t9g]

Price is not an issue, I care more about good quality images, videos & comfort

[@TechGearTalk]

The G1XIII is a better camera. It has a larger sensor and will do better in low-light. I think it's a bit pricey, but if you're strictly looking at what's "better", G1XIII it is.

[@사라-t9g]

I agree, I've done a little research and even though I go for quality first, I don't think the price of G1XIII is right for what it provides.

[@TechGearTalk]

What are you leaning towards now?

[@GearReviewDepot]

Can the battery be charged while in the camera like the G7x Mark II? or does it have to be taken out and placed in a wall charger?

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you very much for watching. I have not been able to do that. However, there is an AC input that you can use for continuous power. Are you planning on using it for your channel? What are you shooting with now?

[@GearReviewDepot]

@@TechGearTalk I would be using it for my channel. Currently using the g7x Mark II which I absolutely love.

[@TechGearTalk]

The G7XMKII is a killer camera. Do you think this camera offers enough of an upgrade in features?

[@GearReviewDepot]

@@TechGearTalk Not really. Based on my research I'm better off staying with the G7x Mark II

[@jessicalattes72809]

would you say the Canon PowerShot G1X Mark III or II?

[@TechGearTalk]

Hard to answer. The iii has better specs and performance but are those worth the extra money for how you’ll use it?

[@Ravi0591]

Good Review.

[@TechGearTalk]

Glad it was helpful and thank you for the kind words 🙏🏻

Is it possible to charge the battery from a power bank?

[@TechGearTalk]

I no longer have this body so I'm not sure.

[@abbaroonie1625]

Love the detail in your vids...but I wouldn't give this camera a second look at half the price. I have to wonder what Canon are thinking...jeeez

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you so much! I don't exactly understand where it's supposed to fit in the lineup. I don't think it's a great value.

[@wickedhouston5538]

well you are broke...

[@ShkiperDC]

Hi, Tech. I really liked your video, everything is fully understandable as for not professional photographer like I am. I just have a headache about month what to choose. I am not looking for video cam, I have gopro7 and that is enough for me. I am also have samsung S8 and it is also enough. But I want a photocamera which I could use in travelling, take pictures of landscape, portraits, falimy dinners, whatever, goto camera. I want a great quality, also really good portrait and low light, cause I am really excited about astrophotography. So much opportunities. Panasonic lx100mkii, sonyrx100vi, G1xmarkiii, fujix100f, g7xmkii, whatever. Xould you advise please what will be thr best for my requirements ? I really want to hear your point of view, in case it is possible. Thanks a lot for video!

[@TechGearTalk]

Are you open for something with interchangeable lenses? kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqa8h2Oaid2ijac or do you want an all in one?

[@ShkiperDC]

@@TechGearTalk oui, thanks for quick answer !! Yeap, I want something all in one. I am a seafarer and do not want take a lot with me. Also I exactly know that in case I will like it too much I could spend alot money for accessories, ahaha. I saw your great video about M50, this is really good camera, but may be not in my situation. I spent about month watching KZbin about photocamera and read a lot, just tired, hope you will stop my headache as your opinion became for me weighty after i watched most your videos. Thanks !

[@TechGearTalk]

If it were me, I would go with this camera because it’s the largest sensor and offers outstanding autofocus and color. As with all of these, get an extra battery or a usb charger if you plan on shooting a lot. This may not be an issue for you if you’re not shooting video.

[@ShkiperDC]

@@TechGearTalk That's what I chosed from the beginning but everybody told that there is too sort lenses especially for low light, portrait, for what I want. I thought a lot about g1x mark3 especially that I could buy it for 900 usd. Thanks a lot for your opinion, I think it will help me to choose. Wish you smoothly creation ! Anyway +1 to your all-time subscribers.

[@TechGearTalk]

Glad I could be of help and thank you for the support!

[@justsen1547]

I wish i had dat camera

[@TechGearTalk]

Glad you like it! What do you shoot with now?

[@wickedhouston5538]

@@TechGearTalk i use the g9x mark 2. i like how small it is with great quality photos but i can always upgrade to the g1x mark 3

[@kristen4166]

Can you use a tripod with this camera?

[@TechGearTalk]

Absolutely Felix. There is a 1/4 20 at the bottom that you can screw the quick release plate to.

[@kristen4166]

@@TechGearTalk Thank you for your reply! I just brought this camera today. Looking forward to using it on holiday : )

[@AdventuresofDavidandAaron]

Nice camera but no external mic thank you for sharing

[@TechGearTalk]

Yup, I totally get it. This is a great option: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqa8h2Oaid2ijac

[@mostlymessingabout]

There is also an ND filter

[@Tfrank22]

Great video, Sagi! The price point is way too high on this camera. For that price, I’d expect 4K, 120 FPS, and few other features.

