Discussion on the Cynefin framework | Dave Snowden & Imre Porkoláb | TEDxBudapestSalon

[@lordrozar]

This is the dryest comedy I've ever heard. Awesome.

[@fringefringe7282]

His is so smart, he knows answer to every question!

[@drissbouqantar3600]

brillant 👍

[@jimallen8186]

Have to disagree on scientific management. Taylor took the agency of the laborer away as he said his betters would figure out his best practice. Taylor may have gotten individual laborers more pay by increasing their output, but he made them into the cogs. He took away their thinking, their room to adapt and put such in the hands of others. Now such has been applied to things like medicine with atrocious effect. Toyota expects employees to solve problems as they arise; Taylor expects employees to do as they’re told while management should figure it out. Taylor also worked squarely in the Ordered domain close to the bridge between Clear and Complicated. Taylor thought there were best practices for anything. Taylor didn’t appreciate the possibility for multiple good practices let alone a place where expertise was irrelevant if not damaging and practices could be emergent.

[@DavidRandall2020]

'When you achieve complexity you can reduce cost'. Can't we spend the money instead so that we can get simplicity?

[@lkors7387]

I got the 100 view🤪

[@mattieutheron6112]

There is serious gold in this conversation.

[@alexarobinson2850]

I feel like this man needs to advise geopolitics. So much empathy and compassion.

[@undiscoveredC]

Best stand-up comedy of the year! How does he keep a straight face? Amazing.

[@Jane306]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@mugokiberenge8818]

a framework that makes me read continously

[@orleygyorgy]

Jó a videó és a témaválasztás, még egy a korunk bonyolult rendszereiben eligazodni kívánók számára egy megoldási lehetőséget felvető, látókör bővítő beszélgetés.

[@jimallen8186]

He made mention that “an economist” talked about thinking fast and thinking slow while discussing discomfort aiding creativity. He said he’d prefer a biologist’s terminology at the same concepts. I think he missed that the “economist” may have won a nobel for economics but he was in fact a psychologist. Not only this, the fact that the psychologist won in economics can show another point favoring knowing complex versus complicated; out of field experts often help the field when the field steps from complicated to complex. Diverging on this, I’d note well before this psychologist won his prize, a senator was writing about how government should have sociological and psychological advisors just as they do economic ones. The “economist” is Danny Kahneman and the senator was J. William Fulbright. The respective books Thinking Fast and Slow and The Arrogance of Power.

[@rohanglenmartin]

This was amazing!

[@jimallen8186]

Also disagree that automatic responses begin outside the brain; they just fire from different parts of the brain. Agree that the System 2 will engage to check the response was correct and edit it for next time.

[@andropovstyle69]

he works with gary klein, he knows what he talks about lol

[@barryonthefly]

BAHAHAHAHA

[@sabrinaliu66]

i serious doubt over populism is an issue, it's a big joke. he is not so intelligent after all but cunning.

[@JayceWendel]

First?