[@TechGearTalk]

Yes, yes, yes. I just wonder that exactly is going on here. I can get a G7X MK II AND an M50 for this price. Or just go another direction like a Sony A6500 and get 4k and 120. I would love to know how sales are going for this camera.

[@TechGearTalk]

And as always, thank you for the support!!

[@Tfrank22]

Tech Gear Talk Gear Talk I would also be curious to see how the sales are going. I really couldn't see myself buying it. Btw, do you still have the Sony a6500?

[@TechGearTalk]

I can't imagine they are good.... I don't still have the A6500. Love that camera. Why do you ask?

[@Tfrank22]

Tech Gear Talk Ikr. Just was wondering what you thought after using it long term.

[@esphilee]

You can’t compare aperture directly on camera of different sensor size, just like focal length. Handphones have aperture at sub f2.0, but in reality their depth of field is like f8 in equivalent.

[@TechGearTalk]

That is absolutely true as long as the focus distance is the same. Thanks so much for pointing that out, I will definitely remember mention that moving ahead. Appreciate you taking the time 🙏

[@jackmars1]

這支跟LX100 ii很值得考慮

[@TechGearTalk]

Very true

[@joserobertocastellon]

Really appreciate your reviews! I was getting fired up about the G1 X until I heard the price 😆 I'd rather get the SL2 with a Sigma lens. The G7 X II is more compelling considering the price difference and the faster aperture on the G7. Overall the G1 feels overpriced without many important features.

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you Joey, I really appreciate the input. The Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 is my favorite lens at any price - period, end of story. This camera is a little hard to justify. It has a larger sensor than the G7XMKII, but it's a lot more expensive, has a slower lens. What do you use now?

[@joserobertocastellon]

Thanks for replying! I currently only have my iPhone 7 Plus as my camera. I've been making videos using that and I really enjoy taking photos too. I'm always experimenting getting the most out of it. Friends and family seem to really like what I do as I'm constantly asked to take their photos and videos at events. I'm doing some side hustle to save up for a proper camera so in the mean time I am looking around trying to decide on which camera to buy first. If I could have my way, I'd get the 80D along with the Sigma 18-35mm 1.8, but starting from scratch means I might have to get the SL2 with the kit lens and let it pay for it's future upgrades.

[@TechGearTalk]

That's a smart plan. Get something, use it to make money, then upgrade! I also have the iPhone 7 Plus. It's not a bad camera, but I may have to try some other phones soon.

[@okaro6595]

Yeah, both fit equally well in the pocket. Almost no difference in size: j.mp/2Kwyzy0 Where do people get these comparisons?

[@TechGearTalk]

Thanks for the link. Great site.

[@srvpostsvlog]

Yes, a good camera.

[@TechGearTalk]

I really liked it. A little expensive though.

[@stevelink21]

Greetings, Tech Gear Talk! As a Fujifilm X-T3 landscape and product photographer, I am extremely pleased with the image quality I get from this camera, combined with the stellar, sharp Fujinon XF optics. However, I am researching a small, light "travel camera", as I don't want to expose my X-T3 system to the vagaries of landscape photography in a beach/ocean setting. For that very limited, occasional use, I was considering such cameras as this Canon G1X Mark III, Panasonic Lumix LX100 II, or Sony RX100V. My MAIN criteria are image SHARPNESS and detail retention, and ability to retain such detail when possibly printed to 20x24". Plus, I'd like to keep total budget to around $1000. And, FYI, I'm a 100% stills guy, so don't shoot video. Based on this, which system would you recommend for maximum sharpness/compact form factor? Thank you!

[@TechGearTalk]

First, X-T3 is my favorite mirrorless camera so far. The issue is going to be the comparison right? None of these will be as good, but based on your comment I know you’re aware of the shifted baseline. I would go with the g1x mkiii Beyond the image quality there are actual functional advantages. Touch screen. Fully articulating screen (I miss this every time I don’t have it). I didn’t mention in this video but a built in ND filter is just awesome to have. Thoughts?

[@stevelink21]

@@TechGearTalk Thank you for your detailed reply! Actually, I was seriously considering this G1X mark III, UNTIL I read a review (possibly DPreview) that mentioned that the lens was a bit "soft" at the wide focal length. Now, as . landscape/product photographer, I would be using this mainly at the wide end, and as I am obsessed with sharpness and image detail, that review kind of put me off a bit. So, other considerations would now be the Sony a6300, Canon G5X, or Sony RX100 III. Any further comments would be greatly appreciated! Regards, Steve

[@TechGearTalk]

Hi Steve, I do not have first-hand experience with those three, but I can tell you the a6500 is incredible. I think the main upgrades there were for video and continuous af so I would believe the a6300 would provide very similar results. Again, I have not personally shot with it, just sharing what I believe.

[@stevelink21]

@@TechGearTalk Excellent! OK, as I don't shoot video, I would be leaning towards the Sony a6300, and as I shoot mainly tripod-mounted, IBIS is also of little concern for me. (Although for the purposes of "travel photography that this camera would be used for, I think I would shoot more hand-held than usual.) One major question if I may...What's your opinion of the image quality (sharpness, particularly at the wide end) of the "Kit" Sony 16-55 PZ lens? Realizing my max budget of about $1,000 for this kit, IF the kit lens is inadequate, would you recommend any other Sony wide lenses for the a6300? (I know nothing about the Sony lens system, as I shoot the Fujifilm X-System exclusively.) Thanks again sir!

[@TechGearTalk]

Ok, so honestly, if I were you, I'd get another Fuji so I can re-use my lenses. Sony lenses are $$$ The kit lens is the one I used on the A6500 review and it was very good (IMO). I'm also not a pixel-peepers, lol. If the image looks good, I'm cool with it. Also, again, depends on what you plan on doing with these images.

[@rahulcassettecompany5674]

nice video

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you for taking the time to watch. What did you think of this camera?

[@ixxgxx]

Loved my g16 for off camera flash. Damn thing got stolen.

[@TechGearTalk]

Oh no, that's terrible :(

[@luckynever8208]

much prefer the RX100VI for the price. without 120fps in 1080p and 4k... it's a letdown

[@TechGearTalk]

I can see that. The G1XMKIII has a larger sensor and probably better AF, but 120 and 4k are really nice to have!

[@vanderslagmulders]

I wish more high end compacts were weather sealed. Great review by the way.

[@TechGearTalk]

I agree. The price certainly seems like it would justify this feature. What are you shooting with now?

[@vanderslagmulders]

I'm in the market for new camera because I was disappointed by the camera quality of my phone. I want to use it when I'm out hiking and e.g. in restaurants with lowlight. I do also have a very noisy old digital ixus 870 IS, which is hopeless in lowlight.

[@TechGearTalk]

Makes sense. Do you have the ability to add light? or are you stuck shooting with ambient light?

[@vanderslagmulders]

btw isn't the g1x mk3 dust and splashproof? I thought it was but am confused now by your reply.

[@TechGearTalk]

I'm sorry if I confused you, it is dust and water resistant. I was just saying that at this price point, if you're not getting that from a compact camera, then I don't know what the manufacturer is doing.

[@cintabacabaca2266]

I love my m50

[@TechGearTalk]

Who wouldn’t?! Great camera!!

[@marioplus321]

not liking the camera but fine you do reviews of such ones which is in need as well as reviews of camcorders_

[@TechGearTalk]

I like this camera, I just don’t understand the price point.

[@marioplus321]

@@TechGearTalk you are right. That is what I meant.

[@TechGearTalk]

Got it!

[@asanmartinjr07]

These compact cameras are much too expensive for what they offer. Canon's mirrorless or low end D-SLR's are a much better value.

[@TechGearTalk]

I happen to agree.

[@okaro6595]

Costs just three times my G9 X Mark II. Nice camera but not in my price range.

[@TechGearTalk]

I totally see what you're saying. Do you currently have the G7XMKII (which I love!)

[@bosshuhaa]

YOU’RE SO LIKEABLE

[@TechGearTalk]

Thank you :)

[@SergeyKasimov]

You look like the guy from Friends

[@TechGearTalk]

We were on a break!!!

[@sizzlemann]

Without 4K video, this camera is already obsolete. I'd get the Sony RX100 mark V or VI before I would buy this camera.

[@TechGearTalk]

yup. Even with the smaller sensor, you are getting a much better focal length, faster lens, hfr. AF won't be as good though

[@soldermecold7456]

Not if you don't care about video... I shoot more stills that video by a large margin.

[@aperez4198]

Can I put it in my pants pocket. I plan to take pictures in the Bronx where I used to live. and they will rob you if they so much as see your camera. Let's say baggy jeans because it is hard for any camera to fit in tight jeans. Or wearing slacks, which usually have roomy pockets.

[@OttosTheName]

I think it's 5.1 cm thick or 2 inches. It's a little bulky but in saggy pants should be doable. It's probably a bit too big to take with you every day even if you don't know if you're going to use it. You'll definitely notice it's there. You might prefer a ricoh griii or fujifilm xf10 (fixed lens...)

[@vishwasgowda9503]

Don’t have Nikon camera Sony camera other drone camera bro

[@TechGearTalk]

Thanks for watching. I didn't understand the question